The Gigabyte G27QC is a great budget gaming monitor. It shares many similarities with its bigger sibling, the Gigabyte G32QC, as it also features a VA panel with a 1440p resolution and a 165Hz refresh rate. It handles reflections well and gets bright enough to provide good visibility in well-lit environments. It also performs well in dark rooms thanks to its high contrast ratio. It has a fast response time to deliver clear motion in fast-moving scenes, and variable refresh rate support to reduce screen tearing. Sadly, it has narrow viewing angles and poor ergonomics, which isn't ideal if you want to share work, content, or play co-op games. Also, it doesn't get very bright in HDR, so HDR content doesn't look much different than in SDR.
Our Verdict
The Gigabyte G27QC is a good monitor for most uses. It delivers great gaming performance with its low input lag, fast response time, and 165Hz refresh rate. Its large screen and high resolution are also well-suited for productivity; however, it has narrow viewing angles and poor ergonomics, making it difficult to place it at your optimal viewing position or for sharing work. Unfortunately, even though it supports HDR, it can't get bright enough to deliver a satisfying HDR experience.
- Great contrast ratio.
- Great resolution and size.
- Good reflection handling.
- Sub-par viewing angles.
- Poor ergonomics.
The Gigabyte G27QC is decent for office use. It has a high resolution to render text clearly, and its 27 inch screen provides plenty of space for multitasking. However, its poor ergonomics and narrow viewing angles make it harder to share work or content. On the upside, it has good reflection handling, and the backlight is flicker-free.
- Great resolution and size.
- Good reflection handling.
- Excellent gray uniformity.
- Sub-par viewing angles.
- Poor ergonomics.
- Bad black uniformity.
The Gigabyte G27QC is great for gaming. It has low input lag, quick response time, and a 165Hz refresh rate to provide a smooth and responsive gaming experience. It supports FreeSync to reduce screen tearing and is also G-SYNC compatible. Unfortunately, it isn't ideal for co-op gaming due to its narrow viewing angles and poor ergonomics. Its high contrast ratio makes it a good choice for dark rooms; however, backlight bleed can be an issue.
- High refresh rate.
- Fast response time.
- Great resolution and size.
- Good reflection handling.
- Poor ergonomics.
- Bad black uniformity.
The Gigabyte G27QC is good for media consumption. It has a large high-resolution screen that delivers good picture quality. It handles reflections well in bright rooms, and its high contrast ratio is great for dark room viewing. Sadly, its narrow viewing angles and poor ergonomics make it less ideal for sharing content.
- Great contrast ratio.
- Great resolution and size.
- Good reflection handling.
- Excellent gray uniformity.
- Sub-par viewing angles.
- Poor ergonomics.
- Bad black uniformity.
The Gigabyte G27QC is good for content creation. Its large screen allows you to work with multiple windows opened side-by-side, and its 1440p resolution lets you see all the fine details in your work. It has an excellent SDR color gamut and good color accuracy out-of-the-box. Sharing work or content is a bit more challenging due to its poor ergonomics and narrow viewing angles.
- Great contrast ratio.
- Great resolution and size.
- Good reflection handling.
- Excellent gray uniformity.
- Sub-par viewing angles.
- Poor ergonomics.
- Bad black uniformity.
The Gigabyte G27QC is decent for gaming in HDR. It delivers a smooth gaming experience with its high refresh rate and quick response time, and it supports variable refresh rate to help reduce screen tearing. Unfortunately, it doesn't get bright enough in HDR to make highlights pop, and our unit has a significant amount of backlight bleed, which can be distracting.
- Great contrast ratio.
- High refresh rate.
- Fast response time.
- Great resolution and size.
- Poor ergonomics.
- Doesn't get bright enough for HDR.
- Bad black uniformity.
Changelog
- Updated Nov 15, 2022: Added in the Variants that a new model, the G27QC A, is very similar but performs differently.
- Updated Nov 26, 2020: We previously indicated that there isn't a BFI feature. It has been fixed.
- Updated Sep 23, 2020: Review published.
- Updated Sep 17, 2020: Early access published.
Check Price
Differences Between Sizes And Variants
We tested the Gigabyte G27QC 27. It's a smaller variant of the Gigabyte G32QC and one of many monitors from Gigabyte's budget gaming monitor lineup. You can see some of them in the table below. There's a new model available, the G27QC A, that has many of the same features, but the results aren't valid for it because it's a different model.
| Model | Size | Panel Type | Resolution | Refresh Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G27QC | 27" | VA | 2560 x 1440 | 165Hz |
| G32QC | 32" | VA | 2560 x 1440 | 165Hz |
| G27Q | 27" | IPS | 2560 x 1440 | 144Hz |
| G27FC | 27" | VA | 1920 x 1080 | 165Hz |
| G27F | 27" | IPS | 1920 x 1080 | 144Hz |
| G34WQC | 34" | VA | 3440 x 1440 | 144Hz |
If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their Gigabyte G27QC 27 doesn't correspond to our review, let us know in the discussions and we'll update the review. Note that some tests, such as gray uniformity, may vary between individual units.
Our unit of the Gigabyte G27QC 27 was manufactured in July 2020; you can see the label here.
Popular Monitor Comparisons
The Gigabyte G27QC 27 is a great budget gaming monitor; however, its poor ergonomics and narrow viewing angles make it less ideal for office use. There are more versatile options in the same price range, like the ASUS VG279QM.
Also, check out our recommendations for the best gaming monitor, the best budget gaming monitor, and the best 1440p gaming monitor.
The Gigabyte G27Q is better overall than the Gigabyte G27QC, but they're very similar monitors with different panel types. The G27Q has an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, it gets brighter, and it has a better SDR color gamut, making it a better choice for office use. However, the G27QC has a VA panel with a much better contrast ratio, so it's a better choice for dark room gaming, and it also has a quicker response time at 60Hz, resulting in less motion blur.
The Gigabyte G27QC and the Samsung Odyssey G55C S27CG55 have similar specs, but the Gigabyte has a few extra advantages. It has two USB-A ports, which the Samsung doesn't have, making it easier to connect devices. It also has lower input lag for a more responsive feel. Lastly, the Gigabyte offers height adjustment, making it easier to place in your ideal position.
The Gigabyte G27QC and the Samsung Odyssey G50D S27DG50 are both entry-level 1440p gaming monitors. They have different panel types, each with their own pros and cons. For example, the Gigabyte has a VA panel with a higher contrast ratio for deeper blacks in dark rooms. However, the Samsung has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles. The Samsung also gets brighter, making it the better choice to use in well-lit rooms.
Overall, the Gigabyte G27QC is a bit better than the AOC CQ27G2. The Gigabyte has a higher refresh rate, faster response time at 60Hz, and gets brighter. However, the AOC has better ergonomics and a Black Frame Insertion feature to help improve motion clarity.
We buy and test more than 30 monitors each year, all of which we purchase ourselves, without cherry-picked units or samples. We put a lot into each unbiased, straight-to-the-point review, and there's a whole process from purchasing to publishing, involving multiple teams and people. We do more than just use the monitor for a week; we use specialized, custom tools to measure various aspects and deliver objective, data-driven results. We also consider multiple factors before making any recommendations, including the monitor's cost, its performance compared to the competition, and whether it's easy to find.
Test Results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for videos & test results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for videos & test results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
