ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM  Monitor Review

Review updated Aug 14, 2024 at 11:49am
Test bench update Feb 20, 2025 at 09:14am
Tested using Methodology v2.0.1 
ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM
7.5
PC Gaming 
6.4
Console Gaming 
7.7
Office 
7.6
Editing 
7.5
Brightness 
7.9
Response Time 
6.2
HDR Picture 
6.8
SDR Picture 
 14
  1. Recommended in:
  2. 240Hz
  3. G-SYNC

The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM is a 1440p, 240Hz gaming monitor with a 27-inch screen. Part of the Republic of Gamers lineup, it's newer and has a higher refresh rate than the ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QZ. Like the older models, it has native G-SYNC VRR support, and it has features you can only use with an NVIDIA graphics card, like NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer, to measure the latency of each part of your setup. Unlike most monitors, it has three HDMI ports, but none of them support HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, so you can only take advantage of the monitor's refresh rate with a DisplayPort connection.

How We Test Monitors

We buy and test more than 30 monitors each year, with units that we buy completely on our own, without any cherry-picked units or samples. We put a lot into each unbiased, straight-to-the-point review, and there's a whole process from purchasing to publishing, involving multiple teams and people. We do more than just use the monitor for a week; we use specialized and custom tools to measure various aspects with objective data-based results. We also consider multiple factors before making any recommendations, including the monitor's cost, its performance against the competition, and whether or not it's easy to find.

Our Verdict

7.5
PC Gaming 

The ASUS PG279QM is a good PC gaming monitor. With a 240Hz refresh rate, it's a good choice for competitive gaming, and it has native G-SYNC support to take full advantage of NVIDIA graphics cards. It even has features you can only use with NVIDIA graphics cards, like Reflex Latency Analyzer to measure the latency of your setup. Speaking of which, it has low input lag and a fast response time for sharp motion. Unfortunately, though, it has limited picture quality as it has a low contrast ratio and a bad local dimming feature that fails to improve it.

Pros
  • 240Hz refresh rate.
  • Fast response time for sharp motion.
  • Native G-SYNC support.
  • Low input lag.
  • Supports NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer.
Cons
  • Low native contrast ratio.
  • Bad edge-lit local dimming.
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.
6.4
Console Gaming 

The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM isn't bad for console gaming. Motion looks sharp, and it has low input lag for a responsive feel. However, it can't take full advantage of the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S, but you can still play 1440p games up to 120Hz with VRR support. That said, it doesn't deliver realistic images because it has a low contrast ratio that makes blacks look gray, the local dimming feature is bad, and it doesn't make highlights pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Fast response time for sharp motion.
  • Low input lag.
  • VRR works with the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S.
Cons
  • Low native contrast ratio.
  • Bad edge-lit local dimming.
  • Can't take full advantage of consoles.
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.
7.7
Office 

The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM is a good monitor for office use. It has good text clarity, and the screen is big enough to open two windows side-by-side. The image remains consistent at an angle, so you can easily share your screen with someone else, and it has impressive ergonomics, too. Lastly, it gets bright enough to fight glare, which is great if you want to use it in a well-lit room, and it has good reflection handling.

Pros
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Impressive ergonomics.
Cons
  • No dedicated office features.
7.6
Editing 

The ASUS PG279QM is good for media creators. The large screen makes it easy to see more of your timeline at once. It has wide viewing angles and impressive ergonomics, so you can easily share your screen with someone else. It also displays a wide range of colors and has an accurate sRGB mode, but you need to calibrate it for the best white balance. Unfortunately, it has low contrast and disappointing black uniformity, so it delivers limited picture quality, especially in dark rooms.

Pros
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Accurate sRGB mode.
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Impressive ergonomics.
Cons
  • Low native contrast ratio.
  • Bad edge-lit local dimming.
  • Needs calibration for the best white balance.
7.5
Brightness 

The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM has good brightness. It gets bright enough to fight glare in a well-lit room, but highlights don't stand out in HDR.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
Cons
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.
7.9
Response Time 

The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM has a very good response time. Motion looks sharp with fast-moving objects, but there's more blur at lower refresh rates.

