Get insider access
Preferred store
Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
We've recently released Test Bench 2.0 for Monitors! Read our new VRR Flicker R&D Article and Pursuit Photo R&D Article to learn more.

MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD Monitor Review

Tested using Methodology v2.0
Review updated May 21, 2024 at 10:05 am
MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD Picture
7.2
PC Gaming
6.6
Console Gaming
7.7
Office
7.2
Editing
7.2
Brightness
7.6
Response Time
5.4
HDR Picture
7.2
SDR Picture
7.7
Color Accuracy

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD is a 1440p gaming monitor with a 165Hz refresh rate. As a part of the MSI MAG monitor lineup, it sits alongside the MSI Optix MG274QRF, which is a similar monitor but doesn't have a quantum dot layer like this monitor. It has features you'd expect to find in a gaming monitor, like G-SYNC compatibility and RGB backlighting, and it has a Console Mode that downscales 4k signals from consoles. It also has a USB hub that includes two USB-A ports and a USB-C slot for you to connect your devices.

Our Verdict

7.2 PC Gaming

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD is decent for PC gaming. It has a 165Hz refresh rate with native FreeSync support and G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing. It has low input lag for a responsive feel and a fast enough response time for sharp motion, but there's more inverse ghosting at lower refresh rates. Unfortunately, it has limited picture quality as blacks look gray, and it fails to make highlights stand out in HDR.

Pros
  • 165Hz refresh rate and VRR support.
  • Fast response time at high refresh rates.
  • Extremely low input lag.
Cons
  • Low contrast ratio.
  • More blur at 60Hz.
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.
6.6 Console Gaming

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD 27 is okay for console gaming. Although it lacks HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S, there aren't any compatibility issues with either console. It has low input lag for a responsive feel, and it has a fast response time at 120Hz, but there's more blur at 60Hz. Sadly, it's a poor choice for playing HDR games as it has a low contrast ratio, and it lacks a local dimming feature to further improve it.

Pros
  • Fast response time at high refresh rates.
  • Extremely low input lag.
Cons
  • Low contrast ratio.
  • More blur at 60Hz.
  • Can't take full advantage of consoles.
7.7 Office

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD is good for office use. It has a large, high-resolution screen that delivers clear text. The ergonomics are fantastic, and it has wide viewing angles, making it easy to share your screen with someone else. It also gets bright enough to combat glare and has decent reflection handling in well-lit rooms.

Pros
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Fantastic ergonomics.
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
Cons
  • Colors are oversaturated.
7.2 Editing

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD is decent for content creators. It displays a wide range of colors, but they look oversaturated, and you need to get it calibrated for the best accuracy. It also has limited picture quality in HDR with a low contrast ratio and brightness. On the plus side, it has wide viewing angles and great ergonomics, allowing you to easily share your screen with a client or coworker.

Pros
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Fantastic ergonomics.
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
Cons
  • Colors are oversaturated.
  • Low contrast ratio.
7.2 Brightness

The MSI MAG274QRF-QD has decent brightness. It gets bright enough to fight glare in most well-lit rooms, but highlights don't pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
Cons
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.
7.6 Response Time

The MSI MAG274QRF-QD has a good response time. Motion looks best at high refresh rates, but there's more inverse ghosting and blur at lower refresh rates.

Pros
  • Fast response time at high refresh rates.
Cons
  • More blur at 60Hz.
5.4 HDR Picture

The MSI MAG274QRF-QD has limited HDR picture quality. With low contrast and no local dimming feature, blacks look gray in the dark, and most colors don't look vivid either.

Pros
Cons
  • Low contrast ratio.
  • No local dimming.
7.2 SDR Picture

The MSI MAG274QRF-QD has decent SDR picture quality. Its main advantage is that it displays a wide range of colors, but it has a low contrast ratio making blacks look gray in dark rooms.

Pros
  • Displays wide range of colors.
Cons
  • Low contrast ratio.
7.7 Color Accuracy

The MSI MAG274QRF-QD has good color accuracy, but you need to calibrate it for the best accuracy, as there are issues before calibration.

