Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T Monitor Review

Tested using Methodology v1.1
Updated Oct 26, 2021 at 12:17 am
Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T Picture
8.1
Mixed Usage
7.7
Office
8.8
Gaming
7.9
Multimedia
8.0
Media Creation
7.8
HDR Gaming
Size 32"
Resolution 2560x1440
Max Refresh Rate
240 Hz
Pixel Type
VA
Variable Refresh Rate
FreeSync

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is a high refresh rate gaming monitor. It's part of Samsung's 2020 Odyssey gaming lineup, and it's one of the few monitors available in two sizes: 27 and 32 inches, which we tested. It has a fast 240Hz refresh rate with native FreeSync variable refresh rate (VRR) support to reduce screen tearing. It's also G-SYNC compatible if you want to use it with an NVIDIA graphics card. The 1440p resolution helps deliver clear images while not being too taxing on your graphics card. It's a well-built monitor with an aggressive 1000R curved screen, which may not be to everyone's liking, but it helps bring the entire screen within your field of view. Its VA panel makes it a great choice for dark room gaming, but even though it has an edge-lit local dimming feature, it performs terribly.

Our Verdict

8.1 Mixed Usage

The Samsung Odyssey G7 is a great overall monitor. It has amazing gaming performance because of its 240Hz refresh rate, outstanding response time, and FreeSync support. It's a good choice for content creators or for watching movies as it can display deep blacks. Unfortunately, it's not ideal for sharing your screen with coworkers due to its narrow viewing angles.

Pros
  • Outstanding response time.
  • Native FreeSync support and it's G-SYNC compatible.
  • Great contrast ratio.
  • Very good reflection handling.
Cons
  • Doesn't get very bright in HDR.
  • Narrow viewing angles.
  • Reported issues of backlight flicker with certain content.
7.7 Office

The Samsung Odyssey G7 is good for office use. It has a large, 32 inch screen with a 1440p resolution, giving you enough screen space to multitask. Sadly, because of its VA panel, it has narrow viewing angles, which isn't ideal for sharing your screen with others. On the upside, it gets bright enough to combat glare, and it has very good reflection handling.

Pros
  • Very good reflection handling.
  • Exceptional gradient handling.
  • Great text clarity.
Cons
  • Narrow viewing angles.
8.8 Gaming

The Samsung Odyssey G7 is amazing for gaming. It has a native 240Hz refresh rate, FreeSync support, and is compatible with NVIDIA's G-SYNC. The response time at its max refresh rate and 60Hz are both outstanding, resulting in minimal blur. Its narrow viewing angles make it less ideal for co-op gaming, but luckily, it displays deep blacks if you want to game in the dark. We received reports of the backlight flickering with VRR enabled, but we didn't notice any flicker; rather, the screen dims when a certain image is displayed full-screen.

Pros
  • Outstanding response time.
  • Native FreeSync support and it's G-SYNC compatible.
  • Great contrast ratio.
  • Incredibly low input lag.
Cons
  • Narrow viewing angles.
  • Problems with 60Hz VRR.
7.9 Multimedia

The Samsung Odyssey G7 is very good for multimedia consumption. It has a big 32 inch screen, and it has a high 1440p resolution. Unfortunately, it's not ideal to watch the latest videos with a big group of friends since it has narrow viewing angles. However, it's a great choice for watching movies in a dark room because it displays deep blacks, thanks to its VA panel.

Pros
  • Great contrast ratio.
  • Impressive coverage of the Adobe RGB color space.
  • Exceptional gradient handling.
Cons
  • Narrow viewing angles.
8.0 Media Creation

The Samsung Odyssey G7 is great for media creation. Its 32 inch screen allows you to open multiple windows at once without having to scroll too much. However, the screen's aggressive curve may not be to everyone's liking while photo editing. Fortunately, it has impressive coverage of the Adobe RGB color space.

Pros
  • Great contrast ratio.
  • Impressive coverage of the Adobe RGB color space.
  • Exceptional gradient handling.
Cons
  • Narrow viewing angles.
7.8 HDR Gaming

The Samsung Odyssey G7 is good for HDR gaming, mainly due to its amazing gaming performance. It has a 240Hz refresh rate, FreeSync support, an outstanding response time, and incredibly low input lag. Sadly, HDR content doesn't look all that different from SDR because it doesn't get bright enough in HDR to truly bring out highlights.

Pros
  • Outstanding response time.
  • Native FreeSync support and it's G-SYNC compatible.
  • Great contrast ratio.
  • Incredibly low input lag.
Cons
  • Doesn't get very bright in HDR.
  • Narrow viewing angles.
  • 8.1 Mixed Usage
  • 7.7 Office
  • 8.8 Gaming
  • 7.9 Multimedia
  • 8.0 Media Creation
  • 7.8 HDR Gaming
  1. Updated Jul 30, 2021: We measured the response time with the VRR Control setting on and off at both the max response time and 60Hz. We also rechecked the pixel inversion issue.
  2. Updated Dec 18, 2020: There are reports of issues when displaying a specific pattern at 1080p. We can replicate it, but we're not sure what the cause is.
  3. Updated Nov 26, 2020: We've retested the image flicker with the latest firmware version 1009.3.
  4. Updated Aug 17, 2020: Retested brightness, HDR color gamut, and HDR color volume.
  5. Updated Aug 03, 2020: Review published.
  6. Updated Jul 30, 2020: Early access published.

Video

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
Design
Style
Curved Yes
Curve Radius 1000R
Weight (without stand)
11.0 lbs (5.0 kg)
Weight (with stand)
15.0 lbs (6.8 kg)

The Samsung Odyssey G7 is a modern-looking gaming monitor with an aggressive curve. Its body is all black with controllable RGB lighting on the bottom bezel and a ring on the back. If you want a VA monitor without a curved screen, check out the LG 32GN650-B.

Design
Stand
Width
22.4" (57.0 cm)
Depth
12.0" (30.6 cm)

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has a V-shaped stand, so you can still place objects in front of it. It has a fairly big footprint, and overall, the stand supports the monitor well.

6.9
Design
Ergonomics
Height Adjustment
4.7" (12.0 cm)
Switch Portrait/Landscape Yes, Clockwise
Swivel Range -15° to 15°
Tilt Range -15° to 5°

The ergonomics are okay overall, and it offers more adjustments than most curved screens. The Samsung Odyssey G7 switches into portrait mode, rare for a curved monitor, but it has a limited tilt and swivel range. If you're looking for a monitor with better ergonomics, check out the ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM.

