Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

Dell Alienware AW3418DW  Monitor Review

Reviewed Sep 21, 2018 at 08:56am
Tested using methodology v1.1 
Dell Alienware AW3418DW
7.4
Mixed Usage 
7.8
Office 
7.7
Gaming 
7.2
Multimedia 
7.3
Media Creation 
5.4
HDR Gaming 
 2
Notice: This monitors was replaced by Dell Alienware AW3420DW

The Dell Alienware AW3418DW is very good curved ultrawide IPS LCD monitor with a 3440x1440 resolution. It has very wide viewing angles so the sides of the screen remain accurate when viewed from up-close. The Alienware has a fast response time and very low input lag that will please most hardcore gamers and it also supports NVDIA's G-SYNC implementation of variable refresh rate so it can deliver smooth motion without tearing. Unfortunately, it can't produce deep, uniform blacks and it is not well suited for a dark room.

Our Verdict

7.4
Mixed Usage 

The Dell Alienware AW3418DW is a good monitor for mixed usage. Its large size and good resolution make it good for gaming use as well as office use, as it allows for multitasking. It has a low input lag that makes it very responsive. If you place it in an average lit room, you will enjoy the picture quality.

Pros
  • Image remains accurate when viewed at an angle
  • Good gaming features like G-SYNC
  • Large, high resolution screen
Cons
  • Mediocre brightness
  • Poor dark scene performance
7.8
Office 

The Dell Alienware AW3418DW is a good monitor for office use. The good size and excellent resolution allow you to do more with your screen area and the viewing angles make it easy to share your work with a colleague. The monitor's ergonomics make it easy to position it as you prefer.

7.7
Gaming 

The Dell Alienware AW3418DW is a very good gaming monitor. It has a low input lag that makes it very responsive to your actions and supports NVIDIA's G-SYNC. Its large screen and high resolution can display every little detail of your favorite game. You can easily position it to your likings, and its thin bezels will not bother you if you expand your screen area by placing a second monitor next to it.

7.2
Multimedia 

The Dell AW3418DW is a decent monitor for multimedia. It has a large size and a high resolution that allow you to watch movies and videos in high resolution. It has a high refresh rate so fast action has little blur and it is easy to position to your preference. Unfortunately, its poor black uniformity and low contrast ratio do not make it suitable for a dark room.

7.3
Media Creation 

This is a good monitor for media creation. The large screen size and the excellent resolution allow for multitasking. It has a low input lag and responds fast to your actions and handles reflections well when placed it in a room with many light sources. Working together with a colleague will not be an issue.

5.4
HDR Gaming 

This monitor does not support HDR. If you are looking for a monitor with HDR support, check out the Samsung CHG70.

  • 7.4
    Mixed Usage
  • 7.8
    Office
  • 7.7
    Gaming
  • 7.2
    Multimedia
  • 7.3
    Media Creation
  • 5.4
    HDR Gaming
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Dec 16, 2022: Simplified the name to Dell Alienware AW3418DW and made changes throughout the review to reflect this change.
    2.  Updated Jan 13, 2022: Checked the FreeSync compatibility.
    3.  Updated Jun 23, 2020: Converted to Test Bench 1.1.
    4.  Updated Jan 07, 2019: The gradient score has been updated, as it was scored incorrectly at the time of the review.

    Check Price

    34"Alienware AW3418DW
    SEE PRICE
    Amazon.com
    34"Alienware AW3418DW
    SEE PRICE
    Amazon.com
    34"Alienware AW3418DW
    SEE PRICE
    Amazon.com

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the Dell Alienware AW3418DW, which is a UWQHD 3440x1440 IPS gaming monitor. There are 3 other variants of the Alienware lineup with different sizes and characteristics - a selection of which are listed in the table below.

    If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their monitor doesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we will update the review. Note that some tests such as the gray uniformity may vary between individual units.

    Model Size Panel Type Resolution VRR Support
    AW2518H 25" TN FHD 1920x1080 G-SYNC
    AW2518HF 25" TN FHD 1920x1080 FreeSync
    AW3418HW 34" IPS WFHD 2560x1080 G-SYNC
    AW3418DW 34" IPS UWQHD 3440x1440 G-SYNC

    The monitor we bought was manufactured in June 2018.

    Popular Monitor Comparisons

    Comparison picture

    Left: Dell U3417W. Middle: Dell Alienware AW3418DW. Right: Samsung CHG90.
    Unlike our other photographs, this picture wasn't taken under a controlled environment, so do not draw conclusions from it.

    The Dell Alienware AW3418DW is a good monitor for most usages and especially for gaming (see our recommendations for the best gaming monitors, the best ultrawide gaming monitors, the best 1440p gaming monitors, and the best curved gaming monitors).

