Epson EcoTank ET-3760 Printer Review

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 and the Epson EcoTank ET-4700 are two similar supertank printers. They both have very high black and color page yields, but both suffer when it comes to color and photo printing speeds. However, the ET-3760 has a much quicker printing speed for black text documents, while on the other hand, the ET-4700 has faxing capabilities.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 and the Canon PIXMA G7020 are both supertank inkjet printers, but the Canon has better photo printing performance. The Canon feels better built, yields more color pages at a lower cost-per-print, and prints better-looking photos. It also holds more paper in its input tray, and it has a fax feature. On the other hand, the Epson yields significantly more black pages and prints much faster, so it may be a better choice if you print long documents more often.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 and the HP Smart Tank Plus 551 are both supertank printers. If you print photos most often, the HP is a better choice thanks to its much higher color page yield, lower cost-per-print for photos, and better color accuracy. If you're planning on printing documents most often, the Epson may be a better choice since it yields more black pages and prints documents much faster.

The Epson EcoTank Pro ET-5850 and the Epson EcoTank ET-3760 are all-in-one color inkjet printers that use supertanks. However, the ET-3760 has much better page yields and a much better overall cost-per-print. On the other hand, the ET-5850 is much better for small or home offices, with faster printing speeds and much better-looking produced photos with much more accurate colors. It can print directly from USB flash drives, its automatic document feeder can duplex scan, and it can fax.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 is an all-in-one supertank inkjet printer, while the Brother HL-L2350DW is a monochrome printer-only unit. The Brother is better if you only need to print black-only text documents, as it has a much faster printing speed. However, the Epson is better if you want more flexibility, as it has a scanner and can print in color. It also offers a better page yield and has a cheaper cost-per-print.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 and the Brother MFC-J805DW INKvestment Tank are differently designed printers, but the Epson is better for small/home offices. The Epson's supertank ink system can yield more pages before the tanks need to be refilled, and it has a lower cost-per-print. It also prints black and color documents more quickly, and it has better color accuracy. In contrast, the Brother feels better built and has faxing capabilities, but it lacks an Ethernet port.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 and the HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e are both all-in-one color inkjet printers, but the Epson is better for students, as it uses a supertank system for far superior page yields and cost-per-print. On the other hand, the HP is better for small or home offices, as it prints much faster overall, has a better screen, can print directly from USB flash drives, can fax, and its automatic document feeder supports duplex scanning. It also prints somewhat better-looking photos with much more accurate colors.

The Brother MFC-J4335DW is better for black-and-white printing, while the Epson EcoTank ET-3760 is better for families. The Epson uses a supertank ink system for far better page yields at a much cheaper cost-per-print, and it prints much better-looking photos. On the other hand, the Brother has built-in fax, prints the first page out much faster, prints color documents more quickly, and produces significantly more accurate colors. Depending on your office needs, you could choose the Epson for its superior page yields or the Brother for its built-in fax and faster overall printing speeds.

The Brother MFC-J995DW is a bit better overall than the Epson EcoTank ET-3760. The Brother has a touchscreen display, feels better built, does a better job at printing photos, and can print directly from a USB or an SD card. However, since the Epson has a supertank cartridge system, it has a much higher page yield, so the cost-per-print is a lot less.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 is better for small or home offices than the Canon PIXMA G3260. The Epson has a better black page yield and black-only cost-per-print, and also has an automatic document feeder and an Ethernet port. It also supports duplex printing. On the other hand, the Canon is better for family use, with a better color page yield, and cheaper color document and photo cost-per-print. It also prints crisper photos with more accurate colors.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 and the Epson EcoTank ET-15000 are all-in-one color inkjet printers with supertank ink systems. As a result, they both have incredibly high page yields and an incredibly low cost-per-print. The ET-15000 prints better-quality photos, has faxing capabilities, and can print on large-format tabloid-size paper. On the other hand, the ET-3760 has better color accuracy, but the difference shouldn't be noticeable during normal use.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 and the Canon PIXMA G6020 are both supertank printers. The Canon is a better choice for printing photos due to its lower photo cost-per-print, faster photo printing time, and better photo printing quality. On the other hand, the Epson is better for home offices as it has an ADF, a higher black-only page yield, and faster black-only document printing speed.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 and the Epson WorkForce Pro WF-4830 are both all-in-one printers, but the EcoTank features a SuperTank cartridge system. This system yields an exceptional amount of pages for both color and black-only text documents, and the cost-per-print is incredibly low. However, the WorkForce Pro produces much higher quality photos with much more accurate-looking colors, and it has an automatic document feeder that can perform duplex scanning. 

