Audio-Technica ATH-M60x Headphones Review

Tested using Methodology v1.3.1
Updated Aug 10, 2018 at 10:47 am
Audio-Technica ATH-M60x Picture
5.8
Mixed Usage
7.5
Neutral Sound
5.3
Commute/Travel
5.7
Sports/Fitness
5.7
Office
4.5
Wireless Gaming
6.3
Wired Gaming
2.0
Phone Call
Type On-ear
Enclosure Closed-Back
Wireless No
Noise Cancelling No
Mic No
Transducer Dynamic

The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x are good critical listening on-ear headphones and the biggest departure from the typical over-ear designs of the ATH-M series. They're decently comfortable, breathable, and less cumbersome once on your head, although they're not the most portable on-ears since they do not fold. They have a well-balanced sound that's better than the lower end entries of the ATH-M lineup, but they do not quite sound as good as the M50x or as neutral as the M70x.

Our Verdict

5.8 Mixed Usage

Average for mixed usage. They have a decently sturdy and durable on-ear design, a comfortable fit for most, and a good sound quality that packs just the right amount a lot of bass. They're also wired which makes them an okay option for watching videos, although they are limited by the range of their audio cable. Unfortunately, they won't be as convenient for everyday casual use and aren't as feature-packed as some of the other headphones we've tested around their price range. They won't be the ideal headphones for commuting or traveling, and they're a bit too unstable for sports. But on the upside, they're a well balanced and good sounding headphone for critical listening.

Pros
  • Good sound quality.
  • Comfortable and well-made on-ear design.
Cons
  • No buttons or control options.
  • Poor noise isolation.
7.5 Neutral Sound

Good for neutral listening, The ATH-M60x are not quite as good as the M50x but still deliver a well-balanced sound that packs just the right amount of bass for most music genres. They're also balanced enough that instruments and vocals do not sound too sharp or harsh, but they could be a bit thin and forward in the mix. Overall, they're one of the better sounding on-ear headphones we've measured and do well within the ATH-M lineup. However, the smaller earcup size does also mean a slightly worse soundstage than the ATH-M over-ears.

5.3 Commute/Travel

Below-average for commuting. They only block noise passively, which will not be enough for the noisy environments involved in commuting. They're also a bit bulky to carry around, despite their smaller on-ear design, and have no control scheme to change tracks or volume levels on the go.

5.7 Sports/Fitness

Below-average for sports. They have a decently comfortable on-ear fit and are a bit smaller and more breathable than the rest of the ATH-M series, but they're a bit too unstable for sports and physical activities. They also come with a thick audio cable with no control scheme to change tracks while working out.

5.7 Office

Sub-par for office use. The Audio Technica ATH-M60x do not leak too much but will be audible to the people around you at higher volumes. Unfortunately, they also do not block enough noise to use in noisy environments to be a suitable option for a lively work environment.

4.5 Wireless Gaming

Sub-par for gaming. The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x have a good sound and a low latency wired connection but are not as convenient or as customizable as most wireless gaming headsets. Also, they don't have a microphone. However, if you do not need voice chat, then they could be a decent option for consoles and PCs.

6.3 Wired Gaming
2.0 Phone Call
  • 5.8 Mixed Usage
  • 7.5 Neutral Sound
  • 5.3 Commute/Travel
  • 5.7 Sports/Fitness
  • 5.7 Office
  • 4.5 Wireless Gaming
  • 6.3 Wired Gaming
  • 2.0 Phone Call
  1. Update 11/21/2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.1.
  2. Update 11/21/2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.

Check Price

Video

Test Results

Design
Design
Style

The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x are the biggest departure from the regular over-ear design of the ATH-M series lineup. The M60x have small on-ear cups, and a thin headband with metal hinges, that looks great and makes them feel like more modern studio headphones. They also look a lot more compact on the head than the ATH-M50x or the ATH-M70x, which makes them a lot less cumbersome to wear outdoors while commuting. The on-ear cups are well padded and keep the same design language as most of the ATH-M models, which fans of Audio-Technica will appreciate. Overall, the M60x are good and professional looking headphones, but the on-ear design won't be for everyone.

