The Dell S2719DGF is a decent 144Hz monitor with a TN panel and mediocre picture quality. It has great gaming features such as support for FreeSync variable refresh rate technology, incredibly low input lag, and very fast response time. It can get bright enough to combat glare, but it has bad dark room performance due to the low native contrast ratio and terrible black uniformity. It has disappointing viewing angles and the image is accurate only when you're sitting directly in front of it. However, the excellent ergonomics allow you to place it how you like, and fortunately, it has good out-of-the-box color accuracy.
The S2719DGF is a decent monitor for mixed usage. It has a very fast response time that leaves only minimal blur and a very low input lag to enhance the gaming experience. It has great size and resolution to allow you to multitask, and it can get bright enough to combat glare in most office environments. Unfortunately, it lacks good dark room performance with a low contrast ratio and terrible black uniformity.
The Dell S2719DGF is a decent monitor for office use. The screen size and native resolution are suitable for working with multiple windows open at the same time. It has excellent ergonomics and you can easily swivel it towards your coworker sitting next to you if you wish to share your work. It does a decent job at handling reflections, so you won't have to worry if a few small light sources are facing the monitor.
The S2719DGF is a great monitor for gaming. It's very responsive to your actions due to the incredibly low input lag, and its extremely fast response time ensures that fast-moving content looks clear. It has a great resolution and large size for an immersive gaming experience, and it also supports FreeSync VRR to reduce screen tearing.
Decent monitor for multimedia. The S2719DGF is very responsive due to the low input lag, and it has great size and resolution so you can see every detail in your favorite videos. Unfortunately, the best image quality is reserved for those sitting directly in front of it due to the disappointing viewing angles.
The Dell S2719DGF is a decent monitor for media creation. It has a great resolution and size that allows you to open many windows on your screen. It has a great color gamut for casual users, but professionals might find it limiting. Unfortunately, the viewing angles are disappointing and you'll lose image accuracy when viewed from the side. On the upside, adjusting it how you like is easy due to the excellent ergonomics.
The Dell S2719DGF doesn't support HDR.
We tested the 27 inch S2719DGF, and there are two other sizes available in the same family of monitors, which are listed below.
|Model||Size||Native Resolution||Refresh rate||Notes||Year|
If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their Dell S2719DGF doesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we will update the review. Note that some tests such as the gray uniformity may vary between individual units.
Our unit was manufactured in November 2018, and you can see the label here.
The Dell S2719DGF is a decent monitor overall. It's great for gaming thanks to its many gaming-related features, and it's priced quite competitively too, so it tends to be a good choice if you're looking for a gaming monitor. See our recommendations for the best gaming monitors, the best 27 inch monitors, and the best budget gaming monitors.
The Dell S2721DGF is much better overall than the Dell S2719DGF. The S2721DGF has a faster refresh rate, and the IPS panel delivers much better viewing angles. The S2721DGF adds HDR support, but due to the low peak brightness and disappointing contrast, this doesn't add much.
The LG 27GL83A-B is much better than the Dell S2719DGF. Since the LG uses an IPS panel, it offers much better viewing angles. Black uniformity is also significantly better on the LG, and it supports HDR, while the Dell doesn't. However, ergonomics and reflection handling are much better on the Dell, and they both perform similarly in terms of motion handling.
The Dell S2716DG has very similar performance to the Dell S2719DGF, and the minor differences can be attributed to panel variance. The most significant difference between them is that the S2719DGF supports FreeSync VRR whereas the S2716DG supports G-SYNC VRR and incorporates a BFI feature that the S2719DGF is lacking.
The LG 27GL850-B is much better than the Dell S2719DGF for most uses, especially if ergonomics aren't important for you. The LG has much better picture quality, with wide viewing angles, much better gradient handling, and HDR support. The LG also has slightly better motion handling, with a slightly faster response time, resulting in slightly clearer motion.