Design
Back
Wall Mount VESA 100x100

The back of the Samsung Odyssey G7 27 inch monitor has textured plastic on it, and there's a ring of RGB lighting. Cable management is serviced through the stand. The plastic cover comes off so you can place the cables through the stand, keeping your setup clean.

Design
Borders
Borders
0.4" (1.0 cm)
Design
Thickness
Thickness (with stand)
11.6" (29.5 cm)
Thickness (without stand)
7.4" (18.9 cm)

Due to the Samsung Odyssey G7's aggressive curve, the screen itself is very thick, and it gets much thicker with the stand attached. You need a deep desk if you still want some space to put your keyboard and mouse.

8.0
Design
Build Quality

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has a great build quality. It's made out of good-quality plastic that feels solid. The curve doesn't appear uniform throughout as it seems more curved in the center than at the sides, but overall, there aren't any obvious issues with this monitor.

Picture Quality
8.3
Picture Quality
Contrast
Native Contrast
3,912 : 1
Contrast With Local Dimming
3,913 : 1

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has a great contrast ratio, so it displays deep blacks, which is expected from a VA panel. It has a local dimming feature, but it doesn't improve the contrast ratio because the checkerboard test pattern keeps all the dimming zones on. Note that this contrast ratio is much higher than Samsung's advertised 2500:1 contrast, and there appears to be significant variance in contrast between units.

Since the contrast measurements are quite a bit higher than Samsung's specifications for this display, we remeasured the contrast ratio. We did it with different equipment and even with a different way to measure contrast, but we obtained very similar results. We also tried adjusting different settings to see if that made a difference. With 'Black Equalizer' at 10, we measured a contrast ratio of 3922:1, at '13' it was 3935:1, and at '20' it was 3892:1, so it's not much different from our original numbers. As all of these tests are consistent, we're confident in our measurements.

2.5
Picture Quality
Local Dimming
Local Dimming
Yes
Backlight
Edge

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has a local dimming feature, but like most edge-lit monitors, it's terrible. There are only a handful of vertical dimming zones, and it takes time for each zone to light up when there are fast-moving objects. This causes uniformity issues, especially in the test pattern, but it isn't as distracting in real content because the algorithm doesn't seem as aggressive as the one on the Samsung CHG70.

8.0
Picture Quality
SDR Peak Brightness
SDR Real Scene
341 cd/m²
SDR Peak 2% Window
540 cd/m²
SDR Peak 10% Window
544 cd/m²
SDR Peak 25% Window
478 cd/m²
SDR Peak 50% Window
373 cd/m²
SDR Peak 100% Window
334 cd/m²
SDR Sustained 2% Window
534 cd/m²
SDR Sustained 10% Window
538 cd/m²
SDR Sustained 25% Window
474 cd/m²
SDR Sustained 50% Window
372 cd/m²
SDR Sustained 100% Window
333 cd/m²
SDR ABL
0.032

The Samsung C32G75T has great SDR peak brightness, similar to the Samsung CHG70. It gets bright enough to combat glare, but it's not very consistent with varied content, so large, bright areas of the screen don't get very bright. We tested the peak brightness after calibration with local dimming on and brightness set to its max, and we were able to get the brightest image possible with these settings, as seen in the 2% peak window test. We had originally measured it without local dimming and we got around 320 nits with most windows, so the local dimming feature makes it brighter.

If you prefer a Samsung monitor that has better peak brightness because it has Mini LED backlighting, then look into the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9.

6.8
Picture Quality
HDR Peak Brightness
HDR Real Scene
407 cd/m²
HDR Peak 2% Window
528 cd/m²
HDR Peak 10% Window
531 cd/m²
HDR Peak 25% Window
474 cd/m²
HDR Peak 50% Window
363 cd/m²
HDR Peak 100% Window
324 cd/m²
HDR Sustained 2% Window
522 cd/m²
HDR Sustained 10% Window
524 cd/m²
HDR Sustained 25% Window
471 cd/m²
HDR Sustained 50% Window
362 cd/m²
HDR Sustained 100% Window
324 cd/m²
HDR ABL
0.032

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has just okay peak brightness in HDR. Small highlights are bright enough to stand out, but most scenes aren't bright enough for most HDR content. There aren't any picture settings available in HDR, so it's at its default. We had originally tested it with local dimming off, and we got around 310 nits for most windows, so it's best to leave local dimming on. We tested it with a linker via HDMI from a Blu-ray player.

In addition to our regular testing methods, we measured the peak brightness with regular Windows HDR over a DisplayPort connection, and it's much dimmer at a peak of 237 nits in the 2% window. We also tested the peak brightness according to VESA's standards, and we were able to get a peak brightness of 558 nits in the 10% peak window test, which is close to the advertised 600 nits, but it quickly dropped down to 484 nits.

6.0
Picture Quality
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Left
32°
Color Washout From Right
33°
Color Shift From Left
65°
Color Shift From Right
65°
Brightness Loss From Left
32°
Brightness Loss From Right
33°
Black Level Raise From Left
17°
Black Level Raise From Right
17°
Gamma Shift From Left
14°
Gamma Shift From Right
13°

Like most VA panel monitors, the Samsung Odyssey G7 has narrow horizontal viewing angles. The image loses its color accuracy and looks darker as you move off-center, so it's not ideal for sharing your screen with someone sitting next to you. The curved edges are meant to bring them within your field of vision so they don't look inaccurate, but we measure it from the center of the screen. If you want a 32 inch monitor with much better viewing angles, check out the Corsair XENEON 32QHD165.

5.8
Picture Quality
Vertical Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Below
31°
Color Washout From Above
31°
Color Shift From Below
64°
Color Shift From Above
67°
Brightness Loss From Below
32°
Brightness Loss From Above
32°
Black Level Raise From Below
11°
Black Level Raise From Above
10°
Gamma Shift From Below
13°
Gamma Shift From Above
12°

Once again, the Samsung Odyssey G7 32 has narrow vertical viewing angles. The images look inaccurate if you mount it above eye level or if you view it while standing up.

8.5
Picture Quality
Gray Uniformity
50% Std. Dev.
2.769%
50% DSE
0.107%
5% Std. Dev.
1.166%
5% DSE
0.091%

The gray uniformity is excellent. The screen is uniform throughout, and even though the edges are a bit darker, it's not too noticeable. Uniformity is slightly better in near-dark scenes, but the backlight bleed is more noticeable. Keep in mind that uniformity can vary between units, but it's rarely an issue on monitors.

