Products
Tested using Methodology v0.12
Updated Jun 16, 2026 05:42 PM
SEARCH
Decathlon
Tested using Methodology v0.13
Updated Jul 07, 2026 08:01 PM
SEE PRICE
Decathlon
Weight
294.6 g (10.39 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.1 mm
Plate
None
Weight
277.0 g (9.77 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.7 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
Kiprun KS900 2
Kiprun Kipride Max
The Kiprun Kipride Max and Kiprun KS900 2 are both daily trainers, but the Kipride Max is the more capable and more premium option. The KS900 2 is a simpler, no-frills trainer with a more stable platform, but it isn’t bouncy at all, and its cushioning feels a lot less protective, especially when runs get longer. The Kipride Max has a more substantial stack and more effective cushioning, with a PEBA and EVA-based midsole that adds a bit of bounce, making it the more well-executed shoe overall.
Variants
- KS900 2 (Smoked Black/Fluo Pale Pink/Snow White - (Women - US 7))
- KS900 2 (Steel Blue/Magnolia/Fluo Pale Orange - (Men - US 9))
- Kipride Max (Pale Lilac Purple/Snow White/Pale Yellow - (Women - US 7))
- Kipride Max (Teal Blue/Light Jade/Honey - (Men - US 9))
Check Price
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
5.8
7.3
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
2.0
7.1
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
3.1
7.2
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.1
8.3
Weight
4.6
5.3
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
4.3
7.2
Heel Compression Energy Return
1.1
6.4
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
4.6
5.3
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
294.6 g (10.39 oz)
277.0 g (9.77 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
40.2 mm
41.8 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
31.3 mm
33.1 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
8.1 mm
8.7 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
6.0 mm
6.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
95 mm (3.7")
99 mm (3.9")
Outsole Arch Width
76 mm (3.0")
83 mm (3.3")
Outsole Forefoot Width
114 mm (4.5")
121 mm (4.8")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.36
2.37
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
3.64
3.66
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
272 mm (10.7")
267 mm (10.5")
Internal Heel Width
58 mm (2.3")
60 mm (2.4")
Internal Forefoot Width
90 mm (3.5")
90 mm (3.5")
Wide Sizing Available
No
No
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.0
9.3
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
0.8 mm (0.032")
-0.2 mm (-0.007")
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.9 mm (-0.152")
-3.1 mm (-0.123")
Forefoot Fit: Height
2.3
5.3
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-9.0 mm (-0.356")
-5.6 mm (-0.220")
Arch Fit: Width
10
4.0
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
0.0 mm (0.000")
-7.9 mm (-0.311")
Length Fit
7.0
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
7.1
8.7
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
16 mm (0.6")
35 mm (1.4")
Heel Apex Position
16.7%
22.0%
Heel Rocker Angle
24.0°
28.3°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
7.1
8.0
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
49 mm (1.9")
57 mm (2.2")
Toe Apex Position
63.2%
62.7%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
24.0°
27.4°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Secondary Foam Picture
Primary Foam Name
SOFTECH+
Primary Foam Type
PEBA + OBC + EVA
Secondary Foam Name
N/A
Secondary Foam Type
N/A
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Semi-gusseted
Fully-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
1.1
6.4
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
65.0%
74.2%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
2.0
7.1
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
67.9%
76.3%
Heel Cushioning
6.3
8.8
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
2.38 J
4.01 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
8.19 J
10.88 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
14.98 J
18.28 J
Forefoot Cushioning
6.4
9.0
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
3.74 J
5.84 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
6.89 J
10.14 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
10.47 J
14.78 J
Heel Firmness
9.4
6.2
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
71.9 N/mm
37.6 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
73.9 N/mm
47.1 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
96.9 N/mm
66.7 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
9.5
5.4
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
80.3 N/mm
47.5 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
99.7 N/mm
61.7 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
135 N/mm
86 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
6.1
8.3
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
6.62 J
9.22 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
6.49 J
8.97 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
6.40 J
8.81 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
6.36 J
8.69 J
Rocker Stiffness
6.2
7.0
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
66 N
85 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
3.1
7.2
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
50.5%
66.2%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
4.3
7.2
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
-5.4 N/mm
14.2 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
349 N
264 N
Check Price
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Kiprun KS900 2
Kiprun Kipride Max
Comments
Kiprun KS900 2 vs Kiprun Kipride Max: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.