Pros
  • Good gray uniformity.
Cons
  • Colors are oversaturated.
  • 7.2 PC Gaming
  • 6.6 Console Gaming
  • 7.7 Office
  • 7.2 Editing

Performance Usages

  • 7.2 Brightness
  • 7.6 Response Time
  • 5.4 HDR Picture
  • 7.2 SDR Picture
  • 7.7 Color Accuracy
  1. Updated May 21, 2024: Updated text throughout the review according to Test Bench 2.0, mainly in the Verdict and Motion sections.
  2. Updated May 16, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.0. This includes new tests for VRR Motion Performance, Refresh Rate Compliance, Cumulative Absolute Deviation (CAD), and VRR Flicker. You can read the full changelog here.
  3. Updated Apr 18, 2023: Confirmed that 1440p works on this monitor with the PS5.
  4. Updated May 02, 2022: We tested the monitor with the PS5's new variable refresh rate feature and confirmed that it's not compatible, since the PS5 only supports HDMI Forum VRR.
  5. Updated Apr 08, 2022: Updated to Test Bench 1.2, resulting in changes to the results and scores with the Response Time and Input Lag. Added tests for Console Compatibility and macOS compatibility and made minor changes to other tests, which you can see in our Changelog.
  6. Updated Nov 18, 2021: Updated the monitor to the latest firmware, and retested the accuracy out of the box with the new sRGB mode.
  7. Updated Feb 10, 2021: Review published.
  8. Updated Feb 05, 2021: Early access published.
  9. Updated Feb 02, 2021: Our testers have started testing this product.
  10. Updated Jan 28, 2021: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.
  11. Updated Jan 17, 2021: We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We tested the 27-inch MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD 27, which is only available in this size. The MSI Optix MAG274QRF is also available, which has many of the same features, but doesn't have a quantum dot layer like the MAG274QRF-QD, so it performs differently. The results of this review are only valid for the MAG274QRF-QD.

Model Size Resolution Refresh Rate Quantum Dot
MAG274QRF-QD 27" 1440p 165Hz Yes
MAG274QRF  27" 1440p 165Hz No

Our unit was manufactured in October 2020, and you can see our label here.

Compared To Other Monitors

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD is a decent PC gaming monitor that has features you'd expect to find in a gaming monitor, like VRR support, low input lag, and a fast response time. Its quantum dot layer is unique for a monitor in this price range, but it also oversaturates colors. While it's a good choice for its price range, there's nothing that really stands out versus the competition, and you can get better value for gaming with a monitor like the Dell G2724D.

Also, see our recommendations for the best 1440p monitors, the best monitors for PS5/PS5 Pro, and the best gaming monitors.

LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B are similar 1440p, 27-inch monitors, but there are a few differences. The MSI has a few extra features for office use, like an ergonomic stand and a USB-C input that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode. However, the colors look oversaturated, and the color accuracy is much better on the LG. The LG is also slightly better for gaming because it supports DP 1.4 bandwidth, allowing you to reach a higher refresh rate, and the motion handling is a bit better with lower frame rate signals.

MSI G274QPF-QD

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the MSI G274QPF-QD are very similar 27-inch gaming monitors. However, the MAG274QRF-QD is the better monitor for most people, as it has better black uniformity, so deep blacks appear less cloudy in a dark room, and it also has more vibrant HDR colors. Additionally, the MAG274QRF-QD has a faster response time, so fast-moving images look sharper.

LG 27GR83Q-B

The LG 27GR83Q-B and the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD are both low-cost 1440p gaming monitors, but there are some differences. The main difference is that the LG has a higher 240Hz refresh rate and better motion handling. The LG also supports HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of modern graphics cards and gaming consoles. While the LG is the better choice in well-lit rooms, the MSI has a few extra office-use features, like better ergonomics and a KVM switch.

ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A

Overall, the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD performs better than the ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A. The MSI has a much faster response time to deliver a clearer image in fast-moving scenes. It has a much wider color gamut for HDR due to its quantum dot layer; however, it doesn't get as bright as the ASUS to bring out highlights in HDR content. The MSI has more USB ports, including a USB-C that supports DisplayPort and 15W charging.

Gigabyte M27Q X

The Gigabyte M27Q X is a bit better than the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD. The Gigabyte has a higher native refresh rate, resulting in slightly clearer motion overall. The Gigabyte is also more accurate out of the box and has better connectivity, with a high-bandwidth USB-C and a built-in keyboard, video, and mouse switch.

ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ

The ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ performs very similarly to the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD. As far as gaming goes, you can't really go wrong with either one. The MSI has a slightly faster response time at the max refresh rate, while the ASUS has a slightly faster response time at 60Hz and a marginally higher refresh rate, but really, these are minor differences. While the MSI has a wider color gamut thanks to its use of quantum dot technology, in practice, colors can look oversaturated. The ASUS has a couple of other things that may make it preferable to some. It has wider viewing angles, so the image stays accurate from the sides, and it has much better out-of-the-box color accuracy, so you may not need to calibrate it to get the most out of your monitor. All in all, though, these are both excellent gaming monitors.

Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx

The Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx and the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD are very similar gaming-wise. The main differences are that the MSI has a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alt Mode and a better color gamut in HDR.

Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0)

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are two decent gaming monitors with a 1440p resolution. They each have fast response time, low input lag, FreeSync support, and G-SYNC compatibility. The MSI has much better ergonomics, making it easy to place the screen how you like. However, the Gigabyte has much better out-of-the-box accuracy, so colors don't look oversaturated like they do on the MSI. It also has Picture-by-Picture/Picture-in-Picture modes, allowing you to display images from two sources at once.

ASUS TUF VG27AQ

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are two gaming monitors; they each have a 1440p resolution and a 165Hz refresh rate. Motion looks smoother on the MSI thanks to its quick response time, especially at 60Hz. However, the ASUS has a BFI feature that works at a wider refresh rate range than the MSI, and it can also be used when VRR is enabled, which the MSI can't do.

Gigabyte G27Q

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD is better than the Gigabyte G27Q for most uses. The MSI has a slightly higher refresh rate and faster response time to deliver smoother motion. It also has better ergonomics because it allows for swivel and pivot adjustments, and its USB hub includes a USB-C port that supports DisplayPort and 15W charging. It has a wider color gamut than the Gigabyte but doesn't get as bright to bring out highlights in HDR content.

Gigabyte M27Q P

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the Gigabyte M27Q P are both great gaming monitors. They have similar specs with a 1440p resolution and 27-inch screen size, and they each have a 165Hz native refresh rate, but you can overclock the Gigabyte to 170Hz. In terms of its gaming performance, the MSI has a faster response time at its max refresh rate, but the motion handling is the same between the two at lower refresh rates. The MSI also has a lower input lag at 60Hz. The Gigabyte has a few extra features, like a KVM switch, that make it useful for productivity, but the MSI has better ergonomics.

Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50 are both good gaming monitors. They both have a 165Hz refresh rate, native FreeSync VRR support, a 1440p resolution, and fantastic motion handling. There are a few differences in picture quality, though; the MSI displays a wider color gamut in HDR and SDR, but that's because it over-saturates the colors, meaning some people may prefer the Samsung. The Samsung also gets brighter and has better reflection handling, so it's a better choice for well-lit rooms. On the other hand, the MSI has a better selection of inputs, such as a USB-C input and two USB inputs that you can connect your keyboard and mouse to.

Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70

The Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70 and the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD are different types of monitors. The Samsung is a 4k monitor with HDMI 2.1 inputs, so it's a better choice for console gaming, while the MSI has a 1440p resolution and a slightly higher 165Hz refresh rate. Motion handling is fantastic on both, but the MSI has a slightly faster response time at 60Hz. The MSI has a few more office features like better ergonomics and a USB-C input, but the Samsung delivers clearer text thanks to its higher resolution. The MSI is also a better choice for use in well-lit rooms because it gets brighter.

LG 27GL850-B/27GL83A-B

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD is a better gaming monitor than the LG 27GL850-B/27GL83A-B. They have similar features with a 1440p resolution, FreeSync support, G-SYNC compatibility, and a very quick response time. The MSI has a black frame insertion feature, which the LG doesn't, but it has a narrow flicker range and can't be used with VRR enabled. The MSI also has much better ergonomics, including a swivel adjustment, which the LG doesn't have.

Dell Alienware AW2723DF

The Dell Alienware AW2723DF is slightly better for gaming than the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD. The main difference is that the Dell has a much higher 280Hz max refresh rate compared to 165Hz on the MSI, allowing you to play games at a higher frame rate. On the other hand, the MSI is better if you game in a bright room because it has much better reflection handling.

Dell S2721DGF

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the Dell S2721DGF are both great monitors with similar gaming features. They're both 1440p monitors with a 165Hz refresh rate and outstanding response time. The MSI has a BFI feature, which the Dell doesn't, but it only works within a narrow frequency range. The MSI also has a USB-C input, which supports DisplayPort Alt Mode. On the other hand, the Dell is a better choice if you want to use it in a well-lit room because it has much better reflection handling. It also has a local dimming feature, but it performs terribly.

Acer Predator XB273U GXbmiipruzx

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the Acer Predator XB273U GXbmiipruzx are similar monitors, but the Acer has more to recommend. They both have exceptional color gamuts, but the MSI lacks an sRGB setting, so colors appear oversaturated. The Acer also has a higher refresh rate, gets brighter in SDR and HDR, and has better accuracy out of the box.

