JBL Tune 520BT  Headphones Review

Reviewed May 27, 2024 at 03:41pm
Writing modified Dec 17, 2025 at 09:50am
Tested using Methodology v2.0 
JBL Tune 520BT
6.5
Sports And Fitness 
5.8
Travel 
5.8
Office Work 
5.8
Wireless Gaming (In Development) 
5.5
Wired Gaming (In Development) 
6.8
Audio Reproduction Accuracy 
4.2
Noise Isolation 
6.5
Microphone (In Development) 
 0
Current Deal: The JBL Tune 520BT has dropped in price by $30.00 at Amazon.com.
SEE DEAL
  1. Recommended in:
  2. On-Ear
  3. JBL

The JBL Tune 520BT Wireless on-ear headphones represent the evolution of the previous JBL Tune 510BT Wireless. They're simple Bluetooth headphones with improved battery life compared to the last generation. Despite landing in a pretty budget-friendly tier, they have app support to expand their utility. Let's see how they stack up and determine if they meet your needs.

Our Verdict

6.5
Sports And Fitness 

The JBL Tune 520BT are fair for sports and fitness. While they have a few good traits, such as their smaller form factor, lightweight, and easy-to-access button controls, they're not stable headphones. As on-ears, they don't grip tight enough for you to perform most exercises without needing to monitor the headphones from shifting around.

Pros
  • Long battery life.
  • Intuitive controls.
  • Parametric EQ.
Cons
  • Plasticky build.
  • Too unstable for most exercises.
  • Not very comfortable for long sessions.
5.8
Travel 

The JBL Tune 520BT are sub-par for travel use. Their long battery life will get you through many long trips without a recharge, and their dedicated controls make playback easy. However, their noise isolation is poor, so you'll hear the rumbling of the bus, your fellow travelers' conversations, and squealing brakes. They're also not very comfortable, and despite their smaller on-ear design, they don't have a case to stow them away.

Pros
  • Comprehensive app support.
  • Long battery life.
Cons
  • Poor isolation.
  • Plasticky build.
  • Not very comfortable for long sessions.
5.8
Office Work 

The JBL Tune 520BT are disappointing for office use. They're lightweight and don't clamp too hard, but they're not very comfortable and barely block out much office noise at all, leaving you at the mercy of your coworkers. However, they have a long battery life, so they'll easily last you through a week or more. If you take a lot of meetings, their mic isn't the most professional-sounding, but it captures your speech fine.

Pros
  • Comprehensive app support.
Cons
  • Poor isolation.
  • Not very comfortable for long sessions.
  • Mic noise handling is just okay.
5.8
Wireless Gaming (In Development) 

The JBL 520BT aren't suitable for wireless gaming because they connect via Bluetooth only, and their latency is too high even in video mode when used for mobile games.

5.5
Wired Gaming (In Development) 

The JBL 520BT are Bluetooth-only headphones and don't have any wired connection.

6.8
Audio Reproduction Accuracy 

The JBL 520BT are okay for audio reproduction accuracy. Their frequency response mostly follows the balanced sound profile, with some minor fluctuations in the treble range. However, their poor frequency response consistency makes achieving a consistent L/R driver balance tricky. They also have high group delay in the low-bass range, though their inability to reproduce these frequencies means you won't notice this affecting the sound.

4.2
Noise Isolation 

The JBL 520BT's noise isolation performance is poor. They lack an ANC system, and their closed-back enclosure offers only a limited amount of treble range attenuation, leaving you at the mercy of construction noise and airplane engine rumble. They don't leak too much audio, though, so you're unlikely to bother anyone around you unless you're really blasting your tunes.

6.5
Microphone (In Development) 

The JBL 520BT have a reasonable microphone performance. The mic captures your voice well enough that you're easily understandable, although it rolls off both bass and treble-range frequencies, resulting in a boxy sound. It does a passable job of separating your voice from its background, though background audio is still clearly audible and competes with your voice for clarity.

4.8
Frequency Response Consistency 

The JBL 520BT have poor frequency response consistency. The headphones' design and the material used for the ear cups make it very difficult to achieve a solid seal. This issue is further compounded if you wear glasses, which can obstruct the seal, or have a head that's anything but average size. All in all, they require a significant amount of adjustment to achieve optimal audio delivery, which can be a hassle.

