adidas Questar 4  Review

Reviewed Aug 12, 2026 at 03:24pm
Tested using Methodology v0.15 
adidas Questar 4

Track

5.9
Half/Full Marathon Racing 
5.7
5K/10K Racing 
7.0
Long Run 
7.5
Daily Training 

Track

 0

The adidas Questar 4 is a good entry-level daily trainer for runners who want a simple, budget-friendly shoe for everyday miles. It offers good cushioning and a stable ride that help it stand out in its category, though it feels heavy and lacks much energy underfoot. It's well-suited to easy runs and regular daily mileage, but its bulky, subdued ride makes it a poor fit for faster workouts.

✅ Buy If: ❌ Skip If:
  • You want a simple, no-frills trainer that gets the basics right.
  • You need a cushioned, stable shoe for easy daily miles.
  • You want a lively, nimble ride.
  • You regularly run faster workouts.

Our Verdict

5.9
Half/Full Marathon Racing 

The adidas Questar 4 is a sub-par option for half and full marathon racing. Its tall platform provides just enough protection, and its very good stability keeps the ride controlled over long distances, but the shoe is heavy and returns very little energy. This makes it much better suited to simply covering the distance than running it quickly.

Pros
  • Very stable platform stays controlled as fatigue sets in.

  • Cushioning remains adequate as the run gets longer.

Cons
  • Heavy build makes longer and faster efforts more taxing.

  • Very low rebound, leaving the ride flat.

  • Poor bending energy return leaves little punch at toe-off.

  • Modest forefoot rocker limits quick turnover.

5.7
5K/10K Racing 

The adidas Questar 4 is a sub-par option for 5K and 10K racing. Its firm forefoot provides a solid platform to push against, but the shoe is heavy and gives very little energy back at toe-off. The modest rocker and poor rebound also make it difficult to maintain a quick, lively turnover that help sustain fast race paces.

Pros
  • Firm forefoot provides a solid toe-off.

Cons
  • Heavy build makes longer and faster efforts more taxing.

  • Very low rebound, leaving the ride flat.

  • Modest forefoot rocker limits quick turnover.

7.0
Long Run 

The adidas Questar 4 is decent for long runs, particularly when comfort and control matter more than pace. Its cushioning provides reasonable protection, while the very stable platform stays reassuring as the miles add up. However, its heavy build and lifeless rebound can make longer efforts feel increasingly laborious.

Pros
  • Very stable platform stays controlled as fatigue sets in.

  • Cushioning remains adequate as the run gets longer.

Cons
  • Heavy build makes longer and faster efforts more taxing.

7.5
Daily Training 

The adidas Questar 4 is good for daily training, especially easy and steady mileage. Its very stable platform and decent cushioning make it comfortable and predictable for routine runs, while its natural, plate-free construction works well at relaxed paces. However, the substantial weight and very low energy return limit its versatility when you want to pick up the pace.

Pros
  • Very stable platform stays controlled as fatigue sets in.

  • Plate-free construction feels natural for daily mileage.

  • Heel rocker helps smooth transitions.

  • Firm heel keeps rearfoot landings very steady.

  • Wide base feels planted underfoot.

Cons
  • Heavy build makes longer and faster efforts more taxing.

  • Very low rebound, leaving the ride flat.

  • 5.9
    Half/Full Marathon Racing
  • 5.7
    5K/10K Racing
  • 7.0
    Long Run
  • 7.5
    Daily Training
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Aug 12, 2026: Review published.
    2.  Updated Aug 07, 2026: Early access published.
    3.  Updated Jul 24, 2026: Our testers have started testing this product.
    4.  Updated Jun 29, 2026: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.
    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We've bought and tested more than 250 running shoes. Every pair purchased with our own money, never supplied or sponsored by brands. Our data-driven tests are designed to go beyond marketing claims, and since every shoe goes through the exact same methodology, you can directly compare results to find the right pair for your needs. 

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    1.9

    Energy Return

    The adidas Questar 4 feels extremely lifeless underfoot. The midsole give back very little of the energy put into it, with the heel feeling especially dead. This makes the ride inefficient and noticeably less lively than most modern daily trainers.

    Pros
    Cons
    • Very low rebound, leaving the ride flat.

    2.2
    Forefoot Compression Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    68.1%

    Forefoot energy return is also very poor. The midsole gives little energy back after loading, so toe-offs feel muted rather than lively.

    1.1
    Heel Compression Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    65.1%

    This model has poor heel energy return. Like several of adidas’ entry-level trainers, including the adidas Adizero Pacer and adidas Runfalcon 6 CLOUDFOAM, the midsole gives very little energy back after being compressed, making rearfoot landings feel particularly flat.

    8.1

    Stability

    The adidas Questar 4 is very stable. Its firm heel and forefoot combine with a broad base to keep the tall platform well controlled from landing through toe-off. This planted feel is one of the shoe's biggest strengths for everyday mileage.

    Pros
    • Very stable platform stays controlled as fatigue sets in.

    • Firm forefoot provides a solid toe-off.

    • Firm heel keeps rearfoot landings very steady.

    • Wide base feels planted underfoot.

    Cons
    • Ungusseted tongue provides less midfoot lockdown.

    • Low forefoot height can feel restrictive vertically.

    • Ungusseted tongue provides less midfoot lockdown.

    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    92 mm (3.6")
    Outsole Arch Width
    75 mm (3.0")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    111 mm (4.4")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.41
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    3.56
    9.2
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    65.0 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    68.5 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    91.2 N/mm

    The heel is extremely firm. This creates a very stable landing platform, but it also makes rearfoot impacts feel hard and unforgiving.

    9.1
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    70.6 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    87.7 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    119 N/mm

    The forefoot is also very firm. It feels planted and stable at toe-off, but the rock-hard platform can also feel harsh underfoot, with a similarly rigid character to the adidas Supernova Rise 3.

    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Non-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    7.0

    Cushioning

    The adidas Questar 4 provides decent cushioning for daily mileage. The forefoot feels more protective than the heel, and while the ride isn't especially plush, there's enough impact protection to make it one of the rare basic daily trainers that's still an acceptable option for longer runs.

    Pros
    • Cushioning remains adequate as the run gets longer.

    Cons
    • Cushioning doesn't feel truly plush.

    6.7
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    2.54 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    8.65 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    15.47 J

    Heel cushioning is mediocre overall. Runners who load the midsole more heavily should find it relatively plusher and get more out of the available cushioning, while lighter runners may experience the heel as firmer and less protective.

    7.3
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    4.34 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    7.92 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    11.87 J

    Forefoot cushioning is decent overall, though its behavior is almost the opposite of the heel. Lighter runners or slower paces should find it reasonably protective, while greater forces expose the limits of the lower forefoot stack and make it feel noticeably harsher.

    6.9
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    7.55 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    7.37 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    7.25 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    7.16 J

    Forefoot protection is only adequate as runs get longer, but that still makes the adidas Questar 4 unusually capable for an entry-level trainer. Other basic models, such as the Nike Downshifter 14, can feel too underprotected for sustained mileage, whereas this shoe has enough cushioning to remain a viable option for longer runs.

    3.5

    Bounciness

    The adidas Questar 4 has a poor amount of bounce. The midsole doesn't compress especially deeply, and what compression it does provide translates into very little rebound. As a result, the shoe feels muted rather than dynamic with each step.

    Pros
    Cons
    • Very low rebound, leaving the ride flat.

    4.5
    Heel Compression Depth
    Heel Compression At 550N
    8.5 mm
    Heel Compression At 1100N
    16.1 mm
    Heel Compression At 1900N
    20.8 mm

    The heel doesn't compress very deeply. This limits the amount of sinking and rebound underfoot, so it lacks the trampoline-like sensation of softer, more compressive midsoles.

    5.0
    Forefoot Compression Depth
    Forefoot Compression At 800N
    11.3 mm
    Forefoot Compression At 1300N
    14.8 mm
    Forefoot Compression At 2050N
    17.3 mm

    The forefoot doesn't compress a lot. There's some give under load, but not enough to create a particularly soft or bouncy sensation as the foam decompresses.

    6.3

    Snappiness

    The adidas Questar 4 has mediocre snappiness. Its firm forefoot and moderate stiffness give you a reasonably solid platform to push against, but poor bending energy return and a fairly modest rocker prevent it from feeling particularly quick or propulsive.

    Pros
    • Firm forefoot provides a solid toe-off.

    Cons
    • Modest forefoot rocker limits quick turnover.

    3.7
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    Forefoot Bending Energy Return
    52.4%

    The forefoot gives little energy back as it unbends. It therefore lacks the springy rebound that can make a stiff forefoot feel truly propulsive.

    7.0
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    Forefoot Bending Stiffness
    8.8 N/mm
    Forefoot Bending Force
    356 N

    The forefoot resists bending quite a lot, mainly because of the very firm midsole rather than a plate or other stiffening element. However, that stiffness doesn't translate into a particularly snappy feel at toe-off.

    7.1
    Forefoot Rocker Geometry
    Toe Spring
    49 mm (1.9")
    Toe Apex Position
    66.2%
    Forefoot Rocker Angle
    26.1°

    The forefoot rocker is decent. It isn’t especially steep, but the curve starts fairly early, helping the shoe roll forward quite a bit despite its firm, relatively stiff platform.

    7.2

    Roll

    The adidas Questar 4 rolls decently through each stride. Its relatively pronounced heel and forefoot rocker help guide the foot forward smoothly enough, though the geometry isn't aggressive enough to create a particularly fast or effortless transition.

    Pros
    • Heel rocker helps smooth transitions.

    • Forefoot geometry provides a decently smooth roll.

    Cons
    • Modest forefoot rocker limits quick turnover.

    7.0
    Rocker Stiffness
    Force To Flatten The Rocker
    85 N

    The rocker is quite stiff. That resistance helps the shoe maintain its shape through the stride and gives the otherwise conventional geometry a more guided rollover sensation.

    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    38.2 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    31.2 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    7.0 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    6.0 mm

    The adidas Questar 4 features a moderate stack height and heel-to-toe drop, giving it a relatively conventional platform. This makes it well-suited to beginner runners seeking a smooth, reassuring ride without an overly aggressive geometry.

    7.5
    Heel Rocker Geometry
    Heel Spring
    21 mm (0.8")
    Heel Apex Position
    17.6%
    Heel Rocker Angle
    22.0°

    The heel has good rocker geometry. Its noticeable curve helps guide landings forward and contributes to smoother transitions into midstance.

    9.3

    True To Size

    The adidas Questar 4 fits true to size overall. Its length and width are very well aligned with standard sizing, with enough space through the arch and forefoot. The main exception is the low forefoot height, which can feel somewhat restrictive for runners who need more vertical toe-box room. Still, most runners can confidently go for their usual size.

    Pros
    • Length is spot-on.

    • Forefoot and arch widths closely match the reference fit.

    Cons
    • Low forefoot height can feel restrictive if you have high toes.

    10
    Length Fit
    8.6
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
    5.9 mm (0.232")
    Toe TTS Deviation
    0.7 mm (0.026")
    9.9
    Arch Fit: Width
    Arch Width TTS Deviation
    1.4 mm (0.054")
    5.5
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -5.3 mm (-0.210")

    The forefoot is quite low. Runners with higher-volume feet may feel some pressure over the toes. Most runners can still pick their usual size.

    Additional Tests
    4.1
    Design
    Weight
    Weight
    305.5 g (10.78 oz)

    The adidas Questar 4 is heavy for a daily trainer. It also carries more weight than some of adidas’ other entry-level options, like the adidas Zenboost and adidas Adizero Pacer, which contributes to its more cumbersome feel when picking up the pace.

    Design
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    277 mm (10.9")
    Internal Heel Width
    61 mm (2.4")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    98 mm (3.9")
    Wide Sizing Available
    No
    Design
    Foam
    Primary Foam Name
    Cloudfoam+
    Primary Foam Type
    EVA
    Secondary Foam Name
    N/A
    Secondary Foam Type
    N/A

    The adidas Questar 4 uses Cloudfoam+ throughout its midsole. This entry-level foam, composed of EVA, prioritizes a firm, stable platform feel over the soft or energetic feel found in adidas’ more performance-oriented compounds.

    Design
    Laces
    Lace Type
    Flat
    Width
    6.0 mm (0.2")
    Thickness
    2.0 mm (0.1")
    Stretch
    7.5%

    The shoe uses standard flat laces with little stretch. They provide a straightforward, secure hold without much give.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The adidas Questar 4 is a standout among entry-level trainers if you don't want to spend much but still want a shoe designed primarily for running, rather than a lifestyle sneaker that can also handle the occasional run. It's better than most basic daily trainers because it combines decent cushioning with a very stable ride, helping your legs feel more protected and making it a good option if you're new to running. Within adidas' lineup, the Adizero Pacer is usually cheaper, but it's not as capable a daily trainer overall. The Zenboost is another good, inexpensive option if you prefer more ground feel and a nimbler ride, but it gives up some cushioning. If you can stretch your budget a little bit, consider the adidas Adizero Evo SL, a much more capable and versatile trainer overall. 

    For more options from the brand, check out our picks for the best adidas running shoes. If you're looking to save a few bucks, check out our recommendations for the best budget running shoes.

    adidas Adizero Pacer

    Track

    The adidas Adizero Pacer and adidas Questar 4 are two entry-level budget trainers from the German brand. The Questar 4 is the better daily trainer overall, thanks to its more cushioned, stable ride, making it the better choice for most runners. The Pacer isn't far behind, though, and its lower weight makes it worth considering if you can find it for substantially less.

    adidas Zenboost

    Track

    The adidas Zenboost and Questar 4 are both good budget daily trainers, but they suit different runners. Get the Zenboost if you mainly run shorter distances and prefer more ground feel, a livelier ride, and a nimbler feel underfoot. Get the Questar 4 if cushioning is the priority and you want a more protective shoe that's better suited to extending your runs.

    New Balance Fresh Foam 520v9

    Track

    The New Balance Fresh Foam 520v9 and adidas Questar 4 are both budget shoes, but the adidas is the better daily training option overall. It provides much better impact protection and a smoother ride, so it's the better choice if you'll be running regularly. The New Balance is lighter and more stable, though, and it comes in wider sizes, making it the better pick for mixed use or wider feet.

     

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We bought and tested the adidas Questar 4 in men's U.S. size 9, in the Cloud White / Iron Metallic / Lucid Tangerine colorway. Here's the label for our pair. You can also buy the shoe in several other color options, depending on your region and whether you buy it in men's or women's sizing. The design section applies specifically to the version we tested, but we expect other sizes and gender variants to perform similarly.