The Beats Studio 3 are above-average for a lot of use cases. They have the same stylish and polished design of the previous Studio Wireless but with an improved noise cancellation performance. Their audio reproduction and ANC automatically adapts to the listener and the environment which is a great feature when done right but can sometimes be a bit inconsistent.
The Beats Studio 3 are above-average mixed usage headphones. They look great and have a simple-to-use design that offers a good control scheme and a comfortable fit. The noise canceling is a lot better than on the original Studio wireless, although it can be a bit inconsistent at times. This is also true for their adaptive sound quality that's decent but not as balanced as the Solo 3.
Above-average for neutral listening. They have an audio reproduction that adapts to each listener. However, through our measurement averages, the Studio 3 tend to have a bit more high bass and low mids than the original Studio Wireless. This gives them less thump and rumble and a slightly muddier sound quality. They're still sufficiently well balanced to satisfy most listeners, however, the somewhat inconsistent audio reproduction and poor soundstage due to their closed design mean they won't be ideal for more neutral listeners.See our Neutral Sound recommendations
Above-average for commuting. The noise cancellation is strong enough to use on public transit and they're sufficiently comfortable and easy to use. The Beats Studio 3 also fold to be a bit more portable but they won't be as easy to carry on your person as the Solo3 or BeatsXSee our Commute/Travel recommendations
Above-average for sports. They're comfortable and stable enough to exercise with. They're also wireless with a great range so you can leave your phone on a bench while you run or have a fixed Bluetooth source like PC if you're at the gym. However, they will get your ears a bit warm and sweaty after a good 30 minutes of working out. If you need a more sports-oriented headset and like the beats'design then check out the Powerbeats 3 Wireless.See our Sports/Fitness recommendations
Good for office use. They're comfortable, have a decent noise isolation performance and really low leakage. This means they will rarely be distracting to those around you and block enough chatter for moderately noisy office.See our Office recommendations
Below-average for gaming. They're comfortable, have a great range, and easy to use controls but the latency will be a deal breaker for most. They also have no customizable options and a mediocre at best microphone.See our Wireless Gaming recommendations
The Studio 3, like most of the Beats lineup, have a slick look that doesn't feel cluttered. The buttons are discrete and seamlessly blend with the design of the ear cups. They also don't feel bulky despite being a full-sized over-ear headphone. They're an eye-catching pair of headphones that also come in a variety of color schemes to better match your tastes and preferences.
The Beats Studio 3 are comfortable and lightweight over-ear headphones. The ear cups are very well-padded and large enough to fit comfortably around most ears. This makes their slightly tight fit a bit better as the pressure is evenly distributed around your ears. The headband is not as well-cushioned as the ear cups and feels slightly rigid but shouldn't be much of an issue. You can easily wear these headphones for hours at a time and not feel any fatigue.
The Studio 3 have a slightly improved control scheme compared to the previous model. You can now switch off the noise cancellation by double tapping the Power button. The rest of the control scheme, however, is pretty much the same. They have an identical button layout that's simple and efficient to use. They provide call/music, track skipping, and volume controls. The buttons deliver good tactile feedback although they're completely flat on the ear cup which might be a bit difficult to distinguish at first.
The Beats Studio 3 Wireless will make your ears fairly warm during exercise. They are closed back over-ears with a decent seal, so they trap a lot of heat which will make you sweat after 30 to 40 minutes of vigorous exercise. They should be okay if you're just using them casually to listen to music. They won't be the ideal headphones for more intense work-out routines, although if you want over-ear headphones for the gym, they're a decent option.
These headphones have a mid-sized, over-ear design that's somewhat portable. They fold into a more compact format that's easier to transport with the provided hard case. They will fit into purses and smaller bags or can be hooked on your person provided they're in the case. However, they're still a bit too cumbersome.
These headphones come with a sturdy and compact hard case that will protect the headphones against scratches, mild water damage and falls.
The Beats Studio 3, like the previous model, are well-built sturdy-looking headphones. The plastic used for the ear cups feels dense and won't get damaged from a few falls. The headband has a metal frame that's tough yet flexible. They're a bit thinner and less robust than the Beats Executive and the plastic coating on the headband is prone to scratches and scuffs, but their overall build quality feels high-end and well made.
