BenQ ZOWIE EC2 Mouse Review

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the BenQ ZOWIE FK2-B are wired gaming mice with similar performance but different shapes and sizes. The EC2 has an ergonomic shape for right-handed users. It's well-suited to all grip types, but those with smaller hands may not be able to reach all the buttons using a claw or fingertip grip. On the other hand, the FK2-B has an ambidextrous design with a low profile. It's well-suited for all grip types and nearly all hand sizes, though those with smaller hands may not be able to reach all buttons with a fingertip grip.

The BenQ ZOWIE S2 is a better gaming mouse than the BenQ ZOWIE EC2. The S2 feels better built, and its feet glide better since it has no sharp edges. Also, its sensor is more consistent than the EC2. However, the EC2 feels more comfortable, its cable is more flexible, and its click latency is marginally lower.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 is an older, medium-sized version in the BenQ ZOWIE EC-series, while the BenQ ZOWIE EC1-C is a newer, large-sized version with several improvements. The EC1-C is somewhat lighter and feels much better built. It also has a more flexible cable, better quality mouse feet with rounded edges, and a lower minimum lift-off distance. Both mice are suitable for all grip types, but the EC2 is recommended for small hands using a palm grip, while the EC1-C isn't.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC1 and the BenQ ZOWIE EC2 are very similar gaming mice with right-handed ergonomic shapes but different sizes. The EC1 is the larger of the two. It feels sturdier, has feet with rounded edges, and a more flexible cable. It's suitable for all grip types, but those with medium hands may not reach all buttons using a fingertip grip, and it isn't suitable for small hands, regardless of grip type. On the other hand, the EC2 is slightly lighter and is well-suited for all hand sizes using a palm grip. However, those with small hands likely won't be able to comfortably reach all buttons using a claw grip, and those with medium or small hands may not be able to reach all buttons using a fingertip grip.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the BenQ ZOWIE FK1+-B are wired gaming mice with similar performance but different shapes and sizes. The EC2 has an ergonomic right-handed design. On the other hand, the FK1+-B has an ambidextrous low-profile shape with less palm support. Both mice are well-suited for larger hands, but the EC2 is suitable for a palm grip, regardless of hand size.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the BenQ ZOWIE FK1-B are very similar wired gaming mice with comparable performance but different shapes. The ZOWIE EC2 has a right-slanted ergonomic shape and a more flexible cable. On the other hand, the FK1-B has a low-profile, symmetrical shape, a sturdier-feeling build, and mouse feet with rounded edges. Both mice are very well suited for palm and claw grips, but only those with large hands will likely find a fingertip grip comfortable.

The Anker Gaming Mouse is better than the BenQ ZOWIE EC2. The Anker feels better built and has a wider CPI range, and it comes with software that lets you reprogram its buttons and customize its settings. However, the BenQ is better suited for larger hands than the Anker is, and its click latency is much lower.

The Pulsar Xlite V2 and the BenQ ZOWIE EC2 are gaming mice with very similar shapes but are otherwise quite different. The Pulsar is a wireless model that's much lighter with significantly better sensor performance and click latency. It also feels sturdier overall. Its body has perforated pill-shaped cutouts and a very minimal baseplate design to reduce overall weight. On the other hand, the BenQ has a solid plastic shell.

The Fnatic FLICK 2 and the BenQ ZOWIE EC2 are both good wired gaming mice. The Fnatic feels sturdier and has a more flexible cable. It also has a wider CPI range, and you can adjust the CPI by increments of 100, while you can only cycle between four preset CPI settings on the BenQ. The Fnatic also has customization software, which the BenQ lacks. On the other hand, the BenQ is marginally lighter and has mouse feet that glide smoother, though they have sharp edges. The BenQ also has significantly lower click latency.

The Logitech G403 HERO is better than the BenQ ZOWIE EC2. The Logitech feels better built, has a wider and more customizable CPI range, and its click latency is slightly lower. Also, unlike the BenQ, the Logitech's logo and scroll wheel have RGB zones, and it comes with outstanding software to customize the buttons and sensor settings. However, the BenQ's mouse feet glide better than the Logitech.

The Razer DeathAdder Elite is better than the BenQ ZOWIE EC2. The Razer feels better built, more comfortable, and has RGB lighting on its scroll wheel and logo. Also, the Razer has a much wider CPI range that you can adjust very precisely, and it comes with software for customizations. However, the BenQ has a lower click latency.