    Dell U3417W

    The Dell Alienware AW3418DW is better than the Dell U3417W. The Alienware has a much lower input lag, less trail blur, and a faster refresh rate which help it deliver a great gaming experience.

    LG 34UC79G-B

    The Dell Alienware AW3418DW is somewhat better than the LG 34UC79G-B. The Dell has a better resolution so you can see more detail on your screen and better reflection handling so you won't be bothered if your room has many lights. Its ergonomics make it also easier to position as you prefer. The LG has an optional black frame insertion feature that can clear blur and make the image crisper.

    ASUS ROG Swift PG348Q

    The Dell Alienware AW3418DW is marginally better than the ASUS ROG PG348Q. The Alienware has a little faster refresh rate and produces a little less blur in fast-moving content. Also, the Alienware has lower input lag and responds slightly quicker to your actions giving you a small edge in gaming. Other than those minor differences, the two monitors are very similar.

    ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q

    Unless you're looking for a more immersive gaming experience, the ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q is better than the Dell Alienware AW3418DW. The ASUS has a lower resolution screen, but a higher refresh rate, better ergonomics, and an optional black frame insertion feature. The AW3418DW, on the other hand, delivers a more immersive gaming experience, thanks to the 34" curve, 21:9 screen.

    Show more 

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    Style
    Size34"
    CurvedYes
    Curve Radius1900R
    Weight (without stand)
    16.8 lbs (7.6 kg)
    Weight (with stand)
    25.6 lbs (11.6 kg)
    Stand
    Width
    22.1" (56.1 cm)
    Depth
    12.5" (31.8 cm)

    The stand supports the monitor well and there is little wobble. Its design blends with the overall futuristic design of this monitor.

    6.3
    Ergonomics
    Height Adjustment
    5.1" (13.0 cm)
    Switch Portrait/LandscapeNo
    Swivel Range-20° to 20°
    Tilt Range-25° to 2.5°

    The Dell Alienware AW3418DW has decent ergonomics. You can adjust the height, swivel left and right and tilt up and down, but there is no option to rotate. Nonetheless, the degrees of freedom should be enough to allow you to position it according to your preferences.

    Back
    Wall MountVESA 100x100

    When looking the Dell Alienware AW3418DW from the back, the modern design with the abundance of straight lines and flat clear planes becomes apparent. The inputs are hidden and there is provision for cable management through the stand.

    Borders
    Borders
    0.4" (1.0 cm)

    The borders of the Dell AW3418DW are thin. There is a vent that runs along the top border and serves for heat dissipation. The bezel is very thin and the panel starts at the edge of the border. The screen pixels, however, start after a small gap. It is nonetheless a very good monitor for side by side use.

    Thickness
    Thickness (with stand)
    11.0" (27.9 cm)
    Thickness (without stand)
    4.8" (12.2 cm)

    The Dell Alienware AW3418DW is quite thick mainly due to the stand and the curve. Without the stand, this is a relatively thin monitor.

    8.5
    Build Quality

    The build quality of the Alienware AW3418DW is excellent. There are no gaps or loose ends and the monitor feels sturdy.

    Picture Quality
    6.0
    Contrast
    Native Contrast
    981 : 1
    Contrast With Local Dimming
    N/A

    The native contrast ratio of the Dell Alienware AW3418DW is sub-par. A low contrast ratio is expected in IPS panels and results in blacks that appear gray in the dark. The Alienware's native contrast ratio is slightly better than the Dell U3417W.

    0.0
    Local Dimming
    Local Dimming
    No
    Backlight
    Edge

    Local dimming is not supported. The video is for reference only.

    7.1
    SDR Peak Brightness
    SDR Real Scene
    262 cd/m²
    SDR Peak 2% Window
    283 cd/m²
    SDR Peak 10% Window
    283 cd/m²
    SDR Peak 25% Window
    284 cd/m²
    SDR Peak 50% Window
    284 cd/m²
    SDR Peak 100% Window
    284 cd/m²
    SDR Sustained 2% Window
    283 cd/m²
    SDR Sustained 10% Window
    283 cd/m²
    SDR Sustained 25% Window
    283 cd/m²
    SDR Sustained 50% Window
    284 cd/m²
    SDR Sustained 100% Window
    284 cd/m²
    SDR ABL
    0.000

    Decent peak brightness for the Dell Alienware AW3418DW. The monitor is not suitable for a very bright room with a lot of glare. The good news is that the brightness remains constant regardless of the window size.

    0.0
    HDR Peak Brightness
    HDR Real Scene
    N/A
    HDR Peak 2% Window
    N/A
    HDR Peak 10% Window
    N/A
    HDR Peak 25% Window
    N/A
    HDR Peak 50% Window
    N/A
    HDR Peak 100% Window
    N/A
    HDR Sustained 2% Window
    N/A
    HDR Sustained 10% Window
    N/A
    HDR Sustained 25% Window
    N/A
    HDR Sustained 50% Window
    N/A
    HDR Sustained 100% Window
    N/A
    HDR ABL
    N/A

    HDR is not supported.

