Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

Acer Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx  Monitor Review

Reviewed Mar 12, 2025 at 01:27pm
Tested using methodology v2.1 
Acer Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx
7.3
PC Gaming 
6.7
Console Gaming 
7.4
Office 
7.3
Editing 
7.5
Brightness 
7.6
Response Time 
5.6
HDR Picture 
7.5
SDR Picture 
 14

The Acer Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx is an entry-level 32-inch gaming monitor with a 1440p resolution and a 180Hz maximum refresh rate. It sits above Acer's 32-inch 1080p models, such as the Acer Nitro EDA320Q P, and competes with similar monitors, such as the 32-inch Samsung Odyssey G55C S27CG55 and the Dell S3222DGM. It supports FreeSync and G-SYNC VRR and has a backlight strobing feature to reduce persistence blur and integrated speakers. It also has a few extras designed for gamers, such as the ability to boost the brightness of darker parts of scenes, a virtual crosshair, and an overlay that displays the monitor's current refresh rate.

Our Verdict

7.3
PC Gaming 

The Acer XZ322QU is decent for PC gaming. It has a 180Hz refresh rate and FreeSync and G-SYNC VRR support for smooth motion. Fast-moving objects also look fairly crisp at higher refresh rates, though they look less crisp at lower refresh rates, and the monitor also has some smearing. It also has very low input lag for a responsive feel. However, although it displays fairly deep blacks in a dark room, its highlights don't pop in HDR, and it displays a limited range of colors, so it doesn't create a vivid, engaging gaming experience.

Pros
  • Low input lag.

  • High native contrast ratio.

  • 180Hz refresh rate.

  • Bright enough to fight most glare.

  • Fairly crisp at higher refresh rates.

Cons
  • No local dimming feature.

  • More blur and smearing at low refresh rates.

  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.

6.7
Console Gaming 

The Acer XZ322QU is okay for console gaming. It displays fairly deep blacks in a dark room and supports VRR with the Xbox Series X|S. However, it doesn't support VRR with the PS5 and PS5 Pro, and fast-moving objects are a bit blurry with both consoles. Additionally, it displays a limited range of colors and doesn't get bright enough for highlights to pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Low input lag.

  • High native contrast ratio.

  • Bright enough to fight most glare.

  • Fairly crisp at higher refresh rates.

Cons
  • No local dimming feature.

  • More blur and smearing at low refresh rates.

  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.

7.4
Office 

The Acer XZ322QU is good for office use. Its large screen is great for multitasking, and it has good text clarity. It also gets bright enough to overcome most glare and has good reflection handling. However, it has narrow viewing angles and a limited swivel range, so it's not ideal if you need to share your screen with others.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight most glare.

  • Good text clarity.

  • Good reflection handling.

Cons
  • Okay ergonomics.

  • Narrow viewing angles.

7.3
Editing 

The Acer XZ322QU is satisfactory for editing. It's extremely accurate before calibration, and its large screen ensures there's lots of room for toolbars around the content you're editing. However, most editing monitors of this size have a higher resolution, so this monitor's images and videos aren't as sharp. It also has narrow viewing angles, so it's difficult for someone next to you to accurately view your work.

Pros
  • High native contrast ratio.

  • Bright enough to fight most glare.

  • Accurate colors before calibration.

Cons
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.

  • Okay ergonomics.

  • Narrow viewing angles.

7.5
Brightness 

The Acer XZ322QU has good brightness. It's bright enough to overcome glare from any source, short of direct sunlight. However, it's not bright enough for highlights to pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight most glare.

Cons
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.

7.6
Response Time 

The Acer XZ322QU's response time is good. It's fairly crisp at its maximum refresh rate, but at 120Hz and lower, it's notably blurrier. You can also see smearing at all refresh rates.

Pros
  • Fairly crisp at higher refresh rates.

Cons
  • More blur and smearing at low refresh rates.

5.6
HDR Picture 

The Acer XZ322QU has disappointing HDR picture quality. While it has excellent contrast, it displays a limited range of colors, particularly in Rec. 2020.

Pros
  • High native contrast ratio.

Cons
  • No local dimming feature.

  • Displays limited range of colors.

7.5
SDR Picture 

The Acer Nitro XZ322QU has good SDR picture. It has excellent contrast and displays a wide range of colors in sRGB, though it has inadequate black uniformity.

Pros
  • High native contrast ratio.

  • Displays wide range of colors.

Cons
  • Inadequate black uniformity.

8.7
Color Accuracy 

The Acer XZ322QU has amazing color accuracy. Colors are quite accurate before calibration, though calibration is required for the best accuracy.

Pros
  • Accurate colors before calibration.

Cons
  • Calibration required for maximum accuracy.

  • 7.3
    PC Gaming
  • 6.7
    Console Gaming
  • 7.4
    Office
  • 7.3
    Editing

  • Performance Usages

  • 7.5
    Brightness
  • 7.6
    Response Time
  • 5.6
    HDR Picture
  • 7.5
    SDR Picture
  • 8.7
    Color Accuracy
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Jul 24, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.1. This includes new tests for Direct Reflections, Ambient Black Level Raise, and Total Reflected Light. You can see all the changes in the changelog.
    2.  Updated Mar 12, 2025: Review published.
    3.  Updated Mar 06, 2025: Early access published.
    4.  Updated Feb 19, 2025: Our testers have started testing this product.

    Check Price

    32"Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx
    SEE PRICE
    Amazon.com
    32"Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx
    SEE PRICE
    Walmart.com
    32"Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx
    B&H
    32"Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx
    BestBuy.com
    32"Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx
    Samsung.com

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the 32-inch Acer XZ322QU, which is the only size available. However, Acer has a number of very similar 32-inch models. You can see some of the differences between these models below, but this review's results are only valid for this model.

    ModelResolutionMax Refresh Rate
    XZ322QU V3bmiiphx1440p180Hz
    XZ322QU Sbmiipphx1440p165Hz
    XZ322QU S3bmiiphx1440p180Hz

    Our unit's label indicates it was manufactured in September 2024.

    Popular Monitor Comparisons

    The Acer XZ322QU V3bmiiphx is a lower mid-range 32-inch gaming monitor with a 180Hz refresh rate and a 1440p resolution. It's ideally suited to someone on a budget who wants a larger, more immersive experience than the more common 27-inch 1440p gaming monitors. It's positioned between lower-end 32-inch 1440p displays like the LG 32GN650-B/32GN63T-B, which has lower brightness and much worse motion handling than the Acer, and higher-end ones like the Samsung Odyssey G65D S32BG65D, which has much brighter highlights, better motion handling, and displays a wider range of colors than the Acer. That said, if you want a 32-inch gaming monitor and your budget is limited to the price of the Acer, it's a great option, as it has good motion handling, displays deep blacks in a dark room, and overcomes most glare in brighter environments.

    For more options, see our recommendations for the best budget and cheap gaming monitors, the best 1440p gaming monitors, and the best 32-inch monitors.

    Dell Alienware AW3225DM

    Acer Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx and the Dell Alienware AW3225DM are 32-inch 1440p curved gaming monitors. The Dell is the better monitor for gamers, as it gets considerably brighter, displays a wider range of more vivid colors, has better motion handling, and better console compatibility.

    LG 32GN650-B/32GN63T-B

    The LG 32GN650-B/32GN63T-B and the Acer Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx are 32-inch 1440p gaming monitors. The Acer is the better option for competitive gamers, as it has much better motion handling. It's also a better choice for gaming in a bright room, as it gets much brighter. However, if you're on a budget the LG can be a good option, as it's in a lower price range.

    Samsung Odyssey G65D S32BG65D

    The Samsung Odyssey G65D S32BG65D and the Acer Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx are both 32-inch 1440p gaming monitors. The Samsung is better for those looking for an immersive experience, as it gets much brighter in HDR and displays a wider range of colors. It's also better for competitive gaming, as it has better motion handling. However, the Acer could be a better choice if you frequently use VRR, as it has less VRR flicker.

    Dell S3222DGM

    The Dell S3222DGM and the Acer Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx are both 32-inch 1440p gaming monitors. The Acer is the better option if you're gaming in a bright room, as it gets much brighter. It also delivers a more engaging experience, as it displays a wider range of colors and has better gradient handling.

    Show more 

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    Style
    Curved
    Yes
    Curve Radius
    1500R

    The Acer Nitro 31.5 WQHD curved gaming monitor has an understated appearance that works well in either a gaming or office environment. The bottom of the back panel has line etchings, and at the front the bottom bezel is thicker than the other three sides.

