The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II is a good gaming headset with a balanced sound and a casual design that ensures they aren't limited to indoor use. Once you remove the mic, they can easily pass as regular headphones, although their color scheme is quite unique. They're well-built, sturdy, and comfortable. Their wired design and low latency make them suitable for gaming and watching movies. However, their lack of noise cancellation makes them less than ideal for commuting or traveling.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are decent for neutral listening. The gaming headset has good bass and a balanced mid-range but a poor treble reproduction. They lack a bit of detail while sounding slightly sharp on some tracks due to the inconsistent treble range. They also don't have the most spacious soundstage since they're closed-back headphones. On the upside, they're comfortable and sound good enough for casual listening.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are inadequate for commuting. Although they have a more outdoor-friendly design than other gaming headsets, thanks to their detachable mic, good build quality, and comfortable design, they don't block enough noise to be ideal for public transit.
Although the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are a bit more compact than other gaming headsets, they're still a bit too bulky and unstable to be suitable for running or working out. They will also make your ears a bit warm after a couple of minutes of exercising.
The headphones are mediocre for office leak. They don't leak much but don't block a lot of noise, so you'll still be able to hear the ambient chatter if you're not playing any music.
These headphones aren't suitable for wireless gaming.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II headset is good for gaming. They have low latency, a wired USB connection, a fairly well-balanced audio reproduction, and a great noise filtering mic. They're comfortable enough to wear for long gaming sessions but, unfortunately, have no software support for added customization options, unlike some of the other popular gaming headsets. Their design is also not the most breathable, so your ears may get a little warm after gaming for a while.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II is a wired gaming headset with durable build quality and a well-balanced sound. These headphones are also more outdoor-friendly since you can remove the mic and use them as casual everyday headphones, unlike some of the competing gaming headsets at around the same price such as the Astro A10 Gen 2. They're very comfortable with spacious ear cups. However, their wired design won't be as convenient as some of the other wireless gaming headsets that we've tested so far. See our recommendations for the best gaming headsets, the best gaming headsets under $100, and the best gaming headsets under $50.
The HyperX Cloud Alpha are slightly better than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. The Cloud II and the Cloud Alpha have a very similar design with a detachable boom mic so you can use them casually for day-to-day use, though the mic on the Cloud II performs slightly better overall. They also come with a slightly more versatile USB DAC with additional microphone control, but it doesn't add much since they don't come with good support software. While both pairs of headphones look and feel very similar, the detachable audio cable on the Cloud Alpha makes them feel slightly more durable, as it can easily be replaced. They also have a slightly better-balanced sound profile.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II and the HyperX Cloud Alpha S are very similarly performing gaming headphones but the Cloud Alpha S are slightly better. The Cloud Alpha S have a bit better controls such as a bass slider on each ear cup. They also feel slightly better built and have companion software that allows you to adjust the mic level. The Cloud 2, on the other hand, have a slightly better performing boom microphone. On the downside, it should be noted that both headphones have inconsistent bass and treble delivery, and neither have a full EQ to account for it.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better headphones than the Razer BlackShark V2, though depending on your preferences, you may prefer one over the other. The HyperX are more comfortable, better-built, and their microphone performs better out-of-the-box. They also do a better job passively isolating noise. That being said, the Razer have a better-balanced sound profile, and they're compatible with customization software that lets you adjust the sound and the microphone performance to your liking. The Razer also have a more stable fit.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are lightly better gaming headphones than the Logitech G Pro X Gaming Headset. The HyperX have channel mixing and their boom microphone performs slightly better, but they don't offer as many customization options as what you can find in the Logitech G HUB app. Conversely, the Logitech come with a mobile-friendly cable that lets you control your music, which makes them even more versatile.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud Core since they have controls. These two headsets are practically the same, but the Cloud II has an in-line remote that gives you access to a mic-mute, volume control, and channel mixing, while the Core model is simple and will be good for people who don’t care much for controls.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II and the SteelSeries Arctis 3 2019 Edition Wireless are similarly performing gaming headphones but unlike the HyperX, the SteelSeries can be used wired or wirelessly via Bluetooth. Although they both have similarly excellent boom microphones, the HyperX are slightly more comfortable and have a better build quality. The SteelSeries, on the other hand, have a more balanced sound profile and a continuous battery life of over 40 hours.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better gaming headphones than the Razer BlackShark V2 X. The HyperX are more comfortable, better-built, and have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer. They also come with a wired USB connection, and their boom mic offers a better noise handling performance. However, the Razer's mic has a better recording quality.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II is a slightly better and more complete gaming headset than the HyperX Cloud Stinger. The Cloud II is better-built and is one of the most comfortable gaming headsets we’ve reviewed so far. It also has channel mixing and quick access to their surround sound setting. On the other hand, the Cloud Stinger might have a slightly better sound quality, especially in the treble range, but that’s about it.
The SteelSeries Arctis 5 2019 Edition are slightly better-wired gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. They have a very nice gaming software that allows lots of customization and control over the headset. Also, their sound quality is better than the HyperX’s, especially in the treble range. On the other hand, the HyperX are better-built and are one of the most comfortable gaming headphones we’ve reviewed so far. Their microphone recording quality is also superior, which you can also fully detach to use the headphones outdoors.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better wired gaming headphones than the Razer Kraken V3. The HyperX are significantly more comfortable as well as better-built. Their boom mic also offers better overall performance. If you're looking for customizability, the Razer have a companion app that offers a graphic EQ and presets to help you tweak their sound, as well as RGB lighting that you can tweak to suit your mood.
If you’re looking for a headset that you can customize and have many controls, then the Logitech G433 Gaming Headset will be a better option. If you prefer straightforward headsets and prefer to care about comfort and build quality, then the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II is a better choice. These gaming headphones are both good for their intended use but will be better at different things. Also, the HyperX have channel mixing, which the G433 is lacking. On the other hand, the sound quality of the G433 is more accurate, and you can EQ it inside their app, which you can’t do on the Cloud II.
The SteelSeries Arctis 7 2019 Edition Wireless can be used both wired and wirelessly, so they’re more versatile gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II which can only be used wired. The SteelSeries are also customizable with their support software on PC, but the HyperX are more comfortable.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are the wired variant of the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II Wireless. They share a similar style, build quality, and comfort level. The wireless variant offers over 30 hours of continuous playback time as well as low audio latency via their non-Bluetooth wireless dongle. They're also compatible with PC, PS4, PS5, and Nintendo Switch devices. However, the wired variant comes with a carrying pouch, its mic has a better recording quality, and you can use it on the Xbox One in addition to most other consoles with an AUX port.
The Logitech G PRO X WIRELESS LIGHTSPEED Gaming Headset are better gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. While both headphones are equally comfortable and have similarly great boom microphone performances, the Logitech have a wireless design, and have a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer. Their companion software also offers a graphic EQ and presets so that you can adjust their sound to your liking, and they have low non-Bluetooth wireless latency. However, the HyperX are a suitable choice if you like to game while using a wired connection.
The HyperX Cloud2/Cloud II and the Razer BlackShark V2 Pro Wireless are gaming headsets with different strengths. The HyperX Cloud2/Cloud II are wired-only headphones with a more comfortable fit. Their mic has a much better recording quality and does a significantly better job of isolating your voice from background noise. On the other hand, the Razer are wireless headphones that you can also use wired with the included 1/8" TRRS cable. Their companion software is better, too, since it gives you access to a graphic EQ and presets.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II and the HyperX Cloud Stinger S are very similar headphones, and depending on your preferences, you may prefer one over the other. The Cloud 2 are more comfortable and better-built. They also leak less noise. That said, the Stinger S are compatible with companion software, unlike the Cloud 2, which lets you adjust the microphone levels.
The Logitech G432 Gaming Headset are more customizable gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. The Logitech have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and they're compatible with G HUB software, which allows you to adjust their sound to your preferences using the graphic EQ and presets. However, the HyperX are more comfortable and better-built. They also have a better overall mic performance.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better overall gaming headphones than the Logitech G Pro Gaming Headset. They're more comfortable, feel much better-built, and come with a USB sound card to activate channel mixing and surround sound options on PC and PS4. The Logitech's microphone performs better in quiet environments, but they reproduce audio very inconsistently across different users.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better wired gaming headphones than the Razer Kraken X. The HyperX sound much better-balanced, they're more comfortable, and their USB DAC provides additional features like channel mixing and virtual surround sound. The Razer's microphone sounds even more natural, though. They also come with a Y-splitter, which is helpful when connecting to certain desktop PCs, especially since it helps eliminate the latency a USB DAC can cause.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II and the HyperX Cloud Flight are both decent gaming headphones, but their main difference is that the Cloud II are wired while the Cloud Flight are wireless. The Cloud II feel a bit better-built, thanks to their metal frame, and are a bit more comfortable during long gaming marathons. On the other hand, the Cloud Flight have a better-balanced sound profile, and dedicated customization software, though it doesn't offer many options.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II and the SteelSeries Arctis Nova 3 have different strengths, meaning you may prefer one over the other. The HyperX headphones are plug-and-play with a more comfortable fit, built-in surround sound, and better overall build quality. Their microphone offers a better performance as a whole too. However, the SteelSeries headphones are more customizable as they're compatible with SteelSeries GG and Sonar software, which offers robust features like EQs and mic levels.
The SteelSeries Arctis Pro GameDAC are better gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. The SteelSeries are compatible with the SteelSeries Engine, so you can customize the sound using graphic EQ and presets. You can also tweak the EQ on-the-fly by using their DAC and the DAC itself offers a lot of connectivity options as well as customization features. However, the HyperX are more comfortable, well-built, and their microphone performs better than the SteelSeries.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better wired gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud Revolver + 7.1. The Cloud 2 are comfier, better-built, block out more ambient noise, and offer superior overall mic performance. However, the Cloud Revolver have a better passive soundstage performance.
The SteelSeries Arctis Pro Wireless are more versatile gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. The SteelSeries are more feature-packed, with a wireless transmitter that gives you access to an onboard EQ, channel mixing, and battery charging. They also support Bluetooth so you can mix in a voice chat from your phone into your game audio. However, the HyperX have a more traditional wired design, which some gamers prefer. They're also more comfortable, and their mic is detachable.
The Corsair HS70 Wireless are slightly better gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. The Corsair are wireless, have a better-balanced sound profile out-of-the-box, and companion software for customization options. On the other hand, the HyperX's wired connection means you don't need to worry about batteries or latency issues, and makes them compatible with any console. They also have a much better microphone, are more comfortable, and leak much less audio.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better gaming headphones than the Razer Kraken Tournament Edition. They are one of the most comfortable gaming headphones we’ve reviewed so far. They are also better-built and feel more solid thanks to the metal frame of the headband and hinges. They sound quality is also superior, although you can’t EQ them inside an app like you can do with the Razer headphones. The HyperX is also a bit more outdoor-friendly since you can detach the microphone. Their overall design isn’t as bulky as the Kraken.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are the better choice for wired gaming over the Corsair VOID RGB Elite. The HyperX are comfier, sturdier-feeling, have better noise isolation capabilities as well as a better boom mic. They also feature an analog to USB control box with onboard controls for live channel mixing and microphone volume adjustment. The Corsair, meanwhile, offer a slightly broader range of configuration options thanks to their Corsair iCUE companion app, which features audio presets, a graphic EQ, microphone sidetone adjustment, and RGB lighting customization.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better wired gaming headphones than the Logitech G335. The HyperX come with an analog to USB-A adapter with an in-line remote, which allows you to adjust mic level and volume on-the-fly or enable the Dolby 7.1 surround sound feature. They're also better-built, block out more ambient noise, leak less audio, and deliver superior mic recording quality and noise handling performance. Meanwhile, the Logitech have a more consistent audio delivery.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are slightly better for wired gaming compared to the Cooler Master MH751. The HyperX have a more comfortable fit, superior build quality, and better microphone noise handling capability. They also have a more comprehensive control scheme via an in-line remote on their analog-to-USB adapter. Meanwhile, the Cooler Master have a more expansive soundstage as well as a slightly more portable, compact design.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II and the HyperX Cloud Flight S are both decent gaming headphones but the Cloud 2 are wired-only, while the Flight S can only be used wirelessly. The Cloud 2 are more comfortable, and look and feel a bit more durable. They're also better for people with multiple consoles, as their wired connection means you can easily plug them into the controller of either a PS4 or Xbox One. On the other hand, the Flight S only work with PC/PS4 but have companion software, though it doesn't add much. They also support wireless charging, which may be handy to some people.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better overall wired gaming headphones than the Corsair HS50. While both models feel very well-made, the HyperX are much more comfortable for long gaming sessions. They also have more control options, like channel mixing and an option to activate surround sound on PC and PS4 thanks to their USB sound card/in-line remote. They also have a much better microphone and isolate more noise too. The Corsair reproduce sounds in the treble range more accurately, though, and their simpler controls are also easier-to-use.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II is a better gaming headset than the Razer Kraken Pro V2. The HyperX is one of the better-built and most comfortable gaming headsets we’ve reviewed so far. It offers great value for the price and has a better sound quality than the Kraken. It also offers channel mixing directly on the in-line remote and the microphone is detachable, so you can use the HyperX as normal headphones as well.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better gaming headphones than the Corsair HS60. The HyperX are more comfortable and slightly better-built. They also have a much better microphone, a better control scheme, and come with more accessories than the Corsair like a carrying pouch, an airline adapter, and extra pads. On the other hand, the Corsair sounds a lot better balanced than the HyperX. The Corsair also benefit from the iCUE software supports which gives them a bit more customization options than the HyperX.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II and HyperX Cloud Revolver have an almost identical performance for gaming, but the Cloud II are a bit more versatile overall. The Cloud II are slightly more comfortable with better-padded ear cups than the Cloud Revolver. The Cloud II also have a sturdier and more durable build quality that does not have as many moving parts, and they come with a USB dongle that gives them audio over USB on PC as well as a bit more controls. On the other hand, the Revolver have a better-balanced sound and unique design that some may prefer.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II and the Sennheiser Game One Gaming Headset are both good gaming headsets, but each performs better in different ways. The open-back Sennheiser have better audio reproduction and will be more open-sounding than the HyperX, but some may feel like they are a bit lacking in sub-bass. The mic of the Sennheiser also offers a better recording quality. On the other hand, the HyperX has channel mixing when used via USB and are comfortable and better-built. They are also more versatile, as their closed-back design blocks more ambient noise and you can fully detach their microphone for a more outdoor-friendly look.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II is an overall better gaming headset than the Corsair Void PRO RGB Wireless if you don’t need a wireless headset. They are more comfortable and are better-built than the Corsair. The HyperX also have a better microphone for online gaming. On the other hand, the Corsair have slightly better audio reproduction, especially with sharp noises in the treble range. Unfortunately, they can’t be used wired and have a relatively short battery life, which is something you won’t have to worry about with the wired HyperX. However, you’ll be able to customize their sound with the in-app EQ, which HyperX doesn’t have.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II is a better gaming headset than the HyperX Cloud Mix, but it won’t be as versatile. The Cloud II are slightly more comfortable and offer channel mixing, which is great. However, they can’t be used wirelessly like the Cloud Mix. Overall, these two headsets are very similar, but if you’re looking for a gaming-only one, get the Cloud II. If you want one pair of headphones for multiple use cases and gaming, get the Cloud Mix.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are slightly better wired gaming headphones than the Astro A10 Gen 2. The HyperX are more comfortable, better built, and have a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer. They also support Dolby 7.1, which can help create a more immersive audio experience, and their boom mic offers a significantly better overall performance. However, the Astro can create a better passive soundstage that feels wider. Sound also feels like it's coming from speakers placed in the room around you, rather than from inside your head, which is outstanding.
If you don’t care much for customization options and RGB lighting, then the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better gaming headphones than the Logitech G635 Gaming Headset, especially thanks to their great build quality and comfortable design. They also have a better microphone for online games and offer channel mixing on their in-line remote. However, the G635 has better sound quality, especially in the treble range, and is more customizable thanks to the G HUB app.
The Astro A40 TR Headset + MixAmp Pro 2017 are better gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II thanks to their good controls on the MixAmp and customization software on PC. Sound-wise, the Astro are a bit better, and you can EQ them easily in the app, which you can’t do on the HyperX. On the other hand, if your gaming environment is somewhat noisy, the closed-back design of the HyperX will be better than the open-backed Astro.
The Logitech G935 Wireless Gaming Headset are more versatile gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. Although the HyperX are more comfortable, have slightly better build quality, and their boom microphone outperforms the Logitech, the Logitech can be used both wired and wirelessly, which can give users more connectivity options. The Logitech also have dedicated companion software which is nice if you like to customize your audio experience.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are better gaming headphones than the Logitech G430 Gaming Headset. The HyperX are more comfortable and are noticeably better-built than the G430. Their metal frame is sturdier than the very plasticky Logitech headset. They also have a better microphone and support channel mixing, but the Logitech have access to great customization software, which the HyperX lacks. On the other hand, the HyperX are more versatile since you can unplug the microphone and use the headphones outside. The Logitech are more neutral sounding, especially in the treble range.
The SteelSeries Arctis 7 Wireless 2017 are a better gaming headset than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. You get the freedom of wireless technology on top of better audio reproduction, and a great customization software. However, you’ll have to manage battery life, which not everyone prefers. The HyperX is a wired headset, so you won’t have to worry about this. The HyperX also have a slightly better isolation performance and are one of the better-built and most comfortable gaming headsets we’ve reviewed so far.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are wired gaming headphones, while the Turtle Beach Stealth 600 Wireless are wireless. If you’re playing on console, the wireless Turtle Beach could be a better option since they provide better range. However, the HyperX are among some of the better-built and more comfortable gaming headphones we’ve reviewed. The HyperX also have a better sounding microphone, which is great for online multiplayer games, but the Turtle Beach sound a bit better-balanced.
The Astro A50 Gen 3 Wireless 2017 are better gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. The Astro's wireless design gives you more freedom, perform more consistently across different users, have more detail in the treble range, and have a nice app that allows customization options. However, they can’t be used without their base, which is quite restrictive. The HyperX also have minimal latency and you won’t have to manage a battery life thanks to their wired connection. The HyperX mic also has a better recording quality and is fully detachable, making them a bit more outside-friendly than the Astro.
The Turtle Beach Elite Atlas is a slightly better headset than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II if you care about sound quality the most. Both headsets are very comfortable, but the cups are deeper and larger on the Turtle Beach. However, the HyperX has channel mixing that gamers should appreciate to mix game and chat audio. The HyperX also slightly isolate more ambient noise and don’t get as hot as the Turtle Beach.
The Audeze Mobius are slightly better gaming headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. The HyperX have a much better build quality and are also more comfortable than the Audeze. They have a more outdoor-friendly design that's a bit more suitable for commuting and even physical activities. On the other hand, the Audeze are wireless via Bluetooth which make them a bit more convenient to use with your phone. They also offer a unique gaming experience thanks to their 3D sound and head tracking features. The Audeze have a slightly more bass-heavy default sound profile that you can somewhat customize with the built-in EQ modes.
The Beats Solo Pro Wireless are more versatile headphones than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. The Beats are wireless on-ear headphones with a more neutral default sound profile, which some users may prefer, and superior noise isolation performance, thanks to their active noise cancelling system. They also have an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with your Apple devices. However, the HyperX are over-ears designed for gaming. They're more comfortable and have a significantly better overall boom mic performance.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are a better gaming headset if you prefer a wired design that you can use with your console controllers. However, if you want a wireless option for gaming, then the Logitech G930 Wireless Gaming Headset are a better choice. The G930 have a lot more range thanks to their wireless connection. They also have a lot more customization options, thanks to their software support and programmable buttons. The HyperX Cloud II, on the other hand, have a much better build quality and comfort level. They're also wired with a detachable mic so they more easily pass for casual over-ears that you can use outdoors.
The Turtle Beach Elite Pro 2 SuperAmp headset is slightly better than the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II. It offers more customization due to the Turtle Beach Audio Hub software and are slightly better sounding than the HyperX. They also come with an AMP to amplify the sound, and it offers an easily accessible volume knob. You can also connect the headset to your phone over Bluetooth to listen to your music and take calls, which you can’t do on the HyperX. However, the HyperX has a slightly better microphone and are more comfortable for long gaming sessions. They also leak less than the Turtle Beach, which can be useful if there are people in the same room as you. The subtler look of the HyperX is also better for outdoor use.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II and the TOZO T6 Truly Wireless are very different headphones. The HyperX are wired headphones with a boom microphone designed for gaming, while the TOZO are truly wireless Bluetooth earbuds for use with your mobile devices. You can still use the HyperX with your phone since they use a regular audio jack, but the TOZO aren't compatible with most gaming platforms and have too much wireless latency for PC gaming.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II have a simple and polished design. The arching hinges are reminiscent of the Beyerdynamic headphones like the Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO. The mic is also detachable, making them more appealing for casual use. However, they're still a bit bulky, and the bright logos on the ear cups may not be for everyone. On the upside, the simple two-tone black and red color scheme looks good and stands out without being too flashy.
These are comfortable headphones with big, well-padded ear cups and an equally well-padded headband. They're more comfortable than the HyperX Cloud Flight or SteelSeries Arctis Nova 3, but they're a bit tight on the head. Fortunately, the pressure is spread evenly around your ears, so they don't clamp your head like some other gaming headphones we've reviewed. Unfortunately, this still makes them somewhat fatiguing after long gaming sessions.
They have a sub-par control scheme, especially for gaming. They have a dedicated in-line remote cable with a USB connection that gives you control over the volume and mic level, as well as a surround sound button to activate Dolby 7.1. They also have a mute switch on the side of the in-line remote to completely disable the mic. The buttons are decently responsive although a little flat. They also take a bit of time to get familiar with, but they're relatively easy-to-use. Unfortunately, the control scheme isn't as versatile since it doesn't cater to mobile devices, which is a little disappointing since the headphones can also pass for casual everyday headphones. For a more straightforward headset without controls, take a look at the HyperX Cloud Core.
Like the Logitech G Pro Gaming Headset, these headphones will make your ears fairly warm during long listening sessions and would not be suitable for more intense workouts. They have a closed-back over-ear design that fully encapsulates the ears and obstructs airflow. Unfortunately, they don't come with more breathable pads like the Logitech G433 Gaming Headset. They won't be ideal if you often have long uninterrupted gaming sessions, but they should be okay if you take a couple of breaks from time to time.
Like the Turtle Beach Elite Pro 2 SuperAmp, the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II aren't very portable headphones. They're a bit more compact than other gaming headphones but they're still on the larger side for most over-ears. That and the lack of foldable hinges makes them less portable and a bit of hassle to carry around on your person without a bag.
There's a simple pouch that comes in the box and will shield the headphones from minor scratches while they're in your bag. Unfortunately, it won't protect them against impacts, drops, or water damage.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II have a great build quality, similar to the HyperX Cloud Alpha. It feels durable yet flexible enough to not snap from overextension. The ear cups also feel dense, well made, and capable of handling a couple of drops without any major damage. However, the shiny backplates with the Hyper X logo could get scratched up over time, and the exposed audio cable linking the ear cups is a potential weak point. For headphones with a similar design but with better and sturdier materials, look at the Logitech G Pro X Gaming Headset.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II are just tight enough to be stable and comfortable headphones, but they won't be ideal for sports. They sway a lot under physical activity and will slip off your ears if you use them while running or working out. The main cable is also not detachable, so if it gets hooked on something it will yank the headphones off your head.
These headphones have a sub-par frequency response consistency. The treble response is decently consistent, with some minor peaks/dips around 4kHz, which shouldn't be terribly noticeably. The bass delivery is also quite consistent, as long as the user is getting a proper fit/seal with them. In our tests on five human subjects, the person who wore glasses experienced a noticeable drop in bass compared to others because the arm of their glasses broke the air-tight seal between the headphones and the head.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II bass is great. The LFE is extended down to 14Hz, which is great. Low-bass and mid-bass are quite flat and within 1.5dB of our target. This results in a bass that is capable of producing the thump and punch common to EDM, hip-hop, and film scores. However, high-bass is slightly more emphasized than mid-bass, making their sound very slightly boomy. Also, their bass delivery varies significantly across users and is sensitive to the quality of fit, seal, and whether you wear glasses. The response here represents the average bass response, and your experience may vary. If you prefer to have a little more control over your audio experience, the HyperX Cloud Alpha S has adjustable bass sliders to give you more or less bass.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II have a remarkable mid-range performance. Low-mid and mid-mid are virtually flat and within 1dB of our target, ensuring a clear mix with well-balanced vocals and lead instruments. The small dip around 1kHz, however, will push the vocals/leads slightly to the back of the mix.
