- Table of Contents
- Intro
- Design
- Picture Quality
- Motion
- Inputs
- Sound Quality
- Smart Features
- Sizes and Variants
- Compared
- Conclusion
- Q&A
Samsung NU7100
TV REVIEW
Test Benches: test
- 1.2: Winter 2018
- 1.1: Summer 2017
- 1.0: Winter 2015
- 0.9: Winter 2014
- 0.8: Winter 2013
- 22% TV Shows
- 22% Sports
- 16% Movies
- 16% Video Games
- 10% HDR Gaming
- 9% HDR Movies
- 6% PC Monitor
- 20% Contrast
- 17% Local Dimming
- 12% 1080p Input
- 10% Black Uniformity
- 8% Gray Uniformity
- 8% 4k Input
- 6% 24p Judder
- 5% Motion Interpolation
- 5% Stutter
- 3% SDR ABL
- 3% Pre Calibration
- 2% Post Calibration
- 2% 480p Input
- 29% Reflections
- 16% SDR Peak Brightness
- 11% Viewing Angle
- 9% 1080p Input
- 7% 720p Input
- 5% Gray Uniformity
- 5% 4k Input
- 5% Sound Quality
- 5% Smart Features
- 3% Motion Interpolation
- 2% Permanent Burn-In Risk
- 2% Pre Calibration
- 2% Temporary Image Retention
- 1% Post Calibration
- 25% Reflections
- 20% Response Time
- 14% SDR Peak Brightness
- 11% Viewing Angle
- 10% Gray Uniformity
- 8% 720p Input
- 5% Sound Quality
- 4% Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
- 2% Permanent Burn-In Risk
- 1% Flicker-Free
- 1% Temporary Image Retention
- 33% Input Lag
- 22% Response Time
- 6% 1080p Input
- 6% 4k Input
- 4% Contrast
- 4% Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
- 3% Reflections
- 3% Gray Uniformity
- 3% Sound Quality
- 3% Local Dimming
- 2% Black Uniformity
- 2% SDR Peak Brightness
- 1% Flicker-Free
- 1% Permanent Burn-In Risk
- 1% Pre Calibration
- 1% Stutter
- 1% Variable Refresh Rate
- 1% 4k @ 60Hz
- 1% Temporary Image Retention
- 1% Post Calibration
- 1% 1440p @ 60Hz
- 22% Contrast
- 14% Local Dimming
- 12% 4k Input
- 11% Black Uniformity
- 6% HDR Peak Brightness
- 6% Color Gamut
- 6% Color Volume
- 5% Gray Uniformity
- 4% Stutter
- 4% 24p Judder
- 3% HDR ABL
- 2% Motion Interpolation
- 2% Pre Calibration
- 2% Gradient
- 1% Post Calibration
- 1% HDR10
- 1% Dolby Vision
- 25% 4k @ 60Hz + HDR
- 15% Response Time
- 8% Contrast
- 7% Color Gamut
- 7% Color Volume
- 5% Local Dimming
- 4% 1080p Input
- 4% 4k Input
- 4% Black Uniformity
- 3% HDR ABL
- 3% HDR Peak Brightness
- 3% Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
- 2% Gray Uniformity
- 2% Gradient
- 2% Reflections
- 1% Variable Refresh Rate
- 1% HDR10
- 1% Dolby Vision
- 1% Sound Quality
- 1% Permanent Burn-In Risk
- 1% Flicker-Free
- 1% Pre Calibration
- 1% Temporary Image Retention
- 1% Post Calibration
- 28% Inputs
- 14% Viewing Angle
- 13% Response Time
- 8% Permanent Burn-In Risk
- 6% Reflections
- 5% Temporary Image Retention
- 4% 4k Input
- 3% SDR Peak Brightness
- 3% 1080p @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4
- 3% 4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4
- 2% Contrast
- 2% Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
- 2% Curved
- 2% Gray Uniformity
- 2% 1080p Input
- 1% Local Dimming
- 1% Black Uniformity
- 1% Flicker-Free
- 1% Pre Calibration
- 0% Post Calibration
The Samsung NU7100 is a decent 4k LED TV. It has decent picture quality with a good native contrast ratio but lacks more advanced features to improve the dark room performance such as local dimming. It has extremely low input lag which is excellent for gamers but the response time is only decent so some blur is visible behind fast moving objects. When viewed at an angle the image also loses accuracy, so the best picture is reserved for those directly in front of the TV.