    7.0
    Build Quality

    The build quality is decent. The materials feel good, and the monitor is sturdy. However, the stand doesn't hold the monitor firmly, as it allows a lot of wobble if someone bumps the monitor.

    6.8
    Ergonomics
    Min Height To Top Of Panel
    17.4" (44.2 cm)
    Height Adjustment
    3.9" (10.0 cm)
    Tilt Range
    -17.5° to 5°
    Rotate Portrait/Landscape
    No
    Swivel Range
    -15° to 15°
    Wall Mount
    VESA 100x100

    The ergonomics are okay. While you can make any adjustment in a horizontal position, the monitor's swivel mechanism has limited range. It also doesn't have anything to assist with cable management.

    Stand
    Base Width
    20.7" (52.5 cm)
    Base Depth
    9.9" (25.1 cm)
    Thickness (With Display)
    7.9" (20.0 cm)
    Weight (With Display)
    12.1 lbs (5.5 kg)

    Because the stand doesn't have a quick-release mount, you need to unscrew the stand to remove the display. The thickness measurement is from the edge of the monitor to the back of the stand. In the middle, it's only 6.3" (16 cm) from the front of the monitor to the back of the stand.

    Display
    Size
    32"
    Housing Width
    28.0" (71.0 cm)
    Housing Height
    16.6" (42.2 cm)
    Thickness (Without Stand)
    3.6" (9.1 cm)
    Weight (Without Stand)
    9.3 lbs (4.2 kg)
    Borders Size (Bezels)
    0.4" (1.0 cm)

    The thickness measurement is from the edges of the monitor to the back. Because the monitor is curved, the thickness in the middle is 2.0" (5.1 cm).

    Controls

    The monitor has a joystick that serves as a power button and controls the on-screen display.

    In The Box
    Power Supply
    External Brick

    • DisplayPort cable
    • HDMI cable
    • Power cable and supply
    • Documentation

    Picture Quality
    8.5
    Contrast
    Native Contrast
    4,422 : 1
    Contrast With Local Dimming
    N/A

    The contrast is excellent. You can see fairly deep blacks next to bright highlights, though the monitor doesn't have a local dimming feature to improve this performance.

    0.0
    Local Dimming
    Local Dimming
    No
    Backlight
    Edge

    Though the Acer XZ322QU doesn't have local dimming, we still film these videos so you can compare the backlight performance with a monitor that has local dimming.

    8.3
    SDR Brightness
    Real Scene
    420 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    431 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    430 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    428 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    428 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    427 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    430 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    429 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    428 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    427 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    426 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.001
    Minimum Brightness
    54 cd/m²

    Settings

    • Mode: User (after calibration)
    • Color Space: Standard
    • Brightness: Max
    • ACM: Off
    • Super Sharpness: Off

    The SDR brightness is great. It's bright enough to fight glare in most situations except for intense direct light. Its brightness also doesn't vary with different content, which is excellent.

    6.9
    HDR Brightness
    VESA DisplayHDR Certification
    DisplayHDR 400 - 1.0/1.1
    Real Scene
    421 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    430 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    430 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    430 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    430 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    430 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    429 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    430 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    430 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    430 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    430 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.000

    Settings

    • Picture Mode: HDR
    • HDR Mode: HDR-400
    • Super Sharpness: Off

    The HDR brightness is alright. While it's bright enough to overcome glare in most environments, it doesn't get bright enough for highlights to pop. That said, its PQ EOTF tracking is good, as there's a sharp cut-off at peak brightness, so highlights get as bright as possible.

    The monitor enables Super Sharpness by default when HDR is in use. However, this can cause a shimmering effect with some content, and if this bothers you, it's better to turn it off.

    Sometimes, if you change the HDR setting from 'Off' to either 'Auto' or 'HDR-400,' the monitor will apply what looks like an HDR filter over SDR content while listing it as an HDR signal. You can avoid this from happening by turning HDR off on the monitor when you're not receiving an HDR signal. The only reliable indicator of the monitor receiving an HDR signal is the brightness and color settings being locked-out.

