Get insider access
Preferred store

Altra Torin 7 Running Shoe Review

Tested using Methodology v0.8
Reviewed Apr 02, 2025 at 10:11 am
Altra Torin 7 Picture
4.6
Marathon Racing
6.1
5K/10K Racing
3.2
Energy Return
5.7
Cushioning
7.9
Lateral Stability

The Altra Torin 7 is a versatile zero-drop daily trainer with a wide toe box. The midsole foam features a EVA and TPU blend. With a gentle forefoot rocker and moderate stack height, the Torin 7 performs decently across a wide range of workouts, though it doesn't particularly excel in any specific area. While not the lightest option available, the Torin 7 delivers reliable stability and comfort, making it an ideal choice for runners transitioning to or already preferring zero-drop footwear.

Our Verdict

4.6 Marathon Racing

The Altra Torin 7 falls short as a marathon racing shoe. The shoe is noticeably heavier than ideal race-day options. Its midsole lacks the energetic rebound expected from high-performance marathon shoes, leading to a ride that feels flat. While it offers some level of cushioning, it doesn’t stand out in terms of softness or impact protection, which could lead to fatigue over long distances. One area where the shoe does perform relatively well is stability, which helps with control but does little to offset its lack of dynamism.

Pros
  • Very stable and secure.

  • Wide outsole makes for a stable platform.

Cons
  • Quite heavy.

  • Cushioning is insufficient.

  • Flat and muted experience.

6.1 5K/10K Racing

The Altra Torin 7 delivers a mixed experience for 5K and 10K racing, offering some structural advantages but falling short in key performance areas. Its forefoot foam stiffness stands out as a strength, providing a solid and supportive platform that can aid in toe-off efficiency. However, the shoe is heavier than ideal racing models, which can slow down turnover and reduce overall speed potential. While it may offer a stable and consistent ride, it lacks the lightness and rebound that define a strong racing flat.

Pros
  • Stiff midsole foam.

Cons
  • Quite heavy.

  • Flat and muted experience.

3.2 Energy Return

The Altra Torin 7 has poor energy return, meaning you won’t get a bouncy feel from this shoe. The underfoot feel is muted, as it's not very responsive.

Pros
Cons
  • Flat and muted experience.

  • Dull midsole.

5.7 Cushioning

The Altra Torin 7 falls short in cushioning, offering a level of underfoot protection that feels underwhelming for runners seeking comfort and impact absorption. Both the heel and forefoot cushioning fail to provide the plushness needed for a truly protective ride, making longer runs feel less forgiving.

Pros
Cons
  • Cushioning is insufficient.

7.9 Lateral Stability

The Altra Torin 7 offers very good lateral stability, providing a secure ride that helps runners maintain control. Its wide outsole arch and firm heel structure create a stable platform, reducing lateral movement and promoting efficiency. The combination of forefoot and heel foam stiffness further enhances support, ensuring a steady feel throughout the stride. While it lacks a gusseted tongue, its overall design delivers strong stability.

Pros
  • Very stable and secure.

  • Stiff midsole foam.

  • Wide outsole makes for a stable platform.

Cons
  • Non-gusseted tongue.

  • 4.6 Marathon Racing
  • 6.1 5K/10K Racing

Performance Usages

  • 3.2 Energy Return
  • 5.7 Cushioning
  • 7.9 Lateral Stability

Changelog

  1. Updated Apr 02, 2025: Converted to Test Bench 0.8.
  2. Updated Apr 02, 2025: Review published.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We tested the Altra Torin 7 in men's US size 9 in the Gray/Green colorway, as indicated on the label. This model is available in a full range of sizes for both men and women, with wide versions offered separately for each, and it comes in a variety of colors depending on your region, including White/Blue, Dark Gray, Orange, Gray/Red, Gray/Orange, Deep Teal/Pink, and White/Black.

Compared To Other Running Shoes

Like all Altra shoes, the Torin 7 has a zero heel-to-toe drop, keeping the foot level with the ground, along with a wider toe box than most shoes, which is intended to give the toes more room to splay out

While the cushioning is relatively poor compared to many max-stack shoes like the HOKA Mach X 2, the Altra Torin 7 still offers some protection, making it a more forgiving option than the Altra Escalante 4 or other zero-drop shoes that venture into the barefoot category. It’s not as close to the ground, giving it a bit more versatility for those who want a balance between ground feel and impact absorption.

However, for most runners, a classic trainer with a moderate drop like the ASICS SUPERBLAST 2 may be a better option, as the Torin 7’s design prioritizes stability at the expense of other performance factors like cushioning and energy return. 

For more options, check out our recommendations for the best running shoes.

