Get insider access
Preferred store
Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
We've recently released Test Bench 2.0 for Monitors! Read our new VRR Flicker R&D Article and Pursuit Photo R&D Article to learn more.

Prime Big Deal Days Deal: The Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 has dropped by $352 on Amazon.com. See all Monitor Prime Big Deal Days deals.

Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) Monitor Review

Tested using Methodology v2.0
Review updated Jun 10, 2024 at 09:59 am
Latest change: Retest Jun 21, 2024 at 02:03 pm
Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) Picture
7.1
PC Gaming
6.5
Console Gaming
7.4
Office
7.3
Editing
7.5
Brightness
7.4
Response Time
5.1
HDR Picture
6.7
SDR Picture
8.7
Color Accuracy
This monitor was replaced by the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is a 27-inch 1440p budget-friendly gaming monitor with extra productivity features. It has a maximum refresh rate of 170Hz and VRR support to reduce screen tearing. It also has several additional features, including a Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture mode, a USB-C port that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, and a KVM switch that lets you control two devices with the same mouse and keyboard.

Gigabyte has released a second version of this monitor, the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0), which replaces the original version. It uses a different panel with an RGB subpixel layout instead of the BGR subpixel layout on the first version. It's unclear which version you'll get when buying from retailers, but the second version is more available, and there are differences on the boxes of the two versions to tell them apart, which you can read more about in the variants section. 

Our Verdict

7.1 PC Gaming

The Gigabyte M27Q is decent for PC gaming. It has a high 170Hz refresh rate for a smooth feel and VRR support to reduce screen tearing. It also has low input lag and a fast response time, but there's still motion blur with fast-moving objects. However, it has a low contrast ratio and no local dimming feature, so deep blacks appear gray in darker environments, and highlights don't pop in HDR either.

Pros
  • Decent overall response time.
  • High 170Hz refresh rate.
  • VRR support.
  • Low input lag.
Cons
  • Low contrast ratio.
  • Some blur with fast-moving objects.
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.
6.5 Console Gaming

The Gigabyte M27Q is okay for console gaming. It lacks HDMI 2.0 bandwidth to take full advantage of the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S, but it still offers good gaming performance with low input lag for a responsive feel. It also has a decent response time, but fast-moving objects still have motion blur. However, it has limited picture quality with a low contrast ratio that makes blacks look gray, and it doesn't make highlights pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Decent overall response time.
  • Low input lag.
Cons
  • Low contrast ratio.
  • Some blur with fast-moving objects.
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.
7.4 Office

The Gigabyte M27Q is good for office use. Its 27-inch screen provides plenty of space for multitasking, but it has worse text clarity than other 1440p monitors due to its subpixel layout. It has great brightness and decent reflection handling and overcomes glare in most environments. It also has wide viewing angles so that images remain consistent when viewed from the sides. However, it lacks swivel adjustment, which is an issue if you need to turn the screen to show your work to others. On the plus side, it includes a KVM switch and a USB-C port for you to quickly connect a laptop, but it's limited to 10W of power.

Pros
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Overcomes glare in most environments.
  • Displays wide range of colors.
  • KVM switch.
Cons
  • Worse text clarity than other 27-inch, 1440p monitors.
  • No swivel adjustment.
7.3 Editing

The Gigabyte M27Q is decent for content creation. Its 27-inch screen is big enough to open two windows side by side, but it has worse text clarity than other 1440p monitors due to its subpixel layout. It has an excellent sRGB mode, so you don't need to calibrate it for accurate colors. It has wide viewing angles, so the image remains consistent from the sides, too. However, it has a low contrast ratio, and no local dimming feature, so deep blacks appear gray in darker environments, and it's disappointing if you need to edit HDR content.

Pros
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Overcomes glare in most environments.
  • Displays wide range of colors.
  • KVM switch.
Cons
  • Worse text clarity than other 27-inch, 1440p monitors.
  • No swivel adjustment.
  • Low contrast ratio.
  • No local dimming.
7.5 Brightness

The Gigabyte M27Q has good brightness. It gets bright enough to fight glare, but it doesn't make highlights pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Overcomes glare in most environments.
Cons
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.
7.4 Response Time

The Gigabyte M27Q has a decent response time. While its response time is fast with most refresh rates, there's still noticeable blur with fast-moving objects.

Pros
  • Decent overall response time.
Cons
  • Some blur with fast-moving objects.
5.1 HDR Picture

The Gigabyte M27Q is bad for HDR. It has a low contrast ratio makes black look gray, and it lacks a local dimming feature to further improve it. It also can't make colors look vivid.

Pros
Cons
  • Low contrast ratio.
  • No local dimming.
6.7 SDR Picture

The Gigabyte M27Q has okay SDR picture quality. While it displays a wide range of colors, it has limited picture quality as it has a low contrast ratio that makes blacks look gray.

Pros
  • Displays wide range of colors.
Cons
  • Low contrast ratio.
8.7 Color Accuracy

The Gigabyte M27Q has excellent color accuracy. It has a very accurate sRGB mode, but you can still calibrate it for the best accuracy.