MSI Optix G273QF

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD is better for most uses than the MSI Optix G273QF, but they have similar gaming performance. They both have an incredible response time, very low input lag, and a 165Hz refresh rate for gaming. The MAG274QRF-QD has much better ergonomics, allowing you to easily adjust the screen. It also supports HDR10, which the G273QF doesn't, and it has many more features, such as a Console Mode that's designed for PS5 compatibility.

Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q

The Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q and the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD are very similar overall. The MSI performs better because it has a faster response time. The Gigabyte has a Picture-in-Picture mode, but on the other hand, the MSI has a USB-C port that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode.

MSI Optix G273

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD is a much better monitor than the MSI Optix G273. The MAG274QRF-QD delivers a much smoother gaming experience with a faster response time, resulting in less motion blur behind fast-moving objects. The MAG274QRF-QD also has better compatibility with consoles, as it can display a 1440p or downscaled 4k signal, so your favorite games look sharper and more detailed. Finally, the MAG274QRF-QD supports HDR, whereas the G273 is limited to SDR.

Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X are both excellent gaming monitors. They each have an IPS panel with a 1440p resolution, but the main difference is that the Gigabyte has a 240Hz refresh rate and the MSI has 165Hz. They have quick response times, native FreeSync support, and low input lag for gaming. The MSI uses a traditional RGB subpixel layout, whereas the Gigabyte uses BGR, which not all programs may use and could result in blurry text. However, we don't expect this to be an issue for most people.

LG 27GN850-B/27GN880-B

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD is a bit better for most uses than the LG 27GN850-B/27GN880-B, but they have many of the same features. They both have outstanding response time and low input lag for gaming, but the MSI has a slightly higher 165Hz refresh rate. It also has a BFI feature, but it only works within a narrow range. However, the LG has better out-of-the-box accuracy, and colors don't look as over-saturated as the MSI, so you may not need to get it calibrated to enjoy it to the fullest.

MSI Optix MAG161V

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the MSI Optix MAG161V are very different monitors that target different uses, so they're not really directly comparable. The MAG161V is a portable monitor with a 16-inch 1080p screen, designed for productivity on the go. The MAG274QRF-QD is a desktop gaming monitor with a 27-inch 1440p screen and delivers a much better experience overall, but it's not portable.

ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPE

The ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPE and the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD are very different monitors, each with strengths and weaknesses. The ASUS is designed for portability, so it has a smaller screen, much worse ergonomics, and slightly worse viewing angles. The MSI is more feature-rich, as it supports HDR and has an optional black frame insertion feature.

Gigabyte M32Q

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the Gigabyte M32Q offer very similar performance overall. The biggest difference between them is in their design. If you prefer a larger screen, go with the Gigabyte, but if ergonomics are more important to you and you don't plan on VESA mounting the monitor, the MSI might be the better choice.

ASUS ProArt PA148CTV

The ASUS ProArt PA148CTV and the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD are very different products with different intended uses, so the results aren't really comparable. The MSI is a desktop fixed gaming monitor with a high refresh rate and advanced gaming features, while the ASUS is a simple portable monitor designed for extra productivity on the go.

Razer Raptor 27 165Hz

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the Razer Raptor 27 165Hz are great 1440p monitors with a 165Hz resolution. The MSI displays a wider color gamut in SDR and HDR, but that's because it over-saturates colors. The MSI also has a much quicker response time at 60Hz, delivering smoother motion for console gamers, and has better ergonomics. The Razer has better reflection handling and gets slightly brighter, so it's a better choice for well-lit rooms. Even though the MSI has Adaptive Sync technology and the Razer has native FreeSync, both FreeSync and G-SYNC VRR work on either monitor.

ViewSonic VG1655

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the ViewSonic VG1655 are two different monitors. The MSI is a standard monitor with a 1440p resolution and 165Hz refresh rate. It has more gaming features than the ViewSonic, like VRR support, a very quick response time, and low input lag. Since it's a regular desktop monitor, it also has a stand with much better ergonomics. The ViewSonic is a portable monitor with a 1080p resolution, but it has much better text clarity with its smaller screen.

Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T

The Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T and the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD are both gaming monitors that are different in a few ways. The Samsung uses a VA panel and is available in a 27-inch or 32-inch size, while the MSI uses an IPS panel and is only available in a 27-inch. If you want better dark room performance, go with the Samsung because it can produce much deeper blacks. It has a higher refresh rate as well. The MSI isn't as good for dark rooms due to its IPS panel's mediocre contrast, but it provides wider viewing angles and has USB-C input.

