There are plenty of monitors you can get if you're on a tight budget. While you won't get the most premium features available on the market, there are a few budget-friendly models that offer better value in terms of price and performance compared to more expensive options. As the monitor market grows, you can find low-cost displays for various uses, from office work to gaming, or even with features like Mini LED backlighting or high resolutions, including up to 4k.
As there are so many different options available, it's important to consider your personal preferences and how you'll use the monitor; you'll want something with sharp text clarity and good ergonomics for work, or you'll want to get something with a high refresh rate and VRR support for gaming. Regardless of what you need it for, it's important to consider the monitor's performance for your specific use, as you'll want to get the most bang for your buck.
We've bought and tested over 335 monitors, and below, you'll find our top picks for the best low-cost monitors. Also, check out our recommendations for the best monitors under $200, the best monitors under $500, and the best budget and cheap gaming monitors. If you need more than just a monitor, then check out the best budget laptops and the best budget keyboards.
The best budget monitor we've tested is the AOC Q27G3XMN. It's a 27-inch, 1440p monitor mainly designed for gaming, but it's versatile for other uses, too. The main advantage of this over other budget-friendly monitors is that it uses Mini LED backlighting, which is a feature mainly found on higher-end models. Combined with its high native contrast ratio and good local dimming feature, it displays deep blacks against bright highlights, which is great for gaming in dark rooms. It also gets bright enough to fight glare and make highlights pop, so it's a great choice for watching content or gaming in HDR.
Although it's limited in extra features besides that, which is expected for a low-cost monitor, it's also useful for gaming. It has a max 180Hz refresh rate that you can reach over DisplayPort, and motion looks sharp thanks to its fast response time, but there's smearing with fast-moving objects. One thing to know is that this monitor sometimes goes out of stock, so if you can't find it available, check out the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx. It performs similarly and also has Mini LED backlighting, but it has worse motion handling.
There are benefits to getting a 4k monitor, like the sharper text that's useful for office work. There are some 4k displays you can get at a budget cost, like the Dell S2721QS, which is designed with work in mind. It's a good choice if you have a well-lit office space as it gets bright enough to fight glare, has wide viewing angles, and its excellent ergonomics make it easy to adjust. However, it's different from the AOC Q27G3XMN as it doesn't have Mini LED backlighting, and the picture quality is much worse in HDR. It's also limited to a 60Hz refresh rate and has worse motion handling, but that's what you have to expect from an office monitor.
A downside of using this monitor for work is that it doesn't have any USB ports, so you have to make sure your laptop or computer has enough ports to connect all your devices. If that's important for you, you can also look into the higher-end Dell S2722QC. It has a USB hub that includes a USB-C port with 65W of power delivery, but considering it performs similarly, you're paying more for the extra features, and the S2721QS is the better choice for most people.
If you don't need a 4k display like the Dell S2721QS and prefer a simple and cheap monitor, then look into the Dell G2724D, which you can find for a low cost directly from Dell's website. It has a 27-inch, 1440p screen like the AOC Q27G3XMN, but the main difference is that it doesn't have Mini LED backlighting, and its local dimming feature performs a lot worse. This means that blacks look gray in the dark, and it fails to make highlights pop the same way the AOC does, so it's worse for watching HDR content. However, that's the trade-off for getting something cheaper, and it still performs well for other uses.
Like the AOC, it's focused on gaming as it has a 165Hz refresh rate, and there's less smearing with fast-moving objects than on the AOC. Even if you want to use it for productivity when you aren't gaming, it's a good choice, as it gets bright enough to fight glare and has wide viewing angles that keep the image consistent when viewed from the sides. Like the S2721QS, it even has remarkable ergonomics that make it easy to adjust.
If you're looking for a cheap monitor but find a 27-inch screen like the Dell G2724D too big, there are some decent low-cost 24-inch displays to choose from. One of those is the AOC 24G15N, which is a cheap 1080p display that's meant for gaming and doesn't have many extra features, but it does its job as a simple monitor. It doesn't deliver the same details as the Dell because of its lower resolution, and one of the biggest differences is that it has worse motion handling with more smearing.
That said, it still has features you'd expect in a gaming monitor, like a 180Hz refresh rate and VRR support to reduce screen tearing. It even has a backlight strobing feature to try to reduce persistence blur, but it causes image duplication. However, if you don't need such gaming features and you prefer a 24-inch monitor for work, you can also check out the Dell P2425H. It has a few work-oriented features and even comes with a more ergonomic stand than the AOC, but it also costs a bit more and doesn't have any gaming features.
Although the monitors recommended above have 24- or 27-inch screen sizes, which represents most of the budget monitor market, there are a few decent low-cost 32-inch monitors available if you want a bigger screen. Budget monitors of this size aren't as good as smaller displays, but if you want a larger display, the LG 32GN650-B is a decent choice, and you can also find it as the 32GN63T-B at different retailers. Both models perform the same, so you can get whichever you can find for cheaper. Like the AOC 24G15N and the AOC Q27G3XMN, it's focused on gaming as it has a 165Hz refresh rate.
The main downside to this monitor is that fast-moving objects look blurry, and there's some smearing and inverse ghosting, though it's still decent enough if you don't play many fast-moving games. Since it has a VA panel, it displays fairly deep blacks next to bright highlights. However, the image looks washed out from the sides, so it's not a good choice if you regularly share your screen with someone else next to you.
The ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV is a low-cost monitor with a USB hub that is better for productivity than the AOC Q27G3XMN. However, it has worse picture quality because it doesn't have a local dimming feature, so it's only something to consider if you want a budget-friendly work monitor.
See our reviewThe ViewSonic XG2431 is a 24-inch gaming monitor with a higher refresh rate than the AOC 24G15N. It also has better motion handling, but considering it costs more, it may be too expensive if you're on a tight budget.
See our reviewThe ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS is an entry-level monitor that competes with the Dell G2724D. It has many of the same specs, and even has some advantages like better motion handling, but it costs more than the Dell.
See our reviewWe renamed the Dell S2721QS to the 'Best Budget 4k Monitor' to better represent the current market. We also replaced the Dell P2425H with the AOC 24G15N and renamed it to 'Best Cheap 24-Inch Monitor' for consistency with other recommendations. We also replaced the ASUS VG246H with the ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS in Notable Mentions, as the VG246H is hard to find.
Sep 24, 2024: We replaced the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx with the AOC Q27G3XMN as the best overall for consistency with other recommendations. We also replaced the ASUS VG246H with the Dell P2425H and renamed it the 'Best Cheap Work Monitor' for consistency. We moved the ViewSonic XG2431 to Notable Mentions as it doesn't fit into the scope of the recommendation. In the Notable Mentions, we also removed the Dell S3422DWG, ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A, and the Dell Alienware AW2724DM and added the VG246H and the AOC 24G15N to reflect changes.
Jul 03, 2024: Renamed the Dell G2724D as 'Best Cheap' and the ASUS VG246H as 'Best Cheap 24-Inch'. Added the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx as 'Best Budget,' as it gets brighter and has better HDR performance than the Dell. Added the Dell Alienware AW2724DM as a Notable Mention.
May 08, 2024: Verified our picks for accuracy and consistency and removed the Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx as a Notable Mention because it's difficult to find right now.
Mar 12, 2024: Replaced the AOC Q27G3XMN with the Dell G2724D for consistency with other recommendations; replaced the Gigabyte GS27QC with the ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A in the Notable Mentions because the ASUS is cheaper.
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best monitors you can get for a low cost. They are adapted to be valid for most people. Rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors.
If you would prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all of our budget monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.