Pros
  • Accurate sRGB mode.
Cons
  • 7.1 PC Gaming
  • 6.5 Console Gaming
  • 7.4 Office
  • 7.3 Editing

Performance Usages

  • 7.5 Brightness
  • 7.4 Response Time
  • 5.1 HDR Picture
  • 6.7 SDR Picture
  • 8.7 Color Accuracy
  1. Updated Jun 21, 2024: Changed the color of the 4k compatibility column in the Xbox Series X|S table for consistency with other reviews.
  2. Updated Jun 10, 2024: Updated text throughout the review according to Test Bench 2.0, mainly in the Verdict and Motion sections.
  3. Updated Jun 07, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.0. This includes new tests for VRR Motion Performance, Refresh Rate Compliance, Cumulative Absolute Deviation (CAD), and VRR Flicker. You can read the full changelog here.
  4. Updated Feb 07, 2024: Updated text to reflect changes with Test Bench 1.2.
  5. Updated Oct 26, 2023: Clarified the differences between this monitor and the newer Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) in the Intro and Updated Aug 23, 2023: Added that the Gigabyte M27Q P is a newer monitor that uses an RGB subpixel layout for better Text Clarity.
  6. Updated Apr 14, 2023: Confirmed that 1440p works on this monitor with the PS5.
  7. Updated Mar 22, 2023: Clarified text throughout as part of Test Bench 1.2, including adding text to the Console Compatibility boxes.
  8. Updated Jan 18, 2023: Added in the Variants and Text Clarity sections that the Rev. 2.0 variant likely uses an RGB subpixel layout.
  9. Updated Nov 03, 2022: Clarified that there are different versions for it in the Variants section and specified that the review is valid for all versions.
  10. Updated Sep 20, 2022: We bought and tested the HP X27q, which is a similar budget gaming monitor. We added a few relevant comparisons to this review.
  11. Updated May 02, 2022: We tested the monitor with the PS5's new variable refresh rate feature and confirmed that it's not compatible, since the PS5 only supports HDMI Forum VRR.
  12. Updated Apr 08, 2022: Updated to Test Bench 1.2, resulting in changes to the results and scores with the Response Time and Input Lag. Added tests for Console Compatibility and macOS compatibility and made minor changes to other tests, which you can see in our Changelog.
  13. Updated Jan 12, 2022: Checked the BFI range and checked a motion issue.
  14. Updated Nov 25, 2021: We decreased the text clarity score from 7.5 to 7.0, as the BGR subpixel layout can be an issue for some users.
  15. Updated Feb 12, 2021: We tested text clarity with a MacBook running on Big Sur.
  16. Updated Jan 25, 2021: We've retested the monitor to further investigate the BGR sub-pixel layout's effect on text clarity.
  17. Updated Jan 20, 2021: Review published.
  18. Updated Jan 13, 2021: Early access published.
  19. Updated Jan 11, 2021: Our testers have started testing this product.
  20. Updated Jan 11, 2021: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.
  21. Updated Dec 28, 2020: We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We tested the 27-inch Gigabyte M27Q, which is the only size available for this monitor. Some European retailers also carry an M27Q-EK or M27Q-EEK variant. It's the same monitor but with the new energy efficiency labels.

This monitor is the original version of the M27Q, which has a BGR subpixel layout and is different than the newer Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0), which has an RGB subpixel layout. It's unclear which version you'll get when buying from retailers, as they don't specify if it's Rev. 1.0 or Rev. 2.0. The two versions have slightly different designs on the boxes they come with. You can see the box we got with Rev. 1.0 here and the one with Rev. 2.0 here. The biggest difference is that Rev. 1.0 is labeled as '170Hz' on the box, while Rev. 2.0 is labeled as '165Hz,' but each has a max refresh rate of 170Hz. That said, the second version is more available with most retailers.

There are also follow-up models to this monitor: the Gigabyte M27Q X, which has a higher max refresh rate, and the Gigabyte M27Q P, which supports DisplayPort 1.4 bandwidth. You can see the differences below, but the results are only valid for the first version of the M27Q.

Model Size Panel Type Resolution Refresh Rate DisplayPort Type
M27Q (rev. 1.0) 27" IPS (BGR) 2560 x 1440 170Hz 1.2
M27Q (rev. 2.0) 27" IPS (RGB) 2560 x 1440 170Hz 1.2
M27Q P 27" IPS (RGB) 2560 x 1440 170Hz 1.4

Our unit was manufactured in August 2020; you can see the label here.

Compared To Other Monitors

The Gigabyte M27Q is a good budget monitor that's well-suited to a number of uses. In addition to its great decent gaming performance, it's a good choice for work-from-home setups. The KVM switch lets you use the same keyboard and mouse with two computers with the press of a switch, but it has limited power delivery over USB-C. However, its BGR subpixel layout results in worse text clarity than other 27-inch, 1440p monitors, which may be distracting to some, but the newer Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) doesn't have this same panel type. If you don't need the office features of the Gigabyte monitor and want a budget monitor mainly for gaming, you can also consider the Dell G2724D, which has better motion handling.

For more options, check out our recommendations for the best 1440p gaming monitors, the best 27-inch monitors, and the best budget gaming monitors.

Gigabyte G27Q

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better for gaming than the Gigabyte G27Q. It has a higher 170Hz refresh rate and a much quicker response time at 60Hz, resulting in minimal motion blur. It has a better SDR color gamut, making it a better choice for content creators, and it has a KVM feature allowing you to control two devices with the same mouse and keyboard. On the other hand, the G27Q has a bit better reflection handling and gets slightly brighter in HDR, but these are minor differences and may be hard to notice.

LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B are similar 1440p gaming monitors. The Gigabyte has extra productivity features like a USB-C port and KVM switch, making it the better choice if you need to connect different computers. However, the LG has a faster response time, leading to less motion blur with fast-moving objects.

ASUS TUF VG27AQ

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ perform very similarly. They're both 27-inch IPS monitors with a 1440p resolution. The Gigabyte has better response times at max refresh rate and 60Hz. Its refresh rate is slightly higher, 170Hz compared to the ASUS' 165Hz, but this isn't noticeable. Although both monitors have a black frame insertion feature, only the ASUS' can be used simultaneously with VRR, and it works over a wider frequency range than the Gigabyte. The Gigabyte has more features for productivity, including a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alt Mode and Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture, but its BGR sub-pixel layout might bother some people as it can affect text clarity in some instances.

Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx

The Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very similar. They're both IPS monitors with a 1440p resolution and a 170Hz refresh rate. Gaming-wise, the Acer has better response times, at max refresh rate and 60Hz. It also has significantly better ergonomics because it allows for swivel adjustment and rotation to portrait mode. The Gigabyte has more features, like a USB-C input with DisplayPort Alt Mode and a Picture-in-Picture and Picture-by-Picture mode.

Gigabyte M28U

The Gigabyte M28U is a higher-end monitor than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0), but choosing the best one depends on your usage. The M28U has a higher resolution screen, making it a better choice for office use or media creation. The M28U also features two HDMI 2.1 ports, so it's also a better choice for console gamers looking to get the most out of their PS5 or Xbox Series S|X. On the other hand, the M27Q is slightly better for most PC gamers, as it has slightly lower input lag and less overshoot.

Dell G2724D

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Dell G2724D are both budget-friendly 1440p gaming monitors, with a few differences. The Gigabyte has extra features like a USB hub and KVM switch, making it a great choice if you need something versatile for different computers. However, the Dell has better text clarity due to its subpixel layout, and it's the better choice for gamers, thanks to its faster response time at any refresh rate.

MSI G274QPF-QD

The MSI G274QPF-QD and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are 27-inch gaming monitors. Both have similar overall performance, though the Gigabyte is better in brighter environments, as it gets considerably brighter in SDR. The Gigabyte also has better motion handling, so fast-moving objects look more crisp, making it a better choice for fast-moving games. However, the MSI has a wider HDR color gamut, so it displays more realistic colors with HDR videos and games.

Gigabyte M27Q X

The Gigabyte M27Q X is a bit better than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0). The Q X has a higher native refresh rate, resulting in a faster response time and clearer motion in general. The Q X also has a more standard RGB subpixel layout, resulting in clearer text.

Gigabyte M27Q P

The Gigabyte M27Q P is the newer version of the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and has many of the same features. The main difference is that the P version has an RGB subpixel layout for improved text clarity versus the M27Q (rev. 1.0), and the P model also supports higher DisplayPort 1.4 bandwidth. The performance between the two is similar, with the M27Q (rev. 1.0) getting a bit brighter and having a faster response time at the max refresh rate. On top of that, the M27Q (rev. 1.0) also has a lower input lag at 60Hz.

ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very similar 1440p gaming monitors with a 170Hz refresh rate. Gaming-wise, the Gigabyte performs better because it has a faster response time, at max refresh rate and 60Hz. It also has wider viewing angles, gets brighter to combat glare, and offers more features like USB-C input, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and an integrated KVM.

LG 27GL850-B/27GL83A-B

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is a bit better than the LG 27GL850-B/27GL83A-B for most uses. Although they have similar response times, the Gigabyte has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz compared to the LG's 144Hz, resulting in a slightly smoother and more responsive gaming experience. Also, the Gigabyte's input lag is much lower at 60Hz than the LG's, making it more ideal for 60fps console gaming. For those in a well-lit room, the LG has better reflection handling, but it doesn't get as bright. The Gigabyte has more productivity features, including a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alt Mode support, an integrated KVM switch, and a Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture mode.

Gigabyte M27U

The Gigabyte M27U is a higher-end monitor than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0), so it's the better choice for most gamers. This is because the M27U has a higher 4k resolution, resulting in more detailed images and sharper clarity. It also has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of gaming consoles and modern graphics cards, and it has a faster response time, leading to sharper motion.

Gigabyte M32Q

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Gigabyte M32Q are very similar overall, but the M32Q is slightly better for most people. The M32Q has better ergonomics, with a stand that can swivel and a wider height adjustment. The M32Q also uses a more standard RGB subpixel structure, whereas the M27Q uses a suboptimal BGR structure, which can cause some text clarity issues in certain apps.

Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T

The Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are different types of gaming monitors. The Samsung is available in a 27-inch and 32-inch size, while the Gigabyte is only available in a 27-inch. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate of 240Hz and a faster response time, resulting in smoother motion and greater responsiveness, although the difference is not that big and might be hard to notice for casual players. The Samsung is better for dark rooms because it has a VA panel with a better contrast ratio, while the Gigabyte has wider viewing angles because it has an IPS panel. The Gigabyte has a few more features, like a USB-C input and KVM, which lets you control two devices with one set of peripherals.

Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)

The Gigabyte M27Q is available in two versions: the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0). The main difference is that the first version has a BGR subpixel layout, while the second version has an RGB subpixel layout. This results in better text clarity on the second version because computer programs render text better with the RGB subpixel layout. However, besides that, the first version has an advantage in most areas, as it gets brighter and has a faster response time, leading to less motion blur.

MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are two decent gaming monitors with a 1440p resolution. They each have fast response time, low input lag, FreeSync support, and G-SYNC compatibility. The MSI has much better ergonomics, making it easy to place the screen how you like. However, the Gigabyte has much better out-of-the-box accuracy, so colors don't look oversaturated like they do on the MSI. It also has Picture-by-Picture/Picture-in-Picture modes, allowing you to display images from two sources at once.

Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50 are similar 1440p gaming monitors. They have similar gaming features with good motion handling and low input lag. The Samsung is better for co-op gaming because it has better ergonomics as the stand can swivel. However, the Gigabyte is better for productivity because it features a USB hub with two USB 3.0 inputs and a USB-C input, which the Samsung doesn't have.

ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ

The ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both excellent gaming monitors. They have a lot of similar features, including a 170Hz refresh rate and fast response times, and both support VRR to reduce screen tearing. If you're going to be using the monitor for content creation as well, the Gigabyte also offers greater coverage of the Adobe RGB color space, and it includes a USB-C port, allowing for more connectivity options.

Dell Alienware AW2724DM

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Dell Alienware AW2724DM are similar 1440p gaming monitors. The Dell has a slightly higher 180Hz refresh rate compared to the 170Hz refresh rate on the Gigabyte, and it has better motion handling at higher refresh rates, but the Gigabyte has an optional backlight strobing feature to reduce persistence blur. While they're both excellent for gaming, there are a few differences when it comes to office work, as the Dell has better ergonomics. However, the Gigabyte has more office features like a KVM switch and USB-C port, meaning it's easier to multitask with it.

