Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) Monitor Review

The MSI G274QPF-QD and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are 27-inch gaming monitors. Both have similar overall performance, though the Gigabyte is better in brighter environments, as it gets considerably brighter in SDR. The Gigabyte also has better motion handling, so fast-moving objects look more crisp, making it a better choice for fast-moving games. However, the MSI has a wider HDR color gamut, so it displays more realistic colors with HDR videos and games.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Dell G2724D are both budget-friendly 1440p gaming monitors, with a few differences. The Gigabyte has extra features like a USB hub and KVM switch, making it a great choice if you need something versatile for different computers. However, the Dell has better text clarity due to its subpixel layout, and it's the better choice for gamers, thanks to its faster response time at any refresh rate.

The Gigabyte M27Q P is the newer version of the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and has many of the same features. The main difference is that the P version has an RGB subpixel layout for improved text clarity versus the M27Q (rev. 1.0), and the P model also supports higher DisplayPort 1.4 bandwidth. The performance between the two is similar, with the M27Q (rev. 1.0) getting a bit brighter and having a faster response time at the max refresh rate. On top of that, the M27Q (rev. 1.0) also has a lower input lag at 60Hz.

Overall, the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) performs better than the Gigabyte G27QC. Gaming-wise, the M27Q has a slightly higher 170Hz refresh rate, and its response time is much faster with less overshoot, resulting in clearer images in fast-moving scenes. The M27Q has wider viewing angles for sharing content and playing co-op games, and it gets much brighter to combat glare in well-lit rooms. It also has a much better SDR and HDR color gamut, making it better for content creators. If you often game in the dark, the G27QC might be a better choice because it has a VA panel that can produce deep blacks. Also, while its response time isn't as good as the M27Q's, it's still great and should satisfy most gamers.

The Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very similar. They're both IPS monitors with a 1440p resolution and a 170Hz refresh rate. Gaming-wise, the Acer has better response times, at max refresh rate and 60Hz. It also has significantly better ergonomics because it allows for swivel adjustment and rotation to portrait mode. The Gigabyte has more features, like a USB-C input with DisplayPort Alt Mode and a Picture-in-Picture and Picture-by-Picture mode.

The Gigabyte M27U is a higher-end monitor than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0), so it's the better choice for most gamers. This is because the M27U has a higher 4k resolution, resulting in more detailed images and sharper clarity, and it has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of gaming consoles and modern graphics cards. The M27U also has a faster response time, leading to sharper motion.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Gigabyte M28U are very similar, with a few key differences, so the best one depends on your usage. The M28U has a higher resolution screen, making it a better choice for office use or media creation. The M28U also features two HDMI 2.1 ports, so it's also a better choice for console gamers looking to get the most out of their PS5 or Xbox Series S|X. On the other hand, the M27Q is slightly better for most PC gamers, as it has slightly lower input lag and less overshoot.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is a better budget-friendly gaming monitor than the Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51. The Gigabyte has much better motion handling thanks to its faster response time, and it has a few extra features like a USB hub, including a USB-C port. The Gigabyte is also better for everyday use, like if you want to use it in a well-lit room, as it gets brighter and displays a wider range of more accurate colors. The Samsung has an advantage if you want to use it in a dark room because it has a better contrast ratio. The Samsung also has better ergonomics, making placing it in an ideal position easier.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Dell S2721DGF are very similar overall. Gaming-wise, the Dell has faster response times. Its refresh rate is just a bit lower, 165Hz compared to the Gigabyte's 170Hz; however, this is a small difference that isn't noticeable. It also has significantly better ergonomics, making it easier to position the screen the way you want. On the other hand, the Gigabyte has more features. It includes a USB-C port that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, an integrated KVM switch, and a Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture mode that lets you display two input signals simultaneously, which can be useful for streamers running on two computers.

The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are two excellent gaming monitors with a 1440p resolution. They each have outstanding response time, low input lag, FreeSync support, and G-SYNC compatibility. The MSI has much better ergonomics, making it easy to place the screen how you like. However, the Gigabyte has much better out-of-the-box accuracy, so colors don't look over-saturated like they do on the MSI. It also has Picture-by-Picture/Picture-in-Picture modes, allowing you to display images from two sources at once.

The Gigabyte M27Q X is a bit better than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0). The Q X has a higher native refresh rate, resulting in a faster response time and clearer motion in general. The Q X also has a more standard RGB subpixel layout, resulting in clearer text.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is a bit better than the LG 27GL850-B/27GL83A-B for most uses. Although they have similar response times, the Gigabyte has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz compared to the LG's 144Hz, resulting in a slightly smoother and more responsive gaming experience. Also, the Gigabyte's input lag is much lower at 60Hz than the LG's, making it more ideal for 60fps console gaming. For those in a well-lit room, the LG has better reflection handling, but it doesn't get as bright. The Gigabyte has more productivity features, including a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alt Mode support, an integrated KVM switch, and a Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture mode.

The LG 27GN800-B and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both excellent gaming monitors. Looking past the terrible ergonomics on the LG, they both perform fairly similarly. That said, the Gigabyte has an overclockable refresh rate of 170Hz, higher than the 144Hz max refresh rate of the LG. The Gigabyte also gets brighter in SDR and HDR, and it has one of the widest color gamuts on any monitor we've tested, which is great if you also do color-critical work. Even though its response time isn't quite as fast as the LG's, the Gigabyte offers more versatility thanks to its additional features, including USB 3.0 ports and a USB-C port, as well as a Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture mode. 

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Gigabyte M32Q are very similar overall, but the M32Q is slightly better for most people. The M32Q has better ergonomics, with a stand that can swivel and a wider height adjustment. The M32Q also uses a more standard RGB subpixel structure, whereas the M27Q uses a suboptimal BGR structure, which can cause some text clarity issues in certain apps.

The Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both great monitors with excellent gaming performance. However, they're different. The Samsung is available in a 27-inch and 32-inch size, while the Gigabyte is only available in a 27-inch. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate of 240Hz and a faster response time, resulting in smoother motion and greater responsiveness, although the difference is not that big and might be hard to notice for casual players. The Samsung is better for dark rooms because it has a VA panel with a better contrast ratio, while the Gigabyte has wider viewing angles because it has an IPS panel. The Gigabyte has a few more features, like a USB-C input and KVM, which lets you control two devices with one set of peripherals.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is a much better gaming monitor than the HP X27q. The Gigabyte has a faster response time, especially at lower refresh rates, resulting in much clearer motion with less blur around fast-moving objects. The Gigabyte also has better compatibility with the Xbox Series X and PS5 consoles, as it can display a downscaled 4k image.

The Gigabyte M27Q is available in two versions: the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0). The main difference is that the first version has a BGR subpixel layout, while the second version has an RGB subpixel layout. This results in better text clarity on the second version because computer programs render text better with the RGB subpixel layout. However, besides that, the first version has an advantage in most areas, as it gets brighter and has a faster response time, leading to less motion blur.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50 are both excellent 1440p gaming monitors. They have similar gaming features with exceptional motion handling and low input lag. The Samsung is better for co-op gaming because it has better ergonomics as the stand can swivel. While the models we tested are each 27 inches, the Samsung is also available in a 32-inch size if you prefer something bigger. However, the Gigabyte is better for productivity because it features a USB hub with two USB 3.0 inputs and a USB-C input, which the Samsung doesn't have.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Dell Alienware AW2724DM are similar 1440p gaming monitors. The Dell has a slightly higher 180Hz refresh rate compared to the 170Hz refresh rate on the Gigabyte, and it has better motion handling at higher refresh rates, but the Gigabyte has an optional backlight strobing feature to reduce persistence blur. While they're both excellent for gaming, there are a few differences when it comes to office work, as the Dell has better ergonomics. However, the Gigabyte has more office features like a KVM switch and USB-C port, meaning it's easier to multitask with it.

Although the AOC CQ27G2 and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both 1440p gaming monitors, there are many differences between them. Gaming-wise, the Gigabyte performs better because it has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz and a much faster response time. The Gigabyte has an IPS with wider viewing angles, while the AOC has a VA panel that makes it a better choice for dark rooms. The Gigabyte offers more features, like a USB-C input, HDR support, and a Picture-in-Picture mode. It also gets much brighter to combat glare.

The LG 27GR83Q-B and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both budget-friendly gaming monitors, with a few differences. The LG is a bit higher-end as it has a faster 240Hz refresh rate and supports HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, which the Gigabyte doesn't support. This means that the LG is the better choice for consoles or if you have a modern graphics card. The LG also has better motion handling at high refresh rates and better text clarity. If you want something for work, the Gigabyte has extra features, like a KVM switch and USB-C port.

The Samsung Odyssey G5 C27G55T and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both 1440p gaming monitors, but with different types of panels. The Samsung has a VA panel that's better suited for dark rooms, while the Gigabyte uses an IPS panel with wider viewing angles. As for gaming performance, the Gigabyte performs much better. It has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz and a much faster response time. The Gigabyte supports a wide color gamut for HDR, gets brighter, and offers more features like a USB-C input.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) performs better than the ASUS TUF Gaming VG27WQ1B for most uses. The Gigabyte has a slightly higher refresh rate of 170Hz compared to the ASUS' 165Hz, and its response time is significantly faster, especially in dark scenes. The Gigabyte has an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, making it a better choice for sharing content or playing co-op games, and it gets brighter to combat glare. The ASUS is better suited for dark rooms due to its VA panel's high contrast ratio, but for most gamers, it isn't worth compromising on the Gigabyte's significantly better response time.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better than the ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHD for most uses. The Gigabyte delivers a smoother gaming experience because it has a higher refresh rate and better response time. It also has better ergonomics, gets brighter to combat glare, and offers more features, like HDR support, USB-C input, and a Picture-in-Picture mode.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better than the ASUS TUF VG27VQ for most uses. The Gigabyte has a higher resolution to deliver sharper images and text. It also delivers a better gaming experience due to its much quicker response time. The Gigabyte supports HDR, gets brighter to combat glare, and offers more features, like USB-C input and a built-in KVM switch. It might be worth getting the ASUS if you want better dark room performance because it uses a VA panel with a much better contrast ratio, but its slow response time causes noticeable smearing that may bother some people.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better than the Acer Nitro VG271UP Pbmiipx for most uses. The Gigabyte has a higher refresh rate and faster response time to deliver a clearer image in fast-moving scenes. It also has better ergonomics and gets brighter to fight glare. It has more features, like a USB hub with two USB 3.0s and a USB-C that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM.

The AOC 24G2 and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both excellent gaming monitors but with different specs. The AOC has a 24" screen with a 1080p resolution and a 144Hz refresh rate, while the Gigabyte has a 27" screen with a 1440p resolution and 170Hz refresh rate. The Gigabyte is a more versatile monitor because its larger screen and higher pixel density are better suited for productivity and media consumption. It also has wider viewing angles so that you can share content easily, and it gets brighter to combat glare. The Gigabyte supports HDR and can deliver a relatively decent experience, whereas the AOC doesn't support HDR at all.

The LG 32GP850-B is slightly better than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0). The LG has a slightly faster refresh rate, which translates to a slightly better response time as well. The LG also has better reflection handling, and the stand can rotate to a portrait orientation. The LG has a larger screen but the same resolution as the Gigabyte, so it has slightly worse text clarity, as the pixel density is a bit lower.

The ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very different monitors. The ASUS is designed for productivity and offers significantly better ergonomics. The Gigabyte is primarily a gaming monitor with a much higher refresh rate and faster response time to deliver a better gaming experience. The Gigabyte also has more features, like HDR support, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM switch so that you can control two devices with one set of peripherals. If you plan on only using it for work, it might be better to go with the ASUS because the Gigabyte has a BGR subpixel layout that might cause blurry text in some applications.

The LG 27GN850-B/27GN880-B and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both great 1440p IPS gaming monitors. They perform very similarly gaming-wise; the Gigabyte has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz, but the LG has a better response time. The Gigabyte offers more features, such as a USB-C input that supports DisplayPort and charging, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a KVM. It also has a wider color gamut for HDR and gets much brighter overall.

The Lenovo Legion Y27q-20 and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) have very similar gaming performances, so they mainly differ in features. The Lenovo has better ergonomics because it allows for swivel and pivot adjustments. On the other hand, the Gigabyte gets brighter to combat glare, displays a wider range of colors in HDR, and offers more features, like USB-C input and a Picture-in-Picture mode.

The BenQ EX2780Q and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both 27-inch 1440p gaming monitors. The Gigabyte performs better for the most part. It has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz, a faster response time, and more features, like a USB-C input, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a KVM.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the AOC CU34G2X are very different monitors. The Gigabyte is a 27-inch monitor with a 16:9 aspect ratio, while the AOC is bigger at 34 inches and has a 21:9 aspect ratio for more screen space. They also have different panel types with unique characteristics; the Gigabyte has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles, and the AOC's VA panel has a higher contrast ratio. They each have a high refresh rate and VRR support for gaming, but motion looks smoother on the Gigabyte due to the quicker response time.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) performs better than the BenQ ZOWIE XL2546K for most uses. Although the BenQ has a higher refresh rate and a better response time, it has more motion artifacts in fast-moving scenes than the Gigabyte, which might bother some people. The Gigabyte's larger IPS panel has a higher resolution and provides wider viewing angles than the BenQ's TN panel. It also gets brighter, supports HDR, and offers more features, like USB-C input and a Picture-in-Picture mode.

The ASUS VG279QM and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both excellent gaming monitors; it just depends on your preference. The ASUS has a higher refresh rate of 280Hz versus the Gigabyte's 170Hz, but the Gigabyte has a 1440p resolution, while the ASUS is just 1080p. For most people, the Gigabyte is a better choice because the increase in resolution is more noticeable than the higher refresh rate. However, if you like having a black frame insertion feature, only the ASUS lets you use it simultaneously with VRR. The Gigabyte offers more features, like a USB hub, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better than the Acer Nitro VG271 Pbmiipx for most uses. The Gigabyte has a higher resolution to produce a sharper image and a quicker response time to deliver smoother motion. It supports a wide color gamut for HDR, and it has more extra features, like a Picture-in-Picture mode that lets you display two input signals simultaneously and a built-in KVM switch to control both devices with one set of peripherals. It also has a USB-C input that supports DisplayPort and 10W charging.

The ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both excellent gaming monitors. They have a lot of similar features, including a 170Hz refresh rate and fast response times, and both support VRR to reduce screen tearing. If you're going to be using the monitor for content creation as well, the Gigabyte also offers greater coverage of the Adobe RGB color space, and it includes a USB-C port, allowing for more connectivity options.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better overall than the MSI Optix G27CQ4. The Gigabyte has a slightly higher 170Hz refresh rate compared to 165Hz on the MSI, and they each have a 1440p resolution, but they have different panel types. The Gigabyte has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles, which is great for sharing your screen with others, while the MSI has a VA panel with a better contrast ratio. The Gigabyte also has much quicker response times and supports HDR, which the MSI doesn't. The MSI uses an RGB subpixel layout, which is used in more programs than the BGR subpixel layout on the Gigabyte, so this helps with text clarity.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Samsung Odyssey G5 C34G55T are very different monitors. The Gigabyte has a 27-inch IPS panel with a 16:9 aspect ratio, while the Samsung has a 34-inch VA panel with a 21:9 aspect ratio. For the most part, the Gigabyte performs better. It has a faster response time that results in a clearer image with less smearing behind fast-moving objects. It also has wider viewing angles, gets brighter, and offers more features, like USB-C input. The Samsung is better for dark rooms because it can produce deeper blacks, and its wider format might feel more immersive for some people.

The ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are meant for different purposes. While the Gigabyte is a gaming monitor, the ASUS is meant for content creation and multimedia. That said, the Gigabyte has an exceptionally wide color gamut, and it supports HDR, making it well-suited to photo and video editing. It also outperforms the ASUS when it comes to gaming, with a much higher refresh rate and faster response time. If gaming is less important to you, the ASUS may be a little more suited to an office setting, as it has more ergonomics adjustment options and wider viewing angles. 

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is much better than the MSI Optix G272. The Gigabyte has a higher native resolution, resulting in a higher pixel density and better text clarity. The Gigabyte also has better ergonomics and better viewing angles, and it supports HDR. Although the Gigabyte has a higher refresh rate, the response time is similar to the MSI. On the other hand, the MSI has much better reflection handling, but it's not quite as bright as the Gigabyte.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is a much better monitor than the LG 32GN600-B for most people. The Gigabyte has wider viewing angles and better ergonomics, so it's a bit more versatile. The Gigabyte is also much better for gaming, with a significantly faster response time, especially at 60Hz. On the other hand, the LG is better for a dark room, as it has better contrast and better black uniformity.

The Gigabyte M32U is a bit better than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0). The M32U has a larger, higher-resolution screen, resulting in much better text clarity, and it has better ergonomics. The M32U also has two HDMI 2.1 ports, making it a better choice for Sony PS5 or Xbox Series S|X gamers.

