A 32-inch monitor has many benefits, offering more screen space to multitask or for an immersive gaming experience compared to a smaller display. There are a ton of great 32-inch monitors to choose from, but while they're growing in popularity, they still aren't as common as 27-inch displays. Luckily, they usually have a 4k or 1440p resolution, and premium models tend to have HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of modern graphics cards or gaming consoles. However, lower-end 32-inch models don't tend to be as good as smaller budget monitors.
When looking for a new monitor, it's important to consider your budget and what you need the display for, like if you want something simple or prefer the latest premium options. If you want a gaming display, having a fast response time and low input lag help result in a responsive gaming experience, but most monitors have low input lag. There's no perfect solution for everyone, but understanding the available options is a good place to start.
We've bought and tested over 330 monitors, and below, you'll find our top picks for the best monitors available in a 32-inch size. If you're interested in other sizes, see our recommendations for the best 24-25 inch monitors, the best 27-inch monitors, and the best 34-49 inch monitors.
The best 32-inch monitor we've tested is the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80. It's a 32-inch, 4k monitor with a QD-OLED panel that makes it fantastic for different uses. It's focused on gaming, as it has a 240Hz refresh rate and a near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion, also making it the best 32-inch gaming monitor. Its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth makes it a great choice for both PC gaming with modern graphics cards and for console gaming. It also delivers fantastic picture quality thanks to the near-infinite contrast ratio that helps it display deep blacks in dark rooms. Highlights pop in HDR, and colors are vivid for a remarkable HDR experience.
It has a few useful features, like Tizen OS built-in, so you can stream movies and shows without even needing your PC. It also has a USB hub with two USB-A ports to connect your devices, but if you want something with a USB-C port, the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED is also a great choice. However, it's harder to find than the Samsung at times. One thing to know is that OLEDs like these risk burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time, but using the monitor for varied usage reduces the risk of burn-in.
If you find that the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 is too expensive, or you're worried about burn-in, then check out the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75. It's a 4k monitor like the G80SD, but without a QD-OLED panel, it doesn't display the same deep blacks and bright highlights. That's the trade-off for getting something cheaper, but it has Mini LED backlighting that helps it display deep blacks. It doesn't have a near-instantaneous response time either, but the motion handling is still good enough for gaming, and it has a 165Hz refresh rate. However, if you want something with a 240Hz refresh rate, the higher-end Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 is something else to consider, but it costs more.
Since the Neo G7 doesn't risk burn-in like the Samsung, it's a great choice for office work. It delivers sharp text, gets bright enough to fight glare, and has good reflection handling, which is great if you want to use it in a well-lit room.
If the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 is still too much out of your price range, the Gigabyte M32U is a good mid-range alternative. Although it has a 4k resolution like the Samsung, leading to sharp and detailed images, there are a few trade-offs for getting it. It doesn't have Mini LED backlighting, and its local dimming is much worse, making blacks look gray in dark rooms. Highlights don't pop in HDR, either.
Besides that, it has different features than the Samsung, making it even more versatile for work purposes. For example, its KVM switch makes it easy to use the same keyboard and mouse with two different computers connected to the monitor. It also has a USB-C port that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, but with only 15W of power delivery, it isn't enough to charge your laptop while using it. If you want something that delivers more power over USB-C and also has a bigger USB hub, the Dell U3223QE is another great choice, but it doesn't have as many gaming features as the Gigabyte.
If you're on a more limited budget, you can save even more money by getting something with a 1440p resolution, which is useful if you don't want a 4k monitor like the Gigabyte M32U. The LG 32GP850-B is another good option, which you can also find as the 32GP83B-B at different retailers, and both variants perform the same. It has lower pixel density than the Gigabyte, so images look less sharp and detailed, and it doesn't have as many productivity features as the Gigabyte, as it lacks a KVM switch and USB-C port, but that's the trade-off for getting something cheaper. Still, it's fine if you need something for working and gaming in a well-lit room, as it gets bright enough to fight glare in a well-lit room and has wide viewing angles.
In terms of gaming, it has a slightly higher 180Hz refresh rate than the Gigabyte, but you can only achieve that with a DisplayPort connection, as it's limited to HDMI 2.0 bandwidth. That said, it still offers good motion handling like the Gigabyte, so fast-moving objects are crisp, and it has a handful of gaming features like crosshairs and a black stabilizer.
If you're looking for a 32-inch monitor on a budget, there are a few good options, but you'll have to sacrifice performance. A monitor like the LG 32GN650-B is decent overall, and you can also find it as the 32GN63T-B at different retailers, as both variants perform the same. Sadly, though, it's a step down from the LG 32GP850-B/32GP83B-B, as it doesn't get as bright and has worse motion handling with more smearing. However, it still has a 165Hz refresh rate, and it's good enough if you want an entry-level gaming monitor.
One difference is that the 32GN650-B has a different panel type, resulting in a higher native contrast for deeper blacks, which is great for dark room gaming. However, it also has worse viewing angles, so the edges of the screen look washed out if you sit close or share your screen with a friend.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF is a competitor of the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 as the best 32-inch gaming monitor since it also uses a QD-OLED panel. It performs similarly but tends to cost more, and it has a curved screen, which may not be to everyone's liking.
See our reviewSep 20, 2024: We replaced the Dell Alienware AW3225QF with the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 for consistency with other recommendations and renamed it the 'Best 32-Inch Monitor.' We also replaced the Samsung Odyssey Neo G87 S32BG85 with the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 and renamed it the 'Best Upper Mid-Range Monitor' to match its market position. Lastly, we replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM with the AW3225QF in the Notable Mentions to better represent the current market.
Jul 03, 2024: Removed the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 from Notable Mentions as it's now mentioned in the text of the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85. Added the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM to the Notable Mentions.
May 17, 2024: Added the Dell Alienware AW3225QF as the 'Best 32-Inch Gaming Monitor' to reflect the current market and what people are searching for. Replaced the Dell U3223QE with the Dell S3221QS in the Notable Mentions to reflect changes in the text of the recommendation.
Mar 25, 2024: Moved the LG 32GR93U-B to Notable Mentions because it's similar in price to the Gigabyte M32U and has fewer features. Replaced the Samsung Odyssey G7/G70B S32BG70 with the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 in Notable Mentions because the Neo G7 is better overall. Removed the Dell Alienware AW3225QF from Notable Mentions, as it's mentioned as an alternative in the text of the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85.
Jan 30, 2024: Added the Dell Alienware AW3225QF to the Notable Mentions.
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best monitors currently available with a 32-inch screen, including the best 32-inch gaming monitors. They are adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. Rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors.
If you would prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all of our 32-inch monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.