The Sennheiser RS 195 are decently comfortable home theater headphones that unfortunately do not improve much on previous designs. They perform worse overall than the RS 165 but have a slightly better sound than the RS 175. They also have a greater wireless range but the highest latency of the RS series. This makes their asking price a bit unjustified, especially when compared to the previous models.
The design of the RS 195 is almost identical to the that of the RS 165 with slightly better materials used in their build quality. They're notably heavier than the previous models which make them even more unstable to use under physical activity. Unfortunately, they don't have the soft fabric padding on the ear cups like RS 185, but they're still comfortable enough to wear for decently long listening sessions.
The RS 195 look practically identical to the RS 165. They don't have the textured back of RS 175 and they're not open like the 185. The biggest difference comes with their stand which has two dials; one for balance and another to switch between personal hearing profiles. They feel a bit more premium than the RS 165 thanks to some minor finishing touches and their much heavier build. Overall, like the rest of the RS series, they're kind of bulky headphones not meant for outdoor use.
The RS 195 are the heaviest headphones in the RS series. They also use the same padding as that of the RS 165 and 175 which s not as soft as that of the RS 185. However, they're still comfortable headphones with spacious ear cups that should fit comfortably around most listeners ears. Unfortunately, they have the same issue of poor pressure distribution which causes a bit of soreness between your ear lobes and your jaw. It's not painfully uncomfortable, but it's not ideal either.
The RS 195 have an efficient controls scheme, but it's slightly limited. Like the rest of the RS series, they can not take calls or play/pause your music. However, the buttons provided are responsive and offer functionality for volume control, and toggling between music and speech modes. They also have two dials on their stand that control balance and switching "personal hearing" profiles A-G and normal hearing.
The RS series are not portable headphones. Like the previous models the RS 195 are quite large, they don't fold, and you need the stand for them actually to work. You most likely won't be carrying them around on your person.
The RS 195 look identical to the RS 165 but their build quality feels a bit more premium. The ear cups are heavier and feel a bit denser. Like the previous models, the headband is decently flexible and reinforced with a thin metal frame. Their build quality feels solid enough that they won't get easily damaged by accidental drops but when compared to other headphones in their price range, they do not feel as sturdy, or durable.
The RS 195 are not stable headphones. They're notably heavier than all the other models and while they're a bit tighter than the RS 185 they still sway too much during physical activity to be stable headphones for sports. Also, they need to be in range to their charging dock so sports in general with these headphones is impractical.
The a good Mid Range, a decent Distortion performance but a slightly overpowering Bass. Also, their Treble could be better balanced and their Bass performance is very inconsistent. It varies widely depending on the user's positioning preferences, and whether you wear glasses. Additionally, like most other closed-back headphones, they don't have an open Soundstage which is favored for critical listening applications.
Poor Consistency. Like the closed-back RS 165 and RS 175, the RS 195 shows a big variance in their Bass performance. The maximum amount of variance in the Bass Range at 20Hz is about 18dB. The red line shows one of our humans subjects that wears glasses. The Treble Range consistency however, is good.
The RS 195 only passively isolate against ambient noise. Thanks to their closed-back design they isolate more and leak less than the RS 185, but they still have a somewhat poor isolation performance. They won't be the ideal theater headphones if you have a noisy home environment and their level of leakage may be distracting to the people around you at higher volumes.
Poor Isolation. Like most other Over-Ear non-noise cancelling headphones, the RS 195 doesn't block any noise in the Bass Range. In the Mid Range they achieve 12dB of isolation which is above average. They also reduce the Treble noise by about 30dB which is good. However, the RS 195 has one of the highest amount of self-noise we have measured so far, which may be noticeable on quieter tracks/movies.
Average Leakage performance. The significant portion of the leakage sits between 400Hz and 4KHz which is an average range considering the Over-Ear design of these headphones. The overall level of leakage is also not too loud and above average.
The Sennheiser RS 195 have a slightly better wireless range than the previous models but they also have more latency. The latency is still good enough for watching movies but may become an issue when gaming. As for their battery life, they use two rechargeable AAA batteries that can be charged directly with the stand. Unfortunately, it takes really a long time to charge them that way and varies depending on the capacity, age, and wear of the batteries. They also don't have the best range when the RF transmitter stand is obstructed.
The RS 195, like the rest of the RS series, have a good battery life. They lasted about 19 hours which is a bit shorter than the previous models but should be sufficient for most extended listening sessions. They also use rechargeable AAA batteries that can be charged with the stand. Unfortunately, it takes more than 8 hours for a full charge which is very limiting, but the charge time is heavily dependent on the capacity, age and wear of the rechargeable batteries. On the upside, you can always just swap out the AAA with new non-rechargeable batteries which may be less cost effective but has 0 charge time.
No compatible app.
The RS 195 looks like the RS 165 but with a better build quality. Unfortunately, they might not be worth the upgrade as they perform slightly worse in sound, isolation, and latency. It's not a big difference but it's notable enough that the price gap doesn't feel justified. On the upside, they a slightly better wireless range and a few more features on the stand that are not available on the previous models.
Average for neutral listening. They have a lot more bass than the previous models which may make some movies a bit more exciting but it's not ideal for neutral listeners. They have a great mid-range and thanks to the "personal hearing" profiles you can somewhat alter the bass to better suit your listening preferences. But overall, due to their bass-oriented sound and subpar Soundstage they're not as good as the RS 165 or the RS 185 for neutral listening.
Mediocre for commuting and traveling. The fact that you must have the transmitter in range means they won't be the ideal headphones to use anywhere but at home or at the office in front of your TV or PC.
Not intended for sports. They have a fixed transmitter, they're bulky and a bit unstable which is not ideal for running or working out.
Average for office use. They have a decent line-of-sight range, and they're comfortable and easy-to-use. However, they're a bit leaky and don't isolate enough for particularly noisy office environments.