    8.7
    Horizontal Viewing Angle
    Color Washout From Left
    51°
    Color Washout From Right
    51°
    Color Shift From Left
    57°
    Color Shift From Right
    49°
    Brightness Loss From Left
    52°
    Brightness Loss From Right
    53°
    Black Level Raise From Left
    70°
    Black Level Raise From Right
    70°
    Gamma Shift From Left
    59°
    Gamma Shift From Right
    62°

    Very good horizontal viewing angles for this monitor. The best we have measured so far along with the ASUS ROG PG348Q. This monitor will display the same image quality at very large side angles.

    6.6
    Vertical Viewing Angle
    Color Washout From Below
    31°
    Color Washout From Above
    31°
    Color Shift From Below
    42°
    Color Shift From Above
    37°
    Brightness Loss From Below
    36°
    Brightness Loss From Above
    34°
    Black Level Raise From Below
    18°
    Black Level Raise From Above
    70°
    Gamma Shift From Below
    32°
    Gamma Shift From Above
    32°

    The vertical viewing angles of the Dell AW3418DW monitor are decent. The picture quality appears uniform at the bottom side of the screen, but if you place the monitor slightly higher than your eye level, you might notice some slight uniformity issues at the top side of the screen.

    8.3
    Gray Uniformity
    50% Std. Dev.
    3.856%
    50% DSE
    0.127%
    5% Std. Dev.
    0.480%
    5% DSE
    0.062%

    The gray uniformity of the Dell Alienware AW3418DW is good. There is some visible issues in the 50% gray image but this is mostly closer to the top edge and should not be distracting in normal use. There is no visible dirty screen effect. In the darker shades, the uniformity is excellent.

    5.3
    Black Uniformity
    Native Std. Dev.
    2.495%
    Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
    N/A

    The Dell AW3418DW has poor black uniformity. There is clouding all over the image and there is visible backlight bleed in the lower two corners. This is very similar to Samsung CF791.

    6.7
    Pre Calibration
    Picture Mode
    Game 1,2,3
    Luminance
    209 cd/m²
    Luminance Settings
    75
    Contrast Setting
    75
    RGB Controls
    100-100-100
    Gamma Setting
    No Gamma Setting
    Color Temperature
    7,070 K
    White Balance dE
    3.77
    Color dE
    3.56
    Gamma
    2.40

    The 'Standard', 'Game 1', 'Game 2' and 'Game 3' Preset Modes were all nearly identical out of the box. The 'Game 1,2,3' modes allow you to set values for Dark Stabilizer and 'Red, Green, Blue, Cyan, Magenta, Yellow' saturation that are specific to that mode, allowing you to customize each 'Game' mode for a different use case or game.

    The out of the box color accuracy of these modes is decent. White balance dE and color dE are both above our threshold of 3, and that means that most enthusiast users will notice some color inaccuracies. The color temperature is cold, and a bluish tint is apparent. Gamma averages 2.4, and doesn't track our target curve, and the image looks darker than what it should be.

    9.6
    Post Calibration
    Picture Mode
    Custom Color
    Luminance
    100 cd/m²
    Luminance Settings
    26
    Contrast Setting
    75
    RGB Controls
    96-95-100
    Gamma Setting
    No Gamma Setting
    Color Temperature
    6,468 K
    White Balance dE
    0.63
    Color dE
    0.60
    Gamma
    2.18

    After calibration, the color inaccuracies almost disappear. White balance dE and color dE are very low and it is almost impossible to spot inaccuracies. The color temperature is very close to our target of 6500 K, and gamma is almost perfectly tracking our target curve .

    You can download our ICC profile calibration here. We don't recommend using this profile, as the calibration values vary per individual unit, even for the same model, due to manufacturing tolerances.

    8.8
    SDR Color Gamut
    sRGB xy
    99.0%
    Adobe RGB xy
    77.1%
    sRGB Picture Mode
    Custom Color
    Adobe RGB Picture Mode
    Custom Color

    Excellent color gamut for the Dell AW3418DW. The monitor covers almost all of the sRGB space. However, the wider Adobe RGB color space used in professional printing or publishing applications is not adequately covered. If you are looking for a monitor that covers those needs check out the Acer Predator X27 and our recommendations for the best monitors for photo editing.

    9.0
    SDR Color Volume
    sRGB In ICtCp
    96.6%
    Adobe RGB In ICtCp
    82.4%
    sRGB Picture Mode
    Custom Color
    Adobe RGB Picture Mode
    Custom Color

    Excellent color volume coverage for this Dell AW3418DW. At various luminance values, the monitor can display a wide range of colors of the sRGB color space. However, in the darker shades, it is slightly limited by its low native contrast ratio. The Adobe RGB color volume coverage is confined by the limited Adobe RGB color space coverage and the low contrast ratio.

