Skechers Aero Razor  Running Shoe Review

Reviewed Jun 09, 2026 at 10:17am
Tested using Methodology v0.11 
Skechers Aero Razor

Track

7.9
Marathon Racing 
7.7
5K/10K Racing 
7.5
Responsiveness 
8.1
Cushioning 
7.0
Lateral Stability 
9.5
True To Size 

Track

 0

The Skechers Aero Razor is a lightweight, plastic-plated tempo trainer that delivers premium performance without the premium price tag. A descendant of the cult-classic GOrun Razor line, its induction into the Aero family brings a new HyperBurst Pro midsole, giving the ride a fun, responsive feel. It's impressively cushioned for such a light shoe, and the early rocker plus aggressive toe spring make it smooth in transition and fluid through toe-off. It's a great option for runners looking for a nimble companion for speedy workouts and fast daily training, though it isn't the best shoe for slow, easy days.

Our Verdict

7.9
Marathon Racing 

The Skechers Aero Razor is a good pick for marathon racing, thanks to its light weight, lively forefoot, and impressive cushioning. While that cushioning does fade slightly as the miles build, it still holds up decently well overall. That said, as a tempo trainer rather than a dedicated marathon racer, its lower heel stack may leave slower or lighter runners wanting a bit more protection over longer distances.

Pros
  • Impressive cushioning.

  • A-TPU foam provides good energy return in the forefoot.

Cons
  • Heel cushioning is not the best for slow, lighter runners who heel strike.

7.7
5K/10K Racing 

The Skechers Aero Razor is a good choice for shorter races, thanks to its light build and good responsiveness. Transitions are smooth, and toe-off is fluid; however, while it feels nimble, it isn't the most explosive shoe, since the plate is more for stability than propulsion.

Pros
  • Early rocker and aggressive toe spring provide a fluid toe-off.

  • A-TPU foam has good responsiveness.

Cons
  • Not the most explosive plated ride.

7.5
Responsiveness 

The Skechers Aero Razor offers good responsiveness, especially through the forefoot. Its A-TPU midsole, early rocker, and aggressive toe spring help the shoe roll smoothly. The plate adds some stiffness, but the ride isn't particularly explosive overall.

Pros
  • Aggressive rocker geometry.

  • Very good forefoot energy return.

Cons
  • Rocker tends to flatten under force.

8.1
Cushioning 

The Skechers Aero Razor provides impressive cushioning for such a lightweight shoe, with very good protection under both the heel and forefoot. However, its A-TPU midsole performs best under higher loads, so heavier or faster runners will benefit most, while slower, lighter runners may struggle to get the best from the shoe. It holds up decently over longer efforts as well, though there is a noticeable decline as the miles build.

Pros
  • Great forefoot cushioning.

  •  A good pick for heavier runners.

Cons
  • Noticeable decline at longer distances.

7.0
Lateral Stability 

The Skechers Aero Razor has satisfactory lateral stability. Its heel and forefoot platforms are wide enough for the shoe's stack, and the plastic H-wing plate helps add some control underfoot. However, the outsole narrows sharply through the arch, and the heel isn't especially firm, making the ride less planted.

Pros
  • Wide heel and forefoot platform.

  • Plate helps add control underfoot.

Cons
  • Narrow outsole through the arch.

  • Heel isn’t especially firm.

9.5
True To Size 

The Skechers Aero Razor fits true to size overall. Its length is spot-on, with good width through the forefoot and arch, so most runners can confidently choose their usual size. The main issue is forefoot height, which runs low and may feel tight for runners with taller toes.

Pros
  • Excellent length fit.

  • Good forefoot and arch width.

Cons
  •  Low forefoot height.

  • 7.9
    Marathon Racing
  • 7.7
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 7.5
    Responsiveness
  • 8.1
    Cushioning
  • 7.0
    Lateral Stability
  • 9.5
    True To Size
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Jun 09, 2026: Review published.
    2.  Updated Jun 01, 2026: Early access published.
    3.  Updated May 12, 2026: Our testers have started testing this product.
    4.  Updated Apr 23, 2026: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    ​We tested the Skechers Aero Razor in men's U.S. size 9, as indicated on the label of our pair. The color shown is White/Black/Orange, but you can also get the shoe in other colors, depending on the region. This shoe isn't available in wide widths. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested.  

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The Skechers Aero Razor refines the formula that made the old GORun Razor line a cult classic: a lightweight, low-profile trainer with enough pop for faster daily runs and workouts. It goes against the current high-stack trend, with a firmer, more grounded platform, and the A-TPU midsole and aggressive rocker make for a smooth, rolling ride. Among similar lightweight trainers, the adidas Adizero Evo SL is the more versatile option, with superior responsiveness and cushioning that holds up better over longer runs. The ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 is the punchier pick, with a carbon plate and stiffer rocker that make it better suited to shorter efforts, while the Skechers is slightly more forgiving over longer distances. The PUMA Deviate NITRO 4 is the heavier, firmer, more stable option.