Pros
  • Fast response time for sharp motion.
Cons
  • Some more blur at lower refresh rates.
6.2
HDR Picture 

The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM has mediocre HDR picture quality. It has a low contrast ratio, so blacks look gray in dark rooms, and it has a bad local dimming feature that fails to improve the picture quality in dark scenes. Colors don't look vivid either.

Pros
None
Cons
  • Low native contrast ratio.
  • Bad edge-lit local dimming.
6.8
SDR Picture 

The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM has okay SDR picture quality. While it displays a wide range of colors, blacks look gray due to its low contrast ratio.

Pros
  • Displays wide range of SDR colors.
Cons
  • Low native contrast ratio.
8.8
Color Accuracy 

The ASUS PG279QM has excellent color accuracy. It has an accurate sRGB mode, but you still need to calibrate it if you want the best white balance.

Pros
  • Accurate sRGB mode.
Cons
  • Needs calibration for the best white balance.
  • 7.5
    PC Gaming
  • 6.4
    Console Gaming
  • 7.7
    Office
  • 7.6
    Editing

  • Performance Usages

  • 7.5
    Brightness
  • 7.9
    Response Time
  • 6.2
    HDR Picture
  • 6.8
    SDR Picture
  • 8.8
    Color Accuracy
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Feb 21, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.0.1. This includes a new test result for DisplayPort 2.1 Transmission Bandwidth.
    2.  Updated Aug 15, 2024: Clarified that the ASUS is advertised as having Variable Overdrive.
    3.  Updated Aug 14, 2024: Updated text throughout the review according to Test Bench 2.0, mainly in the Verdict and Motion sections.
    4.  Updated Aug 09, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.0. This includes new tests for VRR Motion Performance, Refresh Rate Compliance, Cumulative Absolute Deviation (CAD), and VRR Flicker. You can read the full changelog here.

    Check Price

    27"ROG Swift PG279QM
    SEE PRICE
    Amazon.com
    27"ROG Swift PG279QM
    SEE PRICE
    Walmart.com
    27"ROG Swift PG279QM
    SEE PRICE
    B&H
    27"ROG Swift PG279QM
    BestBuy.com

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the 27-inch ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM, which is the only size available. It's part of ASUS' ROG Swift lineup of gaming monitors, and it's newer than the ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QZ, which are also native G-SYNC monitors but have lower refresh rates.

    Model Size Native Resolution Max Refresh Rate Native G-SYNC
    PG279QM 27" 1440p 240Hz Yes

    Our unit was manufactured in Aug. 2021; you can see the label here.

    Popular Monitor Comparisons

    The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM is a good 1440p, 240Hz gaming monitor that takes full advantage of NVIDIA graphics cards thanks to its native G-SYNC support. This includes features like NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer that measures the latency of your setup, which is useful to see which devices cause the most delay. It's definitely a great choice if you want a native G-SYNC monitor as the market for those is limited. However, if you don't need that, there are other 1440p, 240Hz monitors with G-SYNC compatibility that you can get for less, like the Dell Alienware AW2723DF.

    For more options, check out our recommendations for the best 1440p gaming monitors, the best G-SYNC monitors, and the best 240Hz monitors.

    LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B

    The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM and the LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B deliver very similar performance, each with strengths and weaknesses. The ASUS has better ergonomics, so it's easier to place it in an ideal viewing position. On the other hand, the LG has a faster response time at the max refresh rate, and it has an optional backlight strobing feature to improve the appearance of motion.

    ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q

    The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM is better than its predecessor, the ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q. The PG279QM has a much faster response time at 60Hz, and unlike the PG279Q, it supports HDR. The PG279QM also has slightly better text clarity. On the other hand, the PG279Q is a bit more versatile for gaming, as it has an optional backlight strobing feature, which can improve the appearance of motion.

