There are a few advantages to getting a 1440p monitor for gaming, as they strike a balance between having good enough image quality and great gaming performance. A 1440p resolution isn't as taxing on your graphics card as higher resolutions, letting you reach higher frame rates, which is ideal for gaming. These monitors are available in a wide range of refresh rates, even up to 360Hz, so they're great for almost any type of gamer, and even current-gen gaming consoles, like the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S, support 1440p gaming.
When looking at a 1440p monitor's gaming performance, you should consider its response time for smooth motion handling, and which variable refresh rate (VRR) format it supports to ensure it's compatible with your graphics card. Low input lag results in a responsive feel, but most monitors have low input lag anyway. Most 1440p monitors are available with a 27- or 32-inch screen, but choosing the right size really is a personal preference.
We've bought and tested more than 300 monitors, and below are our recommendations for the best monitors to buy for 1440p gaming. Also, see our recommendations for the best gaming monitors, the best 1440p 144Hz monitors, and the best 1440p monitors.
The best 1440p gaming monitor we've tested is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM. It's a high-end 27-inch monitor with an OLED panel that combines fantastic gaming performance and exceptional picture quality. It has a 240Hz refresh rate that's ideal for competitive gaming, and it has FreeSync VRR support and G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing. Besides that, it has a near-instantaneous response time with any refresh rate for smooth motion.
It delivers fantastic picture quality, displaying perfect blacks without blooming, ideal for dark room gaming. While it has low input lag for a responsive feel, you must update it to the latest firmware for the best performance. However, if you want something with low input lag out of the box, the LG 27GR95QE-B offers that, but it doesn't get as bright and has more overshoot than the ASUS. Note that with either of these monitors, burn-in might occur if you constantly play the same game and fixed, static elements are on the screen. If this concerns you, consider one of the non-OLED monitors below.
If you're looking for a lower-cost OLED than the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM, check out the Acer Predator X27U bmiipruzx. The Acer has less vibrant HDR colors and higher latency for a less responsive feel. However, they both use the same panel, and it's very similar to the ASUS while costing less.
Like the ASUS, the Acer is an OLED, and burn-in might occur if you constantly play the same game and fixed, static elements are on the screen. If this concerns you, consider the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM. While it has a 240Hz refresh rate like the Acer, it's a step down in picture quality because it doesn't have an OLED panel and doesn't display the same perfect blacks in a dark room. However, it doesn't risk burn-in because it's not an OLED.
If you want a mid-range monitor for cheaper, there are some good options, like the LG 27GR83Q-B. It has a 27-inch screen and 240Hz refresh rate like the Acer Predator X27U bmiipruzx, but it's cheaper because it's not an OLED. As a result, it has much lower contrast, and deep blacks appear gray when gaming in a darker room. It also has a slower response time, so fast-moving objects look less sharp, though it still has fantastic motion handling at its maximum refresh rate.
Additionally, it has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, which is ideal if you have a modern HDMI 2.1 graphics card. It can even take full advantage of gaming consoles as it supports any signal with the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S, including downscaled 4k @ 120Hz, which results in a more detailed image than native 1440p.
If you want something less expensive but aren't necessarily looking for a budget monitor, the Dell Alienware AW2724DM is a good alternative in the lower mid-range price category. As you go for lower-cost displays, there are a few sacrifices you need to make, and in this case, it has a lower 180Hz max refresh rate compared to the 240Hz refresh rate on the LG 27GR83Q-B. It isn't as good of a choice if you're a competitive gamer who needs the highest refresh rate, but it's still good enough for casual gamers.
Luckily, its motion handling is incredible, as it has a fantastic response time at its maximum refresh rate. The monitor also works well with both the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S, but it doesn't have HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, so it can't downscale a 4k @ 120Hz signal for a more detailed image. However, this monitor doesn't have backlight strobing, and if you want a monitor that does, consider the LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B. However, the LG has less vivid HDR colors and doesn't support VRR with the PS5, unlike the Dell.
If you're looking for the best 1440p gaming monitor on a budget, check out the Dell G2724D. It's a very basic gaming monitor that performs very well. It has a 27-inch screen size like the Dell Alienware AW2724DM, but its max refresh rate is 165Hz. However, it still provides excellent motion handling with an extremely fast response time at any refresh rate.
This monitor supports all common VRR formats, including FreeSync, G-SYNC, and even HDMI Forum VRR, which is the format that the PS5 supports. It has a few gaming-oriented features, like crosshairs and different vision modes, giving you a competitive advantage over opponents. That said, it doesn't have many other extra features, as it lacks a USB hub and even an audio output, so if that's something you want, check out the Gigabyte M27Q P instead. However, that monitor has worse motion handling, so stick with the Dell if you want the best performance.
If you want a great 1440p gaming experience but have a very limited budget, consider the Gigabyte GS27QC. Its 170Hz maximum refresh rate is slightly faster than the Dell G2724D, so movement appears smooth, and it has a great response time at its maximum refresh rate for crisp motion. It also has excellent contrast, displaying deep blacks next to bright highlights, so it's a good choice for gaming in a darker room.
However, there are a few compromises to achieve great gaming performance on a very low budget. The Gigabyte's response time at 60Hz is considerably worse than the Dell's, and dark trails appear behind darker, fast-moving objects. It also has mediocre brightness and an unremarkable HDR experience. However, this monitor still delivers a great gaming experience if you're on a very limited budget.
Feb 13, 2024: Replaced the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM with the Acer Predator X27U bmiipruzx for 'Best Upper Mid-Range' as it has better performance. Replaced the LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B with the Dell Alienware AW2724DM for 'Best Lower Mid-Range' as it has more vivid HDR and supports VRR with the PS5. Created new 'Best Cheap 1440p Gaming Monitor' category with the Gigabyte GS27QC.
Nov 10, 2023: Replaced the Gigabyte M27Q P with the Dell G2724D because the Dell has better motion handling; replaced the Gigabyte G27Q with the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) in the Notable Mentions because it's better for gaming.
Oct 06, 2023: Moved the Dell Alienware AW3423DW to Notable Mentions and renamed the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM as the 'Best Monitor' to reflect how people are searching for 1440p gaming monitors; added the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDM as 'Best Upper Mid-Range Monitor'.
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best gaming monitors with a 1440p resolution currently available. They're adapted to be valid for most people. Rating is based on our review, factoring in price, and feedback from our visitors.
If you would prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all of our 1440p monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.