See our recommendations for the best LED TV.
| Design | 8.5 |
| Picture Quality | 7.3 |
| Motion | 6.2 |
| Inputs | 9.3 |
| Sound Quality | 6.5 |
| Smart Features | 7.4 |
- Excellent low input lag
- Good uniformity
- Limited HDR capabilities
- Picture quality degrades when viewed at an angle
Check Price
Design
The design of the Samsung NU7100 is great. It incorporates design features found in higher-end models like the similar legs to the Q8FN (without the silver finish.) and the same back as the NU8000.
The back of the TV has the same textured finish found in this year's NU8000. There are a few cable management tracks that span the entire width of the back of the TV. Also the TV comes with two clips that attach to the stand legs to also assist with cable management.
The TV looks thin when viewed from the side and resembles the also new NU8000. It too lacks the OneConnect mini, saving you the trouble of where to place it when wall mounting the TV. At the same time, changing connections is not a as simple as with the OneConnect.
The NU7100 gets warm along the bottom edge of the panel where the LEDs are. This is common for many Samsung models and should not be a problem.
Picture Quality
- 11% Contrast
- 6% Local Dimming
- 6% SDR Peak Brightness
- 6% HDR Peak Brightness
- 6% Gray Uniformity
- 7% Viewing Angle
- 4% Black Uniformity
- 6% Reflections
- 4% Pre Calibration
- 1% Post Calibration
- 6% 480p Input
- 9% 720p Input
- 11% 1080p Input
- 6% 4k Input
- 4% Color Gamut
- 4% Color Volume
- 2% Gradient
- 1% Temporary Image Retention
- 1% Permanent Burn-In Risk
The Samsung NU7100 produces decent picture quality. It has a good native contrast ratio, but it is lower than normal for this type of panel. It isn't very bright either, especially in HDR, and is better suited for viewing in a dim room. It has good gray uniformity, with very little dirty screen effect, great for sports fans. It has a limited color gamut, and poor color volume, so it performs its best with SDR content. It has great reflection handling.
The contrast on the TV is great, and in-line with other Samsung TVs like the NU7300. This is good for producing deep dark scenes.
Update 06/15/2018: We have reset the TV and retested the native contrast ratio, and it is a bit higher. It is likely that the calibration raised the black levels slightly, lowering the previously measured contrast ratio.
The Samsung NU7100 does not have a local dimming feature. The above video is provided for reference only.
- 64% SDR Real Scene Peak Brightness
- 5% SDR Peak 2% Window
- 5% SDR Peak 10% Window
- 5% SDR Peak 25% Window
- 5% SDR Peak 50% Window
- 5% SDR Peak 100% Window
- 2% SDR Sustained 2% Window
- 2% SDR Sustained 10% Window
- 2% SDR Sustained 25% Window
- 2% SDR Sustained 50% Window
- 2% SDR Sustained 100% Window
- 1% SDR ABL
- 64% HDR Real Scene Peak Brightness
- 5% HDR Peak 2% Window
- 5% HDR Peak 10% Window
- 5% HDR Peak 25% Window
- 5% HDR Peak 50% Window
- 5% HDR Peak 100% Window
- 2% HDR Sustained 2% Window
- 2% HDR Sustained 10% Window
- 2% HDR Sustained 25% Window
- 2% HDR Sustained 50% Window
- 2% HDR Sustained 100% Window
- 2% HDR ABL
Disappointing HDR peak brightness. It is fairly consistent across all input windows. Small highlights in dark scenes are dimmed by the TV's algorithms, as shown by our 2% window test. Like with SDR, the HDR performance is worse than last year's Samsung lineup. Similar performance to the budget-level LG UK6300.
