A 32-inch monitor offers more screen space for multitasking or gaming than smaller screens. There are a ton of great options to choose from, including with 1440p and 4k resolutions. Many have gaming features, and premium models often support HDMI and DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of modern graphics cards or gaming consoles. However, lower-end 32-inch models aren't as common, and they tend to cost more and offer less value than smaller entry-level monitors, like 27-inch models. With that in mind, it's better to spend more on a 32-inch screen, as premium options usually offer great performance.
When looking for a new monitor, it's important to consider your budget and what you need it for. If you want a gaming display, having a fast response time and low input lag helps result in a responsive gaming experience with minimal blur, but most monitors have low input lag anyway. On the other hand, a wide viewing angle and high brightness are useful for work, especially if you want it to fight glare in a well-lit room. There's no perfect solution for everyone, but understanding the available options and your needs is a good place to start.
We've bought and tested over 405 monitors, and below, you'll find our top picks for the best 32-inch monitors available to buy. If you're interested in other sizes, see our recommendations for the best 24-25-inch monitors, the best 27-inch monitors, and the best 34-49-inch monitors. If you want more info about monitor sizes, check out the best monitor sizes for gaming.
We buy and test more than 30 monitors each year, all of which we purchase ourselves, without cherry-picked units or samples. We put a lot into each unbiased, straight-to-the-point review, and there's a whole process from purchasing to publishing, involving multiple teams and people. We do more than just use the monitor for a week; we use specialized, custom tools to measure various aspects and deliver objective, data-driven results. We also consider multiple factors before making any recommendations, including the monitor's cost, its performance compared to the competition, and whether it's easy to find.
-
Best 32-Inch Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingOfficeEditingBrightnessResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureColor AccuracySize32"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeQD-OLEDMax Refresh Rate240 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution3840 x 2160The best 32-inch monitor we've tested is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3. It's a high-end 4k OLED that's great for different uses. It's focused on gaming with a high 240Hz refresh rate, and combined with its near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion, gaming feels smooth. It also has low input lag for a responsive feel, which is ideal for playing reaction-based games. It even has high-bandwidth DisplayPort and HDMI 2.1 ports to make full use of the latest graphics cards and gaming consoles. This includes supporting 4k signals up to 120Hz with a PS5 or Xbox Series X.
Besides that, it also offers fantastic picture quality. It has a QD-OLED panel that displays deep blacks in dark rooms, without any haloing around bright objects. Highlights pop, and it displays a wide range of vivid colors, making for an impressive HDR viewing experience. It also uses a newer-generation QD-OLED panel that gets brighter than older models, and its coating is effective at reducing glare in well-lit rooms. Plus, it has a small USB hub that includes a USB-C port with 90W of power delivery, which is ideal if you want to connect your laptop. It also has a KVM switch that makes it easy to change sources and use the same devices on both, so it's a great choice if you need something for productivity.
-
Best Upper Mid-Range 32-Inch Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingOfficeEditingBrightnessResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureColor AccuracySize32"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeWOLEDMax Refresh Rate330 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution3840 x 2160If the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3 is too expensive for your budget and you don't need all of its premium features, the Samsung Odyssey OLED G73SH S32HG732S is a good alternative that you can get for less. Although it's an OLED like the ASUS, it uses a different panel type. Its WOLED display has less vivid colors, so content doesn't look as punchy. The Samsung doesn't get as bright, either, but it's still fine to use it in a well-lit room because it maintains deeper black levels in well-lit spaces than on the ASUS. Besides that, it offers fantastic picture quality with deep blacks that pop against bright highlights, and no haloing around bright objects.
It actually has some advantages for gaming over the ASUS. Despite having the same 4k resolution and a lower 165Hz refresh rate, it also has a dual-mode feature to boost it to a 330Hz refresh rate with a 1080p resolution. This makes it versatile for playing different types of games. Combined with its near-instantaneous response time, it's a fantastic choice for gaming. However, it lacks DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth to take advantage of the latest graphics cards. A downside is that it doesn't have a USB hub to connect your devices, like on the ASUS, so you need to make sure your computer has enough ports to connect all your devices.
-
Best Mid-Range 32-Inch Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingOfficeEditingBrightnessResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureColor AccuracySize32"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeQD-OLEDMax Refresh Rate120 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution3840 x 2160Should the Samsung Odyssey OLED G73SH S32HG732S still be too much out of your price range, the Dell S3225QC offers good value at a lower price. It's a 4k display like the Samsung, but there are a few trade-offs to getting this monitor. It has a lower 120Hz refresh rate, so it doesn't offer the same smooth feel for gaming. Another difference is that it uses a QD-OLED panel, as opposed to the WOLED panel of the Samsung. The main downside of this is that its black levels rise in bright rooms, making them look purple, and it doesn't get as bright to fight glare either. You need to use it in a dark room to get the most out of it with its deep blacks and vivid colors.
