The Shure SE215 are decent critical listening in-ears that perform better than the higher-end models in the same lineup. They have almost an identical design to the SE315 and SE425 but do not come with as many accessories. On the upside, they have a better-balanced sound, and they isolate a bit more in noisy conditions. They also have stable ear-hooks and a comfortable in-ear fit which makes them a decent option for commuting and sports. Unfortunately, the lack of in-line controls is a bit limiting.
The Shure SE215 are well designed wired in-ears, with a durable build quality and a comfortable fit. They do not come with as many tip options as the more premium SE425, but their angled design and decent foam tips make them more comfortable than typical in-ears. They're also worn like an ear-hook design, which makes them a stable option for the gym although they are wired, and the cable could get tangled in your clothes or yank the earbuds out of your ears if it gets hooked by something. Unfortunately, they do not come with an additional cable in the box, and they have no control scheme so they won't be the best option to use with your mobile phone while exercising.
The Shure SE215 look identical to the higher-end SE315 and SE425. They have the same angled earbuds to better fit the contours of your ears, and a pseudo-ear-hook design that makes them a stable choice for sports. The earbuds look and feel premium and the audio cable is thick, heavily rubberized and detachable. Like the SE425, they have a transparent variation that stands out a bit more than the all-black color scheme, but both schemes are fairly understated and will work for most listeners.
The Shure SE215 have a comfortable in-ear fit. They come with multiple tip sizes to help you find the right fit, and they have an angled design to better fit the contours of your ears. This makes them more comfortable than typical in-ears, although they do not come with as many tip sizes as the more premium SE315 and SE425. Also, if you're not a big fan of in-ears, they may still get a bit fatiguing after wearing them for a while.
These headphones do not have a control scheme and do not come with an extra cable with an inline remote.
These headphones, like most in-ear models, are very breathable and will not make you sweat more than usual even during more strenuous activities. They have an ear hook design, but the hooks are thin and do not have as many points of contact with your ear as some of the other similarly designed headphones we've tested, like the Anker Soundcore Spirit X.
These headphones, unlike the SE425, come with a decent soft case instead of a sturdy hard one. It's decently portable and protects the headphones from impacts and drops but will not shield them from water damage. It also adds a fair bit of bulk, but since it's a soft case you can more easily squeeze into tight spaces than with the hard case of the SE425.
The Shure SE215, like the rest of the SE lineup, have good build quality for an in-ear design. They have a thick, durable cable, and decently dense earbuds. The cable is also removable which is relatively rare for in-ears and makes the headphones a lot more durable since you can always buy a replacement if the cable gets damaged by regular wear and tear. You can even purchase an adapter cable to make them wireless. Unfortunately, no extra cables are provided in the box which is somewhat disappointing. You can also check out the Tin Audio T3, BGVP DM6 or KZ AS-10 if you want equally well-built in-ears, with a slightly more unique look.
The SE215 are stable, wired in-ear headphones. They have a pseudo-ear-hook design that's flexible and not as stiff as other ear-hook models like the Anker SoundBuds Curve. This makes them stable enough for sports and working out since they will rarely fall out of your ears unless you physically pull them out or the audio cable gets hooked on something.
The Shure SE215 are an average sounding pair of closed-back in-ear headphones. They have a very good, deep, and consistent bass, an even and well-balanced mid-range, and an average treble. However, they tend to sound muddy and cluttered in the upper bass/lower mid-range which will negatively affect vocals by making the sound too thick, and they lack a bit of detail and presence in the treble range. Overall, they would be a decent choice for most genres, especially bass heavy ones, but not ideal for vocal-centric music. Also, like most other in-ear headphones, they don't have a large and speaker-like soundstage.
The bass is very good. LFE (low-frequency extension) is at 10Hz, which is excellent. Low-bass, responsible for the thump and rumble common to bass-heavy tracks is within 1.3dB of our target, which is great. Mid-bass, responsible for the body of bass guitars and the punch of kick drums is also within 1dB of our neutral target. However, high-bass, responsible for warmth, is overemphasized by 5dB which makes the bass quite boomy and muddy sounding.