- 40% 50% Std. Dev.
- 40% 50% DSE
- 10% 5% Std. Dev.
- 10% 5% DSE
The TV has a good gray uniformity. In the 50% gray test picture you can notice it is a little darker on the sides and especially on the corners. This fades as we move towards the center of the screen where things are pretty even and thus, the minor dirty screen effect is hardly noticeable. This is very good for those who will use the TV mostly for sports viewing.
The 5% gray uniformity is very good with no noticeable brighter spots.
- 20% Color Shift
- 40% Brightness
- 40% Black Level
The Samsung NU7100 has a poor viewing angle, but it is better than last year's MU6300. The black levels shift dramatically when viewing even slightly off center.
- 75% Native Std. Dev.
- 25% Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
The Samsung NU7100 has an excellent black uniformity, similar to the 2017 MU6300 and one of the best among LED TVs. The are no clouding issues and black looks very uniform. As a result, dark scenes in movies look great.
- 45% White Balance dE
- 45% Color dE
- 9% Color Temperature
Out of the box color accuracy is decent. The Movie picture mode provided the most accurate settings. White balance and color dE are a bit high but most people won't notice a huge difference. Gamma is high, and color temperature is a bit warm.
- 45% White Balance dE
- 45% Color dE
- 9% Color Temperature
After calibration with the Movie picture mode, the white balance is almost perfect and colors are much better. Gamma follows our target 2.2 almost perfectly, although the color temperature is a little off from our target of 6500K.
See our recommended settings here.
- 25% DCI P3 xy
- 25% DCI P3 uv
- 25% Rec 2020 xy
- 25% Rec 2020 uv
The NU7100 supports a standard color gamut only and is best suited for SDR content. Like the 2017 MU6500, red and green fall quite short of their HDR targets.
The 'Movie' Picture mode is the most accurate, but it doesn't follow our PQ curve. The brightness rolls off gradually as the TV gets closer to its peak brightness. The PC and Game EOTFs are very similar to 'Movie', but also don't follow our target very closely.
Disappointing color volume, mainly due to the limited color gamut of the TV. It is unable to produce deep, dark colors, and it is limited in its ability to produce bright saturated colors like those in a sunset or bright outdoor scene.
- 25% Red (Std. Dev.)
- 25% Green (Std. Dev.)
- 25% Blue (Std. Dev.)
- 25% Gray (Std. Dev.)
The TV displays our test pattern well but in real-world tests, there are small points of banding in large areas of similar color.
There is no temporary image retention on the NU7100.
We don't expect the TV to experience burn-in, as the VA panel in our long-term test appears immune.
Motion
- 53% Response Time
- 11% Flicker-Free
- 4% Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
- 5% Motion Interpolation
- 12% Stutter
- 11% 24p Judder
- 5% Variable Refresh Rate
The motion handling of the Samsung NU7100 is mediocre. The refresh rate is decent, but in dark scenes, it is a bit high so sci-fi fans might be a bit disappointed. The backlight has improved over the MU6300, and it now flickers at 240 Hz, which is less noticeable. It can also reduce the backlight frequency to 60Hz, helping motion appear smoother but introducing visible flicker. The NU7100 cannot remove judder from any source, although most people won't notice this.
- 50% 80% Response Time
- 50% 100% Response Time
Decent response time. In dark scenes like our 20% test slide the 100% transition is very slow and there is some motion trail.
It is slightly worse than last year's MU6300, and similar to the MU7000. While it isn't bad, competing TVs from other brands like the LG UK6300 offer better motion performance.
Most of the blur in the above photo is due to duplications caused by the backlight flicker.
Similar to the Q8FN, the flicker varies depending on settings.
