Sony X900F  TV Review

Reviewed Mar 16, 2018 at 07:46pm
Test bench update May 11, 2020 at 08:58am
Tested using Methodology v1.5 
Sony X900F
7.9
Mixed Usage 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

8.3
Movies 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

7.9
TV Shows 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

7.8
Sports 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

7.6
Video Games 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

8.2
HDR Movies 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

7.6
HDR Gaming 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

7.5
PC Monitor 
Value for price beaten by

Not at the latest test bench

 1
 TV Settings
Notice: This TVs was replaced by Sony X900H
The Sony X900F is a great 4k TV with impressive picture quality, especially in a dark room due to the high native contrast ratio and full array local dimming support. The TV excels at HDR as it can produce bright, vivid highlights. Motion handling is also excellent due to the fast response time and ability to flicker the backlight to clear up motion. The main negative is the narrow viewing angle, so the best image quality is reserved for those directly in front of the TV.

Our Verdict

7.9
Mixed Usage 

The Sony X900F is a great TV for a range of usages. High contrast ratio and local dimming results in great dark scene performance for watching movies in a dark room. Input lag is low, especially at 4k, and motion handling is excellent which is great for gaming. The TV can produce bright, saturated highlights for HDR. Unfortunately, the image degrades when viewed at an angle.

Pros
  • Deep and uniform blacks.
  • Excellent motion handling.
  • Bright HDR highlights.
Cons
  • Picture quality degrades at an angle.
8.3
Movies 

Great movie performance for the X900F. Blacks are deep and uniform, with local dimming to improve dark scenes. The picture quality is great and colors are accurate out-of-the-box. 24p movies are displayed smoothly, which is good.

7.9
TV Shows 

Great for watching TV in a bright room. The image on the XBR55X900F gets bright which helps to overcome ambient glare, and the reflection handling is impressive. Picture quality is also great. Unfortunately, the Android smart platform isn't as good as the competition and the image degrades when viewed at an angle.

7.8
Sports 

Good TV for watching sports. The Sony X900F has a fantastic response time, so fast-moving objects will have little motion trail behind them. It can get very bright and it handles reflections well to combat glare in bright rooms. Unfortunately, this isn't a good choice if you're planning on watching the game with a large group of people since its viewing angles are poor. However, its gray uniformity is good with no visible dirty screen effect, which can be distracting when watching sports.

7.6
Video Games 

The Sony X900F is excellent for playing video games. The input lag is good enough for gaming, but unfortunately, it doesn't support any variable refresh rate (VRR) technology. If you game in dark rooms, it has a great contrast ratio and good black uniformity. For people who game with older consoles, this 4k TV displays 720p and 1080p content well.

8.2
HDR Movies 

HDR movies look great. The Sony X900F supports HDR10 and Dolby Vision. The picture quality is great, with a high native contrast ratio and good uniformity, and the TV can create bright, vivid highlights for HDR.

7.6
HDR Gaming 

Great for gaming in HDR, such as with the Xbox One X or PS4 Pro. Input lag is low at 4k, and motion handling is excellent so fast-paced games feel responsive. The X900F supports HDR10 and can produce bright, saturated highlights thanks to the high peak brightness and wide color gamut.

7.5
PC Monitor 

Great TV for PC use. The X900F feels responsive thanks to low input lag and excellent motion handling. It supports chroma 4:4:4 for clear text across all backgrounds but unfortunately, the viewing angle is poor, so the edges of the screen darken when viewed from up-close.

  • 7.9
    Mixed Usage
  • 8.3
    Movies
  • 7.9
    TV Shows
  • 7.8
    Sports
  • 7.6
    Video Games
  • 8.2
    HDR Movies
  • 7.6
    HDR Gaming
  • 7.5
    PC Monitor
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated May 21, 2020: Converted to Test Bench 1.5.
    2.  Updated Feb 21, 2020: Converted to Test Bench 1.4.
    3.  Updated Apr 09, 2019: An app update has added ads to the home screen. We have updated the ad-free box.
    4.  Updated Feb 28, 2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.