  • 6.5
    Sports And Fitness
  • 5.8
    Travel
  • 5.8
    Office Work
  • 5.8
    Wireless Gaming (In Development)
  • 5.5
    Wired Gaming (In Development)

  • Performance Usages

  • 6.8
    Audio Reproduction Accuracy
  • 4.2
    Noise Isolation
  • 6.5
    Microphone (In Development)
  • 4.8
    Frequency Response Consistency
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Dec 17, 2025: 

      This review has been updated to Test Bench 2.0, which adds the following tests: Stereo Mismatch, Group Delay, Cumulative Spectral Decay, PRTF, Harmonic Distortion, and Electrical Aspects. We've also made changes to the text in the usage boxes.

    2.  Updated Dec 15, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.0, which updates our sound tests and adds performance usages. You can read more about this in our changelog.
    3.  Updated Jan 03, 2025: 

      Several Sound tests have been updated following Test Bench 1.8. There have also been text changes made throughout the review, including to the usages and product comparisons to match these results.

    4.  Updated Dec 16, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.8, which updates our target curve and Sound tests. You can read more about this in our changelog.

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    The JBL Tune 520BT come in 'Black,' 'Blue,' 'Purple,' and 'White.' Our unit is the 'Blue' variant, and you can see the labels here and here. Besides color, they're all the same model and expected to function the same.

    If you come across another variant of these headphones, please let us know in the comments, and we'll update our review.

    Popular Headphones Comparisons

    The JBL Tune 520BT Wireless are similarly priced to the JBL Tune 510BT Wireless, but the Tune 510BT have a slightly better mic and are limited without a companion app. Consider the Sony WH-CH520 Wireless on-ears, which are roughly at the same price point and offer virtual surround sound support for a more immersive experience. At a slightly pricier tier, the Pioneer DJ HDJ-CUE1BT Wireless feel more comfortable and are built better. Unlike the Tune 520BT, you can use them wirelessly or wired. However, they don't have EQ, and they charge via the older Micro-USB port. Keep in mind that the JBL Tune 520BT's battery life outlasts all of these on-ear models.

    For more options, check out the best budget wireless headphones, the best on-ear headphones, and the best JBL earbuds and headphones to see what else the brand is doing.

    Sony WH-CH520 Wireless

    The Sony WH-CH520 Wireless and the JBL Tune 520BT share more than the number '520.' Both headphones are lightweight and fit on-ears with app support and multi-device pairing despite being budget-tier. Overall, the Sony are slightly better than the JBL, but it's close enough that prices can easily decide which pair is better. The Sony include the brand's virtual soundstage, which requires a compatible streaming service like TIDAL, and their mic sounds better. They're also slightly better made. The JBL don't have any virtual soundstage compatibility. However, they have a longer battery life and shorter latency with video mode, but latency depends quite a bit on devices, so your experience may vary. 

    JBL Tune 510BT

    The JBL Tune 520BT are the updated version of the JBL Tune 510BT. The Tune 520BT have a much longer battery life and support the brand's app for greater flexibility, including an equalizer. On the other hand, both headphones have many of the same features, like button controls, and are similarly lightweight with unstable on-ear fits. That said, the Tune 510BT have a better-sounding microphone. Otherwise, they're very alike.

    Sony WH-CH510 Wireless

    Overall, the JBL Tune 520BT are better than the Sony WH-CH510 Wireless. The Sony sound fairly similar to the JBL out of the box, but only the JBL have app compatibility with an EQ to adjust the sound to your tastes. The JBL cans also have a significantly longer battery life and take half as long as the Sony to fully recharge. While neither has an impressive microphone, the JBL includes a sidetone you can adjust so you can hear yourself, or not, during a call. The JBL also support multi-device pairing, and the Sony cans don't. The Sony are slightly more stable-fitting, but they're otherwise more stripped back.

    Anker Soundcore Life Q20 Wireless

    If you want active noise cancelling (ANC), the Anker Soundcore Life Q20 Wireless are better than the JBL Tune 520BT in that regard. While the JBL fit on-ears and can only passively isolate, they have other features missing from the Anker headphones, such as multi-device pairing with lower latency and a comprehensive app that includes an equalizer. Their battery also lasts about twice as long. On the other hand, the Anker headphones have a better mic, support both Bluetooth and wired listening, and are more comfortable. Still, you can't change the very bassy sound profile on the Anker, which can be a dealbreaker. However, depending on your needs, the Anker's ANC can outweigh the upsides of the JBL headphones.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Sound
    Sound Profile
    See details on graph tool
    Normalization Frequency
    1,000 Hz
    Bass Amount
    Slightly Underemphasized (-2 dB)
    Treble Amount
    Slightly Underemphasized (-2 dB)
    Sound Signature
    Balanced

    The JBL Tune 520BT have a balanced sound profile that rolls off some treble range. 