The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is significantly better than the Dell S2719DGF. The ASUS has an IPS panel that provides much better viewing angles, contrast ratio, black uniformity, and it supports HDR. However, the Dell has a significantly better motion handling, peak brightness, and reflection handling.
These are two different types of monitors, each with their advantages and disadvantages. The LG 27UK650-W, however, performs better in most uses except gaming. The LG has wider viewing angles, supports HDR, and has better dark room performance, although it still isn't too great. The Dell S2719DGF, on the other hand, has a TN panel with an extremely fast response time, and in conjunction with the lower input lag, it's a better choice if gaming is your primary use and you sit straight in front.
The HP OMEN 27 and the Dell S2719DGF both have very similar performance in almost all uses. The Dell S2719DGF supports FreeSync VRR whereas the HP Omen 27 supports G-SYNC VRR. The Dell has better ergonomics, but the HP has a black frame insertion (BFI) feature that isn't available on the Dell.
The Dell S2719DGF is better than the LG 24GL600F. The Dell has a larger, higher-resolution screen, and significantly better ergonomics. The LG has an optional black frame insertion feature, but overall, motion handling is very similar between the two.
The AOC AGON AG271QX is a bit better than the Dell S2719DGF. The AOC AGON AG271QX has much better black uniformity and thus less backlight bleed in very dark scenes in a dark room. The Dell S2719DGF, on the other hand, has slightly better ergonomics which can be helpful depending on your setup.
The Dell S2417DG is slightly better than the Dell S2719DGF for most people. The S2417DG has a smaller screen, but it supports NVIDIA G-SYNC and has an optional black frame insertion feature. The Dell S2719DGF, on the other hand, supports FreeSync, which is compatible with more devices, including the Xbox One.
The Dell S2719DGF is marginally better than the ASUS PB277Q. The Dell S2719DGF has a much higher refresh rate and supports FreeSync which makes it a better gaming monitor. In most other uses, the two monitors perform very similarly.
Although the two monitors have a different panel type, most people will agree that the ASUS ROG PG279QZ is much better than the Dell S2719DGF. The ASUS has much better viewing angles due to its IPS panel and supports G-SYNC, whereas the Dell supports FreeSync. The ASUS has much better black uniformity and incorporates a BFI feature that can make the image crisper.
The AOC CQ27G1 is a slightly better monitor than the Dell S2719DGF. The AOC uses a VA panel, so it has a much better contrast ratio and black uniformity, and the colors are more accurate. Meanwhile, the Dell uses a TN panel, so it has a much quicker response time at its max refresh rate of 155Hz and at 60Hz. Both monitors have native FreeSync support, but the Dell is also compatible with some NVIDIA graphics cards.
For most people, the VA panel Samsung CHG70 is significantly better than the TN panel Dell S2719DGF. The Samsung CHG70 has better dark room performance with more uniform blacks and local dimming support. The Samsung CHG70 supports HDR content and has a slight curve to immerse you into your work. The Dell S2719DGF, on the other hand, has a more versatile stand that allows you to place it in a comfortable position with ease, and a slightly faster pixel response time that leaves virtually no blur behind fast-moving objects.
The Dell U2718Q is significantly better than the Dell S2719DGF for most uses, but the S2719DGF is better for gaming. The U2718Q has a higher resolution screen, with better viewing angles, HDR support, and much better black uniformity. The S2719DGF is better for gaming, with a higher refresh rate, FreeSync support, and a flicker-free backlight.
The Dell Alienware AW3418DW is better than the Dell S2719DGF for most uses, but the S2719DGF is a bit better for gaming. The AW3418DW has a wide-format screen, wide viewing angles, and better black uniformity. The S2719DGF, on the other hand, has a higher refresh rate, better ergonomics, and a faster response time, making it a better choice for gaming.
The Acer Nitro VG271UP Pbmiipx is better than the Dell S2719DGF. The VG271UP has much better viewing angles, better gray uniformity, and it supports HDR. The VG271UP also has an optional black frame insertion feature.