    Check Price

    49"XBR49X900F
    SEE PRICE
    Amazon.com
    55"XBR55X900F
    Amazon.com
    65"XBR65X900F
    Amazon.com
    75"XBR75X900F
    SEE PRICE
    Amazon.com
    85"XBR85X900F
    Amazon.com

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the 55" (XBR55X900F). For the most part, we expect our review to be valid for the 49" (XBR49X900F), 65" (XBR65X900F), 75" (XBR75X900F) and 85" (XBR85X900F).

    Depending on where you are, the X900F is also known as the XF90, X90F, or X9000F. Although we haven't tested them, we don't expect any significant differences between them other than minor regional differences, including different tuners.

    If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their Sony X900F doesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we will update the review. Note that some tests such as the gray uniformity may vary between individual units.

    Size US Model Alternative Name EU Model VESA Mount Size
    49" XBR49X900F XBR-49X900F KD-49XF9005 200x200
    55" XBR55X900F XBR-55X900F KD-55XF9005 300x300
    65" XBR65X900F XBR-65X900F KD-65XF9005 300x300
    75" XBR75X900F XBR-75X900F KD-75XF9005 400x300
    85" XBR85X900F XBR-85X900F - 400x400

    Popular TV Comparisons

    Comparison picture

    Top left: Sony X900E (XBR55X900E). Bottom left: Samsung Q8C (QN55Q8C). Middle: Sony X900F (XBR55X900F). Top right: Sony X930E (XBR55X930E). Bottom right: LG B7A (OLED55B7A).

    The Sony X900F is a solid performer across the board. It can produce deep blacks aided by local dimming for watching movies in a dark room, has excellent motion handling for sports or fast-paced games, and can produce bright, saturated highlights for HDR. Having said that, it faces tough competition in the price bracket - especially from the Sony X900E. See our recommendations for the best smart TVs.

    Sony X900E
    49" 55" 65" 75"

    The 2018 Sony X900F is marginally better than the 2017 Sony X900E. The X900F has a better response time, so fast-moving objects have very little motion blur that isn't noticeable to most people. The X900F also received an update that enables Dolby Vision support with the native apps and some external devices.

    Sony X800E
    43" 49" 55"

    These are two different types of TVs. If you have a room with a wide seating arrangement, then Sony X800E might be the better choice as the image remains accurate when viewed from the side. In all other situations, however, the Sony X900F seems to be the better choice. The X900F has much better dark room performance, can get much brighter both in SDR and in HDR, has a faster response time, and the image is crisp with minimal motion blur trail behind fast-moving objects. The X900F can also remove 24p judder from any source.

    Samsung Q90/Q90R QLED
    65" 75" 82"

    The Samsung Q90/Q90R QLED is better than the Sony X900F. The Samsung Q90R has slightly better dark room performance thanks to its more efficient local dimming support and better black uniformity. The Samsung Q90R also has the 'Ultra Viewing Angle' technology, which maintains an accurate image for wider viewing angles. Finally, the Samsung Q90R is packed with gaming features like FreeSync variable refresh rate support to please gamers.

    Sony X950H
    49" 55" 65" 75" 85"

    For most uses, the Sony X950H performs better than the Sony X900F. The X950H has a better local dimming feature, wider viewing angles, and a better reflection handling. Input lag is much lower on the X950H, but the X900F has a higher contrast ratio and a faster response time.

    Show more 

    Video

    How We Test TVs

    We buy and test dozens of TVs yearly, taking an objective, data-driven approach to deliver results you can trust. Our testing process is complex, with hundreds of individual tests that take over a week to complete. Most of our tests are done with specially designed test patterns that mimic real content, but we also use the same sources you have at home to ensure our results match the real-world experience. We use two main tools for our testing: a Colorimetry Research CR-100 colorimeter and a CR-250 spectroradiometer.