7.0
Design
Comfort
Weight 0.5 lbs
Clamping Force
0.8 lbs

The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x have a decently comfortable on-ear design. They have a compact and lightweight frame with amply padded earcups. They're also looser on the head than typical on-ears, which makes them a bit more comfortable. Unfortunately, the headband isn't as well padded as the ear cups, and since they are on-ears, they tend to flatten the ear which may get a bit fatiguing over time, especially if you wear glasses with thick temple tips.

0
Design
Controls
OS Compatibility
Not OS specific
Ease Of Use N/A
Feedback N/A
Call/Music Control No
Volume Control No
Microphone Control N/A
Channel Mixing
N/A
Noise Cancelling Control N/A
Talk-Through
N/A
Additional Buttons N/A

These headphones do not have any controls.

7.3
Design
Breathability
Avg.Temp.Difference 3.5 C

Like most on-ears, the Audio-Technica ATH-M60x are a bit more breathable than most over-ears. They do not fully cover the ear and therefore obstruct less airflow than the ATH-M50x which fully encapsulate your ears with their ear cups. You should be able to wear them for longer listening and recording sessions than the rest of the ATH-M lineup, as long as you do not mind the on-ear fit. Unfortunately, they are still less breathable than in-ears and earbuds so they won't be the ideal option for sports or really warm conditions.

6.1
Design
Portability
L 6.8 "
W 6.1 "
H 2.2 "
Volume 91.2 Cu. Inches
Transmitter Required N/A

The ATH-M60x, being on-ears, are more compact headphones than the rest of the ATH-M series lineup. Unfortunately, they do not fold like the ATH-M50x or lay flat like the ATH-M70x. This means that although the over-ears are much larger than the on-ear M60x, they might actually be easier to carry around in your bag or backpack, which is a bit disappointing. On the upside, the M60x feel a lot less bulky and cumbersome once on your head.

6.5
Design
Case
Type Pouch
L N/A
W N/A
H N/A
Volume N/A

These headphones do not come with case.

7.0
Design
Build Quality

The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x have an above-average build quality but feel less durable than the ATH-M50x and do not look as premium as the ATH-M70x. The M60x have dense and sturdy ear cups, with and decently durable metal hinges, that won't break from a few accidental drops. They also come with 3 audio cables that are all heavily coated and will last you a while. Unfortunately, the headband is thin and won't be as sturdy or as durable as that of the M50x. It makes the design of the M60x, lightweight and a tad more flexible than the over-ears in the ATH-M series, but feels weaker and more likely to break under physical stress.

6.5
Design
Stability

The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x are not the most stable on-ears. They have a fairly loose fit on the head, which makes them a bit more comfortable than most on-ears, but also a bit less stable. They will sway a lot when shaking your head from side to side and move around quite a bit when leaning. Their thick audio cable is detachable but locks into the ear cups, so it will most likely yank the headphones off your head if it gets hooked on something. Overall, these headphones are a bit more compact for physical activity, but will not be stable enough for running and most sports.

Design
Headshots 1
Design
Headshots 2
Design
Top
Design
In The Box

  • Audio-Technica ATH-M60x Headphones
  • Audio cables (x3)
  • 1/8" to 1/4" Adapter (X2)
  • Manuals

Sound
Sound
Sound Profile
Bass Amount
-0.61 db
Treble Amount
-0.49 db
7.4
Sound
Frequency Response Consistency
Avg. Std. Deviation
0.52 dB

The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x have an above-average frequency response consistency. Their bass delivery across our 5 human subjects is decent, however, one of our subjects experienced 3dB less bass on the left ear, and another subject experienced a similar drop in bass in the right ear. This means their bass delivery is somewhat sensitive to positioning and placement, but at 3dB, the effect will be subtle. These headphones are a lot more consistent in the treble range, especially below 10KHz. This is most likely due to their small ear cups and on-ear design which makes the possible variations in positioning and placement across multiple re-seats quite limited.

