Get insider access
Preferred store
Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

LG 34GP83A-B Monitor Review

Tested using Methodology v2.0
Review updated Aug 15, 2024 at 01:05 pm
Latest change: Writing modified Nov 19, 2024 at 12:18 pm
LG 34GP83A-B Picture
7.1
PC Gaming
6.5
Console Gaming
7.3
Office
7.3
Editing
7.3
Brightness
7.7
Response Time
5.1
HDR Picture
6.7
SDR Picture
8.7
Color Accuracy

The LG 34GP83A-B is a 34-inch, 1440p ultrawide gaming monitor with a maximum refresh rate of 160Hz. As a part of LG's UltraGear lineup it sits alongside other ultrawide monitors, like the similar but cheaper 34-inch LG 34GP63A-B, and the higher-end 34-inch OLED LG 34GS95QE-B. It competes with other 34-inch ultrawide monitors, like the Dell S3422DWG and the Gigabyte M34WQ. It has several additional features, such as a crosshair overlay to assist with aiming, a black stabilizer mode to help make objects more visible in dark scenes, and a reader mode to help reduce eye strain.

Our Verdict

7.1 PC Gaming

The LG 34GP83A-B is decent for PC gaming. It has FreeSync and G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing, and its 160Hz max refresh rate is good enough for most gamers but not for competitive gaming. It has low input lag for a responsive feel and a fast response time, so fast-moving objects look crisp. However, its disappointing contrast causes deep blacks to appear gray in a dark room, and highlights don't pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Fast response time at all refresh rates.
  • Low input lag.
  • Supports FreeSync and is G-SYNC compatible.
Cons
  • Highlights don't pop.
  • Low contrast makes blacks look gray in dark rooms.
6.5 Console Gaming

The LG 34GP83A-B is okay for console gaming, but it has some limitations. It has a fairly fast response time at both 60Hz and 120Hz, so fast-moving objects look crisp. It also has low input lag for a responsive feel while gaming. However, it doesn't support VRR with the PS5. Additionally, with the Xbox Series X|S, you have to choose between having a 60Hz refresh rate with HDR and a downscaled image or a 120Hz refresh rate without HDR. It also has limited picture quality as blacks look gray in dark rooms, and highlights don't pop. Finally, the consoles don't support ultrawide gaming, so you'll see black bars on the sides.

Pros
  • Fast response time at all refresh rates.
  • Low input lag.
Cons
  • Can't take full advantage of consoles.
  • Highlights don't pop.
  • Low contrast makes blacks look gray in dark rooms.
7.3 Office

The LG 34GP83A-B is decent for office use. It has good text clarity, and its 34-inch screen allows you to open multiple windows at the same time. It also has very good brightness and adequate reflection handling, so it overcomes glare unless you're in a very bright environment. However, it doesn't swivel, so sharing your work with a colleague is more difficult.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight glare in most environments.
  • Good text and image clarity.
Cons
  • Doesn't swivel.
7.3 Editing

The LG 34GP83A-B is decent for content creation. It has good text clarity, and you can open multiple windows at the same time due to its large 34-inch screen. Additionally, it has great color accuracy before calibration, and it displays a wide range of HDR colors, which is great if you're editing photos or videos in a wider color gamut. However, its disappointing contrast causes deep blacks to appear gray in a dark room, and highlights don't pop in HDR, so it's not good for editing HDR content. Additionally, it can't swivel, so sharing your screen with colleagues is more difficult.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight glare in most environments.
  • Good text and image clarity.
  • Accurate before calibration.
Cons
  • Doesn't swivel.
7.3 Brightness

The LG 34GP83A-B has decent brightness. While it's bright enough to fight glare in most environments, it doesn't overcome the brightest glare. It also doesn't make highlights pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight glare in most environments.
Cons
  • Highlights don't pop.
7.7 Response Time

The LG 34GP83A-B has a good response time at all refresh rates.

Pros
  • Fast response time at all refresh rates.
Cons
5.1 HDR Picture

The LG 34GP83A-B is disappointing for HDR. It has a low contrast ratio, so blacks look gray in dark rooms, and it lacks a local dimming feature.

