Whether you're a professional video editor or working on your first vlog, your monitor is an important piece of equipment. While you can use almost any display to edit your videos, getting something that makes your content look lifelike and realistic is beneficial. Different factors go into this, like the range of colors it displays and its accuracy before and after calibration. Besides that, having a high contrast ratio helps provide deep blacks in dark rooms.
You also have to think about the content that you're editing, like whether you need good HDR. High-end monitors, like OLEDs, have the best picture quality with deep blacks, and Mini LED displays with good local dimming are also great choices as they get bright. However, the best options also tend to cost a lot, so you may need to spend a lot for the best performance, considering there are trade-offs in picture quality with lower-end models. It's also important to consider the monitor's resolution, as a higher resolution helps deliver more detail and sharper images. You may want to think about the size you want, but that's more of a personal preference.
We've bought and tested more than 395 monitors, and below are our picks for the best monitors for video editing that are available to buy. See our recommendations for the best monitors for photo editing, the best 4k monitors, and the best monitors for graphic design.
We buy and test more than 30 monitors each year, all of which we purchase ourselves, without cherry-picked units or samples. We put a lot into each unbiased, straight-to-the-point review, and there's a whole process from purchasing to publishing, involving multiple teams and people. We do more than just use the monitor for a week; we use specialized, custom tools to measure various aspects and deliver objective, data-driven results. We also consider multiple factors before making any recommendations, including the monitor's cost, its performance compared to the competition, and whether it's easy to find.
-
Best Monitor For Video Editing
EditingColor AccuracyHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeLCDSub-TypeIPSMax Refresh Rate120 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution5120 x 2880The best monitor for video editing is the Apple Studio Display XDR. It's a high-end monitor ideal for even professional content creators, and it offers a high 5k resolution that results in detailed videos. What sets it apart from the competition is its Mini LED backlighting with a strong local dimming feature that helps it display deep blacks alongside bright highlights, but there's some haloing around bright objects against dark backgrounds. It's a fantastic choice for editing content in HDR, as it displays a wide range of colors and makes them look vivid. It also gets extremely bright, so it fights glare well in bright spaces.
You can also get it in different variants, including the screen coating you want. Although its standard glossy coating results in clear images, you can choose the Nano-texture matte coating for improved reflection handling at the cost of hazier images. It also has productivity features, including Thunderbolt 5 support and 140W of power delivery, which is ideal if you work with a power-hungry laptop, like a MacBook. You may also want to consider the Apple Studio Display 2026 if you want a much cheaper alternative with Thunderbolt 5, but it lacks any local dimming and has lower power delivery.
-
Best Upper Mid-Range Monitor For Video Editing
EditingColor AccuracyHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeLCDSub-TypeIPSMax Refresh Rate330 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution5120 x 2880If the Apple Studio Display XDR is too expensive for your needs, consider cheaper alternatives, such as the LG 27GM950B-B. It has a 27-inch 5k screen with detailed images like the Apple monitor, but there are a few notable trade-offs for the cheaper option. For example, the Apple gets much brighter, and it displays a wider range of colors in HDR. The Apple is also available with glossy and matte coatings, whereas the LG is only available with a matte coating, which produces hazier images. The advantage of this is that it has better reflection handling than the glossy coating of the Apple monitor.
On the plus side, it also uses Mini LED backlighting with an effective local dimming feature that helps it display deep blacks against bright highlights. While its black levels aren't as deep as on the Apple monitor, it has less haloing around bright objects. It has features different from the Apple monitor's, too. Instead of Thunderbolt 5 support, it supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, which is slower and offers lower power delivery. You can still connect a laptop to the screen, though. You may also want to look into the BenQ MA270S if you want another 5k option with Thunderbolt support, but it's worse for HDR than the LG.
-
Best Mid-Range Monitor For Video Editing
EditingColor AccuracyHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeQD-OLEDMax Refresh Rate240 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution2560 x 1440If you're on a tighter budget, you can consider lower-resolution options, like the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q. The biggest difference between this monitor and the LG 27GM950B-B is that it has a lower 1440p resolution, so images aren't as detailed and text isn't as sharp. It also has fewer productivity features, as it lacks any USB ports to connect your devices, and you'll need to connect your laptop over HDMI or DisplayPort. It isn't as bright as the LG, either, so it doesn't fight glare well in bright editing rooms.
Despite the trade-offs in resolution and features, this monitor actually has some advantages in picture quality over the LG. It has an OLED panel with deeper blacks and no haloing, which makes it the better choice if you want something for editing dark content in a dark room. It also displays a wide range of colors and is more accurate out of the box, but its colors aren't as vivid as on the LG. Lastly, it has a glossy coating that results in clearer images than on the LG, but it has more mirror-like reflections instead.