    0.0
    HDR Color Gamut
    Wide Color Gamut
    No
    DCI P3 xy
    N/A
    Rec. 2020 xy
    N/A
    DCI P3 Picture Mode
    No HDR
    Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
    No HDR

    HDR is not supported.

    0.0
    HDR Color Volume
    DCI-P3 In ICtCp
    N/A
    Rec. 2020 In ICtCp
    N/A
    DCI P3 Picture Mode
    No HDR
    Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
    No HDR

    HDR is not supported.

    10
    Image Retention
    IR After 0 Min Recovery
    0.00%
    IR After 2 Min Recovery
    0.00%
    IR After 4 Min Recovery
    0.00%
    IR After 6 Min Recovery
    0.00%
    IR After 8 Min Recovery
    0.00%
    IR After 10 Min Recovery
    0.00%

    No image retention is visible, which is excellent. Even after 10 minutes of a high contrast static image, no remnants are visible.

    8.6
    Gradient
    Color Depth
    8 Bit

    Update 01/07/2019: The gradient score has been updated (7.2 -> 8.6), as it was scored incorrectly at the time of the review.

    There's 8-bit banding in all colors; however, this should not be an issue for normal use.

    10
    Color Bleed
    Pixel Row Error
    0.000%
    Pixel Column Error
    0.000%

    When displaying large bands of a single color, no bleed can be seen and the colors appear uniform.

    7.0
    Reflections
    Screen Finish
    Matte
    Total Reflections
    6.1%
    Indirect Reflections
    2.9%
    Calculated Direct Reflections
    3.1%

    The Dell Alienware AW3418DW has good reflection handling. Very similar to the Dell U3417W. The curve helps diffuse point sources across the screen and thus reduce their intensity. The light-matte finish helps diffuse them even further, so this monitor will do well even in a fairly bright room.

    7.5
    Text Clarity
    Pixel Type
    IPS
    Sub-Pixel Layout
    RGB
    Motion
    7.5
    Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
    Best Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    Rise / Fall Time
    4.2 ms
    Total Response Time
    15.6 ms
    Overshoot Error
    13.2%
    Dark Rise / Fall Time
    4.3 ms
    Dark Total Response Time
    17.1 ms
    Dark Overshoot Error
    19.2%

    Refresh Rate Tested: 120 Hz

    Response Time 'Normal'
    Response Time 'Fast'
    Response Time 'Super Fast'

    The Alienware is a fast monitor. The response time is low, and this means only a small blur will trail the image. Response Time 'Normal' is the best overdrive setting as 'Fast' and 'Super Fast' have unacceptable levels of overshoot causing image duplications. In the 'Super Fast' option, the overshoot from 0% to 20% is so much that it clips.

    5.2
    Response Time @ 60Hz
    Best Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    Rise / Fall Time
    4.4 ms
    Total Response Time
    24.3 ms
    Overshoot Error
    22%
    Dark Rise / Fall Time
    4.8 ms
    Dark Total Response Time
    23.8 ms
    Dark Overshoot Error
    29.5%
    10
    Image Flicker
    Flicker-FreeYes
    PWM Dimming Frequency
    0 Hz

    This monitor does not use PWM Dimming to lower the backlight and this is good as it makes motion look smoother.
    On the other hand, this monitor lacks the option of introducing flicker to make the image crisper. This is a surprise as it supports G-SYNC and we would expect it to also support ULMB which is NVIDIA's implementation of black frame insertion.

    0.0
    Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
    Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
    No BFI
    BFI Maximum Frequency
    N/A
    BFI Minimum Frequency
    N/A
    8.7
    Refresh Rate
    Variable Refresh Rate
    G-SYNC
    Native
    100 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate
    120 Hz
    Variable Refresh Rate
    Yes
    FreeSync
    No
    G-SYNC
    Yes (Native)
    VRR Maximum
    100 Hz
    VRR Minimum
    < 20 Hz
    VRR Supported ConnectorsDisplayPort

    Update 01/13/2022: We checked the FreeSync compatibility again, and changed the result to 'No' from 'Compatible'. Over HDMI, the refresh rate is limited to 50Hz, and FreeSync doesn't work at all. You can achieve 120Hz over a DisplayPort connection, but it's not considered FreeSync compatible in the Radeon Control Panel.

    Excellent refresh rate. The Alienware AW3418DW supports the G-SYNC implementation of VRR. However, it is only supported through DisplayPort and not through HDMI that has a lower bandwidth. Over HDMI at 3440x1440 resolution, the monitor's maximum refresh rate is 50Hz, although other resolutions such as 1080p can run at 60Hz.