    If you use the headphones for calls, they sound quite different; here's a comparison with the default sound profile. This works fine for voices, but if you're on a video call with others sharing media, music will lack a lot of boom, while high-treble frequencies are severely cut, leaving a warm and not detailed sound.

    The headphones' companion app includes an EQ with seven presets. You can create your own, too. If you leave the EQ flat, it's the same as the headphones' default frequency response. We also observed that our unit has one driver that's quieter than the other, which we corrected somewhat using the L/R channel balance function in the app.

    4.8
    Frequency Response Consistency
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Std. Deviation
    1.92 dB

    Their frequency response consistency is poor. The combination of the earpads' material and stiff hinges can make it challenging to achieve a good seal. You'll want to take the time to force the hinges to apply even pressure against your ears. If you wear glasses or have a larger head than average, you may struggle to achieve a proper seal and fit, resulting in an uneven delivery of bass and treble. 

    Raw Frequency Response
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    8.4
    Bass Profile: Target Compliance
    See details on graph tool
    RMS Deviation From Target
    3.6 dB
    Low-Frequency Extension
    23.79 Hz
    Low Bass
    -4.09 dB
    Mid Bass
    1.04 dB
    High Bass
    -0.22 dB

    The bass compliance is great. The headphones roll off low-bass, so they're not especially rumbly, but the boom of a kick drum sits prominently in the mix. As a result, the walking bassline, kick, and toms during post-punk songs like Academy Fight Song by Mission of Burma sound weighty. For genres like EDM and dubstep, the low-bass doesn't quite have the depth you might wish for, but for the most part, you'll hear a good amount of thump.

    9.3
    Mid-Range Profile: Target Compliance
    See details on graph tool
    RMS Deviation From Target
    1.16 dB
    Low Mid
    -0.52 dB
    Mid-Mid
    -0.13 dB
    High Mid
    -1.39 dB

    Their mid-range target compliance is outstanding. The entire range is virtually flat, so instruments like keys and guitars sound true to life. Only a gradual roll-off in the high-mid pushes the presence of vocals down in the mix slightly.

    8.5
    Treble Profile: Target Compliance
    See details on graph tool
    RMS Deviation From Target
    2.94 dB
    Low Treble
    -1.19 dB
    Mid Treble
    -2.98 dB
    High Treble
    -7.55 dB

    These headphones have excellent treble compliance, though they're somewhat inconsistent. A dip and a peak in the low-treble can make voices sound close or far depending on the note being sung, while a dip in the mid-treble can make cymbals sound a bit dull.

    7.5
    Peaks/Dips
    See details on graph tool
    Peaks
    1.43 dB
    Dips
    1.66 dB

    The JBL Tune 520BT have a good peaks and dips performance, indicating they control their sound profile well. Most of the deviation occurs in the treble range, with a series of peaks and dips making vocals sound harsh, dull, or piercing depending on their pitch.

    6.1
    Stereo Mismatch
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Weighted Amplitude Mismatch
    0.86 dB
    Weighted Frequency Response Mismatch
    1.80 dB
    Weighted Phase Mismatch
    3.0°

    The stereo mismatch performance is passable. The L/R drivers are mostly well-matched in terms of amplitude, phase, and frequency response. While there are some deviations in amplitude across the frequency range, which can mostly be attributed to the inconsistent fit, they're not particularly drastic in any one frequency band. As a result, they're not very audible with real-life audio content.

    3.5
    Group Delay
    See details on graph tool
    Weighted Group Delay
    2.0 ms

    These headphones feature some fluctuations in the group delay in the low-bass range. However, given they struggle to reproduce these frequencies anyway, these fluctuations aren't audible in everyday content.

    6.5
    PRTF
    See details on graph tool
    PRTF Accuracy (RMS Deviation)
    5.11 dB
    PRTF Size (Avg.)
    4.72 dB
    PRTF Distance
    12.46 dB

    The JBL Tune 520BT have an okay PRTF performance. While they can convey some sense of space, they don't meaningfully interact with your outer ear or the room you're in while wearing them. As a result, your audio sounds focused, as if it's coming from inside your head, rather than from the room itself.

