Mpow H5 Wireless Headphones Review

Tested using Methodology v1.4
Reviewed Sep 19, 2018 at 11:19 am
Mpow H5 Wireless Picture
Mixed Usage
Neutral Sound
Wireless Gaming
Wired Gaming
Phone Calls
Type Over-ear
Enclosure Closed-Back
Wireless Yes
Noise Cancelling Yes
Mic Yes
Transducer Dynamic

The Mpow H5 Active Noise Cancelling are decent mixed usage headphones with an above-average sound for their budget price tag. They are not quite as budget as the Mpow Bluetooth Over-Ear 059, but they look and feel more premium and have better sound quality. They're also noise canceling headphones but unfortunately, their ANC is not strong enough for canceling the ambient noise of most commutes and noisy environments. They're also a bit tight on the head, but on the upside, they have decent battery life, an easy-to-use control scheme and a unique look that will work for some.

Our Verdict

6.6 Mixed Usage

Decent for mixed usage. They have simple and easy to use over-ear design that's decently well built and feels more premium than the Mpow 059. They also sound above-average with most tracks and have decent battery life. Unfortunately, they are not the most comfortable and their noise canceling feature is fairly lackluster so they won't be the best choice for commute and travel.

  • Above-average sound quality.
  • Easy to use.
  • Below-average microphone.
  • Subpar noise canceling.
  • Tight fit.
6.5 Neutral Sound

Above-average for neutral listening. The H5 have a surprisingly good sound that's decently balanced. They lack a bit of sub-bass and their mid-range can sound a bit boomy since the bass over-extends into the mid-range. They also have a dip that pushes instrumentals to the back of the mix although overall they sound decently well balanced and should sound good enough for most listeners. They won't be the ideal choice for more neutral listeners since they do not have a very spacious soundstage and do not come with an EQ to tweak their sound but on the upside, their default sound should be good enough for most.

6.9 Commute/Travel

Average for commuting. The Mpow H5 are fairly easy to use and decently portable. Unfortunately, their noise cancellation is not strong enough for the noisy environments involved in commuting. They're also a bit tight on the head which may not be as comfortable to wear for long trips.

7.0 Sports/Fitness

Average for sports. They're wireless with an easy to use control scheme. However, despite being fairly tight on the head they are not the most stable headphones for more demanding exercises and workout routines.

6.6 Office

Average for office-use. They sound decent and have an efficient and easy to use control scheme. However, they won't block the noise of a particularly lively office since their noise cancellation is fairly weak. They're also not the most comfortable headphones to wear for long listening sessions.

5.0 Wireless Gaming

Subpar for gaming. The Mpow H5 have a bit too much latency, they're not compatible with consoles via Bluetooth and cannot be customized to the extent of other gaming headphones. They also have a below average integrated microphone.

6.7 Wired Gaming
6.0 Phone Calls
  • 6.6 Mixed Usage
  • 6.5 Neutral Sound
  • 6.9 Commute/Travel
  • 7.0 Sports/Fitness
  • 6.6 Office
  • 5.0 Wireless Gaming
  • 6.7 Wired Gaming
  • 6.0 Phone Calls
  1. Updated Feb 18, 2020: Converted to Test Bench 1.4.
  2. Updated Nov 21, 2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.1.
  3. Updated Nov 21, 2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.

Test Results

perceptual testing image

The Mpow H5 are simple over-ears with a unique backplate design for their ear cups. The headband is relatively wide and low profile once on your head, and the cups are fairly small and do not protrude like some of the other over-ears we've tested. The plastic used in their build quality looks fairly well-made and decently high-end for their price. However, the unique backplate, which might work for some, is glossy and somewhat clashes with the rest of the design. It makes the headphones feel a bit cheap overall which would have looked much more premium if it was a matte coating like the headband and hinges. Overall, they look decently well made and feel a lot more expensive than the Mpow 059.

Weight 0.5 lbs
Clamping Force
1.2 lbs

The Mpow H5 are decently comfortable over-ears but they're a bit tight on the head. They're lightweight and decently well-padded especially the headband. The earpads are a bit stiff but not enough to be uncomfortable. Unfortunately, the cups themselves are not very spacious and the headband is a little too tight on the head for some. The tight fit may loosen over time, with regular use, but out-of-the-box they won't be as comfortable as some of the other over-ears we've tested. The newer model H10 is slightly more comfortable than the H5.

OS Compatibility
Not OS specific
Ease Of Use Good
Feedback Decent
Call/Music Control Yes
Volume Control Yes
Microphone Control No
Channel Mixing
Noise Cancelling Control On/Off
Additional Controls No

The control scheme of the Mpow H5 is simple and efficient. It provides all the necessary functions for a Bluetooth headphone; track-skipping, volume control, and a multi-purpose power/Bluetooth and call/music management button. There's also an ANC switch on left ear cup to enable and disable the noise cancellation feature. The buttons all deliver decent feedback but they are slightly cramped on the bottom of the right ear cup but do not take long to get used to.

Avg.Temp.Difference 5.6 C

The Mpow H5 are not very breathable headphones. They create a fairly good seal around your ears and have a closed back around the ear design that prevents a lot of airflow. They will make you sweat a bit more than average if you use them while working out and your ears will get warm after a couple of hours of critical listening. They are not much worse than other closed back over-ears with nonporous pads, but they won't be ideal for more intense exercises. If you are looking for budget over-ear headphones for working out, they're a decent option though.

L 4.8 "
W 6 "
H 2.6 "
Volume 75 Cu. Inches
Transmitter Required No

The Mpow H5 fold into a more compact format that's decently portable. They won't be the easiest headphones to carry around on your person, but they will easily fit into a gym bag or backpack.

Type Hard case
L 4.9 "
W 6.2 "
H 3.4 "
Volume 108 Cu. Inches

The Mpow H5 come with a good hard case that will protect the headphone from scratches impacts and drops as well as minor water damage. The case is a little bulky but should be portable enough to easily carry around in a backpack.

Build Quality

The Mpow H5 have a decent build quality that feels more high-end and durable than the Mpow 059. The headband is a relatively wide and well-padded plastic and metal build that should be durable enough for most use cases. The ear cups are also decently dense, and even the back plates feel sturdy although they do look a bit cheap and will accumulate scratches over time which won't be ideal for long-term use. Unfortunately, the hinges and yokes are a little thin and look like the most susceptible place where the headphones would get damaged.


These headphones are decently stable thanks to their tight fit and relatively low profile. They do not move much during casual activities and are stable enough for the occasional jog and even for some exercises at the gym. However, they are not sports headphones so during more intense work out sessions they will slip off your ears from time to time especially when tilting your head a lot or while lying down. The headband will slide, and you may have to adjust the fit, but on the upside, they are wireless so they won't get yanked off your head because the audio cable got hooked on something.

Headshots 1
Headshots 2
In The Box

  • Mpow H5 Headset Headphones
  • Carrying case
  • Audio cable
  • USB cable
  • Manual


Sound Profile
Bass Amount
-0.79 db
Treble Amount
-1.56 db
Frequency Response Consistency
Avg. Std. Deviation
0.54 dB

The frequency response consistency is above-average. Similar to the Sony WH-1000XM3 and QuietComfort 35 II, the H5 seem to be using its noise cancelling system to check for bass consistency. Therefore, in the bass range, they perform very consistently across our five human subjects. Their treble delivery is also quite consistent, but not as much as the bass range, showing more than 6dB of deviation below 10KHz.

Raw Frequency Response
Bass Accuracy
Std. Err.
5.85 dB
Low-Frequency Extension
16.82 Hz
0.39 dB
5.66 dB
9.11 dB

The bass is very good. LFE (low-frequency extension) is at 26Hz, which is very good. Low-bass, responsible for the thump and rumble common to bass heavy music and sound effects is lacking by about 2.5dB. This won't be very noticeable but means that the H5 lacks a bit of sub-bass. Mid-bass, responsible for the body of bass guitars and the punch of kick drums is hyped by about 2dB. High-bass, responsible for warmth, is overemphasized by more than 4dB. Overall, the bass of the Mpow is heavy and decently balanced, but a bit boomy and muddy sounding.