    5.4
    Horizontal Viewing Angle
    Color Washout From Left
    29°
    Color Washout From Right
    29°
    Color Shift From Left
    32°
    Color Shift From Right
    29°
    Brightness Loss From Left
    34°
    Brightness Loss From Right
    35°
    Black Level Raise From Left
    14°
    Black Level Raise From Right
    15°
    Gamma Shift From Left
    14°
    Gamma Shift From Right
    16°

    The horizontal viewing angle is disappointing. The slightly curved screen helps reduce washout for a single viewer sitting directly in front of the monitor. However, it looks quite washed out and slightly green for anyone sitting next to you.

    5.2
    Vertical Viewing Angle
    Color Washout From Below
    27°
    Color Washout From Above
    28°
    Color Shift From Below
    30°
    Color Shift From Above
    25°
    Brightness Loss From Below
    32°
    Brightness Loss From Above
    33°
    Black Level Raise From Below
    12°
    Black Level Raise From Above
    10°
    Gamma Shift From Below
    15°
    Gamma Shift From Above
    13°

    The vertical viewing angle is poor. Whether you're looking at the monitor from above or below, the image washes out and starts to look slightly green.

    7.9
    Gray Uniformity
    50% Std. Dev.
    2.604%
    50% DSE
    0.155%

    The gray uniformity is very good. While there's a notable amount of variability close to the edges, the center of the screen is fairly uniform.

    5.8
    Black Uniformity
    Native Std. Dev.
    2.105%
    Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
    N/A

    The black uniformity is sub-par. You can clearly see backlight bleed along the edges of the screen, particularly in the corners. Additionally, this monitor doesn't have a local dimming feature to improve this performance.

    8.7
    Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
    Picture Mode
    Standard
    sRGB Gamut Area xy
    104.4%
    White Balance dE (Avg.)
    1.54
    Color Temperature (Avg.)
    6,308 K
    Gamma (Avg.)
    2.12
    Color dE (Avg.)
    2.01
    Contrast Setting
    50
    RGB Settings
    Default
    Gamma Setting
    Default
    Brightness Setting
    65
    Measured Brightness
    206 cd/m²
    Brightness Locked
    No

    The accuracy before calibration is excellent in the 'Standard' Picture Mode. The color temperature is close to the 6500K target, and the white balance is excellent. Additionally, color accuracy is great, and the gamut mostly stays within the sRGB range. However, brighter parts of scenes are too bright.

    While this monitor has an 'sRGB' Color Space mode, it performs much worse than the 'Standard' Color Space mode. As long as you're not using the 'sRGB' mode, nothing is locked out. If you do choose to use the sRGB mode the following settings are locked out:

    • Contrast
    • Low Blue Light
    • ACM
    • Black Boost
    • Gamma
    • Color Temp
    • Grayscale Mode
    • 6-axis Hue
    • 6-axis Saturate

    9.5
    Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
    Picture Mode
    User
    sRGB Gamut Area xy
    99.9%
    White Balance dE (Avg.)
    0.86
    Color Temperature (Avg.)
    6,404 K
    Gamma (Avg.)
    2.19
    Color dE (Avg.)
    1.01
    Contrast Setting
    48
    RGB Settings
    Gain (47-50-49) , Bias (50-50-50)
    Gamma Setting
    2.2
    Brightness Setting
    19
    Measured Brightness
    99 cd/m²
    ICC Profile
    Download

    The Acer XZ322QU's accuracy after calibration is outstanding, and you won't notice any inaccuracies.

    9.0
    SDR Color Gamut
    sRGB Coverage xy
    98.4%
    sRGB Picture Mode
    User
    Adobe RGB Coverage xy
    76.5%
    Adobe RGB Picture Mode
    User

    The SDR color gamut is fantastic. It covers nearly all of the commonly used sRGB color space, but it has much less coverage of Adobe RGB. Additionally, green, red, and cyan are quite inaccurate in this space.

    6.1
    HDR Color Gamut
    Wide Color Gamut
    No
    DCI-P3 Coverage xy
    76.0%
    DCI-P3 Picture Mode
    HDR
    Rec. 2020 Coverage xy
    54.5%
    Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
    HDR

    The HDR gamut is mediocre. It displays a limited range of colors in the commonly used DCI-P3 color space and an even more limited range in Rec. 2020. Additionally, a number of colors are somewhat inaccurate in both color spaces, though this is particularly true in Rec. 2020.