    Within the Skechers lineup, the Aero Razor feels less like a simple replacement and more like a reset for the Aero family. The Skechers Aero Burst is still the max-cushioned daily trainer for long runs and easy efforts, while the Skechers Aero Spark is harder to place: it has a plate and sits in the faster part of the range, but it uses a supercritical EVA-based midsole and is much heavier and less responsive than the Razor. The Skechers Aero Tempo remains the carbon-plated race-day shoe, using a premium TPU-based midsole, but the Razor complicates that hierarchy. Its A-TPU-based foam is more responsive, and helps it come in much lighter than the Tempo while also being more cushioned and better suited to racing than any other Aero shoe. That makes the Razor a very exciting proposition indeed, raising the bar for where the Aero series goes next.

    If you're looking for more options, take a look at our recommendations for the best running shoes and the best shoes for running a marathon.

    ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5

    Track

    The ASICS MAGIC SPEED 5 and Skechers Aero Razor are both lightweight plated trainers built for faster running, but the ASICS is more suited to shorter efforts, with a carbon-fiber plate and a much stiffer rocker, giving it a snappier feel for 5K and 10K efforts. The Skechers is slightly lighter, more cushioned, and more forgiving underfoot, with better protection through the forefoot over longer runs.

    adidas Adizero Evo SL

    Track

    The Skechers Aero Razor and adidas Adizero Evo SL are lightweight trainers that blur the line between daily training and faster workouts. The Skechers is lighter, lower-drop, and more race-leaning, with a nylon plate and aggressive rocker that give it a quick, rolling feel. The adidas uses a plastic shank rather than a plate, and has a more responsive ride, with cushioning that holds up better over longer efforts. Both are great options for faster daily training, but the adidas is the more versatile choice for runners who want more range from one shoe.

     

    Skechers Aero Burst

    Track

    The Skechers Aero Burst and Skechers Aero Razor sit on different sides of Skechers' lineup. The Aero Burst is the max-cushion daily trainer, with a taller stack, no plate, and more cushion for daily training. The Aero Razor is much lighter and lower, with a plastic plate, a more responsive ride, and is best for workouts or races. Both offer plenty of cushioning, but the Burst is the better pick for easy and recovery runs, while the Razor is the clear winner if you want something faster and more stripped-back.

    PUMA Deviate NITRO 4

    Track

    The Skechers Aero Razor and PUMA Deviate NITRO 4 are both plated trainers built with faster running in mind, but they feel different underfoot. The Skechers is much lighter, lower, and more cushioned, with a plastic plate and aggressive rocker that make it feel quick and easy to turn over. The PUMA is heavier and firmer, with a 3/4-length plastic plate and a more stable platform, and requires runners to work harder for their rewards. 

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We buy and test running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes so team members can log in miles. This real-world testing is conducted at various paces and conditions, across different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    8.3
    Weight
    Weight
    194.9 g (6.87 oz)
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    36.4 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    31.8 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    4.6 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    4.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    89 mm (3.5")
    Outsole Arch Width
    52 mm (2.1")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    112 mm (4.4")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.44
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.52
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    279 mm (11.0")
    Internal Heel Width
    66 mm (2.6")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    96 mm (3.8")
    Wide Sizing Available
    No
    9.3
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
    3.5 mm (0.139")
    Toe TTS Deviation
    0.4 mm (0.017")
    4.8
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -6.1 mm (-0.239")
    9.7
    Arch Fit: Width
    Arch Width TTS Deviation
    -0.8 mm (-0.033")
    10
    Length Fit
    8.3
    Heel Rocker Geometry
    Heel Spring
    33 mm (1.3")
    Heel Apex Position
    30.1%
    Heel Rocker Angle
    20.1°
    8.5
    Forefoot Rocker Geometry
    Toe Spring
    65 mm (2.6")
    Toe Apex Position
    59.9%
    Forefoot Rocker Angle
    28.4°
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Fully-gusseted
    Plate
    Plastic
    Performance
    7.3
    Heel Compression Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    77.4%
    7.7
    Forefoot Compression Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    79.1%
    7.8
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    3.05 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    9.89 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    17.69 J
    8.4
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    5.09 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    9.17 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    13.62 J
    4.8
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    49.4 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    95.0 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    209.6 N/mm
    7.3
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    87.0 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    180.4 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    377.8 N/mm
    7.2
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    7.94 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    7.72 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    7.57 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    7.44 J
    6.1
    Rocker Stiffness
    Force To Flatten The Rocker
    63 N
    7.9
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    71.1%
    7.2
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    13.9 N/mm
    Forefoot Bending Force
    269 N