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    8.5
    Style
    CurvedNo

    The Sony X900F's design is great. It's quite different from traditional Sony aesthetics. The wide-set legs are the most noticeable difference, and they do require a larger table, but are designed so that the Sony soundbar can fit between them. There's basic cable management similar to the X900E down the back of the stand, but it isn't as good as the X930E which includes routing through the back panel. The build quality is very good and the TV feels solid.

    Stand

    The stand supports the TV well and feels secure. It's wide enough to place a soundbar between the two feet. There's also space at the back of the legs for cable management, which most people will enjoy.

    Footprint of the 55" TV stand: 39.2" x 10.6"

    Back
    Wall MountVESA 300x300

    The back of the XBR55X900F has a simple design with two sets of inputs. One is directly on the back, pointing downwards, so it can be difficult to reach if the TV is wall-mounted. The other set of inputs is on the side and should be easy to access no matter where you place the TV.

    Borders
    Borders0.35" (0.9 cm)

    The borders of the TV are quite thin and look good. They look almost identical to other Sony TVs.

    Thickness
    Max Thickness2.76" (7.0 cm)

    This TV is reasonably thick. It will stick out from the wall a bit more than the Sony X850F, which has more of a uniform thickness. However, this shouldn't be too much of a problem.

    7.5
    Build Quality

    The build quality of the X900F is good, and although the TV is almost entirely plastic, it does feel well-constructed and solid.

    Picture Quality
    8.9
    Contrast
    Native Contrast
    5,089 : 1
    Contrast with local dimming
    5,725 : 1

    As is the case with most VA panels, the Sony Bravia X900F has an excellent contrast ratio. It can display deep blacks when viewed in a dark room, so this TV is a good choice for watching movies with dark scenes. If you're looking for an OLED with a perfect contrast ratio, check out the LG B8 OLED.

    With the local dimming feature enabled, the contrast ratio slightly increases, but the dimming zones aren't big enough to have an impact on this pattern.

    7.0
    Local Dimming
    Local Dimming
    Yes
    Backlight
    Full-Array

    The full array local dimming of the 2018 Sony X900F is decent and better than most LED TVs. It's a small upgrade when compared to the 2017 X900E. The X900F performance is more similar to the 2017 Sony X930E when set side by side, although the X930E has slightly less abrupt transitions of the zones on movements.

    Very similar performance to the Samsung Q8FN. The X900F has deeper black levels, but there is more visible blooming.

    When set to 'High', the feature is very good at limiting blooming and keeping a good overall black level, but on some occasions, it may be a bit too aggressive as small highlights can get dimmed on fast movements. Therefore, if you notice this behavior, you can set it the 'Medium', and it should behave more conservatively.

    8.6
    SDR Peak Brightness
    SDR Real Scene Peak Brightness
    578 cd/m²
    SDR Peak 2% Window
    781 cd/m²
    SDR Peak 10% Window
    962 cd/m²
    SDR Peak 25% Window
    781 cd/m²
    SDR Peak 50% Window
    581 cd/m²
    SDR Peak 100% Window
    641 cd/m²
    SDR Sustained 2% Window
    700 cd/m²
    SDR Sustained 10% Window
    943 cd/m²
    SDR Sustained 25% Window
    776 cd/m²
    SDR Sustained 50% Window
    577 cd/m²
    SDR Sustained 100% Window
    638 cd/m²
    SDR ABL
    0.026

    Great SDR peak brightness, good enough for even a bright room. The TV's local dimming does a good job of boosting bright sections of the screen when other sections are dimmer, shown by how the smaller window tests are brighter than the larger ones. Overall, this brightness is a marked improvement over the 2017 X900E, and is far better than the brightness of many competing TVs like the Samsung MU8000 and LG SJ8500, though still not as bright as the X930E.

    8.4
    HDR Peak Brightness
    HDR Real Scene Peak Brightness
    894 cd/m²
    HDR Peak 2% Window
    829 cd/m²
    HDR Peak 10% Window
    988 cd/m²
    HDR Peak 25% Window
    764 cd/m²
    HDR Peak 50% Window
    648 cd/m²
    HDR Peak 100% Window
    653 cd/m²
    HDR Sustained 2% Window
    788 cd/m²
    HDR Sustained 10% Window
    974 cd/m²
    HDR Sustained 25% Window
    761 cd/m²
    HDR Sustained 50% Window
    645 cd/m²
    HDR Sustained 100% Window
    651 cd/m²
    HDR ABL
    0.023

    Update 04/18/2019: There are some brightness issues playing Dolby Vision content from an external source on the X950G and X900F. Find out more here.

    Great HDR peak brightness; bright highlights in HDR content will be shown fairly bright, though not quite as bright as the 1000-4000 cd/m² they're intended to be. The TV's local dimming can boost highlights to be very bright because the rest of the scene in HDR content is usually fairly dim when compared to SDR content, so the TV has more power budget for the highlights.

    7.5
    Gray Uniformity
    50% Std. Dev.
    4.335%
    50% DSE
    0.165%
    5% Std. Dev.
    0.812%
    5% DSE
    0.103%

    Good gray uniformity on this TV. There are some uniformity issues at the corners, but none at the center, so the dirty screen effect (DSE) should be minimal. This is important for people who watch sports, where the DSE is most noticeable.

    5.2
    Viewing Angle
    Color Washout
    24°
    Color Shift
    19°
    Brightness Loss
    40°
    Black Level Raise
    14°
    Gamma Shift
    14°

    Like with most VA panels, the Sony Bravia X900F has poor viewing angles. People will notice a drop in picture quality when viewing from the side, so this isn't a good choice for rooms with wide seating arrangements.

    7.7
    Black Uniformity
    Native Std. Dev.
    0.923%
    Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
    1.056%

    Good black uniformity. There's some blooming around the center cross and very little backlight bleed around the edges in the native black uniformity picture. However, with the local dimming feature enabled, the screen looks more uniform, and there's no backlight bleeding anymore. Dark scenes will look good in dark rooms.

    8.3
    Reflections
    Screen Finish
    Semi-gloss
    Total Reflections
    3.5%
    Indirect Reflections
    0.4%
    Calculated Direct Reflections
    3.1%

    Great reflection handling on the XBR55X900F. It has a semi-gloss finish which slightly diffuses light. Like 2017's Sony X900E, this TV has an anti-reflecting coating to help reduce the total number of reflections, which should work well in most rooms. However, it might be distracting if it's placed in a room with direct sunlight on it.

    8.8
    Pre Calibration
    White Balance dE
    1.66
    Color dE
    1.60
    Gamma
    2.20
    Color Temperature
    6,537 K
    Picture Mode
    Custom
    Color Temp Setting
    Expert 1
    Gamma Setting
    0

    Out of the box, the accuracy of the X900F is excellent, and for most people, this TV could be used right away without the need for any calibration.

    The most accurate picture mode out of the box is the 'Custom' picture mode, and it's also one of the picture modes that gives you the most control over all the picture setting available.

    The 'Cinema Pro' is also very accurate, but this picture mode targets a gamma closer to 2.4, rather than our desired 2.2 target.

    9.5
    Post Calibration
    White Balance dE
    0.13
    Color dE
    1.33
    Gamma
    2.19
    Color Temperature
    6,495 K
    White Balance Calibration
    10 point
    Color Calibration
    No
    Auto-Calibration Function
    No

    The accuracy is outstanding after calibrating the white balance. Unfortunately, the lack of color management system on Sony's TVs can't be corrected further.

    Overall, the calibration here did only bring some small corrections, as the TV was already very accurate out of the box, and the process was very fast and without issues.

    You can see our recommended settings here.

    8.0
    480p Input

    Upscaling of low-quality 480p content such as DVDs is good. Some halo artifacting is visible along edges, but there is a good range of options to customize the upscaling depending on preferences.

    8.0
    720p Input

    720p content such as cable is upscaled well. Edges are smoothed to reduce blockiness, and some haloing artifacts are visible.

    9.0
    1080p Input

    1080p sources such as Blu-rays look great once upscaled.

