Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx  Monitor Review

Reviewed Jun 26, 2024 at 10:00am
Tested using Methodology v2.1.1 
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx
7.8
PC Gaming 
7.0
Console Gaming 
7.9
Office 
7.7
Editing 
8.9
Brightness 
6.9
Response Time 
7.8
HDR Picture 
8.4
SDR Picture 
 14

The Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx is a lower mid-range 27-inch, 1440p gaming monitor with a 170Hz refresh rate. It sits below the Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx, which has a higher resolution, and above the budget-friendly Acer Nitro XV275U V, which doesn't have Mini LED backlighting like this one. It has 384 dimming zones, and it competes with other low-cost displays that also use Mini LED backlighting, like the AOC Q27G3XMN. It doesn't have a ton of features besides the typical gaming ones, like VRR support and RGB lighting, as it lacks any USB ports or HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.

How We Test Monitors

We buy and test more than 30 monitors each year, with units that we buy completely on our own, without any cherry-picked units or samples. We put a lot into each unbiased, straight-to-the-point review, and there's a whole process from purchasing to publishing, involving multiple teams and people. We do more than just use the monitor for a week; we use specialized and custom tools to measure various aspects with objective data-based results. We also consider multiple factors before making any recommendations, including the monitor's cost, its performance against the competition, and whether or not it's easy to find.

Our Verdict

7.8
PC Gaming 

The Acer XV275U P3 is good for PC gaming. It has low input lag for a responsive feel and VRR support to reduce screen tearing, but motion looks blurry, and it has noticeable inverse ghosting. On top of that, it has visible VRR flicker with changing frame rates, particularly in dark scenes. On the plus side, it has good picture quality thanks to its high native contrast ratio and Mini LED local dimming. It also gets bright enough for highlights to pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Makes highlights pop in HDR.
  • Mini LED local dimming improves black levels.
  • Low input lag.
  • 170Hz refresh rate and VRR support.
Cons
  • Blurry motion with fast-moving objects.
  • Some blooming with local dimming on.
  • Distracting VRR flicker.
7.0
Console Gaming 

The Acer Nitro XV275U is decent for console gaming. It has low input lag for a responsive feel, and it delivers good picture quality with a high native contrast ratio and Mini LED local dimming feature, so it displays deep blacks and bright highlights. However, motion is blurry, and it can't take full advantage of the Xbox Series X|S and PS5 as it's limited to HDMI 2.0 bandwidth.

Pros
  • Makes highlights pop in HDR.
  • Mini LED local dimming improves black levels.
  • Low input lag.
Cons
  • Blurry motion with fast-moving objects.
  • Some blooming with local dimming on.
  • Lack of HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.
7.9
Office 

The Acer XV275U P3 is very good for office use. It easily gets bright enough to fight glare, which is ideal if you want to use it in a well-lit room, but it has only fair reflection handling. It also has outstanding ergonomics that make it easy to place in an ideal position, but with narrow viewing angles, it's hard to share your screen with someone else, as the image looks washed out from the sides. Lastly, it has good text clarity, and its 27-inch screen is big enough to place two windows side-by-side.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Outstanding ergonomics.
  • Good text clarity.
Cons
  • Narrow viewing angles.
  • No dedicated productivity features.
  • Reflects a lot of light in bright rooms.

7.7
Editing 

The Acer XV275U P3 is good for editing. It has good picture quality thanks to its high native contrast ratio, which displays deep blacks in dark rooms. It has a Mini LED local dimming feature to further improve that, which is great for editing HDR content. It also gets bright enough to fight glare if you want to use it in a bright office space, but it has only fair reflection handling. While it has a dedicated sRGB mode, you still need to calibrate it for the best accuracy.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Mini LED local dimming improves black levels.
  • Displays wide range of colors.
  • Outstanding ergonomics.
  • Good text clarity.
Cons
  • Some blooming with local dimming on.
  • Needs full calibration for best accuracy.
  • Narrow viewing angles.
  • No dedicated productivity features.
8.9
Brightness 

The Acer XV275U has amazing brightness. It easily gets bright enough to fight glare in a well-lit room and makes highlights pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Makes highlights pop in HDR.
Cons
None
6.9
Response Time 

The Acer XV275U P3 has an okay response time, but there's noticeable smearing and inverse ghosting with fast-moving objects at any refresh rate.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Blurry motion with fast-moving objects.
  • Noticeable inverse ghosting.
7.8
HDR Picture 

The Acer XV275U P3 has good HDR picture quality. It has a high native contrast ratio, and its Mini LED local dimming feature further improves it. However, there's blooming around bright objects with local dimming on. On the plus side, it displays a wide range of colors and makes them look vivid.