The Samsung NU7100 uses PWM to dim the backlight except when at 100%. It flickers at a high frequency (240Hz), but due to pwm at lower brightness levels, the flicker becomes more noticeable. This year's model is an improvement over the MU6300 with its 120Hz flicker, but it is still not as good as the Sony X850F
When Auto Motion Plus is enabled with the slider set to 0, the backlight flickers at 120Hz, as seen here. This creates a duplicated motion trail similar to when motion interpolation is enabled.
Similar to the Q8FN, the flicker varies depending on settings. There is almost no flicker in 'Movie' mode with the backlight at 100% and 'Auto Motion Plus' set to Custom.
The TV has an optional black frame insertion feature to help motion appear smoother. When enabled, this feature reduces the flicker frequency to 60Hz. As on all Samsung TVs, this is enabled by setting 'Auto Motion Plus' to Custom, and enabling 'LED Clear Motion'.
New to this year's NU7100 is the ability to keep the 120Hz flicker when in game mode. This can help motion in games appear smoother if you don't mind the visible flicker.
Similar to the Q8FN, the flicker varies depending on settings.
The TV is able to interpolate 30 fps content up to 60 fps, the native refresh rate of the panel. This can help motion appear more fluid, but some people don't like the Soap Opera Effect this causes. To enable it, set 'Auto Motion Plus' to Custom, and adjust the 'Judder Reduction' slider to your preference.
In motion scenes there are visible artifacts, when the motion gets too intense the TV stops interpolating.
Similar to the Q8FN, the flicker varies depending on settings.
The Samsung UN55NU7100 is great at displaying content without stutter, even for low frame rate movies. The higher response time helps the transition between frames appear smoother.
The TV cannot remove judder from 24 fps content played through a 60p/i cable box, or from native 24 fps content played from a Blu-ray. Most people aren't very sensitive to judder and won't see it.
- 25% 4k VRR Maximum
- 25% 4k VRR Minimum
- 25% 1080p VRR Maximum
- 25% 1080p VRR Minimum
The Samsung NU7100 does not support any of the variable refresh rate technologies like AMD's Freesync. This was tested with an Xbox One S and with a Radeon RX 580.
The Samsung NU7100 has excellent low input lag and supports most common resolutions, except for 1440p which is becoming popular with gamers. The input lag is extremely low when in PC or Game mode, among the lowest measured. It supports chroma 4:4:4 without any issues, which combined with the low input lag, makes it a good choice for a PC monitor. Like all Samsungs we have reviewed recently, there is no DTS passthrough; this shouldn't be an issue since most sources have both audio formats.
- 35% 1080p @ 60Hz
- 3% 1080p @ 60Hz + HDR
- 37% 4k @ 60Hz
- 19% 4k @ 60Hz + HDR
- 3% 4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4
- 3% 4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4 + 8 bit HDR
Excellent low input lag. When Game mode is activated, the TV bypasses all processing. This is among the best input lags of any TV, better than similar models from last year like the MU6300, and almost as good as this year's LG UK6300.
When the input label is set to PC, the input lag is automatically the lowest possible. There is no benefit to activating Game mode within PC mode.
- 17% 1080p @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4
- 17% 1080p @ 120Hz
- 17% 1440p @ 60Hz
- 17% 4k @ 30Hz @ 4:4:4
- 17% 4k @ 60Hz
- 17% 4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4
The NU7100 supports most of the common resolutions without any issues. It doesn't support 1440p.
4k @ 60 hz with 4:4:4 or 4:2:2 chroma is only supported when HDMI UHD Color is enabled from the External Device Manager settings menu.
The TV includes breakout adapters for a composite or component connection. There is a shared connection on these and as such, it is impossible to connect a component and composite connection at the same time.
Like other 2018 Samsung TVs, the NU7100 does not support DTS passthrough. This shouldn't be an issue as most content has both. For the audio return channel to work, Anynet+ (HDMI-CEC) must be enabled from the settings menu.
The NU7100 does not support 5 Ghz wifi.