    If you want a slightly higher refresh rate, Dell has a similar monitor with a 120Hz panel, the Dell Alienware AW3420DW.

    Inputs
    9.4
    Input Lag
    Native Resolution
    5.3 ms
    Native Resolution @ 60Hz
    13.1 ms
    Variable Refresh Rate
    6.1 ms
    Variable Refresh Rate @ 60Hz
    12.8 ms
    10 Bit HDR
    N/A
    Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
    N/A

    Refresh Rate Tested: 120 Hz

    The monitor has an excellent low input lag, which makes it very responsive. It is suitable for hardcore gaming as it reacts to your input almost instantaneously.

    Over DisplayPort the only supported resolutions are (3440x1440, 1024x768, 800x600, 640x480), and only 3440x1440 is capable of refresh rates greater than 60 Hz. This isn't usually a problem though because most graphics cards will upscale lower resolutions to 3440x1440 without you even knowing.

    8.7
    Resolution And Size
    Native Resolution3440 x 1440
    Aspect Ratio21:9
    Megapixels5.0 MP
    Pixel Density
    109 PPI
    Screen Diagonal34.1"
    Screen Area415 in²

    This Dell Alienware AW3418DW has an excellent resolution for its size. You are able to easily multitask, and you will see every little detail your game has to offer.

    Inputs
    Total Inputs
    DisplayPort1 (DP 1.2)
    Mini DisplayPortNo
    HDMI1 (HDMI 1.4)
    DVINo
    VGANo
    DisplayPort OutNo
    USB4 (USB 3.0)
    USB CNo
    Analog Audio Out 3.5mm2
    Microphone In 3.5mmNo
    Digital Optical Audio OutNo
    Analog Audio Out RCANo
    Power SupplyInternal

    One 3.5mm audio out is for headphones and has adjustable volume, while the other is a line out with fixed volume, which is useful when using external speakers.

    Features
    Additional Features
    RGB Illumination
    Controllable
    Speakers
    No
    HDR10No
    Multiple Input Display
    No

    This monitor does not have speakers or HDR10 support but has a few neat additional features:

    • Frame Rate counter
    • Timer
    • Display Alignment overlay
      This is useful for lining up multiple monitors.
    • Dark Stabilizer
      This raises the gamma curve to brighten dark shades, which is useful in some games to make dark details more visible. Unlike similar features on other monitors, Dark Stabilizer does not raise the black level.
    • AlienFX Lighting
      The monitor has several LED zones on its body. Each zone can be set to a different color, or all zones can be made to cycle through colors at the same time, using the 'Spectrum' option. The LEDs can also be controlled by AlienFX software on a PC when the USB hub is connected, which allows even more features such as reactive lighting in certain AlienFX supported games.

    On-Screen Display (OSD)
    Controls

    The controls are quite good. There are more buttons than most monitors, and it's easy to navigate the OSD which is designed really well. The buttons are easy to click and give good feedback.
    However, we still prefer a joystick like the ones found on LG 34UC79G-B or the Acer Predator X27.

    In The Box

    • Manual
    • Displayport to Mini Displayport cable
    • Displayport cable
    • USB Cable
    • Power cable

    Comments

    1. Product

    Dell Alienware AW3418DW: Main Discussion

    Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

    PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
    Sort by:
    newest first
    1. 4
      3
      2
      3
      0

      The regular content in your images doesn’t look too bad, but you’re right, during the startup phase it looks pretty bad. We have seen some reports that the local dimming feature doesn’t work during app and system startup. Does adjusting the local dimming setting help at all?

    2. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      The flashy cloudy picture while loading netflix or while rebooting is normal. your blooming while watching content looks also normal to me and its more noticeable in HDR than in SDR, because in HDR you crank up all the brightness and contrast.

      Blooming is unpreventable when a TV has this number of dimming zones.

      The blooming on my X900F does not bother me, in my opinion it is not distracting at all while watching content, because my eyes get dazzled anyway by the source of light which is causing the blooming, in total i would have to focus my eyes to the blooming spot to see it, but i just dont do this while watching. I hope you guys understand what i try to say xD

    3. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Your second batch of pics, regular viewing content looks good/normal (viewing thru pics on my phone anyway). I get it, the first batch of pics looks bad and uneven, but it only a start up screen, no big deal. I would try to find a scene in a movie, show or maybe even a game with mostly black content on the screen with a bright object, (maybe a dark sky and a bright moon) and compare it to those start up screen pics. If you have similar results, yeah the 900f’s performance should be way better. Also I’m pretty sure all Sony’s w/local dimming have 4 settings for its Local Dimming algorithm. (My Z9D has this) High, Med., Low, Off. Check the settings.