Mid Accuracy
Std. Err.
4.68 dB
7.28 dB
0.49 dB
2.53 dB

The mid-range is good. The overall response is decently balanced and even. However, low-mid is overemphasized by about 4dB, making vocals and lead instruments a bit thick sounding, and the overall mix a little muddy. The dip centered around 900Hz nudges vocals and lead towards the back of the mix and gives more emphasis to the lower frequencies.

Treble Accuracy
Std. Err.
4.36 dB
3.08 dB
3.82 dB
-0.89 dB

The Mpow H5 have a good treble response. Low-treble is quite even and flat and within 0.4dB of our neutral target. However, mid-treble, responsible for sibilances (S and T sounds) is uneven resulting in the overemphasis of some sibilances and the underemphasis of some others.

1.91 db
1.83 db
Weighted Group Delay
Weighted Amplitude Mismatch
Weighted Frequency Mismatch
Weighted Phase Mismatch

The Mpow H5 have great imaging. Their weighted group delay is 0.4, which is very good. The graph also shows that except for the sub-bass region the group delay is below our audibility threshold. This makes their bass a little slow, but won't be very noticeable, but their treble will be transparent. Additionally, the L/R drivers of our test unit were well-matched in amplitude, frequency, and phase response, which is important for the accurate placement and localization of objects (voices, instruments, video games effects) in the stereo image.

Passive Soundstage
PRTF Accuracy (Std. Dev.)
3.97 dB
PRTF Size (Avg.)
6.32 dB
PRTF Distance
11.8 dB
Acoustic Space Excitation

The soundstage of the H5 is mediocre. The PRTF graph shows some degree of pinna interaction and activation, but the response is not very accurate. Also, there's not a notch present at the 10KHz region. This, and their closed-back design, results in a soundstage that may be perceived as unnatural and located inside the listener's head.

Virtual Soundstage
Head Modeling
Speaker Modeling
Room Ambience
Head Tracking
Virtual Surround
No App
Weighted Harmonic Distortion
WHD @ 90
WHD @ 100
Test Settings
SBC, 16-bit, 48kHz
Noise Isolation
Isolation Audio
Overall Attenuation
-16.36 dB
-10.39 dB
-10.25 dB
-28.14 dB

The active noise cancellation performance is sub-par unlike some of the other headsets within the same price range like the Anker SoundCore Space NC or the Cowin E7 Pro. You can also take a look at the newer model H10, or the TaoTronics TT-BH060, for better noise isolation performance. With their ANC enabled, they achieve about 10dB of isolation in the bass range. This means they will do an average job in reducing the rumble of airplane and bus engines. In the mid-range, important for canceling out speech, they provide 10dB of isolation, which is also average. In the treble range, occupied by sharp sounds like S and Ts, they reduce outside noise by more than 28dB, which is above-average.

Leakage Audio
Overall Leakage @ 1ft
42.2 dB

The leakage performance is about average. The significant portion of the leakage is spread between 400Hz and 4KHz, which is a relatively broad range. However, the overall level of the leakage is not very loud. With the music at 100db SPL, the leakage at 1 foot away averages at 42dB SPL and peaks at 60dB SPL, which is noticeably above the noise floor of an average office.

Microphone Style
Detachable Boom
Recording Quality
Recorded Speech
153.22 Hz
FR Std. Dev.
7.13 dB
2673.34 Hz
Weighted THD
31.16 dB

The recording quality of the H5's integrated microphone is sub-par. With our test signal, this mic captures excessive amounts of bass and mid-range, making the sound muddy and prone to pops and rumbling noises. The HFE (high-frequency extension) of 2.6KHz results in a recorded/transmitted speech that is noticeably muffled and lacking in detail.

