The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is a great 1440p, 144Hz gaming monitor. It has a great design, with RGB bias lighting, good ergonomics, and an easy-to-remove stand. It delivers good overall picture quality, but like most IPS monitors, it doesn't look as good in a dark room due to its low contrast ratio. This monitor has outstanding motion handling with very fast response time, a black frame insertion feature, and low input lag. Finally, it has a unique set of additional features that could give some gamers that extra little edge, including a unique active noise cancellation feature.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is a good monitor for most uses. It has wide viewing angles, good ergonomics, and great peak brightness. Gamers will appreciate the fast response time, FreeSync support, low input lag, and an impressive array of additional features to enhance your gaming experience. Unfortunately, it has a low contrast ratio and terrible black uniformity, but it has excellent out-of-box color accuracy.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is a good office monitor. The 27 inch, 1440p screen offers plenty of space to open multiple windows at once, and the good ergonomics allow you to place the monitor how you like. It has great horizontal viewing angles for when you need to share your screen with others, but the vertical viewing angles are just decent, which is only a problem if someone's looking down at the monitor.
Great gaming monitor. The 144Hz Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD supports FreeSync variable refresh rate technology to reduce screen tearing, and it's compatible with newer NVIDIA graphics cards. The input lag is incredibly low and the quick response time produces clear motion. Unfortunately, it doesn't perform well in dark rooms due to its low contrast ratio, but it has great viewing angles.
Good monitor for multimedia. The image remains accurate when viewed at an angle, which is great for sharing the latest trends with a group of friends. The fast response time delivers clear motion, with very little blur. Unfortunately, the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD isn't as well-suited for watching videos in a dark room though, as it has a mediocre contrast ratio and terrible black uniformity.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is good for media creation. It has an excellent SDR color gamut and great coverage of the wider Adobe RGB color space. The 27 inch screen and 1440p resolution allow you to see more of your work at once, so you spend less time scrolling around or zooming. Unfortunately, it has some color bleed that could cause issues for photo editing, but it has excellent out-of-box color accuracy.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is a decent monitor for HDR gaming. It has decent peak brightness in HDR, but small highlights in some scenes aren't as bright as they should be. It can display a wide color gamut, which is great, but it's limiting and doesn't add much to HDR. Unfortunately, it has a mediocre contrast ratio, terrible black uniformity, and there's no local dimming feature to further darken any blacks.
We tested the 27 inch Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD, which is the only size available. Gigabyte produces a few other monitors, which you can see below.
|CV27Q||27"||VA||2560x1440||165Hz||Supports DisplayPort 1.4|
|FI27Q-P||27"||IPS||2560x1440||165Hz||Supports DisplayPort 1.4|
If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD doesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we will update the review. Note that some tests, such as the gray uniformity, may vary between individual units.
The AD27QD we reviewed was manufactured in December 2018, and you can see the label here.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is a great gaming monitor at an aggressive price and has some impressive additional features. See our recommendations for the best gaming monitors, the best 1440p 144Hz monitors, and the best 1440p gaming monitors.
The ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A is a bit better than the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD. The ASUS's refresh rate can be overclocked to 170Hz, it has a quicker response time, and built-in speakers. However, the Gigabyte has much better out-of-the-box color accuracy, and it gets brighter in SDR.
The Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q is slightly better than the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD in most uses. As these two monitors have a nearly identical design and feature set, their performance is also very similar. The main difference is that the FI27Q has a much wider HDR color gamut, but its response time is slower than the AD27QD. The FI27Q has bad black uniformity, but it's still an improvement over the AD27QD.
The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is somewhat better than the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD. The ASUS' refresh rate is faster, which helps motion look smoother. The ASUS also has better ergonomics, which is important if you often move your monitor around as you can quickly position it comfortably in the new location. Finally, the ASUS delivers more uniform blacks, although neither of the two monitors can display deep blacks in a dark room due to their IPS panels.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD and the LG 27GL850 are very similar overall. For gaming, the LG has slightly better motion handling, and is the better choice if you are sensitive to motion blur or overshoot artifacts. The AD27QD is more feature-packed, including better ergonomics, an optional black frame insertion feature, and countless additional gaming features.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is a bit better than the Acer Predator XB273K Pbmiphzx. The AORUS has a higher refresh rate, better ergonomics so you can place it to a comfortable position with ease, supports FreeSync, and has a BFI feature to help improve the appearance of motion. The Acer, on the other hand, has a better resolution and can display more details of your game on the screen. It also natively supports G-SYNC.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is a bit better than the BenQ EX2780Q. The AORUS has significantly better ergonomics, out-of-box color accuracy, and gradient performance. The AORUS also has an optional black frame insertion feature to help reduce motion blur and a host of extra features for gaming and productivity. However, black uniformity is much worse on the AORUS, as there's noticeable clouding and backlight bleed through the screen.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is better than the Acer Predator XB271HU Bmiprz. The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD supports HDR content and has a wide color gamut that can display rich and saturated colors. The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD can handle reflections better and supports the FreeSync variable refresh rate technology for tear-free gaming. The Acer, on the other hand, has more uniform blacks and slightly better ergonomics. The Predator supports the G-SYNC variable refresh rate, which is great if you have a compatible NVIDIA graphics card.
The LG 27GN850-B and the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD are two very similar monitors. The LG is slightly better for gaming because it has a quicker response time at its max refresh rate and 60Hz. However, the Gigabyte is better for office use because it has improved ergonomics and it gets brighter, so it's a better choice for well-lit rooms.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD and the Pixio PX7 Prime are very similar overall. The PX7 Prime has a higher native refresh rate, but most people won't notice much difference. The AD27QD is a bit more feature-packed, with an optional black frame insertion feature and tons of gaming features, but otherwise performs about the same as the PX7 Prime.
The Acer Nitro XV273 Xbmiiprzx is marginally better than the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD. It has a higher refresh rate and better black uniformity, but the Gigabyte has a higher resolution and some nifty extra features such as active noise cancelling, picture-in-picture, and picture-by-picture. The Acer has a higher peak brightness and better reflection handling, making it a better choice for well-lit rooms.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is marginally better than the LG 27UK650. The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD has a lower input lag and a much higher refresh rate, which will please most gamers. The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD also supports a Black Frame Insertion feature that can make the image crisper. The LG 27UK650 has a full 4k resolution and allows you to see more details on your screen.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is much better than the AOC AGON AG271QX. The AORUS supports HDR, which is great, and has much wider viewing angles. The AD27QD also has an optional black frame insertion feature, which can help reduce persistence blur. The AGON has better black uniformity and a slightly faster response time, but this likely isn't noticeable. The AGON also has more inputs and supports older analog inputs from DVI and VGA cables.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD and the Acer Predator X27 both have very similar performance. The Gigabyte has a lower input lag, which is great for gaming, and better ergonomics to help you position it to your liking with ease. The Acer Predator X27, on the other hand, has better resolution and allows you to see more of your work on the screen. The X27 also supports local dimming and delivers better HDR performance.
These are two different types of monitors, each with its advantages and disadvantages. However, in its overall performance, the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is significantly better than the Dell S2719DGF. The AORUS has wider viewing angles and a lower input lag. The response time is fast, but not as fast as the TN panel Dell S2719DGF. The AORUS AD27QD supports HDR, although its HDR performance isn't that great.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD and ASUS ROG PG279Q are very similar overall. The PG279Q has slightly better black uniformity and supports NVIDIA's G-SYNC variable refresh rate technology. The AD27QD supports HDR, has much better gradients, and supports AMD's FreeSync technology with both AMD cards and NVIDIA's new FreeSync compatible drivers, making it a slightly more versatile choice if you have a 10- or 20- series NVIDIA GPU.