The HP ENVY Photo 7855 and the Epson EcoTank ET-3760 are all-in-one color inkjet printers, but the Epson uses a supertank ink system for a significantly better cost-per-print and page yields. It also prints black-only text documents faster. On the other hand, the HP is better for casual photos, with significantly better photo quality and color accuracy. It also prints photos much faster, can print from Bluetooth, directly via USB flash drives and SD cards, and has faxing capabilities.

The Brother MFC-L3770CWD Laser and the Epson EcoTank ET-3760 are two differently designed printers. The Brother is a laser printer and it's better suited for small/home offices as it has an integrated fax feature and duplex scanning. It's also much quicker at printing black and color documents. However, the Epson is more versatile. This supertank printer can yield an outstanding number of pages before its tanks need to be refilled, which helps to keep its cost-per-print low. It has better photo printing quality, too.

The Brother HL-L2390DW and the Epson EcoTank ET-3760 are two differently designed printers. The Brother is a monochrome laser printer that lacks a sheetfed scanner. That being said, it has an outstanding print speed for black-text documents, which is great for people who run a lot of these kinds of print jobs. On the other hand, the Epson is more versatile overall as it's a color printer. Thanks to its supertank system, it can yield a lot of pages at an affordable cost-per-print. It also has decent photo printing quality, and it even has an Ethernet port.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 and the Epson Expression Premium ET-7750 EcoTank are all-in-one color inkjet printers with supertank ink systems. The ET-3760 is a better home office printer as it has an ADF, prints black-only documents more quickly, and has a much better color page yield and color document cost-per-print. However, the ET-7750 has a much better black page yield, can print tabloid-size paper, prints photos significantly faster and with much better quality, and can print directly from SD cards and USB flash drives.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 is an overall better printer than the Brother MFC-J895DW. The Epson has much better black and color document yields, significantly better cost-per-print, and somewhat better printing speed. On the other hand, the Brother has slightly better color accuracy and significantly better photo printing quality, and prints photos much faster. It also feels better-built and has faxing capabilities.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 is a much better printer overall compared to the Canon PIXMA G2260. The Epson has a better page yield and cheaper cost-per-print, and faster print speed for black-only documents. It also has an automatic document feeder, numerous connectivity options, companion app support, and a much better screen. However, the Canon is better for casual photo printing, with a better page yield, cost-per-print, and print speed for photos. It also has much better color accuracy and photo quality than the Epson, but can only connect via USB to a computer.

The HP OfficeJet Pro 9015 and the Epson EcoTank ET-3760 are both great for office use, but the HP is slightly better because it supports duplex scanning and has a fax feature. It also feels better built and has a touchscreen display. However, the Epson uses a supertank cartridge system, which has much a higher page yield and costs significantly less per print.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 is much better than the HP DeskJet 2755e, especially since it uses a supertank. Instead of disposable cartridges, the Epson has four refillable ink tanks that yield many pages, which helps to keep the cost-per-print much lower than the HP's. What's more, the Epson prints much faster and automatically prints double-sided sheets, unlike the HP. While its color accuracy isn't nearly as good as the HP's, the Epson's photo printing quality is still better, so you may prefer this option for printing pictures.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 and the Canon PIXMA TR150 are both inkjet printers, but they're for different purposes. The Canon is designed to be travel-friendly, so it's very compact and comes with a rechargeable battery. Because it's so slim, there's no sheetfed scanner or flatbed scanner. The Canon also has much better color accuracy and photo printing quality, making it a better choice for photos if these aspects are important to you. On the other hand, the Epson is an all-in-one with a flatbed scanner and a larger input tray. Instead of using disposable cartridges like the Canon, it uses four refillable ink tanks, which yield a significantly higher number of pages at a much lower cost-per-print. This makes it a better choice if you intend to print a lot.

The Canon PIXMA iX6820 is better for photo printing than the Epson EcoTank ET-3760. The Canon prints photos much faster, has better color accuracy and significantly better photo printing quality, and can even print on 11" × 17" tabloid paper. However, the Epson has significantly better page yields, costs-per-print, and print speeds for black-only and color documents. It also feels better built, with a display screen and a scanner, and supports Wi-Fi Direct and Mopria Print Service.

The Epson EcoTank ET-3760 is an all-in-one color printer, while the Epson WorkForce ST-M1000 is a monochrome printer-only model. Both are supertank printers with high page yields, but the ET-3760 can print out significantly more pages. It's a better option if you need something more versatile as it includes a flatbed scanner and an automatic document feeder. On the other hand, the ST-M1000 is a good option if you're looking for a straightforward model to print in black and white. Also, it takes less time to warm up and print the first page, and it prints black documents faster.