The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is a fairly well-rounded mouse that's versatile enough for a variety of uses. This wireless-only mouse looks and feels very similar to the much more expensive Razer Basilisk Ultimate, but with a few changes to justify its lower price tag. It has no RGB lighting and is powered by a single AA battery instead of charging via USB. This means that there's no plug for it at all, and it can't be used wired. It also lacks the sniper button that the Basilisk series is known for, which is unfortunate.
Our Verdict
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is a surprisingly great mouse for office use. While it has a somewhat gamer-centric look, its lack of RGB lighting and flashy design elements means it will fit in well with most setups. It has an ergonomic right-handed shape with a thumb-rest, making it great for using all day. Its two additional buttons can be reprogrammed, along with its L/R and scroll wheel, so you can set shortcuts to help you navigate your desktop or work software quickly.
-
Good price to performance ratio.
-
Premium and well-built design.
-
Suitable for almost every hand size with every grip type.
-
Superb click latency.
-
Unreliable CPI adjustments.
-
Quite heavy.
Unfortunately, the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is only decent for FPS games as it's quite heavy, and you won't be able to react as quickly with it in-game. That said, it has extremely low click latency and an ergonomic shape that's well-suited to all grip types and most hand sizes.
-
Good price to performance ratio.
-
Premium and well-built design.
-
Suitable for almost every hand size with every grip type.
-
Superb click latency.
-
Unreliable CPI adjustments.
-
Quite heavy.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is a very good mouse for MMO games. While it doesn't have nearly as many buttons as a dedicated MMO mouse, every button that this mouse does have can be reprogrammed. It's also quite comfortable with any grip by any size of hand, except for fingertip with very small hands. Unfortunately, although it has on-board memory, you can't save any macros onto it.
-
Good price to performance ratio.
-
Premium and well-built design.
-
Suitable for almost every hand size with every grip type.
-
Superb click latency.
-
Unreliable CPI adjustments.
-
Quite heavy.
-
Good price to performance ratio.
-
Premium and well-built design.
-
Suitable for almost every hand size with every grip type.
-
Superb click latency.
-
Unreliable CPI adjustments.
-
Quite heavy.
- 6.9 Work
- 8.2 Video Games (FPS)
- 7.8 Video Games (MMO)
- 9.0 Raw Performance
- Updated Jan 05, 2024: We've updated the CPI graph displayed in the Sensor Latency section of this review. Our results remain the same, but these graphs have two new columns with results from the Delay At Half Movement and Delay To End Of Movement tests.
- Updated Nov 24, 2023: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.5. This update adds a new Main Button test group, which provides button actuation data and switch information. We've also made minor changes to how we calculate the Office usage score. For more details, you can see our full changelog here.
- Updated Feb 24, 2023: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.4. This update modifies our Hand Size Recommendation test, adding a more granular hand size recommendation chart. We've moved several minor tests into different test groups, removed the Travel usage, and added a new Raw Performance usage. For more details, you can see our full changelog here.
- Updated Sep 08, 2022: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.3. This update adds a new Sensor Latency test and makes minor changes to several of our existing tests, resulting in test result changes in several sections. For more information, you can check out our full changelog here.
- Updated Aug 12, 2022: Following the update to Test Bench 1.2, some of our test results have changed within both the Weight and CPI sections. We've added or modified some of the text in this review to clarify these changes.
- Updated Aug 10, 2022: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.2. This update simplifies our Weight test and expands on our CPI test from Test Bench 1.1, resulting in changes to test results in both sections. For more details, you can see our complete changelog here.
- Updated Jun 15, 2022: We've updated this review to Test Bench 1.1, which revamped our click latency test methodology. We've updated the text to reflect our new results in various sections, including the Click Latency test box, Usages, Introduction, and other locations where we discuss click latency.
- Updated May 30, 2022: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.1. This update revamps our Click Latency test and results in changes to test results. For more details, you can see our full changelog here.
- Updated Nov 23, 2020: We mistakenly indicated that the mouse doesn't have onboard memory. It has been fixed.
- Updated Oct 05, 2020: Converted to Test Bench 1.0.
- Updated Jan 22, 2020: Review published.
- Updated Jan 15, 2020: Our testers have started testing this product.
- Updated Jan 15, 2020: Early access published.
- Updated Jan 13, 2020: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.
- Updated Jan 06, 2020: We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.
Compared To Other Mice
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is a cheaper version of the Razer Basilisk Ultimate, and a wireless version to the regular Razer Basilisk. Unlike its siblings, the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed doesn't have a sniper button, and unlike the more expensive version, it can't be used wired and is powered by a single AA battery. It's still a very capable mouse, however, especially for the price point. Check out our recommendations for the best gaming mouse, the best FPS mouse, and the overall best mouse.