The mid-range of the SE 215 is good. The 4dB bump in low-mid is actually the continuation of the high-bass overemphasis. This tends to thicken the vocals and lead instruments and make the overall mix sound cluttered. However, mid-mid and high-mid are much better balanced, meaning the upper harmonics of vocals/leads will be reproduced properly.
The treble performance is mediocre. The overall response is a little uneven throughout the range. Low-treble is decently balanced, but the narrow peak around 5KHz could make certain sounds a bit too intense. The relatively wide dip around 7KHz negatively affects the presence and brightness of certain sounds, especially S and Ts. Conversely, the peak around 10KHz could make some S and Ts a bit sharp and piercing. For headphones that sound clearer and sharper in the treble range, check out the similar Sennheiser IE 40 Pro.
The frequency response consistency is excellent. If the user is able to achieve a proper fit and an air-tight seal using the assortment of tips that come with the headphones, then they should be able to get consistent bass and treble delivery every time they use the headphones.
The imaging performance of the SE 215 is excellent. The weighted group delay is at 0.08, which is very low. The GD graph also shows that the entire group delay response is below the audibility threshold. This ensures a tight bass and a transparent treble reproduction. Additionally, the L/R drivers of our test unit were very well-matched, which is important for the accurate placement and localization of objects (instruments, voice, footsteps), in the stereo image.
The soundstage is poor. This is because creating an out-of-head and speaker-like soundstage is largely dependent on activating the resonances of the pinna (outer ear). The design of in-ears and earbuds is in such a way that fully bypasses the pinna and doesn't interact with it. Also, because these headphones have a closed-back enclosure, their soundstage won't be perceived to be as open as that of open-back earbuds like the Apple AirPods, Google Pixel Buds, or the Bose SoundSport Free.
The Shure SE 215 have a very good harmonic distortion performance. In the bass range, they show very little THD, even under heavy loads. This suggests that the Shure could take a few dB of EQ boost in the bass range before distorting. The peak in THD around 1KHz, however, is rather elevated and could make the region sound a bit harsh and fatiguing.
The Shure SE215 isolate better passively than some of the active noise cancelling headphones we've tested. They will be suitable to use in loud, noisy environments and while commuting and traveling, especially if you have a little music playing. They also barely leak, which makes them great headphones to use in quiet settings like an office or when you don't want to distract those around you.
The isolation performance of the Shure SE215 is great. Although these in-ears don't have an active noise cancelling (ANC) system, they provide an impressive amount of isolation. In the bass range, where the rumble of airplane and bus engines sits, they achieve 15dB of isolation, which is good. In the mid-range, important for blocking out speech, they isolate by more than 23dB, which is excellent. In the treble range, occupied by sharp sounds like S and Ts, they reduce outside noise by more than 36dB, which is very good. However, like most other passively isolating headphones, they aren't very effective around 200Hz.
The leakage performance is excellent. Like most other closed-back in-ears, these headphones don't leak in the bass and mid-ranges. The significant portion of their leakage is in the treble range and between 4KHz and 6KHz, which is a very narrow range. The overall level of the leakage is very quiet too. With the music at 100dB SPL, the leakage at 1 foot away averages at 22dB SPL and peaks at around 34dB SPL, which is lower than the noise floor of most offices.
These headphones do not have a microphone so the recording quality has not been tested.
The SE215 do not have a microphone so the noise handling has not been tested.
These headphones have no active features and therefore do not require a battery. They also do not have a dedicated app or software support for added customization options.
These are passive headphones with no active components and no battery.
The SE215 do not have a compatible app or software support for added customization options.
The Shure SE215 are not Bluetooth headphones and do not come with a base or dock. They have a wired 1/8TRS connection with no in-line remote so they will only provide audio when connected to your devices or consoles. Unfortunately, since they're wired, they won't have the range and convenience of wireless headphones for gaming or watching movies, but on the upside, they have practically no latency like most wired headphones.
These headphones are wired and do not have a Bluetooth connection. If you want a good Bluetooth headset for more casual use, check out the Sony WH-1000XM2.
The Shure SE215 have a simple 1/8" TRS audio cable with no in-line remote or mic so they will only provide audio when connected to your phone, PC or console controllers.
These headphones do not have a dock. If you need a headphone with a dock that also has a wired connection for gaming or watching movies, then consider the SteelSeries Arctis 7.
