The 6 Best 34 Inch + Monitors - Fall 2020
Reviews

If you need even more screen real estate for multitasking, then check out the Dell U4919DW. It looks very much like the Dell U3818DW, but it has a 32:9 aspect ratio, which is the same as two 16:9 monitors placed side-by-side. It uses an IPS panel with decent viewing angles and has a slightly curved screen. It gets brighter and has better reflection handling, so you should be able to use it in a fairly bright room. Its response time is significantly faster, making it a good option for casual gaming. There's no VRR support, though, and the refresh rate is limited to 60Hz. It has the same Picture-by-Picture mode, USB-C port, and five USB 3.0 ports. Sadly, there's no swivel adjustment due to the sheer size of the monitor.

For most people, the U3818DW is big enough and has better ergonomics, allowing you to adjust the monitor more easily to your optimal viewing position. However, if you need the extra screen space, the U4919DW is a very good alternative.

If you like the Dell U3818DW but would rather have a native 4k resolution and still want a large screen, get the LG 43UD79-B. It's a decent 4k monitor that can perform well in an office environment where multitasking is necessary. Thanks to its ample screen real estate, you can open lots of applications and documents at once. Also, when you maximize the windows, you'll be able to see every little detail of your work on this monitor. Unfortunately, it doesn't support HDR, and its ergonomics aren't great, so you might want to consider VESA-mounting it.

For most people, the Dell will do the job. However, for a true 4k monitor that'll let you display every detail of your work, the LG is a great choice.

If you want a super ultrawide monitor that spans nearly your entire field of view, then check out the Samsung C49RG9/CRG9. It has the same pixel density as the Acer Nitro XV340CK, but its 32:9 aspect ratio is much wider and is equivalent to two 16:9 monitors placed side-by-side. It has a VA panel with a much higher contrast ratio, making it a better choice for gaming in the dark. It has slower response time and a lower refresh rate of 120Hz, but the difference is pretty small and shouldn't be noticeable for most. It delivers a significantly better HDR experience, though, as it can display a wide color gamut and gets bright enough to make highlights stand out.

Overall, if you want better motion handling, go with the Acer. However, if you want a super ultrawide monitor for a more immersive gaming experience, then go with the Samsung.

If you find the Acer Nitro XV340CK too expensive, then take a look at the LG 34UC79G-B. It has the same 34 inch screen size and 21:9 aspect ratio, but a lower 1080p resolution that might disappoint some. It has an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, and it also has a 144Hz refresh rate and native FreeSync support. Unfortunately, it has poor ergonomics and doesn't support HDR, although it's somewhat expected of a monitor in this price range.

For most people, the Acer is a better choice due to its superior ergonomics and better motion handling. However, if your budget is tight, the LG is a good alternative.