The Razer Basilisk V3 is a newer, wired iteration in the Basilisk lineup, while the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is an older, wireless iteration. The Basilisk V3 is a wired-only model that's lighter and has better quality mouse feet. It also has five additional buttons, including an extra side button, and it has RGB lighting, which the Basilisk X Hyperspeed lacks. Performance-wise, it has a higher maximum CPI, a lower lift-off distance, and lower click latency. It also has a scroll wheel with L/R tilt buttons and a free-scrolling mode. On the other hand, the Basilisk X Hyperspeed connects wirelessly with its USB receiver or via Bluetooth.
The Logitech G502 HERO is a better gaming mouse than the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed. The Logitech has more programmable buttons, a much more consistent sensor, and a better mouse wheel with L/R tilts, and a button to unlock free scrolling. It also uses Logitech's G HUB, which is compatible with both Windows and macOS. The Razer is wireless and has the same click latency as the wired Logitech. The Razer is also more suitable for people with small hands in both palm and claw grip.
The Logitech G305 LIGHTSPEED and the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed are both good wireless gaming mice. The Logitech has an ambidextrous design and a slightly smaller body that’s more suitable for small and medium hands. If you’re planning to use your mouse with a different OS, it could be a better option since it’s fully compatible with both Windows and macOS. Its sensor is also more consistent, and it has a lower lift-off distance. On the other hand, the Razer has a wider CPI range and more programmable inputs with the option to set a Hypershift button. Shape-wise, the Razer should fit more hand sizes with any grip type.
The Logitech G703 LIGHTSPEED with HERO Sensor is a better gaming mouse than the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed. The Logitech is a bit smaller and lighter, and it's well-suited for a palm grip. It has a wider CPI range, less CPI variation, and a lower lift-off distance. It's also possible to use it wired or wirelessly, while the Razer is a wireless-only mouse. The Razer supports Bluetooth and uses AA batteries instead of being rechargeable, which some people may prefer. It also has a thumb rest, and its shape fits more hand sizes and grip types.
The Razer Basilisk V3 X HyperSpeed and the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed are wireless gaming mice in the same lineup. The newer Basilisk V3 X HyperSpeed has improved feet that glide better on mousepads and desks. It also introduces RGB lighting and a third side button, both features that the older Basilisk X Hyperspeed lacks.
The Logitech G502 LIGHTSPEED is a slightly better mouse than the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed. While these two mice have a very similar shape, the Logitech has a better sensor overall and more programmable buttons. It also has an unlockable wheel, and its software is fully compatible with macOS. On the other hand, the Razer is a wireless-only mouse that uses an AA battery and can't recharge. It also supports a Bluetooth connection, which the Logitech doesn't.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed and the Razer DeathAdder V2 X Hyperspeed are both wireless-only gaming mice. The Basilisk X has a more ergonomic shape and a wrist rest. It has a wider CPI range and a more precisely adjustable CPI. On the other hand, the DeathAdder V2 X has better quality mouse feet with rounded edges, a lower lift-off distance, and two CPI switching buttons on the edge of its left click. Also, it has no RGB lighting and no side grips.
The Razer Basilisk Ultimate is a better mouse than the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed. You can use the Ultimate wired or wirelessly, and it has RGB lighting, more buttons, and a better-performing sensor. On the other hand, the X can be used via Bluetooth and is typically available for much cheaper.
The Razer DeathAdder V2 is a better gaming mouse than the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed. The DeathAdder is a wired-only mouse with a sleek design that feels remarkably comfortable. It’s lighter than the Basilisk and has better feet, a wider CPI range, and a lower lift-off distance. On the other hand, the Basilisk is more versatile, and it’s a better choice for traveling, as you can connect it wirelessly via Bluetooth or with its USB receiver. It’s also well-suited for most hand-sizes using any grip type.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is a slightly better mouse than the Razer Basilisk. The X is a wireless mouse that has a lower click latency. On the other hand, the regular Basilisk has an extra programmable button and better sensor performance.