6.6
Picture Quality
Black Uniformity
Native Std. Dev.
1.667%
Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
1.081%

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has some uniformity issues when displaying a bright object in a dark scene, but this can vary between units. It looks worse in person than in the photos because the curved screen doesn't show the worst parts. Without local dimming, there's noticeable backlight bleed, and we took a high exposure photo to exaggerate what it looks like, but it's not really what you see in person. The local dimming feature helps fix any issues, but there are still some problems, as you can see in the photo.

7.5
Picture Quality
Pre Calibration
Picture Mode
FPS
Luminance
312 cd/m²
Luminance Settings
100
Contrast Setting
75
RGB Controls
50-50-50
Gamma Setting
Mode 1
Color Temperature
6,236 K
White Balance dE
2.86
Color dE
3.08
Gamma
2.01

The Samsung Odyssey G7 32 has good out-of-the-box accuracy. Most colors and shades of gray are slightly inaccurate, but most people shouldn't notice this. The color temperature is a bit warm, giving the image a red/yellow tint. Unfortunately, gamma follows the curve terribly, and most scenes are too bright, especially with extremely bright scenes. Keep in mind that out-of-the-box accuracy can vary between units.

9.5
Picture Quality
Post Calibration
Picture Mode
Custom
Luminance
101 cd/m²
Luminance Settings
14
Contrast Setting
75
RGB Controls
43-46-50
Gamma Setting
Mode 1
Color Temperature
6,431 K
White Balance dE
0.60
Color dE
0.75
Gamma
2.19

After calibration, the Samsung Odyssey G7 has remarkable color accuracy. Any remaining inaccuracies aren't noticeable without the aid of a colorimeter, but blue is a bit inaccurate. Gamma is improved and follows the curve almost perfectly.

You can download our ICC profile calibration here. This is provided for reference only and shouldn't be used, as the calibration values vary per individual unit even for the same model due to manufacturing tolerances.

9.1
Picture Quality
SDR Color Gamut
sRGB xy
98.2%
Adobe RGB xy
83.2%
sRGB Picture Mode
Custom
Adobe RGB Picture Mode
Custom

The Samsung G7 32 has an outstanding SDR color gamut. It has near-perfect coverage of the sRGB color space and impressive coverage of the Adobe RGB color space used in photo editing.

9.4
Picture Quality
SDR Color Volume
sRGB In ICtCp
98.4%
Adobe RGB In ICtCp
90.1%
sRGB Picture Mode
Custom
Adobe RGB Picture Mode
Custom

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has an incredible color volume, better than the Samsung CHG70. Due to its great contrast ratio, it can display deep, saturated colors really well, and it also does a good job with bright colors.

7.7
Picture Quality
HDR Color Gamut
Wide Color Gamut
Yes
DCI P3 xy
86.3%
Rec. 2020 xy
67.6%
DCI P3 Picture Mode
HDR Mode
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
HDR Mode

The Samsung Odyssey G7 32 has a good HDR color gamut. It displays a wide color gamut with excellent coverage of the commonly-used DCI P3 color space, but it has somewhat limited coverage of the wider Rec. 2020 color space. These results are with the local dimming enabled, and with it disabled, we measured 73.4% DCI P3 coverage, and 64.4% for Rec. 2020.

Note that the DCI P3 coverage is lower than the advertised 95%. This is normal and is due to the way we measure DCI P3. We measure DCI P3 by sending a Rec. 2020 signal, but unlike most reviewers, we limit the colors to the DCI P3 primaries. This results in a lower but arguably more accurate measurement.

7.6
Picture Quality
HDR Color Volume
DCI-P3 In ICtCp
84.8%
Rec. 2020 In ICtCp
66.9%
DCI P3 Picture Mode
HDR Mode
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
HDR Mode

The HDR color volume of the Samsung Odyssey G7 is good. Its good HDR color gamut helps the monitor display a wide range of colors at different luminance levels. Like with the HDR color gamut, we originally measured it with local dimming disabled. We got 68.1% for DCI P3 color volume and 62.2% for Rec. 2020, so we suggest leaving local dimming on.

10
Picture Quality
Image Retention
IR After 0 Min Recovery
0.00%
IR After 2 Min Recovery
0.00%
IR After 4 Min Recovery
0.00%
IR After 6 Min Recovery
0.00%
IR After 8 Min Recovery
0.00%
IR After 10 Min Recovery
0.00%

The Samsung G7 32 shows some signs of temporary image retention immediately after we switch from our high-contrast static test image to a gray test slide. It disappears almost immediately, though, and isn't noticeable with regular content. This can vary between individual units, but it's rarely an issue with any monitor.

9.8
Picture Quality
Gradient
Color Depth
10 Bit

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has exceptional gradient handling. There's almost no visible banding in any color.

10
Picture Quality
Color Bleed
Pixel Row Error
0.001%
Pixel Column Error
0.001%

There are no visible signs of color bleed on the Samsung Odyssey G7.

7.9
Picture Quality
Reflections
Screen Finish
Matte
Total Reflections
4.8%
Indirect Reflections
3.2%
Calculated Direct Reflections
1.6%

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has very good reflection handling. It performs really well with some light on it, but the reflections can get distracting if you place the monitor opposite a window.

8.0
Picture Quality
Text Clarity
Sub-Pixel Layout
RGB

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has great text clarity. With ClearType enabled (top photo), the diagonal lines on the letters R and N are clearer. This is similar to the ViewSonic Elite XG270QG.

Motion
9.4
Motion
Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
Best Overdrive Setting
Faster
Rise / Fall Time
2.8 ms
Total Response Time
7.0 ms
Overshoot Error
5.5%
Dark Rise / Fall Time
5.7 ms
Dark Total Response Time
11.5 ms
Dark Overshoot Error
3.0%

Overdrive Setting Response Time Chart Response Time Tables Motion Blur Photo
Standard Chart Table Photo
Faster Chart Table Photo
Fastest Chart Table Photo
VRR Control OffChartTableN/A
VRR Control OnChartTableN/A

Update 07/30/2021: We retested the response time at the max refresh rate with the "VRR Control" feature on and off. It has very little impact on the response time at the max refresh rate.

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has an outstanding response time at its max refresh rate of 240Hz. Motion looks exceptionally smooth, and there's almost no blur. However, it has a slow response time in dark scenes, as seen in the 0-20% total response time, which causes some artifacts, known as black smearing, typical of VA panels. The recommended overdrive setting is 'Faster' because it has less overshoot than the 'Fastest' setting.

