ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM Monitor Review

Tested using Methodology v1.1
Reviewed Aug 25, 2020 at 08:09 am
ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM Picture
8.0
Mixed Usage
7.9
Office
8.7
Gaming
7.8
Multimedia
7.9
Media Creation
7.2
HDR Gaming
Size 25"
Resolution 1920x1080
Max Refresh Rate
280 Hz
Pixel Type
IPS
Variable Refresh Rate
FreeSync

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is an excellent IPS monitor that delivers a smooth and responsive gaming experience. It shares many similarities with its bigger brother, the ASUS VG279QM, as it also has a 1080p resolution and a 280Hz refresh rate. It has great visibility in bright environments thanks to its impressive peak brightness, but to the contrary, it isn't as well-suited for dark rooms due to its low contrast ratio. It has exceptionally fast response time, a Black Frame Insertion feature, as well as native FreeSync support and G-SYNC compatibility. It supports HDR10; however, HDR content doesn't look significantly better than in SDR because it lacks a wide color gamut and local dimming. On the upside, it has a great build quality, wide viewing angles, and outstanding ergonomics.

Our Verdict

8.0 Mixed Usage

Overall, the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is a great monitor. It provides a responsive and smooth gaming experience with its low input lag and high refresh rate. Its wide viewing angles and outstanding ergonomics make it easier to share work or content, and its impressive peak brightness makes it suitable for brightly-lit settings. Sadly, while it does support HDR, it can't display a wide color gamut and lacks local dimming.

Pros
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Good reflection handling.
  • Outstanding ergonomics.
Cons
  • Low HDR peak brightness.
  • Low contrast ratio.
7.9 Office

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is a good monitor for office use. The screen may be too small for some, especially for multitasking; however, it keeps the pixel density high, so text and images look sharper. It gets bright enough to overcome glare, and it handles reflections well. It has outstanding ergonomics and wide viewing angles, making it easy to share your work with coworkers.

Pros
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Good reflection handling.
  • Outstanding ergonomics.
Cons
  • Low HDR peak brightness.
  • Screen size a bit small for multitasking.
8.7 Gaming

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is an excellent gaming monitor. It has low input lag, and its motion handling is superb thanks to its fast response time, high refresh rate, and Black Frame Insertion feature. It supports FreeSync natively and is compatible with NVIDIA's G-SYNC. Unfortunately, it has a low contrast ratio that makes it less ideal for gaming in the dark, and its compact size may be too small for some.

Pros
  • High refresh rate.
  • VRR support.
  • Exceptionally fast response time.
  • Outstanding ergonomics.
Cons
  • Low HDR peak brightness.
  • Low contrast ratio.
7.8 Multimedia

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is a good monitor for media consumption. It has a decent screen size with wide viewing angles so you can share content with others, and its outstanding ergonomics allow you to adjust the screen to your optimal viewing position with ease. It has an impressive peak brightness and good reflection handling to combat glare in bright rooms, but its dark room performance isn't that great due to its low contrast ratio.

Pros
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Outstanding ergonomics.
  • Excellent gray uniformity.
Cons
  • Low HDR peak brightness.
  • Low contrast ratio.
7.9 Media Creation

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is a good monitor for media creation. Its 24.5 inch screen provides a decent amount of space to work with, and its outstanding ergonomics allow you to position it however you like. It has near full coverage of the sRGB color space, but its coverage of Adobe RGB is much more limited. Unfortunately, it has a low contrast ratio, and it can't display a wide color gamut.

Pros
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Outstanding ergonomics.
  • Excellent gray uniformity.
Cons
  • Low HDR peak brightness.
  • Low contrast ratio.
7.2 HDR Gaming

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is a decent monitor for gaming in HDR. It has fast response time, high refresh rate, and low input lag for a responsive gaming experience. However, its low contrast ratio, as well as the lack of a wide color gamut and local dimming, limits its HDR performance. Also, it doesn't get bright enough to make highlights pop.