Pros
Cons
  • Low contrast makes blacks look gray in dark rooms.
  • Lack of local dimming feature.
6.7 SDR Picture

The LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B has okay picture quality in SDR. Its main strength is that it displays a wide range of colors, but blacks look gray in dark rooms due to its low contrast.

Pros
Cons
  • Low contrast makes blacks look gray in dark rooms.
8.7 Color Accuracy

The LG 34GP83A-B has great color accuracy. While it has an accurate sRGB mode, it only has decent gray uniformity and the edges of the screen look darker than the center.

Pros
  • Accurate before calibration.
  • Decent gray uniformity.
Cons
  • 7.1 PC Gaming
  • 6.5 Console Gaming
  • 7.3 Office
  • 7.3 Editing

Performance Usages

  • 7.3 Brightness
  • 7.7 Response Time
  • 5.1 HDR Picture
  • 6.7 SDR Picture
  • 8.7 Color Accuracy
  1. Updated Nov 19, 2024:

    Added that the MSI MPG 341CQPX QD-OLED displays bright HDR colors more vividly.

  2. Updated Aug 15, 2024: Updated text throughout the review according to Test Bench 2.0, mainly in the Verdict and Motion sections.
  3. Updated Aug 07, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.0. This includes new tests for VRR Motion Performance, Refresh Rate Compliance, Cumulative Absolute Deviation (CAD), and VRR Flicker. You can read the full changelog here.
  4. Updated Mar 21, 2024: Added that the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM has an even higher Refresh Rate.
  5. Updated Feb 07, 2023: Added text in the macOS Compatibility and Console Compatibility boxes and clarified text throughout as part of Test Bench 1.2.
  6. Updated Feb 06, 2023: Updated to Test Bench 1.2, resulting in changes to the results and scores with the Response Time and Input Lag. Added tests for Console Compatibility and macOS compatibility and made minor changes to other tests, which you can see in our Changelog.
  7. Updated Feb 12, 2021: Review published.
  8. Updated Feb 10, 2021: Early access published.
  9. Updated Jan 21, 2021: Our testers have started testing this product.
  10. Updated Jan 20, 2021: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.
  11. Updated Jan 15, 2021: We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We tested the 27-inch LG 34GP83A-B, which is the only size available for this monitor. The full model code may change between regions and retailers, and the results are only valid for this model.

Model Size Panel Type Resolution Refresh Rate
34GP83A-B 34" IPS 3440 x 1440 160Hz

Our unit was manufactured in November 2020; you can see the label here.

Compared To Other Monitors

The LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B is decent for PC gaming, as fast-moving objects look fairly crisp and its ultrawide screen provides an immersive experience. However, it's not the best choice if you care about HDR image quality. Its highlights don't get bright enough to pop, and deep blacks appear gray in a darker room. It competes with much cheaper ultrawide monitors that have slightly worse motion handling but get brighter in HDR and have better contrast, such as the Dell S3422DWG. If you're willing to spend a bit more you can also get an ultrawide OLED with vastly better motion handling and image quality, such as the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF, and it's a much better choice for gaming if you can afford it.

For more options, check out our recommendations for the best gaming monitors, the best ultrawide gaming monitors, and the best 34-49 inch monitors.

Dell S3422DWG

The LG 34GP83A-B and the Dell S3422DWG use different panel technologies, each with strengths and weaknesses. The LG's IPS panel delivers much better viewing angles, and it has a faster response time. The VA panel on the Dell delivers much better black uniformity and better contrast. The Dell also has better reflection handling and an optional backlight strobing feature.

Gigabyte M34WQ

The Gigabyte M34WQ is better than the LG 34GP83A-B. The Gigabyte has better ergonomics, much better reflection handling, and an optional backlight strobing feature. The Gigabyte is better for productivity as it has a few extra office features built-in, including a keyboard video and mouse switch (KVM), which allows you to switch between two sources with one set of input devices. On the other hand, the LG is better for some gamers as it has a faster response time.