    4. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      The regular content in your images doesn’t look too bad, but you’re right, during the startup phase it looks pretty bad. We have seen some reports that the local dimming feature doesn’t work during app and system startup. Does adjusting the local dimming setting help at all?

      Thanks for your response Adam.

      Yes, I have tried all local dimming settings and doesn’t resolve the issue. This is a FALD Tv And it shouldn’t be doing this.

      Here is a link to images on more noticeable blooming referencing light background on black.

      What do you think?

      https://imgur.com/a/NZhxFYw

    5. 3
      2
      1
      2
      0

      The flashy cloudy picture while loading netflix or while rebooting is normal. your blooming while watching content looks also normal to me and its more noticeable in HDR than in SDR, because in HDR you crank up all the brightness and contrast.

      Blooming is unpreventable when a TV has this number of dimming zones.

      The blooming on my X900F does not bother me, in my opinion it is not distracting at all while watching content, because my eyes get dazzled anyway by the source of light which is causing the blooming, in total i would have to focus my eyes to the blooming spot to see it, but i just dont do this while watching. I hope you guys understand what i try to say xD

      Thank you.

      I have been doing some research on this for mixed results. There are many reports of no backlight bleeding issues on start up and Netflix screen or content viewing. But there are many who are experiencing the same issue. I wonder if this is a legitimate issue that is hampering the pic quality of this tv and some people are not noticing it or accepting it as normal. They could be getting a better pic quality to the full potential of this tv but people don’t know it.

      Here is a link to better examples of backlight bleeding.

      https://imgur.com/a/NZhxFYw

    6. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Your second batch of pics, regular viewing content looks good/normal (viewing thru pics on my phone anyway). I get it, the first batch of pics looks bad and uneven, but it only a start up screen, no big deal. I would try to find a scene in a movie, show or maybe even a game with mostly black content on the screen with a bright object, (maybe a dark sky and a bright moon) and compare it to those start up screen pics. If you have similar results, yeah the 900f’s performance should be way better. Also I’m pretty sure all Sony’s w/local dimming have 4 settings for its Local Dimming algorithm. (My Z9D has this) High, Med., Low, Off. Check the settings.

      Thank you.

      Tried all local dimming setting but it’s not addressing the issue.

      Here are better examples of backlight bleeding.

      https://imgur.com/a/NZhxFYw

    7. 3
      2
      1
      2
      0

      Hi Adam and team I’m only commenting here as I couldn’t find how to start a new topic ! I am looking to buy a 65" tv from Currys in UK I already bought a SK8500 and returned it immediately as blooming and slow backlight response made me absoltely sick. I use TV for 2 key activities 1-As a regular windows PC monitor / web browsing (which terribly burn an OLED due to constant static pictures) 2-Watching movies daily in a completely dark room with subtitles

      Due to activity 1, I don’t think an OLED is safe for me. But I also can’t look at blooming around subtitles and slowly responding dimming features or blacks looking like grays. Considering these constraints, I just couldn’t find an affordable TV. I’m closest to X900F and NU8000 but they still have blooming issues. Is there anything better you can recommend for my use cases? I can get a cheap LG b8 OLED but I’m too scared of burn-in during PC monitor use…

      Thanks

    8. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Hi Adam and team I’m only commenting here as I couldn’t find how to start a new topic ! I am looking to buy a 65" tv from Currys in UK I already bought a SK8500 and returned it immediately as blooming and slow backlight response made me absoltely sick. I use TV for 2 key activities 1-As a regular windows PC monitor / web browsing (which terribly burn an OLED due to constant static pictures) 2-Watching movies daily in a completely dark room with subtitles

      Due to activity 1, I don’t think an OLED is safe for me. But I also can’t look at blooming around subtitles and slowly responding dimming features or blacks looking like grays. Considering these constraints, I just couldn’t find an affordable TV. I’m closest to X900F and NU8000 but they still have blooming issues. Is there anything better you can recommend for my use cases? I can get a cheap LG b8 OLED but I’m too scared of burn-in during PC monitor use…

      Thanks

      X900F and NU8000 are probably your best picks. Despite the reported blooming issues, with regular content this really shouldn’t be very noticeable.

    9. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Between the two, I would definitely go with the Sony 900f. At regular price, the 900f is probably the best bang for your buck TV out there. (Excluding the Vizio PQ-65 for multiple reasons)

    10. 1
      0
      -1
      0
      0

      The flashy cloudy picture while loading netflix or while rebooting is normal. your blooming while watching content looks also normal to me and its more noticeable in HDR than in SDR, because in HDR you crank up all the brightness and contrast.

      Blooming is unpreventable when a TV has this number of dimming zones.

      The blooming on my X900F does not bother me, in my opinion it is not distracting at all while watching content, because my eyes get dazzled anyway by the source of light which is causing the blooming, in total i would have to focus my eyes to the blooming spot to see it, but i just dont do this while watching. I hope you guys understand what i try to say xD

      Thank you.