Sound Quality
- 75% Frequency Response
- 25% Distortion
The Samsung NU7100 has an average sound. This TV doesn't have deep bass and won't produce any thump or rumble, but has a decent amount of punch to its bass and produces clear and intelligible dialogs. It also gets decently loud but may not be loud enough for large and noisy environments. For a better sound, dedicated speakers or soundbars are recommended.
- 30% Low-Frequency Extension
- 5% Std. Dev. @ 70
- 20% Std. Dev. @ 80
- 15% Std. Dev. @ Max
- 20% Max
- 10% Dynamic Range Compression
The frequency response is about average. LFE (low-frequency extension) is at 80Hz, which is above average. This means this TV won't produce any thump or rumble, but will have a decent amount of punch to its bass. The response above the LFE is quite flat and well-balanced, which results in clear and intelligible dialogs. However, since it doesn't have a room correction system, it wasn't able to remove the modes of our test room around 200Hz. Additionally, this TV gets decently loud, but may not be loud-enough for large and noisy environments.
- 40% Weighted THD @ 80
- 25% Weighted THD @ Max
- 10% IMD @ 80
- 25% IMD @ Max
The distortion performance is about average. The overall amount of harmonic distortion at 80dB SPL is decent. The produce THD doesn't rise dramatically at maximum volume either, which is good but the TV doesn't get very loud.
Smart Features
The Samsung NU7100 has the same interface as the NU8000, minus the Bixby voice assistant. The interface is easy to navigate and works well, although there are some issues with lag when accessing the interface from within an app. Like all Samsung TVs, there are ads and they cannot be removed. The remote app is very basic, far simpler than the remote apps from the other TV manufacturers.
The interface is similar to that of the NU8000 but lacks some of the more advanced features, including the Bixby voice assistance. It is easy to navigate, with a simplistic but modern design.
On the NU7100, there are very few animations. The interface is generally smooth, without much lag. When using an external device, the interface remains fluid, but when accessing the menus from within an app it would lag at times.
Like all Samsung TVs, there are ads. There is no option to disable them or to opt-out of ad tracking. During our testing there were ads, but we were unable to take a picture of them. They appear similar to the ads seen on the NU8000
Samsung's App Store has one of the widest selections of apps, second to the Google Play Store on Sony TVs. There are a few apps preinstalled, the same ones found on most TVs (Amazon Video, Netflix, YouTube, etc...).
The Samsung 55NU7100 comes with a very basic remote. The buttons cover most of the basic functions, including inputs, quick access to the settings menu, and a picture size button to control the upscaling options for lower resolution content.
Samsung's SmartThings app can be used as a replacement remote but the options are very limited. Although it is possible to act as a full remote control of the TV, it cannot change inputs directly (it is necessary to navigate the on-screen menus). Like most remote apps, it cannot be used to input text.
There is a single button located underneath the TV, similar to the NU8000. Pressing the button brings up a menu that can power cycle the TV, control volume, channels, and change inputs.
Differences between Sizes and Variants
We tested the 55" (UN55NU7100) version FA01. For the most part, we expect our review to be valid for the other sizes of this model.
If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their Samsung NU7100 doesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we will update the review.
| Size | Model | US | UK | Europe |
| 40" | UN40NU7100 | UN40NU7100FXZA | UE40NU7120KXXU | UE40NU7190UXZG |
| 43" | UN43NU7100 | UN43NU7100FXZA | UE43NU7120KXXU | UE43NU7190UXZG |
| 49" | UN49NU7100 | N/A | UE49NU7100KXXU | UE49NU7170UXZG |
| 50" | UN50NU7100 | UN50NU7100FXZA | N/A | N/A |
| 55" | UN55NU7100 | UN55NU7100FXZA | UE55NU7100KXXU | UE55NU7170UXZG |
| 65" | UN65NU7100 | UN65NU7100FXZA | UE65NU7100KXXU | UE65NU7170UXZG |
| 75" | UN75NU7100 | UN75NU7100FXZA | UE75NU7100KXXU | UE75NU7170UXZG |
Compared to other TVs
The Samsung NU7100 is a versatile entry-level 4k TV with decent picture quality. It is aggressively priced, but there are better TVs out there in the same price range.
The Sony X690E is a versatile entry-level TV released in 2017. It is available in larger sizes and performs similarly to the Samsung NU7100. They have very similar picture quality but the X690E has better motion handling. Overall, the X690E is a bit better at almost everything.
The Samsung MU8000 is a good mid-range TV. It is better than the NU7100 in almost every aspect. It is brighter than the NU7100 but is slightly worse in a very dark room. It has better motion handling, but some people might notice the flicker a bit more. Most people should get the MU8000.
The 2017 Samsung MU6300 is very similar to the NU7100. The 6300 is brighter and has a better native contrast ratio. They have similar motion handling, but the NU7100 has lower input lag. Unless you are a gamer and want the absolute lowest input lag possible, the MU6300 is better for most people.
The Samsung NU8000 is a good mid-range LED TV. It is better than the NU7100 in almost every aspect. It produces a wider array of colors and is brighter, making for a much more enjoyable HDR experience. They are both great choices for gaming, but if you can afford the higher price of the NU8000, it is a much better TV.
Conclusion
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
- 22% TV Shows
- 22% Sports
- 16% Movies
- 16% Video Games
- 10% HDR Gaming
- 9% HDR Movies
- 6% PC Monitor
- 20% Contrast
- 17% Local Dimming
- 12% 1080p Input
- 10% Black Uniformity
- 8% Gray Uniformity
- 8% 4k Input
- 6% 24p Judder
- 5% Motion Interpolation
- 5% Stutter
- 3% SDR ABL
- 3% Pre Calibration
- 2% Post Calibration
- 2% 480p Input
- 29% Reflections
- 16% SDR Peak Brightness
- 11% Viewing Angle
- 9% 1080p Input
- 7% 720p Input
- 5% Gray Uniformity
- 5% 4k Input
- 5% Sound Quality
- 5% Smart Features
- 3% Motion Interpolation
- 2% Permanent Burn-In Risk
- 2% Pre Calibration
- 2% Temporary Image Retention
- 1% Post Calibration
- 25% Reflections
- 20% Response Time
- 14% SDR Peak Brightness
- 11% Viewing Angle
- 10% Gray Uniformity
- 8% 720p Input
- 5% Sound Quality
- 4% Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
- 2% Permanent Burn-In Risk
- 1% Flicker-Free
- 1% Temporary Image Retention
- 33% Input Lag
- 22% Response Time
- 6% 1080p Input
- 6% 4k Input
- 4% Contrast
- 4% Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
- 3% Reflections
- 3% Gray Uniformity
- 3% Sound Quality
- 3% Local Dimming
- 2% Black Uniformity
- 2% SDR Peak Brightness
- 1% Flicker-Free
- 1% Permanent Burn-In Risk
- 1% Pre Calibration
- 1% Stutter
- 1% Variable Refresh Rate
- 1% 4k @ 60Hz
- 1% Temporary Image Retention
- 1% Post Calibration
- 1% 1440p @ 60Hz
- 22% Contrast
- 14% Local Dimming
- 12% 4k Input
- 11% Black Uniformity
- 6% HDR Peak Brightness
- 6% Color Gamut
- 6% Color Volume
- 5% Gray Uniformity
- 4% Stutter
- 4% 24p Judder
- 3% HDR ABL
- 2% Motion Interpolation
- 2% Pre Calibration
- 2% Gradient
- 1% Post Calibration
- 1% HDR10
- 1% Dolby Vision
- 25% 4k @ 60Hz + HDR
- 15% Response Time
- 8% Contrast
- 7% Color Gamut
- 7% Color Volume
- 5% Local Dimming
- 4% 1080p Input
- 4% 4k Input
- 4% Black Uniformity
- 3% HDR ABL
- 3% HDR Peak Brightness
- 3% Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
- 2% Gray Uniformity
- 2% Gradient
- 2% Reflections
- 1% Variable Refresh Rate
- 1% HDR10
- 1% Dolby Vision
- 1% Sound Quality
- 1% Permanent Burn-In Risk
- 1% Flicker-Free
- 1% Pre Calibration
- 1% Temporary Image Retention
- 1% Post Calibration
- 28% Inputs
- 14% Viewing Angle
- 13% Response Time
- 8% Permanent Burn-In Risk
- 6% Reflections
- 5% Temporary Image Retention
- 4% 4k Input
- 3% SDR Peak Brightness
- 3% 1080p @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4
- 3% 4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4
- 2% Contrast
- 2% Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
- 2% Curved
- 2% Gray Uniformity
- 2% 1080p Input
- 1% Local Dimming
- 1% Black Uniformity
- 1% Flicker-Free
- 1% Pre Calibration
- 0% Post Calibration
Questions & Answers
I can't understand why Samsung would have such an inferior contrast ratio from last years comparable model. Even though you say the new model does a good job, nothing replaces that HUGE difference in contrast numbers IMHO.