LG 34GN850-B

The LG 34GP83A-B and the LG 34GN850-B are almost identical in design, features, and performance. The main differences are that the 34GN850-B has slightly better response time at max refresh rate, and it gets a bit brighter in HDR, although not by much.

LG 34GP950G-B

The LG 34GP83A-B and the LG 34GP950G-B are pretty similar overall. The 34GP950G has slightly better reflection handling, and the unit we bought has better gray uniformity, but this can vary between units. The 34GP950G has a local dimming feature, but it's pretty bad, so this doesn't add much over the 34GP83A-B. Finally, there's a slight difference in the supported gaming technologies. The 34GP950G is a native G-SYNC monitor, whereas the 34GP83A-B is just G-SYNC compatible, so if you have an NVIDIA graphics card and want to get the most out of it, the 34GP950G might be the better choice.

Acer Nitro XV340CK Pbmiipphzx

The LG 34GP83A-B and the Acer Nitro XV340CK Pbmiipphzx are both 34 inch ultrawide monitors with a 1440p resolution. The LG is better for gaming because it has faster response times and a higher refresh rate. The Acer scores higher because it has a Black Frame Insertion feature; however, it isn't usable while VRR is active. If you're in a well-lit room where glare is an issue, the Acer has better reflection handling, but the LG gets brighter. The Acer has significantly better ergonomics because it allows for a full 360-degree swivel.

Dell S2721DGF

Although the Dell S2721DGF and the LG 34GP83A-B have different screen sizes and aspect ratios, they're quite similar in gaming performance. Both monitors have exceptional response times, and the Dell's 165Hz refresh rate is only marginally higher than the LG's 160Hz. The Dell has better ergonomics and wider viewing angles, making it a better choice for sharing content or playing co-op games. On the other hand, the LG's 21:9 aspect ratio feels more immersive and provides more space for multitasking.

Dell Alienware AW3420DW

The LG 34GP83A-B is better than the Dell Alienware AW3420DW for most uses. It has a higher 160Hz refresh rate compared to the Dell's 120Hz, and its response time is significantly better. Also, its higher peak brightness makes it more ideal for well-lit rooms, and it supports HDR. The Dell has better ergonomics because it allows for swivel adjustment, and it has more USB ports. In terms of VRR support, the LG is compatible with FreeSync and G-SYNC, while the Dell has native G-SYNC support and FreeSync compatibility.

Dell Alienware AW3821DW

The LG 34GP83A-B and the Dell Alienware AW3821DW are very similar overall. The LG has slightly better gaming performance because it has a higher refresh rate and better response times. However, the Dell delivers a better HDR experience due to its wider color gamut and higher peak brightness. The biggest difference between them is that the LG is compatible with FreeSync and G-SYNC, while the Dell is a native G-SYNC monitor with FreeSync compatibility. The Dell has a bigger screen and a higher resolution, but it comes out to roughly the same pixel density as the LG.

+ Show more

Video

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
Design
Style
Curved
Yes
Curve Radius
1900R

This LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B has a gamer-oriented design with a black plastic body. Though the monitor has a simple aesthetic from the front, both the appearance of the tripod-based stand and the back of the monitor make it clear this is a gaming monitor.

7.0
Design
Build Quality

The build quality is satisfactory. Though it has a basic plastic build it's fairly sturdy. However, the cable management slot at the back feels a bit flimsy.

6.3
Design
Ergonomics
Min Height To Top Of Panel
17.9" (45.5 cm)
Height Adjustment
4.3" (11.0 cm)
Tilt Range
-15° to 5°
Rotate Portrait/Landscape
No
Swivel Range
No swivel
Wall Mount
VESA 100x100

The ergonomics are mediocre. It has great height adjustment so you can set it to your preferred position for a long gaming session. However, it can't swivel, so it's more difficult to share your screen with another person while co-op gaming or working. The stand features a clip for cable management.

Design
Stand
Base Width
17.9" (45.4 cm)
Base Depth
12.2" (31.1 cm)
Thickness (With Display)
10.6" (26.8 cm)
Weight (With Display)
16.8 lbs (7.6 kg)

The stand is wide and deep. It supports the monitor well, and there isn't much wobble.