The Gigabyte G32QC and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) look physically similar, but they perform differently. The M27Q performs better for gaming because it has a higher refresh rate and a much faster response time. It has more features, like a USB-C input and an integrated KVM switch. However, if you like gaming in the dark, the G32QC is a better choice because it uses a VA panel with a much higher contrast ratio to produce deep blacks.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better than the ASUS VG279Q for most uses. The Gigabyte has a higher resolution to deliver a sharper image, and it also has better motion handling due to its higher refresh rate and faster response time. It offers more features, like HDR support, USB-C input, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM.

The ASUS TUF VG32VQ and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both high-refresh gaming monitors, but the ASUS has a 32-inch VA panel, while the Gigabyte has a 27-inch IPS panel. The Gigabyte performs better gaming-wise because it has a faster response time and higher refresh rate. The Gigabyte also offers more features, like USB-C input, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM switch.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better than the MSI Optix MAG271CQR for most uses. The Gigabyte has a better response time, especially in dark transitions, so it doesn't have the dark smearing present on the MSI. It has a higher refresh rate too, but it's only a slight increase and isn't really noticeable to most people. The Gigabyte has wider viewing angles, supports HDR, and offers more extra features, like a Picture-in-Picture mode and USB-C input. However, the MSI is better suited for dark rooms because it has a much higher contrast ratio to produce deeper blacks.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Acer Predator XB273U GXbmiipruzx are excellent gaming monitors that stand out due to their exceptionally wide color gamuts. They also both have incredibly fast response times and low input lag. The biggest difference is that the Acer has a higher refresh rate of 270Hz versus the 170Hz on the Gigabyte.

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very different. The ASUS is a 24" model with a 1080p resolution, while the Gigabyte is a 27" with a 1440p resolution. The latter's larger screen size and higher resolution make it more versatile and better suited for work and media consumption. Gaming-wise, the ASUS has better response times, which results in less blur trail behind fast-moving objects. The Gigabyte supports HDR and has a much wider color gamut, and it also gets a lot brighter to combat glare. It also has more features, like a Picture-in-Picture mode and a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alt Mode.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better than the Dell S2722DGM for most uses. The Gigabyte has a better response time to deliver a clearer image in fast-moving scenes. It has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles, a wider color gamut, and more features, like USB ports, HDR support, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM switch. That said, the Dell might be worth it if you like gaming in the dark because it uses a VA panel that can produce much deeper blacks.

The LG 27GP950-B is a bit better than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) for most uses. The LG has a higher resolution screen and much better text clarity, so it's a bit better for media creators or office use. The LG also has two HDMI 2.1 ports, making it a better choice for PS5 or Xbox Series X gamers. On the other hand, the Gigabyte has better reflection handling and an optional backlight strobing feature.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM are both excellent gaming monitors, but they have very different configurations. The ASUS delivers a smoother and more responsive gaming experience because it has a higher refresh rate and faster response time. However, the Gigabyte has a larger, higher-resolution screen to provide greater immersion and more screen space for work and media consumption. The ASUS allows for more ergonomic adjustments, including swivel and pivot, which the Gigabyte lacks.

The Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very similar. The M27Q performs better for gaming because it has a faster response time, especially at 60Hz. It also has a USB-C input that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode and 10W charging. However, the FI27Q has much better ergonomics because it allows for swivel and pivot.

The LG 34GP83A-B and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both great monitors that deliver similar gaming performances. The main difference is that the LG is an ultrawide with a 21:9 aspect ratio, while the Gigabyte has a standard 16:9 format. The Gigabyte has wider viewing angles, gets brighter, and offers more features, like USB-C input and a built-in KVM.

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very different gaming monitors, so you should go with the one that best suits your needs. At 25 inches, the ASUS is smaller than the 27-inch Gigabyte, and it uses a TN panel with a 1080p resolution. The Gigabyte has an IPS panel, so it has much better viewing angles than the ASUS. The Gigabyte's 1440p resolution also delivers a sharper image. While the ASUS has a higher refresh rate and a slightly faster response time at max, the Gigabyte has a faster response time at 60Hz, so it may be the better option for console gaming.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Gigabyte M34WQ deliver similar performance overall but have a different form factor. The Gigabyte M27Q has a slightly faster refresh rate and a bit better motion handling. The M34WQ has an ultrawide aspect ratio that's better for productivity, and it delivers a more immersive gaming experience. The increased resolution requires a more powerful graphics card, though, so if your PC can't maintain high frame rates with a 16x9 aspect ratio, it'll be even worse with an ultrawide.

The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both great budget monitors with similar gaming performance. The Gigabyte has a larger screen and higher resolution, and it also includes more features, like USB-C input, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM.

The LG 27GN750-B and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both great gaming monitors, so it comes down to whether you want a higher refresh rate or a higher resolution. The LG provides a smoother and more responsive gaming experience, but the difference isn't huge and less noticeable than the Gigabyte's higher resolution, which results in a much sharper image. The Gigabyte gets brighter to combat glare and has more features, like USB-C input, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM switch.

The Gigabyte G34WQC and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very different monitors. The G34WQC is an ultrawide monitor with a 21:9 aspect ratio, and it uses a VA panel, whereas the M27Q has a standard 16:9 aspect ratio and uses an IPS panel. The M27Q performs better for gaming because it has a higher refresh rate and faster response time. It can display a wide range of colors in HDR, and it offers more features, like a built-in KVM switch and a USB hub with USB-C input. On the other hand, the G34WQC is better suited for dark rooms, and its wider screen feels more immersive.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the LG 32GN650-B/32GN63T-B are very different. The Gigabyte has a 27-inch IPS screen with wider viewing angles, while the LG has a 32-inch VA panel that produces deeper blacks for a better dark room viewing experience. The Gigabyte performs better gaming-wise because it has a much faster response time to deliver a clearer image in fast-moving scenes. It also gets brighter and offers more features, like a USB hub with USB-C input, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a KVM switch.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better overall than the MSI Optix G273QF because it has many more features. The Gigabyte supports HDR, has Picture-by-Picture and Picture-in-Picture modes, and has a USB hub that allows you to connect your keyboard and mouse to the monitor. In terms of gaming performance, both monitors are similar with a quick response time, low input lag, and a high refresh rate.

The Dell S3422DWG and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) use different panel technologies, each with strengths and weaknesses. The Dell has a VA panel with much better black uniformity and better contrast. The IPS panel on the Gigabyte has much better viewing angles and a faster response time, resulting in clearer motion with less blur behind fast-moving objects.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9/G95NA S49AG95 are very different types of monitors. The Gigabyte is a 27-inch 1440p monitor, while the Samsung is a 49-inch, 5120x1440 display, which is the equivalent of placing two of the Gigabytes side by side. The Gigabyte also has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles, and the Samsung has a VA panel with much better contrast. The Samsung features Mini LED backlighting, meaning it gets much brighter, and it has a good full-array local dimming feature. However, motion looks much smoother on the Gigabyte because there's less overshoot.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is much better for gaming than the Samsung Odyssey G3 S24AG30, but they're different types of monitors. The Gigabyte has a 1440p resolution with an IPS panel that has wide viewing angles, while the Samsung has a 1080p resolution and the VA panel has higher contrast. The Gigabyte is more versatile because it gets brighter, has much better motion handling, and supports HDR, but the HDR support doesn't add much because it lacks local dimming. The Gigabyte also has a few more features like a USB-C input and two USB 3.0 inputs, which the Samsung doesn't have.

The Dell S2722QC and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both great office monitors. They each offer productivity features like USB-C inputs and Picture-in-Picture and Picture-by-Picture modes, but the Gigabyte has a KVM switch that allows you to control two sources with one keyboard and mouse. The S2722QC delivers sharper text thanks to its higher 4k resolution, and it uses a typical RGB subpixel layout, so there aren't any issues like with the BGR subpixel layout on the Gigabyte. However, the Gigabyte is more versatile for gaming because it has a much higher 170Hz refresh rate, and it also has a DisplayPort input which the Dell lacks.

The Acer Nitro XV252Q Fbmiiprx is slightly better for gaming than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0). The Acer has a much faster refresh rate and a faster response time, resulting in noticeably clearer motion with no blur behind fast-moving objects. The Acer has much better ergonomics, so it's easier to adjust to your ideal viewing position. The Gigabyte has a higher native resolution, which makes it easier to multitask and delivers a more immersive gaming experience.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) performs better than the LG 27GL650F-B for most uses. The Gigabyte has a higher resolution to produce a sharper image, and it also delivers a smoother gaming experience due to its higher refresh rate and faster response time. It also has more features, like USB-C input, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM switch.

The LG 27UK650-W and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very different monitors. The LG is a 4k productivity monitor with a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Gigabyte is a 1440p model with a 170Hz refresh rate. If you only use it for work, the LG is a better choice because its higher pixel density means you get better text clarity. For gaming, the Gigabyte performs much better because it has a faster response time and higher refresh rate.

The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both great gaming monitors with excellent gaming performance. The biggest difference is that the Gigabyte is a native FreeSync monitor with G-SYNC compatibility, while the ASUS is a native G-SYNC monitor and doesn't support FreeSync. The ASUS has better ergonomics, but the Gigabyte has more features, like HDR support and USB-C input.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Acer Predator X25 bmiiprzx are amazing monitors, but they're also very different. The Gigabyte is a bit larger at 27 inches, with a 170Hz refresh rate and higher 1440p resolution. Meanwhile, the Acer is 25 inches and is limited to 1080p, but it has an incredible 360Hz refresh rate aimed at competitive gamers. They have very similar response times and very little input lag, but the Gigabyte has a significantly wider color gamut.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better than the LG 27GN650-B overall. The Gigabyte has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz compared to the LG's 144Hz, and it has a 1440p resolution, whereas the LG is 1080p. The Gigabyte also has a wider color gamut, significantly higher peak brightness, and more features like a USB-C input, an integrated KVM, and a Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture mode. The LG has a slightly better response time at max refresh rate, but it's slower than the Gigabyte at 60Hz.

The Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both excellent gaming monitors with similar features. The FI27Q-X has a higher 240Hz refresh rate than the 170Hz on the M27Q, but they each have quick response times. The FI27Q-X has much better ergonomics as you can swivel it and rotate it into portrait mode. On the other hand, the M27Q has a USB-C input, which the FI27Q-X doesn't have, so you can display an image from a compatible device and charge it at the same time.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Dell S3222DGM use different panel technologies, each with strengths and weaknesses, but overall, the Gigabyte is a much better monitor. The Gigabyte has much better viewing angles, supports HDR, and has a faster response time. The Dell looks better in a dark room, as it has much better contrast and better black uniformity.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the LG 34GP950G-B are pretty similar overall, but there are some design differences that may make one better than the other depending on your personal preferences. The LG has an ultrawide curved screen, which delivers a more immersive gaming experience. The LG also has a slightly faster response time, and it's a native G-SYNC monitor. The Gigabyte, on the other hand, has a flat 16:9 display, which some content creators might prefer, and it has an optional black frame insertion feature.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70 are both excellent for gaming, but they're different types of monitors. The Gigabyte has a 1440p resolution with a 170Hz refresh rate, while the Samsung has a 4k resolution with a 144Hz refresh, and it has HDMI 2.1 inputs that make it a good choice for console gaming. The Gigabyte has better motion handling at 60Hz because there's more overshoot on the Samsung. The Gigabyte also has more productivity options like a USB-C input, and it gets brighter, but the Samsung has better ergonomics because you can swivel it.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Acer Nitro XV340CK Pbmiipphzx are both great gaming monitors. However, they're also quite different. The Gigabyte is a 27-inch, 16:9 model, while the Acer is a 34-inch ultrawide with a 21:9 aspect ratio. The Gigabyte performs better gaming-wise because it has a better response time. It also has better build quality, has wider viewing angles, and gets brighter to combat glare. The Gigabyte has a much wider color gamut, with near-full Adobe RGB coverage, making it a better choice for content creation. Lastly, it has more features than the Acer, like USB-C input and a built-in KVM switch. 