The Razer Basilisk V2 is a better gaming mouse than the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed. It features the best Razer sensor, and it's also a bit lighter than the Hyperspeed. Although the V2 doesn't offer the wireless freedom of the Hyperspeed, it's a better overall mouse for gamers.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed and the Razer DeathAdder Essential are gaming mice with different designs. The Hyperspeed is a wireless-only mouse that can connect via Bluetooth or its USB receiver. It has a wider CPI range, a more precisely adjustable CPI, and lower click latency. On the other hand, the Essential is a wired model and is significantly lighter than the Hyperspeed.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is wireless mouse in the Basilisk lineup, while the Razer Basilisk Essential is a stripped-down version of the original Razer Basilisk. If you prefer mice without cables, the Hyperspeed is a better choice since you can use it wirelessly via Bluetooth or with its receiver. Also, it has a wider CPI range, a more precisely adjustable CPI, much lower click latency, and onboard memory. On the other hand, the Essential is a wired mouse and weighs a lot less than the Hyperspeed.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed and the SteelSeries Rival 3 Wireless are two gaming mice that perform somewhat similarly even though they have very different designs. The SteelSeries is much smaller and lighter, and it has an ambidextrous shape that's very well-suited for a claw grip. On the other hand, the Razer has a right-handed design with a thumb rest, and it's well-suited for most hand sizes using any grip type. It also has a better click latency and features more programmable inputs as you can set an HyperShift button.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is a somewhat better wireless gaming mouse than the Dell Alienware AW310M. The Razer has a right-handed shape and connects wirelessly either with Bluetooth or with its USB receiver. Its feet glide more smoothly, and you can assign a HyperShift button to enable a secondary layer of commands. Performance-wise, it has a wider CPI range, a CPI you can adjust more precisely, and lower click latency. On the other hand, the Dell has an ambidextrous shape with a thumb and pinky rest. It connects wirelessly with a USB receiver only. It also has a single RGB lighting zone, while the Razer has no lighting.
The Razer Mamba Wireless is a better wireless gaming mouse than the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed. You can use the Mamba wired or wirelessly, while the X is only wireless. The Mamba also uses rechargeable batteries as opposed to AA's like the X. On the other hand, you can use the X via Bluetooth, which is great if you often use it with a laptop and don't want to use a USB receiver. The X is also suitable for every grip type with almost any hand size, while you can't use the Mamba with a fingertip grip.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is better overall for FPS gaming than the ASUS ROG Chakram, but the ASUS is a better option if you like personalizing your mouse. The Razer has more programmable buttons, and the CPI can be adjusted more precisely. It also weighs a bit less, though it's still heavy. On the other hand, the ASUS has a lower lift-off distance, and it has RGB lighting. It has a unique, programmable joystick on its left side, and it offers more personalization, letting you swap out the click switches and customize the RGB logo with your own design.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed and the Logitech G603 LIGHTSPEED are decent FPS gaming mice that perform better for the office. The two mice can only be used wirelessly via Bluetooth or their USB receiver, and both have the same number of buttons and comparable sensors. Shape-wise, the Razer is quite a bit bigger and has a thumb rest on the left side. It’s a great fit for almost any hand size or grip type. On the other hand, the Logitech is fairly heavy and is better suited for a palm grip.
The GLORIOUS Model D and the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed are right-handed gaming mice intended for different purposes. The GLORIOUS is a wired ultra-light mouse intended for fast-paced gaming and is significantly lighter than the Razer. Its feet also glide much more smoothly, and it has RGB lighting, which the Razer lacks. On the other hand, the Razer is a heavier, more versatile mouse. It connects wirelessly with a USB receiver or via Bluetooth, and it feels much sturdier. It also has a wider CPI range and allows you to adjust the CPI more precisely.
The Razer Viper is a better gaming mouse than the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed, though they both have the same sensor. The Viper has an ambidextrous design with two side buttons on each side. It’s much smaller and lighter and has more buttons and programmable inputs. However, it may not be a great fit for people with larger hands using a palm or a claw grip. On the other hand, the Hyperspeed is designed for right-handed users with a thumb rest on the left side. It’s well-suited for most hand sizes and grip types, and you can use it wired or wirelessly, making it more versatile.
The Corsair HARPOON RGB Wireless is a better gaming mouse than the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed. While the Razer is wireless-only, the Corsair can be used wireless or wired while charging. The Razer is a bit heavier and larger, which makes it better suited for palm grip. Meanwhile, the more compact and portable Corsair is best for all hand sizes with a claw grip. While the Razer has a much wider and more adjustable CPI range, the Corsair's CPI is slightly more consistent.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is a decent wireless gaming mouse, while the Mad Catz R.A.T. 4+ is a good wired gaming mouse. The Razer connects wirelessly with its USB receiver or via Bluetooth. It feels sturdier and has mouse feet that glide more smoothly. It also allows you to set a Hyper-Shift button to enable a secondary layer of commands. Performance-wise, it has a much higher maximum CPI and significantly lower click latency. On the other hand, the Mad Catz is a wired-only mouse. It has three additional buttons, including one extra side button. It also has a more consistent sensor and a lower lift-off distance.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed and the Swiftpoint Z are both good, multi-genre gaming mice. The Razer is wireless only and connects with its USB receiver or via Bluetooth. It's a bit lighter and feels sturdier. It also has mouse feet that glide more smoothly, a more precisely adjustable CPI, and lower click latency. On the other hand, the Swiftpoint Z is wired-only and has seven additional buttons plus extra inputs from pressure-sensitive controls and tilt functionality. Additionally, it has a more consistent sensor, an OLED screen, haptic feedback, and a thumb and pinky rest.
The Logitech G604 LIGHTSPEED and the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed have a similar look, but they’re for different uses. The Logitech is an excellent choice for MMO gaming. It’s heavier and better suited for medium or large hands. It has six side buttons and a total of 29 programable inputs. On the other hand, the Razer is designed for FPS gaming, though it performs better as an office mouse. Most hand sizes should be able to use it with any grip type, except for smaller hands in a fingertip grip. You can use both mice wired or wirelessly via Bluetooth or their USB receivers.
The Razer Mamba Elite is a slightly lighter-weight and wired gaming mouse, while the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is wireless-only. They're both great for all hand sizes with palm grip, though the X is better in claw grip for small hands, and both will likely only be comfortable for medium or larger hands with a fingertip grip. They have the same customizable CPI range and almost the same click latency. While they both have two additional side buttons, the Elite has more programmable buttons overall due to the CPI switch buttons on top and its L/R tilt mouse wheel.
The Razer Atheris and the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed are two very different mice. The Atheris is a very compact mouse that's great for bringing with you on the go. It has an ambidextrous design that's well-suited for a fingertip grip, though people with extra-large hands may have difficulty using it because of its small design. On the other hand, the Basilisk is a lighter and more versatile gaming mouse. It has an ergonomic shape, with a right-handed slant and a thumb rest. It feels more comfortable overall, and most hand sizes can use it with any grip type. Performance-wise, it has a wider CPI range that you can adjust more precisely and better click latency.
Test Results
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed looks basically identical to the Razer Basilisk Ultimate, except with no RGB lighting. It also doesn't feature the sniper button on the left side of the mouse. It has the same right-handed ergonomic design with a thumb rest.
While most people will likely keep the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed at home with their gaming setup, its wireless design and reasonably small footprint mean you should be able to fit it in most bags or larger laptop cases, should you need to.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed's build quality is excellent, and it feels the same as the much more expensive Razer Basilisk Ultimate, which is great. The main difference between the two is that the Ultimate has better quality feet, though this may not be a huge deal to everyone. The only wobble you hear when you shake the mouse is from the battery, though this isn't noticeable in regular use.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is fairly heavy. The Default Weight result includes an AA Amazon rechargeable battery which weighs 15.10g. The Lowest Weight result is obtained using an aluminum foil ball adapter to allow for the use of AAA batteries. The aluminum foil ball used to obtain this result has a reference weight of 0.2g and a diameter of 5.8mm. The AAA battery used is an Energizer Ultimate Lithium battery with a reference weight of 7.60g.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed's ergonomics are great. This right-handed mouse has a slight slant to it, and a thumb rest on the left-hand side.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is a wireless-only mouse than can be used via Bluetooth or with its included USB receiver. Unfortunately, it doesn't have a rechargeable battery built-in and uses a single AA battery. Razer claims a single AA battery will last 450 hours on Bluetooth, or 285 hours when using the USB receiver, though we don't currently test this.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is a wireless-only mouse that cannot be plugged in.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed has six buttons, all of which are programmable, including the up and down scroll on the mouse wheel. You can also assign a HyperShift button to give a second layer of programmed buttons.
The Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed has superb click latency when connected with its USB receiver. The click latency is noticeably higher and less consistent when connected via Bluetooth. However, this is normal, and a Bluetooth connection isn't recommended for reaction-based gaming.
The mouse wheel on the Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed is mediocre. While the scroll itself is quite clicky, unlike the regular Razer Basilisk or the Razer Basilisk Ultimate, there is no scroll adjustment slider on the bottom of the mouse to change this, which is a shame. A full scroll of the mouse wheel from front to back will result in around 10 or 11 clicks.
Update 11/23/2020: We previously indicated that there's no on-board memory, which is wrong. It has been corrected.
This mouse is compatible with Razer Synapse 3, which is a great piece of software. It has onboard memory, which allows you to access your custom profiles on other computers that don't have Synapse 3 installed. However, you can only save the sensitivity settings and remapped keyboard/mouse functions, not macros.
Since Razer Synapse 3 is only compatible with Windows, you can only customize it on a Windows computer. If you want to access your custom profiles on a Mac, you need to customize the mouse first on a Windows computer and save the settings onto the the on-board memory.