Design
Display
Size
34"
Housing Width
32.2" (81.9 cm)
Housing Height
14.2" (36.1 cm)
Thickness (Without Stand)
4.2" (10.6 cm)
Weight (Without Stand)
11.9 lbs (5.4 kg)
Borders Size (Bezels)
0.4" (1.0 cm)
Design
Controls

There's a single joystick below the LG branding in the center of the bottom bezel. You can use it to control the power and navigate the on-screen menu.

Design
In The Box
Power Supply
External Brick

  • User guide
  • Owner's manual CD
  • Power cord
  • Power supply
  • DisplayPort cable

Picture Quality
5.9
Picture Quality
Contrast
Native Contrast
956 : 1
Contrast With Local Dimming
N/A

The monitor has disappointing contrast. As a result, deep blacks appear gray in darker rooms, and the monitor has no local dimming feature to improve the contrast further.

0
Picture Quality
Local Dimming
Local Dimming
No
Backlight
Edge

This monitor doesn't have a local dimming feature. We still film these videos on the monitor so you can compare the backlight performance with a monitor that has local dimming.

8.0
Picture Quality
SDR Brightness
Real Scene
342 cd/m²
Peak 2% Window
388 cd/m²
Peak 10% Window
389 cd/m²
Peak 25% Window
389 cd/m²
Peak 50% Window
390 cd/m²
Peak 100% Window
390 cd/m²
Sustained 2% Window
387 cd/m²
Sustained 10% Window
388 cd/m²
Sustained 25% Window
389 cd/m²
Sustained 50% Window
389 cd/m²
Sustained 100% Window
389 cd/m²
Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
0.000
Minimum Brightness
24 cd/m²

Settings

  • Game Mode: Gamer 1
  • Brightness: Maximum

The SDR brightness is very good. It gets bright enough to overcome glare and maintains its brightness consistently across different content.

6.8
Picture Quality
HDR Brightness
VESA DisplayHDR Certification
DisplayHDR 400 - 1.0/1.1
Real Scene
398 cd/m²
Peak 2% Window
433 cd/m²
Peak 10% Window
457 cd/m²
Peak 25% Window
457 cd/m²
Peak 50% Window
457 cd/m²
Peak 100% Window
457 cd/m²
Sustained 2% Window
432 cd/m²
Sustained 10% Window
456 cd/m²
Sustained 25% Window
456 cd/m²
Sustained 50% Window
456 cd/m²
Sustained 100% Window
456 cd/m²
Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
0.003

Settings

  • Game Mode: Gamer 2
  • Brightness: Maximum

The HDR brightness is adequate, but not enough for highlights to pop. It follows the PQ EOTF curve fairly well until there's a very sharp roll-off at peak brightness, letting highlights get the brightest they can.

7.1
Picture Quality
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Left
44°
Color Washout From Right
40°
Color Shift From Left
56°
Color Shift From Right
53°
Brightness Loss From Left
49°
Brightness Loss From Right
46°
Black Level Raise From Left
33°
Black Level Raise From Right
19°
Gamma Shift From Left
40°
Gamma Shift From Right
30°

The horizontal viewing angle is decent. While it looks washed out at wide angles, it's still fine if you want to share the screen with someone next to you for co-op gaming.

7.3
Picture Quality
Vertical Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Below
32°
Color Washout From Above
32°
Color Shift From Below
40°
Color Shift From Above
48°
Brightness Loss From Below
34°
Brightness Loss From Above
35°
Black Level Raise From Below
70°
Black Level Raise From Above
70°
Gamma Shift From Below
40°
Gamma Shift From Above
40°

The vertical viewing angle is satisfactory. The image appears slightly washed out if you stand up and look down at the monitor.

7.3
Picture Quality
Gray Uniformity
50% Std. Dev.
4.919%
50% DSE
0.158%

The gray uniformity is decent. While the edges of the screen are darker than the rest, there isn't too much dirty screen effect in the center, which is great.

6.1
Picture Quality
Black Uniformity
Native Std. Dev.
1.932%
Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
N/A

The black uniformity is mediocre. Backlight bleed is visible along the monitor's edges, and the screen is a bit cloudy. There's no local dimming feature to improve this performance further. The photo above doesn't show the entire screen due to the monitor's aspect ratio and the photo's crop. You can see the entire screen here.

8.8
Picture Quality
Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
Picture Mode
sRGB
sRGB Gamut Area xy
102.8%
White Balance dE (Avg.)
2.38
Color Temperature (Avg.)
6,402 K
Gamma (Avg.)
2.12
Color dE (Avg.)
1.92
Contrast Setting
70
RGB Settings
Default
Gamma Setting
Default
Brightness Setting
23
Measured Brightness
131 cd/m²
Brightness Locked
No

The accuracy before calibration is excellent. It clamps colors to the sRGB color space well, and though it slightly oversaturates most colors it has great color accuracy. Additionally, the color temperature is very close to the 6500K target, and the white balance is very good. However, the gamma is slightly off, as most parts of scenes are a bit too bright.

Locked-out Settings

  • Black Stabilizer
  • Response Time
  • Sharpness
  • Gamma
  • Color Temp
  • RGB
  • Six Color
  • Black Level
  • DFC
  • Variable Backlight

If you want to access these settings which are locked out in the 'sRGB' mode, then you need to use another mode with worse color accuracy, like Gamer 1.

9.8
Picture Quality
Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
Picture Mode
Gamer 1
sRGB Gamut Area xy
100.7%
White Balance dE (Avg.)
0.56
Color Temperature (Avg.)
6,492 K
Gamma (Avg.)
2.19
Color dE (Avg.)
0.36
Contrast Setting
68
RGB Settings
50-52-50
Gamma Setting
Mode 2
Brightness Setting
17
Measured Brightness
99 cd/m²
ICC Profile
Download

The accuracy after calibration is remarkable, and you won't notice any problems. Additionally, you can use any of the settings that are locked out in the sRGB mode.

9.6
Picture Quality
SDR Color Gamut
sRGB Coverage xy
99.9%
sRGB Picture Mode
Gamer 1
Adobe RGB Coverage xy
89.5%
Adobe RGB Picture Mode
Gamer 1

The SDR color gamut is remarkable. It displays all colors in the common sRGB color space and a wide range of colors in the Adobe RGB color space. That said, green is quite inaccurate in Adobe RGB.

8.8
Picture Quality
HDR Color Gamut
Wide Color Gamut
Yes
DCI-P3 Coverage xy
95.2%
DCI-P3 Picture Mode
Gamer 2
Rec. 2020 Coverage xy
70.7%
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
Gamer 2

The HDR color gamut is excellent. It has fantastic coverage of the DCI-P3 color space used in most HDR content. It also has great coverage of the wider Rec. 2020 color space, though colors are less accurate than with DCI-P3.

7.7
Picture Quality
HDR Color Volume
1,000 cd/m² DCI-P3 Coverage ICtCp
65.3%
DCI-P3 Picture Mode
Gamer 2
10,000 cd/m² Rec. 2020 Coverage ICtCp
32.6%
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
Gamer 2

The HDR color volume is good. Its wide color gamut helps it display a large range of colors, but it struggles to properly display bright and dark colors well. If you're looking for a monitor that displays bright colors more vividly, check out the MSI MPG 341CQPX QD-OLED.

7.5
Picture Quality
Text Clarity
Pixel Type
IPS
Subpixel Layout
RGB

The text clarity is good, and the text looks bolder with Windows ClearType (top photo) enabled.

6.5
Picture Quality
Reflections
Screen Finish
Matte
Total Reflections
7.2%
Indirect Reflections
3.9%
Calculated Direct Reflections
3.3%

The reflection handling is okay. While strong light causes distracting glare, it also gets bright enough to fight glare in most well-lit office spaces.

9.9
Picture Quality
Gradient
Color Depth
10 Bit

The gradient handling is outstanding, and you won't notice any issues with banding in scenes with shades of similar colors.

Motion
7.5
Motion
Refresh Rate
Native Refresh Rate
144 Hz
Max Refresh Rate
160 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over DP
160 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
85 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over DP @ 10-bit
144 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI @ 10-Bit
50 Hz

Due to bandwidth limitations, the max refresh rate is limited over HDMI, but you won't have any issues reaching that max refresh rate over DisplayPort. If you're looking for a monitor with an even higher refresh rate, consider the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM, which has a 240Hz refresh rate.

Motion
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
Variable Refresh Rate
Yes
FreeSync
Yes
G-SYNC
Compatible (NVIDIA Certified)
VRR Maximum
160 Hz
VRR Minimum
< 20 Hz
VRR Supported Connectors
DisplayPort, HDMI

NVIDIAVRR MinVRR Max
DisplayPort<20Hz160Hz
HDMIN/AN/A

AMDVRR MinVRR Max
DisplayPort<20Hz160Hz
HDMI50Hz85Hz

While this monitor supports FreeSync over HDMI, it doesn't always work properly, and Low Framerate Compensation (LFC) doesn't work over HDMI.

7.8
Motion
VRR Motion Performance
Recommended VRR OD Setting
Fast
Variable Overdrive Advertised
No
Avg. CAD
169
Best CAD
153
Worst CAD
198

Refresh RateCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
159HeatmapChartPhoto
144HeatmapChartPhoto
120HeatmapChartPhoto
100HeatmapChartPhoto
80HeatmapChartPhoto
60HeatmapChartPhoto

The LG UltraGear 34GP83A-B has good motion handling across its entire refresh rate range with VRR enabled in the recommended 'Fast' Response Time setting, though there's still some motion blur. The 'Fastest' overdrive setting has such a high CAD that it passes the limits of our chart, and you can see it in an alternative chart here.

7.5
Motion
Refresh Rate Compliance
Compliance @ Max Hz
51%
Compliance @ 120 FPS
60%
Compliance @ 60 FPS
75%

The refresh rate compliance is good. Although its response time isn't fast enough to make full color transitions before the monitor draws the next frame at its max refresh rate and at 120Hz, it's better at 60Hz.

7.8
Motion
CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
OD Transition Max Refresh Rate
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Fast
Avg. CAD
153
Best 10% CAD
86
Worst 10% CAD
261

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
OffHeatmapChartPhoto
NormalHeatmapChartPhoto
FastHeatmapChartPhoto
FasterHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at the max refresh rate is good, but there's still some motion blur. The 'Normal' and 'Fast' overdrive settings have a similar total response time, but 'Fast' has less motion blur, while the 'Faster' setting has too much inverse ghosting.

Motion
Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Fast
First Response Time
5.7 ms
Total Response Time
6.1 ms
RGB Overshoot
1 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
10.8 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
10.8 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
8 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
OffHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
NormalHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FastHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FasterHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

7.7
Motion
CAD @ 120Hz
OD Transition 120Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Fast
Avg. CAD
157
Best 10% CAD
86
Worst 10% CAD
257

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
OffHeatmapChartPhoto
NormalHeatmapChartPhoto
FastHeatmapChartPhoto
FasterHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at 120Hz is good, but there's still some motion blur. The 'Normal' and 'Fast' overdrive settings have a similar total response time, but 'Fast' has less motion blur, while the 'Faster' setting has too much inverse ghosting.

Motion
Response Time @ 120Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Fast
First Response Time
5.4 ms
Total Response Time
6.9 ms
RGB Overshoot
2 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
8.8 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
11.9 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
14 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
OffHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
NormalHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FastHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FasterHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

7.5
Motion
CAD @ 60Hz
OD Transition 60Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Normal
Avg. CAD
177
Best 10% CAD
101
Worst 10% CAD
282

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
OffHeatmapChartPhoto
NormalHeatmapChartPhoto
FastHeatmapChartPhoto
FasterHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at 60Hz is good. The 'Normal' overdrive setting has the fastest total response time and almost no overshoot, unlike at higher refresh rates.