Sound
Raw Frequency Response
9.1
Sound
Bass Accuracy
Std. Err.
1.31 dB
Low-Frequency Extension
10 Hz
Low-Bass
-0.06 dB
Mid-Bass
0.93 dB
High-Bass
2.14 dB

The bass performance is great. The LFE (low-frequency extension) is at 10Hz, which is excellent. Also, low-bass is flat and within 0.1dB of our neutral target. This means the M60x produce just the right amount of thump and rumble, which is important for bass-heavy tracks like EDM and film scores. Mid-bass, responsible for the body of bass guitars and the punch of kick drums is also flat and within 1dB of our target. However, high-bass, responsible for warmth, shows about 2dB of overemphasis which could add a bit of boominess to the bass. But, at 2dB this effect will be subtle.

8.1
Sound
Mid Accuracy
Std. Err.
2.48 dB
Low-Mid
-2.36 dB
Mid-Mid
0.42 dB
High-Mid
1.26 dB

The mid-range of the Audio-Technica ATH-M60x is very good. The overall response throughout the range is quite even and flat. However, the 5dB dip around 400Hz makes their mid-range a little thin sounding which will be mostly noticeable on vocals and lead instruments.

8.2
Sound
Treble Accuracy
Std. Err.
3.26 dB
Low-Treble
-0.93 dB
Mid-Treble
-1.37 dB
High-Treble
0.22 dB

The Audio Technica M60x have a great treble. The overall response is rather uneven but quite well-balanced. The small peaks and dips in mid-treble make the sibilances (S and Ts) a bit inconsistent and uneven. This will be mostly noticeable on vocals and cymbals.

7.6
Sound
Peaks/Dips
Peaks
1.29 db
Dips
1.87 db
8.1
Sound
Imaging
Weighted Group Delay
0.21
Weighted Amplitude Mismatch
0.79
Weighted Frequency Mismatch
3.11
Weighted Phase Mismatch
5.74

The imaging performance is very good. Their weighted group delay is at 0.21, which is very low. The GD graph also shows that the entire group delay response is below the audibility threshold. This ensures a tight bass and a transparent treble reproduction. Also, the L/R drivers of our test unit were well-matched in frequency, amplitude, and phase response. This is important for accurate placement and localization of objects, such as footsteps and instruments, in the stereo field.

4.2
Sound
Soundstage
PRTF Accuracy (Std. Dev.)
4.11 dB
PRTF Size (Avg.)
1.1 dB
PRTF Distance
4.33 dB
Openness
6.2
Acoustic Space Excitation
4.4

The soundstage of the Audio-Technica M60x is sub-par. This is typical and expected of closed-back on-ear headphones, since their ear cups are not large enough to interact with and activate the resonances of the pinna. This can also be seen in the PRTF graph of these headphones where their response lacks size and accuracy. Overall, the soundstage of these headphones will be relatively small and perceived to be located inside the listener's head.

8.2
Sound
Weighted Harmonic Distortion
WHD @ 90
0.224
WHD @ 100
0.070
Isolation
3.8
Isolation
Noise Isolation
Isolation Audio
Overall Attenuation
-9.12 dB
Bass
0.7 dB
Mid
-4.87 dB
Treble
-23.52 dB

The isolation performance of the Audio-Technica ATH-M60x is sub-par. These on-ear headphones do not have ANC (active noise cancellation), and therefore do not provide any isolation in the bass range. This means they will let in the rumble of airplane and bus engines, but this can be masked to a degree with loud music. In the mid-range, important for blocking out speech, they isolate by about 5dB, which is below-average. In the treble range, occupied by sharp sounds like S and Ts, they reduce outside noise by about 24dB, which is above-average.