    6.6
    HDR Color Volume
    1,000 cd/m² DCI-P3 Coverage ICtCp
    55.5%
    DCI-P3 Picture Mode
    HDR
    10,000 cd/m² Rec. 2020 Coverage ICtCp
    23.6%
    Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
    HDR

    The HDR color volume is adequate. It doesn't display brighter colors vividly, and darker colors are a bit washed out.

    7.5
    Text Clarity
    Pixel Type
    VA
    Subpixel Layout
    RGB

    The text clarity is good. Using Windows ClearType (top photo) helps improve the boldness of letters and makes them easier to read. These photos are in Windows 10, and you can also see them in Windows 11 with ClearType on and with ClearType off.

    6.2
    Direct Reflections
    See details on graph tool
    Peak Direct Reflection Intensity
    34.9%
    Screen Finish
    Matte
    8.8
    Ambient Black Level Raise
    See details on graph tool
    Black Luminance @ 0 lx
    0.04 cd/m²
    Black Luminance @ 1000 lx
    0.54 cd/m²
    4.2
    Total Reflected Light
    Total Reflected Light Intensity
    45,735% ⋅ pixel
    Diffraction Artifacts
    No
    9.7
    Gradient
    Color Depth
    10 Bit

    The gradient handling is fantastic. There's minimal banding between shades of similar colors.

    Motion
    7.7
    Refresh Rate
    Native Refresh Rate
    180 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate
    180 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over DP
    180 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
    144 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over DP @ 10-bit
    120 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI @ 10-Bit
    60 Hz
    DSC Toggle
    No
    DSC Off Max Refresh Rate Over DP
    N/A
    DSC Off Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
    N/A
    Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
    Variable Refresh Rate
    Yes
    FreeSync
    Yes
    G-SYNC
    Compatible (Tested)
    VRR Maximum
    180 Hz
    VRR Minimum
    < 20 Hz
    VRR Supported Connectors
    DisplayPort, HDMI

    NVIDIA - G-SYNC Compatibility
    ConnectionVRR MinVRR Max
    DisplayPort<20Hz180Hz
    HDMIN/AN/A
    AMD - FreeSync
    ConnectionVRR MinVRR Max
    DisplayPort<20Hz180Hz
    HDMI<20Hz144Hz

    This monitor supports FreeSync VRR and is G-SYNC compatible, but it doesn't support HDMI Forum VRR.

    7.3
    VRR Motion Performance
    See details on graph tool
    Recommended VRR OD Setting
    Normal
    Variable Overdrive Advertised
    No
    Avg. CAD
    181
    Best CAD
    128
    Worst CAD
    309

    Frame RateCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    179HeatmapChartPhoto
    165HeatmapChartPhoto
    144HeatmapChartPhoto
    120HeatmapChartPhoto
    100HeatmapChartPhoto
    80HeatmapChartPhoto
    60HeatmapChartPhoto

    The motion handling is decent across its VRR range. While the 'Normal' setting has the best motion handling down to just above 60Hz, 'Off' also performs fairly well and has less inverse ghosting below 60Hz. However, the 'Extreme' setting doesn't perform well at any refresh rate. Its CAD is so high that it exceeds the limit of our default graph, though you can see its performance in an alternate graph.

    7.8
    Refresh Rate Compliance
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Compliance @ Max Hz
    56%
    Compliance @ 120 FPS
    67%
    Compliance @ 60 FPS
    74%

    The refresh rate compliance is good. However, its response time isn't fast enough to make full-color transitions before the monitor begins drawing the next frame.

    8.1
    CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
    OD Transition Max Refresh Rate
    od-transition-max-refresh-rate-extreme-0-31
    OD extreme
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    Avg. CAD
    128
    Best 10% CAD
    38
    Worst 10% CAD
    254

    Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    OffHeatmapChartPhoto
    NormalHeatmapChartPhoto
    ExtremeHeatmapChartPhoto

    The CAD at the max refresh rate of 180Hz is great, and there's not too much blur or ghosting, though there is some smearing in darker shades. The recommended Over Drive setting is 'Normal,' as 'Off' has much more blur, and 'Extreme' has much more inverse ghosting.

    Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    First Response Time
    4.7 ms
    Total Response Time
    6.4 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    2 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    14.2 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    16.4 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    11 RGB

    Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
    OffHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    NormalHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    ExtremeHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

    7.3
    CAD @ 120Hz
    OD Transition 120Hz
    od-transition-120-extreme-0-31
    OD extreme
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    Avg. CAD
    185
    Best 10% CAD
    40
    Worst 10% CAD
    368

    Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    OffHeatmapChartPhoto
    NormalHeatmapChartPhoto
    ExtremeHeatmapChartPhoto

    The CAD at 120Hz is decent, with only a moderate amount of blur or ghosting, though there is some smearing in darker shades. The recommended Over Drive setting is 'Normal,' as 'Off' has much more blur, and 'Extreme' has much more inverse ghosting.

    Response Time @ 120Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    First Response Time
    4.4 ms
    Total Response Time
    10.9 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    8 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    12.4 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    25.5 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    27 RGB

    Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
    OffHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    NormalHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    ExtremeHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

    7.4
    CAD @ 60Hz
    OD Transition 60Hz
    od-transition-60-extreme-0-31
    OD extreme
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    Avg. CAD
    167
    Best 10% CAD
    39
    Worst 10% CAD
    377

    Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    OffHeatmapChartPhoto
    NormalHeatmapChartPhoto
    ExtremeHeatmapChartPhoto

    The CAD at 60Hz is decent, with only a moderate amount of blur or ghosting, though there's more smearing than at 120Hz. The recommended Over Drive setting is 'Normal,' as 'Off' has much more blur, and 'Extreme' has a bit more inverse ghosting.

    Response Time @ 60Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Normal
    First Response Time
    7.2 ms
    Total Response Time
    7.5 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    0 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    20.8 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    21.1 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    2 RGB

    Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
    OffHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    NormalHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    ExtremeHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    Yes
    Maximum Frequency
    180 Hz
    Minimum Frequency
    120 Hz
    Longest Pulse Width Brightness
    238 cd/m²
    Shortest Pulse Width Brightness
    190 cd/m²
    Pulse Width Control
    Yes
    Pulse Phase Control
    No
    Pulse Amplitude Control
    No
    VRR At The Same Time
    No

    Refresh RateBFI SettingMotion Blur Photo
    180HzNormalPhoto
    180HzExtremePhoto
    120HzNormalPhoto
    120HzExtremePhoto

    The Acer Nitro XZ322QU has a backlight strobing feature called VRB to reduce persistence blur. However, you can only use it at 180Hz or 120Hz, and it causes image duplication. If you try to adjust brightness while VRB is on it turns off.

    The 'Longest Pulse Width Brightness' measurement is from the 'Normal' VRB mode, while the 'Shortest Pulse Width Brightness' measurement is from the 'Extreme' VRB mode.

    8.4
    VRR Flicker
    Dark Gray Flicker
    1.2 RGB
    Middle Gray Flicker
    1.2 RGB
    Light Gray Flicker
    1.4 RGB

    While this monitor doesn't have VRR flicker in brighter scenes, it does have flicker in the darkest parts of scenes. Even though the flicker isn't immediately apparent, it's not hard to spot again once you see it.

    10
    Image Flicker
    Flicker-Free
    Yes
    PWM Dimming Frequency
    0 Hz

    The backlight is completely flicker-free, which helps reduce eye strain if you're sensitive to it.

    Inputs
    9.0
    Input Lag
    Native Resolution @ Max Hz
    3.3 ms
    Native Resolution @ 120Hz
    4.7 ms
    Native Resolution @ 60Hz
    8.7 ms
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    5.9 ms

    Settings

    Ultra-Low Latency: On

    The input lag is very low. The input lag is slightly higher when Ultra-Low Latency is turned 'Off' or when you're using backlight strobing (VRB), as you can see below:

    Refresh RateBacklight Strobing (VRB) SettingUltra-Low Latency ModeInput Lag
    180HzOffOff3.5 ms
    120HzOffOff4.7 ms
    60HzOffOff9.5 ms
    180HzNormalOff6.0 ms
    180HzExtremeOff6.0 ms
    180HzNormalOn6.0 ms

    The Backlight Strobing (BFI) measurement is with VRB set to 'Extreme' and Ultra-Low Latency 'On.' 