Despite these differences, the Dell is still a fantastic monitor. Its near-instantaneous response time means motion looks sharp, but it lacks a dual-mode feature to boost the refresh rate any further. It also takes advantage of modern gaming consoles thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and the fact that it supports Dolby Vision with an Xbox. Lastly, it has some extra productivity perks compared to the Samsung, including 90W of power delivery over USB-C, so it's versatile for more than just gaming if you want to connect your work laptop.
-
Best Budget 32-Inch Monitor
PC GamingConsole GamingOfficeEditingBrightnessResponse TimeHDR PictureSDR PictureColor AccuracySize32"Panel TypeLCDSub-TypeVAMax Refresh Rate180 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution2560 x 1440If you're looking for a 32-inch monitor on a budget, there are a few good options, but you'll have to sacrifice performance. A monitor like the Dell Alienware AW3225DM is decent overall, but it's a step down compared to the Dell S3225QC. It has a lower 1440p resolution, so text doesn't look as sharp, and images aren't as detailed. It also has much worse picture quality, especially in HDR, because it doesn't have a QD-OLED panel with the same deep blacks, bright highlights, and vivid colors. However, this is what you have to expect from an entry-level model.
Regardless, this monitor has some useful gaming perks, like a higher 180Hz max refresh rate than the S3225QC. Although it has more smearing in dark scenes and blur than the S3225QC with fast-moving objects, motion still looks fine, especially for a VA panel. It also has a high contrast ratio, so it displays fairly deep blacks in dark rooms. However, it has a terrible local dimming feature, which only turns on in HDR, that worsens picture quality due to haloing in dark scenes. On the plus side, this monitor gets very bright, which is a nice touch for an entry-level monitor, so it's decent to use in a well-lit room.
Notable Mentions
-
ASUS ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV:
The ASUS ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV is a high-end 6k monitor that's better for work than the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3. It delivers sharper text, and it has more productivity features, like a bigger USB hub and Thunderbolt support. However, it has worse picture quality, especially in HDR, and it has fewer gaming features.
See our review -
ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG:
The ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG is an upper mid-range OLED that has a higher 240Hz native refresh rate than the Samsung Odyssey OLED G73SH S32HG732S. The ASUS also has a dual mode to boost the refresh rate to 480Hz. It's worth considering if you want the higher refresh rate, but it costs more than the Samsung.
See our review -
Dell U3225QE:
The Dell U3225QE is a premium 4k monitor that's packed with more productivity features than the Dell S3225QC. It's useful if you need something for work and want an included USB hub with Thunderbolt 4 support. However, it has worse picture quality than the S3225QC because it has a lower contrast ratio.
See our review -
Dell S3225QS:
The Dell S3225QS is an entry-level 4k monitor that delivers sharper text than the Dell Alienware AW3225DM. It's a good choice if you want a budget-friendly option for work, but it isn't as bright as the AW3225DM.
See our review
Recent Updates
Sep 01, 2026:
We replaced the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG with the Samsung Odyssey OLED G73SH S32HG732S in the upper mid-range category because the Samsung is cheaper. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the LG 32GS95UE-B with the XG32UCWMG.
Jul 09, 2026:
We added the new ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3 as the 'Best 32-Inch Monitor' to better represent the current market. With this, we renamed the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG to the 'Best Upper Mid-Range 32-Inch Monitor,' and we removed the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85, which has worse picture quality. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM with the ASUS ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV.
May 22, 2026:
We removed the Samsung Odyssey G70D S32DG70 as it doesn't fit into the scope of the article. Instead, we added the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 as the 'Best Upper Mid-Range 32-Inch Monitor,' and we renamed the Dell S3225QC to the 'Best Mid-Range 32-Inch Monitor.' We also added the Dell S3225QS to the Notable Mentions.
Apr 03, 2026:
We replaced the LG 32GR93U-B with the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 in the Notable Mentions.
Feb 12, 2026:
We replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM with the cheaper Dell S3225QC. We also replaced the LG 32GR93U-B with the Samsung Odyssey G70D S32DG70, as the LG is becoming harder to find. In the Notable Mentions, we removed the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED and added the PG32UCDM and the 32GR93U-B.
All Reviews
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best 32-inch monitors currently available in the United States, including the best 32-inch gaming monitors. They're adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. The rating is based on our review, feedback from visitors, and price. For example, two monitors may perform the same, but the cheaper one will be recommended. We also consider availability, as we don't recommend a monitor that's hard to find.
If you'd prefer to make your own decision, here's the list of all of our 32-inch monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.