A 32-inch monitor has many benefits, offering more screen space to multitask or for an immersive gaming experience compared to a smaller display. There are a ton of great options to choose from, but while they're growing in popularity, they still aren't as common as 27-inch displays. Luckily, they usually have a 4k or 1440p resolution, and premium models tend to have HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of modern graphics cards or gaming consoles. However, lower-end 32-inch models don't tend to be as good as smaller entry-level monitors.
When looking for a new monitor, it's important to consider your budget and what you need it for. If you want a gaming display, having a fast response time and low input lag help result in a responsive gaming experience, but most monitors have low input lag. On the other hand, wide viewing angles and high brightness are useful for work. There's no perfect solution for everyone, but understanding the available options is a good place to start.
We've bought and tested over 335 monitors, and below, you'll find our top picks for the best monitors available in a 32-inch size. If you're interested in other sizes, see our recommendations for the best 24-25-inch monitors, the best 27-inch monitors, and the best 34-49-inch monitors. If you want more info about monitor sizes, check out the best monitor sizes for gaming.
The best 32-inch monitor we've tested is the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80. It's a 4k, QD-OLED monitor that's fantastic for different uses. It's focused on gaming, as it has a 240Hz refresh rate and a near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion, also making it the best 32-inch gaming monitor. Its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth makes it a great choice for both PC gaming with modern graphics cards and for console gaming. It also delivers fantastic picture quality thanks to the near-infinite contrast ratio, and it displays deep blacks in dark rooms. Also, highlights pop in HDR, and colors are vivid for a remarkable HDR experience.
It has a few useful features, like Tizen OS built-in, so you can stream movies and shows without even needing your PC. It also has a USB hub with two USB-A ports to connect your devices, but if you want something with a USB-C port, the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED is also a great choice. However, it's harder to find than the Samsung at times. One thing to know is that OLEDs like these risk burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time, but using the monitor for varied usage reduces the risk of burn-in.
If you're worried about the burn-in on the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80, then check out the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85. It's worth getting when you can find it on sale for less than the G80SD. It's a 4k monitor like the G80SD, but without a QD-OLED panel, it doesn't display the same deep blacks and bright highlights. That's the trade-off for getting a lower-end monitor, but it has Mini LED backlighting that helps improve the picture quality in dark scenes. It doesn't have a near-instantaneous response time either, but the motion handling is still good enough for gaming, and it also has a 240Hz refresh rate. That said, if you don't want such a high refresh rate, you can also check out the similar Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75. It has a 165Hz refresh rate, but it can be harder to find than the Neo G8.
Since the Neo G8 doesn't risk burn-in like the Samsung, it's a great choice for office work. It delivers sharp text, gets bright enough to fight glare, and has fantastic reflection handling, which is great if you want to use it in a well-lit room. It even has an accurate sRGB mode, which helps if you want a display for casual content creation.
If the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 is still too much out of your price range, the Gigabyte M32U is a good mid-range alternative. Although it has a 4k resolution like the Samsung, leading to sharp and detailed images, there are a few trade-offs for getting it. It doesn't have Mini LED backlighting, and its local dimming is much worse, making blacks look gray in dark rooms. Highlights don't pop in HDR, either. It also has a lower refresh rate, but this only makes a difference if you have a gaming PC that can take advantage of such high refresh rates.
Besides that, it has features different from those of the Samsung, making it even more versatile for work purposes. For example, its KVM switch makes it easy to use the same keyboard and mouse with two different computers connected to the monitor. It also has a USB-C port that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, but with only 15W of power delivery, it isn't enough to charge your laptop while using it. If you want something that delivers more power over USB-C and also has a bigger USB hub, the Dell U3223QE is another great choice, but it doesn't have as many gaming features as the Gigabyte.
If you're on a more limited budget, you can save even more money by getting something with a 1440p resolution, and that's where the Samsung Odyssey G6/G65D S32BG65D is a good choice. It's a Best Buy-exclusive model that's also available as the older Samsung Odyssey G6 S32BG65 at other retailers, so you can get whichever you can find for cheaper as they perform the same. It's a bit different from the Gigabyte M32U because text isn't as sharp due to its lower resolution, and it doesn't have a USB-C port or KVM switch like the Gigabyte either, so it isn't as good for multitasking.