ASICS GEL-KAYANO 31

The Altra Torin 7 and the ASICS GEL-KAYANO 31 are both daily trainers emphasizing stability, catering to runners seeking support during their runs. The GEL-KAYANO 31 offers even higher stability, featuring a wider base at the arch. However, this comes with added weight, making the GEL-KAYANO 31 heavier than the Torin 7. Another key difference is the heel-to-toe drop: the ASICS features a high drop, whereas the Altra offers a zero-drop platform.

Brooks Glycerin Max

The Altra Torin 7 and the Brooks Glycerin Max are both reliable daily trainers designed for runners who prioritize consistency over energy return. The Glycerin Max offers a plush, max-cushioned experience with its substantial stack height ideal for long runs and recovery days. In contrast, the Torin 7 emphasizes stability through its lower stack height and zero-drop platform, promoting a natural foot strike.

Nike Pegasus 41

The Altra Torin 7 and the Nike Pegasus 41 are both daily trainers offering comparable levels of stability. The Torin 7 features a zero-drop design and some cushioning, appealing to those who prefer a more grounded feel and a wider toe box. However, its cushioning, while present, may not provide the plushness some runners desire. In contrast, the Pegasus 41 maintains a traditional higher heel-to-toe drop, which can benefit heel strikers looking for a smooth transition. Also, the Nike has a slightly more energetic ride. This makes the Nike a suitable option for runners who prefer to avoid max-cushioned models but still desire a higher heel-to-toe drop.

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
5.8
Design
Weight
Weight
263.4 g (9.29 oz)

This shoe is on the heavier side compared to other daily trainers, but it's still versatile enough for different types of runs without feeling overly sluggish.

Design
Stack Heights
Heel Stack Height
27.4 mm
Forefoot Stack Height
27.0 mm
Heel-To-Toe Drop
0.4 mm
Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
0.0 mm

The measured drop is very close to the advertised drop, making this model effectively a zero-drop shoe.

Design
External Shape
Outsole Heel Width
80 mm (3.1")
Outsole Arch Width
76 mm (3.0")
Outsole Forefoot Width
114 mm (4.5")
Design
Internal Shape
Internal Length
273 mm (10.7")
Internal Heel Width
58 mm (2.3")
Internal Forefoot Width
96 mm (3.8")
Design
Other Features
Tongue Gusset Type
Non-gusseted
Plate
None
Performance
2.7
Performance
Heel Energy Return
Heel Energy Return
74.2%

The heel energy return of this shoe is noticeably lacking, making it feel dull and unresponsive upon impact. When landing on the heel, the foam compresses but does not effectively rebound, causing a loss of momentum rather than propelling the runner forward. This results in a muted ride, particularly for heel strikers who rely on energy return to transition smoothly through their stride.

3.4
Performance
Forefoot Energy Return
Forefoot Energy Return
74.9%

The forefoot energy return is better than the heel energy return but still poor. This shoe simply lacks the dynamism found in more performance-oriented shoes, especially during faster efforts or when trying to pick up the pace.

5.5
Performance
Heel Cushioning
Energy Absorbed At 300N
0.89 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
2.66 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
4.63 J

The Altra Torin 7 has a disappointing amount of cushioning at the heel, providing a minimal amount of shock absorption. This can still suit runners who appreciate some protection at heel strike but don’t require a deeply cushioned ride. However, those seeking a more pillowy landing may find it inadequate.

5.8
Performance
Forefoot Cushioning
Energy Absorbed At 300N
0.85 J
Energy Absorbed At 600N
2.39 J
Energy Absorbed At 900N
4.08 J

The forefoot is slightly more cushioned than the heel, as expected. However, the level of energy absorbed is still sub-par, as it doesn’t deliver the highly cushioned sensation found in max-cushioned trainers like the HOKA Mach X 2. Therefore, it may not satisfy those seeking a very padded underfoot experience.

8.8
Performance
Heel Firmness
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
47.3 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
75.5 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
115.7 N/mm

The Altra Torin 7 has a remarkably stiff heel. This high level of stiffness plays a key role in enhancing the shoe’s overall stability, making it a solid choice for runners who prioritize a secure and supportive ride. However, those who prefer a softer heel may find it too rigid.

9.2
Performance
Forefoot Firmness
Average Firmness 0 To 300N
49.1 N/mm
Average Firmness 300 To 600N
87.1 N/mm
Average Firmness 600 To 900N
134.8 N/mm

The forefoot of this shoe is also extremely stiff, contributing significantly to the shoe’s overall structure and stability. This rigidity ensures a stable platform for toe-offs, which can benefit runners looking for a more controlled ride. However, it may feel too firm for those who prefer a softer forefoot.