6.5
Isolation
Leakage
Leakage Audio
Overall Leakage @ 1ft
42.52 dB

The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x have an average leakage performance. The significant portion of their leakage is spread across the mid and treble ranges, from 500Hz to 4KHz. This is a relatively broad range and means the leakage will be fuller sounding than that of in-ears and earbuds. The overall level of the leakage, however, is not very loud. With the music at 100dB SPL, their leakage at 1 foot away averages at 43dB SPL and peaks at 52dB SPL, which is just above the noise floor of an average office.

Microphone
Microphone
Microphone Style
Integrated
N/A
In-line
N/A
Boom
N/A
Detachable Boom
N/A

These headphones don't have a microphone. For a wired headphone with a good in-line microphone check out the Bose SoundTrue Around-Ear II, the QuietComfort 25 or the Apple EarPods.

0
Microphone
Recording Quality
Recorded Speech
N/A
LFE
N/A
FR Std. Dev.
N/A
HFE
N/A
Weighted THD
N/A
Gain
N/A

These headphones do not have a microphone and therefore, the recording quality has not been tested.

0
Microphone
Noise Handling
Speech + Pink Noise N/A
Speech + Subway Noise N/A
SpNR
N/A

These headphones do not have a microphone and therefore, the noise handling has not been tested.

Active Features
N/A
Active Features
Battery
Battery Type
N/A
Continuous Battery Life
N/A
Additional Charges
N/A
Total Battery Life
N/A
Charge Time
N/A
Power Saving Feature
N/A
Audio While Charging
N/A
Passive Playback
N/A
Charging Port N/A

These are passive headphones with no active components and no battery.

0
Active Features
App Support
App Name N/A
iOS N/A
Android N/A
macOS N/A
Windows N/A
Equalizer
N/A
ANC Control
N/A
Mic Control N/A
Room effects
N/A
Playback Control
N/A
Button Mapping N/A
Surround Sound N/A

The headphones do not have a dedicated, compatible app for added customization.

Connectivity
0
Connectivity
Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version
N/A
Multi-Device Pairing
N/A
NFC Pairing
N/A
Line of Sight Range
N/A
Default Latency
N/A
aptX Latency
N/A
aptX(LL) Latency
N/A

These headphones are wired and do not have a Bluetooth connection. If you want an on-ear design for critical listening in a wireless format the consider the Grado GW100.

These headphones do not have any latency since they are wired.

0
Connectivity
Non-Bluetooth Wireless
Non-BT Line of Sight Range
N/A
Non-BT Latency
N/A
9.5
Connectivity
Wired
Analog Audio
Yes
USB Audio
No
Detachable Yes
Length 3.8 ft
Connection 1/8" TRS
Wired Latency
0 ms

These headphones come with 3 audio cables with no in-line remote. This means they will provide audio when connected to your PS4 or Xbox One controller but do not have a microphone for voice chat.

Connectivity
PC / PS4 Compatibility
PC / PS4 Analog
Audio Only
PC / PS4 Wired USB
No
PC / PS4 Non-BT Wireless
No
Connectivity
Xbox One Compatibility
Xbox One Analog
Audio Only
Xbox One Wired USB
No
Xbox One Wireless
No
0
Connectivity
Base/Dock
Type
N/A
USB Input
N/A
Line In
N/A
Line Out
N/A
Optical Input
N/A
RCA Input
N/A
Dock Charging
N/A
Power Supply
N/A

The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x does not have a dock. If you need a headset with a dock that also has a wired connection for gaming or watching movies, then consider the SteelSeries Arctis 7.

