The Aorus AD27QD is a great 1440p, 144Hz gaming monitor. It has a great design, with RGB bias lighting, very good ergonomics, and an easy to remove stand. It delivers decent overall picture quality, but like most IPS monitors, it doesn't look as good in a dark room. The AD27QD has outstanding motion handling with an extremely fast response time, an optional black frame insertion feature, and low input lag. Finally, it has a unique set of additional features that could give some gamers that extra little edge, including a unique active noise cancellation feature.
The AD27QD is a great monitor for most uses. It has wide viewing angles, great ergonomics, and great peak brightness. Gamers will appreciate the fast response time, FreeSync support, and low input lag. It has an impressive array of additional features that make it easy to customize your viewing experience.See our Mixed Usage recommendations
Great monitor for office use. It has wide viewing angles and great ergonomics, making it easy to place it in an ideal viewing position or share your work. It has a large, high resolution screen that is great for multitasking, and it supports both picture-in-picture, and picture-by-picture modes.See our Office recommendations
The Aorus AD27QD is an excellent monitor for gaming. It has a fast response time that delivers excellent clear motion, and an optional black frame insertion feature. It has low input lag, and supports FreeSync over both HDMI and DisplayPort. The additional gaming features make it easy to adjust the monitor so you can perform your best.See our Gaming recommendations
Very good monitor for multimedia. The image remains accurate when viewed at an angle, which is great for sharing the latest trends with a group of friends. The fast response time delivers clear motion, with very little blur trail. Unfortunately, it isn't as well-suited for watching videos in a dark room though, as it has a mediocre contrast ratio and poor black uniformity.See our Multimedia recommendations
The AD27QD is great for media creation. It has an excellent SDR color gamut, and great coverage of the wider Adobe RGB color space. The 27" screen and 1440p native resolution allows you to see more of your work at once, so you spend less time scrolling around or zooming. Unfortunately, it has bad color bleed that could cause issues for photo editing.See our Media Creation recommendations
The Aorus AD27QD is a decent monitor for HDR gaming. It has decent peak brightness in HDR, but small highlights in some scenes aren't as bright as they should be. It can display a wide color gamut, which is great. Unfortunately, there is no local dimming feature, and it has a mediocre native contrast ratio.See our HDR Gaming recommendations
The Aorus AD27QD has a great design, very similar to the Acer Predator X27. The stand doesn't take up too much space and has good ergonomics, allowing you to easily place the monitor in a comfortable position or share your screen with someone else. The monitor is well-built with a solid construction, and there are no obvious issues in build quality. There is a convenient carrying handle and RGB bias lighting, but no headphone stand, unlike the AOC AGON AG271QX.
The stand is wide-set, but the legs are thin and still allow small objects to be placed in front of them, similar to the Predator X27. They support the monitor well, but it still wobbles a bit when nudged.
The Aorus AD27QD has very good ergonomics. It can be rotated to a portrait orientation, which is great, and it can swivel from side to side, making it easier to share your screen with someone nearby.
The borders of the AD27QD are thin, and well-suited for a multi-monitor setup.
The monitor is thick when mounted on the stand, but the display itself is thin, making it good if VESA mounted.
The AD27QD has good overall build quality, with no obvious issues or construction flaws. The monitor feels solid and has a lot of metal.
The AD27QD has a mediocre contrast ratio, like most IPS monitors. This results in grayish blacks, and isn't ideal for dark scenes. This isn't as good as the CHG70, which has a VA panel, and a much higher native contrast ratio. Unfortunately, there is no local dimming feature that could improve the contrast ratio.
The Aorus AD27QD does not support local dimming. The above video is provided for reference only.
Great peak brightness, very similar to the ASUS PG279Q. There is very little fluctuation in brightness with different content, which is great. Brightness was measured with the 'Standard' Picture Mode.
Decent peak brightness in HDR, better than the Samsung CHG70. The peak brightness remains the same regardless of content, which is great, but as there is no local dimming feature, small highlights in some scenes don't stand out as much.
For HDR to work over DisplayPort, '1.2+HDR' must be enabled from the monitor's OSD.
The AD27QD has good horizontal viewing angles. When viewing at an angle, the contrast remains about the same, but the brightness and color accuracy gradually decrease as you move off angle. These results are about average for IPS monitors, and much better than their VA counterparts, like the Samsung CHG70.
When looking at the AD27QD from above or below, the image degrades more rapidly than the horizontal axis, but this is still about average for an IPS monitor. Again, the contrast stays about the same at any angle, but the brightness decreases and colors lose accuracy.
Unfortunately, the AD27QD has bad black uniformity. There is noticeable backlight bleed and clouding throughout the screen.
Out of the box, the Aorus AD27QD has outstanding accuracy, slightly worse than the ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q. Gamma follows the target curve, but is slightly low, causing most scenes to appear slightly too bright. Colors have excellent accuracy, below the threshold that most people are able to see, and the white point is very close to the target.
Strangely, the most accurate gamma is with the gamma setting set to Off.
After calibration, any remaining inaccuracies are too small to be noticeable, and gamma follows the curve almost perfectly. Strangely, the most accurate Gamma setting is Off.
You can download our ICC profile calibration here. This is provided for reference only and should not be used, as the calibration values vary per individual unit even for the same model due to manufacturing tolerances.
s.RGB Picture Mode: Standard (calibrated) Adobe RGB Picture Mode: Standard
The AD27QD covers the s.RGB color space almost entirely, which is great. In the wider Adobe RGB color space, it can't display the full range of greens, which isn't ideal for professional photo editing.
s.RGB Picture Mode: Standard Adobe RGB Picture Mode: Standard
Excellent SDR color volume, limited mainly by the mediocre native contrast ratio, although it can't produce very bright blues.
DCI P3 Picture Mode: Standard Rec. 2020 Picture Mode: Standard
Decent wide HDR color gamut, but it can't display the full range of any color, so HDR content doesn't look much different from SDR content.
DCI P3 Picture Mode: Standard Rec. 2020 Picture Mode: Standard
Decent HDR color volume. The AD27QD can't display the full range of HDR colors, and it can't produce deep, dark colors very well, due to the limited contrast ratio. Like with SDR content, it can't produce very bright blues, either.
There are no signs of image retention on the AD27QD, even immediately after displaying our high contrast static test image for 10 minutes.
The AD27QD has excellent gradient handling, with almost no signs of banding. It supports a 10-bit color input, but only when the refresh rate is set to 120Hz. When the monitor is set to 144Hz, it only supports 8-bit color, and there is a bit more banding visible.
Unfortunately, there is noticeable vertical color bleed, by far the worst of any monitor we've tested so far. This shouldn't be noticeable with most content, but it isn't ideal for photo editing.
Decent reflection handling overall. There shouldn't be any significant issues in a brightly lit office, but if you have a lot of large windows the reflections are more distracting.
The AD27QD has an outstanding fast response time, with only minor overshoot and very little motion blur. Some inverse ghosting can be seen due to the overdrive; if this bothers you, the 'Overdrive Balance' or 'Overdrive Picture Quality' modes have no overshoot, but the response time is slower. Although the overall response time is a bit faster than the Pixio PX7 Prime, there's also more noticeable overshoot.
The backlight is completely flicker-free, but has an optional black frame insertion feature, which is rare for FreeSync monitors. BFI can be activated by enabling the Aim Stabilizer feature, and is only supported at 120 Hz or 144 Hz.
We noticed a few bugs with the BFI feature, but they are easy to work around. When first enabled, the BFI feature causes the brightness to drop from 100 cd/m² to 32 cd/m². A brightness drop is normal with BFI, but this is a bit worse than average. Disabling and then enabling it causes the brightness to increase back up to 135 cd/m², and the image appears much brighter but has noticeable duplications, as seen here.
Update 06/25/2019: After updating the firmware on the AD27QD to F06, FreeSync now works properly when connected to an Xbox One, but only on HDMI Port 2.