LG 27GN800-B

The LG 27GN800-B and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both excellent gaming monitors. Looking past the terrible ergonomics on the LG, they both perform fairly similarly. That said, the Gigabyte has an overclockable refresh rate of 170Hz, higher than the 144Hz max refresh rate of the LG. The Gigabyte also gets brighter in SDR and HDR, and it has one of the widest color gamuts on any monitor we've tested, which is great if you also do color-critical work. Even though its response time isn't quite as fast as the LG's, the Gigabyte offers more versatility thanks to its additional features, including USB 3.0 ports and a USB-C port, as well as a Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture mode. 

HP OMEN 27q

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the HP OMEN 27q are both budget-friendly 1440p monitors, but they have a few differences. The Gigabyte has a few extra features, like a USB hub and a KVM switch, making it better for multitasking. It's also better for gaming, as it's more compatible with consoles. That said, the HP uses a different subpixel layout with better text clarity.

LG 27GR83Q-B

The LG 27GR83Q-B and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both budget-friendly gaming monitors, with a few differences. The LG is a bit higher-end as it has a faster 240Hz refresh rate and supports HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, which the Gigabyte doesn't support. This means that the LG is the better choice for consoles or if you have a modern graphics card. The LG also has better motion handling at high refresh rates and better text clarity. If you want something for work, the Gigabyte has extra features, like a KVM switch and USB-C port.

AOC CQ27G2

Although the AOC CQ27G2 and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both 1440p gaming monitors, there are many differences between them. Gaming-wise, the Gigabyte performs better because it has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz and a much faster response time. The Gigabyte has an IPS with wider viewing angles, while the AOC has a VA panel that makes it a better choice for dark rooms. The Gigabyte offers more features, like a USB-C input, HDR support, and a Picture-in-Picture mode. It also gets much brighter to combat glare.

Samsung Odyssey G5 C27G55T

The Samsung Odyssey G5 C27G55T and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both 1440p gaming monitors but with different types of panels. The Samsung has a VA panel that's better suited for dark rooms, while the Gigabyte uses an IPS panel with wider viewing angles. As for gaming performance, the Gigabyte performs much better. It has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz and a much faster response time. The Gigabyte supports a wide color gamut for HDR, gets brighter, and offers more features like a USB-C input.

Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are different types of entry-level gaming monitors, mainly due to their panel types and features. The Gigabyte is more well-rounded, with wider viewing angles and better motion handling, so it's better for gaming. The Gigabyte also has extra productivity perks like a USB-C port and a KVM switch that makes it easy to use two computers connected to the monitor with the same keyboard and mouse. On the other hand, the Samsung is the better choice if you want to use it in a dark room, as it has a higher contrast ratio.

Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is a better budget-friendly gaming monitor than the Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51. The Gigabyte has much better motion handling thanks to its faster response time, and it has a few extra features like a USB hub, including a USB-C port. The Gigabyte is also better for everyday use, like if you want to use it in a well-lit room, as it gets brighter and displays a wider range of more accurate colors. The Samsung has an advantage if you want to use it in a dark room because it has a better contrast ratio. The Samsung also has better ergonomics, making placing it in an ideal position easier.

Gigabyte G27QC

Overall, the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) performs better than the Gigabyte G27QC. Gaming-wise, the M27Q has a slightly higher 170Hz refresh rate, and its response time is much faster with less overshoot, resulting in clearer images in fast-moving scenes. The M27Q has wider viewing angles for sharing content and playing co-op games, and it gets much brighter to combat glare in well-lit rooms. It also has a much better SDR and HDR color gamut, making it better for content creators. If you often game in the dark, the G27QC might be a better choice because it has a VA panel that can produce deep blacks. Also, while its response time isn't as good as the M27Q's, it's still great and should satisfy most gamers.

AOC 24G2

The AOC 24G2 and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both excellent gaming monitors but with different specs. The AOC has a 24" screen with a 1080p resolution and a 144Hz refresh rate, while the Gigabyte has a 27" screen with a 1440p resolution and 170Hz refresh rate. The Gigabyte is a more versatile monitor because its larger screen and higher pixel density are better suited for productivity and media consumption. It also has wider viewing angles so that you can share content easily, and it gets brighter to combat glare. The Gigabyte supports HDR and can deliver a relatively decent experience, whereas the AOC doesn't support HDR at all.

BenQ EX2780Q

The BenQ EX2780Q and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both 27-inch 1440p gaming monitors. The Gigabyte performs better for the most part. It has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz, a faster response time, and more features, like a USB-C input, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a KVM.

Dell S2721DGF

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Dell S2721DGF are very similar overall. Gaming-wise, the Dell has faster response times. Its refresh rate is just a bit lower, 165Hz compared to the Gigabyte's 170Hz; however, this is a small difference that isn't noticeable. It also has significantly better ergonomics, making it easier to position the screen the way you want. On the other hand, the Gigabyte has more features. It includes a USB-C port that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, an integrated KVM switch, and a Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture mode that lets you display two input signals simultaneously, which can be useful for streamers running on two computers.

LG 27GN850-B/27GN880-B

The LG 27GN850-B/27GN880-B and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both great 1440p IPS gaming monitors. They perform very similarly gaming-wise; the Gigabyte has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz, but the LG has a better response time. The Gigabyte offers more features, such as a USB-C input that supports DisplayPort and charging, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a KVM. It also has a wider color gamut for HDR and gets much brighter overall.

Lenovo Legion Y27q-20

The Lenovo Legion Y27q-20 and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) have very similar gaming performances, so they mainly differ in features. The Lenovo has better ergonomics because it allows for swivel and pivot adjustments. On the other hand, the Gigabyte gets brighter to combat glare, displays a wider range of colors in HDR, and offers more features, like USB-C input and a Picture-in-Picture mode.

ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV

The ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very different monitors. The ASUS is designed for productivity and offers significantly better ergonomics. The Gigabyte is primarily a gaming monitor with a much higher refresh rate and faster response time to deliver a better gaming experience. The Gigabyte also has more features, like HDR support, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM switch so that you can control two devices with one set of peripherals. If you plan on only using it for work, it might be better to go with the ASUS because the Gigabyte has a BGR subpixel layout that might cause blurry text in some applications.

Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X

The Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both excellent gaming monitors with similar features. The FI27Q-X has a higher 240Hz refresh rate than the 170Hz on the M27Q, but they each have quick response times. The FI27Q-X has much better ergonomics as you can swivel and rotate it into portrait mode. On the other hand, the M27Q has a USB-C input, which the FI27Q-X doesn't have, so you can display an image from a compatible device and charge it at the same time.

HP X27q

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is a much better gaming monitor than the HP X27q. The Gigabyte has a faster response time, especially at lower refresh rates, resulting in much clearer motion with less blur around fast-moving objects. The Gigabyte also has better compatibility with the Xbox Series X and PS5 consoles, as it can display a downscaled 4k image.

Gigabyte M34WQ

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Gigabyte M34WQ deliver similar performance overall but have a different form factor. The Gigabyte M27Q has a slightly faster refresh rate and a bit better motion handling. The M34WQ has an ultrawide aspect ratio that's better for productivity, and it delivers a more immersive gaming experience. The increased resolution requires a more powerful graphics card, though, so if your PC can't maintain high frame rates with a 16x9 aspect ratio, it'll be even worse with an ultrawide.

Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70 are both excellent for gaming, but they're different types of monitors. The Gigabyte has a 1440p resolution with a 170Hz refresh rate, while the Samsung has a 4k resolution with a 144Hz refresh, and it has HDMI 2.1 inputs that make it a good choice for console gaming. The Gigabyte has better motion handling at 60Hz because there's more overshoot on the Samsung. The Gigabyte also has more productivity options like a USB-C input, and it gets brighter, but the Samsung has better ergonomics because you can swivel it.

Acer Nitro VG271UP Pbmiipx

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better than the Acer Nitro VG271UP Pbmiipx for most uses. The Gigabyte has a higher refresh rate and faster response time to deliver a clearer image in fast-moving scenes. It also has better ergonomics and gets brighter to fight glare. It has more features, like a USB hub with two USB 3.0s and a USB-C that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM.

+ Show more

Video

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
Design
Style
Curved
No
Curve Radius
Not Curved

This monitor has a relatively simple design. It has thin borders on three sides, a slightly thicker bottom bezel, and a flat V-shaped stand.

Design
Accelerated Longevity Test
Uniformity Pictures N/A
7.5
Design
Build Quality

The build quality is good. Although the monitor is made entirely of plastic, it feels sturdy and has no obvious issues. The back has very little flex, and the stand supports the monitor well.

7.0
Design
Ergonomics
Min Height To Top Of Panel
15.6" (39.5 cm)
Height Adjustment
5.1" (13.0 cm)
Tilt Range
-20° to 5°
Rotate Portrait/Landscape
No
Swivel Range
No swivel
Wall Mount
VESA 100x100

The ergonomics are decent. You can easily adjust it for yourself, but without swivel adjustment it's harder to share your screen with someone next to you. If you'd prefer a gaming monitor with better ergonomics, check out the Dell Alienware AW2721D.

The back has a clean design, with a mix of matte and glossy plastic. The stand has a small cutout for cable management. Unfortunately, there's no quick-release feature to remove the stand for VESA mounting.

Design
Stand
Base Width
15.7" (40.0 cm)
Base Depth
7.4" (18.8 cm)
Thickness (With Display)
5.8" (14.8 cm)
Weight (With Display)
13.7 lbs (6.2 kg)

The stand doesn't take up much desk space. It feels sturdy, and the screen doesn't wobble much when nudged.

Design
Display
Size
27"
Housing Width
24.2" (61.5 cm)
Housing Height
14.4" (36.7 cm)
Thickness (Without Stand)
1.7" (4.3 cm)
Weight (Without Stand)
9.0 lbs (4.1 kg)
Borders Size (Bezels)
0.3" (0.8 cm)
Design
Controls

A single joystick is on the right backside of the screen, which powers the monitor on and off and navigates the on-screen menu. There's also a KVM switch above the joystick control.

Design
In The Box
Power Supply
External Brick

  • DisplayPort cable
  • HDMI cable
  • USB-A to USB-B upstream cable
  • 3x power cords (NA, EU, and Australia)
  • Power supply
  • User guide

Picture Quality
6.3
Picture Quality
Contrast
Native Contrast
1,184 : 1
Contrast With Local Dimming
N/A

The contrast ratio is mediocre, so blacks appear gray in darker environments. This monitor has no local dimming feature to improve the contrast further. If you want a similar monitor with better contrast, check out the LG 32GN600-B.

0
Picture Quality
Local Dimming
Local Dimming
No
Backlight
Edge

This monitor doesn't have a local dimming feature. We still film these videos on the monitor so you can compare the backlight performance with a monitor that has local dimming.

8.3
Picture Quality
SDR Brightness
Real Scene
434 cd/m²
Peak 2% Window
422 cd/m²
Peak 10% Window
423 cd/m²
Peak 25% Window
423 cd/m²
Peak 50% Window
423 cd/m²
Peak 100% Window
423 cd/m²
Sustained 2% Window
422 cd/m²
Sustained 10% Window
422 cd/m²
Sustained 25% Window
423 cd/m²
Sustained 50% Window
422 cd/m²
Sustained 100% Window
423 cd/m²
Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
0.000
Minimum Brightness
43 cd/m²

The SDR brightness is great. There's almost no variation in brightness across different content, and it's bright enough to fight glare.

