A 240Hz monitor is beneficial for competitive gaming as it can provide better motion handling and lower input lag than lower-refresh-rate displays. These models are available in various resolutions, from 1080p to 4k, and at different price points, so they're accessible for any budget.
When looking for a monitor, it's important to consider what type of gaming setup you have. If you have a high-end graphics card that maintains 240 fps with a high resolution, you'd benefit from a 1440p or 4k monitor. However, if you have a budget setup, then a lower-cost 1080p monitor is better, as it's easier for your PC to maintain high frame rates. The monitor's response time is another consideration for sharp motion. You'll also want it to have low input lag for a responsive feel, but most monitors have low input lag. Besides that, most modern displays support any type of VRR format to reduce screen tearing with various graphics cards.
We've bought and tested more than 390 monitors, and below are our recommendations for the best 240Hz monitors available. Check out our recommendations for the best G-SYNC monitors, the best high refresh rate monitors, and, if you prefer looking for something with a lower refresh rate, the best 144Hz monitors.
We buy and test more than 30 monitors each year, all of which we purchase ourselves, without cherry-picked units or samples. We put a lot into each unbiased, straight-to-the-point review, and there's a whole process from purchasing to publishing, involving multiple teams and people. We do more than just use the monitor for a week; we use specialized, custom tools to measure various aspects and deliver objective, data-driven results. We also consider multiple factors before making any recommendations, including the monitor's cost, its performance compared to the competition, and whether it's easy to find.
-
Best 240Hz Monitor
PC GamingResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeQD-OLEDNative Refresh RateHzMax Refresh Rate240 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution3840 x 2160The best 240Hz gaming monitor we've tested is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM. It offers high-end performance and outstanding picture quality. You need a premium setup to take advantage of its 240Hz refresh rate with a 4k resolution. However, what makes this such an amazing gaming monitor is its near-instantaneous response time, which results in minimal motion blur with fast-moving objects. It also supports both HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of modern graphics cards and consoles.
Besides that, its QD-OLED panel delivers deep blacks in dark rooms without any haloing, but the black levels rise in bright rooms, making them look purple. On the plus side, it gets bright enough for colors to look vivid and highlights to pop, making for a fantastic HDR gaming experience, and it supports Dolby Vision. Its 27-inch screen and high resolution also result in high pixel density for sharp images, but if you want a bigger 32-inch QD-OLED, look into the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM. It performs similarly, but lacks DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth.
-
Best Upper Mid-Range 240Hz Monitor
PC GamingResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeWOLEDNative Refresh RateHzMax Refresh Rate280 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution2560 x 1440If you find the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM too expensive, consider the LG 27GX700A-B instead. It has a lower 1440p resolution, which requires less bandwidth from your graphics card to hit high frame rates, making it the best 1440p 240Hz monitor. Although it has a native 280Hz refresh rate, it still performs very well at 240Hz. This is because it has a near-instantaneous response time at any refresh rate, so motion looks sharp, and it has low input lag as well. It uses the newer Tandem OLED panel, allowing it to get very bright, even brighter than the ASUS, so highlights really pop, and it fights glare well.
However, there are a few trade-offs to getting it over the ASUS. It's less accurate in HDR, prioritizing brightness over accuracy, and it's dimmer when you switch to a more accurate picture mode. Its colors aren't as vivid as on the ASUS either. It also lacks a few features that the ASUS has, like DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth. This doesn't make a big difference because you can still reach 240Hz without any sort of compression over DisplayPort.
-
Best Mid-Range 240Hz Monitor
PC GamingResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeQD-OLEDNative Refresh RateHzMax Refresh Rate240 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution2560 x 1440If you find the LG 27GX700A-B too expensive for your needs, the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q is a solid alternative that offers good value. It's another OLED, but there are some notable differences compared to the LG. For example, it has a QD-OLED panel that doesn't get as bright as the Tandem OLED panel of the LG. On top of the fact that it has raised black levels in bright rooms, making them look purple, this means the monitor is worse to use in a well-lit environment. Its colors aren't as vivid, either, because it fails to make the brightest colors pop, which is something to consider if you want to get it for HDR gaming.
That said, this monitor offers many of the benefits of any OLED, including deep blacks in dark rooms, no haloing around bright objects, and highlights that pop against the rest of the image. It also has incredible motion handling with sharp motion at any refresh rate, including up to its max of 240Hz. Lastly, it supports 240Hz signals without any compression over DisplayPort and HDMI thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.