    6.9
    Resolution
    Native Resolution
    2560 x 1440
    Aspect Ratio
    16:9
    Megapixels
    3.7 MP
    Pixel Density
    93 PPI
    4.9
    PS5 Compatibility
    4k @ 120Hz
    No
    4k @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz
    Yes

    This monitor only supports some of the PS5's capabilities. Additionally, while it supports HDR, you need to manually set the monitor to 'HDR 400' for the PS5 to recognize it as HDR-capable.

    7.1
    Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
    4k @ 120Hz
    No
    4k @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz
    Yes

    This monitor works well with the Xbox Series X|S. However, while it supports HDR, you need to manually set the monitor to 'HDR 400' for the Xbox to recognize it as HDR-capable. The Xbox only supports HDR with 4k signals, so HDR only working at 4k isn't a limitation of the monitor.

    Inputs
    DisplayPort
    1 (DP 1.2)
    DisplayPort Transmission Bandwidth
    No DisplayPort 2.1
    Mini DisplayPort
    No
    HDMI
    2 (HDMI 2.0)
    HDMI 2.1 Bandwidth
    No HDMI 2.1
    Daisy Chaining
    No
    3.5mm Audio Out
    Yes
    Ethernet
    No
    HDR10
    Yes
    Dolby Vision
    No

    While some sites list this monitor having DisplayPort 1.4 bandwidth, we can confirm this monitor has DisplayPort 1.2 bandwidth.

    USB
    USB-A Ports
    0
    USB-A Rated Speed
    No USB-A Ports
    USB-B Upstream Port
    No
    USB-C Ports
    0
    USB-C Upstream
    No USB-C Ports
    USB-C Rated Speed
    No USB-C Ports
    USB-C Power Delivery
    No USB-C Ports
    USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode
    No USB-C Ports
    Thunderbolt
    No
    macOS Compatibility

    ConnectionHDMI 2.0USB-C to DP
    Max Refresh Rate144Hz165Hz
    VRR RangeN/A48-165Hz
    HDRYesYes (up to 120Hz and not with VRR)

    The Acer XZ322QU V3bmiiphx works well with macOS. If you're using a MacBook, closing the lid migrates windows from the MacBook to the Acer's display if you have a keyboard and mouse attached. When re-opening the MacBook or resuming from sleep, windows return to their previous position. HDR looks good, provided you turn off the Super Sharpness feature, which is on by default in HDR.

    Features
    Additional Features
    Speakers
    Yes
    RGB Illumination
    No
    Multiple Input Display
    No
    KVM Switch
    No
    Smart OS
    No

    The Acer Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx has some extra features, like:

    • Aim Point: Displays a virtual crosshair that your game's anti-cheating tool won't detect.
    • Black Boost: Brightens darker parts of scenes so that it's easier to see opponents better in games.
    • Low Blue Light: Reduces blue light to help reduce eye strain.
    • Refresh Rate Num: Displays the current refresh rate of the display.

    On-Screen Display (OSD)

    You can learn more about the monitor's settings in the user manual. You can access it by expanding the 'Documents' section of the Product Support page.

    Comments

    1. Product

    Acer Nitro XZ322QU V3bmiiphx: Main Discussion

    Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

    PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
    Sort by:
    newest first
    1. Update: We’ve added the Samsung Galaxy Buds2 Pro True Wireless to the Notable Mentions and verified the text for accuracy and clarity.

      What do you think of these changes? Let us know

      Show More Updates
    2. 3
      2
      1
      2
      0

      I think none of these are Wired for a high-quality and latency free experience, be it gaming, composing or listening to music.

    3. Update: We’ve made minor updates to the text and checked that the products are in stock.

      What do you think of these changes? Let us know

      Show More Updates
    4. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      There are two different kinds of noise cancellation when it comes to making calls / video calls: noise cancellation for the one making the call, and noise cancellation for the one receiving the call. I wish you made this clear and included this in your test. If I’m in a video call, I want earbuds that have a noise suppressing microphone / algorithm so that my colleagues can hear me without the background noise in my environment.

      Edited 1 year ago: Spelling
    5. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Hi,

      Thanks for taking the time to reach out to us. Improving our evaluation of the microphone and the noise suppressions features is definitely something we want to tackle in upcoming improvements to our headphone review. Feel free to reach out again If you have any other suggestions or specific improvements you would like to see!

    6. We’ve just released a new video featuring the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds Truly Wireless here.