+ Show more

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
Design
Style
Curved
No
Curve Radius
Not Curved

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD is stylish with a square-based stand that doesn't take up too much space. The back has a sleek-looking design that won't stick out in an office environment, and it has RGB lighting.

Design
Accelerated Longevity Test
Uniformity Pictures N/A
8.0
Design
Build Quality

The build quality is great. It's made out of solid plastic, and there aren't any obvious gaps in the construction. The monitor feels stable on the stand, and there's minimal wobble.

9.0
Design
Ergonomics
Min Height To Top Of Panel
16.7" (42.5 cm)
Height Adjustment
3.9" (10.0 cm)
Tilt Range
-20° to 5°
Rotate Portrait/Landscape
Yes, Both Ways
Swivel Range
-75° to 75°
Wall Mount
VESA 100x100

The ergonomics are fantastic. The monitor offers all kinds of adjustments, so you can easily place it in an ideal position. The back panel is a mix of matte and glossy plastic, and there's a strip of RGB lighting above the glossy plastic. Lastly, there's a cutout in the stand for cable management.

Design
Stand
Base Width
11.8" (30.0 cm)
Base Depth
8.3" (21.0 cm)
Thickness (With Display)
7.8" (19.7 cm)
Weight (With Display)
13.4 lbs (6.1 kg)

The stand supports the monitor well, and there isn't much wobble.

Design
Display
Size
27"
Housing Width
23.8" (60.5 cm)
Housing Height
14.6" (37.0 cm)
Thickness (Without Stand)
1.8" (4.6 cm)
Weight (Without Stand)
7.7 lbs (3.5 kg)
Borders Size (Bezels)
0.3" (0.8 cm)
Design
Controls

A joystick is on the back right side so you can control the on-screen menu. There's a function button on the left side that you can assign a macro to through the OSD.

Design
In The Box
Power Supply
External Brick

  • DisplayPort cable
  • HDMI cable
  • USB-B upstream cable
  • Power supply and cable
  • VESA screw extenders
  • User manuals

Picture Quality
6.3
Picture Quality
Contrast
Native Contrast
1,195 : 1
Contrast With Local Dimming
N/A

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD 27 has a mediocre contrast ratio. This means blacks look gray in dark rooms, and there's no local dimming feature to improve it.

0
Picture Quality
Local Dimming
Local Dimming
No
Backlight
Edge

This monitor has no local dimming feature. We still film these videos on the monitor so you can compare the backlight performance with a monitor that has local dimming.

8.0
Picture Quality
SDR Brightness
Real Scene
347 cd/m²
Peak 2% Window
372 cd/m²
Peak 10% Window
372 cd/m²
Peak 25% Window
372 cd/m²
Peak 50% Window
372 cd/m²
Peak 100% Window
372 cd/m²
Sustained 2% Window
372 cd/m²
Sustained 10% Window
372 cd/m²
Sustained 25% Window
372 cd/m²
Sustained 50% Window
372 cd/m²
Sustained 100% Window
372 cd/m²
Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
0.000
Minimum Brightness
65 cd/m²

This monitor has great SDR brightness. It gets bright enough to combat glare, and it maintains its brightness extremely consistent across different content. These measurements are from after calibration in the 'User' Picture Mode. The minimum brightness is a bit high, so it's not ideal if you plan on using it in a completely dark room and are sensitive to light.

6.6
Picture Quality
HDR Brightness
VESA DisplayHDR Certification
No Certification
Real Scene
367 cd/m²
Peak 2% Window
389 cd/m²
Peak 10% Window
390 cd/m²
Peak 25% Window
390 cd/m²
Peak 50% Window
390 cd/m²
Peak 100% Window
390 cd/m²
Sustained 2% Window
388 cd/m²
Sustained 10% Window
389 cd/m²
Sustained 25% Window
389 cd/m²
Sustained 50% Window
389 cd/m²
Sustained 100% Window
389 cd/m²
Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
0.000

The HDR brightness is alright, but small highlights don't pop against the rest of the image. It doesn't track the EOTF very well either, as most scenes are brighter than intended, but because it has a sharp cut-off at the peak brightness, it lets highlights get the brightest they could. These measurements are with the HDR setting enabled; there's no brightness setting when it's enabled.