    8.2
    Harmonic Distortion
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    WHD @ 94 dB SPL
    0.14%
    WHD @ 104 dB SPL
    0.53%

    Their harmonic distortion performance is great. There's no audible coloration of the audio signal at both regular and elevated listening levels. 

    Electrical Aspects
    Sensitivity @1kHz-1V
    N/A
    Bluetooth Max SPL
    101.7 dB
    0.0
    Virtual Soundstage
    Head Modeling
    No
    Speaker Modeling
    No
    Room Ambience
    No
    Head Tracking
    No
    Virtual Surround
    No
    Test Settings
    Firmware
    3.5.0
    Power
    On
    Connection
    Bluetooth
    Codec
    SBC, 16-bit, 48kHz
    Test InstrumentAudio Precision APx517B
    EQ
    No EQ
    ANC
    No ANC
    Tip/Pad
    Default
    Microphone
    Integrated

    These are the settings used to test the JBL Tune 520BT. Our results are only valid in this configuration.

    Design
    Style
    TypeOn-ear
    EnclosureClosed-Back
    WirelessYes
    TransducerDynamic

    The JBL Tune 520BT are monochromatic on-ear headphones, with a very similar look to the JBL Tune 510BT Wireless. Their yokes integrate into the ear cup's housing, and their matte and shiny smooth plastic textures add some visual interest. Your color options include 'Black,' 'Blue,' 'Purple,' and 'White.'

    6.5
    Comfort
    Weight0.35 lbs
    Clamping Force
    0.7 lbs

    The JBL Tune 520BT feel okay for comfort. They're very lightweight, so their insubstantial padding along the headband isn't too noticeable when you wear them. Their yokes swivel horizontally, and the ear cups' vertical range of motion is good to fit on different head and ear shapes, but they're stiff and can distribute clamping force unevenly. The ear cups are shallow, so your ears can push up against the driver's grille. Lastly, the friction of your ears rubbing against the faux leather padding makes an unpleasant scratching sound when you walk around.

    7.1
    Controls
    OS Compatibility
    Not OS specific
    Ease Of UseGood
    FeedbackGood
    Call/Music ControlYes
    Volume ControlYes
    Microphone ControlMute/Unmute
    Channel Mixing
    No
    Noise Cancelling ControlNo
    Talk-Through
    No
    Additional ControlsVoice Assistant

    Their four-button control scheme is decent. All but two of the buttons have distinctly different shapes, allowing you to differentiate them for the most part. However, while they're clicky, allowing you to sense when you've input a command, the buttons feel a bit loose and shift around in their housings. They chime when you minimize or maximize the volume, and a voice prompts you during pairing mode, but there are no other sound indicators.

    '+' button:

    • Single press: Raises volume.
    • Press-and-hold: Skips to the next track.

    '-' button:

    • Single press: Lowers volume.
    • Press-and-hold: Skips to the previous track.

    Multi-function button:

    • Single press: Play/pause playback. Answer/reject incoming call.
    • Press-and-hold: Activates voice assistant. Mute/unmute the microphone during a call.

    Power button:

    • Double press: Power on/off.
    • Press-and-hold: Enter Bluetooth pairing mode.
    7.0
    Portability
    L3.9" (9.8 cm)
    W7.0" (17.8 cm)
    H1.3" (3.4 cm)
    Volume36.19 in³ (593.00 cm³)
    Transmitter RequiredNo

    The JBL Tune 520BT are decently portable. They're on-ears, so they're a bit smaller than over-ear headphones. Their hinges bend, and the ear cups can rotate flat to make their footprint smaller. You can wear them around your neck easily because they're light and small, but they don't include a case.

    0.0
    Case
    TypeNo case
    LN/A
    WN/A
    HN/A
    VolumeN/A
    6.0
    Build Quality

    The JBL Tune 520BT have passable build quality. Their frame, housings, and hinges are plastic and don't feel particularly dense. The moving parts, such as hinges and yokes, are stiff and not very durable, but they all have a good range of motion. Meanwhile, the padding feels cheap and makes noise against your ears when you move. The headphones could probably survive a drop, but a bad angle on a joint could cause a crack.

    5.5
    Stability

    The JBL Tune 520BT have sub-par stability. Like the previous JBL Tune 510BT Wireless, they're on-ear headphones with a low clamping force, so they don't hold on to your head tightly. Tilting your head forward or backward can shift them off, and high-intensity movements will knock the cans off, too. You can walk around and sit at a desk just fine, but they're too unstable for exercising.