    10
    4k Input

    Native 4k content such as UHD Blu-rays or high-quality streaming content is displayed without any issues.

    0.0
    8k Input
    Pixels
    TypeLED
    Sub-Type
    VA

    The pixels on the X900F look almost identical to the X900E as seen here, however, there is a small notch at the bottom of each sub-pixel.

    8.0
    Color Gamut
    Wide Color Gamut
    Yes
    DCI P3 xy
    88.01%
    DCI P3 uv
    93.93%
    Rec 2020 xy
    64.78%
    Rec 2020 uv
    72.51%

    Great wide color gamut; saturated colors in HDR content will be shown fairly well, but not quite as well as some other TVs like the LG B7 OLED. The TV's color accuracy for less saturated colors is also fairly good, so the overall HDR image will be accurate.

    The TV's HDR EOTF follows the target PQ curve very closely up until it rolls off and clips at its peak brightness. The EOTFs in the 'Game' and 'Graphics' picture modes also follow the target closely. Users who want a brighter HDR image can increase the TV's 'Gamma' and 'Adv. contrast enhancer' settings, which will raise the EOTF to be brighter than the target curve.

    Update 05/02/2018: The color gamut was erroneously measured at a 50% stimulus. It has been remeasured at 75% stimulus to be in line with our other TVs. The results remain almost identical.

    7.1
    Color Volume
    Normalized DCI P3 Coverage ITP
    78.8%
    10,000 cd/m² DCI P3 Coverage ITP
    45.4%
    Normalized Rec 2020 Coverage ITP
    62.4%
    10,000 cd/m² Rec 2020 Coverage ITP
    36.0%

    Decent color volume in HDR. The Sony X900F's local dimming does a good job of extending its wide color gamut down to a range of different brightness, so darker colors will look as saturated as brighter colors.

    9.0
    Gradient
    Color Depth
    10 Bit
    Red (Std. Dev.)
    0.092
    Green (Std. Dev.)
    0.083
    Blue (Std. Dev.)
    0.083
    Gray (Std. Dev.)
    0.057

    Great gradient performance on the X900F. There's no visible banding when playing 10-bit content, such as HDR. There's some visible banding in 8-bit SDR, but this can be reduced with the 'Smooth Gradation' setting enabled.

    10
    Temporary Image Retention
    IR after 0 min recovery
    0.00%
    IR after 2 min recovery
    0.00%
    IR after 4 min recovery
    0.00%
    IR after 6 min recovery
    0.00%
    IR after 8 min recovery
    0.00%
    IR after 10 min recovery
    0.00%

    No temporary image retention on this TV. This is great if you're planning on using it as a PC monitor.

    10
    Permanent Burn-In Risk
    Permanent Burn-In Risk
    No

    We don't expect VA panels to experience permanent image retention, as the VA panel in our long-term test appears immune.

    Motion
    8.6
    Response Time
    80% Response Time
    3.1 ms
    100% Response Time
    10.2 ms

    Amazing response time on the X900F, so fast-moving content will have little blur trail behind them. It has a better response time than the Sony X850F.

    9.5
    Flicker-Free
    Flicker-Free
    No
    PWM Dimming Frequency
    720 Hz

    There's a backlight flicker on this TV, but at 720Hz, it's almost unnoticeable for most people. If you're looking for a flicker-free Sony TV, check out the Sony X850F.

    6.0
    Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
    Optional BFI
    Yes
    Min Flicker for 60 fps
    120 Hz
    60 Hz for 60 fps
    No
    120 Hz for 120 fps
    Yes
    Min Flicker for 60 fps in Game Mode
    120 Hz

    The 2018 Sony X900F can flicker its backlight at 120Hz, which makes motion look clearer by reducing persistence blur. Unfortunately, it can't flicker at 60Hz, so 60Hz content will have visible duplications in its motion, but some may find it preferable to no flicker. On Sony TVs, BFI is activated by setting "Motionflow" to "Custom" and increasing the "Clearness" slider.