These results are from after calibration in the 'Custom 1' Picture Mode with Brightness set to max.

6.9
Picture Quality
HDR Brightness
VESA DisplayHDR Certification
DisplayHDR 400 - 1.0/1.1
Real Scene
443 cd/m²
Peak 2% Window
432 cd/m²
Peak 10% Window
434 cd/m²
Peak 25% Window
434 cd/m²
Peak 50% Window
434 cd/m²
Peak 100% Window
435 cd/m²
Sustained 2% Window
432 cd/m²
Sustained 10% Window
432 cd/m²
Sustained 25% Window
433 cd/m²
Sustained 50% Window
434 cd/m²
Sustained 100% Window
434 cd/m²
Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
0.000

The HDR peak brightness is okay. It's not much brighter than in SDR, and highlights don't pop. While it follows the PQ EOTF curve reasonably well throughout much of its range, it over brightens dark scenes and begins tone mapping too early, causing highlights to be less bright than they could be.

These results are from the the 'Custom 1' Picture Mode with Brightness set to max.

8.0
Picture Quality
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Left
37°
Color Washout From Right
39°
Color Shift From Left
69°
Color Shift From Right
70°
Brightness Loss From Left
44°
Brightness Loss From Right
46°
Black Level Raise From Left
70°
Black Level Raise From Right
70°
Gamma Shift From Left
39°
Gamma Shift From Right
40°

The horizontal viewing angle is great. Images remain consistent when viewed from the side, so it's a great choice if you need to share your screen with someone sitting next to you.

8.0
Picture Quality
Vertical Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Below
34°
Color Washout From Above
37°
Color Shift From Below
65°
Color Shift From Above
70°
Brightness Loss From Below
35°
Brightness Loss From Above
38°
Black Level Raise From Below
62°
Black Level Raise From Above
70°
Gamma Shift From Below
47°
Gamma Shift From Above
59°

The vertical viewing angle is great. The image remains consistent if you stand up and look down at the monitor.

7.9
Picture Quality
Gray Uniformity
50% Std. Dev.
2.723%
50% DSE
0.152%

The gray uniformity is very good. The left and right edges of the screen are darker; however, there's very little dirty screen effect.

5.5
Picture Quality
Black Uniformity
Native Std. Dev.
2.333%
Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
N/A

Black uniformity is sub-par, and there's no local dimming feature to improve it further. The screen looks cloudy, and there's visible backlight bleed along the top and bottom edges.

8.7
Picture Quality
Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
Picture Mode
sRGB
sRGB Gamut Area xy
100.3%
White Balance dE (Avg.)
3.14
Color Temperature (Avg.)
7,159 K
Gamma (Avg.)
2.25
Color dE (Avg.)
2.19
Contrast Setting
N/A
RGB Settings
Locked
Gamma Setting
Locked
Brightness Setting
18
Measured Brightness
110 cd/m²
Brightness Locked
No

This monitor has excellent accuracy in the sRGB mode. Colors are fairly accurate, and the white balance is good. Gamma follows the target sRGB curve fairly well, but dark scenes are too dark. The color temperature is also cool, giving the image a slightly blue tint.

Unfortunately, using the 'sRGB' Picture Mode locks other settings, including Overdrive and Aim Stabilizer. So, if you want to use those settings, you need to change Picture Mode to something else, like 'Custom 1,' which is still fairly accurate, but colors are more saturated, as you can see here.

9.8
Picture Quality
Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
Picture Mode
Custom 1
sRGB Gamut Area xy
99.8%
White Balance dE (Avg.)
0.53
Color Temperature (Avg.)
6,485 K
Gamma (Avg.)
2.18
Color dE (Avg.)
0.31
Contrast Setting
47
RGB Settings
99-100-92
Gamma Setting
Gamma 3
Brightness Setting
15
Measured Brightness
100 cd/m²
ICC Profile
Download

The accuracy after calibration is fantastic, and you won't notice any issues with the image. You can use any of the settings that are locked out in sRGB mode.

9.8
Picture Quality
SDR Color Gamut
sRGB Coverage xy
99.7%
sRGB Picture Mode
Custom 1
Adobe RGB Coverage xy
97.5%
Adobe RGB Picture Mode
Custom 1

The SDR color gamut is superb. It covers the entire sRGB color space used in most content and has nearly full coverage of the Adobe RGB color space, but some colors are oversaturated in this color space.

8.4
Picture Quality
HDR Color Gamut
Wide Color Gamut
Yes
DCI-P3 Coverage xy
92.5%
DCI-P3 Picture Mode
Custom 1
Rec. 2020 Coverage xy
73.9%
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
Custom 1

The HDR color gamut is great. It has excellent coverage of the commonly used DCI-P3 color space and acceptable coverage of the wider Rec. 2020. It tone maps well in DCI-P3, but it's worse with Rec. 2020, as white is considerably off.

7.2
Picture Quality
HDR Color Volume
1,000 cd/m² DCI-P3 Coverage ICtCp
61.8%
DCI-P3 Picture Mode
Custom 1
10,000 cd/m² Rec. 2020 Coverage ICtCp
27.9%
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
Custom 1

The HDR color volume is decent. It's mainly limited by its incomplete color gamut, and it can't display bright and dark colors very well.

7.0
Picture Quality
Text Clarity
Pixel Type
IPS
Subpixel Layout
BGR

This monitor has decent text clarity. Windows ClearType (top photo) makes diagonal lines look better, like on the R and N. It uses a BGR subpixel layout, which causes text to look worse in programs that aren't designed to render text in the BGR subpixel layout. That said, the difference between this BGR layout and text from RGB panels on most other monitors isn't very noticeable for some at native scaling unless you're actively looking for it.