Pros
  • Excellent native contrast.
  • Mini LED local dimming improves black levels.
Cons
  • Some blooming with local dimming on.
8.4
SDR Picture 

The Acer Nitro XV275U has impressive SDR picture quality. It displays a wide range of colors and has a high native contrast ratio, so it displays deep blacks in dark rooms.

Pros
  • Excellent native contrast.
  • Displays wide range of colors.
Cons
None
7.8
Color Accuracy 

The Acer XV275U P3 has good color accuracy. It has decent accuracy in its dedicated sRGB picture mode, but you need to calibrate it for the most accurate colors.

Pros
  • Dedicated sRGB mode.
Cons
  • Needs full calibration for best accuracy.
  • 7.8
    PC Gaming
  • 7.0
    Console Gaming
  • 7.9
    Office
  • 7.7
    Editing

  • Performance Usages

  • 8.9
    Brightness
  • 6.9
    Response Time
  • 7.8
    HDR Picture
  • 8.4
    SDR Picture
  • 7.8
    Color Accuracy
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Nov 10, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.1.1. We removed the Vertical Viewing Angle test.
    2.  Updated Jun 13, 2025: 

      Added that the AOC Q27G40XMN is another monitor with better accuracy before calibration.

    3.  Updated Jun 13, 2025: 

      We updated text throughout to match the new and updated tests with Test Bench 2.1, including in the Verdict section.

    4.  Updated Jun 13, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.1. This includes new tests for Direct Reflections, Ambient Black Level Raise, and Total Reflected Light. You can see all the changes in the changelog.

    Check Price

    27"Nitro XV275U P3biipx
    Amazon.com
    27"Nitro XV275U P3biipx
    B&H
    27"Nitro XV275U P3biipx
    BestBuy.com
    27"Nitro XV275U P3biipx
    Walmart.com

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the 27-inch Acer Nitro XV275U P3, which is part of the XV5 lineup of Acer Nitro gaming monitors. It sits below the Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx, and there are other models that share a similar name but perform differently. You can see the differences between them below, but the results in this review are only valid for the XV275U P3.

    Model Size Resolution Panel Type Backlight Type Refresh Rate USB-A USB-C
    XV275U P3 27" 1440p VA Mini LED 170Hz 0 0
    XV275U V 27" 1440p IPS LED 170Hz 2 1
    XV275K P3 27" 4k IPS Mini LED 160Hz 2 1

    Our unit was manufactured in March 2023; you can see the label here.

    Popular Monitor Comparisons

    The Acer Nitro XV275U P3 is a good lower mid-range gaming monitor that has better picture quality than most other low-cost monitors thanks to its Mini LED backlighting. This allows it to display deep blacks next to bright highlights that pop, which is great for watching HDR content, and it provides good value as a multimedia monitor. However, it has blurry motion handling, which is disappointing for gaming, and it's better to go for the similar AOC Q27G3XMN if you're a gamer.

    Check out our recommendations for the best HDR gaming monitors, the best 1440p gaming monitors, and the best budget and cheap gaming monitors.

    AOC Q27G3XMN

    The AOC Q27G3XMN and the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx are competing entry-level monitors with many of the same features. While they each have Mini LED local dimming, the AOC is just a bit better as it has less blooming. However, the Acer is the better choice if you need something for a well-lit room as it gets brighter. On the other hand, the AOC has an advantage for gaming thanks to its faster response time.

    AOC Q27G40XMN

    The Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx and the AOC Q27G40XMN are both entry-level 1440p gaming monitors. They each feature Mini LED backlighting, but the AOC is the better choice for most people. This is because it has a better local dimming feature, so it has better picture quality in dark scenes, as there's less black crush. The AOC also has better color accuracy, and motion looks sharper with fast-moving objects. While both monitors get bright, the main advantage of the Acer is that it has better PQ EOTF tracking, so it displays most content at the intended brightness. The Acer also has much better ergonomics, making it easier to adjust.

    Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx

    The Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx is a higher-end monitor than the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx, so it has more features. The XV275K's higher resolution results in a more detailed and sharper image, and it has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of gaming consoles and modern graphics cards. The XV275K also has extra productivity perks that the XV275U doesn't have, like a USB hub that includes a USB-C port for you to easily connect a laptop. However, the XV275U is the better choice if you want to watch content in dark rooms and you aren't going to use the local dimming feature, as it has a higher native contrast ratio.

    Xiaomi G Pro 27i

    The Xiaomi G Pro 27i and the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx are entry-level 27-inch, 1440p gaming monitors that each have Mini LED backlighting. The Xiaomi has more dimming zones, and its local dimming feature performs better, as there's less black crush and blooming than on the Acer. The Xiaomi also has advantages in other ways because it comes with more accurate colors, and the main difference is that it has better motion handling for a superior gaming experience. That said, the Acer is the better choice for console gaming, as it downscales 4k signals, which the Xiaomi can't do.

    Show more 

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    Style
    Curved
    No
    Curve Radius
    Not Curved

    The Acer Nitro XV275U P3 has a simple design with an all-black plastic body and a tripod stand. While its RGB lighting on the back gives it a bit of a gaming look, it won't look out of place even in an office environment.

    8.0
    Build Quality

    The build quality is great. The monitor and the pillar of the stand are both plastic, while the base of the stand is metal. Although the monitor doesn't feel premium, there aren't any obvious construction issues, and the plastic doesn't easily flex either.

    9.7
    Ergonomics
    Min Height To Top Of Panel
    17.0" (43.1 cm)
    Height Adjustment
    5.7" (14.6 cm)
    Tilt Range
    -25° to 5°
    Rotate Portrait/Landscape
    Yes, Both Ways
    Swivel Range
    -25° to 25°
    Wall Mount
    VESA 75x75

    The ergonomics are outstanding as you can easily adjust it in many different ways to find a comfortable position. The adjustments feel smooth, and the monitor stays in place properly once you're done adjusting it. One downside is that the VESA mounting slot is too small to accommodate even a 100x100 VESA plate with 75x75 hole options, so it can be difficult to find a proper mounting adapter. Lastly, the stand has a clip for cable management.

    Stand
    Base Width
    21.7" (55.2 cm)
    Base Depth
    10.6" (27.0 cm)
    Thickness (With Display)
    8.7" (22.2 cm)
    Weight (With Display)
    13.8 lbs (6.3 kg)
    Display
    Size
    27"
    Housing Width
    24.2" (61.4 cm)
    Housing Height
    14.2" (36.0 cm)
    Thickness (Without Stand)
    3.1" (8.0 cm)
    Weight (Without Stand)
    9.6 lbs (4.4 kg)
    Borders Size (Bezels)
    0.4" (0.9 cm)
    Controls

    There are four controls and a power button to native the on-screen display. However, like the Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx, the buttons feel stiff, are hard to press, and even cause the monitor to wobble when you press them. On top of that, they can even leave imprints on your fingers, so changing settings in the OSD really isn't user-friendly.

    In The Box
    Power Supply
    External Brick

    • DisplayPort cable
    • HDMI cable
    • Power cable and supply
    • User guides, including calibration report
    Picture Quality
    8.6
    Contrast
    Native Contrast
    4,559 : 1
    Contrast With Local Dimming
    4,720 : 1

    This monitor has an excellent contrast ratio. It displays deep blacks next to bright highlights, ideal for using it in a dark room. Although the local dimming feature doesn't significantly improve the contrast ratio, it still helps the monitor display deep blacks.

    6.0
    Local Dimming
    Local Dimming
    Yes
    Backlight
    Full-Array

    The local dimming feature isn't bad. It uses Mini LED backlighting with 384 dimming zones. Setting Adaptive Dimming to 'Fast' helps improve the contrast ratio so that it displays deep blacks, but it also results in black crush and a loss of details with small, bright objects like in star fields. There's also a bit of blooming around bright objects and subtitles, but it isn't the worst case of it either. Lastly, the algorithm reacts quickly to rapid objects moving across the screen, but you can still notice when an object moves between dimming zones. Overall, the local dimming feature looks better in HDR than in SDR, so it could be better to keep it off in SDR altogether as there's a loss of details and some blooming.