Noise Handling
Speech + Pink Noise
Speech + Subway Noise
10.75 dB

The microphone of the Mpow H5 is mediocre at noise handling. In our SpNR test, it achieved a speech-to-noise ratio of 11dB SPL, indicating that this mic is best suited for quiet environments as it may struggle to fully separate speech from ambient noise even in moderately loud places.

Active Features
Active Features
Battery Type
Continuous Battery Life
12 hrs
Additional Charges
Total Battery Life
12 hrs
Charge Time
2.3 hrs
Power-Saving Feature
Audio While Charging
Passive Playback
Charging Port micro-USB

The Mpow H5 have a decent battery life. We measured up to 12 hours of continuous play time with ANC and Bluetooth enabled although they were marketed as 9 hours of battery life (when ANC and BT enabled) and 15 when used wired with ANC. It's within the ballpark, and your performance will vary depending on the volume at which you listen. They have a fast charge time of 2.3 which is pretty decent for an over-ear but do not have any power saving features which is slightly disappointing. On the upside, you can use them completely passively when the battery dies.

Active Features
App Support
App Name No App
iOS No
Android No
macOS No
Windows No
ANC Control
Mic Control No
Room Effects
Playback Control
Button Mapping No
Surround Support

These headphones do not come with an app for added customization options.

Bluetooth Version
Multi-Device Pairing
2 Devices
NFC Pairing
Line Of Sight Range
104 ft
PC Latency (SBC)
130 ms
PC Latency (aptX)
PC Latency (aptX HD)
PC Latency (aptX-LL)
iOS Latency
148 ms
Android Latency
133 ms

These Bluetooth headphones support multi-device pairing but not NFC.

These headphones do not support any additional codecs. This means their base SBC latency is 130ms which is fine for streaming music but maybe become an issue when watching videos or gaming. The slight sync issues are even more prominent on high frame rate content.

Non-Bluetooth Wireless
Non-BT Line Of Sight Range
Non-BT Latency
Analog Audio
USB Audio
Detachable Yes
Length 4.1 ft
Connection 1/8" TRS
Analog/USB Audio Latency
0 ms

The Mpow H5 come with an audio cable with no in-line microphone or USB adapter. This means they do not have mic support on consoles and PCs.

PC / PS4 Compatibility
PC/PS4 Analog
Audio Only
PC/PS4 Wired USB
PC/PS4 Non-BT Wireless
Xbox One Compatibility
Xbox One Analog
Audio Only
Xbox One Wired USB
Xbox One Non-BT Wireless
No Base/Dock
USB Input
Line In
Line Out
Optical Input
RCA Input
Dock Charging
Power Supply
No Base/Dock

These headphones do not have a base/dock. If you want a versatile headset with a base that you can also use wired, check out the Arctis 7 by SteelSeries.

Compared To Other Headphones

Comparison picture

The Mpow H5 are decent mixed usage headset with an above average sound and build quality. They have a cool looking design that feels more premium than the Mpow 059 Bluetooth Over-Ear, however, the glossy backplates may not be ideal for everyone. They also have a decent battery life, good controls, and a somewhat comfortable design although they are bit tight on some heads. Unfortunately, their build quality is not quite as good as some of the budget headphones compared below and their noise canceling is mediocre-at-best, only capable of reducing some sounds but not a lot of ambient chatter or high frequencies. See our recommendations for the best over-ear headphones under $50, the best over-ear headphones under $100, and the best wireless headphones.

Mpow 059 Wireless

The Mpow H5 are better headphones overall when compared to the Mpow Bluetooth Over-Ear. The H5 have a more premium look, a better-balanced sound quality, and a more compact form factor. They're also noise cancelling headphones, but their ANC is not very strong. On the other hand, the Mpow Bluetooth Over-Ear have a more comfortable fit that's not as tight on the head. They also have a longer battery life on average and do not leak as much as the H5 since they create a better seal around your ears. They're also a better value for your money at their current price point.

Cowin E7 Wireless

The Mpow H5 Wireless are better budget noise cancelling headphone than the Cowin E7 Wireless. The Cowin have a better noise cancelling performance and a longer battery life. The Cowin also have a lightly clearer mic and a better isolation performance overall, since they also leak a little less. On the other hand, the Mpow look and feel a bit more premium, have better and less confusing controls, and also have a more comfortable fit even if they're a little tight on the head. The Mpow also have much better sound.

Bluedio T4 Turbine Wireless

The Mpow H5 Wireless are a better headset overall compared to the Bluedio T4 Turbine Wireless. The Bluedio have a better build quality that's surprising for their price range. They also have a deeper, more powerful bass range that some may prefer, and a stronger isolation performance for commuting. On the other hand, the Mpow have a more compact design that fits better on most people even if they are a little tight. They also have a better-balanced sound and easier to use controls. Their latency is also much better than the Bluedio, although they will still not be the best option for watching movies and gaming.

TaoTronics TT-BH060 Wireless

The TaoTronics TT-BH060 have a better noise cancelling feature than the Mpow H5 Wireless and they are slightly better-built as well. They have noticeably better battery life and also feel more comfortable. However, our unit had mismatched drivers, so the Mpow H5 are the better-sounding option. They also have very low latency for Bluetooth headphones and offer good value.

Bose QuietComfort 35/QC35 Wireless 2016

The Bose QuietComfort 35/QC35 Wireless 2016 are a much better noise canceling headphone than the Mpow H5 Wireless. The Bose have a better, more comfortable over-ear fit. They also isolate a lot better in noisy environments, with a much more efficient noise cancelling feature. They're easier to use, last longer on a single charge, and have a better-balanced sound that packs a lot of bass without sounding as boomy as the Mpow. On the other hand, the Mpow are a better value on a budget. They also have a more compact design and a unique shape for the backplates that some may prefer.

Mpow H10 Wireless

The Mpow H10 are better versatile headphones than the similar Mpow H5 model. The overall design of the H10 is better and more comfortable, and their ANC feature blocks more ambient noise than the H5. While both headphones feel fairly plasticky, the overall feel of the H5 is slightly better and they don’t make a breaking sound when folding them. Sound-wise, the H10 are slightly more balanced, especially in the bass range. They also have a way better battery life, but you can connect the H5 to two devices, which you can’t do with the H10.

Sony WH-CH400 Wireless

The Mpow H5 Wireless are better headphones than the Sony WH-CH400. These over-ears offer great value thanks to their ANC feature. They are more comfortable than the Sony on-ears and will also have a decent sound quality, on top of being noticeably better-built. Their design is more stable due to larger cups, and their latency is fairly low for Bluetooth headphones. On the other hand, the WH-CH400 support NFC for quicker and easier pairing, and they have better sound quality as well. However, you can’t use them wired like you can do with the Mpow H5, which may be a deal-breaker for some.

Cowin SE7 Wireless

The Mpow H5 Wireless are better-sounding headphones than the Cowin SE7 Wireless and can also be connected simultaneously to two devices, which can be useful. Other than that, the two headphones are fairly similar in terms of controls and noise isolation. However, the Cowin seem to be a bit more comfortable, thanks to their soft padding. Their build quality seems a bit more durable, which explains their slightly more expensive price point. If sound is your biggest criteria, get the Mpow, but if durability and comfort are most important, the Cowin would still please most users, especially fans of bass-heavy music.

Sony WH-CH500 Wireless

The Mpow H5 are better headphones than the Sony WH-CH500. They have a more stable fit thanks to the over-ear design, and they also block more ambient noise with their ANC feature, making them a better choice for commuting and office work. Their build quality is decent and a bit more high-end than their price suggests, and they can also be used wired. They also have better sound quality. On the other hand, the Sonys have better battery life, wireless range, and a better microphone for calls.

+ Show more