The Shure SE215 are decent critical listening in-ears that perform better than the higher-end models in the same lineup. They have almost an identical design to the SE315 and SE425 but do not come with as many accessories. On the upside, they have a better-balanced sound, and they isolate a bit more in noisy conditions. They also have stable ear-hooks and a comfortable in-ear fit which makes them a decent option for commuting and sports. Unfortunately, the lack of in-line controls is a bit limiting.
The Shure SE215 are well designed wired in-ears, with a durable build quality and a comfortable fit. They do not come with as many tip options as the more premium SE425, but their angled design and decent foam tips make them more comfortable than typical in-ears. They're also worn like an ear-hook design, which makes them a stable option for the gym although they are wired, and the cable could get tangled in your clothes or yank the earbuds out of your ears if it gets hooked by something. Unfortunately, they do not come with an additional cable in the box, and they have no control scheme so they won't be the best option to use with your mobile phone while exercising.
The Shure SE215 look identical to the higher-end SE315 and SE425. They have the same angled earbuds to better fit the contours of your ears, and a pseudo-ear-hook design that makes them a stable choice for sports. The earbuds look and feel premium and the audio cable is thick, heavily rubberized and detachable. Like the SE425, they have a transparent variation that stands out a bit more than the all-black color scheme, but both schemes are fairly understated and will work for most listeners.
The Shure SE215 have a comfortable in-ear fit. They come with multiple tip sizes to help you find the right fit, and they have an angled design to better fit the contours of your ears. This makes them more comfortable than typical in-ears, although they do not come with as many tip sizes as the more premium SE315 and SE425. Also, if you're not a big fan of in-ears, they may still get a bit fatiguing after wearing them for a while.
These headphones do not have a control scheme and do not come with an extra cable with an inline remote.
These headphones, like most in-ear models, are very breathable and will not make you sweat more than usual even during more strenuous activities. They have an ear hook design, but the hooks are thin and do not have as many points of contact with your ear as some of the other similarly designed headphones we've tested, like the Anker Soundcore Spirit X.
These headphones, unlike the SE425, come with a decent soft case instead of a sturdy hard one. It's decently portable and protects the headphones from impacts and drops but will not shield them from water damage. It also adds a fair bit of bulk, but since it's a soft case you can more easily squeeze into tight spaces than with the hard case of the SE425.
The Shure SE215, like the rest of the SE lineup, have good build quality for an in-ear design. They have a thick, durable cable, and decently dense ear buds. The cable is also removable which is relatively rare for in-ears and makes the headphones a lot more durable since you can always buy a replacement, if the cable gets damaged by regular wear and tear. You can even purchase an adapter cable to make them wireless. Unfortunately, no extra cables are provided in the box which is somewhat disappointing.
The SE215 are stable, wired in-ear headphones. They have a pseudo-ear-hook design that's flexible and not as stiff as other ear-hook models like the Anker SoundBuds Curve. This makes them stable enough for sports and working out since they will rarely fall out of your ears unless you physically pull them out or the audio cable gets hooked on something.
The Shure SE215 are an average sounding pair of closed-back in-ear headphones. They have a very good, deep, and consistent bass, an even and well-balanced mid-range, and an average treble. However, they tend to sound muddy and cluttered in the upper bass/lower mid-range which will negatively affect vocals by making the sound too thick, and they lack a bit of detail and presence in the treble range. Overall, they would be a decent choice for most genres, especially bass heavy ones, but not ideal for vocal-centric music. Also, like most other in-ear headphones, they don't have a large and speaker-like soundstage.
The bass is very good. LFE (low-frequency extension) is at 10Hz, which is excellent. Low-bass, responsible for the thump and rumble common to bass-heavy tracks is within 1.3dB of our target, which is great. Mid-bass, responsible for the body of bass guitars and the punch of kick drums is also within 1dB of our neutral target. However, high-bass, responsible for warmth, is overemphasized by 5dB which makes the bass quite boomy and muddy sounding.
The mid-range of the SE 215 is good. The 4dB bump in low-mid is actually the continuation of the high-bass overemphasis. This tends to thicken the vocals and lead instruments and make the overall mix sound cluttered. However, mid-mid and high-mid are much better balanced, meaning the upper harmonics of vocals/leads will be reproduced properly.
The treble performance is mediocre. The overall response is a little uneven throughout the range. Low-treble is decently balanced, but the narrow peak around 5KHz could make certain sounds a bit too intense. The relatively wide dip around 7KHz negatively affects the presence and brightness of certain sounds, especially S and Ts. Conversely, the peak around 10KHz could make some S and Ts a bit sharp and piercing.
