The LAMZU THORN V2 is a wireless gaming mouse with a right-handed shape. It has several key changes compared to the original LAMZU THORN, including an updated, slightly longer shape with a different coating, a new PixArt PAW NEXT 1 sensor and Nordic MCU, an 8000Hz polling rate out of the box, an optical scroll wheel encoder, new switches, and a reinforced internal structure.
Our Verdict
The LAMZU THORN V2 is adequate for work. It has a supportive right-handed shape that's comfortable for average-sized hands using a palm or claw grip, and you can reprogram its buttons for shortcuts or macros. It also has good build quality, although the finish scratches easily. However, it lacks Bluetooth and multi-device pairing, so switching between computers is inconvenient. Its scroll wheel also lacks tilt inputs and a free-scrolling mode for navigating wide spreadsheets or long documents.
Supportive right-handed shape.
Good build quality.
Finish scratches easily or is prone to fingerprints depending on color.
No Bluetooth or multi-device pairing.
Scroll wheel lacks tilt inputs and a free-scrolling mode.
The LAMZU THORN V2 is excellent for FPS gaming. It's lightweight and has smooth-gliding feet that make it easy to move quickly, while its exceptionally low click latency and outstanding sensor latency provide a highly responsive gaming experience. It has a right-handed shape that's well-suited to average-sized hands using a palm or claw grip. However, it has more speed-related tracking variation than usual, meaning the same physical movement can move your cursor a slightly different distance depending on how quickly you move the mouse.
Lightweight, easy to move quickly.
Exceptionally low click latency.
Outstanding sensor latency.
Supportive right-handed shape.
Finish scratches easily or is prone to fingerprints depending on color.
More speed-related tracking variation than usual.
The LAMZU THORN V2 is good for MMO gaming. It has a supportive right-handed shape for average-sized hands, good build quality, and exceptionally low click latency. You can assign shortcuts and macros to its programmable buttons and save your settings to onboard memory. However, it only has two side buttons, limiting how many abilities you can access directly compared to a dedicated MMO mouse.
Exceptionally low click latency.
Supportive right-handed shape.
Finish scratches easily or is prone to fingerprints depending on color.
More speed-related tracking variation than usual.
Only two side buttons.
The LAMZU THORN V2 delivers outstanding raw performance. Its exceptionally low and consistent click latency and outstanding sensor latency make it highly responsive for competitive gaming. It supports polling rates up to 8000Hz. However, it has more speed-related accuracy variation than usual, so cursor travel varies slightly with movement speed. This is a small tracking inconsistency that you can adjust to over time with muscle memory.
Exceptionally low click latency.
Outstanding sensor latency.
More speed-related tracking variation than usual.
Check Price
Differences Between Sizes And Variants
The LAMZU THORN V2 is available in Purple, Black-Red, Orange, and White. There are no other variants.
This mouse doesn't have a label.
Popular Mouse Comparisons
The LAMZU THORN V2 iterates on the original LAMZU THORN with a slightly longer, more sculpted shape, an updated internal structure and closed bottom plate, a newer sensor and processor, an optical scroll wheel encoder, and an included 8000Hz receiver. The updated shell is a welcome improvement, but the original is slightly lighter and has more consistent sensor tracking.
It's up against other right-handed gaming mice, like the slightly more expensive Razer DeathAdder V4 Pro and the Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT 2 DEX. The Razer's shape better accommodates larger hands, while the Logitech offers better build quality but thinner stock feet that don't glide as well. The THORN V2's main compromise is its slightly less accurate sensor tracking than the competition.
For more recommendations, see our picks for the best FPS mouse, the best wireless gaming mouse, and the best lightweight mouse.
The LAMZU THORN V2 and the Razer DeathAdder V4 Pro are lightweight wireless gaming mice with right-handed shapes. The LAMZU is smaller and best suited to average-sized hands using palm or claw grips, while the Razer's larger shape is better suited for large hands, particularly in a palm grip. Both have an 8000Hz polling rate, use optical scroll wheel encoders, and deliver highly responsive gaming performance. The Razer has a more accurate sensor and better build quality, while the THORN V2's finish scratches easily. For most, the difference in size and hand support is the most meaningful difference between them.
The LAMZU THORN V2 and the LAMZU THORN are lightweight wireless gaming mice with similar right-handed shapes. The V2 is slightly longer and has more sculpted sides, resulting in a more supportive shape. The V2 adds an optical scroll wheel encoder, a solid baseplate, and an included 8000Hz receiver. The original supports 4000Hz with a separately purchased receiver. The two mice deliver similar performance, but the V2 has slightly less accurate sensor tracking. Both have good build quality, although the V2's tested finish scratches easily.
The LAMZU THORN V2 and the Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT 2 DEX are lightweight wireless gaming mice with supportive right-handed shapes. Both deliver highly responsive gaming performance. The LAMZU is a little lighter and has smoother-gliding stock feet, while the Logitech has better build quality. The LAMZU also uses an optical scroll-wheel encoder, which should be less prone to dust ingress, whereas the Logitech uses a mechanical encoder. The LAMZU's main drawbacks are its easily scratched finish and slightly less consistent tracking performance.
The LAMZU THORN V2 and the LAMZU Inca are wireless gaming mice with different shapes. The V2 has a larger, right-handed shape that best supports average-sized hands in palm or claw grips. The Inca has a smaller symmetrical shape with a narrow waist and rearward hump, making it better suited to relaxed claw grips for small or medium-sized hands. The Inca is much lighter and has better build quality. Both deliver exceptionally responsive gaming performance, but the Inca offers better tracking consistency.
Test Results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for videos & test results