      I have been doing some research on this for mixed results. There are many reports of no backlight bleeding issues on start up and Netflix screen or content viewing. But there are many who are experiencing the same issue. I wonder if this is a legitimate issue that is hampering the pic quality of this tv and some people are not noticing it or accepting it as normal. They could be getting a better pic quality to the full potential of this tv but people don’t know it.

      Here is a link to better examples of backlight bleeding.

      https://imgur.com/a/NZhxFYw

      I also no longer encounter backlight bleeding on netflix startup, but i definitely saw this in the beginning. Maybe it depends on the picture-settings. My main Picture-settings when starting netflix are: cinema pro, Brightness 20, contrast max, local dimming high, contrast-enhancer off, x-tended d range off.

      I do not have a big problem with blooming. When i watch HDR movies, i sometimes see it, but its so negligible for my eyes. In SDR with lower brightness, it is even better.

      Once i read a user-report who said he badly suffered from blooming and bleeding, he changed the panel or TV, i dont know anymore, and the new panel was way better.

      So MAYBE…its within the panel-lottery. But i really dont know.

      Edited 6 years ago: xxx
    11. 1
      0
      -1
      0
      0

      HI! I also have this “problem”. Basically when i boot up my TV (when i hard reset it) and when i fire up netflix or apps… My picture gets all bloomy and flashlighty but that is normal as FALD system is not engaged and the beginning of the apps or the startup have not been optimized for the light as basically every time I reboot it the brightness gets automatically set to MAX and in dark rooms with brightness on MAX you are going to see a “sh*tstorm” of bloom and uneven lighting but as soon as system loads up and i play a movie that is SDR (I set to brightness 1 as that is “100 nit” and is most acurate brightness setting for SDR) none of these issues appear EVEN with XDR on high (which increases SDR image a lot in my opinion) or HDR/DV movie/show. Now when I say “none of these issues appear” I don’t mean I don’t see no bloom or light bleed. I DO see them but like if we say the startup or netflix logo is rated at 100%, in movies/ shows be it SDR with XDR or HDR/DV with XDR I would rate it 2.5 and without XDR in both standards SDR and HDR/DV i would rate it 1. It is present but present just like with your TV. People who say they don’t see bloom are either lying or are blind or actually do not know what light bloom/bleeding is and they don’t know whether they’re seeing it they believe that is part of the movie image. It would be alarming if we saw the same or near same light bloom/bleeding/flashlighting when we play movies/shows in HDR/SDR. So you can be at peace and if you are annoyed at light bloom in the black bars from spectral lights you can (just like i am planning to do) install LED lights (stick them to the back of TV) at the back of the TV so that they light up the wall. The light bloom will disappear and image will look much better with much higher “perceived” contrast. I tested this and it is really working. The annoyed small light bleeds or blooms literally disappear and my brain actually believes the picture is much better in contrast (Dumbass brain huh!) and i can be at peace and relax while watching movie without blooming.

    12. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      This is not an issue, this is how Sony tvs work. Local dimming doesn’t engage on boot screen and loading screens. Every Sony FALD set works this way. There is no issue taking place. I have owned 5 Sony FALD sets and they all perform this way. Just enjoy your movies and tv shows and forget about the boot screen and loading screens.

    13. 1
      0
      -1
      0
      0

      Blooming on start up, app start, menu, and any onscreen display are because the menu background is not a pure black, it’s dark grey with transparant effect rather than black. And when it was displayed, all the dimming feature are set to off.

    14. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Hi, in 2018 I had a Sony 900f in a 55’ and had blooming issues. What I did was go back in the menu to motion and set motionflow to custom and clearness to 1. Also, you could try setting black level to either 48 or 45 and set your brightness to 40 and set sharpness to 90.

    15. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      well i got the 49 900f and i gotta say i regret this purchase very much. It’s ok for sdr however, in hdr10 or dolby vision, the tv is almost unwatchable when it has to deal with dark scenes. It only has 25 local dimming zones which if i knew i would of not bought it in the first place. I have the 55 in 950g and it just so much better. I wonder what other cutbacks they made on this model outside of cutting its dimming zones in half from the 55 inch. i got the 49.5 as that what is a good fit for my bedroom but really not cool what sony did to this tv. To answer you the tv blooms alot as it lacks dimming zones . Going to have it tested on the 9th for peak brightness cause i doubt the numbers given on this site are accurate for this size model. To sum it up i bought hdr tv that only performs in sdr very disappointing. Btw… also has washed out colors in hdr. Also wasted another 300$ to have it pro calibrated hoping it would improve the situation it did not.