    Should you want another low-cost Mini LED monitor with better local dimming, consider the Xiaomi G Pro 27i.

    8.6
    SDR Brightness
    Real Scene
    580 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    588 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    588 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    586 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    583 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    581 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    586 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    586 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    584 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    582 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    580 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.001
    Minimum Brightness
    37 cd/m²

    The SDR brightness is excellent. It easily gets bright enough to fight glare, and it maintains its brightness very consistently across different content. Besides the Minimum Brightness, these results are from after calibration in the 'User' Picture Mode with Max Brightness on, the Brightness at its max, and Adaptive Dimming off. Setting Adaptive Dimming actually results in a dimmer screen, as you can see here:

    • Real Scene 558 cd/m²
    • Peak 2% Window 471 cd/m²
    • Peak 10% Window 525 cd/m²
    • Peak 25% Window 552 cd/m²
    • Peak 50% Window 570 cd/m²
    • Peak 100% Window 575 cd/m²
    • Sustained 2% Window 471 cd/m²
    • Sustained 10% Window 524 cd/m²
    • Sustained 25% Window 551 cd/m²
    • Sustained 50% Window 568 cd/m²
    • Sustained 100% Window 574 cd/m²
    • Minimum Brightness 46 cd/m²

    As for the Minimum Brightness, the result in the review is with Max Brightness off and Adaptive Dimming on 'Low'. This results in the lowest brightness out of any combination of these two settings. Disabling local dimming with Max Brightness on results in a minimum brightness of 53 cd/m². If you're sensitive to bright screens in a dark room, it's best to disable Max Brightness regardless of which Adaptive Dimming setting you choose.

    9.1
    HDR Brightness
    VESA DisplayHDR Certification
    DisplayHDR 1000
    Real Scene
    1,074 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    797 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    1,319 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    1,548 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    1,631 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    1,320 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    792 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    1,316 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    1,543 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    1,613 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    1,109 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.036

    The HDR brightness is incredible. Even if small highlights aren't brighter than larger highlights, they still look bright enough for a vivid HDR image. The PQ EOTF tracking is also decent, but there's a slow roll-off at the peak brightness, so it doesn't let highlights get the brightness they could. These results are in the HDR Mode with Max Brightness on, the Brightness at its max, and Adaptive Dimming on 'Fast.' Although the Real Scene brightness is brighter with Adaptive Dimming off, reaching a brightness of 1,298 cd/m², it doesn't display the same deep blacks as on 'Fast.' The PQ EOTF tracking is similar with Adaptive Dimming on off, 'Low,' or 'Fast.'

    7.8
    Gray Uniformity
    50% Std. Dev.
    2.109%
    50% DSE
    0.168%

    The gray uniformity is good. While there's a bit of dirty screen effect in the center, and the edges are darker, it isn't overly distracting either.

    7.7
    Black Uniformity
    Native Std. Dev.
    1.115%
    Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
    0.326%

    The black uniformity is good. Enabling local dimming improves the contrast, but while you don't see it with the test image, it causes some blooming around bright objects.

    7.3
    Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
    Picture Mode
    Standard (sRGB)
    sRGB Gamut Area xy
    95.7%
    White Balance dE (Avg.)
    6.02
    Color Temperature (Avg.)
    6,452 K
    Gamma (Avg.)
    2.22
    Color dE (Avg.)
    3.75
    Contrast Setting
    N/A
    RGB Settings
    Default
    Gamma Setting
    Default
    Brightness Setting
    80
    Measured Brightness
    156 cd/m²
    Brightness Locked
    No

    The accuracy before calibration is decent. Setting Color Space to 'sRGB' locks colors to the sRGB color space well, but there are still issues with the white balance and gamma tracking, as most content is either too dark or too bright. On the plus side, the color temperature is very close to the 6500K target. Using the sRGB color space locks some color settings, but colors are oversaturated without it, as you can see here.

    If you care about accuracy before calibration and want a monitor with more accurate colors, look into the AOC Q27G40XMN.