-
Best Lower Mid-Range 240Hz Monitor
PC GamingResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeLCDSub-TypeIPSNative Refresh RateHzMax Refresh Rate240 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution2560 x 1440Should the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q still be out of your budget, there are some great models you can get for a lower cost without an OLED panel. If that's what you're interested in, look into the LG 27GR83Q-B. The biggest trade-off is that it has worse picture quality than the HyperX, with blacks that look gray and highlights that are muted, meaning it's much worse for HDR gaming. It also has more motion blur than the HyperX, but it has a consistently fast response time at any refresh rate, so fast-moving content looks good.
On the plus side, this monitor supports HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, so you can reach its max refresh rate over an HDMI connection, besides being able to reach it over DisplayPort. Although it doesn't have many extra features, it has typical gaming perks, like a virtual crosshair that your game's anti-cheat tool won't detect. Plus, it gets brighter than the HyperX, so it's a better choice for gaming in well-lit rooms.
-
Best Budget 240Hz Monitor
PC GamingResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize24"Panel TypeLCDSub-TypeIPSNative Refresh RateHzMax Refresh Rate240 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution1920 x 1080If you want the best 240Hz gaming monitor on a budget, check out the Dell SE2426HGS instead. It's a basic 1080p, 240Hz monitor that doesn't cost a lot, which helps if you're looking for a low-cost option. You lose out on a few features as you move down in price categories; in this case, it has a lower resolution than the LG 27GR83Q-B, so it doesn't deliver the same level of detail. However, with its lower resolution, your graphics card can maintain a 240 fps frame rate more easily. It also has a smaller 24-inch screen, so gaming doesn't feel as immersive, but it's still fine for solo gaming.
This monitor stands out against other low-cost displays because it has consistently good motion handling at any refresh rate. There's minimal motion blur with fast-moving objects. Unfortunately, though, it doesn't get as bright as the LG, and it fails to display a wide range of colors in HDR, so it has limited picture quality.
Notable Mentions
-
ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG:
The ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG is a premium 4k, 32-inch OLED monitor. With a WOLED panel, it maintains lower black levels better in bright rooms than the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM, so it's something to consider if you have a bright space. However, its colors aren't as vivid.
See our review -
Dell Alienware AW2725Q:
The Dell Alienware AW2725Q is a 27-inch, 4k QD-OLED that's a cheaper alternative to the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM. It performs similarly for the most part, but it doesn't get as bright, and it lacks some features, like DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth.
See our review -
Gigabyte MO27Q28G:
The Gigabyte MO27Q28G is an upper mid-range gaming monitor with the same Tandem OLED panel as the LG 27GX700A-B. While the Gigabyte is more accurate in HDR, it's dimmer, and it's usually more expensive.
See our review -
ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG:
The ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG is a 1440p OLED with the same panel as the LG 27GX700A-B. The main difference is that the ASUS has a glossy coating for clearer images, at the cost of mirror-like reflections. It's a great alternative if you want that coating, but the ASUS is harder to find.
See our review -
Dell Alienware AW2726DM:
The Dell Alienware AW2726DM is a 1440p QD-OLED that competes directly with the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q. It performs similarly for the most part and usually costs less. However, the Dell is dimmer and lacks HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.
See our review
Recent Updates
May 19, 2026:
We replaced the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM with the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q, which has better picture quality and motion handling. We also replaced the ViewSonic XG2431, which is hard to find, with the Dell SE2426HGS. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the Dell Alienware AW2723DF with the Dell Alienware AW2726DM.
Mar 26, 2026:
We replaced the Dell Alienware AW3425DW and the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG with the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG and the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG, respectively, in the Notable Mentions.
Feb 06, 2026:
We replaced the Dell G2524H with the Gigabyte MO27Q28G in the Notable Mentions.
Nov 19, 2025:
We replaced the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG with the LG 27GX700A-B, which gets brighter. We've moved the Dell G2524H to the Notable Mentions section because it's becoming increasingly difficult to find. In the Notable Mentions, we removed the Samsung Odyssey OLED G80SD S32DG80, the LG 32GS95UE-B, the MSI MPG 341CQPX QD-OLED, and the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85, and added the XG27AQDMG, the Dell Alienware AW3425DW, and the Dell Alienware AW2723DF.
Jun 09, 2025:
We replaced the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED with the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM for consistency with other recommendations. We also replaced the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED with the Dell Alienware AW2725Q in the Notable Mentions.
All Reviews
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best 240Hz monitors that are currently available. They're adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. The rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors.
If you'd prefer to make your own decision, here's the list of all of our reviews of monitors with a native 240Hz refresh rate. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.