These are two different types of monitors, each with its advantages and disadvantages. However, in its overall performance, the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is significantly better than the Dell S2719DGF. The AORUS has wider viewing angles and a lower input lag. The response time is fast, but not as fast as the TN panel Dell S2719DGF. The AORUS AD27QD supports HDR, although its HDR performance isn't that great.
The DellS2719DGF and the Nixeus EDG 34 are very similar monitors in terms of overall performance. The 27 inch Dell uses a TN panel so it has a much better response time, resulting in clearer motion, and it has a wider range of refresh rates. However, the VA panel on the 34 inch Nixeus provides much better picture quality with great contrast ratio, fantastic gray uniformity, and unlike the Dell, it displays a wide color gamut. The Dell is more suited to gaming, while the Nixeus performs better for everyday use.
The Acer Nitro XF252Q Xbmiiprzx is slightly better than the Dell S2719DGF. The XF252Q supports HDR, although this doesn't add much, and it has an optional black frame insertion feature to help improve the appearance of motion. The Dell S2719DGF has a higher native resolution, which is easier for multitasking and makes it easier to see more fine details in games.
The MSI Optix MAG271CQR is slightly better than the Dell S2719DGF. The MSI has much better contrast, better gray uniformity, and an optional black frame insertion feature. The Dell, on the other hand, has better ergonomics, so it's a bit easier to place it in an ideal viewing position.
The ASUS VG279Q is a bit better than the Dell S2719DGF. The VG279Q has much better black uniformity, although it still isn't great, and the VG279Q has an optional black frame insertion feature. The S2719DGF has a higher resolution screen, which some people might prefer, and it has a faster response time.
Although they use different panel technologies, the Acer Nitro VG271 Pbmiipx is much better than the Dell S2719DGF. The Acer displays more uniform blacks and supports HDR, great for dark room gaming. It also has wider viewing angles so you can share your screen with a friend, and both enjoy an accurate image. The Dell, on the other hand, has a higher resolution and a TN panel, which is great for gaming. The response time of the Dell is extremely fast, and fast-moving content on your games will appear crisp with almost no blur trail.
The LG 27GL650F-B is much better than the Dell S2719DGF for most uses, but the Dell is a bit better for gaming. The LG supports HDR, has better viewing angles, and an optional black frame insertion feature. The Dell has better ergonomics and a faster response time, and a higher native resolution.
The ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHD is better than the Dell S2719DGF. The ViewSonic's IPS panel has much wider viewing angles, a higher contrast ratio, and significantly better black uniformity. However, the Dell is more adjustable due to its excellent ergonomics, its build quality is much better, and it has a slightly higher refresh rate.
The Dell S2719DGF is a bit better monitor than the ASUS TUF VG27VQ. The Dell uses a TN panel, so it has a much better response time, providing a better gaming experience, and it can get brighter and does a somewhat better job at handling reflections. The ASUS uses an IPS panel, so it has better overall picture quality and it's more suited for dark-room gaming thanks to its much better contrast ratio and black uniformity. The difference between the two really comes down to personal preference and how you're going to use it.
The BenQ EW3270U and the Dell S2719DGF have different panel types, each with advantages and disadvantages. The BenQ supports HDR and has a significantly better black uniformity, which favors dark room use such as consuming multimedia or playing HDR games. The Dell, apart from having better ergonomic adjustments, is a better gaming monitor thanks to the faster pixel response time that produces crisper motion, the faster refresh rate, and the lower input lag.
The Acer Predator XB271HU Bmiprz is better than the Dell S2719DGF. The Acer has better viewing angles, an optional black frame insertion feature, and better black uniformity. For gaming, it depends somewhat on your hardware, as the Acer supports G-SYNC variable refresh rate technology whereas the Dell supports FreeSync.
The back of the monitor is very plain. All the inputs are in the back and are facing downwards so they won't protrude if you VESA-mount it.
Cable management is serviced through a hole on the stand, just like most other Dell monitors.
