Whether you're a professional video editor or working on your first vlog, your monitor is an important piece of equipment. While you can use almost any display to edit your videos, getting something that makes your content look lifelike and realistic is beneficial. Various factors go into this, such as the range of colors it displays across different color spaces and its accuracy before and after calibration. Besides that, having a high contrast ratio helps provide deep blacks in dark rooms. Even having a wide viewing angle is beneficial, as the image remains consistent when viewing from the sides.
You also have to think about the content you're editing, such as whether you need good HDR performance. High-end monitors, like OLEDs, have the best picture quality with deep blacks, and Mini LED displays with good local dimming are also great choices, as they get bright. However, the best options also tend to cost a lot, so you may need to spend a lot for the best performance, as there are trade-offs in picture quality with lower-end models. It's also important to consider the monitor's resolution, as a higher resolution helps deliver more detail and sharper images. You may want to think about the size you want, but that's more of a personal preference.
We've bought and tested more than 415 monitors, and below are our picks for the best monitors for video editing currently available for purchase. See our recommendations for the best monitors for photo editing, the best monitors for graphic design, and the best 4k monitors if you want a specific resolution.
We buy and test more than 30 monitors each year, all of which we purchase ourselves, without cherry-picked units or samples. We put a lot into each unbiased, straight-to-the-point review, and there's a whole process from purchasing to publishing, involving multiple teams and people. We do more than just use the monitor for a week; we use specialized, custom tools to measure various aspects and deliver objective, data-driven results. We also consider multiple factors before making any recommendations, including the monitor's cost, its performance compared to the competition, and whether it's easy to find.
-
Best Monitor For Video Editing
EditingColor AccuracyHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize32"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeQD-OLEDMax Refresh Rate240 HzNative Resolution3840 x 2160sRGB Coverage xy%Adobe RGB Coverage xy%DCI-P3 Coverage xy%See all our test resultsRec. 2020 Coverage xy%The best monitor for video editing that we've tested so far is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3. It's a 4k OLED that delivers superb picture quality. What makes it exceptional for video editing is that its QD-OLED panel displays a wide range of vivid colors. This is ideal if you edit a variety of content, whether it's a promo video for a brand or a travel vlog. It's accurate without any sort of calibration in its dedicated sRGB mode, which helps if you work in that color space and don't want to spend extra on a full calibration. Besides that, it displays deep and inky blacks in dark rooms, and while blacks look gray in bright rooms, it at least fights some glare well in bright spaces.
It includes some features to help with your workflow, like a USB hub to connect your devices. It has a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alt Mode and 90W of power delivery, which means you can connect your laptop to display an image and charge it with the same cable. You can also view more of your editing timeline at once thanks to its 32-inch screen, and its 4k resolution displays detailed images. Keep in mind that OLEDs like this risk burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time, like if you always have your editing program open. You may want to check out the Apple Studio Display XDR if you want a high-end option without the risk of burn-in, but it costs a lot more than the ASUS and doesn't display the same deep blacks.
-
Best Upper Mid-Range Monitor For Video Editing
EditingColor AccuracyHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeLCDSub-TypeIPSMax Refresh Rate330 HzNative Resolution5120 x 2880sRGB Coverage xy%Adobe RGB Coverage xy%DCI-P3 Coverage xy%See all our test resultsRec. 2020 Coverage xy%If the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3 is too expensive for you and you still want a great option, the LG 27GM950B-B is a solid alternative. It's different from the ASUS because it doesn't have an OLED panel to display the same perfect blacks without any haloing around bright objects. Instead, it uses Mini LED backlighting that helps improve its black levels in dark content, at the cost of having some haloing around bright objects against dark backgrounds. It at least gets much brighter than the ASUS and maintains low black levels in bright rooms, so it's the better choice if you work in a well-lit space. Like the ASUS, it also displays a wide range of colors that are vivid and accurate out of the box, which helps no matter the content you're editing.
The LG has some advantages over the ASUS, like the fact that it doesn't risk burn-in. This means you can always have your editing program open and not worry about damaging the screen long term. This monitor also has a higher 5k resolution, and combined with its smaller screen and higher resolution, it delivers very sharp images. Lastly, it also has a small USB hub with DisplayPort Alt Mode to connect a laptop and 90W of power delivery, so it keeps your laptop charged as you're editing.
-
Best Mid-Range Monitor For Video Editing
EditingColor AccuracyHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeOLEDSub-TypeQD-OLEDMax Refresh Rate360 HzNative Resolution2560 x 1440sRGB Coverage xy%Adobe RGB Coverage xy%DCI-P3 Coverage xy%See all our test resultsRec. 2020 Coverage xy%If you're on a tighter budget, you can consider lower-resolution options, like the Dell Alienware AW2725DF. The biggest difference between this monitor and the LG 27GM950B-B is its lower 1440p resolution, so images aren't as detailed and text isn't as sharp. It also has fewer productivity features, as it lacks DisplayPort Alt Mode over USB-C, so you'll need to connect your laptop via HDMI or DisplayPort. It isn't as bright as the LG, either, so it doesn't fight glare well in bright editing rooms.
Despite the trade-offs in resolution and features, this monitor actually has some advantages in picture quality over the LG. Like the higher-end ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3, it has a QD-OLED panel with deeper blacks and no haloing, which makes it the better choice if you want something for editing dark content in a dark room. It also displays a wide range of colors and is more accurate out of the box, with colors nearly as vivid as on the LG. Lastly, it has a glossy coating that results in clearer images than the LG, but it also has more mirror-like reflections, so it's best to avoid placing it in front of a sunny window.