I watch most of my TV at night after work not in a fully lit room.
We don't understand it either, but while the native contrast is a lot lower than last year, it isn't bad per se. It is on the low end for a VA panel, but is still much higher than an IPS panel. In a dimly lit room most people won't notice it too much, it would be mostly noticeable in a completely black room.
I'm interested in using a 40" 4K TV as a PC monitor. From what I've seen, the older Samsung 40MU7000 looks to be a bit better than the 40NU7100. Am I missing anything? Thanks so much for your help!
Thank you for contacting us.
As you can see in the main differences section of the side-by-side comparison of the two models NU7100 and MU7000, the new NU7100 is slightly better for PC usage due to better input lag. It is also cheaper so get the NU7100.
I currently own the Samsung MU6300 and looking into upgrading to a T.V with better HDR capabilities. The MU6300 states that it has HDR Pro but not the HDR 10 technology.I have always been a Samsung guy so I will most likely stick with that brand.
I was interested in the new NU7100 model but after looking at this review, it seems like that would be a waste. Would you say the MU6300 (rating 7.4) is a better overall TV than the new NU7100 (rating 7.3)? Would it be best to wait for the NU8000 to go on sale?
If you're looking to upgrade just for the HDR capabilities, you would be better to wait for the NU8000. Between the MU6300 and NU7100 there is no significant difference in HDR capabilities. The NU8000 on the other hand would be a pretty significant upgrade, especially for movies thanks to the higher HDR peak brightness and wide color gamut support.
Currently I am torn between the 43" NU7100, if it really is VA and not IPS, or TCL 43" S517. TCL has better black, motion and wider color, but lacks motion interpolation; the NU7100 has better uniformity for blacks. I am disappointed in the NU7100, they are offering it cheaper than last year's model, but that's because features have been removed.
On the other hand there is the dithering issue on the TCL at 4k, which I think is bad but only if you are sitting right on top of the screen. Still, that should not happen, this dithering issue would drive me me insane. TCL is definitely the cheap and better performing option.
I use my HDTV and big screen for my PC games and consoles, as such motion handling is high on prioritizes along with good contrast, better black uniformity and low input lag.
For your usage the NU7100 would actually be the better choice. It has slightly better performance for gaming, HDR gaming and for use as a PC Monitor. The response time is slightly worse, but still good enough for gaming unless you are particularly sensitive to motion blur.
The MU6300 is a little better than the NU7100 for almost all uses, but really you should get whichever one is cheaper. Best Buy has some of the MU6300 sizes available on clearance for less than the NU7100. Definitely don't pay more for the NU7100, it isn't an upgrade.
Update 07/17/2018: The NU7500 is the curved variant of the NU7400, not the NU7100. The curved variant of the NU7100 is the NU7300 and both of these models are very similar to the NU7400 and NU7500, just without a wide color gamut.
I currently have the JU6500 from a few years ago, but only the first HDMI input supports HDR. Is it worth it to upgrade to this model?
Have a question?Before asking a question, make sure you use the search function of our website. The majority of the answers are already here.
