PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 vs ASICS METASPEED RAY

Which Running Shoe Is Better?

Products

PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3
ASICS METASPEED RAY

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Oct 30, 2025 08:35 PM

SEE PRICE
PUMA

Tested using Methodology v0.9

Updated Oct 30, 2025 12:40 PM

Amazon.com
  1. Recommended in 1 article:
  2. Long Distance

Our Verdict

PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3

ASICS METASPEED RAY

The ASICS METASPEED RAY and PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 are both aggressive, performance-focused super shoes, but they take very different approaches. They both focus on delivering the very last percentages of efficiency, even if it's at the expense of durability. That said, the METASPEED RAY leans into a super-soft, ultra-bouncy midsole and featherweight build for maximum efficiency at fast paces, with a partial forefoot plate that adds some stiffness while remaining supremely plush. The tradeoff is a narrow platform and very compliant foam that makes it quite unstable. The PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3, on the other hand, features a full-length carbon plate and a uniquely aggressive rocker geometry on a wider, more planted base, making it feel a bit more confidence-inspiring when cornering, even if it is not quite as light or as cushioned-feeling as the ASICS. Its forefoot feels quite snappy and propulsive, whereas the RAY leans more into elasticity and bounce for momentum.

0 

Variants

  • Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 (Mint Melt/Speed Blue - (Men - US 9))
  • Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 (Mint Melt/Speed Blue - (Women - US 7))
  • Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 (White/Glowing Red/Mint Melt - (Men - US 9))
  • Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 (White/Glowing Red/Mint Melt - (Women - US 7))
  • METASPEED RAY (White/Flash Red - (Men - US 9))
  • METASPEED RAY (White/Flash Red - (Women - US 7))

Main Differences for
Marathon Racing

Threshold 

0.10

Marathon Racing 

8.7
8.9

Weight  

8.9
9.7

Full Comparison

Design

Weight  

8.9
9.7

Right Shoe Weight Photo  

Left Shoe Weight Photo  

Weight 
 

173.3 g (6.11 oz)
129.3 g (4.56 oz)
Show Text 

Stack Heights 
 

Stack Height Photo  

Heel Stack Height 
 

39.3 mm
40.0 mm

Forefoot Stack Height 
 

30.4 mm
34.5 mm

Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.9 mm
6.8 mm

Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop 
 

8.0 mm
5.0 mm

External Shape 
 

3D Model Full Shoe  

Outsole Heel Width 
 

82 mm (3.2")
71 mm (2.8")

Outsole Arch Width 
 

25 mm (1.0")
62 mm (2.5")

Outsole Forefoot Width 
 

113 mm (4.4")
94 mm (3.7")

Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

2.09
1.78

Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio 
 

3.72
2.72
Show Text 

Internal Shape 
 

3D Model Internal  

Internal Length 
 

273 mm (10.7")
268 mm (10.6")

Internal Heel Width 
 

60 mm (2.4")
54 mm (2.1")

Internal Forefoot Width 
 

93 mm (3.7")
89 mm (3.5")

Wide Sizing Available 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Other Features  

Other Features Photo  

Tongue Gusset Type 
 

Non-gusseted
Non-gusseted

Plate 
 

Carbon Fiber
Carbon Fiber
Show Text 
Performance

Heel Energy Return 
 

8.8
8.7

Heel Compression Video  

Heel Energy Return  

See details
See details

Heel Energy Return 
 

86.1%
85.4%
Show Text 

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

8.9
9.0

Forefoot Compression Video  

Forefoot Energy Return  

See details
See details

Forefoot Energy Return 
 

86.7%
88.0%
Show Text 

Heel Cushioning 
 

8.1
9.1

Heel Cushioning Picture  

Heel Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 550N 
 

4.30 J
5.21 J

Energy Absorbed At 1100N 
 

9.78 J
11.54 J

Energy Absorbed At 1900N 
 

15.43 J
17.92 J
Show Text 

Forefoot Cushioning 
 

8.7
8.8

Forefoot Cushioning Picture  

Forefoot Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 800N 
 

5.56 J
5.68 J

Energy Absorbed At 1300N 
 

9.67 J
9.62 J

Energy Absorbed At 2050N 
 

14.13 J
14.37 J
Show Text 

Heel Firmness 
 

5.8
5.0

Heel Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 550N 
 

47.1 N/mm
40.6 N/mm

Firmness At 1100N 
 

130.6 N/mm
113.7 N/mm

Firmness At 1900N 
 

295.0 N/mm
269.0 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Firmness 
 

7.4
7.3

Forefoot Firmness  

See details
See details

Firmness At 800N 
 

88.5 N/mm
95.5 N/mm

Firmness At 1300N 
 

177.7 N/mm
181.0 N/mm

Firmness At 2050N 
 

394.7 N/mm
341.2 N/mm
Show Text 

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning 
 

8.0
8.3

Forefoot Long Run Cushioning  

See details
See details

Energy Absorbed At 10km 
 

8.81 J
9.16 J

Energy Absorbed At 20km 
 

8.60 J
9.04 J

Energy Absorbed At 30km 
 

8.47 J
8.91 J

Energy Absorbed At 40km 
 

8.39 J
8.82 J
Show Text 

PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3

ASICS METASPEED RAY

Comments

  1. Comparison

PUMA Fast-R NITRO Elite 3 vs ASICS METASPEED RAY: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
No comments yet, refresh to see new ones