Pros
  • High refresh rate.
  • VRR support.
  • Exceptionally fast response time.
  • Outstanding ergonomics.
Cons
  • Low HDR peak brightness.
  • Low contrast ratio.
  • Can't display a wide color gamut.
  • No local dimming.
  • 8.0 Mixed Usage
  • 7.9 Office
  • 8.7 Gaming
  • 7.8 Multimedia
  • 7.9 Media Creation
  • 7.2 HDR Gaming
  1. Updated Aug 28, 2020: We tested the response time with the hidden 120 overdrive mode.

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
Design
Style
Curved No
Curve Radius Not Curved
Weight (without stand)
6.0 lbs (2.7 kg)
Weight (with stand)
11.0 lbs (5.0 kg)

The ASUS VG259QM looks almost identical to its bigger brother, the ASUS VG279QM, just in a smaller, more compact size. It has thin bezels on three sides and a slightly thicker bottom bezel. It isn't too flashy and won't look out of place in an office setting.

Design
Stand
Width
10.8" (27.5 cm)
Depth
8.3" (21.2 cm)

The stand is relatively small and doesn't take up too much desk space. It supports the monitor well, and there's minimal wobble.

9.2
Design
Ergonomics
Height Adjustment
5.1" (13.0 cm)
Switch Portrait/Landscape Yes, Both Ways
Swivel Range -90° to 90°
Tilt Range -30° to 5°

Outstanding ergonomics. It has a wide swivel range and can rotate to portrait mode in either direction.

Design
Back
Wall Mount VESA 100x100

The back of the monitor is plastic and relatively plain. It can be VESA-mounted, but there's no quick-release feature. There's a small cutout at the bottom of the stand that serves as cable management.

Design
Borders
Borders
0.3" (0.8 cm)

The borders are thin, making it a good option for multi-monitor setups.

Design
Thickness
Thickness (with stand)
6.3" (16.0 cm)
Thickness (without stand)
2.2" (5.5 cm)

The screen itself is thin, and even when mounted on the stand, it doesn't take up much space.

8.0
Design
Build Quality

The ASUS VG259QM has a great build quality. It's mostly plastic, but it's of good quality and feels sturdy. There aren't any obvious issues with the construction.

Picture Quality
6.5
Picture Quality
Contrast
Native Contrast
1,364 : 1
Contrast With Local Dimming
N/A

The ASUS VG259QM has an okay contrast ratio. It's quite decent for an IPS panel, but blacks still look grayish in the dark.

Note that the contrast ratio can vary between units.

0
Picture Quality
Local Dimming
Local Dimming
No
Backlight
Edge

The ASUS TUF VG259QM doesn't have a local dimming feature. The video above is provided for reference only.

8.1
Picture Quality
SDR Peak Brightness
SDR Real Scene
374 cd/m²
SDR Peak 2% Window
387 cd/m²
SDR Peak 10% Window
388 cd/m²
SDR Peak 25% Window
388 cd/m²
SDR Peak 50% Window
388 cd/m²
SDR Peak 100% Window
388 cd/m²
SDR Sustained 2% Window
387 cd/m²
SDR Sustained 10% Window
388 cd/m²
SDR Sustained 25% Window
388 cd/m²
SDR Sustained 50% Window
388 cd/m²
SDR Sustained 100% Window
388 cd/m²
SDR ABL
0.000

Great SDR peak brightness. It's bright enough to combat glare in most lighting conditions and very consistent across different content.

We measured the SDR peak brightness after calibration, using the 'Racing' Picture Mode and with Brightness set to maximum.

6.6
Picture Quality
HDR Peak Brightness
HDR Real Scene
374 cd/m²
HDR Peak 2% Window
390 cd/m²
HDR Peak 10% Window
391 cd/m²
HDR Peak 25% Window
392 cd/m²
HDR Peak 50% Window
392 cd/m²
HDR Peak 100% Window
392 cd/m²
HDR Sustained 2% Window
390 cd/m²
HDR Sustained 10% Window
390 cd/m²
HDR Sustained 25% Window
391 cd/m²
HDR Sustained 50% Window
391 cd/m²
HDR Sustained 100% Window
391 cd/m²
HDR ABL
0.000

The HDR peak brightness is okay. The brightness is very consistent when displaying different scenes. It's bright enough to deliver an alright HDR experience in games, but not in HDR movies. It's also significantly dimmer than the ASUS VG279QM, which is expected.