The LG 34GN850-B and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) have different aspect ratios. The LG is an ultrawide, while the Gigabyte has a standard 16:9 format. Gaming-wise, even though the Gigabyte has a slightly higher refresh rate, the LG has a faster response time at max refresh rate to deliver a clearer image in fast-moving scenes. However, if you often game at 60Hz, then the Gigabyte comes out ahead. The Gigabyte also has wider viewing angles, higher screen brightness, and more features, like USB-C input and a built-in KVM.

The LG 27GN950-B and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both great gaming monitors. The LG has a higher resolution than the Gigabyte, but the difference in sharpness might not be noticeable for most people at typical viewing distances. Gaming-wise, they're very similar; the Gigabyte has a slightly higher refresh rate, but the LG has a better response time. The Gigabyte has more features, like USB-C input, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM switch.

The Dell Alienware AW2521H has a better response time and higher refresh rate than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0), but the difference might not be noticeable to casual players. The Gigabyte has a larger screen and higher resolution, and it offers more features, like USB-C input and a Picture-in-Picture mode. The Dell has native G-SYNC support, while the Gigabyte has native FreeSync support and G-SYNC compatibility.

The ViewSonic Elite XG270QG and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) perform very similarly gaming-wise. The main difference is that the ViewSonic is a native G-SYNC monitor with FreeSync compatibility, while the Gigabyte is a native FreeSync monitor with G-SYNC compatibility. The Gigabyte supports HDR, gets brighter, and has more extra features, like a Picture-in-Picture mode, a built-in KVM switch, and a USB-C port that supports DisplayPort and 10W charging.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is much better than the Acer Predator XB271HU Bmiprz. The Gigabyte has a significantly faster response time, which results in less ghosting behind fast-moving objects. It has better color accuracy, gets brighter, and offers more extra features, like a USB hub with a USB-C port, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM. It also supports HDR, which the Acer doesn't. The Gigabyte has both native FreeSync support and G-SYNC compatibility, whereas the Acer only supports G-SYNC.

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very different monitors. The ASUS is a 34-inch ultrawide with a VA panel, while the Gigabyte is a 27-inch, 16:9 monitor with an IPS panel. The Gigabyte is better for gaming because it has a slightly higher refresh rate and faster response times. It also has wider viewing angles and more features, like a USB-C port, an integrated KVM, and a Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture mode. The ASUS might be a better choice if you often game in the dark or want a better HDR experience because it has a much higher contrast ratio and gets brighter in HDR.

The Acer Nitro XV282K KVbmiipruzx and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are excellent gaming monitors, but they have a few differences. The Acer is a 4k monitor with a 144Hz max refresh rate, while the Gigabyte is 1440p and has a higher 170Hz refresh rate. The Acer has significantly better ergonomics as you can swivel it and use it in portrait mode. On the other hand, the Gigabyte gets brighter, making it a better choice for well-lit rooms, and its response time at 60Hz is quicker, so motion looks smoother.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the MSI Optix MAG161V are designed for different uses, so they're not really directly comparable. The MSI is a portable monitor with a 16-inch 1080p screen. The MSI is designed for productivity on the go, giving a bit of extra screen space to work with when connected to a laptop or other portable device. The Gigabyte is a desktop gaming monitor with a 27-inch 1440p screen. The Gigabyte delivers a much better experience overall but isn't portable.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the ASUS ProArt PA148CTV are very different types of monitors, so the results aren't really comparable. The Gigabyte is a desktop gaming monitor with a high refresh rate, fast response time, and low input lag. The ASUS is a portable monitor designed for portable productivity. The ASUS is much smaller, with very limited features and a 60Hz refresh rate.

The Gigabyte AORUS FI32U is slightly better than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) overall. The FI32U has better ergonomics and a higher resolution screen, and it supports HDMI 2.1, making it a better choice for next-gen console gamers. The M27Q, on the other hand, has a better horizontal viewing angle and much lower input lag when gaming at 60Hz.

The Gigabyte AORUS FO48U OLED and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both excellent gaming monitors, but they're very different, and the best one depends on your needs and usage. The FO48U is a very large monitor with an OLED screen, which delivers perfect blacks, wide viewing angles, and a nearly instantaneous response time. Unfortunately, the FO48U has a chance of permanent burn-in, which can be an issue when used as a desktop monitor. If you want a standard desktop monitor with no risk of burn-in, the M27Q is a safer choice.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is significantly better than the Lenovo D27-30. The Gigabyte has a higher native resolution, resulting in a sharper image and better text clarity. The Gigabyte supports HDR, has wider viewing angles, and is brighter. The Gigabyte also has a faster refresh rate and significantly better motion handling.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHPE are two very different displays that target different uses. The Gigabyte is a desktop monitor with a high-resolution screen and a fast refresh rate. The ASUS is a 16-inch portable monitor with a lower native resolution. The Gigabyte supports HDR, and it's a lot brighter.

The ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very similar in terms of gaming performance. The differences are in the features. The ASUS offers better ergonomics, and its black frame insertion feature is usable simultaneously with VRR to improve motion clarity. On the other hand, the Gigabyte has a USB-C input that supports DisplayPort and 10W charging, as well as a Picture-in-Picture mode and built-in KVM switch.

The Dell UltraSharp U2720Q and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are monitors designed for different uses. The Dell is a 4k model that's better suited for productivity because it delivers sharper text and has better ergonomics. Also, its USB-C port has a much higher power output to charge laptops, whereas the Gigabyte's USB-C is limited to 10W. On the other hand, the Gigabyte is a much better gaming monitor because it has a higher refresh rate, a significantly better response time, and VRR support to reduce screen tearing.

The ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQ and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both great gaming monitors. The Gigabyte performs a bit better than the ASUS gaming-wise because it has a faster response time and refresh rate. The ASUS has a higher 4k resolution to deliver a sharper image, but it requires high-end hardware with a GPU that supports Display Stream Compression to achieve high frame rates at 4k.

The Dell Alienware AW2521HF and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are both great gaming monitors, but they're also very different. The Dell has a smaller 25-inch screen and a 1080p resolution, while the Gigabyte has a 27-inch screen with a 1440p resolution. The Dell has a higher refresh rate and better response time, but the difference might not be noticeable to casual gamers. The Gigabyte has more features, like HDR support, USB-C input, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM switch.

The LG 32UL500-W and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very different types of monitors. The LG is a 32-inch, 4k model designed for everyday productivity, while the Gigabyte is a 27-inch, 1440p gaming monitor. The Gigabyte performs better for the most part. It has better motion handling to deliver a smoother gaming experience, as well as more features, like USB ports, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a built-in KVM switch. It also has wider viewing angles and gets brighter to combat glare. However, it doesn't perform as well as the LG in dark rooms because it has a low contrast ratio that makes blacks appear gray.

The BenQ EW3270U and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very different monitors. The BenQ is a 32-inch, 4k model designed for everyday productivity, while the Gigabyte is a 27-inch, 1440p gaming monitor. The Gigabyte offers better quality-of-life features, such as better ergonomics, higher screen brightness to fight glare, and USB ports. It also provides a more responsive desktop experience due to its high refresh rate and fast response time. On the other hand, the BenQ offers more screen real estate for work, better text clarity, as well as a higher contrast ratio to produce deeper blacks.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is better than the Dell S3220DGF for most uses. The Gigabyte has a much better response time to deliver a clearer image in fast-moving scenes. It also has wider viewing angles, gets brighter to fight glare, and offers more features, like USB-C input and a built-in KVM switch. The Dell has a bigger screen, but it has the same 1440p resolution, so images and text don't appear as sharp as on the Gigabyte because it has a lower pixel density. That said, the Dell might be a good choice if you want better dark room performance because it uses a VA panel with a much better contrast ratio.

The Dell Alienware AW2721D and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) perform similarly overall. They're both great 27-inch 1440p gaming monitors, but the Dell feels noticeably better built and offers more adjustment options. The Dell also has a higher refresh rate, gets brighter in HDR, and has a faster response time, although there's less overshoot with the Gigabyte. That said, the Gigabyte may represent a better value to some people.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Dell Alienware AW3821DW are both great gaming monitors, but they're also quite different. The Gigabyte is a 27-inch model with a 16:9 aspect ratio, while the Dell is a 38-inch ultrawide with a 21:9 aspect ratio. The Gigabyte provides smoother gameplay because it has a higher refresh rate and a quicker response time. However, the Dell is a good choice if you want better immersion. It also gets brighter to deliver a better HDR experience.

The LG 38GN950-B and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are quite different. The LG is an ultrawide monitor with a 21:9 aspect ratio, while the Gigabyte is a standard 16:9 model. This means that the LG provides more horizontal screen space, making it feel more immersive in games. Although the LG has an unconventional 3840x1600 resolution, it's about the same pixel density as the Gigabyte, so images and text look just as sharp. The LG has a lower refresh rate of 160Hz compared to the Gigabyte's 170Hz, but its response time is slightly quicker. If you want to game in HDR, the LG delivers a better experience because it has a wider color gamut and gets a lot brighter. It has local dimming, which the Gigabyte lacks, but it's edge-lit and performs terribly. The Gigabyte has more features, like a USB-C port and an integrated KVM.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Dell UltraSharp U4021QW are two very different monitors, each with a lot to offer but in different ways. The Gigabyte is a great gaming monitor, with a higher refresh rate, faster response times, and VRR support. The Dell is an ultrawide office monitor with an exceptionally high 5k resolution but has fewer extra features. The Dell doesn't have VRR or HDR support, but it is a good choice if you need a large monitor with an exceptional resolution.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is a much better monitor than the MSI Optix G27C6, but there are some noticeable differences between each. The Gigabyte is a 1440p monitor with HDR support, while the MSI is limited to 1080p and doesn't support HDR. The Gigabyte has much quicker response times for smoother motion, and its IPS panel has wider viewing angles. However, the MSI has a VA panel with a better contrast ratio, so blacks appear deeper when viewed in the dark.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Lenovo ThinkVision M14 are two very different monitors. The Gigabyte is designed for gaming, while the Lenovo is a portable monitor. The Gigabyte has a higher 1440p resolution and 170Hz refresh rate, and it has a much larger screen. The Gigabyte has more gaming features like VRR support and extremely quick response times. The Lenovo has a 1080p resolution, but because it has a smaller screen, it has a higher pixel density that results in clearer text. Since it's a portable monitor, it's much lighter.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is significantly better than the ASUS VG246H. The Gigabyte has a larger, higher-resolution screen, making it a better choice for multitasking or a more immersive gaming experience. The Gigabyte supports HDR and has significantly better response times and a higher refresh rate, so motion looks much clearer. On the other hand, the ASUS has much better ergonomics and better reflection handling.

The ASUS ZenScreen MB14AC and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are designed for different uses. The ASUS is a 14" portable monitor with a 1080p resolution and 60Hz refresh rate, and the Gigabyte is a 27" gaming monitor with a 1440p resolution and 170Hz refresh rate. For the most part, the Gigabyte is a better choice unless you need portability. It has a bigger screen, better performance, and many more features. The ASUS is best suited for displaying text documents because it has a narrow color gamut that makes the image look washed out, which isn't ideal for content creation, and its bad response times make it a mediocre choice for gaming.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the LG 48 C1 OLED are both excellent for gaming, but they're different types of displays. The LG is a 48-inch TV we tested as a monitor, and it uses an OLED panel. This allows it to display a near-infinite contrast ratio with perfect black levels, and it has HDMI 2.1 inputs, allowing you to play 4k games up to 120fps over an HDMI connection. On the other hand, the Gigabyte is a typical monitor with a smaller screen and 1440p resolution, meaning it has better text clarity. It gets significantly brighter, and LED panels don't risk permanent burn-in like OLEDs.

These two monitors are very different, but unless you need a portable gaming monitor, the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is much better than the ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPE. The Gigabyte's larger, higher-resolution screen is better for multitasking and delivers a more immersive gaming experience. On the other hand, the ASUS has slightly faster response times, but it's not a very noticeable difference. The ASUS is also much more portable, designed to be carried in a laptop bag or backpack, and it even has a 7800mAh battery built-in.

The ASUS ZenScreen Go MB16AHP and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very different monitors. The ASUS is a compact portable display with a 14" screen, while the Gigabyte is a desktop gaming monitor. Unless you need the portability of the ASUS, the Gigabyte is a better choice for most uses.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the ASUS ZenScreen Touch MB16AMT are different monitors, each with pros and cons. The Gigabyte is a standard 27-inch monitor with a stand, while the ASUS is a smaller, portable monitor. The Gigabyte has a ton more features like HDR support, VRR support, a 170Hz refresh rate, and more inputs; it also has a quicker response time, gets brighter, and a wider SDR color gamut. Though the ASUS is smaller and has a lower resolution, it has a higher pixel density that results in clearer text, and it's easier to carry around.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the MSI Oculux NXG253R are very similar overall, with a few design differences. The Gigabyte has a larger screen, and it delivers a better HDR experience, with a better color gamut and higher peak brightness. The Gigabyte is also more accurate out of the box. The MSI has better ergonomics and a faster refresh rate, but the response time performance is about the same.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Razer Raptor 27 165Hz are both great 1440p, 27-inch monitors. Motion looks smoother on the Gigabyte because it has a slightly higher 170Hz refresh rate and a quicker response time, especially at 60Hz. The Gigabyte is better for content creators because it has even better coverage of the Adobe RGB color space and has better out-of-the-box accuracy, but this can vary between units. Even though the Razer doesn't get as bright, it's still a better choice for use in well-lit rooms because it has better reflection handling.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Samsung C27RG5 use different panel technologies, each with their own strengths and weaknesses, but the Gigabyte is much better overall. The Gigabyte has better ergonomics, better viewing angles, and a higher native resolution, and it supports HDR. The Gigabyte also has a much better response time, an optional black frame insertion feature, and lower input lag at 60Hz.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Gigabyte AORUS FV43U are two very different displays that target different users, so the best one depends on your needs. The FV43U is more like a small TV than a monitor, with a large 43-inch screen and a fixed stand. The FV43U has a VA panel with deep uniform blacks. The M27Q has an IPS panel with wide viewing angles but worse contrast. The M27Q also has a faster response time at 60Hz.

Other than the difference in size, the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are pretty similar overall. The Gigabyte has a slightly faster maximum refresh rate, and the smaller screen size results in slightly better text clarity. On the other hand, the Corsair has slightly better ergonomics and a slightly faster response time at the max refresh rate.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is much better than the Dell S2421H. The Gigabyte has a larger, higher-resolution screen, with a faster refresh rate, much faster response time, and better ergonomics. The Gigabyte has lower input lag and better viewing angles, and it supports HDR.

The ASUS VG248QG and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are different types of gaming monitors, but the M27Q is much more versatile. The Gigabyte has a 27-inch IPS panel with a 1440p resolution, and it has wide viewing angles, while the ASUS has a 24-inch screen with a 1080p resolution and a TN panel. The Gigabyte supports HDR and has a better selection of inputs, including two USB 3.0 inputs and a USB-C input, none of which the ASUS has. They each have a quick response time at their max refresh rate, while the Gigabyte has a slightly faster response time at 60Hz. The ASUS has a few advantages, like much better reflection handling and much better ergonomics.

The Dell C1422H and the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) are very different monitors with different target audiences. The Gigabyte is a full-size desktop monitor with a high-resolution screen and a fast refresh rate. The Gigabyte delivers much better gaming performance, with a significantly faster response time and FreeSync support. The Dell is a compact portable monitor designed for increased productivity on the go.

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the HP OMEN 27c are different types of monitors. The Gigabyte is more versatile for different uses than the HP because it has wider viewing angles if you need to share your screen, and it gets brighter. Motion also looks much better on the Gigabyte, thanks to the quick response time. Both have USB-C inputs, but the one on the Gigabyte supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, while the one on the HP is only a service port. On the other hand, the HP is a better choice for high-frame-rate gaming because it has a 240Hz refresh rate, and its VA panel has a higher contrast ratio.