The Beats Studio 3 have a comfortable and tight fit that makes them stable enough for working out and exercising. They don't move much when running and since they're wireless, they won't accidentally fall off your head because the audio cable got hooked on something. However, they're still somewhat big over-ear headphones so they will slide a bit depending on the intensity of your work out routine. Lying down, for example, may cause the headband to tilt a bit.
The Beats Studio 3 have a mediocre frequency response consistency. Despite their noise canceling and self-calibrating systems, the Studio 3 perform less consistent than other noise canceling headphones such as the MDR-1000X, WH-1000XM2, and the QuietComfort 35. They show about 6dB of deviation both in the bass and treble ranges and are somewhat prone to a drop in bass if the user is wearing glasses.
The bass performance of the Beats Studio 3 is very good. Sub-bass (low-frequency extension) is extended down to 19Hz, which is good. This indicates that these headphones can produce a good amount of thump and punch. Mid-bass is over our target by about 2.7dB, adding a bit of excess punch to bass and kicks. The 3dB bump in high-bass makes the sound of these headphones slightly boomy. Also, their bass delivery varies noticeably across users, and is sensitive to the quality of fit, seal, and whether you wear glasses. The response here represents the average bass response and your experience may vary.
The Beats Studio 3 Wireless have a good mid-range. Mid-mid and high-mid of virtually flat and within 1dB of our target. However, the 5dB bump in low-mid makes the mid-range cluttered and muddy. Overall, the mid-range is quite well-balanced in the mid and upper regions, but because of the low-mid bump, vocals and lead instruments tend to sound a bit thick on them.
The treble of the Beats Studio3 Wireless is quite good. The overall response is well-balanced but slightly inconsistent. Also the dip around 5KHz will have a small but noticeable negative effect on detail and presence of vocals and lead instruments. Overall, the treble sounds good but slightly veiled.
The stereo imaging is about average. Their weighted group delay is at 0.53, which is below average. In the graph, most of the spikes in group delay, which are caused by the auto-calibrating system, are mostly below 20Hz, which shouldn't affect the sound significantly. However, some of the spikes happen in the audible range which could make the bass of the Studio 3 a bit loose, at least when auto-calibration is happening. We also measured some phase mismatch between the L/R drivers, which could have a small negative effect on the coherency of their stereo image.
The soundstage is sub-par. Based on our PRTF test results, the Beats Studio 3 Wireless don't seem to be activating the resonances of the pinna (outer ear) significantly, which results in a small and inside-the-head soundstage. Also, since they are closed-back, their soundstage will be perceived as less open, compared to open-back headphones.
The Beats Studio 3 Wireless have average isolation that isn't as good as competing models like the Sony WH-1000XM3 Bose QuietComfort 35 II or the Microsoft Surface Headphones. The active noise cancellation of the Studio3 achieves a mediocre 8dB of isolation in the bass range, which is important for canceling out airplane and bus engine rumbles. However, they achieve 22dB and 36dB of isolation in the mid and treble ranges respectively, both values being quite good. This indicates performance good isolation for speech and sharp sounds such as S and Ts. However, they also produce a relatively high amount of self-noise which could be distracting when no audio is being played through the headphones.
The leakage performance of the Beats Studio 3 is very good. The significant portion of leakage sits between 2KHz and 5KHz which is quite a narrow range. The overall level of leakage is also low, making these headphones suitable for most situations unless the music is turned up very loud in a quiet environment, like an elevator.
The performance of the Beats Studio3's integrated microphone is mediocre. Speech recorded will sound a little bit thin and noticeably muffled. They will also have difficulty separating speech from noise in moderately loud environments such as a busy street.
The Beats Studio 3's mic has a mediocre recording quality. With the LFE at 281Hz and HFE at 3.5KHz speech recorded with this headphone will sound slightly thin and lacking in presence and detail. However, the area between LFE and HFE is relatively flat.
The microphone is sub-par at noise handling. The microphone on the Beats Studio 3 Wireless achieves a SpNR of only 10dB, which is sub-par. This makes them unsuitable for use in moderately loud environments.
The battery performance of the Beats Studio 3 is much better than that of the studio wireless. They have almost twice the battery life at 23 hours of continuous playback on a single charge. They also only take about 30 mins more than the previous model to fully charge. That plus their quick charge feature which gives you about 2.5 hours of playback from a 10 mins charge means you will likely have enough battery to last you all day even if you're a heavy user, and in the worst case scenario, you can always charge them quickly before leaving your house or work. Unfortunately, they do not have any passive playback so if the battery is completely dead you won't be able to use the headphones, which makes sense since their audio reproduction is adaptive.
