PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 vs ASICS METASPEED RAY

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3
ASICS METASPEED RAY

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Dec 09, 2025 04:54 PM

SEE PRICE
PUMA

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Dec 09, 2025 04:54 PM

SEE PRICE
Asics.com
  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Long Distance

Our Verdict

PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3

ASICS METASPEED RAY

The ASICS METASPEED RAY and PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 are both aggressive, performance-focused super shoes, but they take very different approaches. They both focus on delivering the very last percentages of efficiency, even if it's at the expense of durability. That said, the METASPEED RAY leans into a super-soft, ultra-bouncy midsole and featherweight build for maximum efficiency at fast paces, with a partial forefoot plate that adds some stiffness while remaining supremely plush. The tradeoff is a narrow platform and very compliant foam that makes it quite unstable. The PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3, on the other hand, features a full-length carbon plate and a uniquely aggressive rocker geometry on a wider, more planted base, making it feel a bit more confidence-inspiring when cornering, even if it is not quite as light or as cushioned-feeling as the ASICS. Its forefoot feels quite snappy and propulsive, whereas the RAY leans more into elasticity and bounce for momentum.

0 

Variants

  • Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 (Mint Melt/Speed Blue - (Men - US 9))
  • Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 (Mint Melt/Speed Blue - (Women - US 7))
  • Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 (White/Glowing Red/Mint Melt - (Men - US 9))
  • Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 (White/Glowing Red/Mint Melt - (Women - US 7))
  • METASPEED RAY (White/Flash Red - (Men - US 9))
  • METASPEED RAY (White/Flash Red - (Women - US 7))

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 
 

8.7
8.9

Weight  

8.9
9.7

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

8.9
9.7

Right Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS METASPEED RAY Right Shoe Weight Photo

Left Shoe Weight Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS METASPEED RAY Left Shoe Weight Photo

Weight 
 

173.3 g (6.11 oz)
129.3 g (4.56 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS METASPEED RAY Stack Height Photo

Heel Stack Height 
 

39.3 mm
40.0 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

30.4 mm
34.5 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.9 mm
6.8 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.0 mm
5.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Preview 3D
PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
ASICS METASPEED RAY 3D Model Full Shoe

Outsole Heel Width 
 

82 mm (3.2")
71 mm (2.8")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

25 mm (1.0")
62 mm (2.5")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

113 mm (4.4")
94 mm (3.7")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.09
1.78

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.72
2.72
Show Text 

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Preview 3D
PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
ASICS METASPEED RAY 3D Model Internal

Internal Length 
 

273 mm (10.7")
268 mm (10.6")

Internal Heel Width 
 

60 mm (2.4")
54 mm (2.1")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

93 mm (3.7")
89 mm (3.5")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Other Features  

Other Features Photo 
 

Compare High-Res
PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
ASICS METASPEED RAY Other Features Photo

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
Carbon Fiber
Show Text 
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

8.8
8.7

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

See details
See details

Heel Energy Return 
 

86.1%
85.4%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

8.9
9.0

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

See details
See details

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

86.7%
88.0%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

8.1
9.1

Heel Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ASICS METASPEED RAY Heel Cushioning Picture

Heel Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

4.30 J
5.21 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

9.78 J
11.54 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

15.43 J
17.92 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

8.7
8.8

Forefoot Cushioning Picture 
 

Compare High-Res
PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
ASICS METASPEED RAY Forefoot Cushioning Picture

Forefoot Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

5.56 J
5.68 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

9.67 J
9.62 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

14.13 J
14.37 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

5.8
5.0

Heel Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 550N 
 

47.1 N/mm
40.6 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

130.6 N/mm
113.7 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

295.0 N/mm
269.0 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

7.4
7.3

Forefoot Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 800N 
 

88.5 N/mm
95.5 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

177.7 N/mm
181.0 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

394.7 N/mm
341.2 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

8.0
8.3

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

8.81 J
9.16 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

8.60 J
9.04 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

8.47 J
8.91 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

8.39 J
8.82 J
Show Text 

PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3

ASICS METASPEED RAY

Comments

  1. Comparison

PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 vs ASICS METASPEED RAY: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones