Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW  Mouse Review

Reviewed Jun 19, 2025 at 03:16pm
Tested using methodology v1.5.1 
BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW
6.5
Work 
8.9
Video Games (FPS) 
6.7
Video Games (MMO) 
9.3
Raw Performance 
 15

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW is a wireless gaming mouse that continues BenQ ZOWIE's EC lineup of right-handed gaming mice. It's the follow-up to the EC2-CW, and improves upon it with a new PixArt PAW3950 sensor, a higher maximum polling rate of 4000Hz, virgin-grade PTFE mouse feet, and a lighter shell while keeping the shape unchanged. This mouse is the medium-size option, but it's also available in large and small size variants.

Our Verdict

6.5
Work 

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW is adequate for office work. It has great build quality and a comfortable right-handed shape available in three different sizes. While you can connect it to two devices simultaneously using its two included USB receivers, it lacks Bluetooth support. Also, there isn't any customization software for reprogramming buttons, and the scroll wheel lacks L/R tilt inputs and a free-scrolling mode.

Pros
  • Comfortable right-handed shape available in three sizes.

  • Impressive build quality.

Cons
  • Scroll wheel lacks left-right inputs and a free-scrolling mode.

  • No Bluetooth connectivity

  • No customization software.

8.9
Video Games (FPS) 

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW is a superb FPS gaming mouse. It has great build quality, a well-loved right-handed shape available in three sizes, and is very lightweight. It also has amazing raw performance with low click and sensor latency that helps offer a responsive-feeling gaming experience.

Pros
  • Superb raw performance.

  • Comfortable right-handed shape available in three sizes.

  • Very lightweight.

  • Impressive build quality.

Cons
None
6.7
Video Games (MMO) 

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW is okay for MMO gaming, but it doesn't have nearly as many side buttons as dedicated MMO gaming mice. It has excellent build quality and a comfortable ergonomic shape that's available in three different sizes. It also has superb raw performance, delivering a consistent and responsive in-game experience.

Pros
  • Superb raw performance.

  • Comfortable right-handed shape available in three sizes.

  • Impressive build quality.

Cons
  • Not nearly as many side buttons as a dedicated MMO gaming mouse.

9.3
Raw Performance 

The BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW has remarkable overall raw performance. It has fantastic sensor latency and accuracy and a maximum polling rate of 4000Hz. It also has excellent click latency, but it's marginally worse than other contemporary flagship gaming mice. However, it's still suitable for competitive gaming at the highest level.

Pros
  • Excellent click latency.

  • Fantastic sensor latency and accuracy.

Cons
None
  • 6.5
    Work
  • 8.9
    Video Games (FPS)
  • 6.7
    Video Games (MMO)
  • 9.3
    Raw Performance
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Aug 28, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.5.1. This update removes less relevant or redundant elements, including several videos. We've also adjusted our Sensor Latency testing, resulting in minor score changes. See our full 1.5.1 changelog for details.
    2.  Updated Jul 07, 2025: 

      We've corrected a mistake in the CPI section where the original 400 CPI results were missing a minus sign. This correction has slightly improved the score for this section. While the text in the CPI section remains unchanged, we've made a small update to the FPS verdict to reflect the adjusted score.

    3.  Updated Jun 19, 2025: Review published.
    4.  Updated Jun 13, 2025: Early access published.

    Check Price

    Matte/BlackZOWIE EC2-DW
    SEE PRICE
    Amazon.com
    Matte/BlackZOWIE EC2-DW
    B&H
    Matte/BlackZOWIE EC2-DW
    BestBuy.com
    Matte/BlackZOWIE EC2-DW
    Walmart.com

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    The BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW is only available in a black colorway. This mouse is part of a wider lineup of EC-DW Series, which are wireless iterations of BenQ Zowie's original EC Series mice, and an update to the EC-CW series. This mouse is available in three different sizes.

    NameSize
    EC3-DWSmall
    EC2-DWMedium
    EC1-DWLarge

    We bought and tested the Medium-sized EC2-DW, but we expect the results of our tests to broadly apply to all three size variants. You can see a photo of our unit's label here.

    Popular Mouse Comparisons

    The BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW continues BenQ ZOWIE's venerable lineup of right-handed gaming mice that originally launched in 2009. It improves upon the last wireless iteration, the BenQ ZOWIE EC2-CW, with a new PixArt PAW3950 sensor, better mouse feet, lighter weight, and a higher maximum polling rate of 4000Hz. Otherwise, it has an identical shape and the same esports-focused ethos. Like other ZOWIE mice, it doesn't have any companion software, but you can change its settings on the mouse itself. This is useful for tournament play, where peripheral software may be banned. It also includes an 'Enhanced Receiver' which is required to reach polling rates above 1000Hz and is advertised to provide better wireless stability in noisy wireless environments, like LAN tournaments.

    Its flagship price point puts it in competition with mice like Razer DeathAdder V3 Pro and the Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT 2 DEX. While it generally can go shot-for-shot with those mice performance-wise, it has marginally worse click latency performance and a lower maximum polling rate. It's still an absolutely fantastic performer and very well suited for the highest levels of competitive play. It's also available in three different sizes, which gives it a leg up on the competition if you have smaller or larger hands.

    For more recommendations, see our picks for the best FPS mouse, the best gaming mouse, and the best lightweight mouse.

    Razer DeathAdder V3 Pro

    The Razer DeathAdder V3 Pro and the BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW are wireless gaming mice with right-handed shapes. The Razer is slightly bigger than the medium EC2 variant of the BenQ ZOWIE, but the latter is also available in small and large sizes. The two deliver very similar raw performance, but the Razer has marginally better click latency while the ZOWIE has marginally better sensor latency. Otherwise, the Razer uses the Synapse software to change mouse settings, while the ZOWIE doesn't have any companion software, and all its settings can be changed using buttons on the mouse itself.

    Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT 2 DEX

    The Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT 2 DEX and the BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW are wireless gaming mice with right-handed shapes. They have similar shapes, but the Logitech is slightly bigger and its hump has a different center hump with a more rounded curvature. The ZOWIE is available in small, medium, and large sizes, while the Logitech is only available in one size. While both mice have superb performance, the Logitech just edges out the ZOWIE with slightly better click latency and a higher 8000Hz polling rate.

    BenQ ZOWIE EC2-CW

    The BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW is the successor to the BenQ ZOWIE EC2-CW. While keeping the same shape, the DW improves on the CW with some small, yet meaningful changes that add up for a better overall experience. Namely, it's significantly lighter, has better mouse feet, and has a new sensor with a higher maximum polling rate of 4000Hz.

    Vaxee ZYGEN NP-01S Wireless (4K)

    The BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW and the Vaxee ZYGEN NP-01S Wireless (4K) are wireless gaming mice with right-handed shapes. The Vaxee's shape has a considerably lower profile than the ZOWIE, and its hump is flatter and further towards the rear. This gives it a smaller feel in-hand and allows for more flexibility for hybrid grip types. That said, the ZOWIE is significantly lighter than the Vaxee. The two have similar superb performance, but the Vaxee has marginally better click latency.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    Style
    Type
    Standard
    Coating
    Matte
    Lighting ColorNo Lighting

    The BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW has nearly identical styling to previous models in this lineup, the BenQ ZOWIE EC2 and the BenQ ZOWIE EC2-CW. It's made of matte black plastic, while the two side buttons have a glossy black finish. There's a red ZOWIE logo on the palm rest and a contrasting glossy BenQ logo on the bottom of the left side of the mouse. There's also a small red accent on the front left side of the mouse under the left click button.

    Shape
    Length4.8" (123 mm)
    Width2.6" (66 mm)
    Height1.7" (42 mm)
    Grip Width
    60 mm
    Ambidextrous
    No
    Left-Handed Friendly
    No
    Finger Rest
    No

    Note: We applied an aerosol spray that adds small white particles in order to get a more accurate 3D scan. These particles are visible in the scan but not present on the mouse out of the box. They're only cosmetic and don't affect the accuracy of the measurements.

    8.0
    Build Quality

    The BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW has great build quality overall. It's made of solid-feeling plastic with a matte finish. It doesn't exhibit any creaking or rattling, and there's no flex on the top or the sides. That said, there's flexibility on the underside of the mouse to the point where you can actuate either of the main click buttons by applying enough pressure. Still, this shouldn't be an issue during normal use.

    9.0
    Weight
    Lowest Weight
    59.7 g
    Default Weight
    59.7 g
    Weight Distribution
    Centered
    Extra Weights
    No
    Hand Size Recommendation
    Palm Grip Hand Recommendation
    Claw Grip Hand Recommendation
    Fingertip Grip Hand Recommendation

    The BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW has an identical right-handed shape to the previous iterations. It has a rounded hump in the middle of the mouse with a subtle inward curve on the left side. It's best suited for medium and larger-sized hands using a palm or claw grip.

    This mouse is the Medium variant in a lineup that also features a Large and Small size. If you have smaller hands, you may prefer the smaller-sized BenQ ZOWIE EC3-DW, or if you have extra-large hands, you'll be more comfortable using the BenQ ZOWIE EC1-DW

    7.3
    Wireless Versatility
    Maximum Of Paired Devices
    2
    Bluetooth
    No
    Receiver
    Yes
    Battery Type
    Rechargeable
    Use When Charging
    Yes
    On/Off Activation
    Auto Off And On/Off Switch
    Receiver Extender
    Yes
    Receiver Storing
    No
    Battery IndicatorYes

    BenQ ZOWIE advertises that this mouse has a maximum battery life of 80 hours at 1000Hz, 30 hours at 2000Hz, or 24 hours at 4000Hz.

    This mouse includes an 'Enhanced Wireless Receiver', which doubles as a charging dock. BenQ ZOWIE claims this receiver delivers better wireless stability than a conventional wireless receiver. Our test bench doesn't test for wireless stability, so we can't verify its effectiveness.

    Cable
    ConnectivityWireless
    Cable Length
    6.9 ft (2.1 m)
    Cable Type
    Rubber
    Permanent Kink
    Yes
    Port Type: Mouse End
    USB-C
    Port Type: PC End
    USB-A

    This mouse comes with a basic rubber cable. It's not particularly flexible and is somewhat prone to tangling. 

    9.0
    Mouse Feet
    Gliding Experience
    Very Good
    Material
    Virgin Grade PTFE
    Extra Included
    Yes

    This mouse has superb mouse feet that glide incredibly smoothly and easily. They're a notable improvement over the black PTFE feet that the previous iteration, the BenQ ZOWIE EC2-CW, used. Two additional sets of mouse feet are included in the box, one virgin-grade and one dyed black.

    In The Box

    • Enhanced wireless receiver
    • USB-A wireless receiver
    • Receiver extender
    • USB-A to USB-C cable
    • Replacement mouse feet (black)
    • Replacement mouse feet (white)
    • User documentation

    Control
    Main Button
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Switch Type
    Mechanical
    Switch Model
    Not Specified
    4.3
    Additional Buttons
    Total Number Of Buttons
    7
    Number Of Side Buttons
    2
    Number Of Programmable Inputs
    0
    Profile Switching Button
    No
    Gesture Support
    No

    This mouse doesn't have first-party software that allows you to reprogram any of its inputs. There is a CPI button and a polling rate button on the underside of the mouse that allow you to cycle through their respective settings.

    8.6
    Click Latency
    See details on graph tool
    Expected Connection
    5.5 ms
    Wired
    5.8 ms
    Receiver
    5.5 ms
    Bluetooth
    N/A

    This mouse has excellent click latency that's suitable for any genre of gaming at any competitive level.

    We achieved these results using a 4000Hz polling rate with the 'Enhanced Receiver', at 1000Hz wired, and with the 'Click Response Time' (also known as "Debounce" or "Debounce Delay") at its lowest setting (fast).

    The wired results are unexpectedly less consistent than the wireless results, so we retested them multiple times to ensure our results were correct.

    9.4
    CPI
    See details on graph tool
    SRAV @ 1600 CPI
    -0.02%
    SRAV @ 800 CPI
    0.13%
    SRAV @ 400 CPI
    0.17%
    SRAV @ Fixed CPI
    N/A
    Precision Error Between Speeds
    0.20%
    Precision Error Between CPI
    0.20%
    Worst Tracking Error
    -5.75%
    Minimum CPI
    400 CPI
    Maximum CPI
    3,200 CPI
    CPI Adjustment Steps
    N/A

    This mouse's sensor doesn't exhibit any problematic variation or tracking accuracy issues.

    9.1
    Sensor Latency
    See details on graph tool
    Delay To Start Of Movement
    6.7 ms
    Delay At Half Movement
    2.6 ms
    Delay To End Of Movement
    7.1 ms

    This mouse has fantastic sensor latency performance suitable for gaming at any competitive level.

    The above results are using the 'Enhanced Receiver' at polling rate of 4000Hz with motion sync turned off.

    The table below shows the results of supplementary testing we conducted at different polling rates.

    Connection TypePolling RateDelay to Start of MovementDelay at Half MovementDelay to End of Movement
    Wired1000Hz10.9 ms1.9 ms3.3 ms
    Wireless (Standard Receiver)1000Hz10.9 ms2.5 ms3.9 ms
    Wireless (Enhanced Receiver)1000Hz12.0 ms2.5 ms4.8 ms
    4000Hz + Motion Sync16.2 ms2.4 ms3.1 ms

    Sensor Specifications
    Sensor Technology
    Optical (LED)
    Sensor Model
    PixArt PAW3950
    Works On Glass
    Yes
    Minimum Lift Off Distance
    1.2 mm
    Maximum Polling Rate
    4000 Hz

    This mouse's wireless polling rate options are 125Hz, 500Hz, 1000Hz, 2000Hz, and 4000Hz using the 'Enhanced Receiver'. Its maximum polling rate with the standard receiver or with a wired connection is 1000Hz.

    Mouse Wheel
    Scroll Wheel Type
    Notched Wheel
    Scroll Wheel Tilt
    No
    Thumb Wheel Type
    No

    This mouse's scroll wheel is made of plastic with a grippy, grooved rubber finish. It scrolls precisely and notably smoother and more quietly than its predecessor, the BenQ ZOWIE EC2-CW.

    Noise
    Click Noise
    Quiet

    Both main click buttons, the side buttons, and the scroll wheel operate quietly and are unlikely to bother anyone around you.

    Operating System And Software
    Configuration Software
    Software NameNo software
    Software Windows Compatibility
    No
    Software macOS Compatibility
    No
    On-Board Memory
    No
    CPI (DPI) Adjustment
    No
    Polling Rate Adjustment
    No
    Profile Configuration
    No
    Profile Auto-Switching
    No
    RGB On/Off
    No

    There isn't any customization software for this mouse, but you can change expected settings like polling rate, CPI, LOD (lift-off distance), and click response time directly on the mouse itself. The button combinations for changing these settings are listed in the user manual. You can see an online version of this manual on BenQ's website.

    10
    Mouse Compatibility
    Windows CompatibilityFully
    macOS CompatibilityFully

    Comments

    1. Product

    BenQ ZOWIE EC2-DW: Main Discussion

    Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

    PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
    Sort by:
    newest first
    1. Update: We’ve converted this review to Test Bench 1.5.1. This update removes less relevant or redundant elements, including several videos. We’ve also adjusted our Sensor Latency testing, resulting in minor score changes. See our full 1.5.1 changelog for details.

    2. 3
      2
      1
      2
      0

      The only game I find that does not work with >1Khz is some of the Persona games which are games designed for gamepads anyway and it is framerate capped at 120FPS because its game logic is tied to framerate and the camera controls is tied to mouse polling rate, so it’s a programming logic oversight than a hardware “bandwidth” issue. I have yet to find a modern PC shooter game that 4Khz doesn’t work with on my 13900K + RTX 4090 setup. e.g. Battlefield 3/4/1/5/2047, Call of Duty games, CSGO/CS2, Overwatch 2, Valorant, Fortnite, Helldivers 2, R6S, Ready or Not, Cyberpunk 2077, Halo MCC+Infinite, Ratchet and Clank (PC), RDR2, etc. If you bought this mouse then you probably already rocking a 7800X3D at the very least. I remember The Last of Us Part 1 on PC at launched had really stuttery camera with mouse and keyboard, increasing my polling rate from 1Khz to 4Khz actually helped a lot with smoothing out the camera rotational samples, so that’s one example where brute forcing shoddy camera programming with polling rate can actually help overcome the game’s limitations. They did eventually patched this so that it is now fine on 1Khz, but the point is that the higher polling rate actually helped than add any issues. So again I don’t see why you would stick with 2Khz for “better” battery life over 4Khz if you’re going to charge your phone, wireless earbuds, etc. every night, may as well just charge your mouse overnight at the same time, especially with a convenient charging dock like that. (And even at 4Khz it can last two days so if you forget to charge it one night it will still be fine the next day - you’re not going to forget to charge your phone two nights in a row) So you either just pick 1Khz for games that has game logic tied to framerate and mouse polling rate or 4Khz for anything else, I don’t see the point of 2Khz, it’s a weird compromise where it is can’t work on games that has game logic issues tied to framerate and polling rate (>1000Hz), then you 4Khz that is just better performance with enough battery life that can last you two days, especially when everyone charge their devices (phones, earbuds, etc) as a nightly ritual already.

      You are too caught up in the hype of high hz. If you are playing slow tactical shooters like CS then you are most likely not even saturating 1khz 99.99% of the time, unless you play extremely low sense and 3200dpi where you might saturate 2khz on 180 degree flicks and 1khz on shorter fast flicks. Faster shooters where you are constantly flicking 90-180 degree turns will load the bus a lot more.

      The latency advantage of 4khz over 1khz is not something you will notice if all hz settings are implemented equal. E.g. sensor, on board processor etc. are running at the same performance level. Most manufacturers run 1khz wireless and lower at lower power modes so the performance becomes lower (higher latency etc.). Let someone else set the hz for you so that you don’t know what the mouse is running and you will most likely not notice any difference in game between 1khz and 4khz unless the mouse has major difference between 1khz and higher polling rates or the game is less smooth due higher loading of the CPU.

      Saturating the USB bus on 4khz and 8khz will cause much higher CPU load. You want as much CPU available for the game to create the next frames to keep the latency low. Using 2khz usually bumps up the sensor and on board CPU performance closer to wired levels, which is why using 2khz gives some advantage over 1khz.

      I would prefer 1khz mode with everything set to max over higher polling rates. Battery life would be close to as bad as 4khz, but latency would be within 1ms of 4khz in all aspects and there would be no extra CPU load..

    3. 1
      0
      -1
      1
      -1

      After 2kHz it’s all dimishing returns… I think 2khz is the sweetspot for smoothest performance while giving a decent amount of battery life. I have a fast enough PC for 4khz, but Id rather use 2khz since it makes literally no diff to game performance but does provide much more battery life. Also, less number of charging cycles which means battery life span will be better in the long run.

      Have a look at my other reply: https://www.rtings.com/discussions/ZyR9G_P2jB6yjAa8/review-updates-benq-zowie-ec2-dw?sort=newest#comment-187580

      It only make sense to use 1Khz or 4Khz, not in-between. The game either have controls and logic tied to framerate/polling rate (then stick with 1Khz in that very specific case because the programmers were expecting every mouse to be at 1000Hz), or just leave it at 4Khz and just charge your mouse every night like you do with all you other devices anyway (phone, TWS earbuds, etc).

      “Also, less number of charging cycles which means battery life span will be better in the long run.” - that’s why you don’t use the mouse until empty, 4Khz can last two days in a row, it won’t go below 45% charge if done properly, this has a convenient charging dock, there is almost no excuse for it to completely run out of battery like you do with your phone which everyone plug-in overnight as a nightly or bi-nightly ritual these days. If you charge your phone every night then what stops you from just placing your mouse on the charging dock that takes 1 second?

    4. 1
      0
      -1
      1
      -1

      You are dependent on the game also being able to run 4KHz. A lot of games have issues if you actually saturate the bus (high dpi with low sens and fast movements). Very few games poll higher than 1KHz, a lot of games poll at the frame rate they are running, so 4KHz is more about loading the CPU than actual advantage in game unless the mouse and sensor runs in a very different mode at 4KHz. A lot of mice run the sensor in wired mode or similar to wired mode at highest Hz, but enable power savings at 1KHz and to some degree at 2KHz. Only way to know performance at 2KHz is to actually test it.

      The only game I find that does not work with >1Khz is some of the Persona games which are games designed for gamepads anyway and it is framerate capped at 120FPS because its game logic is tied to framerate and the camera controls is tied to mouse polling rate, so it’s a programming logic oversight than a hardware “bandwidth” issue.

      I have yet to find a modern PC shooter game that 4Khz doesn’t work with on my 13900K + RTX 4090 setup. e.g. Battlefield 3/4/1/5/2047, Call of Duty games, CSGO/CS2, Overwatch 2, Valorant, Fortnite, Helldivers 2, R6S, Ready or Not, Cyberpunk 2077, Halo MCC+Infinite, Ratchet and Clank (PC), RDR2, etc. If you bought this mouse then you probably already rocking a 7800X3D at the very least.

      I remember The Last of Us Part 1 on PC at launched had really stuttery camera with mouse and keyboard, increasing my polling rate from 1Khz to 4Khz actually helped a lot with smoothing out the camera rotational samples, so that’s one example where brute forcing shoddy camera programming with polling rate can actually help overcome the game’s limitations. They did eventually patched this so that it is now fine on 1Khz, but the point is that the higher polling rate actually helped than add any issues.

      So again I don’t see why you would stick with 2Khz for “better” battery life over 4Khz if you’re going to charge your phone, wireless earbuds, etc. every night, may as well just charge your mouse overnight at the same time, especially with a convenient charging dock like that. (And even at 4Khz it can last two days so if you forget to charge it one night it will still be fine the next day - you’re not going to forget to charge your phone two nights in a row)

      So you either just pick 1Khz for games that has game logic tied to framerate and mouse polling rate or 4Khz for anything else, I don’t see the point of 2Khz, it’s a weird compromise where it is can’t work on games that has game logic issues tied to framerate and polling rate (>1000Hz), then you 4Khz that is just better performance with enough battery life that can last you two days, especially when everyone charge their devices (phones, earbuds, etc) as a nightly ritual already.

    5. 3
      2
      1
      2
      0

      Kind of strange that the mid and end of motion sensor latency is so much worse at 1600 and 3200 dpi. Wonder if the 1000 and 1200 dpi is more similar to 800 dpi or 1600 dpi.

      Hey erk_ ! Here are the results and I’m also adding a screenshot to help visualize it better 😄 1000 dpi:

      • Delay To Start Of Movement 11.0 ms
      • Delay At Half Movement 1.0 ms
      • Delay To End Of Movement 2.4 ms

      1200dpi:

      Thank you again and have a great week! 😄

    6. 4
      3
      2
      3
      0

      Kind of strange that the mid and end of motion sensor latency is so much worse at 1600 and 3200 dpi. Wonder if the 1000 and 1200 dpi is more similar to 800 dpi or 1600 dpi.

      Hey erk_! I’ll try 1000 and 1200 dpi for you next week and give the results here! Thank you! 😄

    7. Update: We’ve corrected a mistake in the CPI section where the original 400 CPI results were missing a minus sign. This correction has slightly improved the score for this section. While the text in the CPI section remains unchanged, we’ve made a small update to the FPS verdict to reflect the adjusted score.

    8. 1
      0
      -1
      2
      -2

      Why use 2Khz if there is a convenient charging dock and the battery will last a couple of days anyway? Most people charge their phone and peripherals overnight so there is no chance that the mouse will run out of battery. Just stick with 4Khz. This mouse is expensive, so there is also a big chance you have an expensive PC too that can handle high polling rate just fine.

      After 2kHz it’s all dimishing returns… I think 2khz is the sweetspot for smoothest performance while giving a decent amount of battery life. I have a fast enough PC for 4khz, but Id rather use 2khz since it makes literally no diff to game performance but does provide much more battery life. Also, less number of charging cycles which means battery life span will be better in the long run.

    You have 9/10 free reviews left
    To access
    unlimited full product reviews,
    product prices
    and
    other exclusive site features
    Become an Insider