    ASUS VG279QM

    The ASUS VG279QM is a bit better than the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM. The VG279QM has an optional backlight strobing feature, commonly known as black frame insertion, designed to improve the appearance of motion. The VG279QM also has much better ergonomics and a faster response time at the max refresh rate. On the other hand, the PG279QM has a higher resolution screen, resulting in better text clarity and a sharper image when gaming or watching videos.

    ASUS ROG Swift 360Hz PG27AQN

    The ASUS ROG Swift 360Hz PG27AQN and the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM are both excellent gaming monitors with a 1440p resolution and native G-SYNC support. The main difference is that the PG27AQN has a higher 360Hz refresh rate and quicker response times for better motion handling. Besides that, both monitors are similar, so choosing one over the other comes down to which max refresh rate you want.

    Show more 

    Video

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    Style
    Curved
    No
    Curve Radius
    Not Curved

    The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM has a very gamer-oriented design. The gamer aesthetic continues on the back, with lines etched in the back panel and a large ROG logo that doubles as RGB bias-lighting.

    8.0
    Build Quality

    The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM has great build quality. The stand is very sturdy, with metal feet that support the monitor well and don't allow for much wobble. The main body is mainly plastic, and there's a bit of flex in the back panel near the RGB logo, but there are no other noticeable issues.

    8.4
    Ergonomics
    Min Height To Top Of Panel
    15.8" (40.1 cm)
    Height Adjustment
    3.9" (9.9 cm)
    Tilt Range
    -20° to 5°
    Rotate Portrait/Landscape
    Yes, Clockwise
    Swivel Range
    -25° to 25°
    Wall Mount
    VESA 100x100

    The ergonomics are impressive. It's easy to place the screen in an ideal position or to adjust it for someone else.

    The back has a large ROG logo that doubles as an RGB light. There's a cutout in the stand for cable management , and there's an included cover that hides the inputs.

    Stand
    Base Width
    21.9" (55.5 cm)
    Base Depth
    10.1" (25.7 cm)
    Thickness (With Display)
    9.1" (23.0 cm)
    Weight (With Display)
    17.6 lbs (8.0 kg)

    The stand has a large footprint, but it supports the screen well, allowing for very minimal wobble, even at the maximum height extension.

    Display
    Size
    27"
    Housing Width
    24.2" (61.4 cm)
    Housing Height
    14.4" (36.6 cm)
    Thickness (Without Stand)
    3.5" (9.0 cm)
    Weight (Without Stand)
    10.1 lbs (4.6 kg)
    Borders Size (Bezels)
    0.3" (0.8 cm)
    Controls
    In The Box
    Power Supply
    External Brick

    • DisplayPort cable
    • HDMI cable
    • USB-B upstream cable
    • Power supply and cable
    • User manuals, including calibration report
    • Stickers
    Picture Quality
    6.2
    Contrast
    Native Contrast
    1,147 : 1
    Contrast With Local Dimming
    1,169 : 1

    The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM has mediocre contrast, so blacks look gray if you're in a dark room. Unfortunately, because the local dimming feature can only illuminate entire columns of light at once, it's ineffective at boosting contrast with the checkerboard test pattern. It's most effective at boosting contrast in scenes with larger dark areas.

    The contrast photo shows a reddish tint. This is from an interaction between the backlight and the camera sensor and it isn't noticeable in person.

    3.0
    Local Dimming
    Local Dimming
    Yes
    Backlight
    Edge

    The local dimming feature is bad and ineffective at improving dark scene performance. It's edge-lit with 32 dimming zones, so it only illuminates entire columns of light at once, resulting in terrible blooming with most content. It's especially noticeable in dark scenes with subtitles. In scenes that are dark enough for zones to turn off, it's very effective at reducing black levels, but there's a noticeable difference between zones that are on and off.

    As fast-moving objects transition between zones, it reacts quickly, but this is distracting in dark scenes as zones flicker on and off. The 'Level 3' Variable Backlight setting offers the best performance overall. Zone transitions are a bit slower with the 'Level 2' setting, and there's less flicker overall, but it also raises the black levels in zones that are off.