    Sony has implemented a new BFI mode on "Clearness = 1", which they call "X-Motion Clarity". When in this mode the real scene brightness decreases by about 60 nits compared to with no flicker("Clearness = 0"), but as the brightness of the screen decreases its flicker becomes more severe, similar to how a TV with PWM dimming behaves. When this is combined with local dimming, dimmer zones of the screen will have clearer motion than brighter zones. This is different from the flicker behavior in "Clearness = 2" and Max, where zones of different brightness will have similar flicker and motion clarity. We recommend "Clearness = 1" when users want clearer motion but don't want to sacrifice too much screen brightness. Note that none of these 'Clearness' settings affect the input lag in the 'Game' picture mode.

    Motion Interpolation
    Motion Interpolation (30 fps)
    Yes
    Motion Interpolation (60 fps)
    Yes

    The TV has a 120Hz panel, and its processing can interpolate lower frame rate content to 120fps to match the panel. This optional feature is also called the "soap opera effect". It produces smoother-looking motion but can look unnatural to some people, and also adds small artifacts in its processing that can be a problem to some.

    6.8
    Stutter
    Frame Hold Time @ 24 fps
    31.5 ms
    Frame Hold Time @ 60 fps
    6.5 ms

    The TV is decent at showing low frame rate content smoothly (like movies and 30fps video games), but the TV's fast pixel response time can make motion look a little stuttery, especially in wide panning scenes, because the frame stays static for 31ms. 60fps content looks smoother because the frames are on screen for a shorter amount of time.

    10
    24p Judder
    Judder-Free 24p
    Yes
    Judder-Free 24p via 60p
    Yes
    Judder-Free 24p via 60i
    Yes
    Judder-Free 24p via Native Apps
    Yes

    The Sony X900F can display 24p movies without judder no matter which sources they're playing from. To achieve this for every source including the native Netflix app, you need to set (from the Motion tab in the picture setting) the 'Motionflow' to 'True Cinema' and set 'CineMotion' to 'High'. This isn't needed for direct 24p sources.

    0.0
    Variable Refresh Rate
    Native Refresh Rate
    120 Hz
    Variable Refresh Rate
    No
    HDMI Forum VRR
    No
    FreeSync
    No
    G-SYNC Compatible
    No
    4k VRR Maximum
    N/A
    4k VRR Minimum
    No VRR support
    1080p VRR Maximum
    N/A
    1080p VRR Minimum
    No VRR support
    1440p VRR Maximum
    N/A
    1440p VRR Minimum
    N/A
    VRR Supported Connectors
    No VRR support

    The TV doesn't support a variable refresh rate. If you need a TV that supports variable refresh rate technology, check out the Samsung Q70T.

    Inputs
    7.0
    Input Lag
    1080p @ 60 Hz
    40.9 ms
    1080p @ 60 Hz Outside Game Mode
    103.5 ms
    1440p @ 60 Hz
    23.4 ms
    4k @ 60 Hz
    24.2 ms
    4k @ 60 Hz + 10 bit HDR
    24.2 ms
    4k @ 60 Hz @ 4:4:4
    24.1 ms
    4k @ 60 Hz Outside Game Mode
    86.9 ms
    4k @ 60 Hz With Interpolation
    80.9 ms
    8k @ 60 Hz
    N/A
    1080p @ 120 Hz
    12.9 ms
    1440p @ 120 Hz
    13.3 ms
    4k @ 120 Hz
    N/A
    1080p with Variable Refresh Rate
    N/A
    1440p with VRR
    N/A
    4k with VRR
    N/A
    8k with VRR
    N/A
    Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM)
    No

    Update 05/08/2019: We retested the 1080p input lag in and out of game mode with the latest firmware PKG6.5830.0205NAA and it remains the same.

    Great low input lag, especially when playing 4k video. The 1080p input lag is higher than for 4k but is still good enough for most gaming. Overall, the input lag is very similar to the X930E, which is understandable because both use Sony's 'X1 Extreme' processing engine. However, many TVs from other brands have lower input lag, such as the Samsung MU8000, LG SJ8500, and TCL P607.