9.4
Motion
Response Time @ 60Hz
Best Overdrive Setting
Faster
Rise / Fall Time
2.5 ms
Total Response Time
6.9 ms
Overshoot Error
7%
Dark Rise / Fall Time
5.0 ms
Dark Total Response Time
9.7 ms
Dark Overshoot Error
4.0%

Overdrive Setting Response Time Chart Response Time Tables Motion Blur Photo
Standard Chart Table Photo
Faster Chart Table Photo
Fastest Chart Table Photo
VRR Control OffChartTableN/A
VRR Control OnChartTableN/A

Update 07/30/2021: We retested the response time at 60Hz with 'VRR Control' on and off. Unfortunately, VRR isn't working correctly at 60Hz, so we recommend fully disabling it if you're gaming at 60Hz from a console.

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has an incredible response time at 60Hz, similar to the Dell S2716DGR/S2716DG. This is much better than the Samsung CHG70, and like at its max refresh rate, the recommended overdrive setting is 'Faster'. There's still a bit of overshoot, but overall, motion looks extremely smooth.

10
Motion
Image Flicker
Flicker-Free Yes
PWM Dimming Frequency
0 Hz

Update 07/30/2021: We looked into the pixel inversion issue reported below again. We can reproduce the issue by displaying a specific test pattern. Adjusting the Sharpness reduces the issue, and setting it to '45' or lower eliminates it completely on our unit. Unfortunately, this solution also results in a very soft and blurry image.

The Samsung Odyssey G7 is flicker-free at all backlight settings, which helps reduce eye strain. There have been reports of flicker with certain games, so we decided to look into it:

We noticed a flicker-like effect when displaying this GIF. It changes the brightness of the screen and causes horizontal lines to appear, and when we close the GIF, this effect stops and the screen returns to normal. The same issue appears even after updating the firmware to version 1009.3, and the new VRR Control setting doesn't seem to change anything in regards to this flicker issue. We can't replicate the same flicker some people have experienced in games (see Refresh Rate) without knowing the exact game and settings used that caused this flicker-like effect. However, we did notice this effect with Local Dimming on, as it seems the backlight turns itself on and off a few times. We also noticed the dimming zones flicker a bit during our Brightness tests. If you experience this issue, let us know in the comments below.

9.3
Motion
Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
Yes
BFI Maximum Frequency
240 Hz
BFI Minimum Frequency
60 Hz

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has an optional backlight strobing feature, commonly known as black frame insertion. It works at a wide flicker range, and like most monitors, it can't be used when VRR is enabled. Keep in mind the scoring is based on the flicker range and not the actual performance.

9.6
Motion
Refresh Rate
Native
240 Hz
Max Refresh Rate
240 Hz
Variable Refresh Rate
Yes
FreeSync
Yes
G-SYNC
Compatible (NVIDIA Certified)
VRR Maximum
240 Hz
VRR Minimum
< 20 Hz
VRR Supported Connectors DisplayPort, HDMI

Update 07/30/2021: Unfortunately, VRR doesn't appear to be functioning correctly with the refresh rate set to 60Hz. This only happened to us after firmware update 1009.3 when Samsung added the VRR Control setting; let us know if you experience the same issue.

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has native FreeSync VRR support, and it's certified by NVIDIA to be G-SYNC compatible. G-SYNC only works over a DisplayPort connection, and the refresh rate over HDMI is limited to 144Hz.

We received reports that the backlight flickers with VRR enabled. We displayed a test photo that reportedly causes this flicker with VRR enabled, and when the image was displayed full-screen, the brightness of the screen dimmed a bit. It did the same thing without VRR enabled, and when the image was at any other size than 100% scaling, the brightness went back up. We tested this in SDR, HDR, and with different games, but despite actively trying, we couldn't reproduce the issue. This appears to vary between units, as there are multiple other confirmations of units that don't flicker, but your results could vary.

Inputs
9.6
Inputs
Input Lag
Native Resolution
2.7 ms
Native Resolution @ 60Hz
9.6 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
3.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate @ 60Hz
12.7 ms
10 Bit HDR
8.4 ms
Black Frame Insertion (BFI)
2.8 ms

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has low input lag for a responsive gaming experience. It increases a bit with VRR, but it shouldn't be noticeable to most people. We also measured the 10-bit HDR input lag at 144Hz instead of its max 240Hz because that's the max refresh rate over DisplayPort, as we only measure input lag over HDMI.

8.3
Inputs
Resolution And Size
Native Resolution 2560 x 1440
Aspect Ratio 16:9
Megapixels 3.7 MP
Pixel Density
92 PPI
Screen Diagonal 32.0"
Screen Area 438 in²

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has a great 32 inch screen with a 1440p resolution, providing you enough space to multitask. There's also a 27 inch version of this monitor, which should have a 109 PPI pixel density, like the AOC CQ27G1. The higher pixel density helps improve text clarity. The newer version of this monitor, the Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70 has a 4k resolution, so the pixel density is even higher.

Note: Some users have reported issues when displaying a gray, vertically-lined image at 1080p without any scaling. We can replicate this issue, which you can read more about here; let us know if you experience the same thing.

Inputs
Inputs
Inputs
Total Inputs
DisplayPort 2 (DP 1.4)
Mini DisplayPort No
HDMI 1 (HDMI 2.0)
DVI No
VGA No
DisplayPort Out No
USB 2 (USB 3.0)
USB C No
Analog Audio Out 3.5mm 1
Microphone In 3.5mm No
Digital Optical Audio Out No
Analog Audio Out RCA No
Power Supply External Brick
Features
Features
Additional Features
RGB Illumination
Controllable
Speakers
No
HDR10 Yes
Multiple Input Display
PIP + PBP

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has a few extra features to improve the user experience. There's RGB lighting on the back that you can customize, and there are Picture-in-Picture and Picture-and-Picture modes if you want to connect two or more sources. The other features include:

  • Crosshair: Add a virtual crosshair on the screen for FPS games.
  • Black Stabilizer: Adjusts the gamma so you can see opponents in shadows in games.
  • Frame Rate Counter: Displays the current frame rate of your signal.

Features
On-Screen Display (OSD)
Features
Controls

The Samsung Odyssey G7 has a single joystick to control the on-screen display and power the monitor On/Off. It's located underneath the branding in the center.