    8.0
    SDR Brightness
    Real Scene
    348 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    370 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    364 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    363 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    363 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    363 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    369 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    364 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    363 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    363 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    363 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.001
    Minimum Brightness
    41 cd/m²

    The SDR brightness is great. It's bright enough to overcome glare in bright rooms, and there's very little variation in brightness with different content, which is great.

    These results are from after calibration, in the 'Racing Mode' Picture Mode, with the backlight at max and Variable Backlight set to 'Level 3'.

    7.1
    HDR Brightness
    VESA DisplayHDR Certification
    DisplayHDR 400 - 1.0/1.1
    Real Scene
    469 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    486 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    478 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    477 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    477 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    432 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    485 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    477 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    476 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    476 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    430 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.007

    The HDR brightness is decent. Despite having a local dimming feature, small highlights don't pop against the rest of the image, and it fails to deliver a satisfying HDR experience. Luckily, it has good PQ EOTF tracking, meaning it displays most content at their correct brightness, and with a sharp cut-off at the peak brightness, it lets highlights get the brightest they could.

    These results are with HDR enabled, Brightness at '100', and Variable Backlight set to 'Level 3'.

    8.0
    Horizontal Viewing Angle
    Color Washout From Left
    35°
    Color Washout From Right
    34°
    Color Shift From Left
    51°
    Color Shift From Right
    53°
    Brightness Loss From Left
    41°
    Brightness Loss From Right
    41°
    Black Level Raise From Left
    70°
    Black Level Raise From Right
    70°
    Gamma Shift From Left
    59°
    Gamma Shift From Right
    59°

    The ASUS PG279QM has an impressive horizontal viewing angle. The image remains consistent from the sides, ideal for sharing your screen with others.

    6.7
    Vertical Viewing Angle
    Color Washout From Below
    29°
    Color Washout From Above
    30°
    Color Shift From Below
    36°
    Color Shift From Above
    41°
    Brightness Loss From Below
    33°
    Brightness Loss From Above
    34°
    Black Level Raise From Below
    53°
    Black Level Raise From Above
    70°
    Gamma Shift From Below
    30°
    Gamma Shift From Above
    32°

    The vertical viewing angle is okay. While it washes out from wide angles, it's still fine if you're standing up and looking down on the monitor.

    7.9
    Gray Uniformity
    50% Std. Dev.
    4.340%
    50% DSE
    0.129%

    This monitor has great gray uniformity. The sides of the screen are a bit darker than the center, and there's a bit of dirty screen effect in the center, but it isn't very noticeable.

    The gray uniformity photo shows a reddish tint. This is caused by an interaction between the backlight and the camera sensor and it isn't noticeable in person.

    5.8
    Black Uniformity
    Native Std. Dev.
    1.448%
    Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
    5.915%

    The black uniformity is disappointing. The screen appears cloudy without local dimming. Due to the limited number of dimming zones, local dimming results in worse black uniformity, with significant blooming around bright objects.

    8.8
    Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
    Picture Mode
    Racing Mode (sRGB)
    sRGB Gamut Area xy
    103.1%
    White Balance dE (Avg.)
    2.30
    Color Temperature (Avg.)
    6,663 K
    Gamma (Avg.)
    2.22
    Color dE (Avg.)
    1.36
    Contrast Setting
    50
    RGB Settings
    100-100-100
    Gamma Setting
    2.2
    Brightness Setting
    40
    Measured Brightness
    179 cd/m²
    Brightness Locked
    No

    The accuracy before calibration in the sRGB mode is excellent. It locks colors well to the sRGB color space, and most colors are accurate, but white balance is a bit off. Gamma follows the sRGB curve very closely, but most scenes are slightly darker than they should be.

    This monitor has two separate options that allow you to limit the color gamut to the 'sRGB' color space. Setting GameVisual to 'sRGB' locks the gamut, but it also severely limits the picture settings that you can change. Setting Display SDR Input to 'sRGB' also locks the color gamut to the sRGB color space but leaves all picture settings unlocked, which is useful for customization. Both sRGB modes achieve roughly the same accuracy, but 'Racing Mode' with the separate sRGB clamp delivers the best results overall without any limitations, which is what we used for testing.