That said, it's still a versatile enough monitor because it has accurate colors, gets bright enough to fight glare, and has decent reflection handling. Plus, it has a higher 240Hz refresh rate than the Gigabyte, so it's a good choice for playing competitive games. The lower resolution also makes it easier for your graphics card to maintain those high frame rates if you're looking for the best 32-inch gaming monitor. Unfortunately, though, this monitor has narrow viewing angles, so it's a bad choice if you want to share your screen with someone else.
If you're looking for a 32-inch monitor on a budget, there are a few good options, but you'll have to sacrifice performance. A monitor like the LG 32GN650-B is decent overall, and you can also find it as the 32GN63T-B at different retailers, as both variants perform the same. Sadly, though, it's a step down from the Samsung Odyssey G6/G65D S32BG65D, as it doesn't get as bright and has worse motion handling with more smearing. It also has a lower refresh rate than the Samsung, but its 165Hz refresh rate is still good enough for most gamers.
It's pretty limited in features, as it doesn't have any USB ports, but that's what you have to expect for an entry-level display. Like the Samsung, it has a VA panel with narrow viewing angles, so the image washes out from the sides. However, the main advantage of this panel type is that it has a great contrast ratio and displays fairly deep blacks in dark rooms.
The LG 32GR93U-B is a mid-range and competing alternative to the Gigabyte M32U. It offers similar gaming performance and a faster response time. However, it has fewer features for office work, as it lacks a USB-C port and KVM switch.
See our reviewThe ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM is a premium 32-inch monitor that competes with the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80. It has a few extra features, like Dolby Vision and a KVM switch, but it costs more.
See our reviewThe LG 32GS95UE-B is a high-end monitor that's different from the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 because it has a Dual-Mode feature that switches it from a 4k, 240Hz display to a 1080p, 480Hz display. This is fantastic for competitive gaming, but it costs more than the Samsung and isn't worth getting for most people.
See our reviewThe LG 32GP850-B/32GP83B-B is a lower mid-range monitor that's worth considering over the Samsung Odyssey G6/G65D S32BG65D if you prefer a lower refresh rate. It also has wider viewing angles, which is useful for office work, but it costs more.
See our reviewWe replaced the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 with the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85, which is easier to find. We also replaced the LG 32GP850-B/32GP83B-B with the Samsung Odyssey G6/G65D S32BG65D because it's cheaper. Lastly, we removed the Dell Alienware AW3225QF from the Notable Mentions and added the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM and LG 32GS95UE-B to better represent the current market.
Sep 20, 2024: We replaced the Dell Alienware AW3225QF with the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 for consistency with other recommendations and renamed it the 'Best 32-Inch Monitor.' We also replaced the Samsung Odyssey Neo G87 S32BG85 with the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 and renamed it the 'Best Upper Mid-Range Monitor' to match its market position. Lastly, we replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM with the AW3225QF in the Notable Mentions to better represent the current market.
Jul 03, 2024: Removed the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 from Notable Mentions as it's now mentioned in the text of the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85. Added the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM to the Notable Mentions.
May 17, 2024: Added the Dell Alienware AW3225QF as the 'Best 32-Inch Gaming Monitor' to reflect the current market and what people are searching for. Replaced the Dell U3223QE with the Dell S3221QS in the Notable Mentions to reflect changes in the text of the recommendation.
Mar 25, 2024: Moved the LG 32GR93U-B to Notable Mentions because it's similar in price to the Gigabyte M32U and has fewer features. Replaced the Samsung Odyssey G7/G70B S32BG70 with the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 in Notable Mentions because the Neo G7 is better overall. Removed the Dell Alienware AW3225QF from Notable Mentions, as it's mentioned as an alternative in the text of the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85.
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best monitors currently available with a 32-inch screen, including the best 32-inch gaming monitors. They are adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. Rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors.
If you would prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all of our 32-inch monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.