We measured the HDR peak brightness before calibration, using the 'ASUS Gaming HDR' Picture Mode. The screen's brightness is locked in this picture mode.

7.5
Picture Quality
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Left
30°
Color Washout From Right
31°
Color Shift From Left
52°
Color Shift From Right
53°
Brightness Loss From Left
32°
Brightness Loss From Right
33°
Black Level Raise From Left
70°
Black Level Raise From Right
70°
Gamma Shift From Left
50°
Gamma Shift From Right
49°

Like most IPS panels, the ASUS VG259QM has good horizontal viewing angles, but it isn't as good as the ASUS VG279QM. Colors appear washed out when you reach moderate viewing angles, and brightness decreases as well.

6.8
Picture Quality
Vertical Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Below
28°
Color Washout From Above
28°
Color Shift From Below
39°
Color Shift From Above
39°
Brightness Loss From Below
33°
Brightness Loss From Above
32°
Black Level Raise From Below
70°
Black Level Raise From Above
70°
Gamma Shift From Below
30°
Gamma Shift From Above
29°

The vertical viewing angles are okay. The top and bottom of the screen remain accurate even if you sit up close due to the smaller screen size. It's more important if you have a multi-monitor setup where it's mounted above eye level.

8.5
Picture Quality
Gray Uniformity
50% Std. Dev.
3.879%
50% DSE
0.106%
5% Std. Dev.
0.438%
5% DSE
0.044%

Gray uniformity on our unit of the ASUS TUF VG259QM is excellent. It's a bit darker at the edges, but it's otherwise very uniform, and it's even better in near-dark scenes.

Note that gray uniformity can vary between units.

7.1
Picture Quality
Black Uniformity
Native Std. Dev.
1.204%
Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
N/A

Our unit of the ASUS VG259QM has decent black uniformity. There's clouding throughout, and a bit of backlight bleed along the top and bottom of the screen.

Note that black uniformity can vary between units.

7.2
Picture Quality
Pre Calibration
Picture Mode
sRGB
Luminance
153 cd/m²
Luminance Settings
N/A
Contrast Setting
80
RGB Controls
100-100-100
Gamma Setting
No Gamma Setting
Color Temperature
6,513 K
White Balance dE
3.32
Color dE
3.13
Gamma
2.16

Before calibration, the ASUS VG259QM has decent color accuracy. It has an sRGB mode that's more accurate than the Racing Mode that we used on the ASUS VG279QM, but using it locks the screen's brightness. There are some minor inaccuracies with a few colors, and white balance is off. Gamma doesn't follow the curve all that well, making dark scenes too dark and bright scenes brighter than they should be. The color temperature is very close to our 6500K target.

Note that the pre-calibration color accuracy can vary between units.

9.7
Picture Quality
Post Calibration
Picture Mode
Racing Mode
Luminance
100 cd/m²
Luminance Settings
17
Contrast Setting
80
RGB Controls
97-100-95
Gamma Setting
No Gamma Setting
Color Temperature
6,462 K
White Balance dE
0.43
Color dE
0.45
Gamma
2.18

After calibration, color accuracy is superb. Any remaining color inaccuracies shouldn't be visible to the naked eye. White balance and gamma are nearly perfect. The color temperature is a bit warmer than what we initially started with, but still close to our target.

You can download our ICC profile calibration here.

8.6
Picture Quality
SDR Color Gamut
sRGB xy
96.8%
Adobe RGB xy
74.3%
sRGB Picture Mode
Racing Mode
Adobe RGB Picture Mode
Racing Mode

The ASUS VG259QM has an excellent SDR color gamut. It has near-full coverage of the commonly-used sRGB color space, but its coverage of the Adobe RGB color space is only decent. If you want a gaming monitor with an even wider SDR color gamut, check out the ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ.

8.8
Picture Quality
SDR Color Volume
sRGB In ICtCp
96.4%
Adobe RGB In ICtCp
80.5%
sRGB Picture Mode
Racing Mode
Adobe RGB Picture Mode
Racing Mode

Excellent SDR color volume. It has trouble displaying very bright blues, which is typical for LCDs, and it can't display dark colors well due to its low contrast ratio.