Like the Beats Solo3 Wireless and the AirPpods, the Studio 3 have a few features available on iOS that aren't as well implemented on Android. They connect with a pop-up that displays basic battery information and you can also disable the noise cancellation if you go to the Bluetooth settings of the headphones. This setting isn't available on Android so Android users may feel a bit limited but you can always manually switch of noise canceling by pressing the power button twice.
The Beats Studio 3 connect wirelessly via Bluetooth but cannot pair simultaneously with multiple devices. They also do not have NFC support. On the upside, they are much easier to pair than the Original Studio Wireless.
The latency is a bit worse than the Studio Wireless. Both headphones have enough latency that videos are a bit out of sync but this will be a bit more noticeable on the Studio 3s. They perform a bit better on iOS devices but won't be the ideal headphones for gaming or home theater. On the upside, they should be fine for most music and streaming applications.
These headphones come with an iOS-specific cable with an in-line remote microphone that's compatible with the PS4 but not the Xbox One. This gives them a secondary connection option, which is better for watching videos due to the almost negligible latency when using an audio cable.
They do not have a base/dock. If you want a versatile headset with a base that you can also use wired check out the SteelSeries Arctis 7.
The Studio 3 Wireless are the updated version of the Studio Wireless design. They have better isolation thanks to their adaptive noise canceling, they have an above-average sound quality and a comfortable over-ear fit. However, their dynamic audio reproduction tends to sound a bit inconsistent at times and they do not isolate better than some of the other headphones they are often compared to. See our recommendations for the best wireless headphones and the best closed-back headphones.
The Beats Studio3 Wireless are slightly better headset than the Beats Solo3 Wireless thanks to noise cancellation. The Studio3s isolate a bit better in noisy conditions, which makes them a better option for commute and travel than the Solo3. They also have a more comfortable over-ear design that most will prefer over the on-ear fit of the Solo3s. The Solo3 Wireless, on the other hand, are a bit more compact and have a much better battery life than the Studio variant. They also have a greater wireless range and better latency performance.
The Beats Studio3 Wireless are somewhat better headphones than the Beats Studio Wireless. They have the same stylish and polished design, but the Studio3 Wireless have a better control scheme and improved noise cancellation. They sound quite similar, but the Studio3 Wireless sound slightly better overall. The Studio3 Wireless also have a much better battery than the Studio Wireless and feature the W1 chip for improved ease-of-use with Apple devices. The Studio Wireless have better latency and microphone noise handling performance, though. They’re both decent headphones for most uses, but the more intuitive pairing process and control scheme of the Beats Studio3 Wireless gives them an edge.
The Sony WH-1000XM3 Wireless are better headphones than the Beats Studio 3 Wireless. They feel slightly more premium and sound a bit more neutral, but with a small excess in thump and rumble. Additionally, you can customize their sound to your liking easily inside the Sony app, which Beats is lacking. The ANC of the XM3 is also noticeably better and will block out more ambient noise. On the other hand, the only place where the Beats is a better choice over the Sony is that their audio cable has an in-line mic and the Sonys don’t. They also have physical buttons, which can be easier to use for some, especially since the touch-sensitive surface of the XM3s is practically unresponsive in freezing conditions.
The Sony WH-H900N have similar performance to the Beats Studio3 Wireless. The Sonys have better-balanced default sound quality and more customization options, thanks to their companion app. They also have a sleeker-looking build quality that feels a bit more high end than the Studio3s. The Beats, on the other hand, have a slightly stronger noise isolation performance and lower leakage. They also charge a lot faster and have a greater wireless range than the Sonys. They're more stable for the gym, and a lot more comfortable for most users, with easier-to-use controls and a cool-looking design that most will prefer over that of the Sonys.
The Bose QuietComfort 35 are a better headset overall than the Beats Studio3 Wireless. The Bose have a more comfortable over-ear fit and stronger noise cancellation that will isolate better in noisy environments. On the upside, the Beats have a better wireless range and a faster charging battery life than the Bose. The Beats are also a bit more stable for sports and some will prefer their sleek and stylized over-ear design over the Bose's somewhat bland but more professional look.