    9.7
    Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
    Picture Mode
    Racing Mode
    sRGB Gamut Area xy
    99.1%
    White Balance dE (Avg.)
    0.65
    Color Temperature (Avg.)
    6,498 K
    Gamma (Avg.)
    2.19
    Color dE (Avg.)
    0.41
    Contrast Setting
    50
    RGB Settings
    100-94-98
    Gamma Setting
    2.2
    Brightness Setting
    18
    Measured Brightness
    103 cd/m²
    ICC Profile
    Download

    The accuracy after calibration is fantastic Any remaining issues with the white balance and color accuracy aren't noticeable, and gamma follows the sRGB target curve nearly perfectly. The color temperature is extremely close to the calibration target.

    9.9
    SDR Color Gamut
    sRGB Coverage xy
    99.6%
    sRGB Picture Mode
    Racing Mode
    Adobe RGB Coverage xy
    99.9%
    Adobe RGB Picture Mode
    Racing Mode

    The SDR color gamut is fantastic. It has complete coverage of both the sRGB and the Adobe RGB color spaces, but it oversaturates colors in Adobe RGB.

    9.1
    HDR Color Gamut
    Wide Color Gamut
    Yes
    DCI-P3 Coverage xy
    95.8%
    DCI-P3 Picture Mode
    HDR Mode
    Rec. 2020 Coverage xy
    83.0%
    Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
    HDR Mode

    The HDR color gamut is fantastic. It has nearly complete coverage of the DCI-P3 color space used by most current HDR content. It also has great coverage of the wider Rec. 2020 color space, and there are minimal tone mapping issues with each color space.

    8.2
    HDR Color Volume
    1,000 cd/m² DCI-P3 Coverage ICtCp
    75.7%
    DCI-P3 Picture Mode
    HDR Mode
    10,000 cd/m² Rec. 2020 Coverage ICtCp
    37.0%
    Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
    HDR Mode

    The HDR color volume is great. Although it displays a wide range of colors, it doesn't make them look very vivid.

    7.5
    Text Clarity
    Pixel Type
    IPS
    Subpixel Layout
    RGB

    The ASUS PG279QM has good text clarity. Running the Windows ClearType wizard helps improve text clarity (top photo), especially on diagonal or curved lines.

    7.7
    Reflections
    Screen Finish
    Matte
    Total Reflections
    4.7%
    Indirect Reflections
    2.5%
    Calculated Direct Reflections
    2.2%

    The reflection handling is good The matte coating helps reduce the intensity of direct reflections but also adds a slightly hazy look.

    The reflection photos show a reddish tint. This isn't a calibration artifact, as the monitor has a near-perfect white balance and color temperature after calibration. It isn't noticeable in person, and it's an interaction between the backlight and the camera sensor.

    9.9
    Gradient
    Color Depth
    10 Bit

    This monitor has remarkable gradient handling, with almost no noticeable banding in areas of similar color.

    Motion
    8.0
    Refresh Rate
    Native Refresh Rate
    240 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate
    240 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over DP
    240 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
    144 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over DP @ 10-bit
    144 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI @ 10-Bit
    60 Hz

    Due to bandwidth limitations over HDMI, you can only reach the max refresh rate over DisplayPort. If you want a 1440p monitor with an even higher 360Hz refresh rate, check out the ASUS ROG Swift 360Hz PG27AQN.

    Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
    Variable Refresh Rate
    Yes
    FreeSync
    Compatible (Tested)
    G-SYNC
    Yes (Native)
    VRR Maximum
    240 Hz
    VRR Minimum
    < 20 Hz
    VRR Supported Connectors
    DisplayPort, HDMI

    NVIDIA VRR Min VRR Max
    DisplayPort <20Hz 240Hz
    HDMI <20Hz 144Hz

    AMD VRR Min VRR Max
    DisplayPort <20Hz 240Hz
    HDMI <20Hz 144Hz

    On top of supporting native G-SYNC and working with FreeSync, this monitor also supports HDMI Forum VRR.