6.4
Picture Quality
HDR Color Gamut
Wide Color Gamut
No
DCI P3 xy
70.7%
Rec. 2020 xy
57.6%
DCI P3 Picture Mode
Asus Gaming HDR
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
Asus Gaming HDR

Although the ASUS VG259QM has a decent DCI P3 color gamut, it can't display a wide color gamut for HDR content.

6.3
Picture Quality
HDR Color Volume
DCI-P3 In ICtCp
73.3%
Rec. 2020 In ICtCp
53.6%
DCI P3 Picture Mode
Asus Gaming HDR
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
Asus Gaming HDR

The HDR color volume is mediocre. It can't display a wide color gamut, and can't display dark colors well.

10
Picture Quality
Image Retention
IR After 0 Min Recovery
0.00%
IR After 2 Min Recovery
0.00%
IR After 4 Min Recovery
0.00%
IR After 6 Min Recovery
0.00%
IR After 8 Min Recovery
0.00%
IR After 10 Min Recovery
0.00%

There are no signs of temporary image retention on this monitor.

Note that temporary image retention can vary between units.

8.1
Picture Quality
Gradient
Color Depth
8 Bit

Great gradient handling. There's a small amount of banding in all colors, particularly in the grays, greens, and reds.

Unlike the ASUS VG279QM, it can only receive an 8-bit input signal.

9.3
Picture Quality
Color Bleed
Pixel Row Error
0.000%
Pixel Column Error
0.144%

There's a small amount of vertical color bleed; however, it shouldn't be noticeable in regular content.

7.7
Picture Quality
Reflections
Screen Finish
Matte
Total Reflections
5.5%
Indirect Reflections
4.0%
Calculated Direct Reflections
1.5%

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM's reflection handling is good. The matte anti-reflective coating does a great job of reducing the intensity of direct reflections but doesn't do as well when it comes to bright ambient lighting.

7.0
Picture Quality
Text Clarity
Sub-Pixel Layout
RGB

Text clarity is decent. With Windows' ClearType enabled (top photo), the letters look more fleshed out, particularly the diagonal lines on the R and N. The pixels look blurry in the picture due to the monitor's matte anti-reflective coating.

Motion
9.6
Motion
Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
Best Overdrive Setting
60
Rise / Fall Time
3.7 ms
Total Response Time
6.6 ms
Overshoot Error
0.0%
Dark Rise / Fall Time
4.7 ms
Dark Total Response Time
8.2 ms
Dark Overshoot Error
0.0%

Overdrive Setting Response Time Chart Response Time Tables Motion Blur Photo
0 Chart Table Photo
20 Chart Table Photo
40 Chart Table Photo
60 Chart Table Photo
80 Chart Table Photo
100 Chart Table Photo
120 Chart Table Photo

Update 08/28/2020: There's a hidden overdrive setting of '120'. It can be accessed through the service menu, as described here. Despite the name, it's actually between the 60 and 80 settings, but we don't recommend it, as there's too much overshoot.

The ASUS VG259QM has exceptional response time when playing at its maximum refresh rate, resulting in minimal motion blur in fast-moving scenes. There are many overdrive settings available. We recommend using '60', as it provides the best performance with virtually no overshoot.

Note that we found almost no difference between the '0' and '20', or the '40' and '60' overdrive settings. We suspect that the current firmware may be causing some bugs with these settings at the maximum refresh rate. We'll retest it once a firmware update is available.

8.8
Motion
Response Time @ 60Hz
Best Overdrive Setting
40
Rise / Fall Time
3.6 ms
Total Response Time
12.3 ms
Overshoot Error
4%
Dark Rise / Fall Time
3.6 ms
Dark Total Response Time
15.6 ms
Dark Overshoot Error
8.9%

Overdrive Setting Response Time Chart Response Time Tables Motion Blur Photo
0 Chart Table Photo
20 Chart Table Photo
40 Chart Table Photo
60 Chart Table Photo
80 Chart Table Photo
100 Chart Table Photo
120 Chart Table Photo

Update 08/28/2020: There's a hidden overdrive setting of '120'. It can be accessed through the service menu, as described here. Despite the name, it's actually between the 60 and 80 settings, but we don't recommend it, as there's too much overshoot.

The response time at 60Hz is excellent, although not as good as its bigger brother, the ASUS VG279QM. The best overdrive setting is '40,' as there's only a small amount of overshoot in the darker transitions and when transitioning from dark to bright scenes.

10
Motion
Image Flicker
Flicker-Free Yes
PWM Dimming Frequency
0 Hz

The backlight is flicker-free, which can help reduce eye strain.

8.0
Motion
Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
Yes
BFI Maximum Frequency
280 Hz
BFI Minimum Frequency
85 Hz

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM has an optional Black Frame Insertion feature to help improve motion clarity called 'ELMB,' and it can be used at the same time as variable refresh rate (VRR). The standard ELMB setting (without VRR) works between 120Hz and 280Hz, while the ELMB Sync setting (with VRR) works between 50Hz and 280Hz. That said, we found that it doesn't work at all between 50Hz and 85Hz. These results are consistent with our findings on the ASUS VG279QM.

9.6
Motion
Refresh Rate
Native
240 Hz
Max Refresh Rate
280 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate
Yes
FreeSync
Yes
G-SYNC
Compatible (NVIDIA Certified)
VRR Maximum
280 Hz
VRR Minimum
< 20 Hz
VRR Supported Connectors DisplayPort, HDMI

The ASUS VG259QM's native 240Hz refresh rate can be overclocked to 280Hz using the OSD menu setting called 'Overclock,' but only over a DisplayPort connection, as the refresh rate over an HDMI connection is 240Hz. It supports FreeSync and is compatible with NVIDIA's G-SYNC; the latter only works over a DisplayPort connection.

Inputs
9.5
Inputs
Input Lag
Native Resolution
1.9 ms
Native Resolution @ 60Hz
35.0 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
2.2 ms
Variable Refresh Rate @ 60Hz
40.3 ms
10 Bit HDR
N/A
Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
4.3 ms

The ASUS VG259QM has exceptionally low input lag, even with VRR enabled. However, it rises significantly when playing at 60Hz, making it less suitable for console gaming. This higher input lag at 60Hz is also something that we noticed on the ASUS VG279QM.

7.1
Inputs
Resolution And Size
Native Resolution 1920 x 1080
Aspect Ratio 16:9
Megapixels 2.1 MP
Pixel Density
88 PPI
Screen Diagonal 25.0"
Screen Area 268 in²

The ASUS VG259QM has a decent resolution and size. The screen may be a bit small for multitasking since there's less room to have multiple windows opened side-by-side, but it's a good size for a 1080p display, as it makes the pixel density higher.

Inputs
Inputs
Inputs
Total Inputs
DisplayPort 1 (DP 1.2)
Mini DisplayPort No
HDMI 2 (HDMI 2.0)
DVI No
VGA No
DisplayPort Out No
USB 1 (USB 3.0)
USB C No
Analog Audio Out 3.5mm 1
Microphone In 3.5mm No
Digital Optical Audio Out No
Analog Audio Out RCA No
Power Supply External Brick

The USB input is a service port and can only be used for firmware updates.

Features
Features
Additional Features
RGB Illumination
No
Speakers
Yes
HDR10 Yes
Multiple Input Display
No

The ASUS VG259QM has many extra features, including:

  • Crosshair: Puts a virtual crosshair for shooter games.
  • Timer: Puts a timer on the screen.
  • FPS counter: Overlay that shows the current frame rate.
  • Display alignment: Helps align monitors in a multi-monitor setup.
  • Zoom: Zooms in to enlarge a section of the image.
  • Shadow Boost: Helps make objects more visible in dark scenes.
  • Blue light filter: Helps reduce eye strain.

Features
On-Screen Display (OSD)
Features
Controls

The monitor's controls are located on the right backside of the monitor. There are four buttons and a joystick, and they allow you to navigate the on-screen menu.

Features
In The Box

  • User guide
  • Power supply
  • Power cord
  • HDMI cable
  • DisplayPort cable

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We tested the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM, which is also available in a 27 inch size. There are many monitors in the TUF Gaming lineup, some of which you can see in the table below.

Model Size Panel Type Resolution Max Refresh Rate Variable Refresh Rate
TUF Gaming VG259QM 24.5" IPS 1920 x 1080 280Hz FreeSync
TUF Gaming VG279QM 27" IPS 1920 x 1080 280Hz FreeSync
TUF Gaming VG27VQ 27" VA 1920 x 1080 165Hz FreeSync
TUF Gaming VG27AQ 27" IPS 2560 x 1440 165Hz FreeSync

If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM doesn't correspond to our review, let us know, and we'll update the review. Note that some tests, such as gray uniformity, may vary between individual units.

Our unit of the ASUS VG259QM was manufactured in May 2020, and you can see the label here.

Compared To Other Monitors

The ASUS VG259QM is an excellent gaming monitor with fast response time and a high refresh rate; however, its smaller size isn't ideal for multitasking, and its HDR performance is limited due to the lack of a wide color gamut. For more options, check out our other recommendations for the best gaming monitors, the best FreeSync monitors, and the best budget gaming monitors.

ASUS VG279QM

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM are almost identical, as it's mostly a size difference between them. The VG279QM is slightly better, as it has wider viewing angles, better color accuracy, and gets much brighter in HDR. Gradient handling is also much better on the VG279QM since the VG259QM can only accept an 8-bit input signal.

BenQ ZOWIE XL2546K

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is much better than the BenQ ZOWIE XL2546K. The ASUS has a better contrast ratio, higher peak brightness, and wider viewing angles. It has a stand with a much wider swivel range, and it supports HDR. The BenQ has better reflection handling, and its input lag is much lower when playing at 60Hz.

Gigabyte M27Q

The Gigabyte M27Q and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM are both excellent gaming monitors, but they have very different configurations. The ASUS delivers a smoother and more responsive gaming experience because it has a higher refresh rate and faster response time. However, the Gigabyte has a larger, higher-resolution screen to provide greater immersion and more screen space for work and media consumption. The ASUS allows for more ergonomic adjustments, including swivel and pivot, which the Gigabyte lacks.

Dell Alienware AW2521HF

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is better than the Dell Alienware AW2521HF. The ASUS has a higher refresh rate to provide a smoother gaming experience, a Black Frame Insertion feature, and supports HDR. On the other hand, the Dell has a better build quality, wider viewing angles, and more USB ports for charging.

Dell Alienware AW2521H

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is slightly better for gaming than the Dell Alienware AW2521H. The ASUS has significantly better ergonomics, a bit better reflection handling, a wider BFI flicker range, and it has built-in speakers. However, the Dell has a higher 360Hz refresh rate, better response time, and slightly lower input lag.

ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM is the TN variant of the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM. The TN panel, however, doesn't offer a significant advantage, as the VG259QM is a bit better in most ways that matter. They are very similarly built and look almost identical, but the IPS panel of the VG259QM has wider viewing angles and a slightly better contrast ratio. Most importantly, it has faster response times at both the max refresh rate and 60Hz, resulting in smoother motion. It also has a better HDR color gamut.

AOC 24G2

The AOC 24G2 and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM are both 1080p IPS gaming monitors. For the most part, the ASUS performs better because it has a much higher refresh rate of 280Hz and faster response times at max refresh rate. However, it has slower response times and higher input lag at 60Hz than the AOC, making it less ideal for playing 60fps console games. The ASUS supports HDR, but it doesn't add much because it can't display a wide color gamut and doesn't get bright enough for true HDR.

ASUS ROG Swift 360Hz PG259QN

Overall, the ASUS ROG Swift 360Hz PG259QN and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM score similarly but are quite different. The PG259QN has a much higher refresh rate, significantly better out-of-the-box color accuracy, and better gradient handling. On the flip side, the VG259QM has much better ergonomics and better response time due to less overshoot.

ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259Qm is much better than the ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A for gaming. It has a significantly higher refresh rate of 280Hz, resulting in smoother motion and better responsiveness. However, the VG259QM has slower response times and a higher input lag at 60Hz, so it's not as ideal for 60fps console gaming. That said, it's better suited for productivity than the VG249Q1A because it has a bigger screen, much better ergonomics, and provides better visibility in well-lit settings. It supports HDR, whereas the VG249Q1A doesn't, but it doesn't add much because it can't display a wide color gamut.

ASUS TUF VG27AQ

Overall, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ is marginally better than the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM. The VG29AQ has a higher 1440p resolution and wider viewing angles. However, the VG259QM has a higher refresh rate and faster response time.

Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx

The Acer Nitro XF243Y and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM are both 1080p IPS gaming monitors, but the ASUS has a much higher refresh rate, 280Hz compared to the Acer's 165Hz. This results in a smoother and more responsive gaming experience. Other than that, these two monitors are remarkably similar. The ASUS is an inch bigger than the Acer.

Acer Predator X25 bmiiprzx

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the Acer Predator X25 bmiiprzx are similar monitors. The Acer has a higher refresh rate at 360Hz, compared to the 270Hz on the ASUS. However, the ASUS has a slightly quicker response time at its max refresh rate than the Acer, but it's slower at 60Hz. The Acer supports G-SYNC natively and doesn't support FreeSync, whereas the ASUS has native FreeSync support and G-SYNC compatibility. Aside from these small differences, they're both great monitors with similar features.

ASUS VG279Q

Overall, the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is better than the ASUS VG279Q. The VG259QM has a much higher refresh rate, faster response time, and HDR support. However, the VG279Q has better viewing angles, out-of-the-box color accuracy, and gradient handling.

ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV are very different monitors. The VG259QM has a 1080p monitor, a 280Hz refresh rate, and is primarily designed for gaming, while the PA278QV has a 1440p resolution, a 75Hz refresh rate, and is meant for creative professionals. The PA278QV has wider viewing angles, better color accuracy, and it gets brighter. The VG259QM has a much faster response time, and it supports HDR.

AOC CQ27G2

For most uses, the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is significantly better than the AOC CQ27G2. The ASUS gets brighter, its IPS panel has much wider viewing angles, and it has better motion handling due to its higher refresh rate and faster response time. It also has better ergonomics and supports HDR. The AOC is a better choice for dark room gaming, though, as it has a VA panel that can produce deeper blacks.

Dell S2419HGF

Overall, the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is much better than the Dell S2419HGF. The ASUS has an IPS panel with much wider viewing angles, a much higher refresh rate, and it gets significantly brighter. Its response time is faster too, and it has a Black Frame Insertion feature to further improve motion clarity. The Dell has better gradient and reflection handling.

ASUS VG246H

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is much better than the ASUS VG246H. The VG259QM has a much higher refresh rate and much better response times, so motion looks significantly better. The VG259QM also supports HDR, and the unit we tested has much better black uniformity than the VG246H. The VG259QM also has better connectivity, with an additional HDMI port and a DisplayPort input.

LG 27GN650-B

The LG 27GN650-B and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM are both 1080p gaming monitors. The ASUS is better for gaming because it has a much higher refresh rate of 280Hz compared to the LG's 144Hz, and it also has better response times. However, it has a fairly high 60Hz input lag, making it less ideal for console gaming. It has better ergonomics than the LG and gets brighter to combat glare. It has a smaller screen than the LG, but this means it has a higher pixel density to display sharper images and text.

MSI Optix MAG161V

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the MSI Optix MAG161V are very different displays with different intended uses, so they're not really directly comparable. The MSI is a portable monitor with a 16 inch 1080p screen designed for better productivity on the go. The ASUS is a desktop gaming monitor with a 25 inch 1080p screen. The ASUS delivers a much better experience overall, especially when gaming, but isn't portable.

MSI Oculux NXG253R

The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the MSI Oculux NXG253R are extremely similar overall, but the ASUS is slightly better for gaming. The ASUS has a more versatile black frame insertion feature, a better response time at the maximum refresh rate, and the stand has better ergonomics, with a wider swivel range and better tilt range. The MSI has better connectivity, though, with a built-in USB hub and support for NVIDIA's Reflex Latency Analyzer.

+ Show more

Discussions