The HyperX Cloud 2 have a sub-par treble response. The big dip will have a negative effect on the detail and articulation of vocals/leads. The peak around 9KHz could make these headphones noticeably sibilant (sharp and piercing on overly bright tracks). For a gaming headset with a better-balanced treble range, see the Razer BlackShark V2.
Update 01/10/2022: These headphones have been updated to test bench 1.5. In this update, we made changes to the way we test imaging. Our phase response mismatch test now represents the difference between the L/R drivers and includes an audibility threshold line. We have updated our review to reflect these results.
The imaging on these headphones is mediocre. The GD graph shows that the entire group delay response is below our audibility threshold, suggesting a tight bass and a transparent treble reproduction. Also, the L/R drivers of our unit are well-matched in terms of amplitude, which helps balance the stereo image. However, there's significant phase mismatch, and you can hear it in real-life content such as vocals and treble-range sounds like cymbals. This mismatch sounds as if the drivers are inverting, and it indicates that there are inaccuracies in the stereo image. There's also some frequency mismatch, which can create holes in the stereo image. However, our results are only valid for our unit, and yours may vary.
The soundstage on this headset is bad. Their PRTF response shows that they don't interact with the pinna (outer ear) much, and don't activate its resonances like a loudspeaker. Therefore, their soundstage will be perceived to be small and located inside the listener's head as opposed to in front. For another closed-back alternative that offer a slightly more spacious listening experience, consider the Corsair VOID RGB Elite.
The HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II isolation performance is sub-par, though they still do a better job of blocking out ambient noise than the HyperX Cloud Revolver + 7.1. Since they are over-ear and don't have ANC (active noise cancelling), the don't isolate in the bass range. This means they will let in all the rumble of airplane and bus engines. In the mid-range, which is important for blocking out speech, the achieved 13dB of isolation, which is above-average. In the treble range, occupied by sharp S and T sounds, they achieve more than 36dB of isolation, which is very good.
TheHyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II have a good leakage performance. The significant portion of their leakage is between 800Hz and 3KHz, which is a narrow range. The overall leakage level isn't very high, making the sound leaking out quiet and thin-sounding.
The boom mic has an excellent recording quality. The LFE (low-frequency extension) is very good. The HFE is also very good, resulting in a speech that above-average presence and detail, making it very clear and easy to understand. However, it does lack some openness and airiness because of the dip above 7kHz.
The boom microphone has impressive noise handling. In our SpNR test, it achieved a speech-to-noise ratio of 49dB, which is outstanding. It indicates that this mic will be to isolate speech from noise even in the noisiest and demanding environments.
These headphones are passive and have no battery life.
These headphones don't support non-Bluetooth wireless. However, the HyperX Cloud 2/Cloud II Wireless and have outstandingly low latency.
Update 12/02/2020: We've updated the USB Audio results from 'Analog to USB Adapter' to 'USB Type-A' to improve clarity. These headphones can receive audio when connected to a PC with a USB Type-A port. The scoring of this test hasn't changed.
The HyperX Cloud 2 have a wired connection that provides volume control and microphone compatibility support for consoles as long as you plug them into the Xbox One or PS4 controllers. They also come with a USB adapter for PCs that give them a bit more control over the microphone and audio.
Update 06/03/2020: We had previously reported that these headphones don't have a dock. However, after comparing their USB control box to those of other headphones, we decided to include it in the Base/Dock score. The review has been updated.
The HyperX Cloud II come with a USB control box that gives you access to functions you don't otherwise have when using the headset with their 1/8" TRRS connection. Unfortunately, it doesn't have any input options besides USB. However, it lets you mix your chat and audio channel levels independently, and activate a 7.1 virtual surround sound feature.