    8.1
    VRR Motion Performance
    See details on graph tool
    Recommended VRR OD Setting
    Esports
    Variable Overdrive Advertised
    Yes
    Avg. CAD
    153
    Best CAD
    121
    Worst CAD
    168

    Refresh Rate CAD Heatmap RT Chart Pursuit Photo
    239 Heatmap Chart Photo
    165 Heatmap Chart Photo
    144 Heatmap Chart Photo
    120 Heatmap Chart Photo
    100 Heatmap Chart Photo
    80 Heatmap Chart Photo
    60 Heatmap Chart Photo

    The motion handling is great across the VRR range. Motion looks sharp with the 'Esports' overdrive setting, and while it's consistent across the VRR range, there's more inverse ghosting and blur at lower refresh rates.

    7.7
    Refresh Rate Compliance
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Compliance @ Max Hz
    42%
    Compliance @ 120 FPS
    61%
    Compliance @ 60 FPS
    81%

    The refresh rate compliance is good. It performs best at 60Hz, as its response time isn't fast enough to make full color transitions before the monitor draws the next frame at high refresh rates.

    8.2
    CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
    OD Transition Max Refresh Rate
    od-transition-max-refresh-rate-esports-0-31
    OD esports
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Esports
    Avg. CAD
    121
    Best 10% CAD
    71
    Worst 10% CAD
    232

    Overdrive Mode CAD Heatmap RT Chart Pursuit Photo
    Off Heatmap Chart Photo
    Normal Heatmap Chart Photo
    Esports Heatmap Chart Photo
    Extreme Heatmap Chart Photo

    The CAD at the max refresh rate is great. Motion looks sharp with the recommended overdrive of 'Esports', as it has less blur than 'Normal' and less inverse ghosting than 'Extreme'.

    Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Esports
    First Response Time
    3.9 ms
    Total Response Time
    5.2 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    3 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    9.1 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    9.1 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    10 RGB

    Overdrive Mode First Response Heatmap Total Response Heatmap RGB Overshoot Heatmap
    Off Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Normal Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Esports Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Extreme Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    7.9
    CAD @ 120Hz
    OD Transition 120Hz
    od-transition-120-esports-0-31
    OD esports
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Esports
    Avg. CAD
    155
    Best 10% CAD
    94
    Worst 10% CAD
    238

    Overdrive Mode CAD Heatmap RT Chart Pursuit Photo
    Off Heatmap Chart Photo
    Normal Heatmap Chart Photo
    Esports Heatmap Chart Photo
    Extreme Heatmap Chart Photo

    The CAD at 120Hz is very good. Like at the max refresh rate, the recommended overdrive is 'Esports', but it has a bit more inverse ghosting. If that bothers you, 'Normal' is better to use, but it has slightly more blur.

    Response Time @ 120Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Esports
    First Response Time
    4.7 ms
    Total Response Time
    9.5 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    7 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    7.1 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    11.4 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    11 RGB

    Overdrive Mode First Response Heatmap Total Response Heatmap RGB Overshoot Heatmap
    Off Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Normal Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Esports Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Extreme Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    7.6
    CAD @ 60Hz
    OD Transition 60Hz
    od-transition-60-esports-0-31
    OD esports
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Esports
    Avg. CAD
    165
    Best 10% CAD
    95
    Worst 10% CAD
    273

    Overdrive Mode CAD Heatmap RT Chart Pursuit Photo
    Off Heatmap Chart Photo
    Normal Heatmap Chart Photo
    Esports Heatmap Chart Photo
    Extreme Heatmap Chart Photo

    The CAD at 60Hz. Once again, the 'Esports' overdrive provides the best performance as there isn't distracting inverse ghosting, but 'Normal' performs similarly.