-
Best Lower Mid-Range Monitor For Video Editing
EditingColor AccuracyHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeLCDSub-TypeIPSMax Refresh Rate320 HzNative Resolution3840 x 2160sRGB Coverage xy%Adobe RGB Coverage xy%DCI-P3 Coverage xy%See all our test resultsRec. 2020 Coverage xy%If an OLED monitor is too expensive for you, the Acer Nitro XV275K P5biipruzx offers solid value, especially when it's on sale. The biggest downside of getting this over an OLED like the Dell Alienware AW2725DF is that it doesn't display the same deep blacks. Instead, it uses Mini LED backlighting with an okay local dimming feature, which helps improve black levels in HDR. However, it has more haloing around bright objects in dark scenes, and you can't use this local dimming in SDR. This means the SDR picture quality is worse, with blacks that look gray, as it has a low contrast ratio.
That said, the Acer actually has a few advantages over the Dell. For example, it has a higher 4k resolution for sharper images. It also gets much brighter, so it's the better choice if you need something for editing videos in bright rooms. Plus, the Acer has a few extra productivity features, including a KVM switch to use the same devices on different sources, and a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alt Mode and 90W of power delivery. This helps if you want to connect your video-editing laptop via USB-C.
-
Best Budget Monitor For Video Editing
EditingColor AccuracyHDR PictureSDR PictureBrightnessSize27"Panel TypeLCDSub-TypeIPSMax Refresh Rate200 HzNative Resolution2560 x 1440sRGB Coverage xy%Adobe RGB Coverage xy%DCI-P3 Coverage xy%See all our test resultsRec. 2020 Coverage xy%If you're looking for a monitor for video editing and are on a tight budget, look into the KOORUI S2721PM. It's a versatile entry-level monitor with Mini LED backlighting, similar to the Acer Nitro XV275K P5biipruzx. This means it displays deep blacks, which is ideal for video editing in dark rooms, and highlights really pop. You can also use this local dimming feature in SDR, giving it an advantage over the Acer if you don't edit content in HDR. Plus, its local dimming performs better than the Acer monitor's, with less haloing around bright objects against dark backgrounds.
Unfortunately, it has a lower 1440p resolution than the Acer, resulting in less detailed images. It also has fewer features, as it lacks a USB hub, so you can't connect any devices directly to the monitor. Besides that, it gets bright enough to fight glare even in bright rooms. It also displays a wide range of colors in HDR and has an accurate sRGB mode in SDR, so you'll only need to calibrate it if you need perfectly accurate colors in the sRGB color space.
Notable Mentions
-
Dell Alienware AW3926QW:
The Dell Alienware AW3926QW is a high-end OLED with an ultrawide 39-inch screen. It's something to consider over the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3 if you want the extra screen space for working with long video timelines. However, it isn't as bright as the ASUS, and it has less vivid colors.
See our review -
BenQ MA270S:
The BenQ MA270S is a 5k content creation monitor that has more productivity features than the LG 27GM950B-B, like Thunderbolt 4 support. It has accurate colors too, but it doesn't get as bright or deliver the same deep blacks as the LG because it lacks Mini LED backlighting.
See our review -
Dell S3225QC:
The Dell S3225QC is an OLED that's in the same price range as the Dell Alienware AW2725DF. The S3225QC offers a higher 4k resolution for more detailed images and supports DisplayPort Alt Mode over USB-C. However, the S3225QC can be harder to find.
See our review -
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV:
The ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV is a 4k monitor with picture modes for various color spaces, including DCI-P3 and Rec. 2020. It has better accuracy than the Acer Nitro XV275K P5biipruzx. However, the ASUS is worse for HDR because its local dimming feature is terrible.
See our review -
AOC Q27G3XMN:
The AOC Q27G3XMN is a budget-friendly 1440p monitor. With Mini LED backlighting, it's an alternative to the KOORUI S2721PM if you want a higher native contrast ratio for deeper blacks without local dimming. However, the AOC has a worse viewing angle, so the image looks washed out from the sides.
See our review
Recent Updates
Oct 23, 2026:
We replaced the Apple Studio Display XDR with the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3 as the 'Best Monitor For Video Editing' because the ASUS displays deeper blacks and costs less. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM, the ASUS ROG Strix 5K XG27JCG, and the AOC Q27G40XMN with the Dell Alienware AW3926QW, the BenQ MA270S, and the AOC Q27G3XMN to better reflect the current market.
Aug 25, 2026:
We replaced the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q with the Dell Alienware AW2725DF, which has better colors. We also replaced the AOC Q27G40XMN with the KOORUI S2721PM as it has a wider viewing angle. In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the Dell S2725QS with the Q27G40XMN.
Jun 29, 2026:
We made several changes to reflect the current monitor market. We replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM and the Dell Alienware AW2725DF with the Apple Studio Display XDR and the LG 27GM950B-B, which are brighter and have higher resolutions. We added the HyperX OMEN OLED 27q as the 'Best Mid-Range Monitor For Video Editing,' and we renamed the Acer Nitro XV275K P5biipruzx to the 'Best Lower Mid-Range Monitor For Video Editing.' In the Notable Mentions, we added the ASUS PG27UCDM and the ASUS ROG Strix 5K XG27JCG.
May 06, 2026:
In the Notable Mentions, we replaced the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG with the Apple Studio Display XDR.
Mar 18, 2026:
We removed the MSI G274QPF-QD and the Dell U4025QW from their respective categories because they're hard to find. We also replaced the Apple Studio Display 2022 and the ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS with the Dell S3225QC in the Notable Mentions.
All Reviews
Our recommendations are based on what we consider the best monitors for video editing currently available in the United States. The rating is based on our review, visitor feedback, and price. For example, two monitors may perform the same, but the cheaper one will be recommended. We also consider availability, as we don't recommend a monitor that's hard to find.
If you'd prefer to make your own decision, here's the list of all of our monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.