Features
In The Box

  • Power brick and cable
  • DisplayPort cable
  • HDMI cable
  • Cable management clip
  • VESA-mount adapter
  • Manuals

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We tested the 32 inch Samsung Odyssey G7, and for the most part, we expect our review to be valid for the Odyssey G7 27 inch model (C27G75T) too. It's part of the 2020 Odyssey lineup, and you can see the differences between them below. Our results are only valid for the Odyssey G7 model. There's also a Costco variant of this monitor, known as the LC32G73TQSNXZA. It appears to have the same specs, and we expect it to perform the same.

Name Size(s) US Model Short Model Code Refresh Rate Resolution
Odyssey G3 24" LF34G35TFWNXZA LF24G35T 144Hz 1920x1080
Odyssey G3 27" LF27G35TFWNXZA LF27G35T 144Hz 1920x1080
Odyssey G5 27" LC27G55TQWNXZA LC27G55T 144Hz 2560x1440
Odyssey G5 32" LC32G55TQWNXZA LC32G55T 144Hz 2560x1440
Odyssey G5 34" LC34G55TWWNXZA LC34G55T 165Hz 3440x1440
Odyssey G7 27" LC27G75TQSNXZA LC27G75T 240Hz 2560x1440
Odyssey G7 32" LC32G75TQSNXZA LC32G75T 240Hz 2560x1440
Odyssey G9 49" LC49G95TSSNXZA LC49G95T 240Hz 5120x1440

If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their Samsung Odyssey G7 doesn't correspond to our review, let us know, and we'll update the review. Note that some tests, like gray uniformity, may vary between units.

Our unit of the Odyssey G7 was manufactured in May 2020; you can see the label here

Compared To Other Monitors

The Samsung Odyssey G7 is a really good upgrade over the Samsung CHG70, and it's one of the best gaming monitors we've tested. It's one of the few 240Hz monitors with a VA panel on the market, so if you want a fast refresh rate and a great contrast ratio, this is the one to get. Although it doesn't have wide viewing angles like some of the 240Hz monitors with an IPS panel we've seen, like the ASUS VG279QM, most people should be happy with this monitor.

Check our recommendations for the best curved gaming monitors, the best 240Hz monitors, and the best 1440p monitors.

Gigabyte M28U

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Gigabyte M28U use different panel technologies, each with strengths and weaknesses. The Samsung uses a VA panel, and it's a much better gaming monitor overall. The Samsung has a much faster response time at 60Hz, lower input lag, and better contrast. The Gigabyte, on the other hand, supports HDMI 2.1, so it's better for next-gen console gaming, and it has much better viewing angles and a higher resolution screen.

LG 27GL850-B

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is a much better gaming monitor than the LG 27GL850-B. The Samsung has a VA panel that displays deep blacks, and it has better uniformity. It also has a 240Hz refresh rate, the response time is a bit quicker, and it's available in both a 27 and 32 inch size. However, the LG has an IPS panel with much better viewing angles.

Dell S3220DGF

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is better than the Dell S3220DGF for most uses. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate, 240Hz compared to the Dell's 165Hz, and its response times are significantly faster, resulting in clearer images in fast-moving scenes. It has better reflection handling and gets brighter to combat glare. You can get the Samsung in a 27 inch or 32 inch size, but the Dell is only available in a 32 inch.

Gigabyte M27Q

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Gigabyte M27Q are both great monitors with excellent gaming performance. However, they're different. The Samsung is available in a 27 inch and 32 inch size, while the Gigabyte is only available in a 27 inch. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate of 240Hz and a faster response time, resulting in smoother motion and greater responsiveness, although the difference is not that big and might be hard to notice for casual players. The Samsung is better for dark rooms because it has a VA panel with a better contrast ratio, while the Gigabyte has wider viewing angles because it has an IPS panel. The Gigabyte has a few more features, like a USB-C input and KVM, which lets you control two devices with one set of peripherals.

Dell S2721DGF

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Dell S2721DGF are very different monitors. The Samsung has a curved VA panel and is better suited for dark rooms, while the Dell has a flat IPS panel with wider viewing angles. Gaming-wise, the Samsung performs better mainly because it has a much higher refresh rate, 240Hz compared to the Dell's 165Hz. The Dell has better response time at max refresh rate, though, especially in dark transitions. The Samsung is available in a 27 inch and 32 inch size, while the Dell is only available in a 27 inch size.

ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q

Gaming-wise, the ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q and the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T are very similar. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate than the ASUS, but the difference might not be noticeable to many gamers. Although both monitors have a black frame insertion feature to improve motion clarity, only the ASUS allows you to use it simultaneously with VRR. The most notable difference between them is that the Samsung has a curved VA panel better suited for dark rooms, while the ASUS has a flat IPS panel with wider viewing angles.

LG 27GP850-B

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the LG 27GP850-B use different panel technologies, each with strengths and weaknesses. The LG has better viewing angles, but this comes at the expense of contrast. The Samsung has much better contrast, so it's a better choice for a dark room. The Samsung's black frame insertion (BFI) feature is far more versatile, as it's available across the entire refresh rate range of the monitor, as low as 60Hz, while the BFI on the LG is only available in a narrow range.

Gigabyte M32U

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Gigabyte M32U are both excellent gaming monitors, but the better one depends a bit on your personal preferences. The Samsung uses a VA panel, and it's a better choice for a dark room. The Gigabyte has an IPS panel, so it's best for a brighter viewing environment. The Gigabyte also has better viewing angles, and it supports HDMI 2.1, so it's a better choice for Sony PS5 or Xbox Series S|X gamers.

Samsung CHG70

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is a much better gaming monitor than its predecessor, the Samsung CHG70. The Odyssey G7 has an upgraded 240Hz refresh rate, the response time is much quicker, it has a wider color gamut, and it has RGB illumination. However, the CHG70 has better out-of-the-box color accuracy, and its ergonomics are better.

LG 34GN850-B

The LG 34GN850-B and the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T are very different monitors. The Samsung is a 16:9 model available in a 27 inch or 32 inch size, while the LG is a 21:9 model that only comes in a 34 inch size. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate, but its response time isn't as good as the LG's because it has more overshoot causing inverse ghosting, as well as slow dark transitions that can result in dark smearing behind fast-moving objects. If you game in the dark, the Samsung is a much better choice because it uses a VA panel with a significantly higher contrast ratio. However, it comes at the cost of narrow viewing angles, so if you need to share your screen with someone else, the LG might be a better choice.

ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q

The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q and the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G755T are great monitors with excellent gaming performance. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate and slightly better response time, but the difference might not be noticeable for most casual players. The Samsung is better suited for dark rooms because it uses a VA panel with a much higher contrast ratio, and it supports HDR. However, the ASUS' stand allows for more ergonomic adjustments, and its IPS panel has wider viewing angles, making it a better choice for sharing content or playing co-op games.

Gigabyte G32QC

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is much better than the Gigabyte G32QC. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate and a faster response time, particularly in dark transitions, resulting in less dark smearing behind fast-moving objects. It's also much quicker at 60Hz, making it a better choice for 60fps console gaming. Although both monitors use VA panels, the Samsung has a higher contrast ratio to deliver deeper blacks. Also, it can produce a wider range of colors in HDR content.

Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70

In name, the Samsung Odyssey G7 S28AG70 is an updated version of the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T, but they're different types of monitors. The S28AG70 is a flat 4k monitor with a 28 inch screen, while the LC32G75T is a curved 1440p model available in 27 and 32 inches. The S28AG70 has an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, and the LC32G75T has a VA panel with better contrast. In terms of picture quality, the LC32G75T is better in a few areas as it gets brighter and has better reflection handling, and even though it has a quicker overall response time, the S28AG70 has better motion handling because there's less black smearing.

Samsung Odyssey G5 LC34G55T

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is much better overall than the Samsung Odyssey G5 LC34G55T. The G7 is available in both 27 and 32 inches and has a 16:9 aspect ratio. It has a higher 240Hz refresh rate, a much faster response time, and its black frame insertion feature flickers at a much wider range than on the G5. The G7 also has a local dimming feature, which the G5 doesn't have, but it doesn't add much because it performs terribly. On the other hand, the 34 inch G5 is larger and has a 21:9 aspect ratio, so there's more space to open multiple windows side-by-side.

Samsung Odyssey G5 LC27G55T

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is significantly better than the Samsung Odyssey G5 LC27G55T. The G7 has a better contrast ratio, higher refresh rate, and much faster response time. It also has a better SDR and HDR color gamut, and it gets a lot brighter. On the other hand, the G5 has built-in speakers and is much cheaper.

MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD are both great monitors with excellent gaming performance; however, they're different. The Samsung uses a VA panel and is available in a 27 inch or 32 inch size, while the MSI uses an IPS panel and is only available in a 27 inch. If you want better dark room performance, go with the Samsung because it can produce much deeper blacks. It has a higher refresh rate as well, but the difference is often hard to tell for most casual gamers. The MSI isn't as good for dark rooms due to its IPS panel's mediocre contrast, but it provides wider viewing angles, and it has USB-C input.

Dell Alienware AW2721D

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Dell Alienware AW2721D are both great monitors that use different panel types, each with advantages and disadvantages. The Samsung uses a VA panel that can produce deep blacks thanks to its high contrast ratio. The Dell uses an IPS panel that has great viewing angles at the expense of contrast ratio. Both have a low input lag and exceptional response times, although the Samsung includes a black frame insertion feature. The Dell gets much brighter in HDR, but it's limited by its low contrast ratio. The biggest difference is that the Samsung is a curved monitor while the Dell isn't.

Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50 are both excellent gaming monitors. They're both available in 27 and 32 inches, and while they have a few similar features, they're different in a few areas. The LC32G75T has a higher 240Hz refresh rate compared to 165Hz on the S27AG50, and it has a curved screen with a VA panel and a high contrast. The S27AG50 has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles, and it has a flat screen. Motion handling is fantastic on each, but there's less black smearing on the S27AG50. The LC32G75T has a local dimming feature, but it performs terribly, and even though it displays a wider color gamut, its HDR performance isn't much better.

LG 32GP850-B

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the LG 32GP850-B use different panel technologies, so the best one overall depends on your usage. The LG uses an IPS panel, and it has much better viewing angles and a slightly better response time. The VA panel on the Samsung is a better choice for a dark room, with better contrast and better black uniformity. Finally, the 1000R curve on the Samsung can provide a more immersive gaming experience than the flat screen of the LG, but curved screens aren't ideal for some use cases.

Acer Predator XB273U GXbmiipruzx

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Acer Predator XB273U GXbmiipruzx are great monitors that offer amazing gaming features; they also use different panels with different advantages. The Samsung is a VA monitor, so it has a higher contrast ratio and narrower viewing angles. It comes in both a 27 inch and 32 inch size. The Acer, on the other hand, has an IPS panel, so its contrast is worse, but it has wide viewing angles. When it comes to gaming, they both have exceptionally fast response times and low input lag.

ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ are quite different gaming monitors. The Samsung uses a VA panel and is available in a 27 inch or 32 inch size, while the ASUS uses an IPS panel and only comes in a 27 inch size. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate, but the difference might not be noticeable to casual players. If you like using a black frame insertion feature to improve motion clarity, only the ASUS allows you to use it simultaneously with VRR. The Samsung is better suited for dark rooms because it can produce deeper blacks, and it also gets brighter to combat glare. However, the ASUS has wider viewing angles.

ASUS TUF VG27AQ

The ASUS TUF VG27AQ and the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T are both excellent gaming monitors; however, they're also very different. The Samsung is a VA panel monitor available in a 27 inch and 32 inch size, while the ASUS is an IPS monitor and only comes in a 27 inch. The Samsung performs better gaming-wise because it has a higher refresh rate and faster response times. It's also a better choice for viewing HDR content because it has a wider color gamut, higher contrast ratio, and higher peak brightness. If you plan on using it for work, you might want to go with the ASUS. It allows for more ergonomic adjustments so that you can place the screen at a comfortable viewing position, and its wider viewing angles make it easier to share your work with coworkers and clients.

Gigabyte M32Q

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Gigabyte M32Q use different panel types, each with strengths and weaknesses. The Samsung uses a VA panel and is a better choice for a dark room, as it has much better contrast and better black uniformity. The Gigabyte has much better viewing angles and a unique KVM feature that allows you to work with two sources with one set of keyboard and mouse. There's also a significant design difference between these monitors, as the Samsung has a fairly aggressive curve, whereas the Gigabyte is flat.

ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is better than the ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A in gaming performance. The Samsung has a much better response time that results in a clearer image in fast-moving scenes. It has a higher refresh rate of 240Hz compared to the ASUS' 170Hz, but the difference might not be noticeable to casual gamers. The ASUS has better viewing angles because it uses an IPS panel, but it doesn't perform as well as the Samsung in dark rooms because it has a low contrast ratio. The Samsung is available in a 27 inch and 32 inch size, while the ASUS is only available in a 27 inch.

ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B are very different. The Samsung has a standard 16:9 aspect ratio and is available in a 27 inch and 32 inch size, while the ASUS has a wider 21:9 aspect ratio and only comes in a 34 inch size. The Samsung performs much better for gaming because it has a much quicker response time. However, the ASUS' wider format feels more immersive. Also, it gets brighter than the Samsung in most scenes, enough to deliver a pretty decent HDR experience, and it maintains its brightness more consistently across different content.

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 are both excellent gaming monitors with different screen sizes. The Neo G9 is a super ultrawide monitor with a 49 inch screen and 32:9 aspect ratio, while the G7 is available in 27 and 32 inch sizes with a 16:9 aspect ratio. The Neo G9 has Mini LED backlighting which provides better control over the local dimming, so it displays deeper and more uniform blacks. The Neo G9 also gets brighter. The G7 has better motion handling because it has quicker response times and less overshoot on the 'Standard' overdrive setting than the Neo G9.

Samsung Odyssey G9

Overall, the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is better than the Samsung Odyssey G9. The G7 has a higher contrast ratio, significantly faster response time, and a black frame insertion feature to improve motion clarity. However, the G9 has a bigger screen and gets much brighter.

Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X are both excellent gaming monitors. They each have a 1440p resolution and 240Hz refresh rate, but they have different panel types. The Samsung's VA panel has a much higher contrast ratio, allowing it to display deep blacks. It also has a local dimming feature, which the Gigabyte doesn't have, but it doesn't add much because it performs terribly. The Gigabyte's IPS panel has much wider viewing angles, making it a better choice for co-op gaming. Other than that, they each have a very quick response time and low input lag for gaming.

Dell S3222DGM

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is much better than the Dell S3222DGM. The Samsung supports HDR and has a faster refresh rate and a faster response time, so motion looks clearer with less noticeable blur. The Samsung also has a more versatile black frame insertion feature, and the stand has better ergonomics with a better height adjustment and can rotate to portrait orientation and swivel.

Dell S2722DGM

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is much better than the Dell S2722DGM. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate, better ergonomics, supports HDR, and has better gradient handling. The Samsung also has a much faster response time and a more versatile black frame insertion feature.

ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQ

The ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQ is a bit better than the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T. The ASUS has a higher 4k resolution, wider viewing angles, and its brightness is more consistent across different content. However, the Samsung has a higher contrast ratio to produce deeper blacks, faster response time, and a higher 240Hz refresh rate.

ASUS VG279QM

The ASUS VG279QM is a better overall monitor than the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T, but the Samsung is slightly better for gaming. The ASUS has a max refresh rate of 280Hz, it gets brighter, it has wider viewing angles, and it has better out-of-the-box color accuracy. However, the Samsung has a higher 1440p resolution, it displays deep blacks, and it's available either in a 27 or 32 inch size.

Gigabyte AORUS FI32U

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Gigabyte AORUS FI32U use different panel technologies, each with strengths and weaknesses. The Samsung uses a VA panel, and it has much better contrast, a faster refresh rate, and lower input lag when gaming at 60Hz. The Gigabyte, on the other hand, has better viewing angles, a higher resolution screen, and better response time performance in dark scenes. The Gigabyte has two HDMI 2.1 ports, making it a better choice for next-gen console gamers.

ASUS ROG Swift 360Hz PG259QN

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is marginally better than the ASUS ROG Swift 360Hz PG259QN. The Samsung has a higher resolution, better contrast ratio, and although its response time isn't faster, there's less overshoot. However, the ASUS has a higher refresh rate, an IPS panel that provides wider viewing angles, and better ergonomics. The Samsung is a native FreeSync monitor, while the ASUS has native G-SYNC support.

BenQ ZOWIE XL2546K

Overall, the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is much better than the BenQ ZOWIE XL2546K. The Samsung is available in larger screen sizes, has a higher resolution, and its VA panel is better suited for dark rooms. It also gets brighter and supports HDR. The BenQ has much better ergonomics and wider viewing angles.

AOC CQ32G1

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is much better overall than the AOC CQ32G1. They're both available in 27 and 32 inch sizes and have VA panels that display deep blacks. The Samsung has a 240Hz refresh rate, a much quicker response time, and it supports HDR. The AOC has better out-of-the-box color accuracy, and it has fairly wide viewing angles, especially for a VA panel monitor.

LG 27GN950-B

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is better than the LG 27GN950-B. The Samsung has a VA panel with a much better contrast ratio, and it has a higher 240Hz refresh rate. The Samsung also has a black frame insertion feature and slightly lower input lag. However, the LG has an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, gets brighter, and has a higher 4k resolution.

Dell Alienware AW2521H

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is better overall than the Dell Alienware AW2521H, but they have very different features. The Samsung is a 144op, 240Hz monitor with a VA panel. This allows it to produce deep blacks and crisp images. It also has a quicker response time at 60Hz and has FreeSync support. On the other hand, the Dell is a 1080p, 360Hz monitor with an IPS panel. It has much wider viewing angles, a quicker response time at its max refresh rate, lower input lag, native G-SYNC support, and gets brighter.

Samsung C27RG5

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is much better than the Samsung C27RG5. The Odyssey G7 has much better ergonomics, better build quality, higher peak brightness, and supports HDR. The Odyssey G7 delivers a much better gaming experience, with a much faster response time, lower input lag, especially at 60Hz, and an optional black frame insertion feature.

LG 27GP950-B

The LG 27GP950-B and the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T use different panel technologies, each with strengths and weaknesses, so the best one varies depending on your exact usage. The LG has an IPS panel with wide viewing angles and a higher-resolution screen. The LG has two HDMI 2.1 ports, so it's a better choice for next-gen console gamers. The Samsung uses a VA panel, and it's a much better choice for a dark room, as it has much higher contrast and better black uniformity.

LG 48 C1 OLED

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the LG 48 C1 OLED are excellent for gaming, but they have different panel types with pros and cons. The LG's OLED panel has a near-infinite contrast ratio with deep blacks, and it has much wider viewing angles than the Samsung. The LG has a larger screen with a higher 4k resolution, but text looks better on the Samsung because it has higher pixel density. The Samsung has an LED panel that gets brighter and doesn't have the risk of permanent burn-in. It also has a higher 240Hz refresh rate which you can achieve over a DisplayPort connection.