    Headshots 1
    Headshots 2
    Top
    In The Box

    • JBL Tune 520BT Wireless headphones
    • USB-C to USB-A 9.8-inch (25 cm) charging cable
    • Quick Start Guide and warranty paper
    Isolation
    3.8
    Noise Isolation - Full Range
    See details on graph tool
    Noise CancellingNo
    Overall Attenuation
    -9.03 dB
    Bass
    1.23 dB
    Mid
    -6.56 dB
    Treble
    -23.78 dB

    These have poor full-range noise isolation, which is common for on-ear headphones without active noise cancelling (ANC). Deep rumbles from jackhammers and bus engines will reach your ears unimpeded. Similarly, chatter and ambient din aren't blocked much at all either. However, high-pitched shrieking and clinking sounds like brake squeals and dish clatter in a cafe are muffled somewhat by the headphones' passive isolation.

    3.8
    Noise Isolation - Common Scenarios
    See details on graph tool
    Airplane Noise Attenuation
    -7.71 dB
    Airplane Noise Isolation Audio
    Office Noise Attenuation
    -8.26 dB
    Office Noise Isolation Audio
    Street Noise Attenuation
    -8.84 dB
    Street Noise Isolation Audio

    These don't block noise very differently between scenarios because there's no onboard ANC that adapts. As passive isolating headphones, their ability to handle noise in various environments depends on your ability to achieve an effective seal and the inherent isolating qualities of their materials. You can expect high-pitched sounds to be muffled slightly, but you'll still be able to hear your environment clearly.

    A note on the bump in the lowest frequencies in the graph: it's not noticeable when you actually listen and wear the headphones. After numerous checks (shown here for the Airplane Noise attenuation), compared with experiential use, we know it's limited to the testing rig and not representative of your day-to-day experience with the headphones. However, we're still looking into it.

    Noise Isolation - Voice Handling
    Female Voice 1
    Male Voice 1
    Female Voice 2
    Male Voice 2
    ANC Wind Handling
    ANC Wind Noise
    N/A
    7.5
    Leakage
    See details on graph tool
    Leakage Audio
    Overall Leakage @ 1ft
    36.8 dB

    Their sound leakage performance is good. What escapes is mostly a bright and mid-rangey representation of your audio, with not much audible bass. This depends on how loud you set your music, but in a moderately quiet space, vocals, leads, and bright percussive elements will be audible but not too bothersome.

    Microphone
    Microphone Style
    Integrated
    Yes
    In-Line
    No
    Boom
    No
    Detachable Boom
    No
    MicYes
    6.8
    Recording Quality
    See details on graph tool
    Recorded Speech
    LFE
    310.89 Hz
    FR Std. Dev.
    2.39 dB
    HFE
    4,974.24 Hz
    Weighted THD
    5.458
    Gain
    13.27 dB

    The integrated mic's recording quality sounds fair. While your voice is intelligible, the severe cut to the high frequencies causes you to sound congested. This effect will be more noticeable if your voice sits in a higher register. Similarly, the roll-off of bass frequencies causes speech to lack body; if your voice is deep, it'll sound thinner. Compared to the previous JBL Tune 510BT Wireless, the mic lacks clarity, which hinders the articulation of your words.

    6.3
    Noise Handling
    See details on graph tool
    SpNR
    13.44 dB
    Noise Gate
    No
    Speech + Pink Noise Handling
    6.5
    Speech + Pink Noise Audio Sample
    Speech + Subway Noise Handling
    6.0
    Speech + Subway Noise Audio Sample

    The noise-handling performance of their mic is mediocre. The mic doesn't really reject constant background noise except by cutting the high and low frequencies as it does with your voice. As a result, background sounds are rendered nearly as clear as your voice. Still, most of your speech remains intelligible, except with overwhelmingly loud background sounds, which can obscure your voice.

    Active Features
    8.6
    Battery
    Battery Type
    Rechargable
    Continuous Battery Life
    65.2 hrs
    Additional Charges
    0.0
    Total Battery Life
    65.2 hrs
    Charge Time
    1.9 hrs
    Power-Saving Feature
    Auto-Off Timer
    Audio While Charging
    No
    Passive Playback
    No
    Charging PortUSB-C

    The JBL 520BT have excellent battery performance. They're advertised to last 57 hours, and in testing, they reached about 65 hours of playback. Compared to the JBL Tune 510BT, that's roughly 25 more hours of juice. Your actual mileage can vary depending on use; for example, if you listen to music at a lower volume, you'll probably experience a longer battery life.