-
Best Lower Mid-Range Monitor For Video Editing
EditingColor AccuracyHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeLCDSub-TypeIPSMax Refresh Rate320 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution3840 x 2160If an OLED monitor is too expensive for you, the Acer Nitro XV275K P5biipruzx offers solid value, especially when it's on sale. The biggest downside of getting this over an OLED like the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q is that it doesn't display the same deep blacks. Instead, it uses Mini LED backlighting with a local dimming feature, which helps improve black levels in HDR. However, it has more haloing around bright objects in dark scenes, and you can't use this local dimming in SDR. This means the SDR picture quality is worse, with blacks that look gray.
That said, the Acer actually has a few advantages over the HyperX. For example, it has a higher 4k resolution for sharper images. It also gets much brighter, so it's the better choice if you need something for editing videos in bright rooms. Plus, the Acer has a few extra productivity features, including a KVM switch and a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alt Mode and 90W of power delivery. This helps if you want to connect your video editing laptop over USB-C.
-
Best Budget Monitor For Video Editing
EditingColor AccuracyHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeLCDSub-TypeVAMax Refresh Rate180 HzSee all our test resultsNative Resolution2560 x 1440If you're looking for a monitor for video editing and are on a tight budget, look into the AOC Q27G40XMN. It's a versatile entry-level monitor with Mini LED backlighting, similar to the Acer Nitro XV275K P5biipruzx. This means it displays deep blacks next to bright highlights, which is ideal for video editing in dark rooms, and small highlights really pop. You can also use this local dimming feature in SDR, giving it an advantage over the Acer. However, its local dimming has a bug with certain settings, so you need to avoid some settings to get good picture quality.
Unfortunately, it has a lower 1440p resolution than the Acer, meaning images are less detailed. It also has fewer features, lacks a USB hub, and has a worse viewing angle, so the image looks washed out from the sides. Besides that, it gets bright enough to fight glare even in bright rooms. It also displays a wide range of colors in HDR and has an accurate sRGB mode. If you can't find this monitor available in your region, you can also check out the similar AOC Q27G3XMN. However, it has fewer dimming zones and isn't as bright.
Notable Mentions
-
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM:
The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM is a high-end OLED with deeper blacks than the Apple Studio Display XDR. The ASUS also costs less, but it doesn't have Thunderbolt support, and it has a lower resolution for less detailed images.
See our review -
ASUS ROG Strix 5K XG27JCG:
The ASUS ROG Strix 5K XG27JCG is a 5k monitor that competes with the LG 27GM950B-B and often costs less. It delivers detailed images and has accurate colors. However, it doesn't have Mini LED backlighting, so it doesn't deliver the same deep blacks and bright highlights as the LG.
See our review -
Dell S3225QC:
The Dell S3225QC is an OLED that's in the same price range as the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q. The Dell has a higher 4k resolution for more detailed images, and it has a small USB hub. However, it has worse accuracy than the HyperX.
See our review -
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV:
The ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV is a 4k monitor with picture modes for various color spaces, including DCI-P3 and Rec. 2020. It has better accuracy than the Acer Nitro XV275K P5biipruzx. However, the ASUS is worse for HDR because its local dimming feature is terrible.
See our review -
Dell S2725QS:
The Dell S2725QS is an entry-level 4k monitor with excellent color accuracy thanks to its sRGB mode. It's something to consider over the AOC Q27G40XMN if you want a more detailed image, but it has worse HDR picture quality.
See our review
Recent Updates
Jun 29, 2026:
We made several changes to reflect the current monitor market. We replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM and the Dell Alienware AW2725DF with the Apple Studio Display XDR and the LG 27GM950B-B, which are brighter and have higher resolutions. We added the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q as the 'Best Mid-Range Monitor For Video Editing,' and we renamed the Acer Nitro XV275K P5biipruzx to the 'Best Lower Mid-Range Monitor For Video Editing.' In the Notable Mentions, we added the ASUS PG27UCDM and the ASUS ROG Strix 5K XG27JCG.
May 06, 2026:
In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG with the Apple Studio Display XDR.
Mar 18, 2026:
We removed the MSI G274QPF-QD and the Dell U4025QW from their respective categories because they're hard to find. We also replaced the Apple Studio Display 2022 and the ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS with the Dell S3225QC in the Notable Mentions.
Feb 03, 2026:
We replaced the BenQ MOBIUZ EX321UX with the Dell Alienware AW2725DF because the BenQ is hard to find. We also added the Acer Nitro XV275K P5biipruzx as the 'Best Mid-Range Monitor For Video Editing.' In the Notable Mentions, we removed the LG 40WP95C-W, and we added the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG and the ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS.
Oct 24, 2025:
We replaced the Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx, which is hard to find, with the BenQ MOBIUZ EX321UX and renamed it as the 'Best Upper Mid-Range Monitor For Video Editing.' We also added the Dell S2725QS to the Notable Mentions.
All Reviews
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best monitors for video editing currently available, including the best 4k monitors for video editing. They're adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. Our rating is based on our review, factoring in price and visitor feedback.
If you'd prefer to make your own decision, here's the list of all of our monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.