ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 vs GLIDERIDE MAX

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX

Tested using Methodology v0.8.2

Updated Oct 27, 2025 01:01 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v0.8.2

Updated Jan 27, 2026 05:23 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Our Verdict

ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26

ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX

The ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX is like a slightly more elevated (literally and figuratively) ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26. While both are designed with high-stack, max comfort in mind, the GLIDERIDE MAX is a bit lighter and has some added features, like a rocker and a partial EVA plate, that give it a slightly smoother ride. It's also got a more premium foam, which is softer in the heel.

0 

Variants

  • GEL-NIMBUS 26 (Black/Cool Matcha - (Women - US 7))
  • GEL-NIMBUS 26 (Black/Dusty Purple - (Women - US 7))
  • GLIDERIDE MAX (Birch/Black - (Men - US 9))
  • GLIDERIDE MAX (Birch/Black - (Women - US 7))

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 
 

5.5
6.1

Plate 
 

None
3/4-Length Plastic Plate

Weight  

4.3
5.1

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

2.3
3.0

Heel Energy Return 
 

1.4
2.6

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

4.3
5.1

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

301.9 g (10.65 oz)
283.6 g (10.00 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

42.1 mm
44.8 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

33.2 mm
35.1 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.9 mm
9.7 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.0 mm
6.0 mm
Show Text 

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

93 mm (3.6")
87 mm (3.4")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

84 mm (3.3")
78 mm (3.1")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

115 mm (4.5")
114 mm (4.5")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.21
1.94

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.46
3.24

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

278 mm (10.9")
279 mm (11.0")

Internal Heel Width 
 

64 mm (2.5")
62 mm (2.4")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

96 mm (3.8")
94 mm (3.7")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Fully-gusseted
Fully-gusseted

Plate 
 

None
3/4-Length Plastic Plate
Show Text 
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

1.4
2.6

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Heel Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX Heel Energy Return

Heel Energy Return 
 

66.3%
69.0%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

2.3
3.0

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Forefoot Energy Return
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX Forefoot Energy Return

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

68.4%
69.5%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

7.6
8.5

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Heel Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX Heel Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

3.24 J
3.63 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

9.26 J
10.34 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

16.55 J
18.75 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

7.8
7.8

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Forefoot Cushioning
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX Forefoot Cushioning

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

4.68 J
4.65 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

8.39 J
8.37 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

12.49 J
12.61 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

5.3
4.4

Heel Firmness  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Heel Firmness
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX Heel Firmness

Firmness At 550N 
 

53.2 N/mm
47.8 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

105.6 N/mm
92.7 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

212.8 N/mm
181.6 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

7.7
7.5

Forefoot Firmness  

 Preview Graph
ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 Forefoot Firmness
 Preview Graph
ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX Forefoot Firmness

Firmness At 800N 
 

98.2 N/mm
97.1 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

199.3 N/mm
195.1 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

383.0 N/mm
357.6 N/mm
Show Text 

ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26

ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX

Comments

  1. Comparison

ASICS GEL-NIMBUS 26 vs ASICS GLIDERIDE MAX: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones