Brooks Launch 12  Running Shoe Review

Review updated Mar 24, 2026 at 09:26am
Tested using Methodology v0.10 
Brooks Launch 12

Track

5.6
Marathon Racing 
6.8
5K/10K Racing 
5.9
Energy Return 
6.4
Cushioning 
7.6
Lateral Stability 
9.6
True To Size 

Track

 0

The Brooks Launch 12 is a no-nonsense daily trainer that's a good fit for runners who don't enjoy the very tall, unstable platforms that now dominate much of the market. It uses Brooks' nitrogen-infused DNA FLASH cushioning with DNA FLASH v2 in the forefoot, which gives it a light bounce at toe-off while still preserving some ground feel up front, helping the ride stay approachable and predictable. This iteration features a bit more stack than before and a mesh upper with more padding around the heel for an improved step-in feel, even if that comes with increased weight. The Launch line used to sit more clearly as one of Brooks' lightweight daily training options alongside the Hyperion family, but as that category keeps losing relevance, this model has had to shift toward more comfort. The shoe also feels naturally stable without relying on corrective features, which adds to its easygoing appeal for newer runners or those who prefer a more traditional underfoot experience.

Our Verdict

5.6
Marathon Racing 

The Brooks Launch 12 isn't really built for marathon racing. It's too low-stack, only a little bit cushioned, and not very bouncy, so it lacks the deep protection and easy propulsion that matter over long distances. The stable platform helps it feel controlled and predictable, but with no plate and a geometry that's not meant for racing, it's more like a daily trainer you could complete a marathon in than one designed to help you race your best.

Pros
  • Very good lateral stability.

  • Heel cushioning offers reasonable protection.

Cons
  • Minimal energy return overall.

  • The forefoot can feel thin and harsh, especially under high loads.

  • Weight could be lower for more efficient running.

6.8
5K/10K Racing 

The Brooks Launch 12 can work reasonably well for 5K or 10K racing if you like a firmer, more traditional racing feel. Its low, firm forefoot helps it turn over cleanly and keeps the ride direct, but the midsole does not return much energy, and there's no plate to add extra snap. It's more of a simple, relatively nimble option for shorter runs than a truly aggressive modern racer you'd want to lace up when you have a personal best in mind.

Pros
  • Firm forefoot keeps transitions predictable and direct.

Cons
  • Minimal energy return overall.

  • Weight could be lower for more efficient running.

5.9
Energy Return 

The Brooks Launch 12 delivers a very modest amount of energy return. There's a very tiny bit of liveliness under the forefoot, but the heel, built with DNA FLASH, feels a lot less lively, so the ride doesn't feel propulsive overall. For daily training, this keeps things predictable, but runners expecting a bouncy, fun sensation will likely find it underwhelming.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Minimal energy return overall.

6.4
Cushioning 

The Brooks Launch 12's cushioning feels adequate for short daily runs. There's enough padding under the heel for everyday mileage, but the forefoot feels noticeably thinner and keeps more ground feel than most other modern daily trainers. That makes the ride more connected and less bulky, though runners looking for a soft, deeply protective shoe for easy days or long runs may find they feel too much of the road under their feet for their liking.

Pros
  • Heel cushioning offers reasonable protection.

Cons
  • The forefoot can feel thin and harsh, especially under high loads.

7.6
Lateral Stability 

The Brooks Launch 12 is very stable overall. Its broad platform, moderate stack height, and firmer forefoot help it feel planted and controlled without relying on any corrective features, which makes it especially reassuring for runners who dislike tall, tippy midsoles. It doesn't try to guide your foot like a support shoe, but it offers a dependable, naturally stable ride.

Pros
  • Very good lateral stability.

  • Firm forefoot keeps transitions predictable and direct.

Cons
None
9.6
True To Size 

The Brooks Launch 12 fits true to size overall, and most people should stick to their usual size. The length feels spot on, and the forefoot and arch width are both quite accommodating. The main caveat is that the toe box height is somewhat shallow, so runners with higher-volume feet may feel a bit of pressure over the top of the forefoot.

Pros
  • True-to-size length.

  • Accommodating width at the forefoot.

Cons
  • Shallow toe box.

  • 5.6
    Marathon Racing
  • 6.8
    5K/10K Racing

  • Performance Usages

  • 5.9
    Energy Return
  • 6.4
    Cushioning
  • 7.6
    Lateral Stability
  • 9.6
    True To Size
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Mar 24, 2026: 

      Following Test Bench 0.10, we wrote the full review with the most recent testing and results available.

    2.  Updated Feb 20, 2026: We've converted this review to Test Bench 0.10, adding a new set of fit tests to the Design section and an overall fit performance usage. Check out the details in our changelog.
    3.  Updated Feb 16, 2026: Review published.
    4.  Updated Jan 19, 2026: Our testers have started testing this product.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We bought and tested the Brooks Launch 12 in men's US size 9, as noted on the label for our pair. The pair we purchased is the Black/Cyber Yellow/Oyster colorway, but you can also buy this shoe in several other colors, including Black/Grey/White, Gray Mist/Green, Coconut/Sand/Skyway, and more, depending on the region. The Brooks Launch 12 is only available in a standard width, with no wide variants available. The design section applies only to the exact model we tested, but we expect other size variants to perform similarly.

    Popular Running Shoe Comparisons

    The Brooks Launch 12 is a low-profile daily trainer that now makes more sense as a simple, stable option for everyday running than as the lightweight trainer that earlier versions built their reputation on. The market has evolved so much that when runners reach for a faster shoe for their workouts today, they have far more compelling choices, whether that means plated trainers like the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5, low-to-the-ground modern racing-flat alternatives like the adidas Adizero Adios 9, versatile trainers like the ASICS MEGABLAST, or even full super shoes. That leaves traditional lightweight trainers like the Launch in a difficult spot, since they no longer feel lightweight or responsive enough to stand out for speed sessions, so the category has had to shift toward slower daily mileage by adding more stack, comfort, and protection, even if this means more weight.

    At the same time, the Launch 12 still stops well short of the premium feel of max-cushion options like the HOKA Skyward X or Nike Vomero Premium, which is also exactly why it still works well for runners who want some ground feel, a straightforward design, a naturally stable platform, and a no-fuss ride that will not break the bank.

    The Brooks Hyperion line has gone through a similar evolution, especially with the move from the Brooks Hyperion 2 to the Brooks Hyperion 3, so there is no real stripped-back lightweight trainer left in Brooks' lineup anymore. Meanwhile, the Brooks Revel 8 is the simpler option for runners doing a mix of walking and running, the Brooks Ghost 17 is the classic legacy trainer, while those who want more protection are better served by premium trainers like the Brooks Glycerin 23, Brooks Glycerin Max, or Brooks Ghost Max.

    For more options, check out our recommendations for the best Brooks running shoes, as well as our picks for the best running shoes overall and the best long-distance running shoes.

    HOKA Clifton 10

    Track

    The Brooks Launch 12 and HOKA Clifton 10 are both daily trainers, but they go about that role in different ways. The HOKA is the more cushioned and higher-stacked option, focusing on comfort, smoothness, and a protective ride while still feeling quite stable for its category. The Brooks is lighter and a bit more stable, with a lower stack and more ground feel as soon as you step in, which makes it feel less protective but a bit more connected to the road. It also has a touch more bounce in the forefoot, giving it a slightly livelier feel when you start to turn over.

    Brooks Ghost 17

    Track

    The Brooks Launch 12 and Brooks Ghost 17 are two popular Brooks trainers that work well for easier running and a mix of running and walking. The Ghost 17 is the more classic daily trainer, continuing a long-standing formula with a very stable ride created by its wide platform, raised sidewalls, and a reinforced heel counter, though all of that also makes it feel heavier. The Launch 12 sits a bit lower and uses an 8 mm drop (instead of the Ghost 17's 10 mm), and its dual-layer midsole gives it a slightly bouncier and more absorbent feel underfoot despite the lower stack. In fit, both feel true to size and accommodating overall, but the Ghost 17 feels narrower through the arch, while the Launch 12 has a shallower toe box.