      Show More Updates
    7. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Is there a reason you don’t test wind? Wind is a huge factor to consider, since it directly affects the sound and can really ruin an earbud if it doesn’t handle wind properly. Especially when jogging or cycling. Is there a reason this isn’t tested? Seems like a no-brainer to me!

    8. We’ve just released a new video featuring the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds Truly Wireless here.

      Show More Updates
    9. 3
      2
      1
      2
      0

      Is there a reason you don’t test wind? Wind is a huge factor to consider, since it directly affects the sound and can really ruin an earbud if it doesn’t handle wind properly. Especially when jogging or cycling. Is there a reason this isn’t tested? Seems like a no-brainer to me!

      Hi stray_cactus, I agree, wind can be an important factor when deciding on purchasing a new headphone. Although we don’t currently test for wind, we are working on a new test bench update that will include a test for ANC wind noise. I hope that helps, and if you have any other questions or comments please let us know!

    10. We’ve just released a new video featuring the Anker Soundcore Space A40 Truly Wireless here.

      Show More Updates
    11. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Bought BOSE QC Ultra based on “raving reviews” - static noise drove me insane during the 1st week of ownership! Design is flawed and its defects are referenced all over the net. Returned it and “settled” for Bowers & Wilkins PI7 S2. Do your due diligence!

    12. We’ve just released a new video featuring the Anker Soundcore Space A40 Truly Wireless here.

      Show More Updates
    13. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Hey guys! Looks like an editing error was made and the Apple AirPods (2nd generation) Truly Wireless was listed as the best noise cancelling earbuds for iPhone when it should be the Pro model 2nd generation..

      Edited 1 year ago: AirPods Pro
    14. Hey guys! Looks like an editing error was made and the Apple AirPods (2nd generation) Truly Wireless was listed as the best noise cancelling earbuds for iPhone when it should be the Pro model 2nd generation..

      Thanks for bringing this to our attention, Protomize. We’ve now corrected the error.

      Show More Updates
    15. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      what would be the best one for sports and travel?

    16. what would be the best one for sports and travel?

      Hello! Help with personalized buying advice is something our experts offer only via our insider forums. We do have lots of self-service tools and recommendation articles that should be helpful as well though!

      Show More Updates
    17. 1
      0
      -1
      1
      -1

      I wonder if you notice that on the Amazon page https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0B1LVC5VZ in the ‘Compare soundcore Headphones’ it says “Soundcore Liberty 4 Pro” has ANC 3.0 (even the ‘Liberty 4 NC has ANC 2.0), while the 'Space 40’ you’ve reviewed above, has ANC 1 (or no number).

      And so it seems the Liberty 4 pro is newer & more advance than the one you reviewed.

      Edited 6 months ago: proofing
    18. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      I think none of these are Wired for a high-quality and latency free experience, be it gaming, composing or listening to music.

      I used mine to watch TV & the latency is fine. Most can be adjusted by the video player app.

    19. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      I wonder if you notice that on the Amazon page https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0B1LVC5VZ in the ‘Compare soundcore Headphones’ it says “Soundcore Liberty 4 Pro” has ANC 3.0 (even the ‘Liberty 4 NC has ANC 2.0), while the 'Space 40’ you’ve reviewed above, has ANC 1 (or no number). And so it seems the Liberty 4 pro is newer & more advance than the one you reviewed.

      Hey, Absolutely, the Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 Pro and Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 NC are newer than the Anker Soundcore Space A40. We’ve not tested the Liberty 4 Pro, so I can’t comment on their performance. However, we have tested the Liberty 4 NC, and while these have excellent noise isolation performance, you can see the overall noise isolation performance is slightly better on the older model in this side-by-side comparison.

      The two pairs have different pros and cons, which can influence your decision, but since (at the moment) the A40 are notably cheaper and block out more noise overall, they’ve earned a spot on the list, despite not being the newest model. That said, the passive isolation of the Liberty 4 NC is a bit more consistent at blocking out high-pitched noises, while the A40’s ANC is more effective at filtering out low-pitched noises, which is typically the strength of noise cancellation. I hope this helps explain how we arrived at the A40 for our pick.

    20. Update: We’ve checked this article to ensure all our picks are in stock and pricing remains consistent, but we’ve made no changes.

      What do you think of these changes? Let us know

      Show More Updates