Curved gaming monitors are a great choice if you sit close to the screen and find that the edges on flat monitors often look washed out. The main benefit of having a curved monitor is that the entire screen is closer to your field of vision, so you see a more consistent image across the display. The radius of a curved display tells you how aggressive the curvature is; a higher number like 2500R is subtle, while a lower number like 1000R is more aggressive. Not all curved gaming monitors are created equal, as they're available in different aspect ratios and sizes, but many of them are ultrawide displays.
When looking for a curved gaming monitor, it's important to consider its gaming performance and features, like its refresh rate, response time, and input lag, if you want the best gaming experience possible. There are downsides to getting a curved gaming monitor, though, as those with aggressive curves may take some time to get used to. While this isn't so much of a problem for gaming, this can be noticeable when browsing the web or going through menus if you aren't used to it.
We've bought and tested more than 300 monitors, and below are our picks for the best curved gaming monitors. For more options, see our recommendations for the best curved monitors, the best 34-49 inch monitors, and the best ultrawide gaming monitors.
The best curved gaming monitor we've tested is the Dell Alienware AW3423DW. It's a premium display that's excellent for gaming as it has a 175Hz refresh rate and a near-instantaneous response time, meaning there's no blur trail behind fast-moving objects. It also has native G-SYNC variable refresh rate (VRR) support, which is great if you have an NVIDIA graphics card. Even if you don't need something with native G-SYNC support and have an AMD graphics card, the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF is a similar monitor that costs a bit less.
Whichever model you get, both offer fantastic gaming performance and outstanding picture quality. They use a QD-OLED panel that delivers perfect black levels in dark rooms and offers a wide range of colors thanks to its quantum dot technology, which makes highlights pop and colors look vivid. Their 21:9 aspect ratio and 1800R curve also help deliver an immersive gaming experience as you can see more of your game simultaneously. You can also consider the cheaper MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED, which has the same QD-OLED panel but doesn't get as bright, meaning the AW3423DW still offers the best performance.
If you don't want an ultrawide monitor like the Dell Alienware AW3423DW, consider other premium monitors like the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85. It's different from the Dell because it has a 16:9 aspect ratio, so there's less horizontal space to see your games, and it has worse picture quality because it doesn't have an OLED panel for the same deep blacks and vivid colors. Instead, it uses Mini LED backlighting that's still good if you want to use it for dark room gaming. On the plus side, it has a higher 240Hz refresh rate than the Dell, but if you don't need a monitor with such a high refresh rate, you can also consider the similar and cheaper Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75, which has a 165Hz refresh rate.
The Neo G8 has a 4k resolution and HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, so it can take full advantage of modern graphics cards and gaming consoles and deliver a ton of detail. In terms of its gaming performance, it has an excellent response time at any refresh rate, resulting in minimal motion blur. It also has FreeSync VRR and G-SYNC compatibility, so it reduces screen tearing with any source.
If you find the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 too much out of your price range, consider getting a mid-range option like the Gigabyte M32UC. While it also has a 32-inch, 4k screen like the Samsung, there are a few differences in performance and features. It doesn't have Mini LED backlighting or any local dimming feature, so it performs worse in dark rooms and doesn't get as bright either, but that's the trade-off for getting something cheaper. Another downside is that it has worse motion handling, with more smearing with fast-moving objects. On the plus side, it has a backlight strobing feature that works across a wide refresh rate range and simultaneously with VRR, which isn't something all monitors can do and helps improve the appearance of motion.
Even though it's a step down in picture quality, it still offers great gaming performance. It has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, which makes it fully compatible with modern HDMI 2.1 graphics cards and consoles. Although its 160Hz refresh rate is lower than the 240Hz on the Samsung, it's still high enough for most PC gamers, especially if your graphics card can't maintain high frame rates with 4k signals.
If you still want to save money without being on a tight budget, a lower mid-range option like the Dell S3422DWG is a good alternative. It's different from the Gigabyte M32UC because it has an ultrawide format with a 34-inch screen and a lower 3440x1440 resolution than the 4k screen on the Gigabyte, so images are less detailed, and it doesn't offer HDMI 2.1 bandwidth either. That said, it still offers great gaming performance, and the 1800R curve helps bring the edges closer to your field of vision.
Regarding gaming features, it has a native 144Hz refresh rate with FreeSync VRR and G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing. While it has visible smearing with fast-moving objects, the overall response time is still good enough for gaming. It also has a backlight strobing feature to reduce persistence blur. Still, unlike the Gigabyte, it doesn't work simultaneously with VRR and is only available in a limited refresh rate range. One advantage of this monitor over the Gigabyte is that it gets brighter in HDR to make some highlights stand out.
If you're looking for something on a budget, it's better to look for 16:9 monitors instead of ultrawide monitors, as those tend to cost more, and the Gigabyte GS27QC is a great option as a 16:9 monitor. It has a 1440p resolution like the Dell S3422DWG, but you don't get the same immersive gaming experience as there's less horizontal screen space. Luckily, it has a slightly higher 170Hz max refresh rate and has the same FreeSync VRR support with G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing.
The main advantage of getting this over other budget gaming monitors is its impressive gaming performance with a great response time at its max refresh rate. While the response time is slower at 60Hz as there's more overshoot, it's still good enough for most gamers. There are some downsides to the monitor, though, as it doesn't get very bright, so if you want a budget-friendly option that does, then consider the Dell S2722DGM. The Dell costs more and has worse motion handling, so it doesn't offer the same great value as the Gigabyte.
Nov 14, 2023: Removed the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9/G95SC S49CG95 because it doesn't fit into the scope of the article; added the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 as 'Best Upper Mid-Range Monitor'; added the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9/G95NA S49AG95 and HP OMEN 34c to Notable Mentions.
Aug 24, 2023: Removed the LG 34GP950G-B and added the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9/G95SC S49CG95 as the 'Best Super Ultrawide Curved Gaming Monitor' to be consistent with other articles; added the Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 and the MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED to Notable Mentions.
Jun 29, 2023: Made sure that the monitors are still available to buy and clarified text throughout; removed the AOC CU34G2X and the AOC CQ27G2 from Notable Mentions because they went up in price, and added the Gigabyte G34WQC to Notable Mentions.
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best curved gaming monitors currently available. They are adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. Rating is based on our review, factoring in price, and feedback from our visitors.
If you would prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all of our curved monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.