    Response Time @ 60Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Esports
    First Response Time
    6.1 ms
    Total Response Time
    7.4 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    1 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    11.6 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    11.6 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    6 RGB

    Overdrive Mode First Response Heatmap Total Response Heatmap RGB Overshoot Heatmap
    Off Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Normal Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Esports Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Extreme Heatmap Heatmap Heatmap
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    No BFI
    Maximum Frequency
    N/A
    Minimum Frequency
    N/A
    Longest Pulse Width Brightness
    N/A
    Shortest Pulse Width Brightness
    N/A
    Pulse Width Control
    No BFI
    Pulse Phase Control
    No BFI
    Pulse Amplitude Control
    No BFI
    VRR At The Same Time
    No BFI

    The ASUS PG279QM doesn't have an optional backlight strobing feature, commonly known as black frame insertion.

    9.5
    VRR Flicker
    Dark Gray Flicker
    0.6 RGB
    Middle Gray Flicker
    0.1 RGB
    Light Gray Flicker
    0.1 RGB

    This monitor doesn't have any noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates, which is fantastic for gaming.

    10
    Image Flicker
    Flicker-Free
    Yes
    PWM Dimming Frequency
    0 Hz

    This monitor has a completely flicker-free backlight at all brightness levels, which is great as it can help reduce eye strain if you're sensitive to it.

    Inputs
    8.9
    Input Lag
    Native Resolution @ Max Hz
    3.1 ms
    Native Resolution @ 120Hz
    6.6 ms
    Native Resolution @ 60Hz
    14.9 ms
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    N/A

    The input lag is very low for a responsive feel. While it increases a bit more than expected at 60Hz, it's still fine for gaming.

    7.5
    Resolution
    Native Resolution
    2560 x 1440
    Aspect Ratio
    16:9
    Megapixels
    3.7 MP
    Pixel Density
    109 PPI
    5.0
    PS5 Compatibility
    4k @ 120Hz
    No
    4k @ 60Hz
    No
    1440p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    4.7
    Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
    4k @ 120Hz
    No
    4k @ 60Hz
    No
    1440p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz
    Yes

    You need to use the console's HDMI override settings for 1440p @ 60Hz to work, which disables VRR. However, because the console only supports HDR with 4k signals, you can't get any HDR from the Xbox on this monitor.

    Inputs Photos
    Video And Audio Ports
    DisplayPort
    1 (DP 1.4)
    DisplayPort Transmission Bandwidth
    No DisplayPort 2.1
    Mini DisplayPort
    No
    HDMI
    3 (HDMI 2.0)
    HDMI 2.1 Bandwidth
    No HDMI 2.1
    DVI
    No
    VGA
    No
    Daisy Chaining
    No
    3.5mm Audio Out
    1
    3.5mm Audio In
    No
    3.5mm Microphone In
    No
    USB
    USB-A Ports
    2
    USB-A Rated Speed
    5Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 1)
    USB-B Upstream Port
    Yes
    USB-C Ports
    0
    USB-C Upstream
    No USB-C Ports
    USB-C Rated Speed
    No USB-C Ports
    USB-C Power Delivery
    No USB-C Ports
    USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode
    No USB-C Ports
    Thunderbolt
    No
    macOS Compatibility

    There are no serious issues with macOS. VRR and HDR work properly in game and on the desktop. There's a slight issue with sleep, as window positions are shifted around when waking up from sleep.

    Features
    Additional Features
    HDR10
    Yes
    Speakers
    Yes
    RGB Illumination
    Controllable
    Multiple Input Display
    No
    KVM Switch
    No

    The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM has a few additional features available. Some of them include:

    • Crosshair: There are six virtual crosshairs to choose from. Unlike software virtual crosshairs, these can't be detected by your games.
    • FPS Counter: Displays the frame rate received from the source in real time. It can also display a graph of the frame rate over time.
    • Dark Boost: Adjusts gamma to make it easier to spot other players/enemies in shadows.
    • NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer: By connecting a compatible mouse to the red USB port at the back of the monitor, this system allows you to analyze the total input latency of your computer.
    On-Screen Display (OSD)