Compared to other headphones

Comparison picture

The ATH-M60x are the first on-ear headphones in the ATH-M line up. They have a well-balanced sound for critical listening, although they will not sound quite as good as the ATH-M50x. They have a decently well made and compact on-ear design, and a cool looking build quality that some will prefer over the slightly bland look of the older ATH-M models. They're also decently comfortable for an on-ear and built well enough to withstand most use cases. Unfortunately, they will not be the ideal option for sports or outdoor use since they're not the most stable headphones, are wired and do not block a lot of noise. They also do not fold into a more compact format, which would have made them a lot more portable, when combined with their on-ear design. See our recommendations for the best on-ear headphones, the best on-ear wireless headphones, and the best noise cancelling headphones.

Audio-Technica ATH-M50x
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

The Audio-Technica ATH-M50x are overall better-sounding headphones than the Audio-Technica ATH-M60x. The M50x have a slightly more durable build quality and a more comfortable over-ear fit. They also sound a bit better balanced with a warmer sounding mid-range and more bass than the M60x. However, the M60x are a bit more compact with a modern on-ear look that some will prefer when compared to the M50x. They're also a bit more lightweight and better sounding than most on-ear designs.

Audio-Technica ATH-M70x
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

The Audio-Technica ATH-M70x are better headphones than the on-ear Audio-Technica ATH-M60x. The ATH-M70x are noticeably more comfortable and are also better built. Their sound profile follows our target curve more accurately but might be too sharp for some. They’ll also be more versatile, as their over-ear design will block out more high-frequency noise. If you feel like over-ears are too bulky and hard to carry around, the on-ear M60x might be a better option for you.

Marshall Major 2/Major II
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x are better headphones than the Marshall Major 2/Major II. The Audio-Technica have a better-balanced sound quality than the Marshall. They're also better built and look more premium and durable than the Marshall, and come with three sturdy and durable audio cables. On the upside, the Marshall have a limited in-line remote that gives you some control over your audio. They're also a lot more compact to carry around, being lighter, smaller, and more foldable than the Audio-Technica.

Koss Porta Pro KTC
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

The Audio Technica ATH-M60x are a much better critical listening on-ear than the Koss Porta Pro KTC. The Audio Technica have a better build quality, a better-balanced sound, and look much more premium and durable than the Koss. They also have replaceable cables and a closed-back design that isolate a little better in noise conditions. On the other hand, because the Koss are open, they deliver a larger soundstage than the Audio Technica. They're also more portable and come with an in-line remote variant that you can use with your phone, unlike the Audio Technica.

Beats EP
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

The Beats EP are a slightly better on-ear headset than the Audio-Technica ATH-M60x, but not by much. The Beats have an in-line remote that makes using them with iOS devices and mobile phones a little easier. They also have a slightly more compact and sturdy build quality, although not by much since they also do not fold into a more compact format. The Audio-Technica, on the other hand, come with three audio cables that make them a bit more suitable for a studio setting. They're also not as tight on the head as the Beats, although they're about the same comfort level. On the upside, the Audio-Technica have a slightly better-balanced sound that most will prefer over the EPs.

Bowers & Wilkins P5 Series 2
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

The Audio Technica ATH-M60x are better sounding on-ears than the Bowers & Wilkins P5 Serier 2. The Bowers & Wilkins have a much better build quality that not only feels more durable but also looks a lot more premium than the Audio Technica. The Bowers & Wilkins' design is also a bit more compact and easier to use with mobile devices since they come with an in-line remote. On the other hand, the Audio Technica have a better-balanced sound and a more comfortable on-ear fit. They also come with three audio cables which make them a bit more suitable for a recording studio.

+ Show more

Audio-Technica ATH-M60x Price

Recommended Articles

LOG IN

JOIN RTINGS.com

Be part of the most informed community and take advantage of our advanced tools to find the best product for your needs.
Join our mailing list:
Become an insider

Unlimited access to full product reviews, test measurements and scores

test table UI

Product prices across the site on reviews, tables and tools

product prices UI

Additional votes for our
next reviews

Additional votes UI

Early Access
to our reviews and test measurements

Early Access UI

Create Discussion