7.7
Picture Quality
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Left
30°
Color Washout From Right
34°
Color Shift From Left
55°
Color Shift From Right
64°
Brightness Loss From Left
32°
Brightness Loss From Right
37°
Black Level Raise From Left
70°
Black Level Raise From Right
70°
Gamma Shift From Left
47°
Gamma Shift From Right
50°

This monitor has a good horizontal viewing angle. The colors remain consistent from wide angles, so it's good for sharing your screen with others around you.

6.9
Picture Quality
Vertical Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Below
29°
Color Washout From Above
28°
Color Shift From Below
48°
Color Shift From Above
41°
Brightness Loss From Below
33°
Brightness Loss From Above
33°
Black Level Raise From Below
70°
Black Level Raise From Above
70°
Gamma Shift From Below
31°
Gamma Shift From Above
30°

The vertical viewing angle is okay. You may notice some color washout if you place the monitor above eye level, but the image remains consistent for the most part.

7.6
Picture Quality
Gray Uniformity
50% Std. Dev.
4.282%
50% DSE
0.146%

The gray uniformity is great. The edges of the screen are noticeably darker, but there's minimal dirty screen effect in the center.

6.7
Picture Quality
Black Uniformity
Native Std. Dev.
1.541%
Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
N/A

The black uniformity is alright. The entire screen looks gray due to the low contrast ratio, and there's backlight bleed along the top and bottom edges.

7.1
Picture Quality
Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
Picture Mode
Srgb
sRGB Gamut Area xy
96.8%
White Balance dE (Avg.)
6.63
Color Temperature (Avg.)
7,217 K
Gamma (Avg.)
2.02
Color dE (Avg.)
4.41
Contrast Setting
N/A
RGB Settings
Normal
Gamma Setting
No Gamma Setting
Brightness Setting
70
Measured Brightness
327 cd/m²
Brightness Locked
No

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD 27 has decent accuracy before calibration in the sRGB mode. However, there are still inaccurate colors, as the white balance is way off, and the color temperature is cold, giving the image a blue tint. Gamma doesn't follow the sRGB target curve at all, as dark scenes are a bit too dark, and bright scenes are too bright. If you want a similar monitor with better accuracy before calibration, check out the Gigabyte M27Q X instead.

Unlike most monitors, using the sRGB mode doesn't lock down most picture settings. However, changing any picture setting while in the sRGB stops the monitor from effectively clamping the color gamut to the sRGB color space, resulting in an oversaturated image, for which you can see the results here.

9.8
Picture Quality
Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
Picture Mode
User
sRGB Gamut Area xy
100.5%
White Balance dE (Avg.)
0.62
Color Temperature (Avg.)
6,434 K
Gamma (Avg.)
2.19
Color dE (Avg.)
0.37
Contrast Setting
70
RGB Settings
100-90-92
Gamma Setting
No Gamma Setting
Brightness Setting
11
Measured Brightness
100 cd/m²
ICC Profile
Download

The accuracy after calibration is fantastic. It fixes most issues with the white balance, color temperature, and color accuracy.

9.9
Picture Quality
SDR Color Gamut
sRGB Coverage xy
99.5%
sRGB Picture Mode
User
Adobe RGB Coverage xy
100.0%
Adobe RGB Picture Mode
User

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD has an exceptional SDR color gamut. It has perfect coverage of both the commonly used sRGB color space and the Adobe RGB color space used in photo editing. However, most colors appear oversaturated in Adobe RGB because it covers more than the required color space.

9.2
Picture Quality
HDR Color Gamut
Wide Color Gamut
Yes
DCI-P3 Coverage xy
96.7%
DCI-P3 Picture Mode
User
Rec. 2020 Coverage xy
81.3%
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
User

The HDR color gamut is fantastic. It has outstanding coverage of the DCI-P3 color space used in most HDR content. It also has great coverage of the wider Rec. 2020 color space.

7.6
Picture Quality
HDR Color Volume
1,000 cd/m² DCI-P3 Coverage ICtCp
65.2%
DCI-P3 Picture Mode
User
10,000 cd/m² Rec. 2020 Coverage ICtCp
31.6%
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
User

The HDR color volume is good. While it displays a wide range of colors, it fails to make most of them look very vivid, and it also struggles with really dark colors.

7.5
Picture Quality
Text Clarity
Pixel Type
IPS
Subpixel Layout
RGB

The text clarity is good. Using ClearType On (top photo) improves the appearance of diagonal lines, as seen on the letters R, N, G, and S.