    The headphones charge via a USB-C cable, and according to the manufacturer, you can get three hours of playback with a five-minute charge. In their companion app, you can adjust the auto-off timer to conserve the battery.

    7.5
    App Support
    App NameJBL Headphones
    iOSYes
    AndroidYes
    macOSNo
    WindowsNo
    Equalizer
    Parametric + Presets
    ANC Control
    No
    Mic ControlMute/Unmute
    Room Effects
    No
    Playback Control
    No
    Button MappingNo
    Surround Support
    No

    The JBL 520BT's app is good. It's the same app that many other JBL headphones use, but stripped down because they don't support all of the same features; for example, they don't have ANC. You can take a look here to see how the app works. Inside, you can access a parametric EQ with presets or make your own. You can adjust the sidetone during calls, whether you want it at all or at a different volume. The app includes a volume limiter you can enable at 85 decibels (dB) for your hearing health. There's access to audio and video modes to compensate for latency (you can find more on that in Bluetooth Connection). The left and right channel balance feature is accessed through the app, which we successfully tested to better match the drivers' amplitude. You can set a timer to automatically turn the headphones off (either 30 minutes, one hour, or two hours). Lastly, you can change the language of the voice prompts.

    Connectivity
    0.0
    Wired Connection
    Analog Audio
    No
    USB Audio
    No
    Detachable
    No
    Length
    N/A
    Connector
    No Wired Option
    Latency - Analog
    N/A
    Latency - USB
    N/A
    Recorded Latency
    N/A
    Recorded Latency ConnectionNo Wired Audio

    The headphones include a USB-C to USB-A cable that only works for charging. The port's location makes it difficult to listen to music over Bluetooth while they're charging. They can't send audio over a wired connection.

    8.4
    Bluetooth Connection
    Bluetooth Version
    5.3
    Multi-Device Pairing
    2 Devices
    Quick Pair (Android)
    Yes
    Quick Pair (iOS)
    No
    Line Of Sight Range
    334.65 ft (102.00 m)
    Latency - SBC
    119 ms
    Latency - aptX
    N/A
    Latency - aptX Adaptive (High Quality)
    N/A
    Latency - aptX Adaptive (Low Latency)
    N/A
    Latency - LDAC
    N/A
    Recorded Latency
    Recorded Latency CodecSBC
    AAC Support
    No

    They have great Bluetooth connectivity. You can pair the headphones with two devices to switch between. They have Quick Pair for Android devices and support Swift Pair with Microsoft devices. In their companion app, you can select between an audio and video mode, and while video mode reduces delay, it's still pretty noticeable. As expected, the video mode's latency is lower than using audio mode. Compared to other headphones that also don't support adaptive codecs, their latency is better than plenty of others. Latency varies between devices, and some apps compensate for it, so your experience may differ. Despite using Bluetooth 5.3, these headphones only support the basic SBC codec and don't support higher-quality codecs like aptX for Android or AAC for iOS devices.

    0.0
    Wireless Connection (Dongle)
    Line Of Sight Range
    N/A
    Latency - Dongle
    N/A
    Recorded Latency
    N/A
    PC Compatibility
    Analog
    No
    Wired USB
    No
    Non-BT Wireless
    No

    The JBL Tune 520BT can only connect wirelessly to Bluetooth-compatible PCs for full audio and mic support.

    PlayStation Compatibility
    PS4 Analog
    No
    PS4 Wired USB
    No
    PS4 Non-BT Wireless
    No
    PS5 Analog
    No
    PS5 Wired USB
    No
    PS5 Non-BT Wireless
    No
    Xbox Compatibility
    Xbox One Analog
    No
    Xbox One Wired USB
    No
    Xbox One Non-BT Wireless
    No
    Xbox Series X|S Analog
    No
    Xbox Series X|S Wired USB
    No
    Xbox Series X|S Non-BT Wireless
    No
    0.0
    Base/Dock
    Type
    No Base/Dock
    USB Input
    No
    Line In
    No
    Line Out
    No
    Optical Input
    No
    RCA Input
    No
    Dock Charging
    No
    Power Supply
    No Base/Dock