    9.2
    Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
    Picture Mode
    User
    sRGB Gamut Area xy
    95.0%
    White Balance dE (Avg.)
    0.69
    Color Temperature (Avg.)
    6,480 K
    Gamma (Avg.)
    2.19
    Color dE (Avg.)
    0.82
    Contrast Setting
    50
    RGB Settings
    Gain (44, 50, 47), Bias (47, 47, 46)
    Gamma Setting
    2.2
    Brightness Setting
    30
    Measured Brightness
    102 cd/m²
    ICC Profile
    Download

    The accuracy after calibration is fantastic, and you won't notice any issues.

    9.2
    SDR Color Gamut
    sRGB Coverage xy
    95.3%
    sRGB Picture Mode
    User
    Adobe RGB Coverage xy
    96.4%
    Adobe RGB Picture Mode
    User

    The SDR color gamut is fantastic. It displays nearly all colors in both the sRGB and Adobe RGB color spaces, but it oversaturates reds in Adobe RGB, which is disappointing if you're a photo editor who works with this color space.

    8.5
    HDR Color Gamut
    Wide Color Gamut
    Yes
    DCI-P3 Coverage xy
    92.2%
    DCI-P3 Picture Mode
    HDR On
    Rec. 2020 Coverage xy
    77.1%
    Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
    HDR On

    The HDR color gamut is excellent. It displays a wide range of colors in the common DCI-P3 color space and the wider Rec. 2020 color space, but some colors are off in each space. These results are with Adaptive Dimming on 'Fast,' and they're similar with it off as well.

    8.6
    HDR Color Volume
    1,000 cd/m² DCI-P3 Coverage ICtCp
    83.2%
    DCI-P3 Picture Mode
    HDR On
    10,000 cd/m² Rec. 2020 Coverage ICtCp
    42.2%
    Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
    HDR On

    The HDR color volume is excellent. It displays most bright and dark colors well, so they look vivid. These results are with Adaptive Dimming on 'Fast,' but it can't display the same dark colors with it off. You can see the results with Adaptive Dimming off in DCI-P3 and Rec. 2020.

    6.0
    Viewing Angle
    Color Washout From Left
    29°
    Color Washout From Right
    29°
    Color Shift From Left
    57°
    Color Shift From Right
    65°
    Brightness Loss From Left
    32°
    Brightness Loss From Right
    32°
    Black Level Raise From Left
    16°
    Black Level Raise From Right
    17°
    Gamma Shift From Left
    15°
    Gamma Shift From Right
    18°

    The Acer Nitro XV275U has a mediocre horizontal viewing angle. The image quickly washes out from the sides, which is disappointing if you want to share your screen with someone next to you.

    7.5
    Text Clarity
    Pixel Type
    VA
    Subpixel Layout
    RGB

    The Acer Nitro XV275U P3 has good text clarity. Enabling Windows ClearType (top photo) improves the boldness of letters. These photos are in Windows 10, and you can also see them in Windows 11 with ClearType on and with ClearType off.

    6.5
    Direct Reflections
    See details on graph tool
    Peak Direct Reflection Intensity
    31.7%
    Screen Finish
    Matte

    The direct reflection handling is fair. While the matte coating spreads light out, bright objects are still somewhat distinct.

    8.9
    Ambient Black Level Raise
    See details on graph tool
    Black Luminance @ 0 lx
    0.01 cd/m²
    Black Luminance @ 1000 lx
    0.47 cd/m²

    The black levels are fantastic in brighter environments. In bright rooms, the black levels remain low.

    5.5
    Total Reflected Light
    Total Reflected Light Intensity
    37,559% ⋅ pixel
    Diffraction Artifacts
    No

    The monitor reflects a lot of light back. It also spreads light out, so it doesn't absorb much light, and it's hard to properly see the screen in a well-lit room.

    9.6
    Gradient
    Color Depth
    10 Bit

    The gradient handling is incredible, and you won't notice banding with shades of similar colors.

    Motion
    7.6
    Refresh Rate
    Native Refresh Rate
    170 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate
    170 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over DP
    170 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
    144 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over DP @ 10-bit
    170 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI @ 10-Bit
    60 Hz
    DSC Toggle
    No
    DSC Off Max Refresh Rate Over DP
    N/A
    DSC Off Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
    N/A

    Although the DisplayPort 1.2 port doesn't have enough bandwidth for uncompressed 10-bit signals at the max refresh rate, it's using Display Stream Compression (DSC) in order to reach 170Hz. Most modern graphics cards support DSC to reach this max refresh rate.

    Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
    Variable Refresh Rate
    Yes
    FreeSync
    Yes
    G-SYNC
    Compatible (Tested)
    VRR Maximum
    170 Hz
    VRR Minimum
    < 20 Hz
    VRR Supported Connectors
    DisplayPort, HDMI

    NVIDIA VRR Min VRR Max
    DisplayPort <20Hz 170Hz
    HDMI N/A N/A

    AMD VRR Min VRR Max
    DisplayPort <20Hz 170Hz
    HDMI <20Hz 144Hz
    6.8
    VRR Motion Performance
    See details on graph tool
    Recommended VRR OD Setting
    Freesync Premium (Normal)
    Variable Overdrive Advertised
    No
    Avg. CAD
    221
    Best CAD
    168
    Worst CAD
    354

    Refresh Rate CAD Heatmap RT Chart Pursuit Photo
    169 Heatmap Chart Photo
    165 Heatmap Chart Photo
    144 Heatmap Chart Photo
    120 Heatmap Chart Photo
    100 Heatmap Chart Photo
    80 Heatmap Chart Photo
    60 Heatmap Chart Photo

    The Acer Nitro XV275U P3 has okay motion handling across its VRR range. While it's good at high refresh rates, there's more inverse ghosting as the refresh rate drops, which is distracting. Although you can't change the Over Drive setting with VRR enabled, it just uses the previously selected overdrive. The 'Extreme' overdrive has such high CAD that it passes the limits of the chart, and you can see an alternative chart here.

    7.5
    Refresh Rate Compliance
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Compliance @ Max Hz
    53%
    Compliance @ 120 FPS
    63%
    Compliance @ 60 FPS
    73%

    The refresh rate compliance is good. While its response time isn't fast enough to make full color transitions before the monitor draws the next frame at the max refresh rate, it's better as the refresh rate drops. The data has a lot of noise due to the monitor's backlight flicker, but you can see the compliance with charts that smooth out the flicker below.

    7.5
    CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
    OD Transition Max Refresh Rate
    od-transition-max-refresh-rate-extreme-0-31
    OD extreme
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    Avg. CAD
    168
    Best 10% CAD
    38
    Worst 10% CAD
    324

    Overdrive Mode CAD Heatmap RT Chart Pursuit Photo
    Off Heatmap Chart Photo
    Normal Heatmap Chart Photo
    Extreme Heatmap Chart Photo

    The CAD at the max refresh rate of 170Hz is good. There isn't much blur behind fast-moving objects, but there's noticeable smearing and inverse ghosting with the 'Normal' Over Drive setting, and there's still inverse ghosting even with the overdrive setting off.

    Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    First Response Time
    5.7 ms
    Total Response Time
    8.4 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    6 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    17.5 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    17.5 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    27 RGB

    Overdrive Mode First Response Heatmap Total Response Heatmap RGB Overshoot Heatmap
    Off Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Normal Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Extreme Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    7.0
    CAD @ 120Hz
    OD Transition 120Hz
    od-transition-120-extreme-0-31
    OD extreme
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    Avg. CAD
    197
    Best 10% CAD
    37
    Worst 10% CAD
    421

    Overdrive Mode CAD Heatmap RT Chart Pursuit Photo
    Off Heatmap Chart Photo
    Normal Heatmap Chart Photo
    Extreme Heatmap Chart Photo

    The CAD at 120Hz is decent. The overdrive settings perform similarly to its max refresh rate, and they all have noticeable inverse ghosting and smearing.

    Response Time @ 120Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    First Response Time
    4.2 ms
    Total Response Time
    9.4 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    10 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    8.9 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    17.5 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    37 RGB

    Overdrive Mode First Response Heatmap Total Response Heatmap RGB Overshoot Heatmap
    Off Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Normal Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Extreme Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    4.5
    CAD @ 60Hz
    OD Transition 60Hz
    od-transition-60-extreme-0-31
    OD extreme
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    Avg. CAD
    360
    Best 10% CAD
    47
    Worst 10% CAD
    1,086

    Overdrive Mode CAD Heatmap RT Chart Pursuit Photo
    Off Heatmap Chart Photo
    Normal Heatmap Chart Photo
    Extreme Heatmap Chart Photo

    The response time at 60Hz is bad. There's noticeable blur and inverse ghosting with any of the overdrive settings.