7.4
Picture Quality
Reflections
Screen Finish
Matte
Total Reflections
5.4%
Indirect Reflections
3.0%
Calculated Direct Reflections
2.4%

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD has decent reflection handling. It performs well with a bit of light on it, but the reflections may become too distracting if there are strong light sources directly on it.

9.8
Picture Quality
Gradient
Color Depth
10 Bit

The gradient handling is exceptional. There's almost no visible banding in real content.

Motion
7.5
Motion
Refresh Rate
Native Refresh Rate
165 Hz
Max Refresh Rate
165 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over DP
165 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
144 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over DP @ 10-bit
120 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI @ 10-Bit
60 Hz

Due to bandwidth limitations, you can only achieve the monitor's max refresh rate with an 8-bit signal over DisplayPort. However, if you want a 1440p gaming monitor with a higher refresh rate, check out the Acer Predator XB273U GXbmiipruzx instead.

Motion
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
Variable Refresh Rate
Yes
FreeSync
Yes
G-SYNC
Compatible (NVIDIA Certified)
VRR Maximum
165 Hz
VRR Minimum
< 20 Hz
VRR Supported Connectors
DisplayPort, HDMI

NVIDIAVRR MinVRR Max
DisplayPort<20Hz165Hz
HDMIN/AN/A

AMDVRR MinVRR Max
DisplayPort<20Hz165Hz
HDMI<20Hz144Hz

7.7
Motion
VRR Motion Performance
Recommended VRR OD Setting
Fast
Variable Overdrive Advertised
No
Avg. CAD
176
Best CAD
164
Worst CAD
205

Refresh RateCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
164HeatmapChartPhoto
144HeatmapChartPhoto
120HeatmapChartPhoto
100HeatmapChartPhoto
80HeatmapChartPhoto
60HeatmapChartPhoto

This monitor has good motion handling across its VRR range without too much blur. The 'Fast' Response Time overdrive setting has the lowest CAD at any refresh rate, but it introduces inverse ghosting at lower refresh rates. If that bothers you, the 'Normal' setting is more consistent, but there's more blur, especially at high refresh rates. The 'Fastest' overdrive has such a high CAD that it passes the limits of the charts. You can see an alternative chart here.

7.5
Motion
Refresh Rate Compliance
Compliance @ Max Hz
50%
Compliance @ 120 FPS
62%
Compliance @ 60 FPS
74%

The refresh rate compliance is good. While its response time isn't fast enough to make full color transitions before the monitor draws the next frame at the max refresh rate, it's better at lower refresh rates.

7.6
Motion
CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
OD Transition Max Refresh Rate
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Fast
Avg. CAD
166
Best 10% CAD
106
Worst 10% CAD
275

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
NormalHeatmapChartPhoto
FastHeatmapChartPhoto
FastestHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at the max refresh rate of 165Hz is good. There's a bit of blur, but it isn't too distracting. The 'Fast' overdrive setting has the fastest total response time out of the overdrive settings and less overshoot than 'Fastest.'

Motion
Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Fast
First Response Time
6.3 ms
Total Response Time
6.3 ms
RGB Overshoot
0 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
11.4 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
11.4 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
0 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
NormalHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FastHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FastestHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

7.7
Motion
CAD @ 120Hz
OD Transition 120Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Fast
Avg. CAD
160
Best 10% CAD
99
Worst 10% CAD
257

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
NormalHeatmapChartPhoto
FastHeatmapChartPhoto
FastestHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at 120Hz is good. The recommended overdrive setting of 'Fast' has more inverse ghosting than at its max refresh rate, but it's hardly noticeable, and using the 'Normal' setting instead results in more blur.

Motion
Response Time @ 120Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Fast
First Response Time
5.5 ms
Total Response Time
7.8 ms
RGB Overshoot
3 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
9.3 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
11.4 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
10 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
NormalHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FastHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FastestHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

7.3
Motion
CAD @ 60Hz
OD Transition 60Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Normal
Avg. CAD
197
Best 10% CAD
109
Worst 10% CAD
296

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
NormalHeatmapChartPhoto
FastHeatmapChartPhoto
FastestHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at 60Hz is decent. There's noticeable blur, and unlike at higher refresh rates, the recommended overdrive setting is 'Normal' because 'Fast' has noticeable inverse ghosting. This means you may have to change the setting if you change games.