The SteelSeries Prime Mini Wireless is an impressive wireless gaming mouse, while the BenQ ZOWIE EC2 is a very good wired gaming mouse. The SteelSeries is lighter and feels sturdier. It also has mouse feet that glide more smoothly and, despite being a wireless mouse, has a more flexible charging cable. Performance-wise, it has a much wider CPI range and a lower lift-off distance. It also has customization software compatible with Windows and macOS, which the BenQ lacks. On the other hand, the BenQ has a more consistent sensor and somewhat lower click latency, but it only has four default CPI presets.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the SteelSeries Prime Mini are wired gaming mice with similar shapes, but the SteelSeries has better overall performance. The SteelSeries is significantly lighter and feels sturdier. It also has a more flexible cable and better quality mouse feet. Performance-wise, it has a lower lift-off distance and a much wider CPI range. You can also precisely adjust the CPI by increments of 50, while you can only choose between four preset CPI settings on the BenQ. Additionally, the SteelSeries has customization software, which the BenQ lacks. On the other hand, the BenQ has a more consistent sensor.

The Vaxee ZYGEN NP-01S and the BenQ ZOWIE EC2 have similar, straightforward shapes with no RGB lighting. Neither comes with customization software to reprogram the keys or adjust the settings, and you can only cycle through four CPI presets and three polling rates. However, you can also cycle between three debounce times on the Vaxee, and it also has a lower minimum lift-off distance and smoother-gliding mouse feet than the BenQ.

The Vaxee OUTSET AX and the BenQ ZOWIE EC2 are wired gaming mice with similar designs, but the Vaxee is a better mouse overall. The Vaxee has a significantly sturdier-feeling build quality, it's lighter, it's slightly taller and wider, and it has textured surfaces on the L/R click buttons. It also has better cable and mouse feet, lower click latency, and a lower lift-off distance. Both mice lack companion software, and they only have four default onboard CPI settings.

The Pwnage Ultra Custom Wireless Ergo and the BenQ ZOWIE EC2 are nearly identical in size and shape, but the Pwnage is a better gaming mouse overall. The BenQ is a wired-only mouse. On the other hand, the Pwnage is significantly lighter, and you can connect it with its charging cable or wirelessly with its USB receiver. The Pwnage also includes several modular pieces that you can use to alter the look and feel of the mouse. Additionally, it has mouse feet that glide more smoothly, a wider CPI range, an adjustable CPI, a lower lift-off distance, and customization software, which the BenQ lacks.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the Sharkoon Light² 200 have a very similar shape that's best suited for a palm or claw grip for most hand sizes. The Sharkoon has a honeycomb cutout design on its sides and palm rest that makes it much lighter, and it also comes with an alternate solid palm rest if you prefer. Also, it has a lower lift-off distance and a wider CPI range with a CPI that you can adjust in precise increments. You can reprogram all the buttons using the dedicated software, and the CPI switching button is on the top of the mouse instead of on the underside like the BenQ, making it easier to adjust your CPI mid-game. The BenQ has a more straightforward design with no RGB or customization software and has much lower click latency.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the Gigabyte AORUS M5 are both wired gaming mice. The BenQ has lower click latency and a more consistent sensor, and it weighs much less. On the other hand, the Gigabyte feels better built, and it comes with customization software, which some people may prefer. It has an adjustable CPI within a much wider range, programmable buttons, and five 2.5g weights to adjust the weight and its distribution. Both mice are suitable with any grip type for most hand sizes, but people with medium hands using a fingertip grip may feel more comfortable with the Gigabyte.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the EVGA X17 are both good, wired gaming mice. The EVGA feels sturdier and has a thumb rest. It also has three additional buttons, including an extra side button and a scroll wheel with L/R tilt buttons. Performance-wise, it has a much wider CPI range, a CPI you can set precisely, a lower lift-off distance, and a higher maximum polling rate. It also has RGB lighting and customization software, which the BenQ lacks. The BenQ is somewhat lighter, has better click latency, and has a much more consistent sensor.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the BenQ ZOWIE ZA11-B are both simple gaming mice. The EC2 has a slight right-handed slant, whereas the ZA11-B has an ambidextrous shape. Both mice use the same sensor, which has a very narrow CPI range and a fairly low minimum lift-off distance. Neither have customization software, so you can't adjust the CPI, remap the buttons, or set macros. The EC2 may be a better choice for gaming since its click latency is lower.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the Vaxee ZYGEN NP-01 are comparable wired gaming mice, but the Vaxee is better overall. The Vaxee has a lighter weight, a more flexible and better quality cable, smoother-gliding mouse feet, and a lower lift-off distance. Otherwise, neither mouse has customization software to reprogram buttons or adjust the CPI, and you can only cycle between four CPI presets on each.

The G-Wolves Hati HT-S ACE Edition is a better, wired gaming mouse than the BenQ ZOWIE EC2. The G-Wolves is nearly half of the weight of the BenQ and feels sturdier. It also has a more flexible cable and mouse feet that glide more smoothly. Performance-wise it has a lower lift-off distance, a wider CPI range, and you can precisely adjust the CPI, while the BenQ only has four CPI presets. It also has customization software which the BenQ lacks. Both mice have nearly identical click latency and are well-suited for all grip types. However, the BenQ is better-suited for larger hands, while the G-Wolves is more accommodating for smaller hands.

The G-Wolves Skoll SK-S ACE Edition is an excellent ultra-light gaming mouse, while the BenQ ZOWIE EC2 is a good FPS gaming mouse. The G-Wolves is significantly lighter and feels better built. It has a more flexible cable, smoother-gliding mouse feet, and a lower lift-off distance. Also, the G-Wolves has customization software, unlike the BenQ, and you can reprogram buttons and adjust the CPI precisely. On the other hand, the BenQ has slightly lower click latency.

The EQEOVGA D10 RGB has a very similar shape to the BenQ ZOWIE EC2, but the EQEOVGA performs better overall. THE EQEOVGA is much lighter and has a more flexible cable. It also has a wider CPI range, a CPI you can adjust by increments of 100, and customization software, which the BenQ lacks. On the other hand, the BenQ has a marginally more consistent sensor and lower click latency, though most people are unlikely to notice a difference. Unfortunately, it only has four default CPI presets.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the Redragon COBRA M711-FPS are wired gaming mice with comparable performance. The BenQ is somewhat lighter and has mouse feet that glide more smoothly. It also has lower click latency. On the other hand, the Redragon feels somewhat sturdier and has a wider CPI range. It has three buttons behind the scroll wheel, which adjust CPI and lighting settings by default, whereas the BenQ has no buttons behind its scroll wheel. The Redragon also has customization software, which the BenQ lacks. Both mice are suitable for all grip types and almost all hand sizes.

In most respects, the SteelSeries Prime+ is a better wired gaming mouse than the BenQ ZOWIE EC2. The Prime+ is significantly lighter, has a more flexible cable, mouse feet that glide more smoothly, and an OLED screen on the underside that you can use to adjust settings without the software. It also has a much wider CPI range, an adjustable CPI, a lower lift-off distance, and companion software for customization. It's ideal for a claw grip for all hand sizes. Comparatively, the BenQ has a much lower click latency and is ideal for a palm grip for all hand sizes.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the Microsoft Pro IntelliMouse are good wired gaming mice with ergonomic right-handed shapes. The BenQ is significantly lighter and has much lower click latency. Comparatively, the Microsoft feels sturdier, has a much wider CPI range, an adjustable CPI, and a lower lift-off distance. It also has companion software for customization, which the BenQ lacks. The BenQ is well-suited for all hand sizes using a palm grip, but otherwise, both mice are better-suited for larger hands using other grip types.

The Pulsar Xlite is a better wired gaming mouse than the BenQ ZOWIE EC2. The Pulsar is significantly lighter and feels much sturdier. It has a much more flexible cable and mouse feet that glide more smoothly. It also has a wider CPI range, an adjustable CPI, and a lower lift-off distance. Additionally, it has customization software, which the BenQ lacks. On the other hand, the BenQ ZOWIE only has four default CPI settings. Both mice are suitable for all grip types, but the Pulsar is accomodating to a wider range of hand sizes.

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2 is a somewhat better gaming mouse than the ASUS TUF Gaming M3. It has a slightly more flexible cable, mouse feet that glide more smoothly, and a much lower click latency. Unfortunately, it only has four default CPI presets. Comparatively, the ASUS is lighter and feels sturdier. It also has a wider CPI range and an adjustable CPI. It has companion software for customization, which the BenQ lacks, but it's only compatible with Windows. Both mice are suitable for all grip types, but the BenQ is better-suited for larger hands, while the ASUS better accommodates smaller hands.