The 4 Best OLED Monitors of 2026  

Updated Feb 27, 2026 at 02:53 pm
Best OLED Monitors
 16

The most popular panel type on monitors is OLED. They have individual pixels that can turn on and off, which helps them display perfect blacks in dark rooms without any haloing around bright objects. Besides their superior picture quality versus LCD displays, they're beneficial for gaming as they have a near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion. There are many different OLED models out there, including both WOLED and QD-OLED, with various sizes, resolutions, and refresh rates. Since many models use the same panel as their competitors, choosing one over another can come down to features, price, and availability. They're also available at different price points, although entry-level OLEDs aren't cheap.

However, there are downsides to using an OLED, as they're prone to burn-in when exposed to the same static elements over time, like if you only use it for work all day, every day. They also don't get as bright as many LED-backlit LCD monitors, so they're best used in a dark environment, and OLEDs have VRR flicker with changing frame rates. Although QD-OLEDs generally offer the best picture quality with more vivid colors than WOLEDs, their black levels rise in bright rooms. A downside of WOLEDs is that they tend to have a gamma shift at low refresh rates, causing a loss of details in dark scenes.

We've bought and tested more than 380 monitors, and below are our picks for the best OLED monitors available. See our recommendations for the best HDR gaming monitors, the best HDR monitors, and, if you're concerned about the risk of burn-in, the best Mini LED monitors. Check out the best OLED TVs, too, and learn about the best monitor brands.

How We Test Monitors
How We Test Monitors

We buy and test more than 30 monitors each year, all of which we purchase ourselves, without cherry-picked units or samples. We put a lot into each unbiased, straight-to-the-point review, and there's a whole process from purchasing to publishing, involving multiple teams and people. We do more than just use the monitor for a week; we use specialized, custom tools to measure various aspects and deliver objective, data-driven results. We also consider multiple factors before making any recommendations, including the monitor's cost, its performance compared to the competition, and whether it's easy to find.

  1. Best OLED Monitor

    The best OLED gaming monitor we've tested is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM. It's a QD-OLED that combines a 4k resolution with a 240Hz refresh rate. This makes it ideal for gamers who want a responsive feel and a detailed image. It has everything you'd expect from a premium OLED gaming monitor, like a near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion. It also takes full advantage of gaming consoles and modern graphics cards because it supports both HDMI and DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth. It even has remarkable HDR picture quality with vivid colors and bright highlights, which is what you should expect with a QD-OLED. One of its advantages is its high pixel density, which results in sharp images and text.

    This monitor is part of a group of 27-inch, 4k QD-OLEDs that all perform similarly. This particular model is worth getting over other options because it has some extra features, like a USB hub and a KVM switch. It also supports Dolby Vision, which is a nice touch for a gaming monitor. However, you can also check out the Dell Alienware AW2725Q if you want something cheaper, but it doesn't get as bright as the ASUS and lacks DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth.

  2. Best Upper Mid-Range OLED Monitor

    If you don't need a premium OLED at a high price, there are plenty of 1440p OLEDs you can get for less, like the LG 27GX790B-B. The lower resolution results in less-sharp, less-detailed images than on the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM. This also means it requires less bandwidth from your graphics card to reach high frame rates. Plus, the LG has a higher 540Hz native refresh rate for a smoother feel, and it has a dual-mode feature to boost it to 720Hz with a lower 720p resolution. This gives it versatility for playing different types of games.

    Besides the lower resolution, it has a few other differences in picture quality. It uses an RGB Tandem OLED panel whose colors aren't as vivid as on the ASUS, and its matte coating has a hazier image than the ASUS. However, it has a few advantages: it maintains lower black levels better in bright rooms, and it gets much brighter than the ASUS. This means highlights pop, and it fights glare well. If you don't need such a high refresh rate, the LG 27GX790A-B is a good alternative that you can find for less, but it isn't as bright.

  3. Best Mid-Range OLED Monitor

    If you're looking for the best OLED gaming monitor in the mid-range price category, look into the Dell Alienware AW3425DW. Although it doesn't cost significantly less than the LG 27GX790B-B, it differs from the LG in that it has a lower 240Hz refresh rate, and it doesn't have a dual-mode feature, either. This means gaming feels less smooth, but motion still looks sharp thanks to its near-instantaneous response time. It also has an ultrawide screen, so it offers a more immersive gaming experience with a bigger display than the LG.

    Another difference versus the LG is that this Dell is a QD-OLED, so colors are more vivid. You still get all the benefits of an OLED with perfect blacks against bright highlights, but the black levels rise in bright rooms. This means you need to use it in a dark space to get the best picture quality. If you want a WOLED that performs better in well-lit rooms, the LG 34GS95QE-B is another ultrawide option that also offers a 240Hz refresh rate, but it tends to cost more than the Dell.

  4. Best Budget OLED Monitor

    While OLEDs still cost a lot compared to the rest of the monitor market, there are some entry-level options you can consider if you want to save some money. The Dell S3225QC is an entry point into the OLED market, offering many of the benefits of an OLED, with fewer features. Although it costs less than the Dell Alienware AW3425DW, it's more of a step-down model compared to the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM. This is because it has a QD-OLED panel with similar picture quality, including vivid colors and a 4k resolution. However, it doesn't get as bright in SDR and is less accurate.

    This Dell monitor also has a lower 120Hz refresh rate than the ASUS. This means gaming feels less smooth, and it's not a good choice for playing action games that require high frame rates. That said, this is the downside of getting something cheaper. At least it supports 4k signals up to 120Hz with gaming consoles, and it even supports Dolby Vision with an Xbox. Essentially, this monitor offers solid value as an entry-level OLED, especially if you aren't going to take advantage of the higher refresh rates on the more expensive options.

Notable Mentions

  • ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM: 

    The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM is a larger, 32-inch alternative to the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM. It performs similarly for the most part, but it lacks DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth.

     See our review
  • ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG: 

    The ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG is a premium 4k, 240Hz display with a 1080p, 480Hz dual mode. Consider this over the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM if you want more versatility. Plus, the XG32UCWMG has a glossy WOLED panel that retains low black levels in bright rooms. However, its colors aren't as vivid as on the PG27UCDM.

     See our review
  • Gigabyte MO27Q28G: 

    The Gigabyte MO27Q28G is a 1440p, 280Hz RGB Tandem OLED that's a cheaper alternative to the LG 27GX790B-B. The lower refresh rate on the Gigabyte means gaming doesn't feel as smooth, but it's worth considering if you're not going to take full advantage of the LG.

     See our review
  • ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG: 

    The ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG is an upper mid-range OLED that's in the same price range as the LG 27GX790B-B. The ASUS uses a QD-OLED panel, so colors are more vivid. That said, it has a lower refresh rate and doesn't get as bright as the LG.

     See our review
  • ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG: 

    The ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG is another entry-level OLED that's in the same price range as the Dell S3225QC. However, it's different from the Dell because it has a 1440p resolution and a 240Hz refresh rate. The ASUS is something to consider if you need the higher refresh rate for gaming, but images aren't as sharp as on the Dell.

     See our review

Recent Updates

  1.  Feb 27, 2026: 

    We replaced the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG with the LG 27GX790B-B, which has a higher refresh rate. We also replaced the LG 27GX700A-B with the cheaper Dell Alienware AW3425DW. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 with the Gigabyte MO27Q28G and we added the XG27ACDNG.

  2.  Feb 03, 2026: 

    We restructured the article to better focus on each OLED monitor's market position. We removed the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG and renamed the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG to 'Best Upper Mid-Range OLED Monitor.' We also replaced the LG 27GX790A-B with the LG 27GX700A-B and renamed it to the 'Best Mid-Range OLED Monitor.' We removed the Dell Alienware AW3425DW and added the Dell S3225QC as the 'Best Budget OLED Monitor.' In the Notable Mentions, we removed the MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED, the Sony INZONE M10S, and the LG 45GX950A-B, and added the XG32UCWMG and the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG.

  3.  Nov 26, 2025: 

    We replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM with the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG, which has a dual-mode feature that boosts its refresh rate. We also reordered the categories for a better flow. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9/G95SC S49CG95 with the PG32UCDM and the LG 45GX950A-B.

  4.  Sep 12, 2025: 

    We replaced the Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P with the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM, which is easier to find. We also replaced the LG 34GS95QE-B with the Dell Alienware AW3425DW because it has better picture quality, and renamed the category to the 'Best 34-Inch OLED Monitor.' We renamed the LG 27GX790A-B to the 'Best High Refresh Rate OLED Monitor.' In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the PG32UCDM with the MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED.

  5.  Jul 10, 2025: 

    We made several changes according to price and availability, and for consistency with other recommendations. We replaced the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED with the Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P and renamed it to the 'Best 32-Inch Monitor.' We also renamed the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM to the 'Best Monitor.' We replaced the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED, Sony INZONE M10S, and the MSI MPG 341CQPX QD-OLED with the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG, LG 27GX790A-B, and the LG 34GS95QE-B, respectively. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the 27GX790A-B, MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED, and the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG with the M10S, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM, and the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9/G95SC S49CG95.

All Reviews

Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best OLED monitors currently available, including the best OLED gaming monitor. They're adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. The rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors.

If you'd prefer to make your own decision, here's the list of all of our OLED monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.