Motion
Response Time @ 60Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Normal
First Response Time
9.0 ms
Total Response Time
9.0 ms
RGB Overshoot
0 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
13.1 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
13.1 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
0 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
NormalHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FastHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FastestHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

Motion
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
Yes
Maximum Frequency
165 Hz
Minimum Frequency
120 Hz
Longest Pulse Width Brightness
136 cd/m²
Shortest Pulse Width Brightness
136 cd/m²
Pulse Width Control
No
Pulse Phase Control
No
Pulse Amplitude Control
No
VRR At The Same Time
No

Refresh RateMotion Blur Photo
165HzPhoto
120HzPhoto

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD has a backlight strobing feature, commonly known as black frame insertion, to help reduce persistence blur. It works within a narrow range and has limited compatibility. It also results in some image duplication.

8.7
Motion
VRR Flicker
Dark Gray Flicker
0.8 RGB
Middle Gray Flicker
1.3 RGB
Light Gray Flicker
1.1 RGB

This monitor doesn't have any noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates, which is excellent for gaming.

10
Motion
Image Flicker
Flicker-Free
Yes
PWM Dimming Frequency
0 Hz

This monitor has a flicker-free backlight, which helps reduce eye strain during long gaming sessions.

Inputs
8.8
Inputs
Input Lag
Native Resolution @ Max Hz
3.8 ms
Native Resolution @ 120Hz
4.9 ms
Native Resolution @ 60Hz
9.0 ms
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
7.7 ms

This monitor has low input lag for a responsive feel while gaming.

7.5
Inputs
Resolution
Native Resolution
2560 x 1440
Aspect Ratio
16:9
Megapixels
3.7 MP
Pixel Density
109 PPI
4.9
Inputs
PS5 Compatibility
4k @ 120Hz
No
4k @ 60Hz
Yes
1440p @ 120Hz
Yes
1440p @ 60Hz
Yes
1080p @ 120Hz
Yes
1080p @ 60Hz
Yes

This monitor supports most formats from the PS5, but due to the lack of HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, it can't accept a 4k @ 120Hz signal. Even though the native resolution of this monitor is 1440p, it still accepts a 4k signal and downscales the image. It results in a more detailed image than if you were to send a native 1440p signal.

7.1
Inputs
Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
4k @ 120Hz
No
4k @ 60Hz
Yes
1440p @ 120Hz
Yes
1440p @ 60Hz
Yes
1080p @ 120Hz
Yes
1080p @ 60Hz
Yes

This monitor supports almost everything from the Xbox Series X|S, but since its HDMI ports don't support HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, it doesn't support 4k @ 120Hz gaming. Even though this monitor's native resolution is 1440p, it still accepts a 4k signal and downscales the image. This is useful as the console only supports HDR signals in 4k.

Inputs
Inputs Photos
Inputs
Video And Audio Ports
DisplayPort
1 (DP 1.2)
Mini DisplayPort
No
HDMI
2 (HDMI 2.0)
HDMI 2.1 Rated Speed
No HDMI 2.1
DVI
No
VGA
No
Daisy Chaining
No
3.5mm Audio Out
1
3.5mm Audio In
No
HDR10
Yes
3.5mm Microphone In
No
Inputs
USB
USB-A Ports
2
USB-A Rated Speed
480Mbps (USB 2.0)
USB-B Upstream Port
Yes
USB-C Ports
1
USB-C Upstream
No
USB-C Rated Speed
No USB-C Upstream
USB-C Power Delivery
5W
USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode
Yes
Thunderbolt
No

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD 27 has a USB-B input that you can use as an upstream port when connected to your PC. It also has a USB-C input that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, allowing you to display an image from a compatible device. Although it is advertised to support a maximum of 15W of power delivery, in practice, it can only deliver 5W.

Inputs
macOS Compatibility

This monitor works perfectly with macOS. HDR and VRR both work perfectly, and there are no issues with sleep mode.

Features
Features
Additional Features
Speakers
No
RGB Illumination
Controllable
Multiple Input Display
No
KVM Switch
No

There are a ton of extra features on this monitor, which you can see below:

  • Crosshair: Adds a crosshair on the screen for FPS games.
  • Frame Rate Counter: Displays the current frame rate.
  • Blue Light Reduction: Removes blue light to help reduce eye strain.
  • Gaming OSD 2.0: This downloadable software gives more options than just the regular OSD. You can control your peripherals, manage your windows, and assign a function to the macro button on the bottom left side of the monitor. You can also control the RGB lighting through this software. You have to connect the monitor to your computer via USB-B for these features to work.
  • Console Mode: This feature is designed to downscale 4k content to 1440p on consoles.

Features
On-Screen Display (OSD)