Products
Tested using Methodology v0.13
Updated Jun 30, 2026 08:23 PM
SEE PRICE
DicksSportingGoods.com
Tested using Methodology v0.13
Updated Jun 30, 2026 08:26 PM
SEE PRICE
DicksSportingGoods.com
Weight
240.5 g (8.48 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.2 mm
Plate
None
Weight
282.6 g (9.97 oz)
Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.7 mm
Plate
None
Our Verdict
Nike Pegasus Plus
Nike Pegasus 42
The Nike Pegasus 42 and Nike Pegasus Plus share a name and some basic design features, but are actually quite different shoes. The Pegasus 42 is the classic daily trainer, with a sturdy midsole, composed of a ZoomAir unit on top of dense ReactX foam. The Pegasus Plus is lighter and lower stacked, but with a midsole made of livelier ZoomX foam. The Pegasus 42 is better for runners who want a firmer, more protected feel, while the Pegasus Plus is the more nimble shoe.
Variants
- Pegasus Plus (Aluminum/Royal Pulse/White/Black - (Women - US 7))
- Pegasus Plus (Black/Anthracite/White/Pure Platinum - (Men - US 9))
- Pegasus 42 (Black/Black/Anthracite - (Men - US 9))
- Pegasus 42 (Black/Black/Anthracite - (Women - US 7))
Main Differences for
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Half/Full Marathon Racing
Threshold
Half/Full Marathon Racing
5.8
5.6
Weight
6.8
5.1
Heel Stack Height
34.6 mm
37.4 mm
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
7.8
5.0
Forefoot Stack Height
25.4 mm
26.7 mm
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
5.9
4.6
Full Comparison
Design
Weight
6.8
5.1
Right Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Left Shoe Weight Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Weight
240.5 g (8.48 oz)
282.6 g (9.97 oz)
Stack Heights
Stack Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Stack Height
34.6 mm
37.4 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
25.4 mm
26.7 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
9.2 mm
10.7 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
10.0 mm
10.0 mm
External Shape
3D Model Full Shoe
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Outsole Heel Width
86 mm (3.4")
89 mm (3.5")
Outsole Arch Width
63 mm (2.5")
63 mm (2.5")
Outsole Forefoot Width
113 mm (4.5")
111 mm (4.4")
Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
2.49
2.37
Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
4.45
4.15
Internal Shape
3D Model Internal
Preview 3D
Preview 3D
Internal Length
274 mm (10.8")
281 mm (11.1")
Internal Heel Width
62 mm (2.4")
63 mm (2.5")
Internal Forefoot Width
89 mm (3.5")
92 mm (3.6")
Wide Sizing Available
No
Yes
Forefoot Fit: Width
9.2
8.6
Forefoot Width Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
-0.3 mm (-0.010")
3.3 mm (0.131")
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.5 mm (-0.136")
-3.3 mm (-0.131")
Forefoot Fit: Height
6.8
4.9
Forefoot Height Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe TTS Deviation
-3.9 mm (-0.153")
-6.0 mm (-0.234")
Arch Fit: Width
2.8
9.6
Arch Fit Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Arch Width TTS Deviation
-8.8 mm (-0.346")
-1.0 mm (-0.039")
Length Fit
10
10
Toe Clearance Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Rocker Geometry
7.5
7.4
Heel Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Spring
21 mm (0.8")
20 mm (0.8")
Heel Apex Position
18.6%
19.0%
Heel Rocker Angle
20.9°
20.0°
Forefoot Rocker Geometry
5.1
5.8
Forefoot Rocker Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Toe Spring
36 mm (1.4")
40 mm (1.6")
Toe Apex Position
62.7%
62.1%
Forefoot Rocker Angle
18.1°
20.0°
Foam
Primary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Secondary Foam Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Primary Foam Name
ZoomX
ReactX
Primary Foam Type
TPE + PEBA
TPEE
Secondary Foam Name
N/A
N/A
Secondary Foam Type
N/A
N/A
Other Features
Other Features Photo
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Tongue Gusset Type
Fully-gusseted
Fully-gusseted
Plate
None
None
Performance
Heel Compression Energy Return
7.7
3.8
Heel Compression Video
Heel Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Heel Energy Return
79.2%
70.4%
Forefoot Compression Energy Return
7.8
5.0
Forefoot Compression Video
Forefoot Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Energy Return
79.8%
71.8%
Heel Cushioning
5.5
6.7
Heel Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Heel Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 550N
2.86 J
3.07 J
Energy Absorbed At 1100N
7.15 J
8.42 J
Energy Absorbed At 1900N
11.84 J
14.14 J
Forefoot Cushioning
4.6
5.3
Forefoot Cushioning Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 800N
3.17 J
3.60 J
Energy Absorbed At 1300N
5.00 J
5.69 J
Energy Absorbed At 2050N
7.06 J
7.87 J
Heel Firmness
8.9
8.7
Heel Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 550N
49.4 N/mm
48.3 N/mm
Firmness At 1100N
66.2 N/mm
60.6 N/mm
Firmness At 1900N
95.7 N/mm
85.9 N/mm
Forefoot Firmness
9.6
9.8
Forefoot Firmness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Firmness At 800N
76.9 N/mm
84.0 N/mm
Firmness At 1300N
106.6 N/mm
112.3 N/mm
Firmness At 2050N
152 N/mm
159 N/mm
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
4.5
4.8
Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Energy Absorbed At 10km
4.91 J
5.28 J
Energy Absorbed At 20km
4.88 J
5.14 J
Energy Absorbed At 30km
4.83 J
5.07 J
Energy Absorbed At 40km
4.80 J
5.02 J
Rocker Stiffness
5.4
5.0
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Video
Forefoot Rocker Stiffness Graph
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Force To Flatten The Rocker
50 N
42 N
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
5.9
4.6
Forefoot Bending Video
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Energy Return
59.9%
55.5%
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
5.3
7.1
Forefoot Bending Resistance Picture
Compare High-Res
Compare High-Res
Forefoot Bending Resistance
Preview Graph
Preview Graph
Forefoot Bending Stiffness
8.6 N/mm
12.5 N/mm
Forefoot Bending Force
190 N
278 N
To access
Become a member
unlimited full product reviews,
product prices, and
other exclusive site features
Nike Pegasus Plus
Nike Pegasus 42
Comments
Nike Pegasus Plus vs Nike Pegasus 42: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Members have direct access to buying advice on our member forum.