The Samsung MU4500 is a budget smart TV which supports an HD resolution. Unfortunately, its picture quality is poor, since its screen is not uniform and has areas brighter than others. It doesn't get that bright, and its odd native resolution makes standard 720P and 1080p content look very soft.
The Samsung M4500 doesn't perform well with most usages. Its soft image, narrow viewing angle and relatively low brightness stop it from having many good points. Fortunately, it does at least come with decent smart features.See our Mixed Usage recommendations
Bad TV for watching movies in a dark room. While the M4500 produces deep blacks with its great contrast ratio, they have very little uniformity. Distracting patches causes both blacks and greys to look dirty and uneven. Its low and non-standard native resolution add to the issue, as most content will look quite soft on this TV.See our Movies recommendations
The M4500 doesn't do a good job with TV shows in a bright room. Because its display uses a non-standard resolution, most content looks a little softer on this TV. While it does handle reflections decently, it cannot get bright enough to suit living rooms with lots of windows. It does at least give easy access to online content through its smart platform.See our TV Shows recommendations
Passable TV for watching Sports. Its low motion blur allows it to show fast content without showing long trails behind moving players. Unfortunately, though, its poor picture quality can often be a distraction.See our Sports recommendations
Most people will find the M4500 to be quite lacking for gaming. While it does have decent motion, its low resolution and soft image can make it difficult to spot smaller targets in shooter games. Its input lag is also a little high which some people might find distracting.See our Video Games recommendations
Poor choice for a PC monitor. The M4500's 768p resolution can be properly used when connected to a computer but it is still too low for more productive use. Its high input lag can make moving the mouse a little distracting, and its lack of support for 4:4:4 chroma means text will often look fuzzy.See our PC Monitor recommendations
The design of the M4500 is basic. It certainly won't stand out but is perfectly functional. It lacks some nice touches found on the higher end M5300 too (textured borders and metallic colored feet). The wide stand may make it more difficult to fit on a table but does provide stable support.
The wide-set plastic stand of the M4500 supports the TV well. It will wobble a bit if pushed, but is still quite stable.
Footprint of the 32" TV stand: 29.0" x 5.8"
The rear of the TV is simple and very similar to the slightly higher end M5300. It supports VESA for wall mounting which is good, however, some of the inputs directed out the back may be difficult to access.
The M4500 has some of the thickest borders of any TV we've tested. They are made of shiny plastic which does attract fingerprints too.
The TV appears fairly thick when viewed from the side. It will stick out a bit when wall mounted.
The TV stays fairly cool, likely because it's not very bright. The power brick, on the other hand, reaches a maximum of 44 °C, which feels warm to the hand but isn't too hot to touch.
The build quality of the M4500 is fine. It is entirely plastic and does feel quite cheap but this is unlikely to cause any issues with normal use.
The Samsung M4500 has an excellent native contrast ratio. With over 4500:1, the M4500 can display really deep black, which is perfect for a dark or very dim home theater room. Dark scene in movies are well detailed and overall, this high contrast ratio is beneficial to most content.
The Samsung M4500 does not have a local dimming feature. The video is for reference only.
Mediocre SDR peak brightness, good enough for a moderately lit room but not bright enough for a bright room. The TV's CE dimming dims the picture during very dark scenes, as shown by our 2% white window test, but otherwise the brightness remains fairly consistent. Overall the brightness is a little less than most of the M4500's competitors like the Samsung M5300, the TCL D100 and the LG LJ5500; but still brighter than the value leading TCL S305.
HDR is not supported.
The M4500 gray uniformity is disappointing. Most of the uniformity issues are from the corners being darker than the center of the screen and the top and bottom edges being a bit brighter. Some faint vertical lines are also visible and the right side of the screen is also a bit brighter than the left side. Unfortunately, dirty screen effect is visible when watching normal content, especially sport like hockey or football.
Looking at the 5% gray test picture, the uniformity is a bit better than on the 50%, but some of the issues noticed before on the 50% are still visible here, especially the brighter top and bottom edge, and also the right side of the screen being brighter than the rest of the screen.
Bad viewing angle, but fairly typical for a TV with a VA panel. Dark shades wash out rapidly at an angle, while colors and brightness aren't badly degraded until viewed from moderate angles. Overall, this TV isn't well suited for a room where people often sit to the side of the TV and view it at an angle.
The black uniformity of the M4500 is sub-par. Similarly to what was noticed on the gray uniformity test, the right side of the screen is brighter than the rest, and the top and bottom edge are also a bit brighter.
The M4500 is decent at handling reflections. Similar to most other TVs is has a semi-gloss finish which diffuses reflection across the screen and reduces their intensity. This is fine for an average or dark room, but in a bright room, the reflections will be distracting.
Out of the box, the accuracy of the Samsung M4500 is disappointing. The white balance dE and color dE are high enough so that pretty much anyone could notice the inaccuracy. The gamma is well above our 2.2 targets and looking at the gamma curve, we see that it is off target, especially in the lower IRE (dark), which could affect the dark scene in movies, causing dark crush.
Color-wize, the primary cause of problems of the M4500, is the fact that the white points drifter toward the warm color and all the rest of the color also drifting in the same direction.
After calibration, the accuracy of the M4500 is much better. The white balance was greatly corrected and after calibration has a dE of only 0.18, which is not noticeable even by professional. On the color side of thing, the dE was cut by half, but the dE (2.12) is still high enough that a professional who is used to work with calibrated TV would notice the inaccuracy, but for most people, it should be good enough.
As for the gamma, the gamma is now right on target (2.2) and the curve is not almost flat, which is much better than what it was before calibration.
You can see our calibration settings here.
Upscaling of 480p content such as DVDs is good. The image is slightly soft but still remains fairly detailed and very few artifacts are visible.
HD content such as 720p cable is upscaled well. The 1366x768 native resolution of the TV doesn't quite match the 1280x720 resolution of most cable, so the image is slightly blurry because it can't do 1-1 mapping. This is not very noticeable though.
Although the TV is able to accept a 1080p input, it cannot display it without downscaling to 1366x768. If your source can't output 1366x768, then the 1080p input is useful for high-quality content to avoid downscaling to 720p, then upscaling to the TVs native resolution which results in some loss of detail compared to only downscaling steps.
Mediocre color gamut, even for a TV without HDR. The TV can't even cover the entire SDR Rec 709 color space, so fully saturated colors will be shown a little less saturated than intended.
Bad color volume, but mostly limited by the TV's mediocre color gamut. The TV makes good use of the gamut it does have by extending it well to a range of brightness levels, though saturated red and blue can't get quite as bright as they should.
The M4500 is good at displaying our gradient test image, better even than many pricier Samsung TVs like the MU8000. The M4500 is capable of displaying a 10 bit gradient, which is strange for an SDR-only TV but is very welcome. Some banding issues can be seen in the darker areas of the photo, but this is fairly typical for 10 bit TVs, and will pose no problem when watching SDR content.
The M4500 does not suffer from temporary image retention, as we did not notice any image remnant from the burn-in scene, even right after the 10 minutes exposure.
We don't expect VA panels to experience permanent image retention, as the VA panel in our long-term test appears immune.
Good pixel response time, good enough for watching fast moving content like sports. Most of the blur in the photo is due to backlight flicker; only a short ghosting trail can be seen following the moving logo thanks to the good response time. The motion blur is similar to competing TVs like the TCL S305 and the LG LJ5500, but not quite as good as the Samsung M5300 because of its effective use of pixel overdrive.
The TV has backlight flicker that is always present, but is less noticeable at higher brightnesses. This is because the TV dims its brightness only by using PWM, which is, unfortunately, common in budget TVs. This flicker won't be too noticeable to most people, but may bother those sensitive to flicker. In terms of motion, while this flickering does reduce persistence blur, it also causes double image artifacts like seen in the photo in the Motion Blur box, which makes motion look less clear.
While this TV does have a black frame insertion setting (called 'LED Clear Motion'), all it does is reduce the TV's brightness so flickering is always present, so it's useless. The TV's 120 Hz PWM backlight does help somewhat to make motion clearer, but not nearly as well as a TV that can flicker at 60 Hz, like the Sony X720E.
The TV has a 60 Hz panel and can interpolate lower frame rate content up to its native 60 fps. However, because it doesn't have a 120 Hz panel it can't interpolate 60 fps content up any higher, but this is expected of a budget TV.
This TV is great at displaying videos without stutter, even for low frame rate content such as movies. This is due to the response time, which smoothes the transition between frames.
Similarly to the M5300, the M4500 cannot remove judder from 24p movies playing from 24p, 60p and 60i sources. This means that 24p movies, playing from any sources, will always display some judder. This is not a problem for everybody, as it is not everyone that is sensitive to judder. If you have watched movies on a mobile device before and did not notice any judder, you should be okay with the Samsung M4500.
Like most 2017 TVs, the M4500 doesn't support a variable refresh rate.
Decent input lag, good enough for casual gaming but it may be disappointing for more serious gamers. Strangely the input lag in 'Game' mode (63.3 ms) was higher than out of game mode when motion interpolation was off (46.7 ms), so we recommend using 'Movie' mode with all processing disabled to get the best input lag. PC mode had the same input lag as out of game mode. This 'Game' mode bug was also seen with the Samsung M5300. Overall, the input lag is significantly worse than many competing TVs like the TCL D100 and S305, and the LG LJ5500.
Because the TV only has a 1366x768 pixel panel, it can't show 1080p or 4k content at full resolution. In PC mode the TV can show 1366x768 with 4:4:4 color properly, which is good, but sometimes it gets stuck in a state where it won't show 4:4:4 color properly and requires a hard plug pull to be corrected. PC mode is activated by setting the input's icon to 'PC'. 1360x768 is listed as the TV's native resolution but 1366x768 is the true resolution of the panel, so we recommend using 1366x768 whenever possible.
For 5.1 passthrough only one of Dolby Digital or DTS can be enabled at a time, so you must manually switch between them depending on what your source supports.
Bad frequency response. The M4500's very small speakers are incapable of reproducing bass frequencies properly, leading it to sound quite thin. Combined with its relatively low volume and subdued treble, it makes for very unsatisfactory audio reproduction.