    Brooks Hyperion 3

    Track

    The Brooks Hyperion 3 and Brooks Launch 12 are two trainers whose earlier versions used to feel lighter and more stripped down, but both have gradually shifted toward a more comfort-oriented identity and now sit in a similar weight range. The Hyperion 3 is the more protective trainer, with a slightly higher stack, a marginally wider platform, and a touch more inherent stability that helps it feel more capable overall. The Launch 12 feels firmer and more connected to the ground, with a bit more forefoot liveliness that gives it a snappier sensation despite offering less protection. If you want the more balanced and comfortable option for daily training, the Hyperion 3 makes more sense, but if you prefer a firmer ride with more ground feel and a slightly punchier forefoot, the Launch 12 is the better fit.

    How We Test Running Shoes
    How We Test Running Shoes

    We buy and test running shoes with a very data-oriented approach. While we're just getting started, our methodology already has dozens of tests to help you make the right purchasing decision for your needs. Not only do we use high-end equipment to gather objective data, but we also order multiple sizes of the same shoes so team members can log in miles. This real-world testing is conducted at various paces and conditions, across different types of workouts, to cover all the bases. This allows us to verify our results and ensure they align with what you might feel with a specific pair.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    6.7
    Weight
    Weight
    243.9 g (8.60 oz)
    Stack Heights
    Heel Stack Height
    34.3 mm
    Forefoot Stack Height
    26.2 mm
    Heel-To-Toe Drop
    8.1 mm
    Advertised Heel-To-Toe Drop
    8.0 mm
    External Shape
    Outsole Heel Width
    85 mm (3.3")
    Outsole Arch Width
    67 mm (2.7")
    Outsole Forefoot Width
    111 mm (4.4")
    Heel Width-To-Stack Ratio
    2.48
    Forefoot Width-To-Stack Ratio
    4.24
    Internal Shape
    Internal Length
    281 mm (11.1")
    Internal Heel Width
    65 mm (2.6")
    Internal Forefoot Width
    90 mm (3.5")
    Wide Sizing Available
    No
    9.8
    Forefoot Fit: Width
    Ball-Of-Foot TTS Deviation
    1.7 mm (0.067")
    Toe TTS Deviation
    0.5 mm (0.020")
    4.5
    Forefoot Fit: Height
    Toe TTS Deviation
    -6.5 mm (-0.255")
    9.7
    Arch Fit: Width
    Arch Width TTS Deviation
    -0.9 mm (-0.034")
    10
    Length Fit
    Other Features
    Tongue Gusset Type
    Non-gusseted
    Plate
    None
    Performance
    4.5
    Heel Energy Return
    Heel Energy Return
    71.3%
    6.5
    Forefoot Energy Return
    Forefoot Energy Return
    74.5%
    6.9
    Heel Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 550N
    2.92 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1100N
    8.65 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1900N
    15.20 J
    5.8
    Forefoot Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 800N
    3.61 J
    Energy Absorbed At 1300N
    6.17 J
    Energy Absorbed At 2050N
    9.14 J
    5.7
    Heel Firmness
    Firmness At 550N
    53.3 N/mm
    Firmness At 1100N
    114.6 N/mm
    Firmness At 1900N
    238.7 N/mm
    8.9
    Forefoot Firmness
    Firmness At 800N
    143.2 N/mm
    Firmness At 1300N
    281.2 N/mm
    Firmness At 2050N
    525.0 N/mm
    5.1
    Forefoot Long Run Cushioning
    Energy Absorbed At 10km
    5.68 J
    Energy Absorbed At 20km
    5.49 J
    Energy Absorbed At 30km
    5.38 J
    Energy Absorbed At 40km
    5.29 J