    If you need lower input lag for gaming or for PC use, check out the Sony X900H, which is the successor of this TV.

    9.6
    Supported Resolutions
    Resolution4k
    1080p @ 60 Hz @ 4:4:4
    Yes
    1080p @ 120 Hz
    Yes (forced resolution required)
    1440p @ 60 Hz
    Yes (forced resolution required)
    1440p @ 120 Hz
    Yes (forced resolution required)
    4k @ 60 Hz
    Yes
    4k @ 60 Hz @ 4:4:4
    Yes
    4k @ 120 Hz
    No
    8k @ 30 Hz or 24 Hz
    No
    8k @ 60 Hz
    No

    All common resolutions are supported. 4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4 or 4:2:2 is only possible on HDMI inputs 2 and 3, and only when 'HDMI Enhanced Format' is enabled. 4:4:4 chroma subsampling is only shown properly in the 'Game' and 'Graphics' picture modes.

    Update 06/11/2018: A note for Xbox One X and Xbox One S owners: 120Hz from the Xbox won't work with this TV (and all 2017-2018 Sony's we've tested), because the TV requires a forced resolution for 120 Hz to be displayed.

    Update 06/12/2018: It turns out 1080p @ 120Hz is possible, when the Xbox's connection type is changed from Auto-detect (Recommended) to HDMI: (Xbox > Settings > Display & sound > Video fidelity & overscan > Display > Connection > HDMI). Unfortunately in this mode 4k, HDR, 50 Hz and 24 Hz aren't possible, so this mode is only recommended when the higher refresh rate of 120 Hz is more important to you than these other features. Find out more here.

    Update 06/18/2018: Correction, 24Hz and 50Hz are in fact possible with the Xbox's connection type set to HDMI.

    Input Photos
    Total Inputs
    HDMI4
    USB3
    Digital Optical Audio Out1
    Analog Audio Out 3.5mm1
    Analog Audio Out RCA0
    Component In0
    Composite In1 (adapter required, not incl.)
    Tuner (Cable/Ant)1
    Ethernet1
    DisplayPort0
    IR In1
    SD/SDHC0

    There is one composite input (labeled 'Video In'); however, it's a 3.5mm jack, and requires an adapter for most devices. An example of the correct adapter can be found here.

    Inputs Specifications
    HDR10
    Yes
    HDR10+
    No
    Dolby Vision
    Yes
    HLG
    Yes
    3D
    No
    HDMI 2.0 Full Bandwidth
    Yes (HDMI 2,3)
    HDMI 2.1
    No
    CECYes
    HDCP 2.2Yes (HDMI 1,2,3,4)
    USB 3.0
    Yes (1)
    Variable Analog Audio OutYes
    Wi-Fi SupportYes (2.4 GHz, 5 GHz)

    Update 06/11/2018: Dolby Vision support has been added as of firmware (PKG6.5603.0175NAA); the scores have been updated.

    Audio Passthrough
    ARC
    Yes (HDMI 3)
    eARC support
    No
    Dolby Atmos via TrueHD via eARC
    No
    DTS:X via DTS-HD MA via eARC
    No
    5.1 Dolby Digital via ARC
    Yes
    5.1 DTS via ARC
    Yes
    5.1 Dolby Digital via Optical
    Yes
    5.1 DTS via Optical
    Yes
    Sound Quality
    6.5
    Frequency Response
    See details on graph tool
    Low-Frequency Extension
    95.14 Hz
    Std. Dev. @ 70
    4.01 dB
    Std. Dev. @ 80
    4.40 dB
    Std. Dev. @ Max
    6.81 dB
    Max
    90.0 dB SPL
    Dynamic Range Compression
    4.25 dB

    Average frequency response. It has relatively deep bass, but not deep enough to produce deep rumbles (i.e. explosion sound effects). The frequency response is quite flat and well-balanced, however, the TV wasn't able to remove the resonances of the test room (high-bass and low-mid) due to a lack of self-calibrating system. Additionally, the TV does get pretty loud, but they could produce some pumping and compression artifacts near their maximum volume.