The S2719DGF doesn't have a local dimming feature. The video above is provide for reference only.
Impressive SDR peak brightness. The S2719DGF maintains its brightness across different content extremely well and it can get bright enough to combat glare in most rooms.
This monitor doesn't support HDR.
Mediocre horizontal viewing angles. Viewing from the side loses image accuracy, which isn't ideal if you need to share your screen with a coworker or for co-op gaming.
Poor vertical viewing angles. As is the case with most TN panels, the colors appear inverted if you mount the monitor above eye level. However, if you place it slightly below eye level, you won't lose much image accuracy.
Good gray uniformity. The edges are a bit darker, but this isn't noticeable with most content. There's minimal dirty screen effect in the center, which is great for watching sports or during panning shots. The monitor is nearly uniform in dark scenes.
Terrible black uniformity for the S2719DGF. Backlight bleed is visible almost everywhere and unfortunately, this is also noticeable in normal content, especially when displaying a uniform dark color. Note that black uniformity is panel-specific and will differ from unit to unit, but we have seen reports displaying similar uniformity.
Good out-of-box color accuracy. Most colors are somewhat inaccurate and the color temperature is warmer than the target of 6500K, so colors will be closer to red/yellow. The gamma follows the target well, but most scenes will be darker than intended.
After calibration, its color accuracy is excellent. It's almost impossible to spot any inaccuracy with the naked eye. The color temperature is also extremely close to the 6500K target, and the gamma follows the target curve more closely, so most scenes will be at their correct brightness.
You can download our ICC profile calibration here. This is provided for reference only and shouldn't be used, as the calibration values vary per individual unit even for the same model due to manufacturing tolerances.
Great SDR color gamut. The S2719DGF covers nearly all of the sRGB color space used in most content. Photo editors might be a bit disappointed with the somewhat limited coverage of the Adobe RGB space used in photo editing.
Amazing SDR color volume. It can display a wide range of colors, although it can't produce dark saturated colors due to the low contrast ratio. The color volume is still an improvement over the S2716DG.
This monitor doesn't support HDR.
This monitor doesn't support HDR.
There are no signs of temporary image retention, even immediately after showing our high contrast static test for 10 minutes.
Decent reflection handling on the S2719DGF. The matte coating diffuses light across the screen, reducing their reflections. Although this works well in dim rooms, reflections might be distracting in bright rooms. This is very similar to the Dell P2217H.
|Overdrive Setting||Response Time Chart||Response Time Tables||Motion Blur Photo|
Outstanding response time, which is normal for TN panels. The best Overdrive setting is 'Normal' since it has the least amount of overshoot and motion looks extremely clear. There's visible ghosting using the 'Fast' and 'Super Fast' settings.
|Overdrive Setting||Response Time Chart||Response Time Tables||Motion Blur Photo|
Excellent response time at 60Hz, which is great for people who want to use the S2719DGF for console gaming. When gaming at 60Hz, you might need to change the Overdrive setting compared to playing games at its max refresh rate. We recommend the 'Super Fast' setting, as motion looks the clearest, but the 'Normal' and 'Fast' settings perform similarly.
The S2719DGF doesn't have a black frame insertion feature to help reduce motion blur.
The Dell S2719DGF has a refresh rate of 144Hz but it can be overclocked to 155Hz. It supports FreeSync VRR technology to help reduce tearing in games.
Note: The overclocking feature is unavailable when using an HDMI cable. It's only available when the monitor is connected through a DisplayPort connection.
Incredibly low input lag. The input lag remains low even with VRR enabled, which is great for gamers.
Great resolution and size for the S2719DGF monitor. There's enough screen real estate to allow you to open many windows at once.
There's one upstream USB 3.0 port that allows the monitor to work as a USB hub. Also, one of the 3.5mm analog audio out ports is a headphone port with adjustable volume, while the other is a fixed volume line out port.
The S2719DGF has some common additional features for an enhanced gaming experience: