HOKA Bondi 8  Running Shoe Review

Reviewed Nov 07, 2025 at 04:29pm
Tested using Methodology v0.8.2 
HOKA Bondi 8

Track

5.2
Marathon Racing 
4.1
5K/10K Racing 
1.2
Energy Return 
7.3
Cushioning 
7.7
Lateral Stability 

Track

 0
Notice: This running shoes was replaced by HOKA Bondi 9

We've tested these running shoes to expand our database and allow users to compare results to help with their buying decisions. We don't expect to write a full review, but if you have any questions about this product, please let us know!

Our Verdict

5.2
Marathon Racing 
4.1
5K/10K Racing 
1.2
Energy Return 
7.7
Lateral Stability 
  • 5.2
    Marathon Racing
  • 4.1
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 1.2
    Energy Return
  • 7.3
    Cushioning
  • 7.7
    Lateral Stability
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Nov 07, 2025: Review published.
    2.  Updated Jul 08, 2025: Our testers have started testing this product.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    HOKA Bondi 9

    Track

    The HOKA Bondi 8 and HOKA Bondi 9 share a similar ride philosophy, but the newer version modernizes the experience considerably. The HOKA Bondi 8 delivers a firmer and more structured ride, with a denser compression-molded EVA midsole that feels more traditional but noticeably less energetic. The updated HOKA Bondi 9 swaps in a supercritical EVA midsole that improves both heel and forefoot energy return substantially, while also increasing cushioning and reducing weight slightly despite the taller stack height. While both shoes prioritize protection and comfort over speed, the HOKA Bondi 9 feels smoother and more energetic, making it noticeably less sluggish during longer runs, while the HOKA Bondi 8 remains the firmer and more traditional-feeling option overall.

    HOKA Clifton 10

    Track

    The HOKA Bondi 8 and HOKA Clifton 10 are both comfort-first daily trainers, but the Clifton 10 feels more modern. The Bondi 8 is heavier, slightly firmer in the heel, and much less responsive, though its broad platform and mild rocker still make it a stable, easy-rolling option for walking and slow recovery miles. The Clifton 10 adds more stack, better protection, and a lighter build, while retaining the smooth, cushioned feel HOKA is known for. It isn't especially energetic either, but compared with the Bondi 8, it gives you more cushioning, more rebound, and a better overall ride for daily miles.

    HOKA Clifton 9

    Track

    The HOKA Clifton 9 and HOKA Bondi 8 are both cushioned daily trainers, but they don’t feel like direct swaps. The Clifton 9 is the lighter, more straightforward option, with similar overall cushioning in a much nimbler package, making it better suited to easy mileage and dependable daily training. The Bondi 8 is the bigger, heavier cruiser, with slightly more stack underfoot and a broader, more stable platform, but it feels much less energetic. The Clifton 9 works best if you want a cushioned daily trainer that still feels relatively light and simple. The Bondi 8 is better reserved for runners who want a stable, easy-rolling shoe for recovery runs and slow mileage.

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We buy and test running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes so team members can log in miles. This real-world testing is conducted at various paces and conditions, across different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    3.9
    Weight
    Weight
    309.8 g (10.93 oz)
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    40.3 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    33.7 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    6.6 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    4.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    102 mm (4.0")
    Outsole Arch Width
    80 mm (3.2")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    128 mm (5.0")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.53
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.80
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    275 mm (10.8")
    Internal Heel Width
    66 mm (2.6")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    91 mm (3.6")
    Wide Sizing Available
    Yes
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Fully-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    Performance
    0.8
    Heel Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    63.3%
    1.3
    Forefoot Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    65.9%
    6.7
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    2.39 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    8.38 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    16.87 J
    7.8
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    4.18 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    8.46 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    13.70 J
    5.3
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    68.1 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    91.4 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    174.8 N/mm
    6.6
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    94.5 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    162.8 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    282.4 N/mm