    5.1
    Distortion
    See details on graph tool
    Weighted THD @ 80
    0.117
    Weighted THD @ Max
    9.787
    IMD @ 80
    16.81%
    IMD @ Max
    72.21%

    Sub-par harmonic distortion performance. Similar to other Sony TVs we have measured, this TV has little distortion at low volumes. However, at maximum volume, the X900F produces a lot of distortion, but this kind of distortion won't be very audible with real-life content (movies, music).

    Smart Features
    7.0
    Interface
    Smart OSAndroid TV
    Version7.0
    Ease of Use
    Average
    Smoothness
    Not Smooth
    Time Taken to Select YouTube
    3 s
    Time Taken to Change Backlight
    6 s
    Advanced Options
    Many

    The Android TV interface isn't as easy to use as some other smart platforms. The home screen is very long, requiring a lot of scrolling to see everything. The performance is also quite inconsistent; sometimes the TV will open menus quickly and have smooth animations, but other times menus will lag for a second or two before opening, and their animations will be choppy. The home menu is especially slow to open, which is unfortunate because of how often it needs to be used. This is alleviated somewhat by the many buttons on the Sony remote and the voice control feature.

    0.0
    Ad-Free
    Ads
    Yes
    Opt-out
    No
    Suggested Content in Home
    Yes
    Opt-out of Suggested Content
    Yes

    Update 04/09/2019: Google has pushed an update to some Sony TVs that run the Android Oreo update. This update adds a row of Google Sponsored Content in the second row of the home page. Unlike the existing sponsored content, this row cannot be remove normally from the Customize Channels menu menu. There is a workaround though, which is available here.

    The ads look similar to the ones seen on the Sony X950G.

    9.0
    Apps and Features
    App Selection
    Great
    App Smoothness
    Average
    Cast Capable
    Yes
    USB Drive Playback
    Yes
    USB Drive HDR Playback
    Yes
    HDR in Netflix
    Yes
    HDR in YouTube
    Yes

    One of Android TV's strengths is access to the Google Play Store, which has more apps than almost all other smart platforms. The apps run fairly smoothly and with minimal lag, unlike the frequent mini-hangs of the main Android interface.

    Update 01/09/2019: YouTube app version 2.04.05 has added HDR support, separate from the Android Oreo update.

    Correction 02/22/2019: The YouTube app does support HDR, but it is currently bugged. The brightness and color gamut do not switch automatically, and there are issues playing files with a resolution higher than 1080p.

    8.0
    Remote
    Size
    Large
    Voice Control
    Many Features
    CEC Menu Control
    Yes
    Other Smart Features
    No
    Remote AppAndroid TV

    The X900F comes with Sony's lower-cost remote with rubber chunk buttons, unlike the better remote that came with the X900E. The remote is still very usable, and has more buttons than most remotes, at the cost of being larger than most remotes.

    The remote can connect to the TV by Bluetooth so that its microphone can be used with the TV's Google Assistant voice control feature. Google Assistant can perform a lot of actions on the TV, as well as interface with the rest of the Google ecosystem; commands like 'open YouTube', 'switch to HDMI 3', 'pause video', 'how's the weather', and 'turn off the TV' all work well, though commands to change picture settings like 'set the brightness to 20' and 'switch to Game mode' don't work.

    TV Controls

    Like most Sony TVs, the only buttons on the TV are three small buttons on the back edge. This simple three-button system can be used to change inputs, speaker volume, and tuner channel, as well as act as the TV's power button.

    In The Box

    • Manual
    • IR Blaster
    • Remote
    • Batteries
    Misc
    Power Consumption64 W
    Power Consumption (Max)174 W
    FirmwarePKG6.5160.0144NAA

    Update 11/15/2018: The maximum power consumption was incorrectly listed as 108 watts; this was a mistake that has been corrected.