A 32-inch monitor offers more screen space for multitasking or gaming than smaller screens. There are a ton of great options to choose from, including 1440p and 4k resolutions. Many have gaming features, and premium models often support HDMI and DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of modern graphics cards or gaming consoles. However, lower-end 32-inch models aren't as common, and they tend to cost more and offer less value than smaller entry-level monitors, like 27-inch models. With that in mind, it's better to spend more on a 32-inch screen, as premium options usually offer great performance.
When looking for a new monitor, it's important to consider your budget and what you need it for. If you want a gaming display, having a fast response time and low input lag helps result in a responsive gaming experience with minimal blur, and most monitors have low input lag anyway. On the other hand, sharp text and high brightness are useful for work, especially if you want it to fight glare in a well-lit room. There's no perfect solution for everyone, but understanding the available options and your needs is a good place to start.
We've bought and tested over 415 monitors, and below, you'll find our top picks for the best 32-inch monitors available to buy. If you're interested in other sizes, see our recommendations for the best 24-25-inch monitors, the best 27-inch monitors, and the best 34-49-inch monitors. If you want more info about monitor sizes, check out the best monitor sizes for gaming.
We buy and test more than 30 monitors each year, all of which we purchase ourselves, without cherry-picked units or samples. We put a lot into each unbiased, straight-to-the-point review, and there's a whole process from purchasing to publishing, involving multiple teams and people. We do more than just use the monitor for a week; we use specialized, custom tools to measure various aspects and deliver objective, data-driven results. We also consider multiple factors before making any recommendations, including the monitor's cost, its performance compared to the competition, and whether it's easy to find.
-
Best 32-Inch Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingOfficeEditingBrightnessResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureColor AccuracySize32"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeQD-OLEDMax Refresh Rate240 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution3840 x 2160The best 32-inch monitor we've tested is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3. It's a high-end 4k OLED that's great for different uses. It's focused on gaming with a high 240Hz refresh rate, and combined with its near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion, gaming feels smooth. It also has low input lag so that it adds minimal delay to your gaming setup, which is ideal for reaction-based games. It even has high-bandwidth DisplayPort and HDMI 2.1 ports to make full use of the latest graphics cards and gaming consoles. This includes supporting 4k signals up to 120Hz with a PS5 or Xbox Series X.
Besides that, it also offers fantastic picture quality. It has a QD-OLED panel that displays deep blacks in dark rooms, without any haloing around bright objects. Highlights pop, and it displays a wide range of vivid colors, making for an impressive HDR viewing experience. It also uses a newer-generation QD-OLED panel that gets brighter than older models, and its coating is effective at reducing glare in well-lit rooms. Plus, it has a small USB hub that includes a USB-C port with 90W of power delivery, which is ideal if you want to connect your laptop. It also has a KVM switch that makes it easy to change sources and use the same devices on both, so it's a great choice if you need something for productivity. Keep in mind that OLEDs risk burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time, but this is less of a concern if you change up what you have on screen.
-
Best Upper Mid-Range 32-Inch Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingOfficeEditingBrightnessResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureColor AccuracySize32"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeWOLEDMax Refresh Rate480 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution3840 x 2160If the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3 is too expensive for your budget and you don't need all of its premium features, the LG 32GX870B-B is a good alternative that you can get for less. Although it's an OLED like the ASUS, it uses a different panel type. Its WOLED display has less vivid colors, so content doesn't look as punchy. The LG doesn't get as bright, either, but it's still fine to use it in a well-lit room because it maintains deeper black levels in well-lit spaces than on the ASUS. Besides that, it offers fantastic picture quality with deep blacks that pop against bright highlights, and no haloing around bright objects.
It actually has some advantages for gaming over the ASUS. Despite having the same 4k resolution and 240Hz refresh rate, it also has a dual-mode feature to boost it to a 480Hz refresh rate with a 1080p resolution. This makes it versatile for playing different types of games. Combined with its near-instantaneous response time, it's a fantastic choice for gaming. Like the ASUS, it also has high-bandwidth DisplayPort and HDMI 2.1 ports to make full use of the modern graphics cards and gaming consoles. Although it doesn't have a KVM switch to help with multitasking, it at least has a small USB hub, including a USB-C port with 90W of power delivery to connect a laptop.
-
Best Mid-Range 32-Inch Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingOfficeEditingBrightnessResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureColor AccuracySize32"Panel TypeLCDSub-TypeVAMax Refresh Rate165 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution3840 x 2160Should you want a cheaper option than the LG 32GX870B-B, the TCL 32R84 offers solid value as a mid-range option. The biggest differences versus the LG come down to their different panel types. The TCL doesn't have an OLED panel, and instead uses Mini LED backlighting, which allows the monitor to get much brighter. It fights glare very easily in bright spaces, and most highlights stand out in HDR. It also has a high native contrast ratio for deep blacks, which its effective local dimming feature helps improve further, but not to the same level as an OLED. A downside is that there's haloing around bright objects, and it dims really small highlights, like in a starfield. This is what you have to expect at a lower cost, but it still delivers great HDR picture quality regardless.
As for gaming, it has a native 4k resolution for detailed images, and its 165Hz refresh rate helps most gamers, but you can't boost it any further like on the LG. It also has worse motion handling, with more blur and black smearing in dark scenes. Although it lacks DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth, its HDMI 2.1 ports are useful for gaming with a console. Plus, this monitor is more versatile than the LG for productivity, as it has a KVM switch that makes multitasking easy, and it doesn't risk burn-in either. This means you can use it only for work and not worry about damaging the screen.
-
Best Budget 32-Inch Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingOfficeEditingBrightnessResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureColor AccuracySize32"Panel TypeLCDSub-TypeVAMax Refresh Rate180 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution2560 x 1440If you're looking for a 32-inch monitor on a budget, there are a few good options, but you'll have to sacrifice performance. A monitor like the Dell Alienware AW3225DM is decent overall, but it's a step down compared to the TCL 32R84. It has a lower 1440p resolution, so text doesn't look as sharp, and images aren't as detailed. It also has much worse picture quality, especially in HDR, because it doesn't have a Mini LED local dimming feature that helps it display deep blacks with bright highlights and minimal haloing. It does have an edge-lit local dimming feature that only turns on in HDR, but it causes noticeable haloing around bright objects, so it has worse overall picture quality. On the plus side, it has a high native contrast ratio, so it displays fairly deep blacks in dark rooms without its local dimming feature in SDR.
Regardless, this monitor has some useful gaming perks, like a slightly higher 180Hz max refresh rate than the TCL. Although it has smearing in dark scenes and blur with fast-moving objects, motion still looks fine enough for playing slower-paced games. It can't take full advantage of consoles the same way the TCL can, as this monitor lacks HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. This means it can only reach a max of 60Hz with 4k signals from a PS5 or Xbox Series X|S, but it still supports a 120Hz refresh rate with 1440p signals instead.
Notable Mentions
-
ASUS ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV:
The ASUS ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV is a high-end 6k monitor that's better for work than the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3. It delivers sharper text, and it has more productivity features, like a bigger USB hub and Thunderbolt support. However, it has worse picture quality, especially in HDR, and it has fewer gaming features.
See our review -
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCWM:
The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCWM is a high-end OLED that competes with the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3. The PG32UCWM delivers sharper text, so it's the better choice for productivity or playing text-based games. However, it's dimmer and has less vivid colors than the PG32UCDM Gen3.
See our review -
Samsung Odyssey OLED G73SH S32HG732S:
The Samsung Odyssey OLED G73SH S32HG732S is an upper mid-range 4k OLED that's cheaper than the LG 32GX870B-B. The Samsung performs similarly for the most part, but it has a lower refresh rate than the LG.
See our review -
Dell U3225QE:
The Dell U3225QE is a premium 4k monitor that's packed with more productivity features than the TCL 32R84. It's useful if you need something for work and want an included USB hub with Thunderbolt 4 support. However, it has worse picture quality than the TCL because it lacks Mini LED backlighting.
See our review
Recent Updates
Oct 28, 2026:
We replaced the Samsung Odyssey OLED G73SH S32HG732S with the LG 32GX870B-B in the upper mid-range category because the LG has a higher refresh rate for gaming. In the mid-range category, we replaced the Dell S3225QC with the cheaper TCL 32R84. In the Notable Mentions, we removed the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG and the Dell S3225QS, and we added the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCWM and the Samsung G73SH.
Sep 01, 2026:
We replaced the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG with the Samsung Odyssey OLED G73SH S32HG732S in the upper mid-range category because the Samsung is cheaper. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the LG 32GS95UE-B with the XG32UCWMG.
Jul 09, 2026:
We added the new ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3 as the 'Best 32-Inch Monitor' to better represent the current market. With this, we renamed the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG to the 'Best Upper Mid-Range 32-Inch Monitor,' and we removed the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85, which has worse picture quality. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM with the ASUS ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV.
May 22, 2026:
We removed the Samsung Odyssey G70D S32DG70 as it doesn't fit into the scope of the article. Instead, we added the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 as the 'Best Upper Mid-Range 32-Inch Monitor,' and we renamed the Dell S3225QC to the 'Best Mid-Range 32-Inch Monitor.' We also added the Dell S3225QS to the Notable Mentions.
Apr 03, 2026:
We replaced the LG 32GR93U-B with the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 in the Notable Mentions.
All Reviews
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best 32-inch monitors currently available in the United States, including the best 32-inch gaming monitors. They're adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. The rating is based on our review, feedback from visitors, and price. For example, two monitors may perform the same, but the cheaper one will be recommended. We also consider availability, as we don't recommend a monitor that's hard to find.
If you'd prefer to make your own decision, here's the list of all of our 32-inch monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.