The frequency response consistency is excellent. If the user is able to achieve a proper fit and an air-tight seal using the assortment of tips that come with the headphones, then they should be able to get consistent bass and treble delivery every time they use the headphones.
The imaging performance of the SE 215 is excellent. The weighted group delay is at 0.08, which is very low. The GD graph also shows that the entire group delay response is below the audibility threshold. This ensures a tight bass and a transparent treble reproduction. Additionally, the L/R drivers of our test unit were very well-matched, which is important for the accurate placement and localization of objects (instruments, voice, footsteps), in the stereo image.
The soundstage is poor. This is because creating an out-of-head and speaker-like soundstage is largely dependent on activating the resonances of the pinna (outer ear). The design of in-ears and earbuds is in such a way that fully bypasses the pinna and doesn't interact with it. Also, because these headphones have a closed-back enclosure, their soundstage won't be perceived to be as open as that of open-back earbuds like the Apple AirPods, Google Pixel Buds, or the Bose SoundSport Free.
The Shure SE 215 have a very good harmonic distortion performance. In the bass range, they show very little THD, even under heavy loads. This suggests that the Shure could take a few dB of EQ boost in the bass range before distorting. The peak in THD around 1KHz, however, is rather elevated and could make the region sound a bit harsh and fatiguing.
The Shure SE215 isolate better passively than some of the active noise cancelling headphones we've tested. They will be suitable to use in loud, noisy environments and while commuting and traveling, especially if you have a little music playing. They also barely leak, which makes them great headphones to use in quiet settings like an office or when you don't want to distract those around you.
The isolation performance of the Shure SE215 is great. Although these in-ears don't have an active noise cancelling (ANC) system, they provide an impressive amount of isolation. In the bass range, where the rumble of airplane and bus engines sits, they achieve 15dB of isolation, which is good. In the mid-range, important for blocking out speech, they isolate by more than 23dB, which is excellent. In the treble range, occupied by sharp sounds like S and Ts, they reduce outside noise by more than 36dB, which is very good. However, like most other passively isolating headphones, they aren't very effective around 200Hz.
The leakage performance is excellent. Like most other closed-back in-ears, these headphones don't leak in the bass and mid-ranges. The significant portion of their leakage is in the treble range and between 4KHz and 6KHz, which is a very narrow range. The overall level of the leakage is very quiet too. With the music at 100dB SPL, the leakage at 1 foot away averages at 22dB SPL and peaks at around 34dB SPL, which is about the same as the noise floor of most offices.
These headphones do not have a microphone so the recording quality has not been tested.
The SE215 do not have a microphone so the noise handling has not been tested.
These headphones have no active features and therefore do not require a battery. They also do not have a dedicated app or software support for added customization options.
These are passive headphones with no active components and no battery.
The SE215 do not have a compatible app or software support for added customization options.
The Shure SE215 are not Bluetooth headphones and do not come with a base or dock. They have a wired 1/8TRS connection with no in-line remote so they will only provide audio when connected to your devices or consoles. Unfortunately, since they're wired, they won't have the range and convenience of wireless headphones for gaming or watching movies, but on the upside, they have practically no latency like most wired headphones.
These headphones are wired and do not have a Bluetooth connection. If you want a good Bluetooth headset for more casual use, check out the Sony WH-1000XM2.
The Shure SE215 have a simple 1/8" TRS audio cable with no in-line remote or mic so they will only provide audio when connected to your phone, PC or console controllers.
These headphones do not have a dock. If you need a headphone with a dock that also has a wired connection for gaming or watching movies, then consider the SteelSeries Arctis 7.
These are passive headphones that do not have a wireless range since they're wired. If you want a good wireless headphone for critical listening, consider the Plantronics BackBeat Pro 2.
The Shure SE215 have a simple wired connection with practically no latency. Unfortunately, this also means that they're limited by the range of the provided cables.
The Shure SE215 are decent critical listening in-ears, versatile enough for most use cases thanks to their simple wired design. They have a more comfortable fit than typical in-ear headphones, and if you get the right combination of tip size and proper placement, they will passively isolate better than some of the best noise canceling headphones we've tested. They have a durable build quality with a detachable cable you can replace if it gets damaged. Their sound quality is also a bit better than the higher-end models in the same lineup, but they are not the best sounding in-ears within their price range, especially when compared to some of the cheaper options below. See our recommendations for the best earbuds and the best budget earbuds and in-ears.