These are passive headphones that do not have a wireless range since they're wired. If you want a good wireless headphone for critical listening, consider the Plantronics BackBeat Pro 2.
The Shure SE215 have a simple wired connection with practically no latency. Unfortunately, this also means that they're limited by the range of the provided cables.
The Shure SE215 are decent critical listening in-ears, versatile enough for most use cases thanks to their simple wired design. They have a more comfortable fit than typical in-ear headphones, and if you get the right combination of tip size and proper placement, they will passively isolate better than some of the best noise canceling headphones we've tested. They have a durable build quality with a detachable cable you can replace if it gets damaged. Their sound quality is also a bit better than the higher-end models in the same lineup, but they are not the best sounding in-ears within their price range, especially when compared to some of the cheaper options below. See our recommendations for the best earbuds, the best headphones under $100, and the best budget earbuds and in-ears.
The Shure SE215 and Sennheiser IE 40 PRO are pretty similar in-ear headphones, but each are slightly better in different categories. The Shure are better-built as their detachable cable isn’t as loose as the IE 40 PRO’s, and the buds feel a bit better-made. Also, they fit better inside the ears, making them more comfortable and creating a better seal for excellent isolation. On the other hand, the IE 40 PRO have a better treble range reproduction as the SE215 have a broad dip that affects the detail and brightness of those frequencies. However, the IE 40 PRO have a significant lack of low-bass.
The KZ ZS-10 are a better sounding critical listening in-ear than the Shure SE215. The ZS-10 have a slightly more premium-looking design and a better-balanced sound. The SE215, on the other hand, have a slightly more comfortable fit and better noise isolation than the KZ. However, while both headphones are well-built in-ears with no in-line remotes, the better sound quality of the KZ makes them the better option, especially since they are a lot cheaper than the SE215.
The Shure SE215 are better critical listening in-ears than the MEE Audio M6 PRO. They are noticeably better-built and also feel more comfortable for long listening sessions. Additionally, their isolation performance is great and will allow you to concentrate on your audio content. Sound wise, they’ll be boomier than the M6, but won’t be as sharp. On the other hand, the M6 PRO have an in-line remote and an in-line microphone, which the SE215 are lacking. However, our M6 unit seemed to have a mismatch in phase.
The KZ AS-10 are better sounding headphones than the Shure SE215. They also look better and have a better build quality, thanks to the braided and replaceable cable. You can also find a variant of the AS-10 in an in-line remote and mic, which the SE215 lacks. However, the SE215 are more comfortable and offer slightly better noise isolation. The better sound quality and cheaper price make the AS-10 a better choice over the SE215.
The Sennheiser Momentum In-Ear are slightly better and more versatile headphones than the Shure SE215. The Shures have a better sound quality overall, and they're more comfortable thanks to the angled earbuds. They also have a much more durable build quality than the Momentum. However, the Momentum have an in-line remote, which provides control for iOS devices and has a microphone for taking calls, making them more versatile for everyday casual use. They also come with a better case than the Shures and have a slightly more compact design.
If sound quality is your only or most important factor, the TIN Audio T2 are better headphones, but otherwise, the Shure SE215 are more comfortable, come with a nice case, are more stable, and isolate a lot more noise than the TIN Audio. They also have a detachable cable like the T2, and you can find third-party cables with an in-line remote and mic too. However, they are more expensive than the TIN Audios.
The Westone W40 are slightly better-wired in-ears than the Shure SE215. The Westone have a mic and in-line controls, which makes them a bit more versatile than the SE215s. The Westone also come with a better case and a lot more accessories than the Shures. On the upside, the Shures have a better bass, mid-range, and a slightly better treble. They also have a slightly better noise isolation performance but it's heavily dependent on the tip and fit in your ears. Both headphones should have about the same performance for isolation and leakage.
The Shure SE215 are slightly better critical listening than the Etymotic HF5. They have a more comfortable fit with angled earbuds that better fit the contour of your ears. The Shures also have a better-balanced sound quality with a stronger bass and a better mid-range. They also have a thicker, more durable, and detachable audio cable. On the other hand, the Etymotic isolate passively a lot better than the Shures. They also have a more lightweight and straightforward in-ear design that some may prefer over the thicker cables of the SE215.