Unless you want to get the most out of your NVIDIA graphics card, the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is slightly better than the ASUS PG279QZ. The AORUS supports HDR and has a few extra gaming features designed to give you a slight edge in competitive games, and it supports FreeSync. Although the AORUS also works with NVIDIA's new FreeSync drivers, if you want a true G-SYNC experience, the ASUS is very similar overall.
The Samsung CHG70 and the AORUS AD27QD use different panels, and each is better for certain uses. The CHG70 uses a VA panel, which is better suited for dark room viewing, but the image degrades when viewed at an angle. The AD27QD, on the other hand, uses an IPS panel, and the image remains accurate when viewed at an angle. That said, it produces grayish blacks and generally doesn't look as good in a dark room.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is slightly better than the Razer Raptor 27 144Hz, and it's a bit better for gaming. The AORUS has a more adjustable stand, so it's easier to place it in an ideal viewing position. The AORUS also has a faster response time, resulting in slightly clearer motion, with less blur behind fast-moving objects.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is marginally better than the LG 27GL850. The Gigabyte has better ergonomics so you can easily place it comfortably, an optional black frame insertion feature, and many additional gaming features. The LG, on the other hand, has slightly faster response time and displays crisper motion.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD and the MSI Optix MPG27CQ use different panel technologies, but the AD27QD is much better overall, and slightly better for gaming. The AD27QD has an IPS panel, with wide viewing angles and a slightly faster response time. If viewing angles aren't important, the MPG27CQ has a VA panel, which looks much better in a dark room. Unlike the AORUS, the MSI doesn't support HDR, but this doesn't add much to the AORUS.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD is slightly better than the ASUS VG279Q. The AD27QD supports HDR, although there isn't much benefit to this. The AD27QD also has a higher native resolution, delivering a more immersive, detailed gaming experience. The VG279Q, on the other hand, has much better ergonomics and slightly better black uniformity.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD has a black design geared towards gamers. The stand is fairly large and stands out the most, but it shouldn't be out of place in an office environment.
The stand is wide-set, but the legs are thin and still allow small objects to be placed in front of them, similar to the Acer Predator X27. The stand supports the monitor well, but it still wobbles a bit when nudged.
Good ergonomics on the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD. The stand allows for all common adjustments, including switching it into portrait mode. Since the inputs are downward-facing, they're side-facing when in portrait mode, which is convenient.
The borders of the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD are thin, and well-suited for a multi-monitor setup.
The monitor is thick when mounted on the stand, but the display itself is thin, which is good if VESA-mounted.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD has a great overall build quality, with no obvious issues or construction flaws. The monitor feels solid and has a lot of metal.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD has a mediocre contrast ratio, like most IPS monitors. This results in grayish blacks, which ideal for dark scenes. The Samsung CHG70, which has a VA panel, has a much higher native contrast ratio.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD doesn't support local dimming. The above video is provided for reference only.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD has great peak brightness, very similar to the ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q. There's very little fluctuation in brightness with different content, which is great.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD has great horizontal viewing angles. The image remains accurate when viewed from the side, which is typical from IPS panels.
Okay vertical viewing angles. The edges of the screen will appear darker if you sit close to it. If you VESA mount the monitor above eye level, you'll lose some image accuracy.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD has excellent gray uniformity, similar to the PG279QZ. There's minimal dirty screen effect, which is great for browsing the web, or any other content with large uniform areas.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD has terrible black uniformity. There's noticeable backlight bleed and clouding throughout.
Excellent out-of-box color accuracy for the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD. Most colors appear as intended, but because the color temperature is warmer than the target of 6500K, some colors are closer to red/yellow. The gamma is below the target curve, so scenes are brighter than they should.
After calibration, any remaining inaccuracies are too small to be noticeable, and the gamma follows the curve almost perfectly.