      Edited 5 years ago: just adding
    16. 1
      0
      -1
      1
      -1

      Wow, $300 to have it calibrated, that is like a third of the TV price. I think these calibrations are a joke. I did it once, although half the price and switch it back to the way I had it. Trial and error. What people don’t understand about calibration is, you may see your TV display in a way that looks perfect to you and not to another. Sure there are color calibration tools, but your eyes may not see it as a computer sees it, as perfect color calibration. Even calibration disks, forget it. No matter how you feel about the NHL, put on a hockey game. The white ice gives you a perfect measurement for contrast against the blue lines and red face off circles. Once you have that your liking, just season the color to your liking. Boom, basic TV calibration, and honestly, your eyes can’t really do much more against these silly TV options. I have a Sony Z9D. Color options like blue/green/red offset/gain, I have never worn glasses, I’m pretty sure my vision is as close to 20/20 as possible, these changes do absolutely nothing to my display against my eyes.

      Ok, now as far as the 900f, it’s no Z9D, but unless you go OLED, blooming is going to happen. The smallest OLED that I know of is a 55”, but even if you bought a 55” 900f, that price is going to be a lot less than a similar size OLED. As far as the 950g, sure it’s a better TV, especially with ultimate chip, but when the 950g first came out, it was so much more expensive then the 900f, all sizes across the board. Most people will see the 900f as an amazing TV, but if your looking for those imperfections like me, (again I went Z9D even over OLED, because OLEDs are so dim, and ABL on those things are such a bitch) the 900f is an amazing TV at its price point.

      Edited 5 years ago: Spellcheck is a bitch
    17. 1
      0
      -1
      1
      -1

      I’m at 200, I need to get a life. 😜😁

      Edited 5 years ago: Idk???
    18. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Wow, $300 to have it calibrated, that is like a third of the TV price. I think these calibrations are a joke. I did it once, although half the price and switch it back to the way I had it. Trial and error. What people don’t understand about calibration is, you may see your TV display in a way that looks perfect to you and not to another. Sure there are color calibration tools, but your eyes may not see it as a computer sees it, as perfect color calibration. Even calibration disks, forget it. No matter how you feel about the NHL, put on a hockey game. The white ice gives you a perfect measurement for contrast against the blue lines and red face off circles. Once you have that your liking, just season the color to your liking. Boom, basic TV calibration, and honestly, your eyes can’t really do much more against these silly TV options. I have a Sony Z9D. Color options like blue/green/red offset/gain, I have never worn glasses, I’m pretty sure my vision is as close to 20/20 as possible, these changes do absolutely nothing to my display against my eyes. Ok, now as far as the 900f, it’s no Z9D, but unless you go OLED, blooming is going to happen. The smallest OLED that I know of is a 55”, but even if you bought a 55” 900f, that price is going to be a lot less than a similar size OLED. As far as the 950g, sure it’s a better TV, especially with ultimate chip, but when the 950g first came out, it was so much more expensive then the 900f, all sizes across the board. Most people will see the 900f as an amazing TV, but if your looking for those imperfections like me, (again I went Z9D even over OLED, because OLEDs are so dim, and ABL on those things are such a bitch) the 900f is an amazing TV at its price point.

      yeah i bought 900f for that reason in a rush as i needed a 4k tv at the time i just regret it and i agree the pro calibration helped a few things with the white levels but all in all it did not do much to improve the performance in hdr and dolby vision, the 950g got more dimming zones, better chip and its brighter than the 900f. Therefore it’s really not worth it getting a 900f for a 100$ price difference at this point over the 950g. Especially if you watch alot in dolby and hdr10.

      Edited 5 years ago: refining
    19. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Hi, for the 900F just use HDMI port 3 and that will solve al the blooming issues associated with this set.

    20. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      well i got the 49 900f and i gotta say i regret this purchase very much. It’s ok for sdr however, in hdr10 or dolby vision, the tv is almost unwatchable when it has to deal with dark scenes. It only has 25 local dimming zones which if i knew i would of not bought it in the first place. I have the 55 in 950g and it just so much better. I wonder what other cutbacks they made on this model outside of cutting its dimming zones in half from the 55 inch. i got the 49.5 as that what is a good fit for my bedroom but really not cool what sony did to this tv. To answer you the tv blooms alot as it lacks dimming zones . Going to have it tested on the 9th for peak brightness cause i doubt the numbers given on this site are accurate for this size model. To sum it up i bought hdr tv that only performs in sdr very disappointing. Btw… also has washed out colors in hdr. Also wasted another 300$ to have it pro calibrated hoping it would improve the situation it did not.

      Hi, I got a Sony X-900F 49 inch on Tuesday for the living room that performs like a champ. In order to get great picture quality on this television one has to activate its x-motion charity feature on it. I believe the (XMC) is the soul of the 900F. I have a Sony OLED downstairs, and this 49 inch looks that OLED in the eye.