Motion
Response Time @ 60Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Normal
First Response Time
7.1 ms
Total Response Time
8.0 ms
RGB Overshoot
0 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
10.6 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
17.1 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
5 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
OffHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
NormalHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FastHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FasterHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

Motion
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
No BFI
Maximum Frequency
N/A
Minimum Frequency
N/A
Longest Pulse Width Brightness
N/A
Shortest Pulse Width Brightness
N/A
Pulse Width Control
No BFI
Pulse Phase Control
No BFI
Pulse Amplitude Control
No BFI
VRR At The Same Time
No BFI

The monitor doesn't have an optional black frame insertion feature to reduce persistence blur further.

9.1
Motion
VRR Flicker
Dark Gray Flicker
0.7 RGB
Middle Gray Flicker
0.5 RGB
Light Gray Flicker
0.4 RGB

This monitor has minimal VRR flicker with changing frame rates, which is fantastic for gaming.

10
Motion
Image Flicker
Flicker-Free
Yes
PWM Dimming Frequency
0 Hz

The backlight remains flicker-free at all brightness levels, which helps reduce eye strain if you're sensitive to flicker.

Inputs
8.9
Inputs
Input Lag
Native Resolution @ Max Hz
4.0 ms
Native Resolution @ 120Hz
5.0 ms
Native Resolution @ 60Hz
9.3 ms
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
N/A

This monitor has low input lag for a responsive feel while gaming.

7.7
Inputs
Resolution
Native Resolution
3440 x 1440
Aspect Ratio
21:9
Megapixels
5.0 MP
Pixel Density
110 PPI
4.9
Inputs
PS5 Compatibility
4k @ 120Hz
No
4k @ 60Hz
Yes
1440p @ 120Hz
Yes
1440p @ 60Hz
Yes
1080p @ 120Hz
Yes
1080p @ 60Hz
Yes

Because the console doesn't support ultrawide signals, you'll see black bars on the sides unless you stretch the image.

6.8
Inputs
Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
4k @ 120Hz
No
4k @ 60Hz
Yes
1440p @ 120Hz
Yes
1440p @ 60Hz
Yes
1080p @ 120Hz
Yes
1080p @ 60Hz
Yes

You need to use the console's HDMI override to get 1440p @ 60Hz. This isn't required with any other combination of resolution and refresh rate. The Xbox doesn't support HDR with 1440p or 1080p signals, so this isn't a limitation of the monitor. However, because the console doesn't support ultrawide signals, you'll see black bars on the sides unless you stretch the image.

Inputs
Inputs Photos
Inputs
Video And Audio Ports
DisplayPort
1 (DP 1.4)
Mini DisplayPort
No
HDMI
2 (HDMI 2.0)
HDMI 2.1 Rated Speed
No HDMI 2.1
DVI
No
VGA
No
Daisy Chaining
No
3.5mm Audio Out
1
3.5mm Audio In
No
HDR10
Yes
3.5mm Microphone In
No
Inputs
USB
USB-A Ports
2
USB-A Rated Speed
5Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 1)
USB-B Upstream Port
Yes
USB-C Ports
0
USB-C Upstream
No USB-C Ports
USB-C Rated Speed
No USB-C Ports
USB-C Power Delivery
No USB-C Ports
USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode
No USB-C Ports
Thunderbolt
No
Inputs
macOS Compatibility

The LG 34GP83A works well with macOS. VRR only works up to 144Hz, so if you want to use the overclockable 160Hz, you need to use a fixed refresh rate instead. There aren't any noticeable issues with VRR in the desktop and games, except there's a thin gray bar at the top of the screen in games. When using a MacBook windows return to their original position when you wake the laptop up from sleep or open the lid.

Features
Features
Additional Features
Speakers
No
RGB Illumination
No
Multiple Input Display
No
KVM Switch
No

The LG 34GP83A has a few additional features, including:

  • Crosshair: Adds a virtual crosshair on the screen.
  • Black Stabilizer: Makes objects more visible in dark scenes.
  • Reader Mode: Blue light filter to help reduce eye strain.

Features
On-Screen Display (OSD)