Monitors come in many shapes and sizes, with designs ranging from simplistic office monitors that blend into the decor to fancy gaming monitors with extreme designs. Whether it's for work or play, there are many good monitors available for under $500. From excellent gaming features to the largest screens you can get, there is something for everyone in this price range.
We've tested more than 185 monitors, and below are our recommendations for the best monitors under $500 to buy. See our recommendations for the best gaming monitors under $200, the best budget gaming monitors, and the best 1080p monitors.
The ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV is the best monitor under $500 we've tested for office work. When it comes to office monitors, this is one of the best we've tested, with a ton of extra features to help maximize productivity and versatility that makes it suitable not only for work but also multimedia, content creation, and casual gaming. At a price that won't break the bank, this is a monitor that most people should be happy with.
You should have no trouble finding a comfortable viewing position with this monitor thanks to its outstanding ergonomics. It has a wide range for tilt, swivel, and height adjustments, and it can also rotate into portrait mode in either direction. It's also well-suited to bright office environments because it gets quite bright, enough to overcome glare in most rooms, and has good reflection handling. It uses an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, making it easy to share your screen with a co-worker if you need to.
Unfortunately, it lacks HDR support, which may be disappointing to some. That said, it has several extra features that may be very useful for office work or content creation. The bottom bezel has a built-in ruler, and it also has helpful on-screen overlays, like a ruler, grid alignment, and a tool to preview documents in actual size. Finally, it has a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alt mode and power delivery, as well as a USB hub feature. All in all, this is the best monitor under $500 for office use.
The ASUS VG279QM is the best gaming monitor under $500 with a 1080p resolution that we’ve tested. This 27 inch model has excellent gaming performance and should satisfy the most demanding gamers despite its lower price point. Like many other ASUS models, it feels very well-built and has outstanding ergonomics thanks to its wide swivel range and its ability to rotate to portrait mode.
It has an exceptionally fast response time, and the 280Hz max refresh rate delivers superb motion handling with very little blur. The input lag is also remarkably low at max refresh rate. However, it becomes extremely high at 60Hz, so this isn’t a good option for console gamers. On the plus side, unlike many monitors, it has a Black Frame Insertion feature that can be used simultaneously with variable refresh rate. It supports FreeSync natively and is certified as G-SYNC compatible.
Unfortunately, it has a low contrast ratio, so it’s not the best option for dark room gaming. On the other hand, it has wide viewing angles, so the image remains accurate when viewed from the side, which is great for co-op gaming. All in all, the ASUS is an excellent choice for gaming at 1080p and the best model we’ve tested for under $500.
The best gaming monitor under $500 with a 1440p resolution that we've tested is the Gigabyte M27Q. This versatile model sports a 27 inch screen that provides incredible immersion in games and is packed with great features. It has an IPS panel with wide viewing angles so that images don't look washed out when viewed from the side, making it a good choice for sharing content and co-op gaming. It gets very bright to combat glare, but it's not the most ideal for dark rooms as its low contrast ratio causes blacks to appear gray.
Gaming-wise, it delivers an amazingly smooth and responsive experience thanks to its 170Hz refresh rate and exceptional response times. Images look clear in fast-moving scenes, and it has both FreeSync support and G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing. It delivers a fairly decent HDR experience; however, the refresh rate is limited to 120Hz when gaming in 10-bit HDR. If you plan on using the monitor for work, you should know that it uses a BGR sub-pixel structure. It doesn't affect picture quality, but it can cause blurry text in some applications.
The many extra features can be useful for streamers and multitaskers. It has a Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture mode that lets you display signals from two input sources simultaneously, and you can control both devices with one set of peripherals with its integrated KVM switch. It also has a USB-C port, but the power delivery is limited to 10W, which is only enough for smaller portable devices like smartphones. Nonetheless, it's an excellent, feature-rich monitor that should please most gamers.
If you prefer the extra screen real estate that an ultrawide monitor provides, check out the Acer Nitro XV340CK Pbmiipphzx. While it has a slightly slower response time and a lower refresh rate than the Gigabyte M27Q, its ultrawide 21:9 aspect ratio gives you more horizontal screen space for a more immersive gaming experience. It's still an excellent choice for gaming, with low input lag and amazing response time at its max refresh rate. Unfortunately, it's slower at 60Hz but still good overall. It also supports FreeSync and is compatible with G-SYNC. It's not well-suited to very bright rooms, since its peak brightness is just okay.
All things considered, the Gigabyte is better for gaming thanks to its higher refresh rate and faster response times, but if you want an ultrawide for under $500, the Acer is a great alternative.
The best 4k monitor under $500 that we've tested is the Dell S2721QS. This 27 inch IPS model is a great choice for productivity, as it provides tons of space for multitasking, as well as an incredibly sharp image. It feels well-built, and it comes with a sturdy stand that includes basic cable management and a good amount of ergonomic adjustments. It has wide viewing angles so that the image remains accurate when viewing from the side, and it gets bright enough to combat glare.
It's great for content creation, especially for those working in the sRGB color space since it has full coverage. Its Adobe RGB coverage is good but might not be enough for photography professionals. Gradient handling is superb, and there's no color bleed. It has a pretty good response time and VRR support if you want to play some games on the side as long as you don't mind playing at 60Hz.
Unfortunately, even though it can display a wide color gamut for HDR, the overall HDR experience is rather underwhelming because it has a mediocre contrast ratio with no local dimming to improve the black level, and it just doesn't get bright enough to really make highlights pop. Also, it doesn't have any USB ports. On the upside, you do get built-in speakers and a Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture mode. It isn't the most feature-rich, but it's still a great option if you need a simple 4k monitor that performs well.
Jun 29, 2021: Verified accuracy of picks. Replaced Dell S3221QS with Dell S2721QS.
Apr 30, 2021: Replaced the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV with the ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV as 'Best Office Monitor Under $500'.
Mar 01, 2021: Minor text and structure changes. Removed Dell S2417DG due to price increase. Replaced ASUS VG27AQ with Gigabyte M27Q and added Acer Nitro XV340CK Pbmiipphzx as ultrawide alternative. Removed ASUS VG279Q. Replaced Dell S2721QS with Dell S3221QS due to low availability and price increase.
Jan 05, 2021: Updated text for clarity and structure, replaced LG 27UK650-W with Dell S2721QS.
Nov 03, 2020: Removed the Dell U2520D, added the ASUS PA278QV, and moved the ASUS VG279Q to an alternate pick.
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best monitors under $500 currently available. They're adapted to be valid for most people. Rating is based on our review, factoring in price, and feedback from our visitors.
If you would prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all our reviews of monitors under $500. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.