Dell Alienware AW2720HF

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is a much better monitor than the Dell Alienware AW2720HF. The Samsung has a higher 1440p resolution, it has a much better contrast ratio, supports HDR, and has a much quicker response time at 60Hz. However, the Dell has better ergonomics, it has wider viewing angles, and its response time at its max refresh rate is better.

LG 32GN650-B

Overall, the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is better than the LG 32GN650-B. It has a higher refresh rate of 240Hz, compared to the 165Hz on the LG. The Samsung also has a much faster response time at its max refresh rate and 60H0z, so motion looks exceptionally smooth. The Samsung also combats glare better thanks to its high peak brightness and good reflection handling. The viewing angles are better than the LG, although neither has very wide viewing angles because they both use VA panels. The only reason to recommend the LG over the Samsung is if you want a flat screen as opposed to a curved screen.

Samsung Odyssey G3 LF27G35T

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is a higher-end monitor than the Samsung Odyssey G3 LF27G35T, so it performs better overall. The G7 has a curved screen with a 1440p resolution and 240Hz refresh, while the G3 is flat and has a 1080p resolution and 144Hz refresh rate. The G7 has much quicker response times, so motion looks smoother in fast-paced games, and it also supports HDR, which the G3 doesn't. However, the G3 has better ergonomics because it has a wider swivel range.

Gigabyte AORUS FV43U

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is much better than the Gigabyte AORUS FV43U. The Gigabyte has a fixed stand, while the Samsung has okay ergonomics, so it's easier to place it in an ideal viewing position. The Samsung also has better reflection handling, lower input lag, and a much faster response time at 60Hz. On the other hand, the Gigabyte has a larger screen and is much brighter, especially in HDR, so it's slightly better for HDR gaming.

Acer Nitro XV282K KVbmiipruzx

The Acer Nitro XV282K KVbmiipruzx and the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T are both excellent gaming monitors, and they each have their strengths and weaknesses. The Acer has a higher 4k resolution compared to 1440p on the Samsung, but the Samsung has a higher 240Hz refresh rate versus 144Hz for the Acer. Also, they use different panels; the Acer has an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, while the Samsung has a VA panel with better contrast. The Samsung is better to use in well-lit rooms because it gets brighter and has better reflection handling. On the other hand, the Acer features more inputs, including a USB-C input, which the Samsung doesn't have.

Samsung Odyssey G3 S24AG30

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is much better overall than the Samsung Odyssey G3 S24AG30 because it's a higher-end monitor, so it has more features. The LC32G75T has a higher 1440p resolution, is bigger, and has a much faster 240Hz refresh rate compared to 144Hz on the S24AG30. The LC32G75T also has much better motion handling thanks to its quicker response time, and it supports HDR, which the S24AG30 doesn't. The LC32G75T is a curved screen, which not everyone may like, while the S24AG30 has a flat screen.

Acer Nitro XV273 Xbmiiprzx

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is better overall than the Acer Nitro XV273 Xbmiiprzx, but they have different panels. The Samsung is available in a 27 or 32 inch size, it has a 1440p resolution, and since it has a VA panel, it displays much deeper blacks. However, the Acer has wider viewing angles, and it has better ergonomics. Besides that, each monitor has an outstanding response time and incredibly low input lag.

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 use different panel technologies, so the best one depends on your viewing conditions. The Samsung uses a VA panel, and it's better suited for dark-room viewing, as it has much better contrast. The Corsair looks better in a room with a bit of light, and it has better viewing angles. The Corsair has much better colors, with a much wider color gamut in both HDR and SDR.

Acer Predator X25 bmiiprzx

The Acer Predator X25 bmiiprzx and the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T are two very different monitors with a lot to offer for serious gamers. The Acer is a smaller monitor with a lower resolution, but it has an exceptionally high 360Hz refresh rate for those who want a competitive edge. It uses an IPS panel, so its contrast ratio is mediocre. The Samsung has a VA panel, meaning it can produce deep blacks. Its higher 1440p resolution and larger screen may be better for mixed usage and multitasking, but it also delivers amazing gaming performance with outstanding response times and low input lag.

HP OMEN 27c

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is better for gaming than the HP OMEN 27c, despite many similarities between them. They both have curved VA panels with a 1440p resolution and a 240Hz refresh rate, and we even noticed similar issues between both monitors, like flickering with VRR enabled or the VRR not working at 60Hz. However, the Samsung is better in most areas than the HP monitor. The Samsung has better motion handling, gets brighter, and has better ergonomics. Even the contrast ratio is better on the Samsung model, but this may vary between units.

Razer Raptor 27 165Hz

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is better for gaming than the Razer Raptor 27 165Hz. There are a few main differences, like the Samsung's higher 240Hz refresh rate compared to 165Hz on the Razer. The Samsung has a VA panel with higher contrast, but the Razer has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles. Motion looks smoother on the Samsung thanks to the quick response time, and the unit we tested has a larger screen, but it's also available in a 27 inch model like the Razer.

Lenovo D27-30

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is much better than the Lenovo D27-30. The Samsung has a larger, higher-resolution screen and a much faster refresh rate. The Samsung has a much faster response time and lower input lag, so it's a much better choice for gaming. Finally, the Samsung supports HDR, whereas the Lenovo only supports SDR.

ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPE

The ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPE and the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T are very different displays with different uses. The ASUS is a portable monitor with great gaming performance but limited features. The Samsung is a large desktop gaming monitor with better ergonomics, better contrast, and more features, including a black frame insertion feature. The ASUS is far more portable with a built-in 7800mAh battery designed for gaming on the go. In terms of raw gaming performance, though, they're very similar.

LG 32GN50T-B

Overall, the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is much better than the LG 32GN50T-B. The Samsung has a higher 1440p resolution, a 240Hz refresh rate, and significantly faster response time. It can display a wide color gamut and gets brighter in HDR. On the other hand, the LG's brightness is more consistent across different content, and its thinner profile takes up less desk space.

Dell C1422H

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T and the Dell C1422H are two very different monitors with different intended users. The Samsung is a traditional desktop monitor with a large, high-resolution screen and advanced gaming features. The Dell is a compact portable monitor designed for improved productivity on the go.

LG 38WN95C-W

The Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T is slightly better than the LG 38WN95C-W, but they have different panel types. The Samsung has a VA panel, resulting in deep blacks. It also has a higher 240Hz refresh rate, a black frame insertion feature, and a slightly lower input lag. However, the LG has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles. It also has a higher resolution, gets brighter, and has a USB-C port that supports Thunderbolt 3.

+ Show more

Discussions