    Response Time @ 60Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    First Response Time
    4.1 ms
    Total Response Time
    19.3 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    14 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    7.8 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    35.2 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    45 RGB

    Overdrive Mode First Response Heatmap Total Response Heatmap RGB Overshoot Heatmap
    Off Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Normal Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Extreme Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    No BFI
    Maximum Frequency
    N/A
    Minimum Frequency
    N/A
    Longest Pulse Width Brightness
    N/A
    Shortest Pulse Width Brightness
    N/A
    Pulse Width Control
    No BFI
    Pulse Phase Control
    No BFI
    Pulse Amplitude Control
    No BFI
    VRR At The Same Time
    No BFI

    The Acer Nitro XV275U doesn't have an optional backlight strobing feature to reduce persistence blur.

    5.4
    VRR Flicker
    Dark Gray Flicker
    1.6 RGB
    Middle Gray Flicker
    3.9 RGB
    Light Gray Flicker
    3.9 RGB

    There's noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates. It looks worse in person than in the video, and it's most distracting in dark scenes or dark areas of bright scenes.

    10
    Image Flicker
    Flicker-Free
    Yes
    PWM Dimming Frequency
    >1000 Hz

    This monitor uses pulse width modulation (PWM) to dim its backlight at all brightness levels, but it's at such a high frequency that you won't notice it.

    Inputs
    8.9
    Input Lag
    Native Resolution @ Max Hz
    3.9 ms
    Native Resolution @ 120Hz
    5.0 ms
    Native Resolution @ 60Hz
    9.0 ms
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    N/A

    The Acer Nitro XV275U P3 has low input lag that remains consistently low, no matter the refresh rate.

    7.5
    Resolution
    Native Resolution
    2560 x 1440
    Aspect Ratio
    16:9
    Megapixels
    3.7 MP
    Pixel Density
    109 PPI
    4.9
    PS5 Compatibility
    4k @ 120Hz
    No
    4k @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz
    Yes

    Besides not supporting HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of the PS5, there aren't any compatibility issues.

    7.1
    Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
    4k @ 120Hz
    No
    4k @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz
    Yes

    As the Xbox Series X|S only supports HDR with 4k signals, you need to use a downscaled 4k signal to get HDR.

    Inputs
    DisplayPort
    1 (DP 1.2)
    DisplayPort Transmission Bandwidth
    No DisplayPort 2.1
    Mini DisplayPort
    No
    HDMI
    2 (HDMI 2.0)
    HDMI 2.1 Bandwidth
    No HDMI 2.1
    Daisy Chaining
    No
    3.5mm Audio Out
    Yes
    Ethernet
    No
    HDR10
    Yes
    Dolby Vision
    No
    USB
    USB-A Ports
    0
    USB-A Rated Speed
    No USB-A Ports
    USB-B Upstream Port
    No
    USB-C Ports
    0
    USB-C Upstream
    No USB-C Ports
    USB-C Rated Speed
    No USB-C Ports
    USB-C Power Delivery
    No USB-C Ports
    USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode
    No USB-C Ports
    Thunderbolt
    No
    macOS Compatibility

    Connection HDMI 2.0 USB-C to DP
    Max Refresh Rate 144Hz 170Hz
    VRR Range N/A 48-170Hz
    HDR Yes Yes

    The Acer Nitro XV275U works well and as expected with macOS. HDR looks decent in games, and VRR works well, but there's a noticeable VRR flicker on desktop, so it's better to disable it while working or browsing the web. If you're using a MacBook with either a DisplayPort and HDMI connection, windows return to their original position when reopening the lid or waking it up from sleep.

    Features
    Additional Features
    Speakers
    No
    RGB Illumination
    Presets
    Multiple Input Display
    No
    KVM Switch
    No
    Smart OS
    No

    The Acer Nitro XV275K has a few extra features, including:

    • ACM: Adjusts the contrast based on the content on the screen.
    • Aim Point: Displays a virtual crosshair that your game's anti-cheating tool won't detect, giving you a competitive advantage.
    • Black Boost: Adjusts gamma so that it's easier to see opponents better in games.
    • Low Blue Light: Reduces the blue light to help reduce eye strain.
    • Max Brightness: Makes the screen the brightest possible.
    • Refresh Rate Number: Displays the current refresh rate of the display.

    On-Screen Display (OSD)