You can download our ICC profile calibration here. This is provided for reference only and shouldn't be used, as the calibration values vary per individual unit even for the same model due to manufacturing tolerances.
Excellent SDR color gamut. The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD covers nearly all of the sRGB color space used in most content. Photo professionals should be happy with the impressive coverage of the Adobe RGB color space used in photo editing.
Outstanding color volume. It can display a wide range of colors thanks to its excellent SDR color gamut, but it can't display dark, saturated colors due to its low contrast ratio.
Decent HDR color gamut. It displays a wide color gamut, although it's a bit limiting, and it doesn't add much to HDR content.
Decent HDR color volume. Due to the somewhat limiting color gamut, the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD fails to display a very wide range of colors in HDR.
There are no signs of image retention on the Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD, even immediately after displaying our high contrast static test image for 10 minutes.
Outstanding gradient performance, with minimal signs of banding.
Unfortunately, there's noticeable vertical color bleed, which is worst than most other monitors. This shouldn't be noticeable with most content, but it isn't ideal for photo editing.
Decent reflection handling. There shouldn't be any issues in an average-lit room, but the reflections might be distracting in a room with direct sunlight.
The text clarity is okay. It can be improved using ClearType (top photo), which makes the diagonal lines on the letters R and N clearer.
|Overdrive Setting||Response Time Chart||Response Time Tables||Motion Blur Photo|
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD has a great response time. The best Overdrive setting is 'Balance', which performs very similarly to 'Picture Quality', but motion looks slightly better. There's significant overshoot on the 'Speed' setting with visible motion blur. if you want a monitor with an even quicker response time, look into the ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A.
|Overdrive Setting||Response Time Chart||Response Time Tables||Motion Blur Photo|
Good response time. Like at its max refresh rate, the recommended Overdrive setting at 60Hz is 'Balance'. It's quicker than the 'Picture Quality' setting and there's significantly less overshoot than the 'Speed' setting. If you prefer something with a quicker response time at 60Hz, look into the LG 27GN850-B.
The backlight is completely flicker-free, which helps reduce eye strain.
This monitor has a black frame insertion feature, which can be activated by enabling the Aim Stabilizer feature.
We noticed a few bugs with the BFI feature, but they're easy to work around. When first enabled, the BFI feature causes the brightness to drop significantly, which is normal, but this is a bit worse than average. Disabling and then enabling it causes the image to appear much brighter than intended and it has noticeable duplications, as seen here.
Update 06/25/2019: After updating the firmware on the AD27QD to F06, FreeSync now works properly when connected to an Xbox One, but only on HDMI Port 2.
Update 04/24/2019: NVIDIA released GeForce driver 430.39, which adds the AD27QD as an NVIDIA certified G-SYNC compatible monitor. With this update, FreeSync is automatically enabled when connected to a 10- or 20- series NVIDIA graphics card.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD supports FreeSync over both HDMI and DisplayPort, with the same excellent VRR range with either connector. We tested it with NVIDIA's new FreeSync drivers on our GTX 1060 6 GB, and it works perfectly, but only when connected via DisplayPort. This is the same as all other G-SYNC compatible monitors.
Update 08/28/2020: We made a mistake in our original testing for VRR and VRR @ 60Hz input lag, and the values were too low. We measured and updated the results.
Update 07/12/2019: The HDR input lag measurement of 3.9ms was erroneously tested with 8-bit color at 144Hz. Since we expect most people will use HDR with 10-bit color, we have retested the HDR input lag at 120Hz, with 10-bit color. The number has been updated.
Excellent low input lag. Even with HDR or VRR enabled, the input lag remains extremely low, which is great for even the most demanding gamers.
The 27 inch, 1440p screen is great for multitasking and provides a more immersive gaming experience than 1080p monitors.
It has a microphone-in port, which is necessary to use the ANC feature.
The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD has an impressive array of additional features, too many to list here. Some of the most useful features include:
This is just a summary of the additional features. For more information, see our additional review notes.