Our Verdict
The Zik 2.0 are good everyday headphones. They have enough features to handle most test cases and environments.
- Great sturdy and durable design.
- Feature packed.
- Great customization options thanks to The Parrot Zik app.
- Sensitive touch controls.
- Poor treble audio reproduction
Decent for neutral listening. They deliver a customizable audio profile but sound too closed for pure and isolated neutral listening.
Good for commuting. The Zik 2.0 are comfortable and have a decent control scheme. They're well-built and not too cumbersome. Additionally, the noise canceling works well in loud environments and will substantially reduce the ambient noise of a busy commute or noisy flight.
Above-average for sports use. They're comfortable, stable and wireless, with a good control scheme. However, they’re a bit too bulky for strenuous exercise.
Above-average for office use. They don leak much and cancel a great deal of ambient noise and chatter in a busy office.
Changelog
- Updated Nov 21, 2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.1.
- Updated Nov 21, 2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.
- Updated Jun 05, 2019: We've updated the Build Quality section of the review to better reflect the defect with the pads.
- Updated Feb 16, 2018: Converted to Test Bench 1.2.
Check Price
Popular Headphones Comparisons
The Parrot Zik 3.0 are slightly better than the Parrot Zik 2.0, but not by much. The Zik 3.0 have a slightly more durable design with earcup pads that will last longer than on the Zik 2.0. The Zik 3.0 are a bit more customizable and have fewer bugs in their software than the Zik 2.0. The 2.0, on the other hand, have a slightly stronger isolation profile that isn't as adaptive but cancels a bit more noise overall.
The Parrot Zik 2.0/Zik 2.0 Wireless are much better wireless headphones than the Skullcandy Hesh 2. The Zik have a lot more customizable features than the Hesh 2. They're also better built and a bit more comfortable than the Hesh 2. Since they're noise cancelling headphones, they do much better in noisy conditions. On the other hand, the Skullcandys are much lighter and have an easier-to-use control scheme. They also have a longer battery life than the Parrot, and since they're cheaper, they might be a better value for some.
The Bose QuietComfort 35/QC35 Wireless 2016 are a better noise canceling headset than the Parrot Zik 2/Zik 2.0 Wireless. The Parrot are better-built and look a bit more premium. They also have a lot more customization options via their app and a stronger isolation performance since they do not leak as much. However, the Bose are more comfortable and have a better-balanced default sound quality than the Parrot. They also have a much longer battery life which makes them more suitable for long trips and traveling. They're slightly easier to use than the touch-sensitive control scheme of the Parrot.
If you prefer in-ear headphones that are more compact to carry around, then go for the Jaybird X3, but if you're looking for noise cancelling over-ears, the Parrot Zik 2.0 are a good option. The Parrot Zik are well-built over-ears with great noise cancellation that make them a suitable choice for commute and travel. They also have a lot more features and customization options than the Jaybird X3. However, the Jaybird X3 are a lot more portable. They're also a better choice for sports, since they have a breathable and stable in-ear design.
Our How We Test Headphones article takes you behind the scenes in our lab. You'll learn how we choose and purchase products and dive into the details of our review philosophy, from testing and scoring to writing and editing.
You can also discover how we produce recommendations like this one so that you can find the best headphones (or earbuds!) for your needs.
Test Results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