If text looks blurry due to the BGR subpixel layout, you can mount the screen upside down, which gives it a proper RGB layout. However, this workaround seems to increase input lag at the maximum refresh rate to 15.1 ms from the standard 3.2 ms, and G-SYNC doesn't work properly.

A second version of this monitor, the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0), uses an RGB subpixel layout, so you won't have any of the same text clarity issues with that monitor.

Here are some photos taken at 100% and 125% scaling, with ClearType on and off, as well as with the screen turned upside down:

  • No Scaling, ClearType set to BGR
  • No Scaling, ClearType off
  • No Scaling, ClearType set to RGB
  • No Scaling, Google Sheets
  • 125% Scaling, ClearType set to BGR
  • 125% Scaling, ClearType off
  • 125% Scaling, ClearType set to RGB
  • 125% Scaling, Google Sheets
  • Screen upside down, ClearType Off
  • Screen upside down, ClearType On
  • Screen upside down, Google Sheets
  • Here are some photos of text from a MacBook running on Big Sur. It appears that macOS doesn't use subpixel dimming in any of the apps we tested, which includes Safari, TextEdit, Notes, Finder, and Chrome, so the BGR subpixel layout doesn't cause blurry text.

  • TextEdit
  • Google Sheets in Safari
  • Safari Search Bar
  • Notes
  • Finder
  • Sheets in Google Chrome
  • 7.3
    Picture Quality
    Reflections
    Screen Finish
    Matte
    Total Reflections
    5.4%
    Indirect Reflections
    2.5%
    Calculated Direct Reflections
    2.8%

    The Gigabyte M27Q 27 has decent reflection handling. While it handles glare effectively in most environments, it struggles with direct sunlight, though the screen gets bright enough to compensate. If reflection handling is important to you, look into the Razer Raptor 27 165Hz.

    9.5
    Picture Quality
    Gradient
    Color Depth
    10 Bit

    The gradient handling is fantastic. There's almost no banding in areas of similar color.

    Motion
    7.6
    Motion
    Refresh Rate
    Native Refresh Rate
    170 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate
    170 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over DP
    170 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
    144 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over DP @ 10-bit
    120 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI @ 10-Bit
    60 Hz

    Due to bandwidth limitations, this monitor can only reach 170Hz over a DisplayPort connection with 8-bit color. If you want a monitor with an even higher refresh rate, consider the Acer Predator X25 bmiiprzx.

    Motion
    Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
    Variable Refresh Rate
    Yes
    FreeSync
    Yes
    G-SYNC
    Compatible (Tested)
    VRR Maximum
    170 Hz
    VRR Minimum
    < 20 Hz
    VRR Supported Connectors
    DisplayPort, HDMI

    NVIDIAVRR MinVRR Max
    DisplayPort<20Hz170Hz
    HDMIN/AN/A

    AMDVRR MinVRR Max
    DisplayPort<20Hz170Hz
    HDMI<20Hz144Hz

    7.4
    Motion
    VRR Motion Performance
    Recommended VRR OD Setting
    Picture Quality
    Variable Overdrive Advertised
    Yes
    Avg. CAD
    207
    Best CAD
    205
    Worst CAD
    208

    Refresh RateCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    169HeatmapChartPhoto
    165HeatmapChartPhoto
    144HeatmapChartPhoto
    120HeatmapChartPhoto
    100HeatmapChartPhoto
    80HeatmapChartPhoto
    60HeatmapChartPhoto

    The Giabyte M27Q has decent motion handling across its refresh rate range, but there's still some motion blur with fast-moving objects. The 'Picture Quality' Overdrive setting performs consistently the best, while the other settings get much worse at lower refresh rates. The 'Smart OD' setting acts as a variable overdrive where it's meant to change the overdrive based on the refresh rate, but it performs like 'Balance'.

    7.2
    Motion
    Refresh Rate Compliance
    Compliance @ Max Hz
    44%
    Compliance @ 120 FPS
    56%
    Compliance @ 60 FPS
    76%

    The refresh rate compliance is decent. Its response time isn't fast enough to make full color transitions before the monitor draws the next frame at high refresh rates, but it's better at lower refresh rates.

    7.8
    Motion
    CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
    OD Transition Max Refresh Rate
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Balance
    Avg. CAD
    153
    Best 10% CAD
    86
    Worst 10% CAD
    258

    Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    Smart ODHeatmapChartPhoto
    Picture QualityHeatmapChartPhoto
    BalanceHeatmapChartPhoto
    SpeedHeatmapChartPhoto

    The CAD at the max refresh rate of 170Hz is good. The 'Balance' overdrive has a fast total response time, leading to minimal motion blur, but there's still some inverse ghosting. If that bothers you, the 'Picture Quality' setting is better, but it has more blur.

    Motion
    Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Balance
    First Response Time
    4.2 ms
    Total Response Time
    9.1 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    10 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    11.3 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    13.0 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    24 RGB

    Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
    Smart ODHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    Picture QualityHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    BalanceHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    SpeedHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

    7.2
    Motion
    CAD @ 120Hz
    OD Transition 120Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Picture Quality
    Avg. CAD
    207
    Best 10% CAD
    115
    Worst 10% CAD
    297

    Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    Smart ODHeatmapChartPhoto
    Picture QualityHeatmapChartPhoto
    BalanceHeatmapChartPhoto
    SpeedHeatmapChartPhoto

    The CAD at 120Hz is decent. There's noticeable blur with fast-moving objects, but there isn't any noticeable inverse ghosting with the 'Picture Quality' setting. That said, the other settings have too much overshoot, leading to inverse ghosting.