Update 04/24/2019: NVIDIA released GeForce driver 430.39, which adds the AD27QD as an NVIDIA certified G-SYNC compatible monitor. With this update, FreeSync is automatically enabled when connected to a 10- or 20- series NVIDIA graphics card.
The Aorus AD27QD supports FreeSync over both HDMI and DisplayPort, with the same excellent VRR range with either connector. We tested it with NVIDIA's new FreeSync drivers on our GTX 1060 6 Gb, and it works perfectly, but only when connected via DisplayPort. This is the same as all other G-SYNC compatible monitors.
Unlike many 144 Hz monitors, there is no factory overclock.
Update 07/12/2019: The HDR input lag measurement of 3.9ms was erroneously tested with 8-bit color at 144Hz. Since we expect most people will use HDR with 10-bit color, we have retested the HDR input lag at 120Hz, with 10-bit color. The number has been updated.
Excellent low input lag, great for gaming. Even with HDR or VRR enabled, the input lag remains extremely low, which is great for even the most demanding gamers.
If input lag is important to you and you want the best gaming experience possible, check out our recommendations for the best gaming mice.
The 27", 1440p screen is great for multitasking and provides a slightly more immersive gaming experience than standard 1080p monitors.
The AD27QD has a great selection of inputs, with two HDMI 2.0 ports and 1 DisplayPort connection. It also has a microphone-in port, which is necessary to use the ANC feature.
The Aorus AD27QD has an impressive array of additional features, too many to list here. Some of the most useful features include:
This is just a summary of the additional features. For more information, see our additional review notes.
The controls are easy to access and easy to use. The monitor uses a joystick control, similar to LG monitors like the 27UK650.
We tested the Aorus AD27QD, which is the only size available, and the only monitor made by Gigabyte's Aorus gaming division.
If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their AD27QD doesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we will update the review. Note that some tests, such as the gray uniformity, may vary between individual units.
The AD27QD we reviewed was manufactured in Dec. 2018.
The Aorus AD27QD is an impressive gaming monitor at an aggressive price, and has some great additional features. See our recommendations for the best gaming monitors, the best 1440p 144Hz monitors, the best 1440p gaming monitors, and the best monitors for photo editing.
The Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD and the LG 27GL850 are very similar overall. For gaming, the LG has slightly better motion handling, and is the better choice if you are sensitive to motion blur or overshoot artifacts. The AD27QD is more feature-packed, including better ergonomics, an optional black frame insertion feature, and countless additional gaming features.
The Aorus AD27QD and ASUS ROG PG279Q are very similar overall. The PG279Q has slightly better black uniformity and supports NVIDIA's G-SYNC variable refresh rate technology. The AD27QD supports HDR, has much better gradients, and supports AMD's FreeSync technology with both AMD cards and NVIDIA's new FreeSync compatible drivers, making it a slightly more versatile choice if you have a 10- or 20- series NVIDIA GPU.
The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is somewhat better than the Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD. The ASUS' refresh rate is faster, which helps motion look smoother. The ASUS also has better ergonomics, which is important if you often move your monitor around as you can quickly position it comfortably in the new location. Finally, the ASUS delivers more uniform blacks, although neither of the two monitors can display deep blacks in a dark room due to their IPS panels.
The Samsung CHG70 and the Aorus AD27QD use different panels, and each is better for certain uses. The CHG70 uses a VA panel, which is better suited for dark room viewing, but the image degrades when viewed at an angle. The AD27QD, on the other hand, uses an IPS panel, and the image remains accurate when viewed at an angle. That said, it produces grayish blacks and generally doesn't look as good in a dark room.
The Gigabyte AD27QD is better than the Acer Predator XB271HU. The Gigabyte AD27QD supports HDR content and has a wide color gamut that can display rich and saturated colors. The Gigabyte AD27QD can handle reflections better and supports the FreeSync variable refresh rate technology for tear-free gaming. The Acer, on the other hand, has more uniform blacks and slightly better ergonomics. The Predator supports the G-SYNC variable refresh rate, which is great if you have a compatible NVIDIA graphics card.
The Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD is marginally better than the LG 27GL850. The AD27QD has better ergonomics so you can easily place it comfortably, an optional black frame insertion feature, and many additional gaming features. The LG, on the other hand, has slightly faster response time and displays crisper motion.
Unless you want to get the most out of your NVIDIA graphics card, the Aorus AD27QD is slightly better than the ASUS PG279QZ. The Aorus supports HDR and has a few extra gaming features designed to give you a slight edge in competitive games, and it supports FreeSync. Although the Aorus also works with NVIDIA's new FreeSync drivers, if you want a true G-SYNC experience, the ASUS is very similar overall.
The Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD and the MSI Optix MPG27CQ use different panel technologies, but the AD27QD is much better overall, and slightly better for gaming. The AD27QD has an IPS panel, with wide viewing angles and a slightly faster response time. If viewing angles aren't important, the MPG27CQ has a VA panel, which looks much better in a dark room. Unlike the Aorus, the MSI doesn't support HDR, but this doesn't add much to the Aorus.
The Aorus AD27QD is slightly better than the ASUS VG279Q. The AD27QD supports HDR, although there isn't much benefit to this. The AD27QD also has a higher native resolution, delivering a more immersive, detailed gaming experience. The VG279Q, on the other hand, has much better ergonomics and slightly better black uniformity.
The Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD and the Pixio PX7 Prime are very similar overall. The PX7 Prime has a higher native refresh rate, but most people won't notice much difference. The AD27QD is a bit more feature-packed, with an optional black frame insertion feature and tons of gaming features, but otherwise performs about the same as the PX7 Prime.
The Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD is slightly better than the Razer Raptor 27, and it's a bit better for gaming. The Aorus has a more adjustable stand, so it's easier to place it in an ideal viewing position. The Aorus also has a faster response time, resulting in slightly clearer motion, with less blur behind fast-moving objects.
These are two different types of monitors, each with its advantages and disadvantages. However, in its overall performance, the Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD is significantly better than the Dell S2719DGF. The Aorus has wider viewing angles and a lower input lag. The response time is fast, but not as fast as the TN panel Dell S2719DGF. The Aorus AD27QD supports HDR, although its HDR performance isn't that great.
The Gigabyte AD27QD is marginally better than the LG 27UK650. The Gigabyte AD27QD has a lower input lag and a much higher refresh rate, which will please most gamers. The Gigabyte AD27QD also supports a Black Frame Insertion feature that can make the image crisper. The LG 27UK650 has a full 4k resolution and allows you to see more details on your screen.
The Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD and the MSI Optix MAG271CQR use different panel technologies, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. The MSI is better-suited for a dark room, as it has better contrast. The Aorus has better ergonomics and better viewing angles, and it supports HDR.
The Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD and the Acer Predator X27 both have very similar performance. The Gigabyte has a lower input lag, which is great for gaming, and better ergonomics to help you position it to your liking with ease. The Acer Predator X27, on the other hand, has better resolution and allows you to see more of your work on the screen. The X27 also supports local dimming and delivers better HDR performance.
The Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD is a bit better than the Acer Predator XB273K. The Aorus has a higher refresh rate, better ergonomics so you can place it to a comfortable position with ease, supports FreeSync, and has a BFI feature to help improve the appearance of motion. The Acer, on the other hand, has a better resolution and can display more details of your game on the screen. It also natively supports G-SYNC.
The Acer Nitro XV273X is marginally better than the Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD. It has a higher refresh rate and better black uniformity, but the Gigabyte has a higher resolution and some nifty extra features such as active noise cancelling, picture-in-picture, and picture-by-picture. The Acer has a higher peak brightness and better reflection handling, making it a better choice for well-lit rooms.
The Aorus AD27QD is much better than the AOC AGON AG271QX. The Aorus supports HDR, which is great, and has much wider viewing angles. The AD27QD also has an optional black frame insertion feature, which can help reduce persistence blur. The AGON has better black uniformity and a slightly faster response time, but this likely isn't noticeable. The AGON also has more inputs and supports older analog inputs from DVI and VGA cables.