The KZ ZS-10 are a better sounding critical listening in-ear than the Shure SE215. The ZS10 have a slightly more premium-looking design and a better-balanced sound. The SE215, on the other hand, have a slightly more comfortable fit and better noise isolation than the KZ. However, while both headphones are well-built in-ears, with no in-line remotes, the better sound quality of the KZ makes them the better option, especially since they are a lot cheaper than the SE215.
The KZ AS-10 are better sounding headphones than the Shure SE215. They also look better and have a better build quality, thanks to the braided and replaceable cable. You can also find a variant of the AS-10 in an in-line remote and mic, which the SE215 lacks. However, the SE215 are more comfortable and offer slightly better noise isolation. The better sound quality and cheaper price make the AS-10 a better choice over the SE215.
The Sennheiser Momentum In-Ear are slightly better and more versatile headphones than the Shure SE215. The Shures have a better sound quality overall, and they're more comfortable thanks to the angled earbuds. They also have a much more durable build quality than the HD1 In-Ear. However, the HD1 In-Ear have an in-line remote, which provides control for iOS devices and has a microphone for taking calls, making them more versatile for everyday casual use. They also come with a better case than the Shures and have a slightly more compact design.
If sound quality is your only or most important factor, the TIN Audio T2 are better headphones, but otherwise, the Shure SE215 are more comfortable, come with a nice case, are more stable, and isolate a lot more noise than the TIN Audio. They also have a detachable cable like the T2, and you can find third-party cables with an in-line remote and mic too. However, they are more expensive than the TIN Audios.
The Shure SE215 are slightly better critical listening than the Etymotic hf5. They have a more comfortable fit with angled earbuds that better fit the contours of your ears. The Shures also have a better-balanced sound quality with a stronger bass and a better mid-range. They also have a thicker, more durable and detachable audio cable. On the other hand, the Etymotic isolate passively a lot better than the Shures. They also have a more lightweight and straightforward in-ear design that some may prefer over the thicker cables of the SE215.
The Westone W40 are slightly better-wired in-ears than the Shure 215. The Westone have a mic and in-line controls, which makes them a bit more versatile than the SE215s. The Westone also come with a better case and a lot more accessories than the Shures. On the upside, the Shures have a better bass, mid-range and a slightly better treble. They also have a slightly better noise isolation performance but it's heavily dependent on the tip and fit in your ears. Both headphones should have about the same performance for isolation and leakage.
The Shure SE425 have a slightly worse performance overall than the much cheaper Shure SE215. The SE425 have a slightly more premium-looking design, come with more accessories and a better case. However, the SE215 have better-balanced sound and block a bit more noise although the level of isolation depends strongly on the tips you use for the SE425 and the correct positioning in your ears. Both headphones are comfortable and well built critical listening in-ears with no in-line remotes but the better sound quality of the 215s makes them the better option, especially since they are the lower end model of the Shure SE line-up
The Bose Soundtrue Ultra In-ear are a slightly better headphone overall than the Shure SE 215. The Bose have a comfortable earbud fit which some may prefer over the in-ear design of the Shures. They also have an in-line remote and a mic so you can more easily use them with your phone and they're more convenient when gaming. They also have a better-balanced sound that has a deeper more powerful bass range. On the other hand, the Shures are better built, with a replaceable cable. They also have a more isolating in-ear fit that blocks more noise than the bose so they will be a bit more suitable to use in loud environments.
The 1More Triple Driver are a better sounding critical listening in-ear than the Shure SE215. The 1Mores have a more balanced audio reproduction and a great in-line remote that makes them versatile enough to work with most mobile devices and gives them a microphone for making calls and for gaming when plugged into your Xbox or PS4 controller. They have a sturdy design although the Shure is a bit better thanks to the replaceable cable. The Shures also have a more comfortable and better isolating in-ear fit so they would be a slightly better choice to use in loud noisy conditions. If you have the budget than the SE215 could be a decent and more durable alternative to the 1Mores Triple but for most use cases, the 1More are a little better and a bit cheaper
The MEE Audio M6 Pro have a similar design and overall performance as the Shure SE215 but at much more budget and affordable price. The Mee audios also have a detachable cable but include an additional one in the box. They also come with multiple tip sizes although they do not have as many foam tips as the Shures. They have a similar ear hook design that makes stable enough for sports, but the M6 pro have an in-line remote that makes them a bit more suitable to use with your phone on a day to day basis than the Shures. On the upside, the SE215 isolate much better in loud, noisy environments. They also have a slightly better sound quality that does not sound as sharp as the Mee Audios. Overall, the M6 Pro feel like a budget copy of the Shures, so if you do not want to spend a lot, they could be a good choice.