    Motion
    Response Time @ 120Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Picture Quality
    First Response Time
    9.2 ms
    Total Response Time
    9.2 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    0 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    13.0 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    13.0 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    0 RGB

    Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
    Smart ODHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    Picture QualityHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    BalanceHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    SpeedHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

    7.1
    Motion
    CAD @ 60Hz
    OD Transition 60Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Picture Quality
    Avg. CAD
    210
    Best 10% CAD
    130
    Worst 10% CAD
    301

    Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    Smart ODHeatmapChartPhoto
    Picture QualityHeatmapChartPhoto
    BalanceHeatmapChartPhoto
    SpeedHeatmapChartPhoto

    The CAD at 60Hz is decent. The 'Picture Quality' overdrive setting performs similarly at 120Hz, and the other settings have too much inverse ghosting.

    Motion
    Response Time @ 60Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Picture Quality
    First Response Time
    10.0 ms
    Total Response Time
    10.0 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    0 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    16.1 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    16.1 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    0 RGB

    Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
    Smart ODHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    Picture QualityHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    BbalanceHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    SpeedHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

    Motion
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    Yes
    Maximum Frequency
    170 Hz
    Minimum Frequency
    80 Hz
    Longest Pulse Width Brightness
    175 cd/m²
    Shortest Pulse Width Brightness
    175 cd/m²
    Pulse Width Control
    No
    Pulse Phase Control
    No
    Pulse Amplitude Control
    No
    VRR At The Same Time
    Yes

    Refresh RateVRRMotion Blur Photo
    170HzOnPhoto
    170HzOffPhoto
    120HzOnPhoto
    120HzOffPhoto
    80HzOnPhoto

    This monitor has a backlight strobing feature to reduce persistence blur. However, when enabled, it produces notable amounts of image duplication and locks the Overdrive setting to 'Smart OD,' which results in a lot of inverse ghosting. You can use the feature as low as 80 fps with VRR enabled, but below that it stops working and doesn't turn back on until it reaches the max refresh rate again.

    9.1
    Motion
    VRR Flicker
    Dark Gray Flicker
    0.8 RGB
    Middle Gray Flicker
    0.3 RGB
    Light Gray Flicker
    0.2 RGB

    The Gigabyte M27Q gaming monitor has no visible VRR flicker with changing frame rates, which is fantastic for gaming.

    10
    Motion
    Image Flicker
    Flicker-Free
    Yes
    PWM Dimming Frequency
    0 Hz

    The backlight remains flicker-free at all brightness levels, which helps reduce eye strain if you're sensitive to flicker.

    Inputs
    9.0
    Inputs
    Input Lag
    Native Resolution @ Max Hz
    3.2 ms
    Native Resolution @ 120Hz
    4.9 ms
    Native Resolution @ 60Hz
    8.5 ms
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    3.9 ms

    The input lag is low, so you won't notice any delay, and you'll get a responsive feel.

    7.5
    Inputs
    Resolution
    Native Resolution
    2560 x 1440
    Aspect Ratio
    16:9
    Megapixels
    3.7 MP
    Pixel Density
    109 PPI
    4.9
    Inputs
    PS5 Compatibility
    4k @ 120Hz
    No
    4k @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    7.1
    Inputs
    Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
    4k @ 120Hz
    No
    4k @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz
    Yes

    The monitor supports 4k signals by downscaling them, which is convenient because the Xbox Series X|S only supports HDR in 4k.

    Inputs
    Inputs Photos
    Inputs
    Video And Audio Ports
    DisplayPort
    1 (DP 1.2)
    Mini DisplayPort
    No
    HDMI
    2 (HDMI 2.0)
    HDMI 2.1 Rated Speed
    No HDMI 2.1
    DVI
    No
    VGA
    No
    Daisy Chaining
    No
    3.5mm Audio Out
    1
    3.5mm Audio In
    No
    HDR10
    Yes
    3.5mm Microphone In
    No
    Inputs
    USB
    USB-A Ports
    2
    USB-A Rated Speed
    5Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 1)
    USB-B Upstream Port
    Yes
    USB-C Ports
    1
    USB-C Upstream
    Yes
    USB-C Rated Speed
    5Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 1)
    USB-C Power Delivery
    10W
    USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode
    Yes
    Thunderbolt
    No

    The Gigabyte M27Q Gaming Monitor has a KVM feature, allowing you to use the same mouse and keyboard to control two devices. To use it, plug the mouse and keyboard into the USB 3.0 ports, the primary device into the USB-B port, and the secondary device into the USB-C port. Then, press the KVM button (above the monitor's main control joystick) to switch between the two devices.

    The USB-C port supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, which lets you display an image from a compatible device and charge it simultaneously with a single cable. However, this port only delivers 10W of power, which isn't enough to charge or sustain a standard laptop while it's in use.

    Inputs
    macOS Compatibility

    This Gigabyte M27Q 27 has issues working with macOS in certain picture modes. The 'FPS,' 'RTS/RPG,' and 'Movie' modes cause the screen to flicker, even with a fixed refresh rate. Additionally, enabling VRR while in 'FPS,' 'RTS/RPG,' or 'Movie' mode in HDR causes an aggressive visual effect (Note: The preceding video shows flickering and/or rapid distortion effects).

    It appears that macOS doesn't use subpixel dimming in any of the apps we tested. For more information on this, see the text clarity section.

    Features
    Features
    Additional Features
    Speakers
    No
    RGB Illumination
    No
    Multiple Input Display
    PIP + PBP
    KVM Switch
    Yes

    The Gigabyte M27Q has a few extra features, including:

    • Game Assist: Adds virtual crosshair, timer, or counter on the screen.
    • OSD Sidekick: Lets you control the monitor's settings with keyboard and mouse.
    • Dashboard: Overlay that displays system information like CPU temperature, usage, frame rate, etc.
    • Black Equalizer: Makes objects more visible in dark scenes.
    • Low Blue Light mode: Blue light filter to reduce eye strain.
    • Picture-in-Picture and Picture-by-Picture: Displays two input signals simultaneously.
    • KVM: Lets you control two devices with the same mouse and keyboard.

    Features
    On-Screen Display (OSD)