The Sony WH-1000XM2 are a better wireless over-ear than the Beats Studio3 Wireless. The Sony have a better noise cancellation performance, which makes them a bit more suitable for commute and travel than the Studio3s. They also have a lot more features and customization options that you can tweak thanks to the Sony Headphones app. They have a slightly more polished design that looks and feels more high-end than that of the Beats. The Studio3 Wireless, on the other hand, have a more stylish looking build quality that some will prefer over that of the Sonys. They also have a faster charge time a longer wireless range and slightly better latency performance, especially on iOS devices. The Beats are also a bit more lightweight, comfortable, and stable for the gym compared to the Sonys.
The Beats Studio 3 Wireless are slightly better headphones than the Sennheiser HD 4.50 BTNC. The Beats are noticeably more comfortable, slightly better-built, and have a more premium feel than the HD 4.50. They also have a better frequency response, but our unit had a significant phase mismatch and performed differently on various users. The ANC feature of the Beats Studio 3 is quite good, but the self-noise is pretty high and can be heard when no audio is being played through the headphones. On the other hand, the HD 4.50 can connect to two devices simultaneously and have a good app with a great parametric EQ that lets you customize their sound to your liking. They can also be used passively, which you can’t do with the Studio 3.
The Bose QuietComfort 35 II are better headphones than the Beats Studio 3 Wireless. They are one of the most comfortable headphones we’ve reviewed so far, and their sound profile is great. Their ANC feature is also one of the best on the market and blocks noticeably more ambient noise than the Studio 3. On the other hand, the Beats Studio 3 will be slightly better-suited for bass-heavy genres and they leak less than the QC35 II. They also have an in-line microphone for calls, which the QC35 II are lacking. The battery life of the Studio 3 gets you about 3 hours more than the QC 35, but they don’t have a power-saving feature.
The Sennheiser PXC 550 are marginally better than the Beats Studio 3 Wireless, if the most important thing for you is a an accurate and neutral sound. The Studio 3 are slightly more comfortable and a noticeably better ANC feature, but when it comes to sound, the PXC 550 are more accurate. You can also customize the sound of the PXC 550 to your liking with their dedicated app, which the Beats don't have. They can also connect simultaneously to two devices and can be used wired when the battery is dead, which the Beats can't do.
The Plantronics BackBeat Pro 2 are a better wireless over-ear than the Beats Studio3 Wireless. The Beats have a slightly better-balanced default sound than the Plantronics. They're also more comfortable, portable, and have a sleeker design that's stable enough for the gym and sports. The Plantronics, on the other hand, have a better wireless range and battery life than the Beats. They also have easier to use controls with more functionality, and they sound a bit more exciting thanks to their deep and powerful bass range.
The Bowers & Wilkins PX have a fairly similar performance to the Beats Studio3 Wireless. The PX isolate a lot better in noisy environments than the Beats, so they will be a bit more suitable for traveling and commuting. They also have a better more premium looking build quality that most will prefer over the Beats. The Beats, on the other hand, have a more consistent sound than the PX despite their adaptive audio reproduction. They also have a sleeker over-ear fit that's more comfortable and a bit more suitable for physical activities than the PX. The Beats also have a longer battery life and charge a lot faster, making them slightly more practical for everyday casual use.
The Beats Studio3 Wireless are better headphones than the Skullcandy Venue. They have a more neutral sound profile, especially in the mid-range, while still sounding exciting. They are better-built and are more comfortable. Their ANC feature blocks more noise than the Venue’s and the provided case is better. On the other hand, the Venue can connect to 2 devices, and their bass isn’t as prone to inconsistencies as the Studio 3s.
The Beats Studio 3 Wireless will be a better mixed usage pair of headphones than the Nuraphone. The Beats Studio 3 are more comfortable and have better bass noise isolation, which is better suited for public transit. They also come with an audio cable and an in-line microphone, which the Nuraphone is lacking inside the box. On the other hand, the personalization feature of the Nuraphone is a unique experience that you can’t get on the Beats headphones and they also offer more battery life than the Studio 3.
The Microsoft Surface Headphones are better headphones for bass fans, while the Beats Studio3 Wireless have a more neutral sound quality with a not-so-veiled treble range. The Microsofts have a better and more complete control scheme that is satisfying to use. The feedback is better on the physical buttons of the Beats, but you get limited controls. Also, the Surface Headphones have better noise isolation performance but have about half of the Studio3’s battery life.